Which has better valuation & earnings, RES or RNGR?

RPC has higher revenue and earnings than Ranger Energy Services. Ranger Energy Services is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than RPC, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks. Company Gross Revenue Price/Sales Ratio Net Income Earnings Per Share Price/Earnings Ratio RPC $1.63B 0.80 $32.08M $0.09 64.89 Ranger Energy Services $546.90M 0.67 $12.30M $0.60 26.14

Do analysts recommend FET or RNGR?

Ranger Energy Services has a consensus price target of $20.00, indicating a potential upside of 27.53%. Given Ranger Energy Services' higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Ranger Energy Services is more favorable than Forum Energy Technologies. Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score Forum Energy Technologies 1 Sell rating(s) 0 Hold rating(s) 0 Buy rating(s) 1 Strong Buy rating(s) 2.50 Ranger Energy Services 0 Sell rating(s) 2 Hold rating(s) 1 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 2.33

Ranger Energy Services (RNGR) Competitors

$15.68 +0.27 (+1.77%)

Closing price 10/2/2026 03:59 PM Eastern

Extended Trading

$15.66 -0.02 (-0.11%)

As of 10/2/2026 07:30 PM Eastern

Compare

RNGR vs. RES, VTOL, PUMP, FET, and TTI

Should you buy Ranger Energy Services stock or one of its competitors? Ranger Energy Services's main competitors and comparable companies include RPC (RES), Bristow Group (VTOL), ProPetro (PUMP), Forum Energy Technologies (FET), and Tetra Technologies (TTI). Companies are selected based on similarities in market, industry, and size. These companies are all part of the "oil & gas equipment & services" industry.

How does Ranger Energy Services compare to RPC?

RPC (NYSE:RES) and Ranger Energy Services (NYSE:RNGR) are both small-cap energy companies, but which is the superior stock? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their dividends, risk, institutional ownership, media sentiment, earnings, analyst recommendations, valuation and profitability.

41.1% of RPC shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 68.1% of Ranger Energy Services shares are owned by institutional investors. 58.8% of RPC shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 2.8% of Ranger Energy Services shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

In the previous week, RPC had 1 more articles in the media than Ranger Energy Services. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for RPC and 0 mentions for Ranger Energy Services. RPC's average media sentiment score of 1.79 beat Ranger Energy Services' score of 0.00 indicating that RPC is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company	Overall Sentiment
RPC	Very Positive
Ranger Energy Services	Neutral

RPC currently has a consensus price target of $6.00, indicating a potential upside of 2.74%. Ranger Energy Services has a consensus price target of $20.00, indicating a potential upside of 27.53%. Given Ranger Energy Services' stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Ranger Energy Services is more favorable than RPC.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
RPC	1 Sell rating(s)	3 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	1.75
Ranger Energy Services	0 Sell rating(s)	2 Hold rating(s)	1 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.33

RPC pays an annual dividend of $0.16 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.7%. Ranger Energy Services pays an annual dividend of $0.24 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.5%. RPC pays out 177.8% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Ranger Energy Services pays out 40.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Ranger Energy Services has raised its dividend for 2 consecutive years.

RPC has a beta of 0.86, suggesting that its share price is 14% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Ranger Energy Services has a beta of 0.27, suggesting that its share price is 73% less volatile than the broader market.

RPC has higher revenue and earnings than Ranger Energy Services. Ranger Energy Services is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than RPC, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
RPC	$1.63B	0.80	$32.08M	$0.09	64.89
Ranger Energy Services	$546.90M	0.67	$12.30M	$0.60	26.14

Ranger Energy Services has a net margin of 2.36% compared to RPC's net margin of 1.28%. Ranger Energy Services' return on equity of 4.87% beat RPC's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
RPC	1.28%	4.82%	3.60%
Ranger Energy Services	2.36%	4.87%	3.33%

Summary

RPC beats Ranger Energy Services on 10 of the 19 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Ranger Energy Services compare to Bristow Group?

Ranger Energy Services (NYSE:RNGR) and Bristow Group (NYSE:VTOL) are both small-cap energy companies, but which is the superior investment? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their dividends, analyst recommendations, risk, earnings, profitability, institutional ownership, media sentiment and valuation.

68.1% of Ranger Energy Services shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 93.3% of Bristow Group shares are held by institutional investors. 2.8% of Ranger Energy Services shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 12.8% of Bristow Group shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Bristow Group has a net margin of 6.66% compared to Ranger Energy Services' net margin of 2.36%. Bristow Group's return on equity of 9.82% beat Ranger Energy Services' return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Ranger Energy Services	2.36%	4.87%	3.33%
Bristow Group	6.66%	9.82%	4.45%

Ranger Energy Services has a beta of 0.27, indicating that its share price is 73% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Bristow Group has a beta of 1.23, indicating that its share price is 23% more volatile than the broader market.

Ranger Energy Services pays an annual dividend of $0.24 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.5%. Bristow Group pays an annual dividend of $0.50 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.2%. Ranger Energy Services pays out 40.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Bristow Group pays out 14.4% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Ranger Energy Services has raised its dividend for 2 consecutive years. Ranger Energy Services is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

Ranger Energy Services presently has a consensus price target of $20.00, indicating a potential upside of 27.53%. Bristow Group has a consensus price target of $60.00, indicating a potential upside of 49.31%. Given Bristow Group's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Bristow Group is more favorable than Ranger Energy Services.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Ranger Energy Services	0 Sell rating(s)	2 Hold rating(s)	1 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.33
Bristow Group	0 Sell rating(s)	1 Hold rating(s)	3 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.75

Bristow Group has higher revenue and earnings than Ranger Energy Services. Bristow Group is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Ranger Energy Services, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Ranger Energy Services	$546.90M	0.67	$12.30M	$0.60	26.14
Bristow Group	$1.49B	0.80	$129.07M	$3.47	11.58

In the previous week, Bristow Group had 2 more articles in the media than Ranger Energy Services. MarketBeat recorded 2 mentions for Bristow Group and 0 mentions for Ranger Energy Services. Bristow Group's average media sentiment score of 0.76 beat Ranger Energy Services' score of 0.00 indicating that Bristow Group is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company	Overall Sentiment
Ranger Energy Services	Neutral
Bristow Group	Positive

Summary

Bristow Group beats Ranger Energy Services on 16 of the 19 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Ranger Energy Services compare to ProPetro?

Ranger Energy Services (NYSE:RNGR) and ProPetro (NYSE:PUMP) are both small-cap energy companies, but which is the superior business? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their valuation, analyst recommendations, risk, media sentiment, profitability, earnings, institutional ownership and dividends.

In the previous week, ProPetro had 9 more articles in the media than Ranger Energy Services. MarketBeat recorded 9 mentions for ProPetro and 0 mentions for Ranger Energy Services. ProPetro's average media sentiment score of 0.76 beat Ranger Energy Services' score of 0.00 indicating that ProPetro is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company	Overall Sentiment
Ranger Energy Services	Neutral
ProPetro	Positive

Ranger Energy Services presently has a consensus target price of $20.00, indicating a potential upside of 27.53%. ProPetro has a consensus target price of $15.25, indicating a potential upside of 64.88%. Given ProPetro's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe ProPetro is more favorable than Ranger Energy Services.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Ranger Energy Services	0 Sell rating(s)	2 Hold rating(s)	1 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.33
ProPetro	1 Sell rating(s)	4 Hold rating(s)	8 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.54

Ranger Energy Services has a net margin of 2.36% compared to ProPetro's net margin of -1.15%. Ranger Energy Services' return on equity of 4.87% beat ProPetro's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Ranger Energy Services	2.36%	4.87%	3.33%
ProPetro	-1.15%	-1.49%	-0.89%

Ranger Energy Services has a beta of 0.27, suggesting that its share price is 73% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, ProPetro has a beta of 0.86, suggesting that its share price is 14% less volatile than the broader market.

Ranger Energy Services has higher earnings, but lower revenue than ProPetro. ProPetro is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Ranger Energy Services, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Ranger Energy Services	$546.90M	0.67	$12.30M	$0.60	26.14
ProPetro	$1.27B	0.90	$820K	-$0.11	N/A

68.1% of Ranger Energy Services shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 84.7% of ProPetro shares are owned by institutional investors. 2.8% of Ranger Energy Services shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 1.6% of ProPetro shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Summary

ProPetro beats Ranger Energy Services on 9 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Ranger Energy Services compare to Forum Energy Technologies?

Forum Energy Technologies (NYSE:FET) and Ranger Energy Services (NYSE:RNGR) are both small-cap energy companies, but which is the better stock? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their profitability, dividends, earnings, media sentiment, valuation, risk, analyst recommendations and institutional ownership.

Ranger Energy Services has a net margin of 2.36% compared to Forum Energy Technologies' net margin of -0.19%. Forum Energy Technologies' return on equity of 9.45% beat Ranger Energy Services' return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Forum Energy Technologies	-0.19%	9.45%	3.58%
Ranger Energy Services	2.36%	4.87%	3.33%

Ranger Energy Services has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Forum Energy Technologies. Forum Energy Technologies is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Ranger Energy Services, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Forum Energy Technologies	$833.35M	1.12	-$9.66M	-$0.15	N/A
Ranger Energy Services	$546.90M	0.67	$12.30M	$0.60	26.14

Ranger Energy Services has a consensus price target of $20.00, indicating a potential upside of 27.53%. Given Ranger Energy Services' higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Ranger Energy Services is more favorable than Forum Energy Technologies.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Forum Energy Technologies	1 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	1 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.50
Ranger Energy Services	0 Sell rating(s)	2 Hold rating(s)	1 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.33

In the previous week, Forum Energy Technologies had 2 more articles in the media than Ranger Energy Services. MarketBeat recorded 2 mentions for Forum Energy Technologies and 0 mentions for Ranger Energy Services. Forum Energy Technologies' average media sentiment score of 1.75 beat Ranger Energy Services' score of 0.00 indicating that Forum Energy Technologies is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company	Overall Sentiment
Forum Energy Technologies	Very Positive
Ranger Energy Services	Neutral

Forum Energy Technologies has a beta of 0.68, suggesting that its stock price is 32% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Ranger Energy Services has a beta of 0.27, suggesting that its stock price is 73% less volatile than the broader market.

65.6% of Forum Energy Technologies shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 68.1% of Ranger Energy Services shares are held by institutional investors. 7.7% of Forum Energy Technologies shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 2.8% of Ranger Energy Services shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Summary

Forum Energy Technologies beats Ranger Energy Services on 10 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Ranger Energy Services compare to Tetra Technologies?

Tetra Technologies (NYSE:TTI) and Ranger Energy Services (NYSE:RNGR) are both small-cap energy companies, but which is the better stock? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, earnings, dividends, valuation, risk, media sentiment, profitability and institutional ownership.

70.2% of Tetra Technologies shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 68.1% of Ranger Energy Services shares are owned by institutional investors. 6.3% of Tetra Technologies shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 2.8% of Ranger Energy Services shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

In the previous week, Tetra Technologies had 3 more articles in the media than Ranger Energy Services. MarketBeat recorded 3 mentions for Tetra Technologies and 0 mentions for Ranger Energy Services. Ranger Energy Services' average media sentiment score of 0.00 beat Tetra Technologies' score of -0.13 indicating that Ranger Energy Services is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company	Overall Sentiment
Tetra Technologies	Neutral
Ranger Energy Services	Neutral

Ranger Energy Services has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Tetra Technologies. Ranger Energy Services is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Tetra Technologies, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Tetra Technologies	$630.93M	1.41	$3.01M	$0.04	150.13
Ranger Energy Services	$546.90M	0.67	$12.30M	$0.60	26.14

Tetra Technologies presently has a consensus target price of $11.17, indicating a potential upside of 85.96%. Ranger Energy Services has a consensus target price of $20.00, indicating a potential upside of 27.53%. Given Tetra Technologies' stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, equities research analysts plainly believe Tetra Technologies is more favorable than Ranger Energy Services.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Tetra Technologies	0 Sell rating(s)	2 Hold rating(s)	3 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.60
Ranger Energy Services	0 Sell rating(s)	2 Hold rating(s)	1 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.33

Ranger Energy Services has a net margin of 2.36% compared to Tetra Technologies' net margin of 0.97%. Tetra Technologies' return on equity of 9.11% beat Ranger Energy Services' return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Tetra Technologies	0.97%	9.11%	4.14%
Ranger Energy Services	2.36%	4.87%	3.33%

Tetra Technologies has a beta of 1.26, meaning that its share price is 26% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Ranger Energy Services has a beta of 0.27, meaning that its share price is 73% less volatile than the broader market.

Summary

Tetra Technologies beats Ranger Energy Services on 12 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Ranger Energy Services News Delivered to You Automatically

Subscribe Now

SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding RNGR and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of NYSE and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.

RNGR vs. The Competition

Export

Metric	Ranger Energy Services	Energy Equipment & Services Industry	Energy Sector	NYSE Exchange
Market Cap	$366.48M	$3.46B	$9.86B	$22.78B
Dividend Yield	1.53%	13.43%	10.66%	3.73%
P/E Ratio	26.14	42.03	20.03	27.75
Price / Sales	0.67	24.92	537.55	21.39
Price / Cash	6.25	20.34	36.98	38.23
Price / Book	1.23	2.09	4.01	4.64
Net Income	$12.30M	$67.81M	$4.35B	$1.08B
7 Day Performance	0.82%	-1.33%	-1.12%	-1.06%
1 Month Performance	-6.59%	-4.35%	-3.21%	-5.60%
1 Year Performance	12.52%	34.21%	28.95%	5.09%

Ranger Energy Services Competitors List

Export

Company	MarketRank	Share Price	Analysts' Price Target	1Y Price Performance	Market Cap	Revenue	P/E Ratio	Employee Count	Indicator(s)
RNGR Ranger Energy Services	4.3302 of 5 stars	$15.68 +1.8%	$20.00 +27.5%	+12.5%	$366.48M	$546.90M	26.14	2,300
RES RPC	1.3869 of 5 stars	$5.62 -1.8%	$6.00 +6.7%	+21.9%	$1.27B	$1.63B	62.49	2,893	Positive News
VTOL Bristow Group	4.7877 of 5 stars	$41.01 -2.7%	$60.00 +46.3%	+9.5%	$1.25B	$1.49B	11.82	3,660
PUMP ProPetro	3.2489 of 5 stars	$8.87 -4.6%	$15.40 +73.6%	+68.0%	$1.14B	$1.27B	N/A	1,700	Analyst Forecast Analyst Revision
FET Forum Energy Technologies	2.0028 of 5 stars	$80.20 -3.4%	N/A	+221.7%	$933.33M	$791.47M	N/A	1,700	Positive News

Related Companies and Tools

Related Companies

Top 10 Stock Comparisons

This page (NYSE:RNGR) was last updated on 10/4/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.

From Our Partners

Unlock superior investment research and tools.

Get MarketBeat All Access

In-depth profiles and analysis for 20,000 public companies.
Real-time analyst ratings, insider transactions, earnings data, and more.
Our daily ratings and market update email newsletter.

Sign In
Create Account

Your Email Address:

Your Password:

Forgot your password?

Your Email Address:

Choose a Password:

By creating a free account, you agree to our terms of service. This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

Ranger Energy Services (RNGR) Competitors

RNGR vs. RES, VTOL, PUMP, FET, and TTI

How does Ranger Energy Services compare to RPC?

Summary

How does Ranger Energy Services compare to Bristow Group?

Summary

How does Ranger Energy Services compare to ProPetro?

Summary

How does Ranger Energy Services compare to Forum Energy Technologies?

Summary

How does Ranger Energy Services compare to Tetra Technologies?

Summary

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

Media Sentiment Over Time

RNGR vs. The Competition

Ranger Energy Services Competitors List

Related Companies and Tools

Best-in-Class Portfolio Monitoring

Stock Ideas and Recommendations

Advanced Stock Screeners and Research Tools

About MarketBeat

MarketBeat Products

Popular Tools

Financial Calendars

Terms & Info

Ranger Energy Services (RNGR) Competitors

RNGR vs. RES, VTOL, PUMP, FET, and TTI

How does Ranger Energy Services compare to RPC?

Do institutionals and insiders hold more shares of RES or RNGR?

Does the media favor RES or RNGR?

Do analysts recommend RES or RNGR?

Is RES or RNGR a better dividend stock?

Which has more volatility and risk, RES or RNGR?

Which has better valuation & earnings, RES or RNGR?

Is RES or RNGR more profitable?

Summary

How does Ranger Energy Services compare to Bristow Group?

Do institutionals and insiders believe in RNGR or VTOL?

Is RNGR or VTOL more profitable?

Which has more volatility & risk, RNGR or VTOL?

Is RNGR or VTOL a better dividend stock?

Do analysts prefer RNGR or VTOL?

Which has stronger valuation & earnings, RNGR or VTOL?

Does the media refer more to RNGR or VTOL?

Summary

How does Ranger Energy Services compare to ProPetro?

Does the media prefer RNGR or PUMP?

Do analysts prefer RNGR or PUMP?

Is RNGR or PUMP more profitable?

Which has more risk and volatility, RNGR or PUMP?

Which has stronger valuation and earnings, RNGR or PUMP?

Do institutionals & insiders believe in RNGR or PUMP?

Summary

How does Ranger Energy Services compare to Forum Energy Technologies?

Is FET or RNGR more profitable?

Which has better valuation & earnings, FET or RNGR?

Do analysts recommend FET or RNGR?

Does the media favor FET or RNGR?

Which has more risk & volatility, FET or RNGR?

Do institutionals & insiders believe in FET or RNGR?

Summary

How does Ranger Energy Services compare to Tetra Technologies?

Do institutionals & insiders believe in TTI or RNGR?

Does the media prefer TTI or RNGR?

Which has better earnings and valuation, TTI or RNGR?

Do analysts recommend TTI or RNGR?

Is TTI or RNGR more profitable?

Which has more volatility and risk, TTI or RNGR?

Summary

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

Media Sentiment Over Time

RNGR vs. The Competition

Ranger Energy Services Competitors List

Related Companies and Tools

MarketBeat All Access Features

Best-in-Class Portfolio Monitoring

Stock Ideas and Recommendations

Advanced Stock Screeners and Research Tools