NASDAQ:DWSN

Dawson Geophysical Competitors

$3.13

-0.23 (-6.85 %)

(As of 02/24/2021 03:48 PM ET)

Add

Compare

Today's Range

$2.87

Now: $3.13▼

$3.34

50-Day Range

$2.50

MA: $2.78▼

$3.25

52-Week Range

$0.84

Now: $3.13▼

$4.47

Volume23,590 shs

Average Volume224,433 shs

Market Capitalization$73.49 million

P/E RatioN/A

Dividend YieldN/A

Beta1.99

Dawson Geophysical (NASDAQ:DWSN) Vs. SLB, HAL, NOV, FTI, DRQ, and RES

Should you be buying DWSN stock or one of its competitors? Companies in the sub-industry of "oil & gas equipment & services" are considered alternatives and competitors to Dawson Geophysical, including Schlumberger (SLB), Halliburton (HAL), NOV (NOV), TechnipFMC (FTI), Dril-Quip (DRQ), and RPC (RES).

Dawson Geophysical vs. Schlumberger Stock

Dawson Geophysical (NASDAQ:DWSN) and Schlumberger (NYSE:SLB) are both oils/energy companies, but which is the better business? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their valuation, dividends, profitability, earnings, analyst recommendations, risk and institutional ownership.

Risk & Volatility

Dawson Geophysical has a beta of 1.99, suggesting that its stock price is 99% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Schlumberger has a beta of 2.28, suggesting that its stock price is 128% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Profitability

This table compares Dawson Geophysical and Schlumberger's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Dawson Geophysical	-10.09%	-10.90%	-9.12%
Schlumberger	-40.15%	7.34%	2.46%

Analyst Ratings

This is a summary of recent ratings and recommmendations for Dawson Geophysical and Schlumberger, as reported by MarketBeat.

	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Dawson Geophysical	0	0	0	0	N/A
Schlumberger	3	6	17	0	2.54

Schlumberger has a consensus price target of $22.9375, suggesting a potential downside of 21.47%. Given Schlumberger's higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Schlumberger is more favorable than Dawson Geophysical.

Earnings and Valuation

This table compares Dawson Geophysical and Schlumberger's top-line revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Dawson Geophysical	$145.77 million	0.50	$-15,210,000.00	N/A	N/A
Schlumberger	$32.92 billion	1.24	$-10,137,000,000.00	$1.47	19.89

Dawson Geophysical has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Schlumberger.

Institutional & Insider Ownership

49.3% of Dawson Geophysical shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 73.2% of Schlumberger shares are owned by institutional investors. 7.2% of Dawson Geophysical shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 0.6% of Schlumberger shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Summary

Schlumberger beats Dawson Geophysical on 9 of the 12 factors compared between the two stocks.

Dawson Geophysical vs. Halliburton Stock

Dawson Geophysical (NASDAQ:DWSN) and Halliburton (NYSE:HAL) are both oils/energy companies, but which is the better business? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their valuation, dividends, profitability, earnings, analyst recommendations, risk and institutional ownership.

Institutional & Insider Ownership

49.3% of Dawson Geophysical shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 75.4% of Halliburton shares are owned by institutional investors. 7.2% of Dawson Geophysical shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 0.5% of Halliburton shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Risk & Volatility

Dawson Geophysical has a beta of 1.99, suggesting that its stock price is 99% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Halliburton has a beta of 2.81, suggesting that its stock price is 181% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Profitability

This table compares Dawson Geophysical and Halliburton's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Dawson Geophysical	-10.09%	-10.90%	-9.12%
Halliburton	-26.60%	11.10%	3.08%

Earnings and Valuation

This table compares Dawson Geophysical and Halliburton's top-line revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Dawson Geophysical	$145.77 million	0.50	$-15,210,000.00	N/A	N/A
Halliburton	$22.41 billion	0.88	$-1,131,000,000.00	$1.24	17.91

Dawson Geophysical has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Halliburton.

Analyst Ratings

This is a summary of recent ratings and recommmendations for Dawson Geophysical and Halliburton, as reported by MarketBeat.

	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Dawson Geophysical	0	0	0	0	N/A
Halliburton	3	11	10	2	2.42

Halliburton has a consensus price target of $16.8190, suggesting a potential downside of 24.61%. Given Halliburton's higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Halliburton is more favorable than Dawson Geophysical.

Summary

Halliburton beats Dawson Geophysical on 10 of the 13 factors compared between the two stocks.

Dawson Geophysical vs. NOV Stock

Dawson Geophysical (NASDAQ:DWSN) and NOV (NYSE:NOV) are both oils/energy companies, but which is the superior business? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their profitability, dividends, analyst recommendations, earnings, risk, valuation and institutional ownership.

Institutional and Insider Ownership

49.3% of Dawson Geophysical shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 94.5% of NOV shares are owned by institutional investors. 7.2% of Dawson Geophysical shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 0.9% of NOV shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Volatility & Risk

Dawson Geophysical has a beta of 1.99, suggesting that its stock price is 99% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, NOV has a beta of 2.22, suggesting that its stock price is 122% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Profitability

This table compares Dawson Geophysical and NOV's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Dawson Geophysical	-10.09%	-10.90%	-9.12%
NOV	-36.63%	1.13%	0.62%

Earnings & Valuation

This table compares Dawson Geophysical and NOV's top-line revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Dawson Geophysical	$145.77 million	0.50	$-15,210,000.00	N/A	N/A
NOV	$8.48 billion	0.73	$-6,095,000,000.00	($0.72)	-22.00

Dawson Geophysical has higher earnings, but lower revenue than NOV.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a summary of recent recommendations for Dawson Geophysical and NOV, as reported by MarketBeat.com.

	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Dawson Geophysical	0	0	0	0	N/A
NOV	2	8	11	0	2.43

NOV has a consensus price target of $13.6059, suggesting a potential downside of 13.89%. Given NOV's higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe NOV is more favorable than Dawson Geophysical.

Summary

NOV beats Dawson Geophysical on 9 of the 12 factors compared between the two stocks.

Dawson Geophysical vs. TechnipFMC Stock

Dawson Geophysical (NASDAQ:DWSN) and TechnipFMC (NYSE:FTI) are both oils/energy companies, but which is the superior business? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their profitability, dividends, analyst recommendations, earnings, risk, valuation and institutional ownership.

Institutional and Insider Ownership

49.3% of Dawson Geophysical shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 77.5% of TechnipFMC shares are owned by institutional investors. 7.2% of Dawson Geophysical shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 0.5% of TechnipFMC shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Volatility & Risk

Dawson Geophysical has a beta of 1.99, suggesting that its stock price is 99% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, TechnipFMC has a beta of 2.38, suggesting that its stock price is 138% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Profitability

This table compares Dawson Geophysical and TechnipFMC's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Dawson Geophysical	-10.09%	-10.90%	-9.12%
TechnipFMC	-42.41%	1.56%	0.38%

Earnings & Valuation

This table compares Dawson Geophysical and TechnipFMC's top-line revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Dawson Geophysical	$145.77 million	0.50	$-15,210,000.00	N/A	N/A
TechnipFMC	$13.41 billion	0.25	$-2,415,200,000.00	$0.74	10.23

Dawson Geophysical has higher earnings, but lower revenue than TechnipFMC.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a summary of recent recommendations for Dawson Geophysical and TechnipFMC, as reported by MarketBeat.com.

	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Dawson Geophysical	0	0	0	0	N/A
TechnipFMC	0	9	10	0	2.53

TechnipFMC has a consensus price target of $10.4179, suggesting a potential upside of 37.80%. Given TechnipFMC's higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe TechnipFMC is more favorable than Dawson Geophysical.

Summary

TechnipFMC beats Dawson Geophysical on 8 of the 12 factors compared between the two stocks.

Dawson Geophysical vs. Dril-Quip Stock

Dawson Geophysical (NASDAQ:DWSN) and Dril-Quip (NYSE:DRQ) are both small-cap oils/energy companies, but which is the superior business? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their profitability, dividends, analyst recommendations, earnings, risk, valuation and institutional ownership.

Institutional and Insider Ownership

49.3% of Dawson Geophysical shares are owned by institutional investors. 7.2% of Dawson Geophysical shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 1.3% of Dril-Quip shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Volatility & Risk

Dawson Geophysical has a beta of 1.99, suggesting that its stock price is 99% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Dril-Quip has a beta of 1.54, suggesting that its stock price is 54% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Profitability

This table compares Dawson Geophysical and Dril-Quip's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Dawson Geophysical	-10.09%	-10.90%	-9.12%
Dril-Quip	-3.14%	0.99%	0.89%

Earnings & Valuation

This table compares Dawson Geophysical and Dril-Quip's top-line revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Dawson Geophysical	$145.77 million	0.50	$-15,210,000.00	N/A	N/A
Dril-Quip	$414.81 million	3.12	$1.72 million	$0.08	460.75

Dril-Quip has higher revenue and earnings than Dawson Geophysical.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a summary of recent recommendations for Dawson Geophysical and Dril-Quip, as reported by MarketBeat.com.

	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Dawson Geophysical	0	0	0	0	N/A
Dril-Quip	0	7	1	0	2.13

Dril-Quip has a consensus price target of $31.4286, suggesting a potential downside of 14.55%. Given Dril-Quip's higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Dril-Quip is more favorable than Dawson Geophysical.

Summary

Dril-Quip beats Dawson Geophysical on 8 of the 12 factors compared between the two stocks.

Dawson Geophysical vs. RPC Stock

Dawson Geophysical (NASDAQ:DWSN) and RPC (NYSE:RES) are both small-cap oils/energy companies, but which is the superior business? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their profitability, dividends, analyst recommendations, earnings, risk, valuation and institutional ownership.

Institutional and Insider Ownership

49.3% of Dawson Geophysical shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 25.7% of RPC shares are owned by institutional investors. 7.2% of Dawson Geophysical shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 73.6% of RPC shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Volatility & Risk

Dawson Geophysical has a beta of 1.99, suggesting that its stock price is 99% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, RPC has a beta of 2.13, suggesting that its stock price is 113% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Profitability

This table compares Dawson Geophysical and RPC's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Dawson Geophysical	-10.09%	-10.90%	-9.12%
RPC	-32.86%	-9.35%	-7.44%

Earnings & Valuation

This table compares Dawson Geophysical and RPC's top-line revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Dawson Geophysical	$145.77 million	0.50	$-15,210,000.00	N/A	N/A
RPC	$1.22 billion	1.04	$-87,110,000.00	($0.12)	-49.17

Dawson Geophysical has higher earnings, but lower revenue than RPC.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a summary of recent recommendations for Dawson Geophysical and RPC, as reported by MarketBeat.com.

	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Dawson Geophysical	0	0	0	0	N/A
RPC	2	3	1	0	1.83

RPC has a consensus price target of $3.1786, suggesting a potential downside of 46.13%. Given RPC's higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe RPC is more favorable than Dawson Geophysical.

Summary

RPC beats Dawson Geophysical on 9 of the 12 factors compared between the two stocks.