NYSE:NGS

Natural Gas Services Group Competitors

$10.16

-0.24 (-2.31 %)

(As of 03/1/2021 12:00 AM ET)

Add

Compare

Today's Range

$10.00

Now: $10.16▼

$10.76

50-Day Range

$8.07

MA: $9.44▼

$10.40

52-Week Range

$2.62

Now: $10.16▼

$12.23

Volume38,436 shs

Average Volume57,939 shs

Market Capitalization$136.85 million

P/E Ratio72.57

Dividend YieldN/A

Beta2.21

Natural Gas Services Group (NYSE:NGS) Vs. SLB, HAL, NOV, FTI, RES, and OII

Should you be buying NGS stock or one of its competitors? Companies in the sub-industry of "oil & gas equipment & services" are considered alternatives and competitors to Natural Gas Services Group, including Schlumberger (SLB), Halliburton (HAL), NOV (NOV), TechnipFMC (FTI), RPC (RES), and Oceaneering International (OII).

Natural Gas Services Group vs. Schlumberger Stock

Natural Gas Services Group (NYSE:NGS) and Schlumberger (NYSE:SLB) are both oils/energy companies, but which is the superior stock? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their profitability, dividends, institutional ownership, risk, earnings, valuation and analyst recommendations.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a summary of recent recommendations for Natural Gas Services Group and Schlumberger, as provided by MarketBeat.

	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Natural Gas Services Group	0	0	2	0	3.00
Schlumberger	3	6	17	0	2.54

Natural Gas Services Group presently has a consensus price target of $14.00, indicating a potential upside of 37.80%. Schlumberger has a consensus price target of $22.9375, indicating a potential downside of 20.13%. Given Natural Gas Services Group's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, equities research analysts plainly believe Natural Gas Services Group is more favorable than Schlumberger.

Institutional & Insider Ownership

83.0% of Natural Gas Services Group shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 73.2% of Schlumberger shares are held by institutional investors. 7.1% of Natural Gas Services Group shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 0.6% of Schlumberger shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Valuation & Earnings

This table compares Natural Gas Services Group and Schlumberger's gross revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Natural Gas Services Group	$78.44 million	1.74	$-13,860,000.00	N/A	N/A
Schlumberger	$32.92 billion	1.21	$-10,137,000,000.00	$1.47	19.54

Natural Gas Services Group has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Schlumberger.

Volatility and Risk

Natural Gas Services Group has a beta of 2.21, indicating that its stock price is 121% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Schlumberger has a beta of 2.28, indicating that its stock price is 128% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Profitability

This table compares Natural Gas Services Group and Schlumberger's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Natural Gas Services Group	2.79%	-1.04%	-0.87%
Schlumberger	-40.15%	7.34%	2.46%

Summary

Natural Gas Services Group beats Schlumberger on 8 of the 13 factors compared between the two stocks.

Natural Gas Services Group vs. Halliburton Stock

Halliburton (NYSE:HAL) and Natural Gas Services Group (NYSE:NGS) are both oils/energy companies, but which is the better stock? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their dividends, profitability, earnings, valuation, analyst recommendations, risk and institutional ownership.

Analyst Ratings

This is a summary of current recommendations and price targets for Halliburton and Natural Gas Services Group, as reported by MarketBeat.

	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Halliburton	3	11	10	2	2.42
Natural Gas Services Group	0	0	2	0	3.00

Halliburton currently has a consensus target price of $16.8190, suggesting a potential downside of 26.91%. Natural Gas Services Group has a consensus target price of $14.00, suggesting a potential upside of 37.80%. Given Natural Gas Services Group's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Natural Gas Services Group is more favorable than Halliburton.

Volatility & Risk

Halliburton has a beta of 2.81, indicating that its stock price is 181% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Natural Gas Services Group has a beta of 2.21, indicating that its stock price is 121% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Insider and Institutional Ownership

75.4% of Halliburton shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 83.0% of Natural Gas Services Group shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.5% of Halliburton shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 7.1% of Natural Gas Services Group shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Profitability

This table compares Halliburton and Natural Gas Services Group's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Halliburton	-26.60%	11.10%	3.08%
Natural Gas Services Group	2.79%	-1.04%	-0.87%

Valuation and Earnings

This table compares Halliburton and Natural Gas Services Group's top-line revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Halliburton	$22.41 billion	0.91	$-1,131,000,000.00	$1.24	18.56
Natural Gas Services Group	$78.44 million	1.74	$-13,860,000.00	N/A	N/A

Natural Gas Services Group has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Halliburton.

Summary

Natural Gas Services Group beats Halliburton on 8 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

Natural Gas Services Group vs. NOV Stock

Natural Gas Services Group (NYSE:NGS) and NOV (NYSE:NOV) are both oils/energy companies, but which is the better stock? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their profitability, analyst recommendations, valuation, institutional ownership, dividends, earnings and risk.

Analyst Ratings

This is a breakdown of current ratings and target prices for Natural Gas Services Group and NOV, as reported by MarketBeat.com.

	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Natural Gas Services Group	0	0	2	0	3.00
NOV	2	8	11	0	2.43

Natural Gas Services Group currently has a consensus price target of $14.00, indicating a potential upside of 37.80%. NOV has a consensus price target of $13.6059, indicating a potential downside of 13.01%. Given Natural Gas Services Group's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, research analysts clearly believe Natural Gas Services Group is more favorable than NOV.

Institutional & Insider Ownership

83.0% of Natural Gas Services Group shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 94.5% of NOV shares are held by institutional investors. 7.1% of Natural Gas Services Group shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 0.9% of NOV shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Earnings and Valuation

This table compares Natural Gas Services Group and NOV's revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Natural Gas Services Group	$78.44 million	1.74	$-13,860,000.00	N/A	N/A
NOV	$8.48 billion	0.72	$-6,095,000,000.00	($0.72)	-21.72

Natural Gas Services Group has higher earnings, but lower revenue than NOV.

Profitability

This table compares Natural Gas Services Group and NOV's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Natural Gas Services Group	2.79%	-1.04%	-0.87%
NOV	-36.63%	1.13%	0.62%

Risk & Volatility

Natural Gas Services Group has a beta of 2.21, meaning that its share price is 121% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, NOV has a beta of 2.22, meaning that its share price is 122% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Summary

Natural Gas Services Group beats NOV on 7 of the 13 factors compared between the two stocks.

Natural Gas Services Group vs. TechnipFMC Stock

TechnipFMC (NYSE:FTI) and Natural Gas Services Group (NYSE:NGS) are both oils/energy companies, but which is the superior business? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their valuation, dividends, risk, institutional ownership, earnings, profitability and analyst recommendations.

Valuation & Earnings

This table compares TechnipFMC and Natural Gas Services Group's revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
TechnipFMC	$13.41 billion	0.28	$-2,415,200,000.00	$0.74	11.38
Natural Gas Services Group	$78.44 million	1.74	$-13,860,000.00	N/A	N/A

Natural Gas Services Group has lower revenue, but higher earnings than TechnipFMC.

Profitability

This table compares TechnipFMC and Natural Gas Services Group's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
TechnipFMC	-42.41%	1.56%	0.38%
Natural Gas Services Group	2.79%	-1.04%	-0.87%

Analyst Recommendations

This is a breakdown of current recommendations for TechnipFMC and Natural Gas Services Group, as reported by MarketBeat.com.

	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
TechnipFMC	0	10	9	0	2.47
Natural Gas Services Group	0	0	2	0	3.00

TechnipFMC currently has a consensus price target of $10.0536, suggesting a potential upside of 19.40%. Natural Gas Services Group has a consensus price target of $14.00, suggesting a potential upside of 37.80%. Given Natural Gas Services Group's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Natural Gas Services Group is more favorable than TechnipFMC.

Institutional & Insider Ownership

77.5% of TechnipFMC shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 83.0% of Natural Gas Services Group shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.5% of TechnipFMC shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 7.1% of Natural Gas Services Group shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Volatility & Risk

TechnipFMC has a beta of 2.38, suggesting that its share price is 138% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Natural Gas Services Group has a beta of 2.21, suggesting that its share price is 121% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Summary

Natural Gas Services Group beats TechnipFMC on 8 of the 13 factors compared between the two stocks.

Natural Gas Services Group vs. RPC Stock

RPC (NYSE:RES) and Natural Gas Services Group (NYSE:NGS) are both small-cap oils/energy companies, but which is the better stock? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their profitability, earnings, dividends, risk, valuation, institutional ownership and analyst recommendations.

Risk & Volatility

RPC has a beta of 2.13, suggesting that its share price is 113% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Natural Gas Services Group has a beta of 2.21, suggesting that its share price is 121% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Insider and Institutional Ownership

25.7% of RPC shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 83.0% of Natural Gas Services Group shares are held by institutional investors. 73.6% of RPC shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 7.1% of Natural Gas Services Group shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a breakdown of current ratings and price targets for RPC and Natural Gas Services Group, as provided by MarketBeat.com.

	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
RPC	2	3	1	0	1.83
Natural Gas Services Group	0	0	2	0	3.00

RPC presently has a consensus price target of $3.1786, indicating a potential downside of 50.72%. Natural Gas Services Group has a consensus price target of $14.00, indicating a potential upside of 37.80%. Given Natural Gas Services Group's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Natural Gas Services Group is more favorable than RPC.

Profitability

This table compares RPC and Natural Gas Services Group's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
RPC	-32.86%	-9.35%	-7.44%
Natural Gas Services Group	2.79%	-1.04%	-0.87%

Valuation and Earnings

This table compares RPC and Natural Gas Services Group's revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
RPC	$1.22 billion	1.13	$-87,110,000.00	($0.12)	-53.75
Natural Gas Services Group	$78.44 million	1.74	$-13,860,000.00	N/A	N/A

Natural Gas Services Group has lower revenue, but higher earnings than RPC.

Summary

Natural Gas Services Group beats RPC on 11 of the 13 factors compared between the two stocks.

Natural Gas Services Group vs. Oceaneering International Stock

Natural Gas Services Group (NYSE:NGS) and Oceaneering International (NYSE:OII) are both small-cap oils/energy companies, but which is the superior investment? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, dividends, profitability, earnings, institutional ownership, valuation and risk.

Analyst Ratings

This is a summary of recent ratings and price targets for Natural Gas Services Group and Oceaneering International, as provided by MarketBeat.

	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Natural Gas Services Group	0	0	2	0	3.00
Oceaneering International	0	9	2	0	2.18

Natural Gas Services Group currently has a consensus target price of $14.00, suggesting a potential upside of 37.80%. Oceaneering International has a consensus target price of $7.9750, suggesting a potential downside of 37.84%. Given Natural Gas Services Group's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, equities research analysts plainly believe Natural Gas Services Group is more favorable than Oceaneering International.

Valuation and Earnings

This table compares Natural Gas Services Group and Oceaneering International's top-line revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Natural Gas Services Group	$78.44 million	1.74	$-13,860,000.00	N/A	N/A
Oceaneering International	$2.05 billion	0.62	$-348,440,000.00	($0.82)	-15.65

Natural Gas Services Group has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Oceaneering International.

Insider and Institutional Ownership

83.0% of Natural Gas Services Group shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 83.4% of Oceaneering International shares are held by institutional investors. 7.1% of Natural Gas Services Group shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 1.8% of Oceaneering International shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Profitability

This table compares Natural Gas Services Group and Oceaneering International's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Natural Gas Services Group	2.79%	-1.04%	-0.87%
Oceaneering International	-37.40%	-3.56%	-1.14%

Volatility & Risk

Natural Gas Services Group has a beta of 2.21, meaning that its share price is 121% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Oceaneering International has a beta of 3.6, meaning that its share price is 260% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Summary

Natural Gas Services Group beats Oceaneering International on 9 of the 12 factors compared between the two stocks.