QQQ   323.59 (+3.01%)
AAPL   127.79 (+5.39%)
MSFT   236.94 (+1.96%)
FB   264.91 (+2.83%)
GOOGL   2,069.66 (+2.36%)
TSLA   718.43 (+6.36%)
AMZN   3,146.14 (+1.72%)
NVDA   553.67 (+0.93%)
BABA   241.69 (+1.65%)
CGC   34.73 (+6.05%)
GE   13.11 (+4.55%)
MU   94.76 (+3.53%)
NIO   49.76 (+8.69%)
AMD   86.39 (+2.22%)
T   28.09 (+0.72%)
F   11.98 (+2.39%)
ACB   11.04 (+4.94%)
DIS   194.98 (+3.14%)
BA   224.39 (+5.84%)
NFLX   550.64 (+2.19%)
BAC   35.79 (+3.11%)
QQQ   323.59 (+3.01%)
AAPL   127.79 (+5.39%)
MSFT   236.94 (+1.96%)
FB   264.91 (+2.83%)
GOOGL   2,069.66 (+2.36%)
TSLA   718.43 (+6.36%)
AMZN   3,146.14 (+1.72%)
NVDA   553.67 (+0.93%)
BABA   241.69 (+1.65%)
CGC   34.73 (+6.05%)
GE   13.11 (+4.55%)
MU   94.76 (+3.53%)
NIO   49.76 (+8.69%)
AMD   86.39 (+2.22%)
T   28.09 (+0.72%)
F   11.98 (+2.39%)
ACB   11.04 (+4.94%)
DIS   194.98 (+3.14%)
BA   224.39 (+5.84%)
NFLX   550.64 (+2.19%)
BAC   35.79 (+3.11%)
QQQ   323.59 (+3.01%)
AAPL   127.79 (+5.39%)
MSFT   236.94 (+1.96%)
FB   264.91 (+2.83%)
GOOGL   2,069.66 (+2.36%)
TSLA   718.43 (+6.36%)
AMZN   3,146.14 (+1.72%)
NVDA   553.67 (+0.93%)
BABA   241.69 (+1.65%)
CGC   34.73 (+6.05%)
GE   13.11 (+4.55%)
MU   94.76 (+3.53%)
NIO   49.76 (+8.69%)
AMD   86.39 (+2.22%)
T   28.09 (+0.72%)
F   11.98 (+2.39%)
ACB   11.04 (+4.94%)
DIS   194.98 (+3.14%)
BA   224.39 (+5.84%)
NFLX   550.64 (+2.19%)
BAC   35.79 (+3.11%)
QQQ   323.59 (+3.01%)
AAPL   127.79 (+5.39%)
MSFT   236.94 (+1.96%)
FB   264.91 (+2.83%)
GOOGL   2,069.66 (+2.36%)
TSLA   718.43 (+6.36%)
AMZN   3,146.14 (+1.72%)
NVDA   553.67 (+0.93%)
BABA   241.69 (+1.65%)
CGC   34.73 (+6.05%)
GE   13.11 (+4.55%)
MU   94.76 (+3.53%)
NIO   49.76 (+8.69%)
AMD   86.39 (+2.22%)
T   28.09 (+0.72%)
F   11.98 (+2.39%)
ACB   11.04 (+4.94%)
DIS   194.98 (+3.14%)
BA   224.39 (+5.84%)
NFLX   550.64 (+2.19%)
BAC   35.79 (+3.11%)
Log in
NYSE:TTI

TETRA Technologies Competitors

$2.51
+0.01 (+0.40 %)
(As of 03/1/2021 12:00 AM ET)
Add
Compare
Today's Range
$2.48
Now: $2.51
$2.63
50-Day Range
$1.06
MA: $1.94
$2.69
52-Week Range
$0.22
Now: $2.51
$2.78
Volume2.51 million shs
Average Volume3.34 million shs
Market Capitalization$316.20 million
P/E RatioN/A
Dividend YieldN/A
Beta3.36

Competitors

TETRA Technologies (NYSE:TTI) Vs. SLB, HAL, NOV, FTI, RES, and OII

Should you be buying TTI stock or one of its competitors? Companies in the sub-industry of "oil & gas equipment & services" are considered alternatives and competitors to TETRA Technologies, including Schlumberger (SLB), Halliburton (HAL), NOV (NOV), TechnipFMC (FTI), RPC (RES), and Oceaneering International (OII).

TETRA Technologies (NYSE:TTI) and Schlumberger (NYSE:SLB) are both oils/energy companies, but which is the better business? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their earnings, risk, institutional ownership, profitability, valuation, analyst recommendations and dividends.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a breakdown of recent ratings for TETRA Technologies and Schlumberger, as reported by MarketBeat.

Sell RatingsHold RatingsBuy RatingsStrong Buy RatingsRating Score
TETRA Technologies02202.50
Schlumberger361702.54

TETRA Technologies currently has a consensus target price of $2.0625, indicating a potential downside of 17.83%. Schlumberger has a consensus target price of $22.9375, indicating a potential downside of 20.13%. Given TETRA Technologies' higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe TETRA Technologies is more favorable than Schlumberger.

Profitability

This table compares TETRA Technologies and Schlumberger's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Net MarginsReturn on EquityReturn on Assets
TETRA Technologies-17.78%-11.74%-1.24%
Schlumberger-40.15%7.34%2.46%

Institutional and Insider Ownership

44.2% of TETRA Technologies shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 73.2% of Schlumberger shares are owned by institutional investors. 5.4% of TETRA Technologies shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.6% of Schlumberger shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Earnings and Valuation

This table compares TETRA Technologies and Schlumberger's top-line revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

Gross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
TETRA Technologies$1.04 billion0.30$-147,410,000.00($0.05)-50.20
Schlumberger$32.92 billion1.21$-10,137,000,000.00$1.4719.54

TETRA Technologies has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Schlumberger. TETRA Technologies is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Schlumberger, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Risk and Volatility

TETRA Technologies has a beta of 3.36, suggesting that its stock price is 236% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Schlumberger has a beta of 2.28, suggesting that its stock price is 128% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Summary

Schlumberger beats TETRA Technologies on 8 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

TETRA Technologies (NYSE:TTI) and Halliburton (NYSE:HAL) are both oils/energy companies, but which is the better business? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their earnings, risk, institutional ownership, profitability, valuation, analyst recommendations and dividends.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a breakdown of recent ratings for TETRA Technologies and Halliburton, as reported by MarketBeat.

Sell RatingsHold RatingsBuy RatingsStrong Buy RatingsRating Score
TETRA Technologies02202.50
Halliburton3111022.42

TETRA Technologies currently has a consensus target price of $2.0625, indicating a potential downside of 17.83%. Halliburton has a consensus target price of $16.8190, indicating a potential downside of 26.91%. Given TETRA Technologies' stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe TETRA Technologies is more favorable than Halliburton.

Profitability

This table compares TETRA Technologies and Halliburton's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Net MarginsReturn on EquityReturn on Assets
TETRA Technologies-17.78%-11.74%-1.24%
Halliburton-26.60%11.10%3.08%

Institutional and Insider Ownership

44.2% of TETRA Technologies shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 75.4% of Halliburton shares are owned by institutional investors. 5.4% of TETRA Technologies shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.5% of Halliburton shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Earnings and Valuation

This table compares TETRA Technologies and Halliburton's top-line revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

Gross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
TETRA Technologies$1.04 billion0.30$-147,410,000.00($0.05)-50.20
Halliburton$22.41 billion0.91$-1,131,000,000.00$1.2418.56

TETRA Technologies has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Halliburton. TETRA Technologies is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Halliburton, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Risk and Volatility

TETRA Technologies has a beta of 3.36, suggesting that its stock price is 236% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Halliburton has a beta of 2.81, suggesting that its stock price is 181% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Summary

Halliburton beats TETRA Technologies on 8 of the 15 factors compared between the two stocks.

TETRA Technologies (NYSE:TTI) and NOV (NYSE:NOV) are both oils/energy companies, but which is the better business? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their earnings, risk, institutional ownership, profitability, valuation, analyst recommendations and dividends.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a breakdown of recent ratings for TETRA Technologies and NOV, as reported by MarketBeat.

Sell RatingsHold RatingsBuy RatingsStrong Buy RatingsRating Score
TETRA Technologies02202.50
NOV281102.43

TETRA Technologies currently has a consensus target price of $2.0625, indicating a potential downside of 17.83%. NOV has a consensus target price of $13.6059, indicating a potential downside of 13.01%. Given NOV's higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe NOV is more favorable than TETRA Technologies.

Profitability

This table compares TETRA Technologies and NOV's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Net MarginsReturn on EquityReturn on Assets
TETRA Technologies-17.78%-11.74%-1.24%
NOV-36.63%1.13%0.62%

Institutional and Insider Ownership

44.2% of TETRA Technologies shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 94.5% of NOV shares are owned by institutional investors. 5.4% of TETRA Technologies shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.9% of NOV shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Earnings and Valuation

This table compares TETRA Technologies and NOV's top-line revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

Gross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
TETRA Technologies$1.04 billion0.30$-147,410,000.00($0.05)-50.20
NOV$8.48 billion0.72$-6,095,000,000.00($0.72)-21.72

TETRA Technologies has higher earnings, but lower revenue than NOV. TETRA Technologies is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than NOV, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Risk and Volatility

TETRA Technologies has a beta of 3.36, suggesting that its stock price is 236% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, NOV has a beta of 2.22, suggesting that its stock price is 122% more volatile than the S&P 500.

TETRA Technologies (NYSE:TTI) and TechnipFMC (NYSE:FTI) are both oils/energy companies, but which is the better business? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their earnings, risk, institutional ownership, profitability, valuation, analyst recommendations and dividends.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a breakdown of recent ratings for TETRA Technologies and TechnipFMC, as reported by MarketBeat.

Sell RatingsHold RatingsBuy RatingsStrong Buy RatingsRating Score
TETRA Technologies02202.50
TechnipFMC010902.47

TETRA Technologies currently has a consensus target price of $2.0625, indicating a potential downside of 17.83%. TechnipFMC has a consensus target price of $10.0536, indicating a potential upside of 19.40%. Given TechnipFMC's higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe TechnipFMC is more favorable than TETRA Technologies.

Profitability

This table compares TETRA Technologies and TechnipFMC's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Net MarginsReturn on EquityReturn on Assets
TETRA Technologies-17.78%-11.74%-1.24%
TechnipFMC-42.41%1.56%0.38%

Institutional and Insider Ownership

44.2% of TETRA Technologies shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 77.5% of TechnipFMC shares are owned by institutional investors. 5.4% of TETRA Technologies shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.5% of TechnipFMC shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Earnings and Valuation

This table compares TETRA Technologies and TechnipFMC's top-line revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

Gross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
TETRA Technologies$1.04 billion0.30$-147,410,000.00($0.05)-50.20
TechnipFMC$13.41 billion0.28$-2,415,200,000.00$0.7411.38

TETRA Technologies has higher earnings, but lower revenue than TechnipFMC. TETRA Technologies is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than TechnipFMC, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Risk and Volatility

TETRA Technologies has a beta of 3.36, suggesting that its stock price is 236% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, TechnipFMC has a beta of 2.38, suggesting that its stock price is 138% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Summary

TechnipFMC beats TETRA Technologies on 8 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

TETRA Technologies (NYSE:TTI) and RPC (NYSE:RES) are both small-cap oils/energy companies, but which is the better business? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their earnings, risk, institutional ownership, profitability, valuation, analyst recommendations and dividends.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a breakdown of recent ratings for TETRA Technologies and RPC, as reported by MarketBeat.

Sell RatingsHold RatingsBuy RatingsStrong Buy RatingsRating Score
TETRA Technologies02202.50
RPC23101.83

TETRA Technologies currently has a consensus target price of $2.0625, indicating a potential downside of 17.83%. RPC has a consensus target price of $3.1786, indicating a potential downside of 50.72%. Given TETRA Technologies' stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe TETRA Technologies is more favorable than RPC.

Profitability

This table compares TETRA Technologies and RPC's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Net MarginsReturn on EquityReturn on Assets
TETRA Technologies-17.78%-11.74%-1.24%
RPC-32.86%-9.35%-7.44%

Institutional and Insider Ownership

44.2% of TETRA Technologies shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 25.7% of RPC shares are owned by institutional investors. 5.4% of TETRA Technologies shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 73.6% of RPC shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Earnings and Valuation

This table compares TETRA Technologies and RPC's top-line revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

Gross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
TETRA Technologies$1.04 billion0.30$-147,410,000.00($0.05)-50.20
RPC$1.22 billion1.13$-87,110,000.00($0.12)-53.75

RPC has higher revenue and earnings than TETRA Technologies. RPC is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than TETRA Technologies, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Risk and Volatility

TETRA Technologies has a beta of 3.36, suggesting that its stock price is 236% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, RPC has a beta of 2.13, suggesting that its stock price is 113% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Summary

TETRA Technologies beats RPC on 9 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

TETRA Technologies (NYSE:TTI) and Oceaneering International (NYSE:OII) are both small-cap oils/energy companies, but which is the better business? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their earnings, risk, institutional ownership, profitability, valuation, analyst recommendations and dividends.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a breakdown of recent ratings for TETRA Technologies and Oceaneering International, as reported by MarketBeat.

Sell RatingsHold RatingsBuy RatingsStrong Buy RatingsRating Score
TETRA Technologies02202.50
Oceaneering International09202.18

TETRA Technologies currently has a consensus target price of $2.0625, indicating a potential downside of 17.83%. Oceaneering International has a consensus target price of $7.9750, indicating a potential downside of 37.84%. Given TETRA Technologies' stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe TETRA Technologies is more favorable than Oceaneering International.

Profitability

This table compares TETRA Technologies and Oceaneering International's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Net MarginsReturn on EquityReturn on Assets
TETRA Technologies-17.78%-11.74%-1.24%
Oceaneering International-37.40%-3.56%-1.14%

Institutional and Insider Ownership

44.2% of TETRA Technologies shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 83.4% of Oceaneering International shares are owned by institutional investors. 5.4% of TETRA Technologies shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 1.8% of Oceaneering International shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Earnings and Valuation

This table compares TETRA Technologies and Oceaneering International's top-line revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

Gross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
TETRA Technologies$1.04 billion0.30$-147,410,000.00($0.05)-50.20
Oceaneering International$2.05 billion0.62$-348,440,000.00($0.82)-15.65

TETRA Technologies has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Oceaneering International. TETRA Technologies is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Oceaneering International, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Risk and Volatility

TETRA Technologies has a beta of 3.36, suggesting that its stock price is 236% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Oceaneering International has a beta of 3.6, suggesting that its stock price is 260% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Summary

Oceaneering International beats TETRA Technologies on 7 of the 13 factors compared between the two stocks.


TETRA Technologies Competitors List

Competitor NameCompetitor BTM RankCompetitor PriceCompetitor Price ChangeCompetitor Market CapCompetitor RevenueCompetitor P/E RatioCompetitor Indicator(s)
Schlumberger logo
SLB
Schlumberger
2.3$28.72+2.8%$39.99 billion$32.92 billion-3.77Gap Down
Halliburton logo
HAL
Halliburton
2.2$23.01+5.1%$20.45 billion$22.41 billion-4.63Gap Down
NOV logo
NOV
NOV
1.4$15.64+3.5%$6.07 billion$8.48 billion-2.32
TechnipFMC logo
FTI
TechnipFMC
2.2$8.42+2.4%$3.77 billion$13.41 billion-0.67Earnings Announcement
Analyst Downgrade
Increase in Short Interest
RPC logo
RES
RPC
1.2$6.45+1.6%$1.39 billion$1.22 billion-6.03Gap Down
Oceaneering International logo
OII
Oceaneering International
1.0$12.83+8.0%$1.27 billion$2.05 billion-1.73Earnings Announcement
Analyst Report
Gap Down
Dril-Quip logo
DRQ
Dril-Quip
0.6$36.20+6.2%$1.27 billion$414.81 million-109.69Earnings Announcement
Analyst Revision
Seacor logo
CKH
Seacor
1.4$42.50+0.0%$865.81 million$799.97 million81.73Increase in Short Interest
News Coverage
Helix Energy Solutions Group logo
HLX
Helix Energy Solutions Group
1.2$5.27+7.0%$791.35 million$751.91 million32.94Analyst Upgrade
Analyst Revision
Gap Down
Tidewater logo
TDW
Tidewater
0.9$12.84+3.0%$520.62 million$486.55 million-2.27Analyst Upgrade
Gap Down
Oil States International logo
OIS
Oil States International
1.2$7.98+8.1%$487.12 million$1.02 billion-0.76Gap Down
Matrix Service logo
MTRX
Matrix Service
1.1$14.32+5.2%$379.62 million$1.10 billion-9.01Gap Down
Newpark Resources logo
NR
Newpark Resources
1.3$3.92+11.7%$355.95 million$820.12 million-4.45Gap Down
RigNet logo
RNET
RigNet
0.8$9.61+3.5%$197.58 million$242.93 million-5.25Upcoming Earnings
Gap Down
Geospace Technologies logo
GEOS
Geospace Technologies
0.7$10.40+5.3%$141.33 million$87.83 million-7.27Gap Down
Natural Gas Services Group logo
NGS
Natural Gas Services Group
1.6$10.16+2.4%$136.85 million$78.44 million72.57Increase in Short Interest
Forum Energy Technologies logo
FET
Forum Energy Technologies
0.8$22.72+6.0%$126.69 million$956.50 million-1.67Earnings Announcement
Gap Down
Dawson Geophysical logo
DWSN
Dawson Geophysical
0.7$2.80+1.8%$65.74 million$145.77 million-5.83Decrease in Short Interest
Gulf Island Fabrication logo
GIFI
Gulf Island Fabrication
0.8$3.96+1.5%$60.69 million$303.31 million-1.30Upcoming Earnings
News Coverage
ION Geophysical logo
IO
ION Geophysical
1.1$3.12+2.6%$46.73 million$174.68 million-1.15Unusual Options Activity
Gap Down
This page was last updated on 3/1/2021 by MarketBeat.com Staff

Enter your email address below to receive a concise daily summary of analysts' upgrades, downgrades and new coverage with MarketBeat.com's FREE daily email newsletter.