Vitesse Energy (VTS) Competitors

In the previous week, Diamondback Energy had 16 more articles in the media than Vitesse Energy. MarketBeat recorded 20 mentions for Diamondback Energy and 4 mentions for Vitesse Energy. Diamondback Energy's average media sentiment score of 0.89 beat Vitesse Energy's score of 0.82 indicating that Diamondback Energy is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Diamondback Energy has a beta of 0.43, meaning that its share price is 57% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Vitesse Energy has a beta of 0.6, meaning that its share price is 40% less volatile than the broader market.

Diamondback Energy has higher revenue and earnings than Vitesse Energy. Vitesse Energy is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Diamondback Energy, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

90.0% of Diamondback Energy shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 51.6% of Vitesse Energy shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.6% of Diamondback Energy shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 13.9% of Vitesse Energy shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Diamondback Energy currently has a consensus target price of $226.33, suggesting a potential upside of 21.25%. Vitesse Energy has a consensus target price of $20.25, suggesting a potential upside of 20.71%. Given Diamondback Energy's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Diamondback Energy is more favorable than Vitesse Energy.

Diamondback Energy has a net margin of 8.58% compared to Vitesse Energy's net margin of -3.95%. Diamondback Energy's return on equity of 10.10% beat Vitesse Energy's return on equity.

Diamondback Energy pays an annual dividend of $4.40 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.4%. Vitesse Energy pays an annual dividend of $1.75 per share and has a dividend yield of 10.4%. Diamondback Energy pays out 85.8% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Vitesse Energy pays out -530.3% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Diamondback Energy has raised its dividend for 7 consecutive years and Vitesse Energy has raised its dividend for 2 consecutive years. Vitesse Energy is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

Crescent Energy has higher revenue and earnings than Vitesse Energy. Crescent Energy is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Vitesse Energy, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Vitesse Energy pays an annual dividend of $1.75 per share and has a dividend yield of 10.4%. Crescent Energy pays an annual dividend of $0.48 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.6%. Vitesse Energy pays out -530.3% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Crescent Energy pays out -960.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Vitesse Energy has increased its dividend for 2 consecutive years and Crescent Energy has increased its dividend for 1 consecutive years. Vitesse Energy is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

Vitesse Energy currently has a consensus target price of $20.25, indicating a potential upside of 20.71%. Crescent Energy has a consensus target price of $17.08, indicating a potential upside of 29.81%. Given Crescent Energy's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Crescent Energy is more favorable than Vitesse Energy.

Vitesse Energy has a beta of 0.6, suggesting that its stock price is 40% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Crescent Energy has a beta of 1.45, suggesting that its stock price is 45% more volatile than the broader market.

51.6% of Vitesse Energy shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 52.1% of Crescent Energy shares are owned by institutional investors. 13.9% of Vitesse Energy shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 13.2% of Crescent Energy shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Crescent Energy has a net margin of 1.27% compared to Vitesse Energy's net margin of -3.95%. Crescent Energy's return on equity of 10.52% beat Vitesse Energy's return on equity.

In the previous week, Crescent Energy had 3 more articles in the media than Vitesse Energy. MarketBeat recorded 7 mentions for Crescent Energy and 4 mentions for Vitesse Energy. Crescent Energy's average media sentiment score of 0.99 beat Vitesse Energy's score of 0.82 indicating that Crescent Energy is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

In the previous week, Devon Energy had 11 more articles in the media than Vitesse Energy. MarketBeat recorded 15 mentions for Devon Energy and 4 mentions for Vitesse Energy. Devon Energy's average media sentiment score of 0.94 beat Vitesse Energy's score of 0.82 indicating that Devon Energy is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Vitesse Energy currently has a consensus price target of $20.25, indicating a potential upside of 20.71%. Devon Energy has a consensus price target of $59.76, indicating a potential upside of 26.89%. Given Devon Energy's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Devon Energy is more favorable than Vitesse Energy.

Devon Energy has higher revenue and earnings than Vitesse Energy. Vitesse Energy is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Devon Energy, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Vitesse Energy has a beta of 0.6, suggesting that its stock price is 40% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Devon Energy has a beta of 0.37, suggesting that its stock price is 63% less volatile than the broader market.

51.6% of Vitesse Energy shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 69.7% of Devon Energy shares are owned by institutional investors. 13.9% of Vitesse Energy shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 4.6% of Devon Energy shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Vitesse Energy pays an annual dividend of $1.75 per share and has a dividend yield of 10.4%. Devon Energy pays an annual dividend of $1.28 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.7%. Vitesse Energy pays out -530.3% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Devon Energy pays out 30.4% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Vitesse Energy has raised its dividend for 2 consecutive years and Devon Energy has raised its dividend for 1 consecutive years. Vitesse Energy is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

Devon Energy has a net margin of 16.67% compared to Vitesse Energy's net margin of -3.95%. Devon Energy's return on equity of 14.93% beat Vitesse Energy's return on equity.

Magnolia Oil & Gas has a net margin of 28.77% compared to Vitesse Energy's net margin of -3.95%. Magnolia Oil & Gas' return on equity of 21.04% beat Vitesse Energy's return on equity.

In the previous week, Magnolia Oil & Gas had 6 more articles in the media than Vitesse Energy. MarketBeat recorded 10 mentions for Magnolia Oil & Gas and 4 mentions for Vitesse Energy. Vitesse Energy's average media sentiment score of 0.82 beat Magnolia Oil & Gas' score of 0.42 indicating that Vitesse Energy is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Magnolia Oil & Gas has higher revenue and earnings than Vitesse Energy. Vitesse Energy is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Magnolia Oil & Gas, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

51.6% of Vitesse Energy shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 94.7% of Magnolia Oil & Gas shares are held by institutional investors. 13.9% of Vitesse Energy shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.9% of Magnolia Oil & Gas shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Vitesse Energy has a beta of 0.6, indicating that its stock price is 40% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Magnolia Oil & Gas has a beta of 0.7, indicating that its stock price is 30% less volatile than the broader market.

Vitesse Energy currently has a consensus target price of $20.25, indicating a potential upside of 20.71%. Magnolia Oil & Gas has a consensus target price of $31.81, indicating a potential upside of 31.96%. Given Magnolia Oil & Gas' stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Magnolia Oil & Gas is more favorable than Vitesse Energy.

Vitesse Energy pays an annual dividend of $1.75 per share and has a dividend yield of 10.4%. Magnolia Oil & Gas pays an annual dividend of $0.72 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.0%. Vitesse Energy pays out -530.3% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Magnolia Oil & Gas pays out 31.6% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Vitesse Energy has raised its dividend for 2 consecutive years and Magnolia Oil & Gas has raised its dividend for 3 consecutive years. Vitesse Energy is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.