S&P 500   3,811.15
DOW   30,932.37
QQQ   314.14
S&P 500   3,811.15
DOW   30,932.37
QQQ   314.14
S&P 500   3,811.15
DOW   30,932.37
QQQ   314.14
S&P 500   3,811.15
DOW   30,932.37
QQQ   314.14
Log in
NYSE:PSX

Phillips 66 Competitors

$83.05
-1.59 (-1.88 %)
(As of 02/26/2021 12:00 AM ET)
Add
Compare
Today's Range
$80.16
Now: $83.05
$84.44
50-Day Range
$67.38
MA: $74.61
$87.25
52-Week Range
$40.04
Now: $83.05
$89.79
Volume4.78 million shs
Average Volume2.95 million shs
Market Capitalization$36.28 billion
P/E RatioN/A
Dividend Yield4.25%
Beta1.67

Competitors

Phillips 66 (NYSE:PSX) Vs. MPC, VLO, HFC, AMRS, REGI, and CLNE

Should you be buying PSX stock or one of its competitors? Companies in the sub-industry of "oil & gas refining & marketing" are considered alternatives and competitors to Phillips 66, including Marathon Petroleum (MPC), Valero Energy (VLO), HollyFrontier (HFC), Amyris (AMRS), Renewable Energy Group (REGI), and Clean Energy Fuels (CLNE).

Marathon Petroleum (NYSE:MPC) and Phillips 66 (NYSE:PSX) are both large-cap oils/energy companies, but which is the better stock? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their dividends, earnings, analyst recommendations, profitability, institutional ownership, valuation and risk.

Dividends

Marathon Petroleum pays an annual dividend of $2.32 per share and has a dividend yield of 4.2%. Phillips 66 pays an annual dividend of $3.60 per share and has a dividend yield of 4.3%. Marathon Petroleum pays out 47.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Phillips 66 pays out 44.7% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Marathon Petroleum has increased its dividend for 1 consecutive years and Phillips 66 has increased its dividend for 1 consecutive years. Phillips 66 is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

Analyst Ratings

This is a breakdown of current recommendations for Marathon Petroleum and Phillips 66, as reported by MarketBeat.

Sell RatingsHold RatingsBuy RatingsStrong Buy RatingsRating Score
Marathon Petroleum141202.65
Phillips 66031502.83

Marathon Petroleum currently has a consensus target price of $47.80, indicating a potential downside of 12.49%. Phillips 66 has a consensus target price of $73.2353, indicating a potential downside of 11.82%. Given Phillips 66's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Phillips 66 is more favorable than Marathon Petroleum.

Earnings and Valuation

This table compares Marathon Petroleum and Phillips 66's top-line revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

Gross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Marathon Petroleum$124.88 billion0.28$2.64 billion$4.9411.06
Phillips 66$109.56 billion0.33$3.08 billion$8.0510.32

Phillips 66 has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Marathon Petroleum. Phillips 66 is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Marathon Petroleum, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Profitability

This table compares Marathon Petroleum and Phillips 66's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Net MarginsReturn on EquityReturn on Assets
Marathon Petroleum-11.11%-1.81%-0.68%
Phillips 66-3.45%3.38%1.47%

Volatility & Risk

Marathon Petroleum has a beta of 2.24, indicating that its stock price is 124% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Phillips 66 has a beta of 1.67, indicating that its stock price is 67% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Institutional and Insider Ownership

73.7% of Marathon Petroleum shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 64.6% of Phillips 66 shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.8% of Marathon Petroleum shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 0.6% of Phillips 66 shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Summary

Phillips 66 beats Marathon Petroleum on 11 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

Phillips 66 (NYSE:PSX) and Valero Energy (NYSE:VLO) are both large-cap oils/energy companies, but which is the superior business? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their earnings, profitability, valuation, institutional ownership, analyst recommendations, risk and dividends.

Dividends

Phillips 66 pays an annual dividend of $3.60 per share and has a dividend yield of 4.3%. Valero Energy pays an annual dividend of $3.92 per share and has a dividend yield of 5.1%. Phillips 66 pays out 44.7% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Valero Energy pays out 68.8% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Phillips 66 has raised its dividend for 1 consecutive years and Valero Energy has raised its dividend for 1 consecutive years.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a summary of current recommendations and price targets for Phillips 66 and Valero Energy, as reported by MarketBeat.com.

Sell RatingsHold RatingsBuy RatingsStrong Buy RatingsRating Score
Phillips 66031502.83
Valero Energy121302.75

Phillips 66 currently has a consensus price target of $73.2353, indicating a potential downside of 11.82%. Valero Energy has a consensus price target of $69.8571, indicating a potential downside of 9.25%. Given Valero Energy's higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Valero Energy is more favorable than Phillips 66.

Earnings and Valuation

This table compares Phillips 66 and Valero Energy's top-line revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

Gross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Phillips 66$109.56 billion0.33$3.08 billion$8.0510.32
Valero Energy$108.32 billion0.29$2.42 billion$5.7013.51

Phillips 66 has higher revenue and earnings than Valero Energy. Phillips 66 is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Valero Energy, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Profitability

This table compares Phillips 66 and Valero Energy's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Net MarginsReturn on EquityReturn on Assets
Phillips 66-3.45%3.38%1.47%
Valero EnergyN/A0.18%0.07%

Volatility & Risk

Phillips 66 has a beta of 1.67, indicating that its share price is 67% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Valero Energy has a beta of 2.14, indicating that its share price is 114% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Institutional and Insider Ownership

64.6% of Phillips 66 shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 74.6% of Valero Energy shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.6% of Phillips 66 shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 0.3% of Valero Energy shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Summary

Phillips 66 beats Valero Energy on 11 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

Phillips 66 (NYSE:PSX) and HollyFrontier (NYSE:HFC) are both oils/energy companies, but which is the superior business? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their earnings, profitability, valuation, institutional ownership, analyst recommendations, risk and dividends.

Dividends

Phillips 66 pays an annual dividend of $3.60 per share and has a dividend yield of 4.3%. HollyFrontier pays an annual dividend of $1.40 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.7%. Phillips 66 pays out 44.7% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. HollyFrontier pays out 28.6% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Phillips 66 has raised its dividend for 1 consecutive years and HollyFrontier has raised its dividend for 1 consecutive years.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a summary of current recommendations and price targets for Phillips 66 and HollyFrontier, as reported by MarketBeat.com.

Sell RatingsHold RatingsBuy RatingsStrong Buy RatingsRating Score
Phillips 66031502.83
HollyFrontier26602.29

Phillips 66 currently has a consensus price target of $73.2353, indicating a potential downside of 11.82%. HollyFrontier has a consensus price target of $32.75, indicating a potential downside of 13.54%. Given Phillips 66's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, equities analysts clearly believe Phillips 66 is more favorable than HollyFrontier.

Earnings and Valuation

This table compares Phillips 66 and HollyFrontier's top-line revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

Gross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Phillips 66$109.56 billion0.33$3.08 billion$8.0510.32
HollyFrontier$17.49 billion0.35$772.39 million$4.907.73

Phillips 66 has higher revenue and earnings than HollyFrontier. HollyFrontier is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Phillips 66, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Profitability

This table compares Phillips 66 and HollyFrontier's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Net MarginsReturn on EquityReturn on Assets
Phillips 66-3.45%3.38%1.47%
HollyFrontier-3.34%0.93%0.49%

Volatility & Risk

Phillips 66 has a beta of 1.67, indicating that its share price is 67% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, HollyFrontier has a beta of 1.83, indicating that its share price is 83% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Institutional and Insider Ownership

64.6% of Phillips 66 shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 84.4% of HollyFrontier shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.6% of Phillips 66 shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 0.4% of HollyFrontier shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Summary

Phillips 66 beats HollyFrontier on 11 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

Phillips 66 (NYSE:PSX) and Amyris (NASDAQ:AMRS) are both oils/energy companies, but which is the superior business? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their earnings, profitability, valuation, institutional ownership, analyst recommendations, risk and dividends.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a summary of current recommendations and price targets for Phillips 66 and Amyris, as reported by MarketBeat.com.

Sell RatingsHold RatingsBuy RatingsStrong Buy RatingsRating Score
Phillips 66031502.83
Amyris00503.00

Phillips 66 currently has a consensus price target of $73.2353, indicating a potential downside of 11.82%. Amyris has a consensus price target of $10.3375, indicating a potential downside of 25.09%. Given Phillips 66's higher probable upside, equities analysts clearly believe Phillips 66 is more favorable than Amyris.

Earnings & Valuation

This table compares Phillips 66 and Amyris' gross revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

Gross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Phillips 66$109.56 billion0.33$3.08 billion$8.0510.32
Amyris$152.56 million21.64$-242,770,000.00($2.72)-5.07

Phillips 66 has higher revenue and earnings than Amyris. Amyris is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Phillips 66, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Profitability

This table compares Phillips 66 and Amyris' net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Net MarginsReturn on EquityReturn on Assets
Phillips 66-3.45%3.38%1.47%
Amyris-223.41%N/A-149.25%

Risk and Volatility

Phillips 66 has a beta of 1.67, suggesting that its share price is 67% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Amyris has a beta of 1.04, suggesting that its share price is 4% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Insider and Institutional Ownership

64.6% of Phillips 66 shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 43.5% of Amyris shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.6% of Phillips 66 shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 39.7% of Amyris shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Summary

Phillips 66 beats Amyris on 10 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

Phillips 66 (NYSE:PSX) and Renewable Energy Group (NASDAQ:REGI) are both oils/energy companies, but which is the superior business? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their earnings, profitability, valuation, institutional ownership, analyst recommendations, risk and dividends.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a summary of current recommendations and price targets for Phillips 66 and Renewable Energy Group, as reported by MarketBeat.com.

Sell RatingsHold RatingsBuy RatingsStrong Buy RatingsRating Score
Phillips 66031502.83
Renewable Energy Group01702.88

Phillips 66 currently has a consensus price target of $73.2353, indicating a potential downside of 11.82%. Renewable Energy Group has a consensus price target of $84.00, indicating a potential upside of 8.01%. Given Renewable Energy Group's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Renewable Energy Group is more favorable than Phillips 66.

Earnings & Valuation

This table compares Phillips 66 and Renewable Energy Group's gross revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

Gross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Phillips 66$109.56 billion0.33$3.08 billion$8.0510.32
Renewable Energy Group$2.64 billion1.16$389.73 million$3.7520.74

Phillips 66 has higher revenue and earnings than Renewable Energy Group. Phillips 66 is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Renewable Energy Group, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Profitability

This table compares Phillips 66 and Renewable Energy Group's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Net MarginsReturn on EquityReturn on Assets
Phillips 66-3.45%3.38%1.47%
Renewable Energy Group22.72%13.11%9.25%

Risk and Volatility

Phillips 66 has a beta of 1.67, suggesting that its share price is 67% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Renewable Energy Group has a beta of 1.19, suggesting that its share price is 19% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Insider and Institutional Ownership

64.6% of Phillips 66 shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 96.2% of Renewable Energy Group shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.6% of Phillips 66 shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 3.0% of Renewable Energy Group shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Summary

Renewable Energy Group beats Phillips 66 on 9 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

Phillips 66 (NYSE:PSX) and Clean Energy Fuels (NASDAQ:CLNE) are both oils/energy companies, but which is the superior business? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their earnings, profitability, valuation, institutional ownership, analyst recommendations, risk and dividends.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a summary of current recommendations and price targets for Phillips 66 and Clean Energy Fuels, as reported by MarketBeat.com.

Sell RatingsHold RatingsBuy RatingsStrong Buy RatingsRating Score
Phillips 66031502.83
Clean Energy Fuels01302.75

Phillips 66 currently has a consensus price target of $73.2353, indicating a potential downside of 11.82%. Clean Energy Fuels has a consensus price target of $18.6667, indicating a potential upside of 43.15%. Given Clean Energy Fuels' higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Clean Energy Fuels is more favorable than Phillips 66.

Earnings & Valuation

This table compares Phillips 66 and Clean Energy Fuels' gross revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

Gross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Phillips 66$109.56 billion0.33$3.08 billion$8.0510.32
Clean Energy Fuels$344.07 million7.51$20.42 million$0.10130.40

Phillips 66 has higher revenue and earnings than Clean Energy Fuels. Phillips 66 is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Clean Energy Fuels, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Profitability

This table compares Phillips 66 and Clean Energy Fuels' net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Net MarginsReturn on EquityReturn on Assets
Phillips 66-3.45%3.38%1.47%
Clean Energy Fuels10.04%6.34%4.70%

Risk and Volatility

Phillips 66 has a beta of 1.67, suggesting that its share price is 67% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Clean Energy Fuels has a beta of 2.02, suggesting that its share price is 102% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Insider and Institutional Ownership

64.6% of Phillips 66 shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 30.3% of Clean Energy Fuels shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.6% of Phillips 66 shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 3.9% of Clean Energy Fuels shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Summary

Clean Energy Fuels beats Phillips 66 on 8 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

Ad Crowdability
How to Earn a Fortune (OUTSIDE of Stocks)
Imagine turning every $1 you invest into $1,300… without risking a DIME on stocks. Former Lehman Brothers executive reveals one of Wall Street's best-kept secrets. This is a proven system for multiplying your wealth — without touching the stock market.

Phillips 66 Competitors List

Competitor NameCompetitor BTM RankCompetitor PriceCompetitor Price ChangeCompetitor Market CapCompetitor RevenueCompetitor P/E RatioCompetitor Indicator(s)
Marathon Petroleum logo
MPC
Marathon Petroleum
2.1$54.62-0.8%$35.54 billion$124.88 billion-3.61Analyst Report
Valero Energy logo
VLO
Valero Energy
2.0$76.98-1.5%$31.39 billion$108.32 billion-2,565.14Analyst Report
News Coverage
HollyFrontier logo
HFC
HollyFrontier
1.5$37.88-0.5%$6.14 billion$17.49 billion-14.51Earnings Announcement
Analyst Report
News Coverage
Amyris logo
AMRS
Amyris
1.1$13.80-0.1%$3.30 billion$152.56 million-6.19Upcoming Earnings
Analyst Report
Gap Down
Renewable Energy Group logo
REGI
Renewable Energy Group
1.8$77.77-10.5%$3.06 billion$2.64 billion5.62Earnings Announcement
Analyst Report
High Trading Volume
Analyst Revision
News Coverage
Gap Down
Clean Energy Fuels logo
CLNE
Clean Energy Fuels
1.2$13.04-1.5%$2.59 billion$344.07 million76.71Gap Up
CVR Energy logo
CVI
CVR Energy
1.0$22.08-4.1%$2.22 billion$6.36 billion-15.33Earnings Announcement
Analyst Report
Gap Down
World Fuel Services logo
INT
World Fuel Services
2.1$31.08-12.7%$1.97 billion$36.82 billion11.86Earnings Announcement
Analyst Downgrade
Insider Selling
High Trading Volume
News Coverage
Delek US logo
DK
Delek US
1.3$24.56-3.6%$1.81 billion$9.30 billion-6.36Earnings Announcement
Analyst Report
News Coverage
PBF Energy logo
PBF
PBF Energy
1.5$14.20-4.6%$1.71 billion$24.51 billion-1.62Analyst Report
Increase in Short Interest
Gap Down
Gevo logo
GEVO
Gevo
1.3$9.71-3.3%$1.50 billion$24.49 million-5.96Analyst Report
News Coverage
Gap Down
Green Plains logo
GPRE
Green Plains
1.2$25.32-4.3%$902.68 million$2.42 billion-8.92News Coverage
Gap Up
REX American Resources logo
REX
REX American Resources
0.9$94.07-0.0%$563.67 million$418.03 million144.72Analyst Downgrade
News Coverage
Gap Up
This page was last updated on 2/28/2021 by MarketBeat.com Staff

Enter your email address below to receive a concise daily summary of analysts' upgrades, downgrades and new coverage with MarketBeat.com's FREE daily email newsletter.