S&P 500   3,768.47
DOW   30,924.14
QQQ   304.10
S&P 500   3,768.47
DOW   30,924.14
QQQ   304.10
S&P 500   3,768.47
DOW   30,924.14
QQQ   304.10
S&P 500   3,768.47
DOW   30,924.14
QQQ   304.10
Log in
NYSE:RNGR

Ranger Energy Services Competitors

$5.75
-0.17 (-2.87 %)
(As of 03/4/2021 12:00 AM ET)
Add
Compare
Today's Range
$5.75
Now: $5.75
$6.15
50-Day Range
$4.40
MA: $5.06
$5.92
52-Week Range
$2.27
Now: $5.75
$7.00
Volume8,474 shs
Average Volume17,557 shs
Market Capitalization$88.52 million
P/E RatioN/A
Dividend YieldN/A
Beta2.22

Competitors

Ranger Energy Services (NYSE:RNGR) Vs. SLB, HAL, CLB, RES, LBRT, and OII

Should you be buying RNGR stock or one of its competitors? Companies in the industry of "oil & gas field services, not elsewhere classified" are considered alternatives and competitors to Ranger Energy Services, including Schlumberger (SLB), Halliburton (HAL), Core Laboratories (CLB), RPC (RES), Liberty Oilfield Services (LBRT), and Oceaneering International (OII).

Schlumberger (NYSE:SLB) and Ranger Energy Services (NYSE:RNGR) are both oils/energy companies, but which is the better business? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their institutional ownership, risk, earnings, profitability, analyst recommendations, dividends and valuation.

Volatility & Risk

Schlumberger has a beta of 2.28, indicating that its share price is 128% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Ranger Energy Services has a beta of 2.22, indicating that its share price is 122% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Earnings and Valuation

This table compares Schlumberger and Ranger Energy Services' top-line revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

Gross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Schlumberger$32.92 billion1.21$-10,137,000,000.00$1.4719.44
Ranger Energy Services$336.90 million0.26$1.80 million$0.2523.00

Ranger Energy Services has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Schlumberger. Schlumberger is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Ranger Energy Services, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Profitability

This table compares Schlumberger and Ranger Energy Services' net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Net MarginsReturn on EquityReturn on Assets
Schlumberger-40.15%7.34%2.46%
Ranger Energy Services-2.96%-3.85%-2.82%

Insider and Institutional Ownership

73.2% of Schlumberger shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 23.5% of Ranger Energy Services shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.6% of Schlumberger shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 5.7% of Ranger Energy Services shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a summary of recent ratings for Schlumberger and Ranger Energy Services, as provided by MarketBeat.com.

Sell RatingsHold RatingsBuy RatingsStrong Buy RatingsRating Score
Schlumberger361702.54
Ranger Energy Services02202.50

Schlumberger presently has a consensus target price of $23.6458, suggesting a potential downside of 17.26%. Ranger Energy Services has a consensus target price of $6.1667, suggesting a potential upside of 7.25%. Given Ranger Energy Services' higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Ranger Energy Services is more favorable than Schlumberger.

Summary

Schlumberger beats Ranger Energy Services on 10 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

Halliburton (NYSE:HAL) and Ranger Energy Services (NYSE:RNGR) are both oils/energy companies, but which is the superior business? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, risk, earnings, dividends, institutional ownership, valuation and profitability.

Profitability

This table compares Halliburton and Ranger Energy Services' net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Net MarginsReturn on EquityReturn on Assets
Halliburton-26.60%11.10%3.08%
Ranger Energy Services-2.96%-3.85%-2.82%

Volatility & Risk

Halliburton has a beta of 2.81, suggesting that its stock price is 181% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Ranger Energy Services has a beta of 2.22, suggesting that its stock price is 122% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Earnings and Valuation

This table compares Halliburton and Ranger Energy Services' gross revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

Gross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Halliburton$22.41 billion0.88$-1,131,000,000.00$1.2417.81
Ranger Energy Services$336.90 million0.26$1.80 million$0.2523.00

Ranger Energy Services has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Halliburton. Halliburton is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Ranger Energy Services, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Institutional & Insider Ownership

75.4% of Halliburton shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 23.5% of Ranger Energy Services shares are held by institutional investors. 0.5% of Halliburton shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 5.7% of Ranger Energy Services shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Analyst Ratings

This is a summary of recent recommendations for Halliburton and Ranger Energy Services, as provided by MarketBeat.com.

Sell RatingsHold RatingsBuy RatingsStrong Buy RatingsRating Score
Halliburton3111022.42
Ranger Energy Services02202.50

Halliburton presently has a consensus target price of $16.8190, suggesting a potential downside of 23.83%. Ranger Energy Services has a consensus target price of $6.1667, suggesting a potential upside of 7.25%. Given Ranger Energy Services' stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Ranger Energy Services is more favorable than Halliburton.

Summary

Halliburton beats Ranger Energy Services on 10 of the 15 factors compared between the two stocks.

Ranger Energy Services (NYSE:RNGR) and Core Laboratories (NYSE:CLB) are both small-cap oils/energy companies, but which is the superior investment? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their dividends, profitability, analyst recommendations, institutional ownership, earnings, valuation and risk.

Institutional and Insider Ownership

23.5% of Ranger Energy Services shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 92.7% of Core Laboratories shares are held by institutional investors. 5.7% of Ranger Energy Services shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 1.1% of Core Laboratories shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Valuation & Earnings

This table compares Ranger Energy Services and Core Laboratories' revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

Gross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Ranger Energy Services$336.90 million0.26$1.80 million$0.2523.00
Core Laboratories$668.21 million2.33$101.98 million$1.7919.51

Core Laboratories has higher revenue and earnings than Ranger Energy Services. Core Laboratories is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Ranger Energy Services, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Profitability

This table compares Ranger Energy Services and Core Laboratories' net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Net MarginsReturn on EquityReturn on Assets
Ranger Energy Services-2.96%-3.85%-2.82%
Core Laboratories-19.02%45.39%6.74%

Volatility & Risk

Ranger Energy Services has a beta of 2.22, meaning that its share price is 122% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Core Laboratories has a beta of 3.38, meaning that its share price is 238% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Analyst Ratings

This is a breakdown of recent ratings and price targets for Ranger Energy Services and Core Laboratories, as provided by MarketBeat.com.

Sell RatingsHold RatingsBuy RatingsStrong Buy RatingsRating Score
Ranger Energy Services02202.50
Core Laboratories19202.08

Ranger Energy Services presently has a consensus target price of $6.1667, indicating a potential upside of 7.25%. Core Laboratories has a consensus target price of $21.2222, indicating a potential downside of 39.24%. Given Ranger Energy Services' stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, equities analysts plainly believe Ranger Energy Services is more favorable than Core Laboratories.

Summary

Core Laboratories beats Ranger Energy Services on 8 of the 13 factors compared between the two stocks.

RPC (NYSE:RES) and Ranger Energy Services (NYSE:RNGR) are both small-cap oils/energy companies, but which is the better business? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, profitability, institutional ownership, risk, dividends, valuation and earnings.

Risk and Volatility

RPC has a beta of 2.13, meaning that its share price is 113% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Ranger Energy Services has a beta of 2.22, meaning that its share price is 122% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Profitability

This table compares RPC and Ranger Energy Services' net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Net MarginsReturn on EquityReturn on Assets
RPC-32.86%-9.35%-7.44%
Ranger Energy Services-2.96%-3.85%-2.82%

Institutional and Insider Ownership

25.7% of RPC shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 23.5% of Ranger Energy Services shares are owned by institutional investors. 73.6% of RPC shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 5.7% of Ranger Energy Services shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Earnings and Valuation

This table compares RPC and Ranger Energy Services' top-line revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

Gross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
RPC$1.22 billion1.16$-87,110,000.00($0.12)-54.58
Ranger Energy Services$336.90 million0.26$1.80 million$0.2523.00

Ranger Energy Services has lower revenue, but higher earnings than RPC. RPC is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Ranger Energy Services, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Analyst Ratings

This is a summary of recent ratings and recommmendations for RPC and Ranger Energy Services, as provided by MarketBeat.

Sell RatingsHold RatingsBuy RatingsStrong Buy RatingsRating Score
RPC23101.83
Ranger Energy Services02202.50

RPC currently has a consensus price target of $3.1786, indicating a potential downside of 51.47%. Ranger Energy Services has a consensus price target of $6.1667, indicating a potential upside of 7.25%. Given Ranger Energy Services' stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Ranger Energy Services is more favorable than RPC.

Summary

Ranger Energy Services beats RPC on 9 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

Liberty Oilfield Services (NYSE:LBRT) and Ranger Energy Services (NYSE:RNGR) are both small-cap oils/energy companies, but which is the superior business? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their risk, institutional ownership, earnings, profitability, dividends, valuation and analyst recommendations.

Institutional & Insider Ownership

23.5% of Ranger Energy Services shares are held by institutional investors. 8.5% of Liberty Oilfield Services shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 5.7% of Ranger Energy Services shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Risk & Volatility

Liberty Oilfield Services has a beta of 3.31, meaning that its stock price is 231% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Ranger Energy Services has a beta of 2.22, meaning that its stock price is 122% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Analyst Ratings

This is a summary of current recommendations and price targets for Liberty Oilfield Services and Ranger Energy Services, as reported by MarketBeat.com.

Sell RatingsHold RatingsBuy RatingsStrong Buy RatingsRating Score
Liberty Oilfield Services25502.25
Ranger Energy Services02202.50

Liberty Oilfield Services presently has a consensus target price of $10.75, suggesting a potential downside of 13.45%. Ranger Energy Services has a consensus target price of $6.1667, suggesting a potential upside of 7.25%. Given Ranger Energy Services' stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Ranger Energy Services is more favorable than Liberty Oilfield Services.

Profitability

This table compares Liberty Oilfield Services and Ranger Energy Services' net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Net MarginsReturn on EquityReturn on Assets
Liberty Oilfield Services-8.20%-11.01%-6.95%
Ranger Energy Services-2.96%-3.85%-2.82%

Earnings and Valuation

This table compares Liberty Oilfield Services and Ranger Energy Services' top-line revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

Gross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Liberty Oilfield Services$1.99 billion0.70$39 million$0.5323.43
Ranger Energy Services$336.90 million0.26$1.80 million$0.2523.00

Liberty Oilfield Services has higher revenue and earnings than Ranger Energy Services. Ranger Energy Services is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Liberty Oilfield Services, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Ranger Energy Services (NYSE:RNGR) and Oceaneering International (NYSE:OII) are both small-cap oils/energy companies, but which is the superior business? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, institutional ownership, risk, earnings, profitability, valuation and dividends.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a breakdown of recent ratings and price targets for Ranger Energy Services and Oceaneering International, as provided by MarketBeat.com.

Sell RatingsHold RatingsBuy RatingsStrong Buy RatingsRating Score
Ranger Energy Services02202.50
Oceaneering International09202.18

Ranger Energy Services presently has a consensus price target of $6.1667, suggesting a potential upside of 7.25%. Oceaneering International has a consensus price target of $8.9750, suggesting a potential downside of 28.37%. Given Ranger Energy Services' stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, equities analysts clearly believe Ranger Energy Services is more favorable than Oceaneering International.

Volatility & Risk

Ranger Energy Services has a beta of 2.22, suggesting that its share price is 122% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Oceaneering International has a beta of 3.6, suggesting that its share price is 260% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Profitability

This table compares Ranger Energy Services and Oceaneering International's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Net MarginsReturn on EquityReturn on Assets
Ranger Energy Services-2.96%-3.85%-2.82%
Oceaneering International-37.40%-3.56%-1.14%

Valuation & Earnings

This table compares Ranger Energy Services and Oceaneering International's gross revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

Gross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Ranger Energy Services$336.90 million0.26$1.80 million$0.2523.00
Oceaneering International$2.05 billion0.61$-348,440,000.00($0.82)-15.28

Ranger Energy Services has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Oceaneering International. Oceaneering International is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Ranger Energy Services, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Insider & Institutional Ownership

23.5% of Ranger Energy Services shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 83.4% of Oceaneering International shares are held by institutional investors. 5.7% of Ranger Energy Services shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 1.8% of Oceaneering International shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Summary

Oceaneering International beats Ranger Energy Services on 7 of the 13 factors compared between the two stocks.


Ranger Energy Services Competitors List

Competitor NameCompetitor BTM RankCompetitor PriceCompetitor Price ChangeCompetitor Market CapCompetitor RevenueCompetitor P/E RatioCompetitor Indicator(s)
Schlumberger logo
SLB
Schlumberger
2.3$28.58-0.7%$39.96 billion$32.92 billion-3.76Analyst Report
Halliburton logo
HAL
Halliburton
2.2$22.08-0.9%$19.62 billion$22.41 billion-4.44Ex-Dividend
Core Laboratories logo
CLB
Core Laboratories
1.5$34.93-1.1%$1.56 billion$668.21 million-15.39News Coverage
RPC logo
RES
RPC
1.2$6.55-1.1%$1.41 billion$1.22 billion-6.12
Liberty Oilfield Services logo
LBRT
Liberty Oilfield Services
1.1$12.42-1.2%$1.40 billion$1.99 billion-11.39Insider Selling
Decrease in Short Interest
Oceaneering International logo
OII
Oceaneering International
1.0$12.53-1.1%$1.24 billion$2.05 billion-1.69Analyst Report
ProPetro logo
PUMP
ProPetro
1.3$11.93-3.1%$1.20 billion$2.05 billion-29.10Analyst Report
NESR
National Energy Services Reunited
1.6$12.89-2.5%$1.12 billion$658.39 million30.69
Frank's International logo
FI
Frank's International
0.8$4.88-1.4%$1.11 billion$579.92 million-3.49Analyst Downgrade
NexTier Oilfield Solutions logo
NEX
NexTier Oilfield Solutions
1.3$4.84-0.6%$1.04 billion$1.82 billion-2.66
Helix Energy Solutions Group logo
HLX
Helix Energy Solutions Group
1.2$5.33-5.1%$803.31 million$751.91 million33.31
Select Energy Services logo
WTTR
Select Energy Services
1.0$6.31-0.0%$650.21 million$1.29 billion-1.84
North American Construction Group logo
NOA
North American Construction Group
2.6$12.06-0.2%$369.45 million$541.89 million10.22
Mammoth Energy Services logo
TUSK
Mammoth Energy Services
0.9$5.72-5.4%$261.80 million$625.01 million-1.65
Natural Gas Services Group logo
NGS
Natural Gas Services Group
1.6$10.09-3.0%$135.90 million$78.44 million72.07Increase in Short Interest
KLXE
KLX Energy Services
1.3$13.12-6.6%$111.65 million$544 million-0.20Upcoming Earnings
Decrease in Short Interest
U.S. Well Services logo
USWS
U.S. Well Services
1.0$1.48-12.2%$109.62 million$514.76 million-0.34Decrease in Short Interest
Nine Energy Service logo
NINE
Nine Energy Service
0.6$3.37-0.0%$106.36 million$832.94 million-0.18Upcoming Earnings
Decrease in Short Interest
CSI Compressco logo
CCLP
CSI Compressco
0.6$1.92-0.5%$90.92 million$476.58 million-1.78Gap Down
NCS Multistage logo
NCSM
NCS Multistage
0.8$33.34-12.1%$78.68 million$205.49 million-1.14Earnings Announcement
Gap Up
RCON
Recon Technology
0.6$2.20-4.5%$39.43 million$9.30 million0.00Gap Down
This page was last updated on 3/5/2021 by MarketBeat.com Staff

Enter your email address below to receive a concise daily summary of analysts' upgrades, downgrades and new coverage with MarketBeat.com's FREE daily email newsletter.