Does the media refer more to MPC or DINO?

In the previous week, Marathon Petroleum had 40 more articles in the media than HF Sinclair. MarketBeat recorded 63 mentions for Marathon Petroleum and 23 mentions for HF Sinclair. Marathon Petroleum's average media sentiment score of 1.58 beat HF Sinclair's score of 1.57 indicating that Marathon Petroleum is being referred to more favorably in the media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment Marathon Petroleum 61 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 1 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Very Positive HF Sinclair 21 Very Positive mention(s) 1 Positive mention(s) 1 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Very Positive

Is MPLX or MPC more profitable?

Mplx has a net margin of 35.75% compared to Marathon Petroleum's net margin of 5.48%. Mplx's return on equity of 32.83% beat Marathon Petroleum's return on equity. Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets Mplx 35.75% 32.83% 10.98% Marathon Petroleum 5.48% 31.96% 8.88%

Does the media favor MPLX or MPC?

In the previous week, Marathon Petroleum had 41 more articles in the media than Mplx. MarketBeat recorded 63 mentions for Marathon Petroleum and 22 mentions for Mplx. Marathon Petroleum's average media sentiment score of 1.58 beat Mplx's score of 0.17 indicating that Marathon Petroleum is being referred to more favorably in the news media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment Mplx 6 Very Positive mention(s) 2 Positive mention(s) 4 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Neutral Marathon Petroleum 61 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 1 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Very Positive

Does the media favor PARR or MPC?

In the previous week, Marathon Petroleum had 60 more articles in the media than Par Pacific. MarketBeat recorded 63 mentions for Marathon Petroleum and 3 mentions for Par Pacific. Marathon Petroleum's average media sentiment score of 1.58 beat Par Pacific's score of 1.03 indicating that Marathon Petroleum is being referred to more favorably in the news media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment Par Pacific 2 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 1 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive Marathon Petroleum 61 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 1 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Very Positive

Which has better earnings and valuation, MPC or PBF?

Marathon Petroleum has higher revenue and earnings than PBF Energy. PBF Energy is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Marathon Petroleum, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks. Company Gross Revenue Price/Sales Ratio Net Income Earnings Per Share Price/Earnings Ratio Marathon Petroleum $153.58B 0.68 $4.05B $29.09 12.36 PBF Energy $29.33B 0.28 -$158.50M $11.30 6.03

Does the media favor MPC or PBF?

In the previous week, Marathon Petroleum had 50 more articles in the media than PBF Energy. MarketBeat recorded 63 mentions for Marathon Petroleum and 13 mentions for PBF Energy. Marathon Petroleum's average media sentiment score of 1.58 beat PBF Energy's score of 0.67 indicating that Marathon Petroleum is being referred to more favorably in the media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment Marathon Petroleum 61 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 1 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Very Positive PBF Energy 7 Very Positive mention(s) 1 Positive mention(s) 0 Neutral mention(s) 1 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive

Does the media prefer MPC or PSX?

In the previous week, Marathon Petroleum had 1 more articles in the media than Phillips 66. MarketBeat recorded 63 mentions for Marathon Petroleum and 62 mentions for Phillips 66. Marathon Petroleum's average media sentiment score of 1.58 beat Phillips 66's score of 1.55 indicating that Marathon Petroleum is being referred to more favorably in the media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment Marathon Petroleum 61 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 1 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Very Positive Phillips 66 57 Very Positive mention(s) 2 Positive mention(s) 2 Neutral mention(s) 1 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Very Positive

Marathon Petroleum (MPC) Competitors

$359.47 -3.05 (-0.84%)

As of 12:05 PM Eastern

Compare

MPC vs. DINO, MPLX, PARR, PBF, and PSX

Should you buy Marathon Petroleum stock or one of its competitors? Marathon Petroleum's main competitors and comparable companies include HF Sinclair (DINO), Mplx (MPLX), Par Pacific (PARR), PBF Energy (PBF), and Phillips 66 (PSX). Companies are selected based on similarities in market, industry, and size. These companies are all part of the "oil, gas & consumable fuels" industry.

How does Marathon Petroleum compare to HF Sinclair?

Marathon Petroleum (NYSE:MPC) and HF Sinclair (NYSE:DINO) are both large-cap energy companies, but which is the better stock? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their risk, earnings, media sentiment, valuation, institutional ownership, dividends, analyst recommendations and profitability.

Marathon Petroleum has higher revenue and earnings than HF Sinclair. HF Sinclair is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Marathon Petroleum, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Marathon Petroleum	$153.58B	0.68	$4.05B	$29.09	12.36
HF Sinclair	$26.87B	0.63	$579M	$10.48	9.05

Marathon Petroleum pays an annual dividend of $4.00 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.1%. HF Sinclair pays an annual dividend of $2.10 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.2%. Marathon Petroleum pays out 13.8% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. HF Sinclair pays out 20.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Marathon Petroleum has increased its dividend for 3 consecutive years and HF Sinclair has increased its dividend for 3 consecutive years.

In the previous week, Marathon Petroleum had 40 more articles in the media than HF Sinclair. MarketBeat recorded 63 mentions for Marathon Petroleum and 23 mentions for HF Sinclair. Marathon Petroleum's average media sentiment score of 1.58 beat HF Sinclair's score of 1.57 indicating that Marathon Petroleum is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Marathon Petroleum	61 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	1 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Very Positive
HF Sinclair	21 Very Positive mention(s)	1 Positive mention(s)	1 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Very Positive

76.8% of Marathon Petroleum shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 88.3% of HF Sinclair shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.2% of Marathon Petroleum shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.3% of HF Sinclair shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

HF Sinclair has a net margin of 6.13% compared to Marathon Petroleum's net margin of 5.48%. Marathon Petroleum's return on equity of 31.96% beat HF Sinclair's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Marathon Petroleum	5.48%	31.96%	8.88%
HF Sinclair	6.13%	18.21%	9.96%

Marathon Petroleum presently has a consensus target price of $312.50, indicating a potential downside of 13.10%. HF Sinclair has a consensus target price of $81.25, indicating a potential downside of 14.32%. Given Marathon Petroleum's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, equities analysts clearly believe Marathon Petroleum is more favorable than HF Sinclair.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Marathon Petroleum	0 Sell rating(s)	6 Hold rating(s)	12 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.67
HF Sinclair	1 Sell rating(s)	7 Hold rating(s)	6 Buy rating(s)	2 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.56

Marathon Petroleum has a beta of 0.52, indicating that its stock price is 48% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, HF Sinclair has a beta of 0.7, indicating that its stock price is 30% less volatile than the broader market.

Summary

Marathon Petroleum beats HF Sinclair on 12 of the 19 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Marathon Petroleum compare to Mplx?

Mplx (NYSE:MPLX) and Marathon Petroleum (NYSE:MPC) are both large-cap energy companies, but which is the better business? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their profitability, valuation, institutional ownership, dividends, risk, media sentiment, analyst recommendations and earnings.

In the previous week, Marathon Petroleum had 41 more articles in the media than Mplx. MarketBeat recorded 63 mentions for Marathon Petroleum and 22 mentions for Mplx. Marathon Petroleum's average media sentiment score of 1.58 beat Mplx's score of 0.17 indicating that Marathon Petroleum is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Mplx	6 Very Positive mention(s)	2 Positive mention(s)	4 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Neutral
Marathon Petroleum	61 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	1 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Very Positive

Mplx currently has a consensus target price of $63.20, indicating a potential upside of 8.33%. Marathon Petroleum has a consensus target price of $312.50, indicating a potential downside of 13.10%. Given Mplx's higher probable upside, equities research analysts clearly believe Mplx is more favorable than Marathon Petroleum.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Mplx	0 Sell rating(s)	6 Hold rating(s)	7 Buy rating(s)	1 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.64
Marathon Petroleum	0 Sell rating(s)	6 Hold rating(s)	12 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.67

Mplx pays an annual dividend of $4.30 per share and has a dividend yield of 7.4%. Marathon Petroleum pays an annual dividend of $4.00 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.1%. Mplx pays out 92.5% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Marathon Petroleum pays out 13.8% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Mplx has increased its dividend for 9 consecutive years and Marathon Petroleum has increased its dividend for 3 consecutive years. Mplx is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

Mplx has a net margin of 35.75% compared to Marathon Petroleum's net margin of 5.48%. Mplx's return on equity of 32.83% beat Marathon Petroleum's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Mplx	35.75%	32.83%	10.98%
Marathon Petroleum	5.48%	31.96%	8.88%

Mplx has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Marathon Petroleum. Marathon Petroleum is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Mplx, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Mplx	$11.69B	5.06	$4.91B	$4.65	12.55
Marathon Petroleum	$153.58B	0.68	$4.05B	$29.09	12.36

24.3% of Mplx shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 76.8% of Marathon Petroleum shares are held by institutional investors. 0.2% of Marathon Petroleum shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Mplx has a beta of 0.48, meaning that its stock price is 52% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Marathon Petroleum has a beta of 0.52, meaning that its stock price is 48% less volatile than the broader market.

Summary

Mplx and Marathon Petroleum tied by winning 10 of the 20 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Marathon Petroleum compare to Par Pacific?

Par Pacific (NYSE:PARR) and Marathon Petroleum (NYSE:MPC) are both energy companies, but which is the superior stock? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their valuation, institutional ownership, risk, dividends, earnings, profitability, media sentiment and analyst recommendations.

Marathon Petroleum has higher revenue and earnings than Par Pacific. Par Pacific is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Marathon Petroleum, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Par Pacific	$7.46B	0.50	$369.39M	$17.14	4.35
Marathon Petroleum	$153.58B	0.68	$4.05B	$29.09	12.36

Par Pacific has a beta of 0.78, indicating that its share price is 22% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Marathon Petroleum has a beta of 0.52, indicating that its share price is 48% less volatile than the broader market.

92.2% of Par Pacific shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 76.8% of Marathon Petroleum shares are owned by institutional investors. 3.6% of Par Pacific shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.2% of Marathon Petroleum shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

In the previous week, Marathon Petroleum had 60 more articles in the media than Par Pacific. MarketBeat recorded 63 mentions for Marathon Petroleum and 3 mentions for Par Pacific. Marathon Petroleum's average media sentiment score of 1.58 beat Par Pacific's score of 1.03 indicating that Marathon Petroleum is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Par Pacific	2 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	1 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive
Marathon Petroleum	61 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	1 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Very Positive

Par Pacific has a net margin of 9.94% compared to Marathon Petroleum's net margin of 5.48%. Par Pacific's return on equity of 56.19% beat Marathon Petroleum's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Par Pacific	9.94%	56.19%	21.61%
Marathon Petroleum	5.48%	31.96%	8.88%

Par Pacific currently has a consensus price target of $81.57, indicating a potential upside of 9.45%. Marathon Petroleum has a consensus price target of $312.50, indicating a potential downside of 13.10%. Given Par Pacific's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, equities analysts clearly believe Par Pacific is more favorable than Marathon Petroleum.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Par Pacific	0 Sell rating(s)	3 Hold rating(s)	10 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.77
Marathon Petroleum	0 Sell rating(s)	6 Hold rating(s)	12 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.67

Summary

Par Pacific and Marathon Petroleum tied by winning 8 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Marathon Petroleum compare to PBF Energy?

Marathon Petroleum (NYSE:MPC) and PBF Energy (NYSE:PBF) are both energy companies, but which is the better business? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their profitability, institutional ownership, media sentiment, earnings, risk, analyst recommendations, dividends and valuation.

In the previous week, Marathon Petroleum had 50 more articles in the media than PBF Energy. MarketBeat recorded 63 mentions for Marathon Petroleum and 13 mentions for PBF Energy. Marathon Petroleum's average media sentiment score of 1.58 beat PBF Energy's score of 0.67 indicating that Marathon Petroleum is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Marathon Petroleum	61 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	1 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Very Positive
PBF Energy	7 Very Positive mention(s)	1 Positive mention(s)	0 Neutral mention(s)	1 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive

Marathon Petroleum currently has a consensus target price of $312.50, indicating a potential downside of 13.10%. PBF Energy has a consensus target price of $50.92, indicating a potential downside of 25.30%. Given Marathon Petroleum's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Marathon Petroleum is more favorable than PBF Energy.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Marathon Petroleum	0 Sell rating(s)	6 Hold rating(s)	12 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.67
PBF Energy	5 Sell rating(s)	8 Hold rating(s)	2 Buy rating(s)	1 Strong Buy rating(s)	1.94

Marathon Petroleum has higher revenue and earnings than PBF Energy. PBF Energy is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Marathon Petroleum, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Marathon Petroleum	$153.58B	0.68	$4.05B	$29.09	12.36
PBF Energy	$29.33B	0.28	-$158.50M	$11.30	6.03

Marathon Petroleum has a net margin of 5.48% compared to PBF Energy's net margin of 3.94%. Marathon Petroleum's return on equity of 31.96% beat PBF Energy's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Marathon Petroleum	5.48%	31.96%	8.88%
PBF Energy	3.94%	11.27%	4.67%

76.8% of Marathon Petroleum shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 96.3% of PBF Energy shares are held by institutional investors. 0.2% of Marathon Petroleum shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 5.5% of PBF Energy shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Marathon Petroleum pays an annual dividend of $4.00 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.1%. PBF Energy pays an annual dividend of $1.10 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.6%. Marathon Petroleum pays out 13.8% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. PBF Energy pays out 9.7% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Marathon Petroleum has raised its dividend for 3 consecutive years and PBF Energy has raised its dividend for 2 consecutive years. PBF Energy is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

Marathon Petroleum has a beta of 0.52, indicating that its stock price is 48% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, PBF Energy has a beta of 0.1, indicating that its stock price is 90% less volatile than the broader market.

Summary

Marathon Petroleum beats PBF Energy on 15 of the 20 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Marathon Petroleum compare to Phillips 66?

Marathon Petroleum (NYSE:MPC) and Phillips 66 (NYSE:PSX) are both large-cap energy companies, but which is the better stock? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their risk, profitability, analyst recommendations, institutional ownership, media sentiment, dividends, valuation and earnings.

Marathon Petroleum has a net margin of 5.48% compared to Phillips 66's net margin of 4.54%. Marathon Petroleum's return on equity of 31.96% beat Phillips 66's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Marathon Petroleum	5.48%	31.96%	8.88%
Phillips 66	4.54%	19.93%	7.62%

Marathon Petroleum has a beta of 0.52, meaning that its stock price is 48% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Phillips 66 has a beta of 0.68, meaning that its stock price is 32% less volatile than the broader market.

Marathon Petroleum pays an annual dividend of $4.00 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.1%. Phillips 66 pays an annual dividend of $5.08 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.1%. Marathon Petroleum pays out 13.8% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Phillips 66 pays out 28.9% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Marathon Petroleum has raised its dividend for 3 consecutive years and Phillips 66 has raised its dividend for 14 consecutive years. Phillips 66 is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

76.8% of Marathon Petroleum shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 76.9% of Phillips 66 shares are held by institutional investors. 0.2% of Marathon Petroleum shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 0.4% of Phillips 66 shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Phillips 66 has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Marathon Petroleum. Marathon Petroleum is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Phillips 66, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Marathon Petroleum	$153.58B	0.68	$4.05B	$29.09	12.36
Phillips 66	$136.56B	0.70	$4.40B	$17.55	13.68

Marathon Petroleum presently has a consensus target price of $312.50, indicating a potential downside of 13.10%. Phillips 66 has a consensus target price of $206.56, indicating a potential downside of 13.96%. Given Marathon Petroleum's higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Marathon Petroleum is more favorable than Phillips 66.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Marathon Petroleum	0 Sell rating(s)	6 Hold rating(s)	12 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.67
Phillips 66	0 Sell rating(s)	8 Hold rating(s)	13 Buy rating(s)	1 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.68

In the previous week, Marathon Petroleum had 1 more articles in the media than Phillips 66. MarketBeat recorded 63 mentions for Marathon Petroleum and 62 mentions for Phillips 66. Marathon Petroleum's average media sentiment score of 1.58 beat Phillips 66's score of 1.55 indicating that Marathon Petroleum is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Marathon Petroleum	61 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	1 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Very Positive
Phillips 66	57 Very Positive mention(s)	2 Positive mention(s)	2 Neutral mention(s)	1 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Very Positive

Summary

Phillips 66 beats Marathon Petroleum on 11 of the 20 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Marathon Petroleum News Delivered to You Automatically

Subscribe Now

SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding MPC and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of NYSE and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.

MPC vs. The Competition

Export

Metric	Marathon Petroleum	Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels Industry	Energy Sector	NYSE Exchange
Market Cap	$104.91B	$11.27B	$9.85B	$24.21B
Dividend Yield	1.12%	11.42%	11.64%	3.70%
P/E Ratio	12.35	16.91	20.32	30.19
Price / Sales	0.68	421.71	346.79	17.41
Price / Cash	16.51	39.68	36.09	19.80
Price / Book	4.49	4.34	3.94	4.90
Net Income	$4.05B	$5.27B	$4.33B	$1.07B
7 Day Performance	-1.96%	0.74%	0.23%	0.44%
1 Month Performance	16.32%	4.19%	3.56%	2.79%
1 Year Performance	108.75%	35.46%	36.95%	14.88%

Marathon Petroleum Competitors List

Export

Company	MarketRank	Share Price	Analysts' Price Target	1Y Price Performance	Market Cap	Revenue	P/E Ratio	Employee Count	Indicator(s)
MPC Marathon Petroleum	4.0995 of 5 stars	$359.60 -0.8%	$312.50 -13.1%	+112.5%	$104.91B	$153.58B	12.35	18,500	Positive News Insider Trade
DINO HF Sinclair	3.6376 of 5 stars	$93.65 0.0%	$81.25 -13.2%	+96.6%	$16.65B	$26.87B	8.94	5,165	News Coverage Positive News
MPLX Mplx	3.7212 of 5 stars	$59.45 0.0%	$62.80 +5.6%	+15.3%	$60.27B	$13.00B	12.79	5,762	Analyst Revision
PARR Par Pacific	2.4659 of 5 stars	$80.33 +0.0%	$81.57 +1.5%	+139.0%	$4.02B	$7.46B	4.69	1,758	Positive News
PBF PBF Energy	3.8462 of 5 stars	$71.88 +0.0%	$50.15 -30.2%	+186.4%	$8.52B	$29.33B	6.36	3,678

Related Companies and Tools

Related Companies

Top 10 Stock Comparisons

This page (NYSE:MPC) was last updated on 8/25/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.

From Our Partners

Unlock superior investment research and tools.

Get MarketBeat All Access

In-depth profiles and analysis for 20,000 public companies.
Real-time analyst ratings, insider transactions, earnings data, and more.
Our daily ratings and market update email newsletter.

Sign In
Create Account

Your Email Address:

Your Password:

Forgot your password?

Your Email Address:

Choose a Password:

By creating a free account, you agree to our terms of service. This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

Marathon Petroleum (MPC) Competitors

MPC vs. DINO, MPLX, PARR, PBF, and PSX

How does Marathon Petroleum compare to HF Sinclair?

Summary

How does Marathon Petroleum compare to Mplx?

Summary

How does Marathon Petroleum compare to Par Pacific?

Summary

How does Marathon Petroleum compare to PBF Energy?

Summary

How does Marathon Petroleum compare to Phillips 66?

Summary

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

Media Sentiment Over Time

MPC vs. The Competition

Marathon Petroleum Competitors List

Related Companies and Tools

Best-in-Class Portfolio Monitoring

Stock Ideas and Recommendations

Advanced Stock Screeners and Research Tools

About MarketBeat

MarketBeat Products

Popular Tools

Financial Calendars

Terms & Info

Marathon Petroleum (MPC) Competitors

MPC vs. DINO, MPLX, PARR, PBF, and PSX

How does Marathon Petroleum compare to HF Sinclair?

Which has higher valuation & earnings, MPC or DINO?

Is MPC or DINO a better dividend stock?

Does the media refer more to MPC or DINO?

Do institutionals & insiders have more ownership in MPC or DINO?

Is MPC or DINO more profitable?

Do analysts recommend MPC or DINO?

Which has more volatility & risk, MPC or DINO?

Summary

How does Marathon Petroleum compare to Mplx?

Does the media favor MPLX or MPC?

Do analysts recommend MPLX or MPC?

Is MPLX or MPC a better dividend stock?

Is MPLX or MPC more profitable?

Which has higher earnings and valuation, MPLX or MPC?

Do insiders & institutionals have more ownership in MPLX or MPC?

Which has more volatility & risk, MPLX or MPC?

Summary

How does Marathon Petroleum compare to Par Pacific?

Which has preferable valuation and earnings, PARR or MPC?

Which has more risk and volatility, PARR or MPC?

Do insiders and institutionals have more ownership in PARR or MPC?

Does the media favor PARR or MPC?

Is PARR or MPC more profitable?

Do analysts rate PARR or MPC?

Summary

How does Marathon Petroleum compare to PBF Energy?

Does the media favor MPC or PBF?

Do analysts rate MPC or PBF?

Which has better earnings and valuation, MPC or PBF?

Is MPC or PBF more profitable?

Do institutionals and insiders believe in MPC or PBF?

Is MPC or PBF a better dividend stock?

Which has more risk & volatility, MPC or PBF?

Summary

How does Marathon Petroleum compare to Phillips 66?

Is MPC or PSX more profitable?

Which has more volatility and risk, MPC or PSX?

Is MPC or PSX a better dividend stock?

Do institutionals & insiders have more ownership in MPC or PSX?

Which has higher earnings and valuation, MPC or PSX?

Do analysts prefer MPC or PSX?

Does the media prefer MPC or PSX?

Summary

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

Media Sentiment Over Time

MPC vs. The Competition

Marathon Petroleum Competitors List

Related Companies and Tools

MarketBeat All Access Features

Best-in-Class Portfolio Monitoring

Stock Ideas and Recommendations

Advanced Stock Screeners and Research Tools