Does the media prefer MPC or DINO?

In the previous week, Marathon Petroleum had 7 more articles in the media than HF Sinclair. MarketBeat recorded 13 mentions for Marathon Petroleum and 6 mentions for HF Sinclair. HF Sinclair's average media sentiment score of 0.94 beat Marathon Petroleum's score of 0.87 indicating that HF Sinclair is being referred to more favorably in the news media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment Marathon Petroleum 8 Very Positive mention(s) 1 Positive mention(s) 3 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive HF Sinclair 3 Very Positive mention(s) 1 Positive mention(s) 2 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive

Is MPLX or MPC more profitable?

Mplx has a net margin of 35.75% compared to Marathon Petroleum's net margin of 5.48%. Mplx's return on equity of 32.83% beat Marathon Petroleum's return on equity. Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets Mplx 35.75% 32.83% 10.98% Marathon Petroleum 5.48% 31.96% 8.88%

Does the media prefer MPLX or MPC?

In the previous week, Mplx had 2 more articles in the media than Marathon Petroleum. MarketBeat recorded 15 mentions for Mplx and 13 mentions for Marathon Petroleum. Marathon Petroleum's average media sentiment score of 0.87 beat Mplx's score of 0.41 indicating that Marathon Petroleum is being referred to more favorably in the news media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment Mplx 5 Very Positive mention(s) 4 Positive mention(s) 4 Neutral mention(s) 2 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Neutral Marathon Petroleum 8 Very Positive mention(s) 1 Positive mention(s) 3 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive

Does the media refer more to PARR or MPC?

In the previous week, Marathon Petroleum had 5 more articles in the media than Par Pacific. MarketBeat recorded 13 mentions for Marathon Petroleum and 8 mentions for Par Pacific. Marathon Petroleum's average media sentiment score of 0.87 beat Par Pacific's score of 0.07 indicating that Marathon Petroleum is being referred to more favorably in the news media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment Par Pacific 0 Very Positive mention(s) 1 Positive mention(s) 7 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Neutral Marathon Petroleum 8 Very Positive mention(s) 1 Positive mention(s) 3 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive

Which has preferable valuation and earnings, PBF or MPC?

Marathon Petroleum has higher revenue and earnings than PBF Energy. PBF Energy is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Marathon Petroleum, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks. Company Gross Revenue Price/Sales Ratio Net Income Earnings Per Share Price/Earnings Ratio PBF Energy $29.33B 0.33 -$158.50M $11.30 7.13 Marathon Petroleum $135.22B 0.91 $4.05B $29.09 14.50

Does the media refer more to PBF or MPC?

In the previous week, Marathon Petroleum had 3 more articles in the media than PBF Energy. MarketBeat recorded 13 mentions for Marathon Petroleum and 10 mentions for PBF Energy. PBF Energy's average media sentiment score of 0.97 beat Marathon Petroleum's score of 0.87 indicating that PBF Energy is being referred to more favorably in the media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment PBF Energy 5 Very Positive mention(s) 4 Positive mention(s) 1 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive Marathon Petroleum 8 Very Positive mention(s) 1 Positive mention(s) 3 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive

Which has preferable earnings & valuation, MPC or PSX?

Phillips 66 has higher revenue and earnings than Marathon Petroleum. Marathon Petroleum is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Phillips 66, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks. Company Gross Revenue Price/Sales Ratio Net Income Earnings Per Share Price/Earnings Ratio Marathon Petroleum $135.22B 0.91 $4.05B $29.09 14.50 Phillips 66 $136.56B 0.77 $4.40B $17.55 15.07

Does the media prefer MPC or PSX?

In the previous week, Phillips 66 had 5 more articles in the media than Marathon Petroleum. MarketBeat recorded 18 mentions for Phillips 66 and 13 mentions for Marathon Petroleum. Marathon Petroleum's average media sentiment score of 0.87 beat Phillips 66's score of 0.46 indicating that Marathon Petroleum is being referred to more favorably in the media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment Marathon Petroleum 8 Very Positive mention(s) 1 Positive mention(s) 3 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive Phillips 66 2 Very Positive mention(s) 7 Positive mention(s) 5 Neutral mention(s) 2 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Neutral

Marathon Petroleum (MPC) Competitors

$421.93 +1.78 (+0.42%)

Closing price 10/2/2026 03:59 PM Eastern

Extended Trading

$422.55 +0.62 (+0.15%)

As of 10/2/2026 07:55 PM Eastern

Compare

MPC vs. DINO, MPLX, PARR, PBF, and PSX

Should you buy Marathon Petroleum stock or one of its competitors? Marathon Petroleum's main competitors and comparable companies include HF Sinclair (DINO), Mplx (MPLX), Par Pacific (PARR), PBF Energy (PBF), and Phillips 66 (PSX). Companies are selected based on similarities in market, industry, and size. These companies are all part of the "oil, gas & consumable fuels" industry.

How does Marathon Petroleum compare to HF Sinclair?

Marathon Petroleum (NYSE:MPC) and HF Sinclair (NYSE:DINO) are both large-cap energy companies, but which is the superior business? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, valuation, institutional ownership, media sentiment, risk, profitability, dividends and earnings.

Marathon Petroleum has a beta of 0.54, indicating that its stock price is 46% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, HF Sinclair has a beta of 0.72, indicating that its stock price is 28% less volatile than the broader market.

Marathon Petroleum pays an annual dividend of $4.00 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.9%. HF Sinclair pays an annual dividend of $2.10 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.9%. Marathon Petroleum pays out 13.8% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. HF Sinclair pays out 20.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Marathon Petroleum has increased its dividend for 3 consecutive years and HF Sinclair has increased its dividend for 3 consecutive years.

In the previous week, Marathon Petroleum had 7 more articles in the media than HF Sinclair. MarketBeat recorded 13 mentions for Marathon Petroleum and 6 mentions for HF Sinclair. HF Sinclair's average media sentiment score of 0.94 beat Marathon Petroleum's score of 0.87 indicating that HF Sinclair is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Marathon Petroleum	8 Very Positive mention(s)	1 Positive mention(s)	3 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive
HF Sinclair	3 Very Positive mention(s)	1 Positive mention(s)	2 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive

Marathon Petroleum has higher revenue and earnings than HF Sinclair. HF Sinclair is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Marathon Petroleum, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Marathon Petroleum	$135.22B	0.91	$4.05B	$29.09	14.50
HF Sinclair	$26.87B	0.75	$579M	$10.48	10.80

HF Sinclair has a net margin of 6.13% compared to Marathon Petroleum's net margin of 5.48%. Marathon Petroleum's return on equity of 31.96% beat HF Sinclair's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Marathon Petroleum	5.48%	31.96%	8.88%
HF Sinclair	6.13%	18.21%	9.96%

Marathon Petroleum presently has a consensus price target of $370.38, indicating a potential downside of 12.22%. HF Sinclair has a consensus price target of $94.83, indicating a potential downside of 16.19%. Given Marathon Petroleum's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, research analysts plainly believe Marathon Petroleum is more favorable than HF Sinclair.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Marathon Petroleum	0 Sell rating(s)	5 Hold rating(s)	11 Buy rating(s)	1 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.76
HF Sinclair	1 Sell rating(s)	7 Hold rating(s)	6 Buy rating(s)	2 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.56

76.8% of Marathon Petroleum shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 88.3% of HF Sinclair shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.2% of Marathon Petroleum shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 0.3% of HF Sinclair shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Summary

Marathon Petroleum beats HF Sinclair on 11 of the 19 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Marathon Petroleum compare to Mplx?

Mplx (NYSE:MPLX) and Marathon Petroleum (NYSE:MPC) are both large-cap energy companies, but which is the better business? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their institutional ownership, profitability, valuation, analyst recommendations, media sentiment, earnings, risk and dividends.

Mplx pays an annual dividend of $4.31 per share and has a dividend yield of 7.6%. Marathon Petroleum pays an annual dividend of $4.00 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.9%. Mplx pays out 92.7% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Marathon Petroleum pays out 13.8% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Mplx has increased its dividend for 9 consecutive years and Marathon Petroleum has increased its dividend for 3 consecutive years. Mplx is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

Mplx presently has a consensus target price of $63.80, suggesting a potential upside of 13.11%. Marathon Petroleum has a consensus target price of $370.38, suggesting a potential downside of 12.22%. Given Mplx's higher possible upside, equities research analysts clearly believe Mplx is more favorable than Marathon Petroleum.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Mplx	0 Sell rating(s)	7 Hold rating(s)	6 Buy rating(s)	1 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.57
Marathon Petroleum	0 Sell rating(s)	5 Hold rating(s)	11 Buy rating(s)	1 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.76

Mplx has a beta of 0.49, suggesting that its stock price is 51% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Marathon Petroleum has a beta of 0.54, suggesting that its stock price is 46% less volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, Mplx had 2 more articles in the media than Marathon Petroleum. MarketBeat recorded 15 mentions for Mplx and 13 mentions for Marathon Petroleum. Marathon Petroleum's average media sentiment score of 0.87 beat Mplx's score of 0.41 indicating that Marathon Petroleum is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Mplx	5 Very Positive mention(s)	4 Positive mention(s)	4 Neutral mention(s)	2 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Neutral
Marathon Petroleum	8 Very Positive mention(s)	1 Positive mention(s)	3 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive

Mplx has a net margin of 35.75% compared to Marathon Petroleum's net margin of 5.48%. Mplx's return on equity of 32.83% beat Marathon Petroleum's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Mplx	35.75%	32.83%	10.98%
Marathon Petroleum	5.48%	31.96%	8.88%

24.3% of Mplx shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 76.8% of Marathon Petroleum shares are held by institutional investors. 0.2% of Marathon Petroleum shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Mplx has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Marathon Petroleum. Mplx is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Marathon Petroleum, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Mplx	$13.00B	4.40	$4.91B	$4.65	12.13
Marathon Petroleum	$135.22B	0.91	$4.05B	$29.09	14.50

Summary

Marathon Petroleum beats Mplx on 10 of the 19 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Marathon Petroleum compare to Par Pacific?

Par Pacific (NYSE:PARR) and Marathon Petroleum (NYSE:MPC) are both energy companies, but which is the superior investment? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their risk, dividends, earnings, profitability, valuation, media sentiment, institutional ownership and analyst recommendations.

Par Pacific currently has a consensus target price of $84.29, indicating a potential upside of 0.37%. Marathon Petroleum has a consensus target price of $370.38, indicating a potential downside of 12.22%. Given Par Pacific's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, research analysts plainly believe Par Pacific is more favorable than Marathon Petroleum.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Par Pacific	0 Sell rating(s)	1 Hold rating(s)	11 Buy rating(s)	1 Strong Buy rating(s)	3.00
Marathon Petroleum	0 Sell rating(s)	5 Hold rating(s)	11 Buy rating(s)	1 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.76

In the previous week, Marathon Petroleum had 5 more articles in the media than Par Pacific. MarketBeat recorded 13 mentions for Marathon Petroleum and 8 mentions for Par Pacific. Marathon Petroleum's average media sentiment score of 0.87 beat Par Pacific's score of 0.07 indicating that Marathon Petroleum is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Par Pacific	0 Very Positive mention(s)	1 Positive mention(s)	7 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Neutral
Marathon Petroleum	8 Very Positive mention(s)	1 Positive mention(s)	3 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive

Par Pacific has a net margin of 9.94% compared to Marathon Petroleum's net margin of 5.48%. Par Pacific's return on equity of 56.19% beat Marathon Petroleum's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Par Pacific	9.94%	56.19%	21.61%
Marathon Petroleum	5.48%	31.96%	8.88%

Marathon Petroleum has higher revenue and earnings than Par Pacific. Par Pacific is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Marathon Petroleum, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Par Pacific	$7.46B	0.56	$369.39M	$17.14	4.90
Marathon Petroleum	$135.22B	0.91	$4.05B	$29.09	14.50

Par Pacific has a beta of 0.75, suggesting that its share price is 25% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Marathon Petroleum has a beta of 0.54, suggesting that its share price is 46% less volatile than the broader market.

92.2% of Par Pacific shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 76.8% of Marathon Petroleum shares are owned by institutional investors. 3.6% of Par Pacific shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 0.2% of Marathon Petroleum shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Summary

Par Pacific beats Marathon Petroleum on 8 of the 15 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Marathon Petroleum compare to PBF Energy?

PBF Energy (NYSE:PBF) and Marathon Petroleum (NYSE:MPC) are both energy companies, but which is the better stock? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their dividends, institutional ownership, risk, earnings, profitability, media sentiment, valuation and analyst recommendations.

Marathon Petroleum has a net margin of 5.48% compared to PBF Energy's net margin of 3.94%. Marathon Petroleum's return on equity of 31.96% beat PBF Energy's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
PBF Energy	3.94%	11.27%	4.67%
Marathon Petroleum	5.48%	31.96%	8.88%

96.3% of PBF Energy shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 76.8% of Marathon Petroleum shares are held by institutional investors. 5.5% of PBF Energy shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.2% of Marathon Petroleum shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

PBF Energy currently has a consensus price target of $59.55, indicating a potential downside of 26.14%. Marathon Petroleum has a consensus price target of $370.38, indicating a potential downside of 12.22%. Given Marathon Petroleum's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Marathon Petroleum is more favorable than PBF Energy.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
PBF Energy	3 Sell rating(s)	8 Hold rating(s)	3 Buy rating(s)	1 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.13
Marathon Petroleum	0 Sell rating(s)	5 Hold rating(s)	11 Buy rating(s)	1 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.76

PBF Energy pays an annual dividend of $1.10 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.4%. Marathon Petroleum pays an annual dividend of $4.00 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.9%. PBF Energy pays out 9.7% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Marathon Petroleum pays out 13.8% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. PBF Energy has increased its dividend for 2 consecutive years and Marathon Petroleum has increased its dividend for 3 consecutive years. PBF Energy is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

Marathon Petroleum has higher revenue and earnings than PBF Energy. PBF Energy is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Marathon Petroleum, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
PBF Energy	$29.33B	0.33	-$158.50M	$11.30	7.13
Marathon Petroleum	$135.22B	0.91	$4.05B	$29.09	14.50

In the previous week, Marathon Petroleum had 3 more articles in the media than PBF Energy. MarketBeat recorded 13 mentions for Marathon Petroleum and 10 mentions for PBF Energy. PBF Energy's average media sentiment score of 0.97 beat Marathon Petroleum's score of 0.87 indicating that PBF Energy is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
PBF Energy	5 Very Positive mention(s)	4 Positive mention(s)	1 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive
Marathon Petroleum	8 Very Positive mention(s)	1 Positive mention(s)	3 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive

PBF Energy has a beta of 0.18, suggesting that its stock price is 82% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Marathon Petroleum has a beta of 0.54, suggesting that its stock price is 46% less volatile than the broader market.

Summary

Marathon Petroleum beats PBF Energy on 14 of the 19 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Marathon Petroleum compare to Phillips 66?

Marathon Petroleum (NYSE:MPC) and Phillips 66 (NYSE:PSX) are both large-cap energy companies, but which is the superior business? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their profitability, institutional ownership, earnings, valuation, media sentiment, dividends, analyst recommendations and risk.

Marathon Petroleum has a net margin of 5.48% compared to Phillips 66's net margin of 4.54%. Marathon Petroleum's return on equity of 31.96% beat Phillips 66's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Marathon Petroleum	5.48%	31.96%	8.88%
Phillips 66	4.54%	19.93%	7.62%

76.8% of Marathon Petroleum shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 76.9% of Phillips 66 shares are held by institutional investors. 0.2% of Marathon Petroleum shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.4% of Phillips 66 shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Marathon Petroleum currently has a consensus target price of $370.38, indicating a potential downside of 12.22%. Phillips 66 has a consensus target price of $246.50, indicating a potential downside of 6.79%. Given Phillips 66's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Phillips 66 is more favorable than Marathon Petroleum.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Marathon Petroleum	0 Sell rating(s)	5 Hold rating(s)	11 Buy rating(s)	1 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.76
Phillips 66	0 Sell rating(s)	6 Hold rating(s)	12 Buy rating(s)	2 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.80

Marathon Petroleum pays an annual dividend of $4.00 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.9%. Phillips 66 pays an annual dividend of $5.08 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.9%. Marathon Petroleum pays out 13.8% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Phillips 66 pays out 28.9% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Marathon Petroleum has increased its dividend for 3 consecutive years and Phillips 66 has increased its dividend for 14 consecutive years. Phillips 66 is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

Phillips 66 has higher revenue and earnings than Marathon Petroleum. Marathon Petroleum is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Phillips 66, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Marathon Petroleum	$135.22B	0.91	$4.05B	$29.09	14.50
Phillips 66	$136.56B	0.77	$4.40B	$17.55	15.07

In the previous week, Phillips 66 had 5 more articles in the media than Marathon Petroleum. MarketBeat recorded 18 mentions for Phillips 66 and 13 mentions for Marathon Petroleum. Marathon Petroleum's average media sentiment score of 0.87 beat Phillips 66's score of 0.46 indicating that Marathon Petroleum is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Marathon Petroleum	8 Very Positive mention(s)	1 Positive mention(s)	3 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive
Phillips 66	2 Very Positive mention(s)	7 Positive mention(s)	5 Neutral mention(s)	2 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Neutral

Marathon Petroleum has a beta of 0.54, meaning that its stock price is 46% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Phillips 66 has a beta of 0.71, meaning that its stock price is 29% less volatile than the broader market.

Summary

Phillips 66 beats Marathon Petroleum on 13 of the 20 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Marathon Petroleum News Delivered to You Automatically

Subscribe Now

SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding MPC and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of NYSE and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.

MPC vs. The Competition

Export

Metric	Marathon Petroleum	Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels Industry	Energy Sector	NYSE Exchange
Market Cap	$123.29B	$11.31B	$9.86B	$22.78B
Dividend Yield	0.95%	10.20%	10.66%	3.73%
P/E Ratio	14.50	16.94	20.03	27.75
Price / Sales	0.91	659.35	537.55	21.39
Price / Cash	19.33	40.98	36.98	38.23
Price / Book	5.27	4.44	4.01	4.64
Net Income	$4.05B	$5.28B	$4.35B	$1.08B
7 Day Performance	7.43%	-1.09%	-1.12%	-1.06%
1 Month Performance	8.23%	-3.09%	-3.21%	-5.60%
1 Year Performance	118.26%	28.17%	28.95%	5.09%

Marathon Petroleum Competitors List

Export

Company	MarketRank	Share Price	Analysts' Price Target	1Y Price Performance	Market Cap	Revenue	P/E Ratio	Employee Count	Indicator(s)
MPC Marathon Petroleum	3.8758 of 5 stars	$421.93 +0.4%	$370.38 -12.2%	+118.3%	$123.29B	$135.22B	14.50	18,500	Analyst Forecast
DINO HF Sinclair	2.6952 of 5 stars	$106.85 +0.0%	$94.25 -11.8%	+119.0%	$19.00B	$26.87B	10.20	5,165	Analyst Forecast
MPLX Mplx	4.3322 of 5 stars	$56.97 +0.3%	$63.80 +12.0%	+13.6%	$57.76B	$13.00B	12.25	5,762	News Coverage
PARR Par Pacific	2.2174 of 5 stars	$77.28 -0.2%	$84.29 +9.1%	+144.4%	$3.87B	$7.46B	4.51	1,758
PBF PBF Energy	3.767 of 5 stars	$73.56 -0.2%	$59.55 -19.0%	+164.0%	$8.72B	$29.33B	6.51	3,678	News Coverage Analyst Forecast

Related Companies and Tools

Related Companies

Top 10 Stock Comparisons

This page (NYSE:MPC) was last updated on 10/4/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.

From Our Partners

Unlock superior investment research and tools.

Get MarketBeat All Access

In-depth profiles and analysis for 20,000 public companies.
Real-time analyst ratings, insider transactions, earnings data, and more.
Our daily ratings and market update email newsletter.

Sign In
Create Account

Your Email Address:

Your Password:

Forgot your password?

Your Email Address:

Choose a Password:

By creating a free account, you agree to our terms of service. This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

Marathon Petroleum (MPC) Competitors

MPC vs. DINO, MPLX, PARR, PBF, and PSX

How does Marathon Petroleum compare to HF Sinclair?

Summary

How does Marathon Petroleum compare to Mplx?

Summary

How does Marathon Petroleum compare to Par Pacific?

Summary

How does Marathon Petroleum compare to PBF Energy?

Summary

How does Marathon Petroleum compare to Phillips 66?

Summary

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

Media Sentiment Over Time

MPC vs. The Competition

Marathon Petroleum Competitors List

Related Companies and Tools

Best-in-Class Portfolio Monitoring

Stock Ideas and Recommendations

Advanced Stock Screeners and Research Tools

About MarketBeat

MarketBeat Products

Popular Tools

Financial Calendars

Terms & Info

Marathon Petroleum (MPC) Competitors

MPC vs. DINO, MPLX, PARR, PBF, and PSX

How does Marathon Petroleum compare to HF Sinclair?

Which has more volatility and risk, MPC or DINO?

Is MPC or DINO a better dividend stock?

Does the media prefer MPC or DINO?

Which has preferable earnings and valuation, MPC or DINO?

Is MPC or DINO more profitable?

Do analysts rate MPC or DINO?

Do institutionals and insiders believe in MPC or DINO?

Summary

How does Marathon Petroleum compare to Mplx?

Is MPLX or MPC a better dividend stock?

Do analysts prefer MPLX or MPC?

Which has more risk and volatility, MPLX or MPC?

Does the media prefer MPLX or MPC?

Is MPLX or MPC more profitable?

Do institutionals & insiders have more ownership in MPLX or MPC?

Which has higher earnings and valuation, MPLX or MPC?

Summary

How does Marathon Petroleum compare to Par Pacific?

Do analysts rate PARR or MPC?

Does the media refer more to PARR or MPC?

Is PARR or MPC more profitable?

Which has preferable valuation & earnings, PARR or MPC?

Which has more volatility and risk, PARR or MPC?

Do insiders and institutionals believe in PARR or MPC?

Summary

How does Marathon Petroleum compare to PBF Energy?

Is PBF or MPC more profitable?

Do institutionals and insiders believe in PBF or MPC?

Do analysts rate PBF or MPC?

Is PBF or MPC a better dividend stock?

Which has preferable valuation and earnings, PBF or MPC?

Does the media refer more to PBF or MPC?

Which has more risk and volatility, PBF or MPC?

Summary

How does Marathon Petroleum compare to Phillips 66?

Is MPC or PSX more profitable?

Do institutionals & insiders hold more shares of MPC or PSX?

Do analysts rate MPC or PSX?

Is MPC or PSX a better dividend stock?

Which has preferable earnings & valuation, MPC or PSX?

Does the media prefer MPC or PSX?

Which has more volatility and risk, MPC or PSX?

Summary

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

Media Sentiment Over Time

MPC vs. The Competition

Marathon Petroleum Competitors List

Related Companies and Tools

MarketBeat All Access Features

Best-in-Class Portfolio Monitoring

Stock Ideas and Recommendations

Advanced Stock Screeners and Research Tools