Does the media favor DINO or MPC?

In the previous week, Marathon Petroleum had 17 more articles in the media than HF Sinclair. MarketBeat recorded 27 mentions for Marathon Petroleum and 10 mentions for HF Sinclair. HF Sinclair's average media sentiment score of 1.37 beat Marathon Petroleum's score of 0.99 indicating that HF Sinclair is being referred to more favorably in the media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment HF Sinclair 7 Very Positive mention(s) 3 Positive mention(s) 0 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive Marathon Petroleum 17 Very Positive mention(s) 2 Positive mention(s) 6 Neutral mention(s) 2 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive

Is MPLX or MPC more profitable?

Mplx has a net margin of 35.75% compared to Marathon Petroleum's net margin of 5.48%. Mplx's return on equity of 32.83% beat Marathon Petroleum's return on equity. Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets Mplx 35.75% 32.83% 10.98% Marathon Petroleum 5.48% 31.96% 8.88%

Does the media refer more to MPLX or MPC?

In the previous week, Marathon Petroleum had 19 more articles in the media than Mplx. MarketBeat recorded 27 mentions for Marathon Petroleum and 8 mentions for Mplx. Mplx's average media sentiment score of 1.07 beat Marathon Petroleum's score of 0.99 indicating that Mplx is being referred to more favorably in the media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment Mplx 4 Very Positive mention(s) 1 Positive mention(s) 2 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive Marathon Petroleum 17 Very Positive mention(s) 2 Positive mention(s) 6 Neutral mention(s) 2 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive

Does the media prefer MPC or PARR?

In the previous week, Marathon Petroleum had 14 more articles in the media than Par Pacific. MarketBeat recorded 27 mentions for Marathon Petroleum and 13 mentions for Par Pacific. Marathon Petroleum's average media sentiment score of 0.99 beat Par Pacific's score of 0.72 indicating that Marathon Petroleum is being referred to more favorably in the media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment Marathon Petroleum 17 Very Positive mention(s) 2 Positive mention(s) 6 Neutral mention(s) 2 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive Par Pacific 8 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 3 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive

Which has higher valuation & earnings, MPC or PBF?

Marathon Petroleum has higher revenue and earnings than PBF Energy. PBF Energy is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Marathon Petroleum, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks. Company Gross Revenue Price/Sales Ratio Net Income Earnings Per Share Price/Earnings Ratio Marathon Petroleum $135.22B 0.85 $4.05B $29.09 13.47 PBF Energy $34.37B 0.25 -$158.50M $11.30 6.36

Does the media favor MPC or PBF?

In the previous week, Marathon Petroleum had 12 more articles in the media than PBF Energy. MarketBeat recorded 27 mentions for Marathon Petroleum and 15 mentions for PBF Energy. Marathon Petroleum's average media sentiment score of 0.99 beat PBF Energy's score of 0.62 indicating that Marathon Petroleum is being referred to more favorably in the media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment Marathon Petroleum 17 Very Positive mention(s) 2 Positive mention(s) 6 Neutral mention(s) 2 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive PBF Energy 7 Very Positive mention(s) 5 Positive mention(s) 1 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive

Which has better earnings & valuation, MPC or PSX?

Phillips 66 has higher revenue and earnings than Marathon Petroleum. Marathon Petroleum is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Phillips 66, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks. Company Gross Revenue Price/Sales Ratio Net Income Earnings Per Share Price/Earnings Ratio Marathon Petroleum $135.22B 0.85 $4.05B $29.09 13.47 Phillips 66 $136.56B 0.75 $4.40B $17.55 14.56

Does the media favor MPC or PSX?

In the previous week, Phillips 66 had 5 more articles in the media than Marathon Petroleum. MarketBeat recorded 32 mentions for Phillips 66 and 27 mentions for Marathon Petroleum. Phillips 66's average media sentiment score of 1.20 beat Marathon Petroleum's score of 0.99 indicating that Phillips 66 is being referred to more favorably in the news media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment Marathon Petroleum 17 Very Positive mention(s) 2 Positive mention(s) 6 Neutral mention(s) 2 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive Phillips 66 21 Very Positive mention(s) 5 Positive mention(s) 3 Neutral mention(s) 1 Negative mention(s) 1 Very Negative mention(s) Positive

Marathon Petroleum (MPC) Competitors

$392.38 -3.56 (-0.90%)

As of 01:49 PM Eastern

Compare

MPC vs. DINO, MPLX, PARR, PBF, and PSX

Should you buy Marathon Petroleum stock or one of its competitors? Marathon Petroleum's main competitors and comparable companies include HF Sinclair (DINO), Mplx (MPLX), Par Pacific (PARR), PBF Energy (PBF), and Phillips 66 (PSX). Companies are selected based on similarities in market, industry, and size. These companies are all part of the "oil, gas & consumable fuels" industry.

How does Marathon Petroleum compare to HF Sinclair?

HF Sinclair (NYSE:DINO) and Marathon Petroleum (NYSE:MPC) are both large-cap energy companies, but which is the better investment? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their earnings, risk, valuation, media sentiment, dividends, analyst recommendations, institutional ownership and profitability.

In the previous week, Marathon Petroleum had 17 more articles in the media than HF Sinclair. MarketBeat recorded 27 mentions for Marathon Petroleum and 10 mentions for HF Sinclair. HF Sinclair's average media sentiment score of 1.37 beat Marathon Petroleum's score of 0.99 indicating that HF Sinclair is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
HF Sinclair	7 Very Positive mention(s)	3 Positive mention(s)	0 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive
Marathon Petroleum	17 Very Positive mention(s)	2 Positive mention(s)	6 Neutral mention(s)	2 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive

HF Sinclair currently has a consensus target price of $91.33, suggesting a potential downside of 14.10%. Marathon Petroleum has a consensus target price of $342.25, suggesting a potential downside of 12.66%. Given Marathon Petroleum's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Marathon Petroleum is more favorable than HF Sinclair.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
HF Sinclair	1 Sell rating(s)	7 Hold rating(s)	6 Buy rating(s)	2 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.56
Marathon Petroleum	0 Sell rating(s)	4 Hold rating(s)	12 Buy rating(s)	1 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.82

Marathon Petroleum has higher revenue and earnings than HF Sinclair. HF Sinclair is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Marathon Petroleum, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
HF Sinclair	$26.87B	0.70	$579M	$10.48	10.15
Marathon Petroleum	$135.22B	0.85	$4.05B	$29.09	13.47

HF Sinclair has a beta of 0.71, indicating that its share price is 29% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Marathon Petroleum has a beta of 0.53, indicating that its share price is 47% less volatile than the broader market.

88.3% of HF Sinclair shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 76.8% of Marathon Petroleum shares are held by institutional investors. 0.3% of HF Sinclair shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.2% of Marathon Petroleum shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

HF Sinclair pays an annual dividend of $2.10 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.0%. Marathon Petroleum pays an annual dividend of $4.00 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.0%. HF Sinclair pays out 20.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Marathon Petroleum pays out 13.8% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. HF Sinclair has increased its dividend for 3 consecutive years and Marathon Petroleum has increased its dividend for 3 consecutive years.

HF Sinclair has a net margin of 6.13% compared to Marathon Petroleum's net margin of 5.48%. Marathon Petroleum's return on equity of 31.96% beat HF Sinclair's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
HF Sinclair	6.13%	18.21%	9.96%
Marathon Petroleum	5.48%	31.96%	8.88%

Summary

Marathon Petroleum beats HF Sinclair on 11 of the 19 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Marathon Petroleum compare to Mplx?

Mplx (NYSE:MPLX) and Marathon Petroleum (NYSE:MPC) are both large-cap energy companies, but which is the superior stock? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their institutional ownership, valuation, earnings, media sentiment, analyst recommendations, profitability, risk and dividends.

Mplx has a beta of 0.48, meaning that its share price is 52% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Marathon Petroleum has a beta of 0.53, meaning that its share price is 47% less volatile than the broader market.

Mplx pays an annual dividend of $4.31 per share and has a dividend yield of 7.3%. Marathon Petroleum pays an annual dividend of $4.00 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.0%. Mplx pays out 92.7% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Marathon Petroleum pays out 13.8% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Mplx has increased its dividend for 9 consecutive years and Marathon Petroleum has increased its dividend for 3 consecutive years. Mplx is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

Mplx has a net margin of 35.75% compared to Marathon Petroleum's net margin of 5.48%. Mplx's return on equity of 32.83% beat Marathon Petroleum's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Mplx	35.75%	32.83%	10.98%
Marathon Petroleum	5.48%	31.96%	8.88%

In the previous week, Marathon Petroleum had 19 more articles in the media than Mplx. MarketBeat recorded 27 mentions for Marathon Petroleum and 8 mentions for Mplx. Mplx's average media sentiment score of 1.07 beat Marathon Petroleum's score of 0.99 indicating that Mplx is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Mplx	4 Very Positive mention(s)	1 Positive mention(s)	2 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive
Marathon Petroleum	17 Very Positive mention(s)	2 Positive mention(s)	6 Neutral mention(s)	2 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive

Mplx has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Marathon Petroleum. Mplx is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Marathon Petroleum, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Mplx	$13.00B	4.62	$4.91B	$4.65	12.73
Marathon Petroleum	$135.22B	0.85	$4.05B	$29.09	13.47

24.3% of Mplx shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 76.8% of Marathon Petroleum shares are held by institutional investors. 0.2% of Marathon Petroleum shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Mplx currently has a consensus target price of $63.80, indicating a potential upside of 7.78%. Marathon Petroleum has a consensus target price of $342.25, indicating a potential downside of 12.66%. Given Mplx's higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Mplx is more favorable than Marathon Petroleum.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Mplx	0 Sell rating(s)	7 Hold rating(s)	6 Buy rating(s)	1 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.57
Marathon Petroleum	0 Sell rating(s)	4 Hold rating(s)	12 Buy rating(s)	1 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.82

Summary

Marathon Petroleum beats Mplx on 10 of the 19 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Marathon Petroleum compare to Par Pacific?

Marathon Petroleum (NYSE:MPC) and Par Pacific (NYSE:PARR) are both energy companies, but which is the better stock? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their media sentiment, valuation, profitability, dividends, analyst recommendations, risk, earnings and institutional ownership.

Marathon Petroleum currently has a consensus price target of $342.25, suggesting a potential downside of 12.66%. Par Pacific has a consensus price target of $84.29, suggesting a potential upside of 4.85%. Given Par Pacific's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Par Pacific is more favorable than Marathon Petroleum.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Marathon Petroleum	0 Sell rating(s)	4 Hold rating(s)	12 Buy rating(s)	1 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.82
Par Pacific	0 Sell rating(s)	1 Hold rating(s)	11 Buy rating(s)	1 Strong Buy rating(s)	3.00

76.8% of Marathon Petroleum shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 92.2% of Par Pacific shares are held by institutional investors. 0.2% of Marathon Petroleum shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 3.6% of Par Pacific shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Marathon Petroleum has a beta of 0.53, suggesting that its share price is 47% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Par Pacific has a beta of 0.77, suggesting that its share price is 23% less volatile than the broader market.

Par Pacific has a net margin of 9.94% compared to Marathon Petroleum's net margin of 5.48%. Par Pacific's return on equity of 56.19% beat Marathon Petroleum's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Marathon Petroleum	5.48%	31.96%	8.88%
Par Pacific	9.94%	56.19%	21.61%

In the previous week, Marathon Petroleum had 14 more articles in the media than Par Pacific. MarketBeat recorded 27 mentions for Marathon Petroleum and 13 mentions for Par Pacific. Marathon Petroleum's average media sentiment score of 0.99 beat Par Pacific's score of 0.72 indicating that Marathon Petroleum is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Marathon Petroleum	17 Very Positive mention(s)	2 Positive mention(s)	6 Neutral mention(s)	2 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive
Par Pacific	8 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	3 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive

Marathon Petroleum has higher revenue and earnings than Par Pacific. Par Pacific is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Marathon Petroleum, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Marathon Petroleum	$135.22B	0.85	$4.05B	$29.09	13.47
Par Pacific	$7.46B	0.54	$369.39M	$17.14	4.69

Summary

Marathon Petroleum and Par Pacific tied by winning 8 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Marathon Petroleum compare to PBF Energy?

Marathon Petroleum (NYSE:MPC) and PBF Energy (NYSE:PBF) are both energy companies, but which is the superior investment? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, dividends, profitability, earnings, institutional ownership, media sentiment, valuation and risk.

Marathon Petroleum has a beta of 0.53, suggesting that its share price is 47% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, PBF Energy has a beta of 0.09, suggesting that its share price is 91% less volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, Marathon Petroleum had 12 more articles in the media than PBF Energy. MarketBeat recorded 27 mentions for Marathon Petroleum and 15 mentions for PBF Energy. Marathon Petroleum's average media sentiment score of 0.99 beat PBF Energy's score of 0.62 indicating that Marathon Petroleum is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Marathon Petroleum	17 Very Positive mention(s)	2 Positive mention(s)	6 Neutral mention(s)	2 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive
PBF Energy	7 Very Positive mention(s)	5 Positive mention(s)	1 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive

Marathon Petroleum has a net margin of 5.48% compared to PBF Energy's net margin of 3.94%. Marathon Petroleum's return on equity of 31.96% beat PBF Energy's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Marathon Petroleum	5.48%	31.96%	8.88%
PBF Energy	3.94%	11.27%	4.67%

Marathon Petroleum has higher revenue and earnings than PBF Energy. PBF Energy is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Marathon Petroleum, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Marathon Petroleum	$135.22B	0.85	$4.05B	$29.09	13.47
PBF Energy	$34.37B	0.25	-$158.50M	$11.30	6.36

Marathon Petroleum pays an annual dividend of $4.00 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.0%. PBF Energy pays an annual dividend of $1.10 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.5%. Marathon Petroleum pays out 13.8% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. PBF Energy pays out 9.7% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Marathon Petroleum has increased its dividend for 3 consecutive years and PBF Energy has increased its dividend for 2 consecutive years. PBF Energy is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

Marathon Petroleum presently has a consensus target price of $342.25, indicating a potential downside of 12.66%. PBF Energy has a consensus target price of $56.58, indicating a potential downside of 21.29%. Given Marathon Petroleum's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, equities research analysts plainly believe Marathon Petroleum is more favorable than PBF Energy.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Marathon Petroleum	0 Sell rating(s)	4 Hold rating(s)	12 Buy rating(s)	1 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.82
PBF Energy	4 Sell rating(s)	8 Hold rating(s)	2 Buy rating(s)	1 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.00

76.8% of Marathon Petroleum shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 96.3% of PBF Energy shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.2% of Marathon Petroleum shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 5.5% of PBF Energy shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Summary

Marathon Petroleum beats PBF Energy on 15 of the 19 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Marathon Petroleum compare to Phillips 66?

Marathon Petroleum (NYSE:MPC) and Phillips 66 (NYSE:PSX) are both large-cap energy companies, but which is the superior business? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their risk, analyst recommendations, media sentiment, earnings, valuation, institutional ownership, dividends and profitability.

76.8% of Marathon Petroleum shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 76.9% of Phillips 66 shares are held by institutional investors. 0.2% of Marathon Petroleum shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.4% of Phillips 66 shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Marathon Petroleum has a beta of 0.53, suggesting that its stock price is 47% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Phillips 66 has a beta of 0.71, suggesting that its stock price is 29% less volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, Phillips 66 had 5 more articles in the media than Marathon Petroleum. MarketBeat recorded 32 mentions for Phillips 66 and 27 mentions for Marathon Petroleum. Phillips 66's average media sentiment score of 1.20 beat Marathon Petroleum's score of 0.99 indicating that Phillips 66 is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Marathon Petroleum	17 Very Positive mention(s)	2 Positive mention(s)	6 Neutral mention(s)	2 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive
Phillips 66	21 Very Positive mention(s)	5 Positive mention(s)	3 Neutral mention(s)	1 Negative mention(s)	1 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive

Marathon Petroleum has a net margin of 5.48% compared to Phillips 66's net margin of 4.54%. Marathon Petroleum's return on equity of 31.96% beat Phillips 66's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Marathon Petroleum	5.48%	31.96%	8.88%
Phillips 66	4.54%	19.93%	7.62%

Phillips 66 has higher revenue and earnings than Marathon Petroleum. Marathon Petroleum is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Phillips 66, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Marathon Petroleum	$135.22B	0.85	$4.05B	$29.09	13.47
Phillips 66	$136.56B	0.75	$4.40B	$17.55	14.56

Marathon Petroleum presently has a consensus target price of $342.25, suggesting a potential downside of 12.66%. Phillips 66 has a consensus target price of $231.76, suggesting a potential downside of 9.28%. Given Phillips 66's higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Phillips 66 is more favorable than Marathon Petroleum.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Marathon Petroleum	0 Sell rating(s)	4 Hold rating(s)	12 Buy rating(s)	1 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.82
Phillips 66	0 Sell rating(s)	6 Hold rating(s)	13 Buy rating(s)	2 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.81

Marathon Petroleum pays an annual dividend of $4.00 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.0%. Phillips 66 pays an annual dividend of $5.08 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.0%. Marathon Petroleum pays out 13.8% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Phillips 66 pays out 28.9% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Marathon Petroleum has raised its dividend for 3 consecutive years and Phillips 66 has raised its dividend for 14 consecutive years. Phillips 66 is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

Summary

Phillips 66 beats Marathon Petroleum on 13 of the 20 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Marathon Petroleum News Delivered to You Automatically

Subscribe Now

SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding MPC and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of NYSE and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.

MPC vs. The Competition

Export

Metric	Marathon Petroleum	Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels Industry	Energy Sector	NYSE Exchange
Market Cap	$114.13B	$11.67B	$10.17B	$23.25B
Dividend Yield	1.01%	10.10%	10.57%	3.58%
P/E Ratio	13.44	18.62	21.60	28.63
Price / Sales	0.85	606.12	495.47	21.44
Price / Cash	18.12	39.84	36.18	19.47
Price / Book	4.89	4.59	4.14	4.75
Net Income	$4.05B	$5.28B	$4.34B	$1.07B
7 Day Performance	0.51%	1.22%	0.83%	-2.23%
1 Month Performance	10.19%	5.17%	3.62%	-3.48%
1 Year Performance	117.48%	38.92%	39.36%	9.96%

Marathon Petroleum Competitors List

Export

Company	MarketRank	Share Price	Analysts' Price Target	1Y Price Performance	Market Cap	Revenue	P/E Ratio	Employee Count	Indicator(s)
MPC Marathon Petroleum	4.1191 of 5 stars	$392.38 -0.9%	$349.13 -11.0%	+119.9%	$114.27B	$135.22B	13.45	18,500	Analyst Forecast
DINO HF Sinclair	2.817 of 5 stars	$105.62 +0.2%	$83.42 -21.0%	+111.5%	$18.78B	$26.87B	10.08	5,165	Positive News Analyst Forecast
MPLX Mplx	3.822 of 5 stars	$59.68 +0.0%	$63.20 +5.9%	+17.3%	$60.51B	$13.00B	12.83	5,762	Positive News
PARR Par Pacific	2.1685 of 5 stars	$81.57 +0.3%	$81.57 +0.0%	+157.7%	$4.09B	$7.46B	4.76	1,758	Analyst Forecast Insider Trade Gap Up
PBF PBF Energy	2.8318 of 5 stars	$74.57 +0.3%	$53.42 -28.4%	+184.7%	$8.84B	$29.33B	6.60	3,678	Analyst Forecast Insider Trade

Related Companies and Tools

Related Companies

Top 10 Stock Comparisons

This page (NYSE:MPC) was last updated on 9/14/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.

From Our Partners

Unlock superior investment research and tools.

Get MarketBeat All Access

In-depth profiles and analysis for 20,000 public companies.
Real-time analyst ratings, insider transactions, earnings data, and more.
Our daily ratings and market update email newsletter.

Sign In
Create Account

Your Email Address:

Your Password:

Forgot your password?

Your Email Address:

Choose a Password:

By creating a free account, you agree to our terms of service. This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

Marathon Petroleum (MPC) Competitors

MPC vs. DINO, MPLX, PARR, PBF, and PSX

How does Marathon Petroleum compare to HF Sinclair?

Summary

How does Marathon Petroleum compare to Mplx?

Summary

How does Marathon Petroleum compare to Par Pacific?

Summary

How does Marathon Petroleum compare to PBF Energy?

Summary

How does Marathon Petroleum compare to Phillips 66?

Summary

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

Media Sentiment Over Time

MPC vs. The Competition

Marathon Petroleum Competitors List

Related Companies and Tools

Best-in-Class Portfolio Monitoring

Stock Ideas and Recommendations

Advanced Stock Screeners and Research Tools

About MarketBeat

MarketBeat Products

Popular Tools

Financial Calendars

Terms & Info

Marathon Petroleum (MPC) Competitors

MPC vs. DINO, MPLX, PARR, PBF, and PSX

How does Marathon Petroleum compare to HF Sinclair?

Does the media favor DINO or MPC?

Do analysts rate DINO or MPC?

Which has higher valuation and earnings, DINO or MPC?

Which has more risk and volatility, DINO or MPC?

Do insiders & institutionals believe in DINO or MPC?

Is DINO or MPC a better dividend stock?

Is DINO or MPC more profitable?

Summary

How does Marathon Petroleum compare to Mplx?

Which has more risk & volatility, MPLX or MPC?

Is MPLX or MPC a better dividend stock?

Is MPLX or MPC more profitable?

Does the media refer more to MPLX or MPC?

Which has higher earnings & valuation, MPLX or MPC?

Do institutionals & insiders hold more shares of MPLX or MPC?

Do analysts rate MPLX or MPC?

Summary

How does Marathon Petroleum compare to Par Pacific?

Do analysts prefer MPC or PARR?

Do insiders and institutionals have more ownership in MPC or PARR?

Which has more volatility and risk, MPC or PARR?

Is MPC or PARR more profitable?

Does the media prefer MPC or PARR?

Which has better valuation & earnings, MPC or PARR?

Summary

How does Marathon Petroleum compare to PBF Energy?

Which has more volatility and risk, MPC or PBF?

Does the media favor MPC or PBF?

Is MPC or PBF more profitable?

Which has higher valuation & earnings, MPC or PBF?

Is MPC or PBF a better dividend stock?

Do analysts recommend MPC or PBF?

Do insiders & institutionals have more ownership in MPC or PBF?

Summary

How does Marathon Petroleum compare to Phillips 66?

Do insiders & institutionals believe in MPC or PSX?

Which has more risk & volatility, MPC or PSX?

Does the media favor MPC or PSX?

Is MPC or PSX more profitable?

Which has better earnings & valuation, MPC or PSX?

Do analysts rate MPC or PSX?

Is MPC or PSX a better dividend stock?

Summary

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

Media Sentiment Over Time

MPC vs. The Competition

Marathon Petroleum Competitors List

Related Companies and Tools

MarketBeat All Access Features

Best-in-Class Portfolio Monitoring

Stock Ideas and Recommendations

Advanced Stock Screeners and Research Tools