Free Trial

ConocoPhillips (COP) Competitors

ConocoPhillips logo
$134.12 -0.07 (-0.05%)
Closing price 10/9/2026 03:59 PM Eastern
Extended Trading
$134.30 +0.18 (+0.13%)
As of 10/9/2026 07:59 PM Eastern
Extended trading is trading that happens on electronic markets outside of regular trading hours. This is a fair market value extended hours price provided by Massive. Learn more.

COP vs. APA, FANG, CVE, CVX, and DVN

Should you buy ConocoPhillips stock or one of its competitors? ConocoPhillips's main competitors and comparable companies include APA (APA), Diamondback Energy (FANG), Cenovus Energy (CVE), Chevron (CVX), and Devon Energy (DVN). Companies are selected based on similarities in market, industry, and size. These companies are all part of the "oil, gas & consumable fuels" industry.

How does ConocoPhillips compare to APA?

ConocoPhillips (NYSE:COP) and APA (NASDAQ:APA) are both large-cap energy companies, but which is the superior investment? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their dividends, risk, analyst recommendations, earnings, profitability, media sentiment, institutional ownership and valuation.

In the previous week, ConocoPhillips had 12 more articles in the media than APA. MarketBeat recorded 37 mentions for ConocoPhillips and 25 mentions for APA. ConocoPhillips' average media sentiment score of 0.74 beat APA's score of 0.70 indicating that ConocoPhillips is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
ConocoPhillips
24 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
5 Neutral mention(s)
3 Negative mention(s)
3 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
APA
3 Very Positive mention(s)
4 Positive mention(s)
2 Neutral mention(s)
1 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

ConocoPhillips has a beta of 0.24, suggesting that its share price is 76% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, APA has a beta of 0.42, suggesting that its share price is 58% less volatile than the broader market.

82.4% of ConocoPhillips shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 83.0% of APA shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.1% of ConocoPhillips shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.7% of APA shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

ConocoPhillips has higher revenue and earnings than APA. APA is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than ConocoPhillips, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
ConocoPhillips$61.55B2.62$7.99B$7.5617.74
APA$9.22B1.74$1.43B$4.739.70

ConocoPhillips presently has a consensus price target of $143.29, indicating a potential upside of 6.84%. APA has a consensus price target of $43.21, indicating a potential downside of 5.83%. Given ConocoPhillips' stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, research analysts plainly believe ConocoPhillips is more favorable than APA.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
ConocoPhillips
2 Sell rating(s)
6 Hold rating(s)
17 Buy rating(s)
2 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.70
APA
4 Sell rating(s)
15 Hold rating(s)
11 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.29

APA has a net margin of 19.48% compared to ConocoPhillips' net margin of 14.22%. APA's return on equity of 24.84% beat ConocoPhillips' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
ConocoPhillips14.22% 14.72% 7.77%
APA 19.48%24.84%10.15%

ConocoPhillips pays an annual dividend of $3.36 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.5%. APA pays an annual dividend of $1.00 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.2%. ConocoPhillips pays out 44.4% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. APA pays out 21.1% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years.

Summary

ConocoPhillips beats APA on 12 of the 19 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does ConocoPhillips compare to Diamondback Energy?

ConocoPhillips (NYSE:COP) and Diamondback Energy (NASDAQ:FANG) are both large-cap energy companies, but which is the superior stock? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, dividends, institutional ownership, profitability, risk, media sentiment, valuation and earnings.

ConocoPhillips pays an annual dividend of $3.36 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.5%. Diamondback Energy pays an annual dividend of $4.40 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.3%. ConocoPhillips pays out 44.4% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Diamondback Energy pays out 85.8% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Diamondback Energy has increased its dividend for 7 consecutive years. ConocoPhillips is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

ConocoPhillips has a beta of 0.24, indicating that its share price is 76% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Diamondback Energy has a beta of 0.55, indicating that its share price is 45% less volatile than the broader market.

ConocoPhillips has a net margin of 14.22% compared to Diamondback Energy's net margin of 8.58%. ConocoPhillips' return on equity of 14.72% beat Diamondback Energy's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
ConocoPhillips14.22% 14.72% 7.77%
Diamondback Energy 8.58%10.10%6.16%

ConocoPhillips has higher revenue and earnings than Diamondback Energy. ConocoPhillips is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Diamondback Energy, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
ConocoPhillips$61.55B2.62$7.99B$7.5617.74
Diamondback Energy$16.98B3.17$1.66B$5.1337.45

ConocoPhillips presently has a consensus price target of $143.29, suggesting a potential upside of 6.84%. Diamondback Energy has a consensus price target of $231.84, suggesting a potential upside of 20.67%. Given Diamondback Energy's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Diamondback Energy is more favorable than ConocoPhillips.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
ConocoPhillips
2 Sell rating(s)
6 Hold rating(s)
17 Buy rating(s)
2 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.70
Diamondback Energy
0 Sell rating(s)
5 Hold rating(s)
14 Buy rating(s)
4 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.96

In the previous week, ConocoPhillips had 26 more articles in the media than Diamondback Energy. MarketBeat recorded 37 mentions for ConocoPhillips and 11 mentions for Diamondback Energy. Diamondback Energy's average media sentiment score of 0.89 beat ConocoPhillips' score of 0.74 indicating that Diamondback Energy is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
ConocoPhillips
24 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
5 Neutral mention(s)
3 Negative mention(s)
3 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
Diamondback Energy
5 Very Positive mention(s)
4 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

82.4% of ConocoPhillips shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 90.0% of Diamondback Energy shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.1% of ConocoPhillips shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.6% of Diamondback Energy shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Summary

ConocoPhillips and Diamondback Energy tied by winning 10 of the 20 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does ConocoPhillips compare to Cenovus Energy?

ConocoPhillips (NYSE:COP) and Cenovus Energy (NYSE:CVE) are both large-cap energy companies, but which is the superior investment? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their profitability, dividends, valuation, earnings, analyst recommendations, media sentiment, risk and institutional ownership.

ConocoPhillips presently has a consensus price target of $143.29, indicating a potential upside of 6.84%. Cenovus Energy has a consensus price target of $39.00, indicating a potential upside of 24.34%. Given Cenovus Energy's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Cenovus Energy is more favorable than ConocoPhillips.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
ConocoPhillips
2 Sell rating(s)
6 Hold rating(s)
17 Buy rating(s)
2 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.70
Cenovus Energy
0 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
12 Buy rating(s)
2 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.07

In the previous week, ConocoPhillips had 12 more articles in the media than Cenovus Energy. MarketBeat recorded 37 mentions for ConocoPhillips and 25 mentions for Cenovus Energy. ConocoPhillips' average media sentiment score of 0.74 beat Cenovus Energy's score of 0.73 indicating that ConocoPhillips is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
ConocoPhillips
24 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
5 Neutral mention(s)
3 Negative mention(s)
3 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
Cenovus Energy
8 Very Positive mention(s)
11 Positive mention(s)
4 Neutral mention(s)
1 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

82.4% of ConocoPhillips shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 51.2% of Cenovus Energy shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.1% of ConocoPhillips shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

ConocoPhillips has a beta of 0.24, indicating that its share price is 76% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Cenovus Energy has a beta of 0.46, indicating that its share price is 54% less volatile than the broader market.

ConocoPhillips has higher revenue and earnings than Cenovus Energy. Cenovus Energy is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than ConocoPhillips, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
ConocoPhillips$61.55B2.62$7.99B$7.5617.74
Cenovus Energy$35.57B1.61$2.81B$2.6012.06

ConocoPhillips has a net margin of 14.22% compared to Cenovus Energy's net margin of 12.37%. Cenovus Energy's return on equity of 21.08% beat ConocoPhillips' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
ConocoPhillips14.22% 14.72% 7.77%
Cenovus Energy 12.37%21.08%10.80%

ConocoPhillips pays an annual dividend of $3.36 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.5%. Cenovus Energy pays an annual dividend of $0.64 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.0%. ConocoPhillips pays out 44.4% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Cenovus Energy pays out 24.6% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Cenovus Energy has increased its dividend for 4 consecutive years.

Summary

ConocoPhillips beats Cenovus Energy on 12 of the 19 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does ConocoPhillips compare to Chevron?

Chevron (NYSE:CVX) and ConocoPhillips (NYSE:COP) are both large-cap energy companies, but which is the better business? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their earnings, valuation, media sentiment, dividends, profitability, analyst recommendations, institutional ownership and risk.

Chevron presently has a consensus target price of $210.24, indicating a potential downside of 0.77%. ConocoPhillips has a consensus target price of $143.29, indicating a potential upside of 6.84%. Given ConocoPhillips' higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe ConocoPhillips is more favorable than Chevron.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Chevron
1 Sell rating(s)
5 Hold rating(s)
21 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.79
ConocoPhillips
2 Sell rating(s)
6 Hold rating(s)
17 Buy rating(s)
2 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.70

ConocoPhillips has a net margin of 14.22% compared to Chevron's net margin of 9.57%. ConocoPhillips' return on equity of 14.72% beat Chevron's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Chevron9.57% 11.09% 6.54%
ConocoPhillips 14.22%14.72%7.77%

72.4% of Chevron shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 82.4% of ConocoPhillips shares are held by institutional investors. 0.6% of Chevron shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 0.1% of ConocoPhillips shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Chevron pays an annual dividend of $7.12 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.4%. ConocoPhillips pays an annual dividend of $3.36 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.5%. Chevron pays out 68.3% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. ConocoPhillips pays out 44.4% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Chevron has raised its dividend for 38 consecutive years. Chevron is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

Chevron has higher revenue and earnings than ConocoPhillips. ConocoPhillips is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Chevron, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Chevron$189.03B2.21$12.30B$10.4320.31
ConocoPhillips$61.55B2.62$7.99B$7.5617.74

In the previous week, Chevron had 47 more articles in the media than ConocoPhillips. MarketBeat recorded 84 mentions for Chevron and 37 mentions for ConocoPhillips. ConocoPhillips' average media sentiment score of 0.74 beat Chevron's score of 0.35 indicating that ConocoPhillips is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Chevron
30 Very Positive mention(s)
12 Positive mention(s)
21 Neutral mention(s)
13 Negative mention(s)
7 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral
ConocoPhillips
24 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
5 Neutral mention(s)
3 Negative mention(s)
3 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

Chevron has a beta of 0.53, suggesting that its share price is 47% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, ConocoPhillips has a beta of 0.24, suggesting that its share price is 76% less volatile than the broader market.

Summary

Chevron beats ConocoPhillips on 11 of the 20 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does ConocoPhillips compare to Devon Energy?

ConocoPhillips (NYSE:COP) and Devon Energy (NYSE:DVN) are both large-cap energy companies, but which is the superior investment? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their earnings, analyst recommendations, dividends, institutional ownership, valuation, risk, media sentiment and profitability.

ConocoPhillips has higher revenue and earnings than Devon Energy. Devon Energy is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than ConocoPhillips, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
ConocoPhillips$61.55B2.62$7.99B$7.5617.74
Devon Energy$17.19B3.09$2.64B$4.2111.46

In the previous week, ConocoPhillips had 8 more articles in the media than Devon Energy. MarketBeat recorded 37 mentions for ConocoPhillips and 29 mentions for Devon Energy. Devon Energy's average media sentiment score of 1.05 beat ConocoPhillips' score of 0.74 indicating that Devon Energy is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
ConocoPhillips
24 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
5 Neutral mention(s)
3 Negative mention(s)
3 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
Devon Energy
18 Very Positive mention(s)
7 Positive mention(s)
3 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

82.4% of ConocoPhillips shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 69.7% of Devon Energy shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.1% of ConocoPhillips shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 4.6% of Devon Energy shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

ConocoPhillips has a beta of 0.24, meaning that its share price is 76% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Devon Energy has a beta of 0.49, meaning that its share price is 51% less volatile than the broader market.

ConocoPhillips pays an annual dividend of $3.36 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.5%. Devon Energy pays an annual dividend of $1.28 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.7%. ConocoPhillips pays out 44.4% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Devon Energy pays out 30.4% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Devon Energy has raised its dividend for 1 consecutive years. Devon Energy is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

ConocoPhillips currently has a consensus price target of $143.29, suggesting a potential upside of 6.84%. Devon Energy has a consensus price target of $60.19, suggesting a potential upside of 24.76%. Given Devon Energy's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Devon Energy is more favorable than ConocoPhillips.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
ConocoPhillips
2 Sell rating(s)
6 Hold rating(s)
17 Buy rating(s)
2 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.70
Devon Energy
0 Sell rating(s)
4 Hold rating(s)
24 Buy rating(s)
2 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.93

Devon Energy has a net margin of 16.67% compared to ConocoPhillips' net margin of 14.22%. Devon Energy's return on equity of 14.93% beat ConocoPhillips' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
ConocoPhillips14.22% 14.72% 7.77%
Devon Energy 16.67%14.93%7.91%

Summary

Devon Energy beats ConocoPhillips on 13 of the 19 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get ConocoPhillips News Delivered to You Automatically

Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for COP and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.

Subscribe Now
SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding COP and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.
Skip Chart

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of NYSE and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Skip Chart

COP vs. The Competition

MetricConocoPhillipsOil, Gas & Consumable Fuels IndustryEnergy SectorNYSE Exchange
Market Cap$161.21B$11.70B$10.21B$22.94B
Dividend Yield2.50%10.17%10.66%3.72%
P/E Ratio17.7417.2820.4728.60
Price / Sales2.62603.19493.0814.92
Price / Cash8.4541.2437.2937.72
Price / Book2.574.534.094.72
Net Income$7.99B$5.27B$4.35B$1.07B
7 Day Performance5.79%0.47%0.63%0.35%
1 Month Performance-2.16%-4.02%-3.78%-2.93%
1 Year Performance52.70%32.47%33.76%9.25%

ConocoPhillips Competitors List

CompanyMarketRankShare PriceAnalysts' Price Target1Y Price PerformanceMarket CapRevenueP/E RatioEmployee CountIndicator(s)
COP
ConocoPhillips
4.0844 of 5 stars
$134.12
-0.1%
$143.29
+6.8%
+45.9%$161.21B$61.55B17.749,900
APA
APA
3.0767 of 5 stars
$42.33
-1.0%
$43.14
+1.9%
+93.9%$14.83B$9.22B8.951,791
FANG
Diamondback Energy
4.4463 of 5 stars
$185.23
-0.8%
$226.33
+22.2%
+33.2%$51.87B$15.03B36.111,762
CVE
Cenovus Energy
4.5583 of 5 stars
$31.12
+0.6%
$39.00
+25.3%
+73.2%$57.33B$35.57B11.977,211
CVX
Chevron
4.213 of 5 stars
$206.34
+0.9%
$207.65
+0.6%
+39.7%$407.68B$189.03B19.7843,039

Related Companies and Tools


This page (NYSE:COP) was last updated on 10/10/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.
From Our Partners