NYSE:TTI

TETRA Technologies Competitors

$2.51

+0.01 (+0.40 %)

(As of 03/1/2021 12:00 AM ET)

Add

Compare

Today's Range

$2.48

Now: $2.51▼

$2.63

50-Day Range

$1.06

MA: $1.94▼

$2.69

52-Week Range

$0.22

Now: $2.51▼

$2.78

Volume2.51 million shs

Average Volume3.34 million shs

Market Capitalization$316.20 million

P/E RatioN/A

Dividend YieldN/A

Beta3.36

TETRA Technologies (NYSE:TTI) Vs. SLB, HAL, NOV, FTI, RES, and OII

Should you be buying TTI stock or one of its competitors? Companies in the sub-industry of "oil & gas equipment & services" are considered alternatives and competitors to TETRA Technologies, including Schlumberger (SLB), Halliburton (HAL), NOV (NOV), TechnipFMC (FTI), RPC (RES), and Oceaneering International (OII).

TETRA Technologies vs. Schlumberger Stock

TETRA Technologies (NYSE:TTI) and Schlumberger (NYSE:SLB) are both oils/energy companies, but which is the better business? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their earnings, risk, institutional ownership, profitability, valuation, analyst recommendations and dividends.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a breakdown of recent ratings for TETRA Technologies and Schlumberger, as reported by MarketBeat.

	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
TETRA Technologies	0	2	2	0	2.50
Schlumberger	3	6	17	0	2.54

TETRA Technologies currently has a consensus target price of $2.0625, indicating a potential downside of 17.83%. Schlumberger has a consensus target price of $22.9375, indicating a potential downside of 20.13%. Given TETRA Technologies' higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe TETRA Technologies is more favorable than Schlumberger.

Profitability

This table compares TETRA Technologies and Schlumberger's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
TETRA Technologies	-17.78%	-11.74%	-1.24%
Schlumberger	-40.15%	7.34%	2.46%

Institutional and Insider Ownership

44.2% of TETRA Technologies shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 73.2% of Schlumberger shares are owned by institutional investors. 5.4% of TETRA Technologies shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.6% of Schlumberger shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Earnings and Valuation

This table compares TETRA Technologies and Schlumberger's top-line revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
TETRA Technologies	$1.04 billion	0.30	$-147,410,000.00	($0.05)	-50.20
Schlumberger	$32.92 billion	1.21	$-10,137,000,000.00	$1.47	19.54

TETRA Technologies has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Schlumberger. TETRA Technologies is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Schlumberger, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Risk and Volatility

TETRA Technologies has a beta of 3.36, suggesting that its stock price is 236% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Schlumberger has a beta of 2.28, suggesting that its stock price is 128% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Summary

Schlumberger beats TETRA Technologies on 8 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

TETRA Technologies vs. Halliburton Stock

TETRA Technologies (NYSE:TTI) and Halliburton (NYSE:HAL) are both oils/energy companies, but which is the better business? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their earnings, risk, institutional ownership, profitability, valuation, analyst recommendations and dividends.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a breakdown of recent ratings for TETRA Technologies and Halliburton, as reported by MarketBeat.

	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
TETRA Technologies	0	2	2	0	2.50
Halliburton	3	11	10	2	2.42

TETRA Technologies currently has a consensus target price of $2.0625, indicating a potential downside of 17.83%. Halliburton has a consensus target price of $16.8190, indicating a potential downside of 26.91%. Given TETRA Technologies' stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe TETRA Technologies is more favorable than Halliburton.

Profitability

This table compares TETRA Technologies and Halliburton's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
TETRA Technologies	-17.78%	-11.74%	-1.24%
Halliburton	-26.60%	11.10%	3.08%

Institutional and Insider Ownership

44.2% of TETRA Technologies shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 75.4% of Halliburton shares are owned by institutional investors. 5.4% of TETRA Technologies shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.5% of Halliburton shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Earnings and Valuation

This table compares TETRA Technologies and Halliburton's top-line revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
TETRA Technologies	$1.04 billion	0.30	$-147,410,000.00	($0.05)	-50.20
Halliburton	$22.41 billion	0.91	$-1,131,000,000.00	$1.24	18.56

TETRA Technologies has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Halliburton. TETRA Technologies is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Halliburton, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Risk and Volatility

TETRA Technologies has a beta of 3.36, suggesting that its stock price is 236% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Halliburton has a beta of 2.81, suggesting that its stock price is 181% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Summary

Halliburton beats TETRA Technologies on 8 of the 15 factors compared between the two stocks.

TETRA Technologies vs. NOV Stock

TETRA Technologies (NYSE:TTI) and NOV (NYSE:NOV) are both oils/energy companies, but which is the better business? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their earnings, risk, institutional ownership, profitability, valuation, analyst recommendations and dividends.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a breakdown of recent ratings for TETRA Technologies and NOV, as reported by MarketBeat.

	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
TETRA Technologies	0	2	2	0	2.50
NOV	2	8	11	0	2.43

TETRA Technologies currently has a consensus target price of $2.0625, indicating a potential downside of 17.83%. NOV has a consensus target price of $13.6059, indicating a potential downside of 13.01%. Given NOV's higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe NOV is more favorable than TETRA Technologies.

Profitability

This table compares TETRA Technologies and NOV's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
TETRA Technologies	-17.78%	-11.74%	-1.24%
NOV	-36.63%	1.13%	0.62%

Institutional and Insider Ownership

44.2% of TETRA Technologies shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 94.5% of NOV shares are owned by institutional investors. 5.4% of TETRA Technologies shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.9% of NOV shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Earnings and Valuation

This table compares TETRA Technologies and NOV's top-line revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
TETRA Technologies	$1.04 billion	0.30	$-147,410,000.00	($0.05)	-50.20
NOV	$8.48 billion	0.72	$-6,095,000,000.00	($0.72)	-21.72

TETRA Technologies has higher earnings, but lower revenue than NOV. TETRA Technologies is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than NOV, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Risk and Volatility

TETRA Technologies has a beta of 3.36, suggesting that its stock price is 236% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, NOV has a beta of 2.22, suggesting that its stock price is 122% more volatile than the S&P 500.

TETRA Technologies vs. TechnipFMC Stock

TETRA Technologies (NYSE:TTI) and TechnipFMC (NYSE:FTI) are both oils/energy companies, but which is the better business? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their earnings, risk, institutional ownership, profitability, valuation, analyst recommendations and dividends.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a breakdown of recent ratings for TETRA Technologies and TechnipFMC, as reported by MarketBeat.

	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
TETRA Technologies	0	2	2	0	2.50
TechnipFMC	0	10	9	0	2.47

TETRA Technologies currently has a consensus target price of $2.0625, indicating a potential downside of 17.83%. TechnipFMC has a consensus target price of $10.0536, indicating a potential upside of 19.40%. Given TechnipFMC's higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe TechnipFMC is more favorable than TETRA Technologies.

Profitability

This table compares TETRA Technologies and TechnipFMC's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
TETRA Technologies	-17.78%	-11.74%	-1.24%
TechnipFMC	-42.41%	1.56%	0.38%

Institutional and Insider Ownership

44.2% of TETRA Technologies shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 77.5% of TechnipFMC shares are owned by institutional investors. 5.4% of TETRA Technologies shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.5% of TechnipFMC shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Earnings and Valuation

This table compares TETRA Technologies and TechnipFMC's top-line revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
TETRA Technologies	$1.04 billion	0.30	$-147,410,000.00	($0.05)	-50.20
TechnipFMC	$13.41 billion	0.28	$-2,415,200,000.00	$0.74	11.38

TETRA Technologies has higher earnings, but lower revenue than TechnipFMC. TETRA Technologies is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than TechnipFMC, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Risk and Volatility

TETRA Technologies has a beta of 3.36, suggesting that its stock price is 236% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, TechnipFMC has a beta of 2.38, suggesting that its stock price is 138% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Summary

TechnipFMC beats TETRA Technologies on 8 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

TETRA Technologies vs. RPC Stock

TETRA Technologies (NYSE:TTI) and RPC (NYSE:RES) are both small-cap oils/energy companies, but which is the better business? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their earnings, risk, institutional ownership, profitability, valuation, analyst recommendations and dividends.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a breakdown of recent ratings for TETRA Technologies and RPC, as reported by MarketBeat.

	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
TETRA Technologies	0	2	2	0	2.50
RPC	2	3	1	0	1.83

TETRA Technologies currently has a consensus target price of $2.0625, indicating a potential downside of 17.83%. RPC has a consensus target price of $3.1786, indicating a potential downside of 50.72%. Given TETRA Technologies' stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe TETRA Technologies is more favorable than RPC.

Profitability

This table compares TETRA Technologies and RPC's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
TETRA Technologies	-17.78%	-11.74%	-1.24%
RPC	-32.86%	-9.35%	-7.44%

Institutional and Insider Ownership

44.2% of TETRA Technologies shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 25.7% of RPC shares are owned by institutional investors. 5.4% of TETRA Technologies shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 73.6% of RPC shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Earnings and Valuation

This table compares TETRA Technologies and RPC's top-line revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
TETRA Technologies	$1.04 billion	0.30	$-147,410,000.00	($0.05)	-50.20
RPC	$1.22 billion	1.13	$-87,110,000.00	($0.12)	-53.75

RPC has higher revenue and earnings than TETRA Technologies. RPC is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than TETRA Technologies, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Risk and Volatility

TETRA Technologies has a beta of 3.36, suggesting that its stock price is 236% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, RPC has a beta of 2.13, suggesting that its stock price is 113% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Summary

TETRA Technologies beats RPC on 9 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

TETRA Technologies vs. Oceaneering International Stock

TETRA Technologies (NYSE:TTI) and Oceaneering International (NYSE:OII) are both small-cap oils/energy companies, but which is the better business? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their earnings, risk, institutional ownership, profitability, valuation, analyst recommendations and dividends.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a breakdown of recent ratings for TETRA Technologies and Oceaneering International, as reported by MarketBeat.

	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
TETRA Technologies	0	2	2	0	2.50
Oceaneering International	0	9	2	0	2.18

TETRA Technologies currently has a consensus target price of $2.0625, indicating a potential downside of 17.83%. Oceaneering International has a consensus target price of $7.9750, indicating a potential downside of 37.84%. Given TETRA Technologies' stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe TETRA Technologies is more favorable than Oceaneering International.

Profitability

This table compares TETRA Technologies and Oceaneering International's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
TETRA Technologies	-17.78%	-11.74%	-1.24%
Oceaneering International	-37.40%	-3.56%	-1.14%

Institutional and Insider Ownership

44.2% of TETRA Technologies shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 83.4% of Oceaneering International shares are owned by institutional investors. 5.4% of TETRA Technologies shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 1.8% of Oceaneering International shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Earnings and Valuation

This table compares TETRA Technologies and Oceaneering International's top-line revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
TETRA Technologies	$1.04 billion	0.30	$-147,410,000.00	($0.05)	-50.20
Oceaneering International	$2.05 billion	0.62	$-348,440,000.00	($0.82)	-15.65

TETRA Technologies has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Oceaneering International. TETRA Technologies is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Oceaneering International, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Risk and Volatility

TETRA Technologies has a beta of 3.36, suggesting that its stock price is 236% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Oceaneering International has a beta of 3.6, suggesting that its stock price is 260% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Summary

Oceaneering International beats TETRA Technologies on 7 of the 13 factors compared between the two stocks.