Which has stronger earnings & valuation, ET or AROC?

Energy Transfer has higher revenue and earnings than Archrock. Energy Transfer is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Archrock, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks. Company Gross Revenue Price/Sales Ratio Net Income Earnings Per Share Price/Earnings Ratio Energy Transfer $107.38B 0.69 $4.18B $1.47 14.64 Archrock $1.49B 3.80 $322.29M $1.86 17.37

Does the media prefer ET or AROC?

In the previous week, Energy Transfer had 5 more articles in the media than Archrock. MarketBeat recorded 15 mentions for Energy Transfer and 10 mentions for Archrock. Energy Transfer's average media sentiment score of 1.20 beat Archrock's score of 1.16 indicating that Energy Transfer is being referred to more favorably in the media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment Energy Transfer 11 Very Positive mention(s) 3 Positive mention(s) 1 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive Archrock 9 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 0 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive

Does the media favor ENB or ET?

In the previous week, Enbridge had 23 more articles in the media than Energy Transfer. MarketBeat recorded 38 mentions for Enbridge and 15 mentions for Energy Transfer. Energy Transfer's average media sentiment score of 1.20 beat Enbridge's score of 0.60 indicating that Energy Transfer is being referred to more favorably in the news media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment Enbridge 25 Very Positive mention(s) 3 Positive mention(s) 4 Neutral mention(s) 3 Negative mention(s) 2 Very Negative mention(s) Positive Energy Transfer 11 Very Positive mention(s) 3 Positive mention(s) 1 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive

Does the media refer more to ET or EPD?

In the previous week, Enterprise Products Partners had 8 more articles in the media than Energy Transfer. MarketBeat recorded 23 mentions for Enterprise Products Partners and 15 mentions for Energy Transfer. Energy Transfer's average media sentiment score of 1.20 beat Enterprise Products Partners' score of 1.18 indicating that Energy Transfer is being referred to more favorably in the media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment Energy Transfer 11 Very Positive mention(s) 3 Positive mention(s) 1 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive Enterprise Products Partners 15 Very Positive mention(s) 3 Positive mention(s) 3 Neutral mention(s) 2 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive

Does the media favor ET or KMI?

In the previous week, Kinder Morgan had 2 more articles in the media than Energy Transfer. MarketBeat recorded 17 mentions for Kinder Morgan and 15 mentions for Energy Transfer. Kinder Morgan's average media sentiment score of 1.50 beat Energy Transfer's score of 1.20 indicating that Kinder Morgan is being referred to more favorably in the news media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment Energy Transfer 11 Very Positive mention(s) 3 Positive mention(s) 1 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive Kinder Morgan 16 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 1 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Very Positive

Which has stronger valuation and earnings, ET or MPLX?

Mplx has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Energy Transfer. Mplx is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Energy Transfer, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks. Company Gross Revenue Price/Sales Ratio Net Income Earnings Per Share Price/Earnings Ratio Energy Transfer $107.38B 0.69 $4.18B $1.47 14.64 Mplx $11.69B 5.12 $4.91B $4.65 12.70

Is ET or MPLX more profitable?

Mplx has a net margin of 35.75% compared to Energy Transfer's net margin of 4.87%. Mplx's return on equity of 32.83% beat Energy Transfer's return on equity. Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets Energy Transfer 4.87% 11.55% 3.69% Mplx 35.75% 32.83% 10.98%

Does the media refer more to ET or MPLX?

In the previous week, Energy Transfer had 7 more articles in the media than Mplx. MarketBeat recorded 15 mentions for Energy Transfer and 8 mentions for Mplx. Energy Transfer's average media sentiment score of 1.20 beat Mplx's score of 0.93 indicating that Energy Transfer is being referred to more favorably in the media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment Energy Transfer 11 Very Positive mention(s) 3 Positive mention(s) 1 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive Mplx 5 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 3 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive

Energy Transfer (ET) Competitors

$21.52 +0.10 (+0.48%)

Closing price 09/2/2026 03:59 PM Eastern

Extended Trading

$21.56 +0.03 (+0.15%)

As of 08:44 AM Eastern

Compare

ET vs. AROC, ENB, EPD, KMI, and MPLX

Should you buy Energy Transfer stock or one of its competitors? Energy Transfer's main competitors and comparable companies include Archrock (AROC), Enbridge (ENB), Enterprise Products Partners (EPD), Kinder Morgan (KMI), and Mplx (MPLX). Companies are selected based on similarities in market, industry, and size. These companies are all part of the "energy" sector.

How does Energy Transfer compare to Archrock?

Energy Transfer (NYSE:ET) and Archrock (NYSE:AROC) are both energy companies, but which is the better business? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their institutional ownership, valuation, analyst recommendations, profitability, media sentiment, dividends, earnings and risk.

Archrock has a net margin of 21.84% compared to Energy Transfer's net margin of 4.87%. Archrock's return on equity of 22.22% beat Energy Transfer's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Energy Transfer	4.87%	11.55%	3.69%
Archrock	21.84%	22.22%	7.56%

Energy Transfer has higher revenue and earnings than Archrock. Energy Transfer is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Archrock, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Energy Transfer	$107.38B	0.69	$4.18B	$1.47	14.64
Archrock	$1.49B	3.80	$322.29M	$1.86	17.37

Energy Transfer pays an annual dividend of $1.36 per share and has a dividend yield of 6.3%. Archrock pays an annual dividend of $0.92 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.8%. Energy Transfer pays out 92.5% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Archrock pays out 49.5% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Energy Transfer has raised its dividend for 4 consecutive years and Archrock has raised its dividend for 3 consecutive years. Energy Transfer is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

In the previous week, Energy Transfer had 5 more articles in the media than Archrock. MarketBeat recorded 15 mentions for Energy Transfer and 10 mentions for Archrock. Energy Transfer's average media sentiment score of 1.20 beat Archrock's score of 1.16 indicating that Energy Transfer is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Energy Transfer	11 Very Positive mention(s)	3 Positive mention(s)	1 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive
Archrock	9 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	0 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive

Energy Transfer has a beta of 0.57, suggesting that its share price is 43% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Archrock has a beta of 0.86, suggesting that its share price is 14% less volatile than the broader market.

38.2% of Energy Transfer shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 95.5% of Archrock shares are held by institutional investors. 3.3% of Energy Transfer shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 2.9% of Archrock shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Energy Transfer presently has a consensus price target of $24.08, suggesting a potential upside of 11.90%. Archrock has a consensus price target of $42.29, suggesting a potential upside of 30.85%. Given Archrock's higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Archrock is more favorable than Energy Transfer.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Energy Transfer	0 Sell rating(s)	2 Hold rating(s)	12 Buy rating(s)	1 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.93
Archrock	1 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	9 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.80

Summary

Energy Transfer and Archrock tied by winning 10 of the 20 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Energy Transfer compare to Enbridge?

Enbridge (NYSE:ENB) and Energy Transfer (NYSE:ET) are both large-cap energy companies, but which is the superior stock? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their earnings, media sentiment, risk, institutional ownership, profitability, analyst recommendations, valuation and dividends.

In the previous week, Enbridge had 23 more articles in the media than Energy Transfer. MarketBeat recorded 38 mentions for Enbridge and 15 mentions for Energy Transfer. Energy Transfer's average media sentiment score of 1.20 beat Enbridge's score of 0.60 indicating that Energy Transfer is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Enbridge	25 Very Positive mention(s)	3 Positive mention(s)	4 Neutral mention(s)	3 Negative mention(s)	2 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive
Energy Transfer	11 Very Positive mention(s)	3 Positive mention(s)	1 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive

Enbridge has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Energy Transfer. Energy Transfer is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Enbridge, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Enbridge	$83.49B	1.32	$5.36B	$1.87	26.92
Energy Transfer	$107.38B	0.69	$4.18B	$1.47	14.64

Enbridge currently has a consensus price target of $67.00, suggesting a potential upside of 33.07%. Energy Transfer has a consensus price target of $24.08, suggesting a potential upside of 11.90%. Given Enbridge's higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Enbridge is more favorable than Energy Transfer.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Enbridge	0 Sell rating(s)	6 Hold rating(s)	6 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.50
Energy Transfer	0 Sell rating(s)	2 Hold rating(s)	12 Buy rating(s)	1 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.93

Enbridge has a beta of 0.57, indicating that its share price is 43% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Energy Transfer has a beta of 0.57, indicating that its share price is 43% less volatile than the broader market.

54.6% of Enbridge shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 38.2% of Energy Transfer shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.4% of Enbridge shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 3.3% of Energy Transfer shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Enbridge pays an annual dividend of $2.75 per share and has a dividend yield of 5.5%. Energy Transfer pays an annual dividend of $1.36 per share and has a dividend yield of 6.3%. Enbridge pays out 147.1% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Energy Transfer pays out 92.5% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Enbridge has raised its dividend for 2 consecutive years and Energy Transfer has raised its dividend for 4 consecutive years. Energy Transfer is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

Enbridge has a net margin of 7.20% compared to Energy Transfer's net margin of 4.87%. Energy Transfer's return on equity of 11.55% beat Enbridge's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Enbridge	7.20%	11.17%	3.02%
Energy Transfer	4.87%	11.55%	3.69%

Summary

Energy Transfer beats Enbridge on 11 of the 19 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Energy Transfer compare to Enterprise Products Partners?

Energy Transfer (NYSE:ET) and Enterprise Products Partners (NYSE:EPD) are both large-cap energy companies, but which is the better business? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their valuation, earnings, profitability, dividends, risk, institutional ownership, media sentiment and analyst recommendations.

Enterprise Products Partners has a net margin of 10.79% compared to Energy Transfer's net margin of 4.87%. Enterprise Products Partners' return on equity of 20.67% beat Energy Transfer's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Energy Transfer	4.87%	11.55%	3.69%
Enterprise Products Partners	10.79%	20.67%	7.93%

Energy Transfer has a beta of 0.57, suggesting that its share price is 43% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Enterprise Products Partners has a beta of 0.5, suggesting that its share price is 50% less volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, Enterprise Products Partners had 8 more articles in the media than Energy Transfer. MarketBeat recorded 23 mentions for Enterprise Products Partners and 15 mentions for Energy Transfer. Energy Transfer's average media sentiment score of 1.20 beat Enterprise Products Partners' score of 1.18 indicating that Energy Transfer is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Energy Transfer	11 Very Positive mention(s)	3 Positive mention(s)	1 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive
Enterprise Products Partners	15 Very Positive mention(s)	3 Positive mention(s)	3 Neutral mention(s)	2 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive

38.2% of Energy Transfer shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 26.1% of Enterprise Products Partners shares are held by institutional investors. 3.3% of Energy Transfer shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 32.6% of Enterprise Products Partners shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Enterprise Products Partners has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Energy Transfer. Enterprise Products Partners is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Energy Transfer, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Energy Transfer	$107.38B	0.69	$4.18B	$1.47	14.64
Enterprise Products Partners	$52.60B	1.62	$5.81B	$2.88	13.67

Energy Transfer presently has a consensus price target of $24.08, indicating a potential upside of 11.90%. Enterprise Products Partners has a consensus price target of $40.00, indicating a potential upside of 1.59%. Given Energy Transfer's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Energy Transfer is more favorable than Enterprise Products Partners.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Energy Transfer	0 Sell rating(s)	2 Hold rating(s)	12 Buy rating(s)	1 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.93
Enterprise Products Partners	1 Sell rating(s)	7 Hold rating(s)	7 Buy rating(s)	1 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.50

Energy Transfer pays an annual dividend of $1.36 per share and has a dividend yield of 6.3%. Enterprise Products Partners pays an annual dividend of $2.24 per share and has a dividend yield of 5.7%. Energy Transfer pays out 92.5% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Enterprise Products Partners pays out 77.8% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Energy Transfer has raised its dividend for 4 consecutive years and Enterprise Products Partners has raised its dividend for 28 consecutive years.

Summary

Enterprise Products Partners beats Energy Transfer on 10 of the 19 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Energy Transfer compare to Kinder Morgan?

Energy Transfer (NYSE:ET) and Kinder Morgan (NYSE:KMI) are both large-cap energy companies, but which is the superior stock? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their earnings, risk, analyst recommendations, dividends, valuation, profitability, media sentiment and institutional ownership.

Energy Transfer pays an annual dividend of $1.36 per share and has a dividend yield of 6.3%. Kinder Morgan pays an annual dividend of $1.19 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.7%. Energy Transfer pays out 92.5% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Kinder Morgan pays out 76.3% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Energy Transfer has increased its dividend for 4 consecutive years and Kinder Morgan has increased its dividend for 9 consecutive years.

Energy Transfer has higher revenue and earnings than Kinder Morgan. Energy Transfer is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Kinder Morgan, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Energy Transfer	$107.38B	0.69	$4.18B	$1.47	14.64
Kinder Morgan	$16.94B	4.21	$3.06B	$1.56	20.51

Energy Transfer presently has a consensus price target of $24.08, indicating a potential upside of 11.90%. Kinder Morgan has a consensus price target of $35.50, indicating a potential upside of 10.96%. Given Energy Transfer's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, equities research analysts clearly believe Energy Transfer is more favorable than Kinder Morgan.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Energy Transfer	0 Sell rating(s)	2 Hold rating(s)	12 Buy rating(s)	1 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.93
Kinder Morgan	0 Sell rating(s)	10 Hold rating(s)	8 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.44

Kinder Morgan has a net margin of 19.31% compared to Energy Transfer's net margin of 4.87%. Energy Transfer's return on equity of 11.55% beat Kinder Morgan's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Energy Transfer	4.87%	11.55%	3.69%
Kinder Morgan	19.31%	10.46%	4.65%

In the previous week, Kinder Morgan had 2 more articles in the media than Energy Transfer. MarketBeat recorded 17 mentions for Kinder Morgan and 15 mentions for Energy Transfer. Kinder Morgan's average media sentiment score of 1.50 beat Energy Transfer's score of 1.20 indicating that Kinder Morgan is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Energy Transfer	11 Very Positive mention(s)	3 Positive mention(s)	1 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive
Kinder Morgan	16 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	1 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Very Positive

38.2% of Energy Transfer shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 62.5% of Kinder Morgan shares are owned by institutional investors. 3.3% of Energy Transfer shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 12.7% of Kinder Morgan shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Energy Transfer has a beta of 0.57, meaning that its stock price is 43% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Kinder Morgan has a beta of 0.56, meaning that its stock price is 44% less volatile than the broader market.

Summary

Kinder Morgan beats Energy Transfer on 11 of the 20 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Energy Transfer compare to Mplx?

Energy Transfer (NYSE:ET) and Mplx (NYSE:MPLX) are both large-cap energy companies, but which is the better business? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, profitability, dividends, earnings, valuation, institutional ownership, media sentiment and risk.

Energy Transfer currently has a consensus price target of $24.08, indicating a potential upside of 11.90%. Mplx has a consensus price target of $63.20, indicating a potential upside of 7.06%. Given Energy Transfer's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, research analysts clearly believe Energy Transfer is more favorable than Mplx.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Energy Transfer	0 Sell rating(s)	2 Hold rating(s)	12 Buy rating(s)	1 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.93
Mplx	0 Sell rating(s)	6 Hold rating(s)	7 Buy rating(s)	1 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.64

Mplx has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Energy Transfer. Mplx is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Energy Transfer, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Energy Transfer	$107.38B	0.69	$4.18B	$1.47	14.64
Mplx	$11.69B	5.12	$4.91B	$4.65	12.70

In the previous week, Energy Transfer had 7 more articles in the media than Mplx. MarketBeat recorded 15 mentions for Energy Transfer and 8 mentions for Mplx. Energy Transfer's average media sentiment score of 1.20 beat Mplx's score of 0.93 indicating that Energy Transfer is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Energy Transfer	11 Very Positive mention(s)	3 Positive mention(s)	1 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive
Mplx	5 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	3 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive

Energy Transfer pays an annual dividend of $1.36 per share and has a dividend yield of 6.3%. Mplx pays an annual dividend of $4.30 per share and has a dividend yield of 7.3%. Energy Transfer pays out 92.5% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Mplx pays out 92.5% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Energy Transfer has increased its dividend for 4 consecutive years and Mplx has increased its dividend for 9 consecutive years. Mplx is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

Energy Transfer has a beta of 0.57, meaning that its stock price is 43% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Mplx has a beta of 0.48, meaning that its stock price is 52% less volatile than the broader market.

38.2% of Energy Transfer shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 24.3% of Mplx shares are owned by institutional investors. 3.3% of Energy Transfer shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Mplx has a net margin of 35.75% compared to Energy Transfer's net margin of 4.87%. Mplx's return on equity of 32.83% beat Energy Transfer's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Energy Transfer	4.87%	11.55%	3.69%
Mplx	35.75%	32.83%	10.98%

Summary

Energy Transfer beats Mplx on 10 of the 19 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Energy Transfer News Delivered to You Automatically

Subscribe Now

SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding ET and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of NYSE and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.

ET vs. The Competition

Export

Metric	Energy Transfer	Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels Industry	Energy Sector	NYSE Exchange
Market Cap	$73.76B	$11.61B	$10.15B	$23.37B
Dividend Yield	6.32%	11.21%	11.47%	3.75%
P/E Ratio	14.64	18.77	21.97	29.20
Price / Sales	0.69	593.29	485.79	16.58
Price / Cash	7.46	39.89	36.23	31.92
Price / Book	1.57	3.34	3.14	7.59
Net Income	$4.18B	$5.27B	$4.33B	$1.07B
7 Day Performance	0.67%	1.50%	1.48%	-0.95%
1 Month Performance	6.10%	7.24%	6.79%	0.27%
1 Year Performance	22.42%	37.65%	39.49%	13.54%

Energy Transfer Competitors List

Export

Company	MarketRank	Share Price	Analysts' Price Target	1Y Price Performance	Market Cap	Revenue	P/E Ratio	Employee Count	Indicator(s)
ET Energy Transfer	4.8899 of 5 stars	$21.52 +0.5%	$24.08 +11.9%	+21.6%	$73.76B	$107.38B	14.64	22,311	Positive News
AROC Archrock	4.9655 of 5 stars	$30.84 -3.0%	$42.29 +37.1%	+32.2%	$5.41B	$1.50B	16.58	1,350	Positive News Analyst Downgrade
ENB Enbridge	4.1877 of 5 stars	$50.25 -0.4%	$67.00 +33.3%	+4.3%	$109.73B	$46.66B	26.87	14,800	Analyst Revision
EPD Enterprise Products Partners	3.611 of 5 stars	$38.47 +1.2%	$40.00 +4.0%	+23.0%	$83.14B	$58.47B	13.37	8,000	Positive News
KMI Kinder Morgan	3.6904 of 5 stars	$30.95 -0.1%	$35.50 +14.7%	+19.8%	$68.94B	$16.94B	19.84	11,028	Positive News

Related Companies and Tools

Related Companies

Top 10 Stock Comparisons

This page (NYSE:ET) was last updated on 9/3/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.

From Our Partners

Unlock superior investment research and tools.

Get MarketBeat All Access

In-depth profiles and analysis for 20,000 public companies.
Real-time analyst ratings, insider transactions, earnings data, and more.
Our daily ratings and market update email newsletter.

Sign In
Create Account

Your Email Address:

Your Password:

Forgot your password?

Your Email Address:

Choose a Password:

By creating a free account, you agree to our terms of service. This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

Energy Transfer (ET) Competitors

ET vs. AROC, ENB, EPD, KMI, and MPLX

How does Energy Transfer compare to Archrock?

Summary

How does Energy Transfer compare to Enbridge?

Summary

How does Energy Transfer compare to Enterprise Products Partners?

Summary

How does Energy Transfer compare to Kinder Morgan?

Summary

How does Energy Transfer compare to Mplx?

Summary

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

Media Sentiment Over Time

ET vs. The Competition

Energy Transfer Competitors List

Related Companies and Tools

Best-in-Class Portfolio Monitoring

Stock Ideas and Recommendations

Advanced Stock Screeners and Research Tools

About MarketBeat

MarketBeat Products

Popular Tools

Financial Calendars

Terms & Info

Energy Transfer (ET) Competitors

ET vs. AROC, ENB, EPD, KMI, and MPLX

How does Energy Transfer compare to Archrock?

Is ET or AROC more profitable?

Which has stronger earnings & valuation, ET or AROC?

Is ET or AROC a better dividend stock?

Does the media prefer ET or AROC?

Which has more volatility and risk, ET or AROC?

Do institutionals and insiders hold more shares of ET or AROC?

Do analysts rate ET or AROC?

Summary

How does Energy Transfer compare to Enbridge?

Does the media favor ENB or ET?

Which has stronger earnings & valuation, ENB or ET?

Do analysts recommend ENB or ET?

Which has more risk & volatility, ENB or ET?

Do insiders and institutionals hold more shares of ENB or ET?

Is ENB or ET a better dividend stock?

Is ENB or ET more profitable?

Summary

How does Energy Transfer compare to Enterprise Products Partners?

Is ET or EPD more profitable?

Which has more volatility & risk, ET or EPD?

Does the media refer more to ET or EPD?

Do institutionals & insiders hold more shares of ET or EPD?

Which has stronger earnings & valuation, ET or EPD?

Do analysts rate ET or EPD?

Is ET or EPD a better dividend stock?

Summary

How does Energy Transfer compare to Kinder Morgan?

Is ET or KMI a better dividend stock?

Which has stronger earnings & valuation, ET or KMI?

Do analysts recommend ET or KMI?

Is ET or KMI more profitable?

Does the media favor ET or KMI?

Do insiders and institutionals hold more shares of ET or KMI?

Which has more volatility & risk, ET or KMI?

Summary

How does Energy Transfer compare to Mplx?

Do analysts rate ET or MPLX?

Which has stronger valuation and earnings, ET or MPLX?

Does the media refer more to ET or MPLX?

Is ET or MPLX a better dividend stock?

Which has more risk & volatility, ET or MPLX?

Do insiders and institutionals have more ownership in ET or MPLX?

Is ET or MPLX more profitable?

Summary

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

Media Sentiment Over Time

ET vs. The Competition

Energy Transfer Competitors List

Related Companies and Tools

MarketBeat All Access Features

Best-in-Class Portfolio Monitoring

Stock Ideas and Recommendations

Advanced Stock Screeners and Research Tools