S&P 500   3,926.63 (+1.17%)
DOW   31,974.10 (+1.38%)
QQQ   323.57 (+0.65%)
AAPL   125.23 (-0.50%)
MSFT   235.06 (+0.77%)
FB   264.87 (-0.37%)
GOOGL   2,087.47 (+1.33%)
AMZN   3,155.76 (-1.21%)
TSLA   739.93 (+5.88%)
NVDA   579.43 (+2.43%)
BABA   249.90 (-1.13%)
CGC   35.61 (+0.85%)
GE   13.11 (+4.13%)
MU   92.30 (+4.61%)
NIO   51.75 (+5.38%)
AMD   86.83 (+2.47%)
T   29.44 (+0.89%)
F   12.27 (+5.59%)
ACB   11.64 (+3.84%)
DIS   197.46 (+0.19%)
BA   228.49 (+7.72%)
NFLX   553.74 (+1.39%)
BAC   36.35 (+2.34%)
S&P 500   3,926.63 (+1.17%)
DOW   31,974.10 (+1.38%)
QQQ   323.57 (+0.65%)
AAPL   125.23 (-0.50%)
MSFT   235.06 (+0.77%)
FB   264.87 (-0.37%)
GOOGL   2,087.47 (+1.33%)
AMZN   3,155.76 (-1.21%)
TSLA   739.93 (+5.88%)
NVDA   579.43 (+2.43%)
BABA   249.90 (-1.13%)
CGC   35.61 (+0.85%)
GE   13.11 (+4.13%)
MU   92.30 (+4.61%)
NIO   51.75 (+5.38%)
AMD   86.83 (+2.47%)
T   29.44 (+0.89%)
F   12.27 (+5.59%)
ACB   11.64 (+3.84%)
DIS   197.46 (+0.19%)
BA   228.49 (+7.72%)
NFLX   553.74 (+1.39%)
BAC   36.35 (+2.34%)
S&P 500   3,926.63 (+1.17%)
DOW   31,974.10 (+1.38%)
QQQ   323.57 (+0.65%)
AAPL   125.23 (-0.50%)
MSFT   235.06 (+0.77%)
FB   264.87 (-0.37%)
GOOGL   2,087.47 (+1.33%)
AMZN   3,155.76 (-1.21%)
TSLA   739.93 (+5.88%)
NVDA   579.43 (+2.43%)
BABA   249.90 (-1.13%)
CGC   35.61 (+0.85%)
GE   13.11 (+4.13%)
MU   92.30 (+4.61%)
NIO   51.75 (+5.38%)
AMD   86.83 (+2.47%)
T   29.44 (+0.89%)
F   12.27 (+5.59%)
ACB   11.64 (+3.84%)
DIS   197.46 (+0.19%)
BA   228.49 (+7.72%)
NFLX   553.74 (+1.39%)
BAC   36.35 (+2.34%)
S&P 500   3,926.63 (+1.17%)
DOW   31,974.10 (+1.38%)
QQQ   323.57 (+0.65%)
AAPL   125.23 (-0.50%)
MSFT   235.06 (+0.77%)
FB   264.87 (-0.37%)
GOOGL   2,087.47 (+1.33%)
AMZN   3,155.76 (-1.21%)
TSLA   739.93 (+5.88%)
NVDA   579.43 (+2.43%)
BABA   249.90 (-1.13%)
CGC   35.61 (+0.85%)
GE   13.11 (+4.13%)
MU   92.30 (+4.61%)
NIO   51.75 (+5.38%)
AMD   86.83 (+2.47%)
T   29.44 (+0.89%)
F   12.27 (+5.59%)
ACB   11.64 (+3.84%)
DIS   197.46 (+0.19%)
BA   228.49 (+7.72%)
NFLX   553.74 (+1.39%)
BAC   36.35 (+2.34%)
Log in
NASDAQ:DWSN

Dawson Geophysical Competitors

$3.13
-0.23 (-6.85 %)
(As of 02/24/2021 03:48 PM ET)
Add
Compare
Today's Range
$2.87
Now: $3.13
$3.34
50-Day Range
$2.50
MA: $2.78
$3.25
52-Week Range
$0.84
Now: $3.13
$4.47
Volume23,590 shs
Average Volume224,433 shs
Market Capitalization$73.49 million
P/E RatioN/A
Dividend YieldN/A
Beta1.99

Competitors

Dawson Geophysical (NASDAQ:DWSN) Vs. SLB, HAL, NOV, FTI, DRQ, and RES

Should you be buying DWSN stock or one of its competitors? Companies in the sub-industry of "oil & gas equipment & services" are considered alternatives and competitors to Dawson Geophysical, including Schlumberger (SLB), Halliburton (HAL), NOV (NOV), TechnipFMC (FTI), Dril-Quip (DRQ), and RPC (RES).

Dawson Geophysical (NASDAQ:DWSN) and Schlumberger (NYSE:SLB) are both oils/energy companies, but which is the better business? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their valuation, dividends, profitability, earnings, analyst recommendations, risk and institutional ownership.

Risk & Volatility

Dawson Geophysical has a beta of 1.99, suggesting that its stock price is 99% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Schlumberger has a beta of 2.28, suggesting that its stock price is 128% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Profitability

This table compares Dawson Geophysical and Schlumberger's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Net MarginsReturn on EquityReturn on Assets
Dawson Geophysical-10.09%-10.90%-9.12%
Schlumberger-40.15%7.34%2.46%

Analyst Ratings

This is a summary of recent ratings and recommmendations for Dawson Geophysical and Schlumberger, as reported by MarketBeat.

Sell RatingsHold RatingsBuy RatingsStrong Buy RatingsRating Score
Dawson Geophysical0000N/A
Schlumberger361702.54

Schlumberger has a consensus price target of $22.9375, suggesting a potential downside of 21.47%. Given Schlumberger's higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Schlumberger is more favorable than Dawson Geophysical.

Earnings and Valuation

This table compares Dawson Geophysical and Schlumberger's top-line revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

Gross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Dawson Geophysical$145.77 million0.50$-15,210,000.00N/AN/A
Schlumberger$32.92 billion1.24$-10,137,000,000.00$1.4719.89

Dawson Geophysical has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Schlumberger.

Institutional & Insider Ownership

49.3% of Dawson Geophysical shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 73.2% of Schlumberger shares are owned by institutional investors. 7.2% of Dawson Geophysical shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 0.6% of Schlumberger shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Summary

Schlumberger beats Dawson Geophysical on 9 of the 12 factors compared between the two stocks.

Dawson Geophysical (NASDAQ:DWSN) and Halliburton (NYSE:HAL) are both oils/energy companies, but which is the better business? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their valuation, dividends, profitability, earnings, analyst recommendations, risk and institutional ownership.

Institutional & Insider Ownership

49.3% of Dawson Geophysical shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 75.4% of Halliburton shares are owned by institutional investors. 7.2% of Dawson Geophysical shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 0.5% of Halliburton shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Risk & Volatility

Dawson Geophysical has a beta of 1.99, suggesting that its stock price is 99% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Halliburton has a beta of 2.81, suggesting that its stock price is 181% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Profitability

This table compares Dawson Geophysical and Halliburton's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Net MarginsReturn on EquityReturn on Assets
Dawson Geophysical-10.09%-10.90%-9.12%
Halliburton-26.60%11.10%3.08%

Earnings and Valuation

This table compares Dawson Geophysical and Halliburton's top-line revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

Gross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Dawson Geophysical$145.77 million0.50$-15,210,000.00N/AN/A
Halliburton$22.41 billion0.88$-1,131,000,000.00$1.2417.91

Dawson Geophysical has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Halliburton.

Analyst Ratings

This is a summary of recent ratings and recommmendations for Dawson Geophysical and Halliburton, as reported by MarketBeat.

Sell RatingsHold RatingsBuy RatingsStrong Buy RatingsRating Score
Dawson Geophysical0000N/A
Halliburton3111022.42

Halliburton has a consensus price target of $16.8190, suggesting a potential downside of 24.61%. Given Halliburton's higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Halliburton is more favorable than Dawson Geophysical.

Summary

Halliburton beats Dawson Geophysical on 10 of the 13 factors compared between the two stocks.

Dawson Geophysical (NASDAQ:DWSN) and NOV (NYSE:NOV) are both oils/energy companies, but which is the superior business? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their profitability, dividends, analyst recommendations, earnings, risk, valuation and institutional ownership.

Institutional and Insider Ownership

49.3% of Dawson Geophysical shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 94.5% of NOV shares are owned by institutional investors. 7.2% of Dawson Geophysical shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 0.9% of NOV shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Volatility & Risk

Dawson Geophysical has a beta of 1.99, suggesting that its stock price is 99% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, NOV has a beta of 2.22, suggesting that its stock price is 122% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Profitability

This table compares Dawson Geophysical and NOV's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Net MarginsReturn on EquityReturn on Assets
Dawson Geophysical-10.09%-10.90%-9.12%
NOV-36.63%1.13%0.62%

Earnings & Valuation

This table compares Dawson Geophysical and NOV's top-line revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

Gross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Dawson Geophysical$145.77 million0.50$-15,210,000.00N/AN/A
NOV$8.48 billion0.73$-6,095,000,000.00($0.72)-22.00

Dawson Geophysical has higher earnings, but lower revenue than NOV.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a summary of recent recommendations for Dawson Geophysical and NOV, as reported by MarketBeat.com.

Sell RatingsHold RatingsBuy RatingsStrong Buy RatingsRating Score
Dawson Geophysical0000N/A
NOV281102.43

NOV has a consensus price target of $13.6059, suggesting a potential downside of 13.89%. Given NOV's higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe NOV is more favorable than Dawson Geophysical.

Summary

NOV beats Dawson Geophysical on 9 of the 12 factors compared between the two stocks.

Dawson Geophysical (NASDAQ:DWSN) and TechnipFMC (NYSE:FTI) are both oils/energy companies, but which is the superior business? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their profitability, dividends, analyst recommendations, earnings, risk, valuation and institutional ownership.

Institutional and Insider Ownership

49.3% of Dawson Geophysical shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 77.5% of TechnipFMC shares are owned by institutional investors. 7.2% of Dawson Geophysical shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 0.5% of TechnipFMC shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Volatility & Risk

Dawson Geophysical has a beta of 1.99, suggesting that its stock price is 99% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, TechnipFMC has a beta of 2.38, suggesting that its stock price is 138% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Profitability

This table compares Dawson Geophysical and TechnipFMC's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Net MarginsReturn on EquityReturn on Assets
Dawson Geophysical-10.09%-10.90%-9.12%
TechnipFMC-42.41%1.56%0.38%

Earnings & Valuation

This table compares Dawson Geophysical and TechnipFMC's top-line revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

Gross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Dawson Geophysical$145.77 million0.50$-15,210,000.00N/AN/A
TechnipFMC$13.41 billion0.25$-2,415,200,000.00$0.7410.23

Dawson Geophysical has higher earnings, but lower revenue than TechnipFMC.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a summary of recent recommendations for Dawson Geophysical and TechnipFMC, as reported by MarketBeat.com.

Sell RatingsHold RatingsBuy RatingsStrong Buy RatingsRating Score
Dawson Geophysical0000N/A
TechnipFMC091002.53

TechnipFMC has a consensus price target of $10.4179, suggesting a potential upside of 37.80%. Given TechnipFMC's higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe TechnipFMC is more favorable than Dawson Geophysical.

Summary

TechnipFMC beats Dawson Geophysical on 8 of the 12 factors compared between the two stocks.

Dawson Geophysical (NASDAQ:DWSN) and Dril-Quip (NYSE:DRQ) are both small-cap oils/energy companies, but which is the superior business? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their profitability, dividends, analyst recommendations, earnings, risk, valuation and institutional ownership.

Institutional and Insider Ownership

49.3% of Dawson Geophysical shares are owned by institutional investors. 7.2% of Dawson Geophysical shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 1.3% of Dril-Quip shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Volatility & Risk

Dawson Geophysical has a beta of 1.99, suggesting that its stock price is 99% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Dril-Quip has a beta of 1.54, suggesting that its stock price is 54% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Profitability

This table compares Dawson Geophysical and Dril-Quip's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Net MarginsReturn on EquityReturn on Assets
Dawson Geophysical-10.09%-10.90%-9.12%
Dril-Quip-3.14%0.99%0.89%

Earnings & Valuation

This table compares Dawson Geophysical and Dril-Quip's top-line revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

Gross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Dawson Geophysical$145.77 million0.50$-15,210,000.00N/AN/A
Dril-Quip$414.81 million3.12$1.72 million$0.08460.75

Dril-Quip has higher revenue and earnings than Dawson Geophysical.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a summary of recent recommendations for Dawson Geophysical and Dril-Quip, as reported by MarketBeat.com.

Sell RatingsHold RatingsBuy RatingsStrong Buy RatingsRating Score
Dawson Geophysical0000N/A
Dril-Quip07102.13

Dril-Quip has a consensus price target of $31.4286, suggesting a potential downside of 14.55%. Given Dril-Quip's higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Dril-Quip is more favorable than Dawson Geophysical.

Summary

Dril-Quip beats Dawson Geophysical on 8 of the 12 factors compared between the two stocks.

Dawson Geophysical (NASDAQ:DWSN) and RPC (NYSE:RES) are both small-cap oils/energy companies, but which is the superior business? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their profitability, dividends, analyst recommendations, earnings, risk, valuation and institutional ownership.

Institutional and Insider Ownership

49.3% of Dawson Geophysical shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 25.7% of RPC shares are owned by institutional investors. 7.2% of Dawson Geophysical shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 73.6% of RPC shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Volatility & Risk

Dawson Geophysical has a beta of 1.99, suggesting that its stock price is 99% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, RPC has a beta of 2.13, suggesting that its stock price is 113% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Profitability

This table compares Dawson Geophysical and RPC's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Net MarginsReturn on EquityReturn on Assets
Dawson Geophysical-10.09%-10.90%-9.12%
RPC-32.86%-9.35%-7.44%

Earnings & Valuation

This table compares Dawson Geophysical and RPC's top-line revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

Gross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Dawson Geophysical$145.77 million0.50$-15,210,000.00N/AN/A
RPC$1.22 billion1.04$-87,110,000.00($0.12)-49.17

Dawson Geophysical has higher earnings, but lower revenue than RPC.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a summary of recent recommendations for Dawson Geophysical and RPC, as reported by MarketBeat.com.

Sell RatingsHold RatingsBuy RatingsStrong Buy RatingsRating Score
Dawson Geophysical0000N/A
RPC23101.83

RPC has a consensus price target of $3.1786, suggesting a potential downside of 46.13%. Given RPC's higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe RPC is more favorable than Dawson Geophysical.

Summary

RPC beats Dawson Geophysical on 9 of the 12 factors compared between the two stocks.


Dawson Geophysical Competitors List

Competitor NameCompetitor BTM RankCompetitor PriceCompetitor Price ChangeCompetitor Market CapCompetitor RevenueCompetitor P/E RatioCompetitor Indicator(s)
Schlumberger logo
SLB
Schlumberger
2.3$29.24-5.1%$38.62 billion$32.92 billion-3.84
Halliburton logo
HAL
Halliburton
2.2$22.21-5.7%$18.61 billion$22.41 billion-4.47Dividend Announcement
NOV logo
NOV
NOV
1.4$15.84-4.9%$5.85 billion$8.48 billion-2.35
TechnipFMC logo
FTI
TechnipFMC
2.4$7.57-5.7%$3.20 billion$13.41 billion-0.60Analyst Downgrade
Dril-Quip logo
DRQ
Dril-Quip
0.6$36.86-4.6%$1.23 billion$414.81 million-111.69Upcoming Earnings
RPC logo
RES
RPC
1.2$5.90-8.3%$1.16 billion$1.22 billion-5.51
Oceaneering International logo
OII
Oceaneering International
1.1$10.84-6.3%$1.01 billion$2.05 billion-1.46
Seacor logo
CKH
Seacor
1.4$43.00-0.4%$872.13 million$799.97 million82.69Earnings Announcement
News Coverage
Helix Energy Solutions Group logo
HLX
Helix Energy Solutions Group
1.3$4.91-3.1%$714.77 million$751.91 million30.69Earnings Announcement
News Coverage
Tidewater logo
TDW
Tidewater
0.9$13.18-3.6%$514.95 million$486.55 million-2.33Upcoming Earnings
Oil States International logo
OIS
Oil States International
1.2$7.47-4.7%$434.54 million$1.02 billion-0.71Earnings Announcement
Matrix Service logo
MTRX
Matrix Service
1.1$13.99-1.9%$363.72 million$1.10 billion-8.80
Newpark Resources logo
NR
Newpark Resources
1.3$3.46-4.3%$327.80 million$820.12 million-3.93
TETRA Technologies logo
TTI
TETRA Technologies
0.9$2.63-7.6%$306.12 million$1.04 billion-2.25Upcoming Earnings
News Coverage
RigNet logo
RNET
RigNet
0.8$9.94-2.1%$200.05 million$242.93 million-5.43Upcoming Earnings
Geospace Technologies logo
GEOS
Geospace Technologies
0.6$12.21-6.6%$155.05 million$87.83 million-8.54Gap Down
Natural Gas Services Group logo
NGS
Natural Gas Services Group
1.6$10.23-6.8%$128.36 million$78.44 million73.07
Forum Energy Technologies logo
FET
Forum Energy Technologies
0.8$20.00-8.4%$102.15 million$956.50 million-1.47Earnings Announcement
News Coverage
Gap Up
Gulf Island Fabrication logo
GIFI
Gulf Island Fabrication
0.8$4.26-2.1%$65.28 million$303.31 million-1.40Upcoming Earnings
ION Geophysical logo
IO
ION Geophysical
1.1$3.34-6.6%$46.73 million$174.68 million-1.23Gap Down
This page was last updated on 2/24/2021 by MarketBeat.com Staff

Enter your email address below to receive a concise daily summary of analysts' upgrades, downgrades and new coverage with MarketBeat.com's FREE daily email newsletter.