NASDAQ:CLNE

Clean Energy Fuels Competitors

$11.61
+0.43 (+3.85 %)
(As of 04/13/2021 03:27 PM ET)
Add
Compare
Today's Range
$10.79
Now: $11.61
$11.63
50-Day Range
$10.71
MA: $13.65
$15.94
52-Week Range
$1.61
Now: $11.61
$19.79
Volume159,071 shs
Average Volume8.28 million shs
Market Capitalization$2.31 billion
P/E Ratio68.29
Dividend YieldN/A
Beta2.02

Competitors

Clean Energy Fuels (NASDAQ:CLNE) Vs. MPC, PSX, VLO, HFC, AMRS, and REGI

Should you be buying CLNE stock or one of its competitors? Companies in the sub-industry of "oil & gas refining & marketing" are considered alternatives and competitors to Clean Energy Fuels, including Marathon Petroleum (MPC), Phillips 66 (PSX), Valero Energy (VLO), HollyFrontier (HFC), Amyris (AMRS), and Renewable Energy Group (REGI).

Clean Energy Fuels (NASDAQ:CLNE) and Marathon Petroleum (NYSE:MPC) are both utilities companies, but which is the better investment? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their risk, earnings, analyst recommendations, dividends, profitability, institutional ownership and valuation.

Insider and Institutional Ownership

30.3% of Clean Energy Fuels shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 73.7% of Marathon Petroleum shares are owned by institutional investors. 3.9% of Clean Energy Fuels shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 0.8% of Marathon Petroleum shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Risk & Volatility

Clean Energy Fuels has a beta of 2.02, suggesting that its stock price is 102% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Marathon Petroleum has a beta of 2.24, suggesting that its stock price is 124% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Profitability

This table compares Clean Energy Fuels and Marathon Petroleum's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Net MarginsReturn on EquityReturn on Assets
Clean Energy Fuels10.04%6.34%4.70%
Marathon Petroleum-11.11%-1.81%-0.68%

Analyst Recommendations

This is a breakdown of recent ratings and recommmendations for Clean Energy Fuels and Marathon Petroleum, as reported by MarketBeat.com.

Sell RatingsHold RatingsBuy RatingsStrong Buy RatingsRating Score
Clean Energy Fuels02302.60
Marathon Petroleum031202.80

Clean Energy Fuels currently has a consensus target price of $17.50, indicating a potential upside of 57.09%. Marathon Petroleum has a consensus target price of $50.3333, indicating a potential downside of 4.22%. Given Clean Energy Fuels' higher possible upside, equities analysts plainly believe Clean Energy Fuels is more favorable than Marathon Petroleum.

Earnings & Valuation

This table compares Clean Energy Fuels and Marathon Petroleum's revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

Gross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Clean Energy Fuels$344.07 million6.66$20.42 million$0.10115.00
Marathon Petroleum$124.88 billion0.27$2.64 billion$4.9410.62

Marathon Petroleum has higher revenue and earnings than Clean Energy Fuels. Marathon Petroleum is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Clean Energy Fuels, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Clean Energy Fuels (NASDAQ:CLNE) and Phillips 66 (NYSE:PSX) are both utilities companies, but which is the better investment? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their risk, earnings, analyst recommendations, dividends, profitability, institutional ownership and valuation.

Insider and Institutional Ownership

30.3% of Clean Energy Fuels shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 64.6% of Phillips 66 shares are owned by institutional investors. 3.9% of Clean Energy Fuels shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 0.6% of Phillips 66 shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Risk & Volatility

Clean Energy Fuels has a beta of 2.02, suggesting that its stock price is 102% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Phillips 66 has a beta of 1.67, suggesting that its stock price is 67% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Profitability

This table compares Clean Energy Fuels and Phillips 66's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Net MarginsReturn on EquityReturn on Assets
Clean Energy Fuels10.04%6.34%4.70%
Phillips 66-3.45%3.38%1.47%

Analyst Recommendations

This is a breakdown of recent ratings and recommmendations for Clean Energy Fuels and Phillips 66, as reported by MarketBeat.com.

Sell RatingsHold RatingsBuy RatingsStrong Buy RatingsRating Score
Clean Energy Fuels02302.60
Phillips 66041302.76

Clean Energy Fuels currently has a consensus target price of $17.50, indicating a potential upside of 57.09%. Phillips 66 has a consensus target price of $82.1250, indicating a potential upside of 5.91%. Given Clean Energy Fuels' higher possible upside, equities analysts plainly believe Clean Energy Fuels is more favorable than Phillips 66.

Earnings & Valuation

This table compares Clean Energy Fuels and Phillips 66's revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

Gross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Clean Energy Fuels$344.07 million6.66$20.42 million$0.10115.00
Phillips 66$109.56 billion0.31$3.08 billion$8.059.64

Phillips 66 has higher revenue and earnings than Clean Energy Fuels. Phillips 66 is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Clean Energy Fuels, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Summary

Clean Energy Fuels beats Phillips 66 on 8 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

Clean Energy Fuels (NASDAQ:CLNE) and Valero Energy (NYSE:VLO) are both utilities companies, but which is the better investment? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their risk, earnings, analyst recommendations, dividends, profitability, institutional ownership and valuation.

Profitability

This table compares Clean Energy Fuels and Valero Energy's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Net MarginsReturn on EquityReturn on Assets
Clean Energy Fuels10.04%6.34%4.70%
Valero EnergyN/A0.18%0.07%

Earnings & Valuation

This table compares Clean Energy Fuels and Valero Energy's revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

Gross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Clean Energy Fuels$344.07 million6.66$20.42 million$0.10115.00
Valero Energy$108.32 billion0.26$2.42 billion$5.7012.26

Valero Energy has higher revenue and earnings than Clean Energy Fuels. Valero Energy is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Clean Energy Fuels, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Risk & Volatility

Clean Energy Fuels has a beta of 2.02, suggesting that its stock price is 102% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Valero Energy has a beta of 2.14, suggesting that its stock price is 114% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Insider and Institutional Ownership

30.3% of Clean Energy Fuels shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 74.6% of Valero Energy shares are owned by institutional investors. 3.9% of Clean Energy Fuels shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 0.3% of Valero Energy shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a breakdown of recent ratings and recommmendations for Clean Energy Fuels and Valero Energy, as reported by MarketBeat.com.

Sell RatingsHold RatingsBuy RatingsStrong Buy RatingsRating Score
Clean Energy Fuels02302.60
Valero Energy111402.81

Clean Energy Fuels currently has a consensus target price of $17.50, indicating a potential upside of 57.09%. Valero Energy has a consensus target price of $78.3333, indicating a potential upside of 12.24%. Given Clean Energy Fuels' higher possible upside, equities analysts plainly believe Clean Energy Fuels is more favorable than Valero Energy.

HollyFrontier (NYSE:HFC) and Clean Energy Fuels (NASDAQ:CLNE) are both mid-cap oils/energy companies, but which is the better business? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their risk, dividends, profitability, analyst recommendations, valuation, earnings and institutional ownership.

Profitability

This table compares HollyFrontier and Clean Energy Fuels' net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Net MarginsReturn on EquityReturn on Assets
HollyFrontier-3.34%0.93%0.49%
Clean Energy Fuels10.04%6.34%4.70%

Valuation and Earnings

This table compares HollyFrontier and Clean Energy Fuels' top-line revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

Gross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
HollyFrontier$17.49 billion0.32$772.39 million$4.907.07
Clean Energy Fuels$344.07 million6.66$20.42 million$0.10115.00

HollyFrontier has higher revenue and earnings than Clean Energy Fuels. HollyFrontier is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Clean Energy Fuels, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Volatility and Risk

HollyFrontier has a beta of 1.83, meaning that its stock price is 83% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Clean Energy Fuels has a beta of 2.02, meaning that its stock price is 102% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Insider and Institutional Ownership

84.4% of HollyFrontier shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 30.3% of Clean Energy Fuels shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.4% of HollyFrontier shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 3.9% of Clean Energy Fuels shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a breakdown of current recommendations for HollyFrontier and Clean Energy Fuels, as reported by MarketBeat.

Sell RatingsHold RatingsBuy RatingsStrong Buy RatingsRating Score
HollyFrontier28502.20
Clean Energy Fuels02302.60

HollyFrontier presently has a consensus price target of $35.3077, indicating a potential upside of 2.16%. Clean Energy Fuels has a consensus price target of $17.50, indicating a potential upside of 57.09%. Given Clean Energy Fuels' stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Clean Energy Fuels is more favorable than HollyFrontier.

Summary

Clean Energy Fuels beats HollyFrontier on 9 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

Amyris (NASDAQ:AMRS) and Clean Energy Fuels (NASDAQ:CLNE) are both mid-cap basic materials companies, but which is the better business? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their risk, dividends, profitability, analyst recommendations, valuation, earnings and institutional ownership.

Profitability

This table compares Amyris and Clean Energy Fuels' net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Net MarginsReturn on EquityReturn on Assets
Amyris-223.41%N/A-149.25%
Clean Energy Fuels10.04%6.34%4.70%

Valuation and Earnings

This table compares Amyris and Clean Energy Fuels' top-line revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

Gross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Amyris$152.56 million27.62$-242,770,000.00($2.72)-5.67
Clean Energy Fuels$344.07 million6.66$20.42 million$0.10115.00

Clean Energy Fuels has higher revenue and earnings than Amyris. Amyris is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Clean Energy Fuels, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Volatility and Risk

Amyris has a beta of 1.04, meaning that its stock price is 4% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Clean Energy Fuels has a beta of 2.02, meaning that its stock price is 102% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Insider and Institutional Ownership

43.5% of Amyris shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 30.3% of Clean Energy Fuels shares are owned by institutional investors. 39.7% of Amyris shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 3.9% of Clean Energy Fuels shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a breakdown of current recommendations for Amyris and Clean Energy Fuels, as reported by MarketBeat.

Sell RatingsHold RatingsBuy RatingsStrong Buy RatingsRating Score
Amyris00503.00
Clean Energy Fuels02302.60

Amyris presently has a consensus price target of $17.87, indicating a potential upside of 16.42%. Clean Energy Fuels has a consensus price target of $17.50, indicating a potential upside of 57.09%. Given Clean Energy Fuels' higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Clean Energy Fuels is more favorable than Amyris.

Summary

Clean Energy Fuels beats Amyris on 9 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

Renewable Energy Group (NASDAQ:REGI) and Clean Energy Fuels (NASDAQ:CLNE) are both mid-cap oils/energy companies, but which is the better business? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their risk, dividends, profitability, analyst recommendations, valuation, earnings and institutional ownership.

Profitability

This table compares Renewable Energy Group and Clean Energy Fuels' net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Net MarginsReturn on EquityReturn on Assets
Renewable Energy Group22.72%13.11%9.25%
Clean Energy Fuels10.04%6.34%4.70%

Volatility and Risk

Renewable Energy Group has a beta of 1.19, meaning that its stock price is 19% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Clean Energy Fuels has a beta of 2.02, meaning that its stock price is 102% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Valuation and Earnings

This table compares Renewable Energy Group and Clean Energy Fuels' top-line revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

Gross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Renewable Energy Group$2.64 billion0.99$389.73 million$3.7515.78
Clean Energy Fuels$344.07 million6.66$20.42 million$0.10115.00

Renewable Energy Group has higher revenue and earnings than Clean Energy Fuels. Renewable Energy Group is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Clean Energy Fuels, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Insider and Institutional Ownership

96.2% of Renewable Energy Group shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 30.3% of Clean Energy Fuels shares are owned by institutional investors. 3.0% of Renewable Energy Group shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 3.9% of Clean Energy Fuels shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a breakdown of current recommendations for Renewable Energy Group and Clean Energy Fuels, as reported by MarketBeat.

Sell RatingsHold RatingsBuy RatingsStrong Buy RatingsRating Score
Renewable Energy Group02802.80
Clean Energy Fuels02302.60

Renewable Energy Group presently has a consensus price target of $89.1250, indicating a potential upside of 51.78%. Clean Energy Fuels has a consensus price target of $17.50, indicating a potential upside of 57.09%. Given Clean Energy Fuels' higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Clean Energy Fuels is more favorable than Renewable Energy Group.

Summary

Renewable Energy Group beats Clean Energy Fuels on 9 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

Ad Stock Street News
Live Streaming Stocks Explode
Lockdown fueled growth explodes live-streaming service.

Clean Energy Fuels Competitors List

Competitor NameCompetitor BTM RankCompetitor PriceCompetitor Price ChangeCompetitor Market CapCompetitor RevenueCompetitor P/E RatioCompetitor Indicator(s)
Marathon Petroleum logo
MPC
Marathon Petroleum
2.2$52.48+0.5%$34.00 billion$124.88 billion-3.47
Phillips 66 logo
PSX
Phillips 66
1.7$77.59+0.0%$33.99 billion$109.56 billion-12.58
Valero Energy logo
VLO
Valero Energy
2.2$69.88+0.6%$28.72 billion$108.32 billion-2,328.56Analyst Report
Decrease in Short Interest
News Coverage
HollyFrontier logo
HFC
HollyFrontier
2.2$34.62+0.1%$5.63 billion$17.49 billion-13.26
Amyris logo
AMRS
Amyris
1.3$15.42+0.8%$4.25 billion$152.56 million-6.91
Renewable Energy Group logo
REGI
Renewable Energy Group
2.4$59.17+2.9%$2.70 billion$2.64 billion4.28
World Fuel Services logo
INT
World Fuel Services
1.9$33.26+1.1%$2.12 billion$36.82 billion12.69
CVR Energy logo
CVI
CVR Energy
1.0$18.63+0.4%$1.87 billion$6.36 billion-12.94
PBF Energy logo
PBF
PBF Energy
1.4$13.18+0.5%$1.59 billion$24.51 billion-1.51Analyst Upgrade
Decrease in Short Interest
News Coverage
Delek US logo
DK
Delek US
1.1$21.00+0.4%$1.56 billion$9.30 billion-5.44
Gevo logo
GEVO
Gevo
1.3$7.13+2.5%$1.45 billion$24.49 million-4.37Increase in Short Interest
Green Plains logo
GPRE
Green Plains
1.4$25.84+0.7%$1.16 billion$2.42 billion-9.10
REX American Resources logo
REX
REX American Resources
0.9$83.50+0.8%$504.29 million$418.03 million128.46Decrease in Short Interest
This page was last updated on 4/13/2021 by MarketBeat.com Staff
MarketBeat - Stock Market News and Research Tools logo

MarketBeat empowers individual investors to make better trading decisions by providing real-time financial data and objective market analysis. Whether you’re looking for analyst ratings, corporate buybacks, dividends, earnings, economic reports, financials, insider trades, IPOs, SEC filings or stock splits, MarketBeat has the objective information you need to analyze any stock. Learn more.

MarketBeat is accredited by the Better Business Bureau

© American Consumer News, LLC dba MarketBeat® 2010-2021. All rights reserved.
326 E 8th St #105, Sioux Falls, SD 57103 | U.S. Based Support Team at [email protected] | (844) 978-6257
MarketBeat does not provide personalized financial advice and does not issue recommendations or offers to buy stock or sell any security. Learn more.

Our Accessibility Statement | Terms of Service | Do Not Sell My Information

© 2021 Market data provided is at least 10-minutes delayed and hosted by Barchart Solutions. Information is provided 'as-is' and solely for informational purposes, not for trading purposes or advice, and is delayed. To see all exchange delays and terms of use please see disclaimer. Fundamental company data provided by Zacks Investment Research. As a bonus to opt-ing into our email newsletters, you will also get a free subscription to the Liberty Through Wealth e-newsletter. You can opt out at any time.