ConocoPhillips (COP) Competitors

ConocoPhillips has higher revenue and earnings than Diamondback Energy. ConocoPhillips is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Diamondback Energy, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

ConocoPhillips has a net margin of 14.22% compared to Diamondback Energy's net margin of 8.58%. ConocoPhillips' return on equity of 14.72% beat Diamondback Energy's return on equity.

In the previous week, ConocoPhillips had 29 more articles in the media than Diamondback Energy. MarketBeat recorded 69 mentions for ConocoPhillips and 40 mentions for Diamondback Energy. Diamondback Energy's average media sentiment score of 1.65 beat ConocoPhillips' score of 1.47 indicating that Diamondback Energy is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Diamondback Energy presently has a consensus price target of $222.21, indicating a potential upside of 12.41%. ConocoPhillips has a consensus price target of $140.29, indicating a potential upside of 7.54%. Given Diamondback Energy's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, equities analysts clearly believe Diamondback Energy is more favorable than ConocoPhillips.

90.0% of Diamondback Energy shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 82.4% of ConocoPhillips shares are held by institutional investors. 0.6% of Diamondback Energy shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.1% of ConocoPhillips shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Diamondback Energy has a beta of 0.43, meaning that its stock price is 57% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, ConocoPhillips has a beta of 0.11, meaning that its stock price is 89% less volatile than the broader market.

Diamondback Energy pays an annual dividend of $4.40 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.2%. ConocoPhillips pays an annual dividend of $3.36 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.6%. Diamondback Energy pays out 85.8% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. ConocoPhillips pays out 44.4% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Diamondback Energy has increased its dividend for 7 consecutive years. ConocoPhillips is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

ConocoPhillips has a net margin of 14.22% compared to Cenovus Energy's net margin of 12.37%. Cenovus Energy's return on equity of 21.08% beat ConocoPhillips' return on equity.

ConocoPhillips pays an annual dividend of $3.36 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.6%. Cenovus Energy pays an annual dividend of $0.64 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.0%. ConocoPhillips pays out 44.4% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Cenovus Energy pays out 24.6% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Cenovus Energy has raised its dividend for 4 consecutive years.

82.4% of ConocoPhillips shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 51.2% of Cenovus Energy shares are held by institutional investors. 0.1% of ConocoPhillips shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

ConocoPhillips has a beta of 0.11, indicating that its stock price is 89% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Cenovus Energy has a beta of 0.34, indicating that its stock price is 66% less volatile than the broader market.

ConocoPhillips has higher revenue and earnings than Cenovus Energy. Cenovus Energy is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than ConocoPhillips, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

ConocoPhillips presently has a consensus price target of $140.29, indicating a potential upside of 7.54%. Cenovus Energy has a consensus price target of $36.25, indicating a potential upside of 14.72%. Given Cenovus Energy's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Cenovus Energy is more favorable than ConocoPhillips.

In the previous week, ConocoPhillips had 45 more articles in the media than Cenovus Energy. MarketBeat recorded 69 mentions for ConocoPhillips and 24 mentions for Cenovus Energy. Cenovus Energy's average media sentiment score of 1.62 beat ConocoPhillips' score of 1.47 indicating that Cenovus Energy is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Chevron has a beta of 0.49, meaning that its share price is 51% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, ConocoPhillips has a beta of 0.11, meaning that its share price is 89% less volatile than the broader market.

72.4% of Chevron shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 82.4% of ConocoPhillips shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.6% of Chevron shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 0.1% of ConocoPhillips shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Chevron has higher revenue and earnings than ConocoPhillips. ConocoPhillips is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Chevron, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

In the previous week, Chevron had 68 more articles in the media than ConocoPhillips. MarketBeat recorded 137 mentions for Chevron and 69 mentions for ConocoPhillips. ConocoPhillips' average media sentiment score of 1.47 beat Chevron's score of 1.46 indicating that ConocoPhillips is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Chevron pays an annual dividend of $7.12 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.5%. ConocoPhillips pays an annual dividend of $3.36 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.6%. Chevron pays out 68.3% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. ConocoPhillips pays out 44.4% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Chevron has raised its dividend for 38 consecutive years. Chevron is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

Chevron currently has a consensus price target of $207.48, indicating a potential upside of 2.69%. ConocoPhillips has a consensus price target of $140.29, indicating a potential upside of 7.54%. Given ConocoPhillips' higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe ConocoPhillips is more favorable than Chevron.

ConocoPhillips has a net margin of 14.22% compared to Chevron's net margin of 9.57%. ConocoPhillips' return on equity of 14.72% beat Chevron's return on equity.

69.7% of Devon Energy shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 82.4% of ConocoPhillips shares are owned by institutional investors. 4.6% of Devon Energy shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 0.1% of ConocoPhillips shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Devon Energy pays an annual dividend of $1.28 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.7%. ConocoPhillips pays an annual dividend of $3.36 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.6%. Devon Energy pays out 30.4% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. ConocoPhillips pays out 44.4% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Devon Energy has raised its dividend for 1 consecutive years. Devon Energy is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

In the previous week, ConocoPhillips had 30 more articles in the media than Devon Energy. MarketBeat recorded 69 mentions for ConocoPhillips and 39 mentions for Devon Energy. Devon Energy's average media sentiment score of 1.68 beat ConocoPhillips' score of 1.47 indicating that Devon Energy is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Devon Energy has a beta of 0.38, meaning that its share price is 62% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, ConocoPhillips has a beta of 0.11, meaning that its share price is 89% less volatile than the broader market.

Devon Energy has a net margin of 16.67% compared to ConocoPhillips' net margin of 14.22%. Devon Energy's return on equity of 14.93% beat ConocoPhillips' return on equity.

ConocoPhillips has higher revenue and earnings than Devon Energy. Devon Energy is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than ConocoPhillips, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Devon Energy presently has a consensus price target of $59.15, suggesting a potential upside of 24.74%. ConocoPhillips has a consensus price target of $140.29, suggesting a potential upside of 7.54%. Given Devon Energy's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Devon Energy is more favorable than ConocoPhillips.