ConocoPhillips (COP) Competitors

In the previous week, ConocoPhillips had 16 more articles in the media than Diamondback Energy. MarketBeat recorded 57 mentions for ConocoPhillips and 41 mentions for Diamondback Energy. ConocoPhillips' average media sentiment score of 0.97 beat Diamondback Energy's score of 0.95 indicating that ConocoPhillips is being referred to more favorably in the media.

82.4% of ConocoPhillips shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 90.0% of Diamondback Energy shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.1% of ConocoPhillips shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 0.6% of Diamondback Energy shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

ConocoPhillips has a beta of 0.11, suggesting that its stock price is 89% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Diamondback Energy has a beta of 0.43, suggesting that its stock price is 57% less volatile than the broader market.

ConocoPhillips has a net margin of 14.22% compared to Diamondback Energy's net margin of 8.58%. ConocoPhillips' return on equity of 14.72% beat Diamondback Energy's return on equity.

ConocoPhillips pays an annual dividend of $3.36 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.9%. Diamondback Energy pays an annual dividend of $4.40 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.3%. ConocoPhillips pays out 44.4% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Diamondback Energy pays out 85.8% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Diamondback Energy has increased its dividend for 7 consecutive years. ConocoPhillips is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

ConocoPhillips has higher revenue and earnings than Diamondback Energy. ConocoPhillips is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Diamondback Energy, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

ConocoPhillips presently has a consensus target price of $136.44, indicating a potential upside of 16.14%. Diamondback Energy has a consensus target price of $222.35, indicating a potential upside of 18.25%. Given Diamondback Energy's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Diamondback Energy is more favorable than ConocoPhillips.

Cenovus Energy pays an annual dividend of $0.64 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.3%. ConocoPhillips pays an annual dividend of $3.36 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.9%. Cenovus Energy pays out 24.6% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. ConocoPhillips pays out 44.4% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Cenovus Energy has raised its dividend for 4 consecutive years.

51.2% of Cenovus Energy shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 82.4% of ConocoPhillips shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.1% of ConocoPhillips shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Cenovus Energy currently has a consensus price target of $36.25, suggesting a potential upside of 28.43%. ConocoPhillips has a consensus price target of $136.44, suggesting a potential upside of 16.14%. Given Cenovus Energy's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, research analysts plainly believe Cenovus Energy is more favorable than ConocoPhillips.

In the previous week, ConocoPhillips had 52 more articles in the media than Cenovus Energy. MarketBeat recorded 57 mentions for ConocoPhillips and 5 mentions for Cenovus Energy. Cenovus Energy's average media sentiment score of 1.07 beat ConocoPhillips' score of 0.97 indicating that Cenovus Energy is being referred to more favorably in the media.

ConocoPhillips has a net margin of 14.22% compared to Cenovus Energy's net margin of 12.37%. Cenovus Energy's return on equity of 21.08% beat ConocoPhillips' return on equity.

ConocoPhillips has higher revenue and earnings than Cenovus Energy. Cenovus Energy is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than ConocoPhillips, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Cenovus Energy has a beta of 0.34, meaning that its stock price is 66% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, ConocoPhillips has a beta of 0.11, meaning that its stock price is 89% less volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, Chevron had 35 more articles in the media than ConocoPhillips. MarketBeat recorded 92 mentions for Chevron and 57 mentions for ConocoPhillips. ConocoPhillips' average media sentiment score of 0.97 beat Chevron's score of 0.53 indicating that ConocoPhillips is being referred to more favorably in the media.

ConocoPhillips pays an annual dividend of $3.36 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.9%. Chevron pays an annual dividend of $7.12 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.8%. ConocoPhillips pays out 44.4% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Chevron pays out 68.3% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Chevron has raised its dividend for 38 consecutive years. Chevron is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

ConocoPhillips has a net margin of 14.22% compared to Chevron's net margin of 9.57%. ConocoPhillips' return on equity of 14.72% beat Chevron's return on equity.

ConocoPhillips presently has a consensus price target of $136.44, suggesting a potential upside of 16.14%. Chevron has a consensus price target of $207.48, suggesting a potential upside of 11.29%. Given ConocoPhillips' higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe ConocoPhillips is more favorable than Chevron.

ConocoPhillips has a beta of 0.11, meaning that its stock price is 89% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Chevron has a beta of 0.49, meaning that its stock price is 51% less volatile than the broader market.

82.4% of ConocoPhillips shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 72.4% of Chevron shares are held by institutional investors. 0.1% of ConocoPhillips shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.6% of Chevron shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Chevron has higher revenue and earnings than ConocoPhillips. ConocoPhillips is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Chevron, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

In the previous week, ConocoPhillips had 8 more articles in the media than Devon Energy. MarketBeat recorded 57 mentions for ConocoPhillips and 49 mentions for Devon Energy. Devon Energy's average media sentiment score of 1.30 beat ConocoPhillips' score of 0.97 indicating that Devon Energy is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Devon Energy has a beta of 0.38, indicating that its stock price is 62% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, ConocoPhillips has a beta of 0.11, indicating that its stock price is 89% less volatile than the broader market.

ConocoPhillips has higher revenue and earnings than Devon Energy. Devon Energy is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than ConocoPhillips, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Devon Energy pays an annual dividend of $1.28 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.0%. ConocoPhillips pays an annual dividend of $3.36 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.9%. Devon Energy pays out 30.4% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. ConocoPhillips pays out 44.4% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Devon Energy has increased its dividend for 1 consecutive years. Devon Energy is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

Devon Energy has a net margin of 16.67% compared to ConocoPhillips' net margin of 14.22%. Devon Energy's return on equity of 14.93% beat ConocoPhillips' return on equity.

69.7% of Devon Energy shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 82.4% of ConocoPhillips shares are owned by institutional investors. 4.6% of Devon Energy shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 0.1% of ConocoPhillips shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Devon Energy presently has a consensus target price of $59.72, indicating a potential upside of 39.08%. ConocoPhillips has a consensus target price of $136.44, indicating a potential upside of 16.14%. Given Devon Energy's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, research analysts clearly believe Devon Energy is more favorable than ConocoPhillips.