Does the media refer more to DINO or MPC?

In the previous week, Marathon Petroleum had 6 more articles in the media than HF Sinclair. MarketBeat recorded 20 mentions for Marathon Petroleum and 14 mentions for HF Sinclair. Marathon Petroleum's average media sentiment score of 0.95 beat HF Sinclair's score of 0.92 indicating that Marathon Petroleum is being referred to more favorably in the news media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment HF Sinclair 6 Very Positive mention(s) 4 Positive mention(s) 1 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive Marathon Petroleum 14 Very Positive mention(s) 1 Positive mention(s) 3 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 2 Very Negative mention(s) Positive

Is MPC or MPLX more profitable?

Mplx has a net margin of 36.38% compared to Marathon Petroleum's net margin of 3.36%. Mplx's return on equity of 32.74% beat Marathon Petroleum's return on equity. Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets Marathon Petroleum 3.36% 16.22% 4.60% Mplx 36.38% 32.74% 11.25%

Does the media prefer MPC or MPLX?

In the previous week, Marathon Petroleum had 16 more articles in the media than Mplx. MarketBeat recorded 20 mentions for Marathon Petroleum and 4 mentions for Mplx. Marathon Petroleum's average media sentiment score of 0.95 beat Mplx's score of 0.51 indicating that Marathon Petroleum is being referred to more favorably in the media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment Marathon Petroleum 14 Very Positive mention(s) 1 Positive mention(s) 3 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 2 Very Negative mention(s) Positive Mplx 1 Very Positive mention(s) 2 Positive mention(s) 1 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive

Does the media refer more to PARR or MPC?

In the previous week, Marathon Petroleum had 7 more articles in the media than Par Pacific. MarketBeat recorded 20 mentions for Marathon Petroleum and 13 mentions for Par Pacific. Marathon Petroleum's average media sentiment score of 0.95 beat Par Pacific's score of 0.72 indicating that Marathon Petroleum is being referred to more favorably in the news media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment Par Pacific 4 Very Positive mention(s) 4 Positive mention(s) 3 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive Marathon Petroleum 14 Very Positive mention(s) 1 Positive mention(s) 3 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 2 Very Negative mention(s) Positive

Which has preferable earnings & valuation, PBF or MPC?

Marathon Petroleum has higher revenue and earnings than PBF Energy. PBF Energy is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Marathon Petroleum, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks. Company Gross Revenue Price/Sales Ratio Net Income Earnings Per Share Price/Earnings Ratio PBF Energy $30.17B 0.23 -$158.50M $3.71 15.85 Marathon Petroleum $135.22B 0.65 $4.05B $15.32 19.54

Does the media prefer PBF or MPC?

In the previous week, PBF Energy had 7 more articles in the media than Marathon Petroleum. MarketBeat recorded 27 mentions for PBF Energy and 20 mentions for Marathon Petroleum. PBF Energy's average media sentiment score of 0.99 beat Marathon Petroleum's score of 0.95 indicating that PBF Energy is being referred to more favorably in the media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment PBF Energy 16 Very Positive mention(s) 6 Positive mention(s) 0 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive Marathon Petroleum 14 Very Positive mention(s) 1 Positive mention(s) 3 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 2 Very Negative mention(s) Positive

Which has preferable earnings and valuation, PSX or MPC?

Phillips 66 has higher revenue and earnings than Marathon Petroleum. Phillips 66 is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Marathon Petroleum, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks. Company Gross Revenue Price/Sales Ratio Net Income Earnings Per Share Price/Earnings Ratio Phillips 66 $136.56B 0.58 $4.40B $10.15 19.30 Marathon Petroleum $135.22B 0.65 $4.05B $15.32 19.54

Does the media favor PSX or MPC?

In the previous week, Phillips 66 had 18 more articles in the media than Marathon Petroleum. MarketBeat recorded 38 mentions for Phillips 66 and 20 mentions for Marathon Petroleum. Marathon Petroleum's average media sentiment score of 0.95 beat Phillips 66's score of 0.29 indicating that Marathon Petroleum is being referred to more favorably in the news media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment Phillips 66 10 Very Positive mention(s) 9 Positive mention(s) 11 Neutral mention(s) 1 Negative mention(s) 4 Very Negative mention(s) Neutral Marathon Petroleum 14 Very Positive mention(s) 1 Positive mention(s) 3 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 2 Very Negative mention(s) Positive

Marathon Petroleum (MPC) Competitors

$299.39 -4.01 (-1.32%)

Closing price 03:59 PM Eastern

Extended Trading

$300.00 +0.61 (+0.20%)

As of 07:21 PM Eastern

Compare

MPC vs. DINO, MPLX, PARR, PBF, and PSX

Should you buy Marathon Petroleum stock or one of its competitors? MarketBeat compares Marathon Petroleum with other companies and stocks that may be similar based on industry, sector, market capitalization, business model, investor interest, or shared news coverage. Companies and stocks commonly compared with Marathon Petroleum include HF Sinclair (DINO), Mplx (MPLX), Par Pacific (PARR), PBF Energy (PBF), and Phillips 66 (PSX). These companies are all part of the "energy" sector.

How does Marathon Petroleum compare to HF Sinclair?

HF Sinclair (NYSE:DINO) and Marathon Petroleum (NYSE:MPC) are both large-cap energy companies, but which is the superior business? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, risk, media sentiment, earnings, institutional ownership, valuation, dividends and profitability.

In the previous week, Marathon Petroleum had 6 more articles in the media than HF Sinclair. MarketBeat recorded 20 mentions for Marathon Petroleum and 14 mentions for HF Sinclair. Marathon Petroleum's average media sentiment score of 0.95 beat HF Sinclair's score of 0.92 indicating that Marathon Petroleum is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
HF Sinclair	6 Very Positive mention(s)	4 Positive mention(s)	1 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive
Marathon Petroleum	14 Very Positive mention(s)	1 Positive mention(s)	3 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	2 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive

HF Sinclair currently has a consensus price target of $74.27, suggesting a potential downside of 11.47%. Marathon Petroleum has a consensus price target of $283.56, suggesting a potential downside of 5.29%. Given Marathon Petroleum's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Marathon Petroleum is more favorable than HF Sinclair.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
HF Sinclair	0 Sell rating(s)	8 Hold rating(s)	6 Buy rating(s)	1 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.53
Marathon Petroleum	0 Sell rating(s)	8 Hold rating(s)	10 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.56

HF Sinclair has a net margin of 4.46% compared to Marathon Petroleum's net margin of 3.36%. Marathon Petroleum's return on equity of 16.22% beat HF Sinclair's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
HF Sinclair	4.46%	11.94%	6.57%
Marathon Petroleum	3.36%	16.22%	4.60%

HF Sinclair pays an annual dividend of $2.00 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.4%. Marathon Petroleum pays an annual dividend of $4.00 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.3%. HF Sinclair pays out 30.1% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Marathon Petroleum pays out 26.1% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. HF Sinclair has increased its dividend for 3 consecutive years and Marathon Petroleum has increased its dividend for 3 consecutive years.

HF Sinclair has a beta of 0.72, meaning that its share price is 28% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Marathon Petroleum has a beta of 0.52, meaning that its share price is 48% less volatile than the broader market.

Marathon Petroleum has higher revenue and earnings than HF Sinclair. HF Sinclair is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Marathon Petroleum, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
HF Sinclair	$26.87B	0.56	$579M	$6.65	12.62
Marathon Petroleum	$135.22B	0.65	$4.05B	$15.32	19.54

88.3% of HF Sinclair shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 76.8% of Marathon Petroleum shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.3% of HF Sinclair shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.2% of Marathon Petroleum shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Summary

Marathon Petroleum beats HF Sinclair on 12 of the 19 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Marathon Petroleum compare to Mplx?

Marathon Petroleum (NYSE:MPC) and Mplx (NYSE:MPLX) are both large-cap energy companies, but which is the better business? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their risk, analyst recommendations, valuation, media sentiment, institutional ownership, earnings, profitability and dividends.

Mplx has a net margin of 36.38% compared to Marathon Petroleum's net margin of 3.36%. Mplx's return on equity of 32.74% beat Marathon Petroleum's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Marathon Petroleum	3.36%	16.22%	4.60%
Mplx	36.38%	32.74%	11.25%

Marathon Petroleum presently has a consensus price target of $283.56, suggesting a potential downside of 5.29%. Mplx has a consensus price target of $61.60, suggesting a potential upside of 9.29%. Given Mplx's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Mplx is more favorable than Marathon Petroleum.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Marathon Petroleum	0 Sell rating(s)	8 Hold rating(s)	10 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.56
Mplx	0 Sell rating(s)	5 Hold rating(s)	7 Buy rating(s)	1 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.69

Marathon Petroleum has a beta of 0.52, indicating that its share price is 48% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Mplx has a beta of 0.47, indicating that its share price is 53% less volatile than the broader market.

Mplx has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Marathon Petroleum. Mplx is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Marathon Petroleum, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Marathon Petroleum	$135.22B	0.65	$4.05B	$15.32	19.54
Mplx	$13.00B	4.40	$4.91B	$4.62	12.20

In the previous week, Marathon Petroleum had 16 more articles in the media than Mplx. MarketBeat recorded 20 mentions for Marathon Petroleum and 4 mentions for Mplx. Marathon Petroleum's average media sentiment score of 0.95 beat Mplx's score of 0.51 indicating that Marathon Petroleum is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Marathon Petroleum	14 Very Positive mention(s)	1 Positive mention(s)	3 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	2 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive
Mplx	1 Very Positive mention(s)	2 Positive mention(s)	1 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive

76.8% of Marathon Petroleum shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 24.3% of Mplx shares are held by institutional investors. 0.2% of Marathon Petroleum shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Marathon Petroleum pays an annual dividend of $4.00 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.3%. Mplx pays an annual dividend of $4.31 per share and has a dividend yield of 7.6%. Marathon Petroleum pays out 26.1% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Mplx pays out 93.3% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Marathon Petroleum has increased its dividend for 3 consecutive years and Mplx has increased its dividend for 9 consecutive years. Mplx is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

Summary

Marathon Petroleum and Mplx tied by winning 10 of the 20 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Marathon Petroleum compare to Par Pacific?

Par Pacific (NYSE:PARR) and Marathon Petroleum (NYSE:MPC) are both energy companies, but which is the superior investment? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their media sentiment, profitability, dividends, risk, earnings, institutional ownership, analyst recommendations and valuation.

In the previous week, Marathon Petroleum had 7 more articles in the media than Par Pacific. MarketBeat recorded 20 mentions for Marathon Petroleum and 13 mentions for Par Pacific. Marathon Petroleum's average media sentiment score of 0.95 beat Par Pacific's score of 0.72 indicating that Marathon Petroleum is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Par Pacific	4 Very Positive mention(s)	4 Positive mention(s)	3 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive
Marathon Petroleum	14 Very Positive mention(s)	1 Positive mention(s)	3 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	2 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive

Par Pacific has a beta of 0.82, indicating that its stock price is 18% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Marathon Petroleum has a beta of 0.52, indicating that its stock price is 48% less volatile than the broader market.

Par Pacific currently has a consensus target price of $72.00, indicating a potential downside of 1.68%. Marathon Petroleum has a consensus target price of $283.56, indicating a potential downside of 5.29%. Given Par Pacific's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, equities research analysts clearly believe Par Pacific is more favorable than Marathon Petroleum.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Par Pacific	0 Sell rating(s)	2 Hold rating(s)	10 Buy rating(s)	1 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.92
Marathon Petroleum	0 Sell rating(s)	8 Hold rating(s)	10 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.56

Marathon Petroleum has higher revenue and earnings than Par Pacific. Par Pacific is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Marathon Petroleum, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Par Pacific	$7.46B	0.49	$369.39M	$8.96	8.17
Marathon Petroleum	$135.22B	0.65	$4.05B	$15.32	19.54

Par Pacific has a net margin of 6.02% compared to Marathon Petroleum's net margin of 3.36%. Par Pacific's return on equity of 34.38% beat Marathon Petroleum's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Par Pacific	6.02%	34.38%	11.96%
Marathon Petroleum	3.36%	16.22%	4.60%

92.2% of Par Pacific shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 76.8% of Marathon Petroleum shares are owned by institutional investors. 3.6% of Par Pacific shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 0.2% of Marathon Petroleum shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Summary

Par Pacific beats Marathon Petroleum on 9 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Marathon Petroleum compare to PBF Energy?

PBF Energy (NYSE:PBF) and Marathon Petroleum (NYSE:MPC) are both energy companies, but which is the superior investment? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their earnings, risk, dividends, media sentiment, analyst recommendations, profitability, institutional ownership and valuation.

PBF Energy has a beta of 0.11, suggesting that its share price is 89% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Marathon Petroleum has a beta of 0.52, suggesting that its share price is 48% less volatile than the broader market.

Marathon Petroleum has a net margin of 3.36% compared to PBF Energy's net margin of 1.46%. Marathon Petroleum's return on equity of 16.22% beat PBF Energy's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
PBF Energy	1.46%	-4.12%	-1.66%
Marathon Petroleum	3.36%	16.22%	4.60%

Marathon Petroleum has higher revenue and earnings than PBF Energy. PBF Energy is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Marathon Petroleum, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
PBF Energy	$30.17B	0.23	-$158.50M	$3.71	15.85
Marathon Petroleum	$135.22B	0.65	$4.05B	$15.32	19.54

In the previous week, PBF Energy had 7 more articles in the media than Marathon Petroleum. MarketBeat recorded 27 mentions for PBF Energy and 20 mentions for Marathon Petroleum. PBF Energy's average media sentiment score of 0.99 beat Marathon Petroleum's score of 0.95 indicating that PBF Energy is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
PBF Energy	16 Very Positive mention(s)	6 Positive mention(s)	0 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive
Marathon Petroleum	14 Very Positive mention(s)	1 Positive mention(s)	3 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	2 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive

PBF Energy presently has a consensus price target of $38.50, indicating a potential downside of 34.54%. Marathon Petroleum has a consensus price target of $283.56, indicating a potential downside of 5.29%. Given Marathon Petroleum's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Marathon Petroleum is more favorable than PBF Energy.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
PBF Energy	4 Sell rating(s)	9 Hold rating(s)	2 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	1.87
Marathon Petroleum	0 Sell rating(s)	8 Hold rating(s)	10 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.56

PBF Energy pays an annual dividend of $1.10 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.9%. Marathon Petroleum pays an annual dividend of $4.00 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.3%. PBF Energy pays out 29.6% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Marathon Petroleum pays out 26.1% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. PBF Energy has raised its dividend for 2 consecutive years and Marathon Petroleum has raised its dividend for 3 consecutive years.

96.3% of PBF Energy shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 76.8% of Marathon Petroleum shares are owned by institutional investors. 5.5% of PBF Energy shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.2% of Marathon Petroleum shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Summary

Marathon Petroleum beats PBF Energy on 14 of the 19 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Marathon Petroleum compare to Phillips 66?

Phillips 66 (NYSE:PSX) and Marathon Petroleum (NYSE:MPC) are both large-cap energy companies, but which is the superior investment? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their earnings, profitability, analyst recommendations, valuation, institutional ownership, media sentiment, dividends and risk.

Marathon Petroleum has a net margin of 3.36% compared to Phillips 66's net margin of 2.99%. Marathon Petroleum's return on equity of 16.22% beat Phillips 66's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Phillips 66	2.99%	10.98%	4.13%
Marathon Petroleum	3.36%	16.22%	4.60%

Phillips 66 has higher revenue and earnings than Marathon Petroleum. Phillips 66 is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Marathon Petroleum, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Phillips 66	$136.56B	0.58	$4.40B	$10.15	19.30
Marathon Petroleum	$135.22B	0.65	$4.05B	$15.32	19.54

76.9% of Phillips 66 shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 76.8% of Marathon Petroleum shares are held by institutional investors. 0.4% of Phillips 66 shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.2% of Marathon Petroleum shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Phillips 66 currently has a consensus price target of $196.06, suggesting a potential upside of 0.06%. Marathon Petroleum has a consensus price target of $283.56, suggesting a potential downside of 5.29%. Given Phillips 66's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, research analysts clearly believe Phillips 66 is more favorable than Marathon Petroleum.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Phillips 66	0 Sell rating(s)	9 Hold rating(s)	12 Buy rating(s)	1 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.64
Marathon Petroleum	0 Sell rating(s)	8 Hold rating(s)	10 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.56

In the previous week, Phillips 66 had 18 more articles in the media than Marathon Petroleum. MarketBeat recorded 38 mentions for Phillips 66 and 20 mentions for Marathon Petroleum. Marathon Petroleum's average media sentiment score of 0.95 beat Phillips 66's score of 0.29 indicating that Marathon Petroleum is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Phillips 66	10 Very Positive mention(s)	9 Positive mention(s)	11 Neutral mention(s)	1 Negative mention(s)	4 Very Negative mention(s)	Neutral
Marathon Petroleum	14 Very Positive mention(s)	1 Positive mention(s)	3 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	2 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive

Phillips 66 has a beta of 0.69, suggesting that its stock price is 31% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Marathon Petroleum has a beta of 0.52, suggesting that its stock price is 48% less volatile than the broader market.

Phillips 66 pays an annual dividend of $5.08 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.6%. Marathon Petroleum pays an annual dividend of $4.00 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.3%. Phillips 66 pays out 50.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Marathon Petroleum pays out 26.1% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Phillips 66 has raised its dividend for 14 consecutive years and Marathon Petroleum has raised its dividend for 3 consecutive years. Phillips 66 is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

Summary

Phillips 66 beats Marathon Petroleum on 12 of the 20 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Marathon Petroleum News Delivered to You Automatically

Subscribe Now

SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding MPC and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of NYSE and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.

MPC vs. The Competition

Export

Metric	Marathon Petroleum	OIL REFING&MKTG Industry	Energy Sector	NYSE Exchange
Market Cap	$87.40B	$46.24B	$9.95B	$23.39B
Dividend Yield	1.35%	2.09%	10.70%	4.01%
P/E Ratio	19.54	16.58	19.17	31.23
Price / Sales	0.65	0.72	427.06	19.15
Price / Cash	13.59	10.79	37.04	24.90
Price / Book	3.74	2.78	4.12	4.78
Net Income	$4.05B	$2.34B	$4.25B	$1.07B
7 Day Performance	6.76%	5.44%	0.63%	1.00%
1 Month Performance	19.34%	17.90%	-3.08%	0.42%
1 Year Performance	70.25%	61.80%	29.33%	18.61%

Marathon Petroleum Competitors List

Export

Company	MarketRank	Share Price	Analysts' Price Target	1Y Price Performance	Market Cap	Revenue	P/E Ratio	Employee Count	Indicator(s)
MPC Marathon Petroleum	3.8567 of 5 stars	$299.39 -1.3%	$283.56 -5.3%	+72.4%	$87.40B	$135.22B	19.54	18,500	Analyst Forecast
DINO HF Sinclair	3.8622 of 5 stars	$72.50 +0.0%	$71.55 -1.3%	+87.7%	$13.07B	$26.87B	10.90	5,165	News Coverage Analyst Forecast Options Volume
MPLX Mplx	4.11 of 5 stars	$57.20 +0.1%	$61.60 +7.7%	+11.0%	$58.04B	$13.00B	12.38	5,762
PARR Par Pacific	1.6713 of 5 stars	$58.56 +0.1%	$70.00 +19.5%	+114.6%	$2.94B	$7.46B	6.54	1,758	Analyst Forecast
PBF PBF Energy	3.2932 of 5 stars	$47.78 -0.1%	$36.69 -23.2%	+125.1%	$5.65B	$29.33B	12.88	3,678	Trending News Analyst Downgrade Insider Trade

Related Companies and Tools

Related Companies

Top 10 Stock Comparisons

This page (NYSE:MPC) was last updated on 7/15/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.

From Our Partners

Unlock superior investment research and tools.

Get MarketBeat All Access

In-depth profiles and analysis for 20,000 public companies.
Real-time analyst ratings, insider transactions, earnings data, and more.
Our daily ratings and market update email newsletter.

Sign In
Create Account

Your Email Address:

Your Password:

Forgot your password?

Your Email Address:

Choose a Password:

By creating a free account, you agree to our terms of service. This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

Marathon Petroleum (MPC) Competitors

MPC vs. DINO, MPLX, PARR, PBF, and PSX

How does Marathon Petroleum compare to HF Sinclair?

Summary

How does Marathon Petroleum compare to Mplx?

Summary

How does Marathon Petroleum compare to Par Pacific?

Summary

How does Marathon Petroleum compare to PBF Energy?

Summary

How does Marathon Petroleum compare to Phillips 66?

Summary

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

Media Sentiment Over Time

MPC vs. The Competition

Marathon Petroleum Competitors List

Related Companies and Tools

Best-in-Class Portfolio Monitoring

Stock Ideas and Recommendations

Advanced Stock Screeners and Research Tools

About MarketBeat

MarketBeat Products

Popular Tools

Financial Calendars

Terms & Info

Marathon Petroleum (MPC) Competitors

MPC vs. DINO, MPLX, PARR, PBF, and PSX

How does Marathon Petroleum compare to HF Sinclair?

Does the media refer more to DINO or MPC?

Do analysts rate DINO or MPC?

Is DINO or MPC more profitable?

Is DINO or MPC a better dividend stock?

Which has more risk & volatility, DINO or MPC?

Which has preferable earnings and valuation, DINO or MPC?

Do insiders and institutionals hold more shares of DINO or MPC?

Summary

How does Marathon Petroleum compare to Mplx?

Is MPC or MPLX more profitable?

Do analysts rate MPC or MPLX?

Which has more volatility & risk, MPC or MPLX?

Which has better earnings & valuation, MPC or MPLX?

Does the media prefer MPC or MPLX?

Do insiders & institutionals believe in MPC or MPLX?

Is MPC or MPLX a better dividend stock?

Summary

How does Marathon Petroleum compare to Par Pacific?

Does the media refer more to PARR or MPC?

Which has more volatility and risk, PARR or MPC?

Do analysts recommend PARR or MPC?

Which has stronger valuation & earnings, PARR or MPC?

Is PARR or MPC more profitable?

Do institutionals and insiders have more ownership in PARR or MPC?

Summary

How does Marathon Petroleum compare to PBF Energy?

Which has more risk and volatility, PBF or MPC?

Is PBF or MPC more profitable?

Which has preferable earnings & valuation, PBF or MPC?

Does the media prefer PBF or MPC?

Do analysts prefer PBF or MPC?

Is PBF or MPC a better dividend stock?

Do insiders & institutionals believe in PBF or MPC?

Summary

How does Marathon Petroleum compare to Phillips 66?

Is PSX or MPC more profitable?

Which has preferable earnings and valuation, PSX or MPC?

Do institutionals & insiders believe in PSX or MPC?

Do analysts rate PSX or MPC?

Does the media favor PSX or MPC?

Which has more risk & volatility, PSX or MPC?

Is PSX or MPC a better dividend stock?

Summary

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

Media Sentiment Over Time

MPC vs. The Competition

Marathon Petroleum Competitors List

Related Companies and Tools

MarketBeat All Access Features

Best-in-Class Portfolio Monitoring

Stock Ideas and Recommendations

Advanced Stock Screeners and Research Tools