Which has better earnings and valuation, COP or APA?

ConocoPhillips has higher revenue and earnings than APA. APA is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than ConocoPhillips, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks. Company Gross Revenue Price/Sales Ratio Net Income Earnings Per Share Price/Earnings Ratio ConocoPhillips $61.55B 2.57 $7.99B $7.56 17.43 APA $9.22B 1.71 $1.43B $4.73 9.49

Is COP or APA more profitable?

APA has a net margin of 19.48% compared to ConocoPhillips' net margin of 14.22%. APA's return on equity of 24.84% beat ConocoPhillips' return on equity. Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets ConocoPhillips 14.22% 14.72% 7.77% APA 19.48% 24.84% 10.15%

Does the media refer more to COP or APA?

In the previous week, APA had 6 more articles in the media than ConocoPhillips. MarketBeat recorded 23 mentions for APA and 17 mentions for ConocoPhillips. APA's average media sentiment score of 0.65 beat ConocoPhillips' score of 0.32 indicating that APA is being referred to more favorably in the news media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment ConocoPhillips 7 Very Positive mention(s) 3 Positive mention(s) 3 Neutral mention(s) 2 Negative mention(s) 2 Very Negative mention(s) Neutral APA 7 Very Positive mention(s) 3 Positive mention(s) 5 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 1 Very Negative mention(s) Positive

Does the media prefer FANG or COP?

In the previous week, Diamondback Energy had 23 more articles in the media than ConocoPhillips. MarketBeat recorded 40 mentions for Diamondback Energy and 17 mentions for ConocoPhillips. Diamondback Energy's average media sentiment score of 0.74 beat ConocoPhillips' score of 0.32 indicating that Diamondback Energy is being referred to more favorably in the media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment Diamondback Energy 13 Very Positive mention(s) 7 Positive mention(s) 4 Neutral mention(s) 2 Negative mention(s) 1 Very Negative mention(s) Positive ConocoPhillips 7 Very Positive mention(s) 3 Positive mention(s) 3 Neutral mention(s) 2 Negative mention(s) 2 Very Negative mention(s) Neutral

Does the media favor COP or CVE?

In the previous week, ConocoPhillips had 5 more articles in the media than Cenovus Energy. MarketBeat recorded 17 mentions for ConocoPhillips and 12 mentions for Cenovus Energy. Cenovus Energy's average media sentiment score of 1.14 beat ConocoPhillips' score of 0.32 indicating that Cenovus Energy is being referred to more favorably in the news media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment ConocoPhillips 7 Very Positive mention(s) 3 Positive mention(s) 3 Neutral mention(s) 2 Negative mention(s) 2 Very Negative mention(s) Neutral Cenovus Energy 6 Very Positive mention(s) 4 Positive mention(s) 1 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive

Which has higher valuation and earnings, COP or CVX?

Chevron has higher revenue and earnings than ConocoPhillips. ConocoPhillips is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Chevron, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks. Company Gross Revenue Price/Sales Ratio Net Income Earnings Per Share Price/Earnings Ratio ConocoPhillips $61.55B 2.57 $7.99B $7.56 17.43 Chevron $189.03B 2.19 $12.30B $10.43 20.09

Is COP or CVX more profitable?

ConocoPhillips has a net margin of 14.22% compared to Chevron's net margin of 9.57%. ConocoPhillips' return on equity of 14.72% beat Chevron's return on equity. Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets ConocoPhillips 14.22% 14.72% 7.77% Chevron 9.57% 11.09% 6.54%

Does the media refer more to COP or CVX?

In the previous week, Chevron had 28 more articles in the media than ConocoPhillips. MarketBeat recorded 45 mentions for Chevron and 17 mentions for ConocoPhillips. Chevron's average media sentiment score of 0.55 beat ConocoPhillips' score of 0.32 indicating that Chevron is being referred to more favorably in the news media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment ConocoPhillips 7 Very Positive mention(s) 3 Positive mention(s) 3 Neutral mention(s) 2 Negative mention(s) 2 Very Negative mention(s) Neutral Chevron 18 Very Positive mention(s) 10 Positive mention(s) 11 Neutral mention(s) 2 Negative mention(s) 4 Very Negative mention(s) Positive

Does the media favor COP or DVN?

In the previous week, Devon Energy had 7 more articles in the media than ConocoPhillips. MarketBeat recorded 24 mentions for Devon Energy and 17 mentions for ConocoPhillips. Devon Energy's average media sentiment score of 1.26 beat ConocoPhillips' score of 0.32 indicating that Devon Energy is being referred to more favorably in the news media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment ConocoPhillips 7 Very Positive mention(s) 3 Positive mention(s) 3 Neutral mention(s) 2 Negative mention(s) 2 Very Negative mention(s) Neutral Devon Energy 19 Very Positive mention(s) 3 Positive mention(s) 0 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive

ConocoPhillips (COP) Competitors

$131.78 -1.41 (-1.06%)

Closing price 09/18/2026 03:59 PM Eastern

Extended Trading

$131.50 -0.27 (-0.21%)

As of 09/18/2026 07:59 PM Eastern

Compare

COP vs. APA, FANG, CVE, CVX, and DVN

Should you buy ConocoPhillips stock or one of its competitors? ConocoPhillips's main competitors and comparable companies include APA (APA), Diamondback Energy (FANG), Cenovus Energy (CVE), Chevron (CVX), and Devon Energy (DVN). Companies are selected based on similarities in market, industry, and size. These companies are all part of the "oil, gas & consumable fuels" industry.

How does ConocoPhillips compare to APA?

ConocoPhillips (NYSE:COP) and APA (NASDAQ:APA) are both large-cap energy companies, but which is the superior business? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, valuation, earnings, profitability, media sentiment, institutional ownership, risk and dividends.

ConocoPhillips pays an annual dividend of $3.36 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.5%. APA pays an annual dividend of $1.00 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.2%. ConocoPhillips pays out 44.4% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. APA pays out 21.1% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years.

ConocoPhillips has a beta of 0.13, meaning that its share price is 87% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, APA has a beta of 0.37, meaning that its share price is 63% less volatile than the broader market.

ConocoPhillips currently has a consensus target price of $141.24, indicating a potential upside of 7.18%. APA has a consensus target price of $42.97, indicating a potential downside of 4.24%. Given ConocoPhillips' stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, equities analysts plainly believe ConocoPhillips is more favorable than APA.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
ConocoPhillips	2 Sell rating(s)	8 Hold rating(s)	17 Buy rating(s)	1 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.61
APA	4 Sell rating(s)	16 Hold rating(s)	11 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.23

ConocoPhillips has higher revenue and earnings than APA. APA is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than ConocoPhillips, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
ConocoPhillips	$61.55B	2.57	$7.99B	$7.56	17.43
APA	$9.22B	1.71	$1.43B	$4.73	9.49

82.4% of ConocoPhillips shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 83.0% of APA shares are held by institutional investors. 0.1% of ConocoPhillips shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.7% of APA shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

In the previous week, APA had 6 more articles in the media than ConocoPhillips. MarketBeat recorded 23 mentions for APA and 17 mentions for ConocoPhillips. APA's average media sentiment score of 0.65 beat ConocoPhillips' score of 0.32 indicating that APA is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
ConocoPhillips	7 Very Positive mention(s)	3 Positive mention(s)	3 Neutral mention(s)	2 Negative mention(s)	2 Very Negative mention(s)	Neutral
APA	7 Very Positive mention(s)	3 Positive mention(s)	5 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	1 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive

APA has a net margin of 19.48% compared to ConocoPhillips' net margin of 14.22%. APA's return on equity of 24.84% beat ConocoPhillips' return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
ConocoPhillips	14.22%	14.72%	7.77%
APA	19.48%	24.84%	10.15%

Summary

ConocoPhillips beats APA on 10 of the 19 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does ConocoPhillips compare to Diamondback Energy?

Diamondback Energy (NASDAQ:FANG) and ConocoPhillips (NYSE:COP) are both large-cap energy companies, but which is the better investment? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their institutional ownership, dividends, earnings, risk, analyst recommendations, valuation, profitability and media sentiment.

90.0% of Diamondback Energy shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 82.4% of ConocoPhillips shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.6% of Diamondback Energy shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 0.1% of ConocoPhillips shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Diamondback Energy presently has a consensus target price of $226.33, suggesting a potential upside of 17.62%. ConocoPhillips has a consensus target price of $141.24, suggesting a potential upside of 7.18%. Given Diamondback Energy's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, equities research analysts clearly believe Diamondback Energy is more favorable than ConocoPhillips.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Diamondback Energy	0 Sell rating(s)	5 Hold rating(s)	16 Buy rating(s)	4 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.96
ConocoPhillips	2 Sell rating(s)	8 Hold rating(s)	17 Buy rating(s)	1 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.61

Diamondback Energy pays an annual dividend of $4.40 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.3%. ConocoPhillips pays an annual dividend of $3.36 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.5%. Diamondback Energy pays out 85.8% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. ConocoPhillips pays out 44.4% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Diamondback Energy has increased its dividend for 7 consecutive years. ConocoPhillips is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

ConocoPhillips has higher revenue and earnings than Diamondback Energy. ConocoPhillips is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Diamondback Energy, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Diamondback Energy	$15.03B	3.59	$1.66B	$5.13	37.51
ConocoPhillips	$61.55B	2.57	$7.99B	$7.56	17.43

Diamondback Energy has a beta of 0.43, indicating that its stock price is 57% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, ConocoPhillips has a beta of 0.13, indicating that its stock price is 87% less volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, Diamondback Energy had 23 more articles in the media than ConocoPhillips. MarketBeat recorded 40 mentions for Diamondback Energy and 17 mentions for ConocoPhillips. Diamondback Energy's average media sentiment score of 0.74 beat ConocoPhillips' score of 0.32 indicating that Diamondback Energy is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Diamondback Energy	13 Very Positive mention(s)	7 Positive mention(s)	4 Neutral mention(s)	2 Negative mention(s)	1 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive
ConocoPhillips	7 Very Positive mention(s)	3 Positive mention(s)	3 Neutral mention(s)	2 Negative mention(s)	2 Very Negative mention(s)	Neutral

ConocoPhillips has a net margin of 14.22% compared to Diamondback Energy's net margin of 8.58%. ConocoPhillips' return on equity of 14.72% beat Diamondback Energy's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Diamondback Energy	8.58%	10.10%	6.16%
ConocoPhillips	14.22%	14.72%	7.77%

Summary

Diamondback Energy beats ConocoPhillips on 11 of the 20 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does ConocoPhillips compare to Cenovus Energy?

ConocoPhillips (NYSE:COP) and Cenovus Energy (NYSE:CVE) are both large-cap energy companies, but which is the superior stock? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their earnings, analyst recommendations, institutional ownership, profitability, valuation, media sentiment, dividends and risk.

ConocoPhillips has a net margin of 14.22% compared to Cenovus Energy's net margin of 12.37%. Cenovus Energy's return on equity of 21.08% beat ConocoPhillips' return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
ConocoPhillips	14.22%	14.72%	7.77%
Cenovus Energy	12.37%	21.08%	10.80%

82.4% of ConocoPhillips shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 51.2% of Cenovus Energy shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.1% of ConocoPhillips shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

ConocoPhillips has higher revenue and earnings than Cenovus Energy. Cenovus Energy is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than ConocoPhillips, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
ConocoPhillips	$61.55B	2.57	$7.99B	$7.56	17.43
Cenovus Energy	$35.57B	1.69	$2.81B	$2.60	12.53

ConocoPhillips has a beta of 0.13, suggesting that its share price is 87% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Cenovus Energy has a beta of 0.35, suggesting that its share price is 65% less volatile than the broader market.

ConocoPhillips presently has a consensus price target of $141.24, suggesting a potential upside of 7.18%. Cenovus Energy has a consensus price target of $39.00, suggesting a potential upside of 19.70%. Given Cenovus Energy's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Cenovus Energy is more favorable than ConocoPhillips.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
ConocoPhillips	2 Sell rating(s)	8 Hold rating(s)	17 Buy rating(s)	1 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.61
Cenovus Energy	0 Sell rating(s)	2 Hold rating(s)	12 Buy rating(s)	1 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.93

ConocoPhillips pays an annual dividend of $3.36 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.5%. Cenovus Energy pays an annual dividend of $0.64 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.0%. ConocoPhillips pays out 44.4% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Cenovus Energy pays out 24.6% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Cenovus Energy has raised its dividend for 4 consecutive years.

In the previous week, ConocoPhillips had 5 more articles in the media than Cenovus Energy. MarketBeat recorded 17 mentions for ConocoPhillips and 12 mentions for Cenovus Energy. Cenovus Energy's average media sentiment score of 1.14 beat ConocoPhillips' score of 0.32 indicating that Cenovus Energy is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
ConocoPhillips	7 Very Positive mention(s)	3 Positive mention(s)	3 Neutral mention(s)	2 Negative mention(s)	2 Very Negative mention(s)	Neutral
Cenovus Energy	6 Very Positive mention(s)	4 Positive mention(s)	1 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive

Summary

ConocoPhillips beats Cenovus Energy on 11 of the 19 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does ConocoPhillips compare to Chevron?

ConocoPhillips (NYSE:COP) and Chevron (NYSE:CVX) are both large-cap energy companies, but which is the superior stock? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their dividends, earnings, risk, valuation, analyst recommendations, profitability, institutional ownership and media sentiment.

ConocoPhillips pays an annual dividend of $3.36 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.5%. Chevron pays an annual dividend of $7.12 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.4%. ConocoPhillips pays out 44.4% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Chevron pays out 68.3% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Chevron has increased its dividend for 38 consecutive years. Chevron is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

Chevron has higher revenue and earnings than ConocoPhillips. ConocoPhillips is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Chevron, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
ConocoPhillips	$61.55B	2.57	$7.99B	$7.56	17.43
Chevron	$189.03B	2.19	$12.30B	$10.43	20.09

ConocoPhillips has a beta of 0.13, meaning that its share price is 87% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Chevron has a beta of 0.5, meaning that its share price is 50% less volatile than the broader market.

ConocoPhillips presently has a consensus price target of $141.24, indicating a potential upside of 7.18%. Chevron has a consensus price target of $211.35, indicating a potential upside of 0.84%. Given ConocoPhillips' higher probable upside, equities research analysts plainly believe ConocoPhillips is more favorable than Chevron.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
ConocoPhillips	2 Sell rating(s)	8 Hold rating(s)	17 Buy rating(s)	1 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.61
Chevron	1 Sell rating(s)	5 Hold rating(s)	20 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.73

In the previous week, Chevron had 28 more articles in the media than ConocoPhillips. MarketBeat recorded 45 mentions for Chevron and 17 mentions for ConocoPhillips. Chevron's average media sentiment score of 0.55 beat ConocoPhillips' score of 0.32 indicating that Chevron is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
ConocoPhillips	7 Very Positive mention(s)	3 Positive mention(s)	3 Neutral mention(s)	2 Negative mention(s)	2 Very Negative mention(s)	Neutral
Chevron	18 Very Positive mention(s)	10 Positive mention(s)	11 Neutral mention(s)	2 Negative mention(s)	4 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive

ConocoPhillips has a net margin of 14.22% compared to Chevron's net margin of 9.57%. ConocoPhillips' return on equity of 14.72% beat Chevron's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
ConocoPhillips	14.22%	14.72%	7.77%
Chevron	9.57%	11.09%	6.54%

82.4% of ConocoPhillips shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 72.4% of Chevron shares are held by institutional investors. 0.1% of ConocoPhillips shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.6% of Chevron shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Summary

Chevron beats ConocoPhillips on 12 of the 20 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does ConocoPhillips compare to Devon Energy?

ConocoPhillips (NYSE:COP) and Devon Energy (NYSE:DVN) are both large-cap energy companies, but which is the superior business? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their institutional ownership, valuation, earnings, profitability, analyst recommendations, dividends, media sentiment and risk.

ConocoPhillips presently has a consensus target price of $141.24, suggesting a potential upside of 7.18%. Devon Energy has a consensus target price of $59.76, suggesting a potential upside of 23.09%. Given Devon Energy's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Devon Energy is more favorable than ConocoPhillips.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
ConocoPhillips	2 Sell rating(s)	8 Hold rating(s)	17 Buy rating(s)	1 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.61
Devon Energy	0 Sell rating(s)	5 Hold rating(s)	23 Buy rating(s)	2 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.90

ConocoPhillips pays an annual dividend of $3.36 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.5%. Devon Energy pays an annual dividend of $1.28 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.6%. ConocoPhillips pays out 44.4% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Devon Energy pays out 30.4% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Devon Energy has raised its dividend for 1 consecutive years. Devon Energy is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

82.4% of ConocoPhillips shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 69.7% of Devon Energy shares are held by institutional investors. 0.1% of ConocoPhillips shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 4.6% of Devon Energy shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

In the previous week, Devon Energy had 7 more articles in the media than ConocoPhillips. MarketBeat recorded 24 mentions for Devon Energy and 17 mentions for ConocoPhillips. Devon Energy's average media sentiment score of 1.26 beat ConocoPhillips' score of 0.32 indicating that Devon Energy is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
ConocoPhillips	7 Very Positive mention(s)	3 Positive mention(s)	3 Neutral mention(s)	2 Negative mention(s)	2 Very Negative mention(s)	Neutral
Devon Energy	19 Very Positive mention(s)	3 Positive mention(s)	0 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive

Devon Energy has a net margin of 16.67% compared to ConocoPhillips' net margin of 14.22%. Devon Energy's return on equity of 14.93% beat ConocoPhillips' return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
ConocoPhillips	14.22%	14.72%	7.77%
Devon Energy	16.67%	14.93%	7.91%

ConocoPhillips has a beta of 0.13, suggesting that its share price is 87% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Devon Energy has a beta of 0.37, suggesting that its share price is 63% less volatile than the broader market.

ConocoPhillips has higher revenue and earnings than Devon Energy. Devon Energy is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than ConocoPhillips, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
ConocoPhillips	$61.55B	2.57	$7.99B	$7.56	17.43
Devon Energy	$17.19B	3.11	$2.64B	$4.21	11.53

Summary

Devon Energy beats ConocoPhillips on 15 of the 20 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get ConocoPhillips News Delivered to You Automatically

Subscribe Now

SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding COP and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of NYSE and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.

COP vs. The Competition

Export

Metric	ConocoPhillips	Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels Industry	Energy Sector	NYSE Exchange
Market Cap	$158.37B	$11.55B	$10.07B	$23.10B
Dividend Yield	2.55%	10.09%	10.56%	3.62%
P/E Ratio	17.43	17.91	21.10	28.19
Price / Sales	2.57	634.16	518.16	20.34
Price / Cash	8.30	39.99	36.25	36.36
Price / Book	2.52	4.65	4.19	4.67
Net Income	$7.99B	$5.28B	$4.35B	$1.07B
7 Day Performance	-3.92%	5.03%	3.64%	-1.64%
1 Month Performance	0.81%	2.50%	1.65%	-4.25%
1 Year Performance	43.41%	37.61%	38.10%	8.32%

ConocoPhillips Competitors List

Export

Company	MarketRank	Share Price	Analysts' Price Target	1Y Price Performance	Market Cap	Revenue	P/E Ratio	Employee Count	Indicator(s)
COP ConocoPhillips	3.6605 of 5 stars	$131.78 -1.1%	$141.24 +7.2%	+40.9%	$158.37B	$61.55B	17.43	9,900	High Trading Volume
APA APA	3.4729 of 5 stars	$42.77 flat	$42.07 -1.6%	+87.7%	$14.98B	$9.22B	9.04	1,791	Dividend Announcement Analyst Upgrade Buyback Announcement Analyst Revision
FANG Diamondback Energy	3.6885 of 5 stars	$199.22 flat	$222.21 +11.5%	+36.8%	$55.79B	$15.03B	38.83	1,762	Trending News Analyst Forecast Analyst Revision
CVE Cenovus Energy	4.2525 of 5 stars	$32.40 +0.1%	$39.00 +20.4%	+86.6%	$59.69B	$35.57B	12.46	7,211	Positive News Ex-Dividend Analyst Forecast
CVX Chevron	4.2928 of 5 stars	$208.48 -0.1%	$211.35 +1.4%	+31.9%	$411.91B	$189.03B	19.99	43,039	Trending News

Related Companies and Tools

Related Companies

Top 10 Stock Comparisons

This page (NYSE:COP) was last updated on 9/19/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.

From Our Partners

Unlock superior investment research and tools.

Get MarketBeat All Access

In-depth profiles and analysis for 20,000 public companies.
Real-time analyst ratings, insider transactions, earnings data, and more.
Our daily ratings and market update email newsletter.

Sign In
Create Account

Your Email Address:

Your Password:

Forgot your password?

Your Email Address:

Choose a Password:

By creating a free account, you agree to our terms of service. This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

ConocoPhillips (COP) Competitors

COP vs. APA, FANG, CVE, CVX, and DVN

How does ConocoPhillips compare to APA?

Summary

How does ConocoPhillips compare to Diamondback Energy?

Summary

How does ConocoPhillips compare to Cenovus Energy?

Summary

How does ConocoPhillips compare to Chevron?

Summary

How does ConocoPhillips compare to Devon Energy?

Summary

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

Media Sentiment Over Time

COP vs. The Competition

ConocoPhillips Competitors List

Related Companies and Tools

Best-in-Class Portfolio Monitoring

Stock Ideas and Recommendations

Advanced Stock Screeners and Research Tools

About MarketBeat

MarketBeat Products

Popular Tools

Financial Calendars

Terms & Info

ConocoPhillips (COP) Competitors

COP vs. APA, FANG, CVE, CVX, and DVN

How does ConocoPhillips compare to APA?

Is COP or APA a better dividend stock?

Which has more volatility and risk, COP or APA?

Do analysts prefer COP or APA?

Which has better earnings and valuation, COP or APA?

Do insiders & institutionals have more ownership in COP or APA?

Does the media refer more to COP or APA?

Is COP or APA more profitable?

Summary

How does ConocoPhillips compare to Diamondback Energy?

Do insiders & institutionals have more ownership in FANG or COP?

Do analysts rate FANG or COP?

Is FANG or COP a better dividend stock?

Which has better earnings & valuation, FANG or COP?

Which has more risk and volatility, FANG or COP?

Does the media prefer FANG or COP?

Is FANG or COP more profitable?

Summary

How does ConocoPhillips compare to Cenovus Energy?

Is COP or CVE more profitable?

Do insiders and institutionals have more ownership in COP or CVE?

Which has better valuation & earnings, COP or CVE?

Which has more volatility and risk, COP or CVE?

Do analysts rate COP or CVE?

Is COP or CVE a better dividend stock?

Does the media favor COP or CVE?

Summary

How does ConocoPhillips compare to Chevron?

Is COP or CVX a better dividend stock?

Which has higher valuation and earnings, COP or CVX?

Which has more risk and volatility, COP or CVX?

Do analysts rate COP or CVX?

Does the media refer more to COP or CVX?

Is COP or CVX more profitable?

Do institutionals and insiders believe in COP or CVX?

Summary

How does ConocoPhillips compare to Devon Energy?

Do analysts recommend COP or DVN?

Is COP or DVN a better dividend stock?

Do insiders and institutionals have more ownership in COP or DVN?

Does the media favor COP or DVN?

Is COP or DVN more profitable?

Which has more volatility & risk, COP or DVN?

Which has stronger valuation & earnings, COP or DVN?

Summary

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

Media Sentiment Over Time

COP vs. The Competition

ConocoPhillips Competitors List

Related Companies and Tools

MarketBeat All Access Features

Best-in-Class Portfolio Monitoring

Stock Ideas and Recommendations

Advanced Stock Screeners and Research Tools