MPC vs. PSX, VLO, PBF, CVI, DK, GPRE, REX, CLNE, GEVO, and COP
Should you be buying Marathon Petroleum stock or one of its competitors? The main competitors of Marathon Petroleum include Phillips 66 (PSX), Valero Energy (VLO), PBF Energy (PBF), CVR Energy (CVI), Delek US (DK), Green Plains (GPRE), REX American Resources (REX), Clean Energy Fuels (CLNE), Gevo (GEVO), and ConocoPhillips (COP).
Marathon Petroleum (NYSE:MPC) and Phillips 66 (NYSE:PSX) are both large-cap oils/energy companies, but which is the better stock? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their earnings, dividends, risk, profitability, institutional ownership, valuation, analyst recommendations, community ranking and media sentiment.
Marathon Petroleum has higher revenue and earnings than Phillips 66. Marathon Petroleum is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Phillips 66, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.
Marathon Petroleum has a net margin of 5.32% compared to Phillips 66's net margin of 3.84%. Marathon Petroleum's return on equity of 25.87% beat Phillips 66's return on equity.
Marathon Petroleum pays an annual dividend of $3.30 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.9%. Phillips 66 pays an annual dividend of $4.60 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.2%. Marathon Petroleum pays out 16.5% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Phillips 66 pays out 35.4% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years.
Marathon Petroleum received 225 more outperform votes than Phillips 66 when rated by MarketBeat users. Likewise, 73.41% of users gave Marathon Petroleum an outperform vote while only 60.80% of users gave Phillips 66 an outperform vote.
76.8% of Marathon Petroleum shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 76.9% of Phillips 66 shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.2% of Marathon Petroleum shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.2% of Phillips 66 shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.
In the previous week, Phillips 66 had 2 more articles in the media than Marathon Petroleum. MarketBeat recorded 15 mentions for Phillips 66 and 13 mentions for Marathon Petroleum. Phillips 66's average media sentiment score of 0.50 beat Marathon Petroleum's score of 0.49 indicating that Phillips 66 is being referred to more favorably in the news media.
Marathon Petroleum presently has a consensus target price of $193.64, indicating a potential upside of 12.16%. Phillips 66 has a consensus target price of $158.23, indicating a potential upside of 11.27%. Given Marathon Petroleum's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, equities research analysts plainly believe Marathon Petroleum is more favorable than Phillips 66.
Marathon Petroleum has a beta of 1.4, meaning that its stock price is 40% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Phillips 66 has a beta of 1.34, meaning that its stock price is 34% more volatile than the S&P 500.
Summary
Marathon Petroleum beats Phillips 66 on 13 of the 21 factors compared between the two stocks.
Get Marathon Petroleum News Delivered to You Automatically
Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for MPC and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.
This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding MPC and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.
Skip ChartThis chart shows the average media sentiment of NYSE and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Skip Chart
Marathon Petroleum Competitors List
Related Companies and Tools