NASDAQ:GPRE

Green Plains Competitors

$23.08
-1.51 (-6.14 %)
(As of 04/20/2021 02:50 PM ET)
Add
Compare
Today's Range
$22.84
Now: $23.08
$24.31
50-Day Range
$23.05
MA: $26.71
$31.10
52-Week Range
$4.54
Now: $23.08
$31.80
Volume71,557 shs
Average Volume1.18 million shs
Market Capitalization$1.03 billion
P/E RatioN/A
Dividend YieldN/A
Beta1.87

Competitors

Green Plains (NASDAQ:GPRE) Vs. MPC, PSX, VLO, HFC, AMRS, and REGI

Should you be buying GPRE stock or one of its competitors? Companies in the sub-industry of "oil & gas refining & marketing" are considered alternatives and competitors to Green Plains, including Marathon Petroleum (MPC), Phillips 66 (PSX), Valero Energy (VLO), HollyFrontier (HFC), Amyris (AMRS), and Renewable Energy Group (REGI).

Green Plains (NASDAQ:GPRE) and Marathon Petroleum (NYSE:MPC) are both basic materials companies, but which is the better stock? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their valuation, risk, earnings, institutional ownership, profitability, dividends and analyst recommendations.

Profitability

This table compares Green Plains and Marathon Petroleum's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Net MarginsReturn on EquityReturn on Assets
Green Plains-4.51%-4.79%-2.53%
Marathon Petroleum-11.11%-1.81%-0.68%

Institutional and Insider Ownership

99.9% of Green Plains shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 73.7% of Marathon Petroleum shares are owned by institutional investors. 4.6% of Green Plains shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.8% of Marathon Petroleum shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Valuation and Earnings

This table compares Green Plains and Marathon Petroleum's revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

Gross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Green Plains$2.42 billion0.43$-166,860,000.00($3.71)-6.22
Marathon Petroleum$124.88 billion0.27$2.64 billion$4.9410.53

Marathon Petroleum has higher revenue and earnings than Green Plains. Green Plains is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Marathon Petroleum, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a breakdown of recent ratings and target prices for Green Plains and Marathon Petroleum, as provided by MarketBeat.com.

Sell RatingsHold RatingsBuy RatingsStrong Buy RatingsRating Score
Green Plains00603.00
Marathon Petroleum031212.88

Green Plains currently has a consensus target price of $29.1667, indicating a potential upside of 25.56%. Marathon Petroleum has a consensus target price of $51.50, indicating a potential downside of 0.92%. Given Green Plains' stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, equities research analysts clearly believe Green Plains is more favorable than Marathon Petroleum.

Volatility and Risk

Green Plains has a beta of 1.87, suggesting that its stock price is 87% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Marathon Petroleum has a beta of 2.24, suggesting that its stock price is 124% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Summary

Marathon Petroleum beats Green Plains on 9 of the 15 factors compared between the two stocks.

Green Plains (NASDAQ:GPRE) and Phillips 66 (NYSE:PSX) are both basic materials companies, but which is the better stock? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their valuation, risk, earnings, institutional ownership, profitability, dividends and analyst recommendations.

Profitability

This table compares Green Plains and Phillips 66's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Net MarginsReturn on EquityReturn on Assets
Green Plains-4.51%-4.79%-2.53%
Phillips 66-3.45%3.38%1.47%

Institutional and Insider Ownership

99.9% of Green Plains shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 64.6% of Phillips 66 shares are owned by institutional investors. 4.6% of Green Plains shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.6% of Phillips 66 shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Valuation and Earnings

This table compares Green Plains and Phillips 66's revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

Gross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Green Plains$2.42 billion0.43$-166,860,000.00($3.71)-6.22
Phillips 66$109.56 billion0.30$3.08 billion$8.059.39

Phillips 66 has higher revenue and earnings than Green Plains. Green Plains is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Phillips 66, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a breakdown of recent ratings and target prices for Green Plains and Phillips 66, as provided by MarketBeat.com.

Sell RatingsHold RatingsBuy RatingsStrong Buy RatingsRating Score
Green Plains00603.00
Phillips 66041302.76

Green Plains currently has a consensus target price of $29.1667, indicating a potential upside of 25.56%. Phillips 66 has a consensus target price of $82.1250, indicating a potential upside of 8.70%. Given Green Plains' stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, equities research analysts clearly believe Green Plains is more favorable than Phillips 66.

Volatility and Risk

Green Plains has a beta of 1.87, suggesting that its stock price is 87% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Phillips 66 has a beta of 1.67, suggesting that its stock price is 67% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Green Plains (NASDAQ:GPRE) and Valero Energy (NYSE:VLO) are both basic materials companies, but which is the better stock? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their valuation, risk, earnings, institutional ownership, profitability, dividends and analyst recommendations.

Profitability

This table compares Green Plains and Valero Energy's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Net MarginsReturn on EquityReturn on Assets
Green Plains-4.51%-4.79%-2.53%
Valero EnergyN/A0.18%0.07%

Institutional and Insider Ownership

99.9% of Green Plains shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 74.6% of Valero Energy shares are owned by institutional investors. 4.6% of Green Plains shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.3% of Valero Energy shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Valuation and Earnings

This table compares Green Plains and Valero Energy's revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

Gross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Green Plains$2.42 billion0.43$-166,860,000.00($3.71)-6.22
Valero Energy$108.32 billion0.26$2.42 billion$5.7012.07

Valero Energy has higher revenue and earnings than Green Plains. Green Plains is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Valero Energy, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a breakdown of recent ratings and target prices for Green Plains and Valero Energy, as provided by MarketBeat.com.

Sell RatingsHold RatingsBuy RatingsStrong Buy RatingsRating Score
Green Plains00603.00
Valero Energy111212.87

Green Plains currently has a consensus target price of $29.1667, indicating a potential upside of 25.56%. Valero Energy has a consensus target price of $79.5714, indicating a potential upside of 15.72%. Given Green Plains' stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, equities research analysts clearly believe Green Plains is more favorable than Valero Energy.

Volatility and Risk

Green Plains has a beta of 1.87, suggesting that its stock price is 87% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Valero Energy has a beta of 2.14, suggesting that its stock price is 114% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Summary

Valero Energy beats Green Plains on 9 of the 15 factors compared between the two stocks.

Green Plains (NASDAQ:GPRE) and HollyFrontier (NYSE:HFC) are both basic materials companies, but which is the better stock? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their valuation, risk, earnings, institutional ownership, profitability, dividends and analyst recommendations.

Volatility and Risk

Green Plains has a beta of 1.87, suggesting that its stock price is 87% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, HollyFrontier has a beta of 1.83, suggesting that its stock price is 83% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Valuation and Earnings

This table compares Green Plains and HollyFrontier's revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

Gross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Green Plains$2.42 billion0.43$-166,860,000.00($3.71)-6.22
HollyFrontier$17.49 billion0.31$772.39 million$4.906.88

HollyFrontier has higher revenue and earnings than Green Plains. Green Plains is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than HollyFrontier, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a breakdown of recent ratings and target prices for Green Plains and HollyFrontier, as provided by MarketBeat.com.

Sell RatingsHold RatingsBuy RatingsStrong Buy RatingsRating Score
Green Plains00603.00
HollyFrontier28502.20

Green Plains currently has a consensus target price of $29.1667, indicating a potential upside of 25.56%. HollyFrontier has a consensus target price of $35.3077, indicating a potential upside of 4.83%. Given Green Plains' stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, equities research analysts clearly believe Green Plains is more favorable than HollyFrontier.

Profitability

This table compares Green Plains and HollyFrontier's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Net MarginsReturn on EquityReturn on Assets
Green Plains-4.51%-4.79%-2.53%
HollyFrontier-3.34%0.93%0.49%

Institutional and Insider Ownership

99.9% of Green Plains shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 84.4% of HollyFrontier shares are owned by institutional investors. 4.6% of Green Plains shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.4% of HollyFrontier shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Summary

Green Plains beats HollyFrontier on 8 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

Amyris (NASDAQ:AMRS) and Green Plains (NASDAQ:GPRE) are both basic materials companies, but which is the better business? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, profitability, institutional ownership, risk, dividends, valuation and earnings.

Risk and Volatility

Amyris has a beta of 1.04, meaning that its share price is 4% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Green Plains has a beta of 1.87, meaning that its share price is 87% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Analyst Ratings

This is a summary of recent ratings and recommmendations for Amyris and Green Plains, as provided by MarketBeat.

Sell RatingsHold RatingsBuy RatingsStrong Buy RatingsRating Score
Amyris00503.00
Green Plains00603.00

Amyris currently has a consensus price target of $17.87, indicating a potential upside of 25.85%. Green Plains has a consensus price target of $29.1667, indicating a potential upside of 25.56%. Given Amyris' higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Amyris is more favorable than Green Plains.

Profitability

This table compares Amyris and Green Plains' net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Net MarginsReturn on EquityReturn on Assets
Amyris-223.41%N/A-149.25%
Green Plains-4.51%-4.79%-2.53%

Institutional and Insider Ownership

43.5% of Amyris shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 99.9% of Green Plains shares are owned by institutional investors. 39.7% of Amyris shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 4.6% of Green Plains shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Earnings and Valuation

This table compares Amyris and Green Plains' top-line revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

Gross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Amyris$152.56 million25.45$-242,770,000.00($2.72)-5.22
Green Plains$2.42 billion0.43$-166,860,000.00($3.71)-6.22

Green Plains has higher revenue and earnings than Amyris. Green Plains is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Amyris, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Summary

Green Plains beats Amyris on 7 of the 13 factors compared between the two stocks.

Green Plains (NASDAQ:GPRE) and Renewable Energy Group (NASDAQ:REGI) are both basic materials companies, but which is the superior business? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, profitability, risk, institutional ownership, valuation, dividends and earnings.

Volatility and Risk

Green Plains has a beta of 1.87, meaning that its share price is 87% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Renewable Energy Group has a beta of 1.19, meaning that its share price is 19% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a summary of recent recommendations for Green Plains and Renewable Energy Group, as reported by MarketBeat.com.

Sell RatingsHold RatingsBuy RatingsStrong Buy RatingsRating Score
Green Plains00603.00
Renewable Energy Group02802.80

Green Plains presently has a consensus price target of $29.1667, indicating a potential upside of 25.56%. Renewable Energy Group has a consensus price target of $89.1250, indicating a potential upside of 53.29%. Given Renewable Energy Group's higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Renewable Energy Group is more favorable than Green Plains.

Profitability

This table compares Green Plains and Renewable Energy Group's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Net MarginsReturn on EquityReturn on Assets
Green Plains-4.51%-4.79%-2.53%
Renewable Energy Group22.72%13.11%9.25%

Institutional & Insider Ownership

99.9% of Green Plains shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 96.2% of Renewable Energy Group shares are held by institutional investors. 4.6% of Green Plains shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 3.0% of Renewable Energy Group shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Valuation and Earnings

This table compares Green Plains and Renewable Energy Group's top-line revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

Gross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Green Plains$2.42 billion0.43$-166,860,000.00($3.71)-6.22
Renewable Energy Group$2.64 billion0.98$389.73 million$3.7515.56

Renewable Energy Group has higher revenue and earnings than Green Plains. Green Plains is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Renewable Energy Group, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Summary

Renewable Energy Group beats Green Plains on 10 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.


Green Plains Competitors List

Competitor NameCompetitor BTM RankCompetitor PriceCompetitor Price ChangeCompetitor Market CapCompetitor RevenueCompetitor P/E RatioCompetitor Indicator(s)
Marathon Petroleum logo
MPC
Marathon Petroleum
2.2$52.03-2.7%$34.80 billion$124.88 billion-3.44Analyst Revision
Phillips 66 logo
PSX
Phillips 66
1.7$75.60-3.1%$34.13 billion$109.56 billion-12.25Analyst Revision
News Coverage
Valero Energy logo
VLO
Valero Energy
2.2$68.80-3.0%$28.95 billion$108.32 billion-2,292.57Upcoming Earnings
Dividend Announcement
Analyst Report
Decrease in Short Interest
Analyst Revision
News Coverage
HollyFrontier logo
HFC
HollyFrontier
2.0$33.69-3.5%$5.66 billion$17.49 billion-12.91Analyst Revision
Amyris logo
AMRS
Amyris
1.5$14.21-1.6%$3.95 billion$152.56 million-6.37
Renewable Energy Group logo
REGI
Renewable Energy Group
2.4$58.34-5.9%$2.74 billion$2.64 billion4.22
Clean Energy Fuels logo
CLNE
Clean Energy Fuels
1.1$9.32-27.0%$2.36 billion$344.07 million54.82Analyst Downgrade
News Coverage
Gap Up
World Fuel Services logo
INT
World Fuel Services
1.9$32.84-4.2%$2.16 billion$36.82 billion12.53
CVR Energy logo
CVI
CVR Energy
1.0$18.16-3.4%$1.89 billion$6.36 billion-12.61Unusual Options Activity
PBF Energy logo
PBF
PBF Energy
1.4$12.32-9.3%$1.62 billion$24.51 billion-1.41Analyst Upgrade
Decrease in Short Interest
Analyst Revision
News Coverage
Delek US logo
DK
Delek US
1.1$20.15-5.4%$1.57 billion$9.30 billion-5.22Analyst Revision
Gevo logo
GEVO
Gevo
1.3$5.82-6.7%$1.23 billion$24.49 million-3.57Increase in Short Interest
News Coverage
Gap Up
REX American Resources logo
REX
REX American Resources
0.9$82.06-0.6%$494.58 million$418.03 million126.25Decrease in Short Interest
This page was last updated on 4/20/2021 by MarketBeat.com Staff
MarketBeat - Stock Market News and Research Tools logo

MarketBeat empowers individual investors to make better trading decisions by providing real-time financial data and objective market analysis. Whether you’re looking for analyst ratings, corporate buybacks, dividends, earnings, economic reports, financials, insider trades, IPOs, SEC filings or stock splits, MarketBeat has the objective information you need to analyze any stock. Learn more.

MarketBeat is accredited by the Better Business Bureau

© American Consumer News, LLC dba MarketBeat® 2010-2021. All rights reserved.
326 E 8th St #105, Sioux Falls, SD 57103 | U.S. Based Support Team at [email protected] | (844) 978-6257
MarketBeat does not provide personalized financial advice and does not issue recommendations or offers to buy stock or sell any security. Learn more.

Our Accessibility Statement | Terms of Service | Do Not Sell My Information

© 2021 Market data provided is at least 10-minutes delayed and hosted by Barchart Solutions. Information is provided 'as-is' and solely for informational purposes, not for trading purposes or advice, and is delayed. To see all exchange delays and terms of use please see disclaimer. Fundamental company data provided by Zacks Investment Research. As a bonus to opt-ing into our email newsletters, you will also get a free subscription to the Liberty Through Wealth e-newsletter. You can opt out at any time.