Which has preferable valuation and earnings, AROC or ET?

Energy Transfer has higher revenue and earnings than Archrock. Energy Transfer is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Archrock, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks. Company Gross Revenue Price/Sales Ratio Net Income Earnings Per Share Price/Earnings Ratio Archrock $1.49B 3.93 $322.29M $1.86 17.93 Energy Transfer $85.54B 0.84 $4.18B $1.47 14.13

Does the media favor AROC or ET?

In the previous week, Energy Transfer had 19 more articles in the media than Archrock. MarketBeat recorded 25 mentions for Energy Transfer and 6 mentions for Archrock. Energy Transfer's average media sentiment score of 1.09 beat Archrock's score of -0.31 indicating that Energy Transfer is being referred to more favorably in the news media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment Archrock 2 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 3 Neutral mention(s) 1 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Neutral Energy Transfer 13 Very Positive mention(s) 7 Positive mention(s) 2 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive

Does the media favor ET or ENB?

In the previous week, Energy Transfer had 7 more articles in the media than Enbridge. MarketBeat recorded 25 mentions for Energy Transfer and 18 mentions for Enbridge. Energy Transfer's average media sentiment score of 1.09 beat Enbridge's score of 1.05 indicating that Energy Transfer is being referred to more favorably in the media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment Energy Transfer 13 Very Positive mention(s) 7 Positive mention(s) 2 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive Enbridge 13 Very Positive mention(s) 3 Positive mention(s) 2 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive

Does the media prefer ET or EPD?

In the previous week, Energy Transfer had 10 more articles in the media than Enterprise Products Partners. MarketBeat recorded 25 mentions for Energy Transfer and 15 mentions for Enterprise Products Partners. Energy Transfer's average media sentiment score of 1.09 beat Enterprise Products Partners' score of 1.05 indicating that Energy Transfer is being referred to more favorably in the media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment Energy Transfer 13 Very Positive mention(s) 7 Positive mention(s) 2 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive Enterprise Products Partners 10 Very Positive mention(s) 3 Positive mention(s) 2 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive

Does the media prefer KMI or ET?

In the previous week, Energy Transfer had 8 more articles in the media than Kinder Morgan. MarketBeat recorded 25 mentions for Energy Transfer and 17 mentions for Kinder Morgan. Kinder Morgan's average media sentiment score of 1.34 beat Energy Transfer's score of 1.09 indicating that Kinder Morgan is being referred to more favorably in the media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment Kinder Morgan 14 Very Positive mention(s) 2 Positive mention(s) 1 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive Energy Transfer 13 Very Positive mention(s) 7 Positive mention(s) 2 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive

Which has better valuation and earnings, MPLX or ET?

Mplx has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Energy Transfer. Mplx is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Energy Transfer, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks. Company Gross Revenue Price/Sales Ratio Net Income Earnings Per Share Price/Earnings Ratio Mplx $13.00B 4.60 $4.91B $4.65 12.68 Energy Transfer $85.54B 0.84 $4.18B $1.47 14.13

Is MPLX or ET more profitable?

Mplx has a net margin of 35.75% compared to Energy Transfer's net margin of 4.87%. Mplx's return on equity of 32.83% beat Energy Transfer's return on equity. Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets Mplx 35.75% 32.83% 10.98% Energy Transfer 4.87% 11.55% 3.69%

Does the media refer more to MPLX or ET?

In the previous week, Energy Transfer had 17 more articles in the media than Mplx. MarketBeat recorded 25 mentions for Energy Transfer and 8 mentions for Mplx. Energy Transfer's average media sentiment score of 1.09 beat Mplx's score of 0.31 indicating that Energy Transfer is being referred to more favorably in the news media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment Mplx 2 Very Positive mention(s) 1 Positive mention(s) 3 Neutral mention(s) 2 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Neutral Energy Transfer 13 Very Positive mention(s) 7 Positive mention(s) 2 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive

Energy Transfer (ET) Competitors

$20.77 -0.18 (-0.85%)

Closing price 08/13/2026 03:59 PM Eastern

Extended Trading

$20.78 +0.01 (+0.04%)

As of 07:37 AM Eastern

Compare

ET vs. AROC, ENB, EPD, KMI, and MPLX

Should you buy Energy Transfer stock or one of its competitors? Energy Transfer's main competitors and comparable companies include Archrock (AROC), Enbridge (ENB), Enterprise Products Partners (EPD), Kinder Morgan (KMI), and Mplx (MPLX). Companies are selected based on similarities in market, industry, and size. These companies are all part of the "energy" sector.

How does Energy Transfer compare to Archrock?

Archrock (NYSE:AROC) and Energy Transfer (NYSE:ET) are both energy companies, but which is the better business? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their valuation, earnings, institutional ownership, profitability, dividends, risk, analyst recommendations and media sentiment.

Archrock has a beta of 0.86, indicating that its stock price is 14% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Energy Transfer has a beta of 0.55, indicating that its stock price is 45% less volatile than the broader market.

Archrock has a net margin of 21.84% compared to Energy Transfer's net margin of 4.87%. Archrock's return on equity of 22.22% beat Energy Transfer's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Archrock	21.84%	22.22%	7.56%
Energy Transfer	4.87%	11.55%	3.69%

Archrock pays an annual dividend of $0.92 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.8%. Energy Transfer pays an annual dividend of $1.36 per share and has a dividend yield of 6.5%. Archrock pays out 49.5% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Energy Transfer pays out 92.5% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Archrock has raised its dividend for 3 consecutive years and Energy Transfer has raised its dividend for 4 consecutive years. Energy Transfer is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

In the previous week, Energy Transfer had 19 more articles in the media than Archrock. MarketBeat recorded 25 mentions for Energy Transfer and 6 mentions for Archrock. Energy Transfer's average media sentiment score of 1.09 beat Archrock's score of -0.31 indicating that Energy Transfer is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Archrock	2 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	3 Neutral mention(s)	1 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Neutral
Energy Transfer	13 Very Positive mention(s)	7 Positive mention(s)	2 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive

Energy Transfer has higher revenue and earnings than Archrock. Energy Transfer is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Archrock, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Archrock	$1.49B	3.93	$322.29M	$1.86	17.93
Energy Transfer	$85.54B	0.84	$4.18B	$1.47	14.13

95.5% of Archrock shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 38.2% of Energy Transfer shares are owned by institutional investors. 2.9% of Archrock shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 3.3% of Energy Transfer shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Archrock currently has a consensus price target of $41.29, suggesting a potential upside of 23.78%. Energy Transfer has a consensus price target of $23.92, suggesting a potential upside of 15.14%. Given Archrock's higher possible upside, equities research analysts clearly believe Archrock is more favorable than Energy Transfer.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Archrock	0 Sell rating(s)	1 Hold rating(s)	9 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.90
Energy Transfer	0 Sell rating(s)	2 Hold rating(s)	12 Buy rating(s)	1 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.93

Summary

Archrock and Energy Transfer tied by winning 10 of the 20 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Energy Transfer compare to Enbridge?

Energy Transfer (NYSE:ET) and Enbridge (NYSE:ENB) are both large-cap energy companies, but which is the superior business? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their earnings, analyst recommendations, institutional ownership, media sentiment, dividends, profitability, valuation and risk.

Energy Transfer pays an annual dividend of $1.36 per share and has a dividend yield of 6.5%. Enbridge pays an annual dividend of $2.85 per share and has a dividend yield of 5.6%. Energy Transfer pays out 92.5% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Enbridge pays out 152.4% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Energy Transfer has raised its dividend for 4 consecutive years and Enbridge has raised its dividend for 2 consecutive years. Energy Transfer is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

Enbridge has a net margin of 7.20% compared to Energy Transfer's net margin of 4.87%. Energy Transfer's return on equity of 11.55% beat Enbridge's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Energy Transfer	4.87%	11.55%	3.69%
Enbridge	7.20%	11.17%	3.02%

Energy Transfer currently has a consensus target price of $23.92, indicating a potential upside of 15.14%. Enbridge has a consensus target price of $67.00, indicating a potential upside of 30.62%. Given Enbridge's higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Enbridge is more favorable than Energy Transfer.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Energy Transfer	0 Sell rating(s)	2 Hold rating(s)	12 Buy rating(s)	1 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.93
Enbridge	0 Sell rating(s)	7 Hold rating(s)	4 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.36

In the previous week, Energy Transfer had 7 more articles in the media than Enbridge. MarketBeat recorded 25 mentions for Energy Transfer and 18 mentions for Enbridge. Energy Transfer's average media sentiment score of 1.09 beat Enbridge's score of 1.05 indicating that Energy Transfer is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Energy Transfer	13 Very Positive mention(s)	7 Positive mention(s)	2 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive
Enbridge	13 Very Positive mention(s)	3 Positive mention(s)	2 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive

38.2% of Energy Transfer shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 54.6% of Enbridge shares are owned by institutional investors. 3.3% of Energy Transfer shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.4% of Enbridge shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Energy Transfer has a beta of 0.55, meaning that its stock price is 45% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Enbridge has a beta of 0.58, meaning that its stock price is 42% less volatile than the broader market.

Enbridge has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Energy Transfer. Energy Transfer is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Enbridge, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Energy Transfer	$85.54B	0.84	$4.18B	$1.47	14.13
Enbridge	$46.66B	2.40	$5.36B	$1.87	27.43

Summary

Energy Transfer beats Enbridge on 12 of the 20 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Energy Transfer compare to Enterprise Products Partners?

Energy Transfer (NYSE:ET) and Enterprise Products Partners (NYSE:EPD) are both large-cap energy companies, but which is the better business? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their profitability, analyst recommendations, institutional ownership, risk, earnings, media sentiment, dividends and valuation.

Energy Transfer pays an annual dividend of $1.36 per share and has a dividend yield of 6.5%. Enterprise Products Partners pays an annual dividend of $2.24 per share and has a dividend yield of 5.9%. Energy Transfer pays out 92.5% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Enterprise Products Partners pays out 77.8% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Energy Transfer has increased its dividend for 4 consecutive years and Enterprise Products Partners has increased its dividend for 28 consecutive years.

In the previous week, Energy Transfer had 10 more articles in the media than Enterprise Products Partners. MarketBeat recorded 25 mentions for Energy Transfer and 15 mentions for Enterprise Products Partners. Energy Transfer's average media sentiment score of 1.09 beat Enterprise Products Partners' score of 1.05 indicating that Energy Transfer is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Energy Transfer	13 Very Positive mention(s)	7 Positive mention(s)	2 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive
Enterprise Products Partners	10 Very Positive mention(s)	3 Positive mention(s)	2 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive

Energy Transfer has a beta of 0.55, meaning that its stock price is 45% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Enterprise Products Partners has a beta of 0.49, meaning that its stock price is 51% less volatile than the broader market.

Energy Transfer currently has a consensus target price of $23.92, indicating a potential upside of 15.14%. Enterprise Products Partners has a consensus target price of $39.93, indicating a potential upside of 4.85%. Given Energy Transfer's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, equities analysts plainly believe Energy Transfer is more favorable than Enterprise Products Partners.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Energy Transfer	0 Sell rating(s)	2 Hold rating(s)	12 Buy rating(s)	1 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.93
Enterprise Products Partners	1 Sell rating(s)	7 Hold rating(s)	7 Buy rating(s)	1 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.50

38.2% of Energy Transfer shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 26.1% of Enterprise Products Partners shares are held by institutional investors. 3.3% of Energy Transfer shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 32.6% of Enterprise Products Partners shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Enterprise Products Partners has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Energy Transfer. Enterprise Products Partners is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Energy Transfer, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Energy Transfer	$85.54B	0.84	$4.18B	$1.47	14.13
Enterprise Products Partners	$52.60B	1.56	$5.81B	$2.88	13.22

Enterprise Products Partners has a net margin of 10.79% compared to Energy Transfer's net margin of 4.87%. Enterprise Products Partners' return on equity of 20.80% beat Energy Transfer's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Energy Transfer	4.87%	11.55%	3.69%
Enterprise Products Partners	10.79%	20.80%	8.01%

Summary

Energy Transfer beats Enterprise Products Partners on 10 of the 19 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Energy Transfer compare to Kinder Morgan?

Kinder Morgan (NYSE:KMI) and Energy Transfer (NYSE:ET) are both large-cap energy companies, but which is the superior business? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their media sentiment, analyst recommendations, earnings, risk, profitability, institutional ownership, dividends and valuation.

Energy Transfer has higher revenue and earnings than Kinder Morgan. Energy Transfer is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Kinder Morgan, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Kinder Morgan	$16.94B	4.23	$3.06B	$1.56	20.60
Energy Transfer	$85.54B	0.84	$4.18B	$1.47	14.13

Kinder Morgan presently has a consensus price target of $35.50, indicating a potential upside of 10.45%. Energy Transfer has a consensus price target of $23.92, indicating a potential upside of 15.14%. Given Energy Transfer's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Energy Transfer is more favorable than Kinder Morgan.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Kinder Morgan	0 Sell rating(s)	10 Hold rating(s)	8 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.44
Energy Transfer	0 Sell rating(s)	2 Hold rating(s)	12 Buy rating(s)	1 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.93

62.5% of Kinder Morgan shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 38.2% of Energy Transfer shares are held by institutional investors. 12.7% of Kinder Morgan shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 3.3% of Energy Transfer shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Kinder Morgan has a net margin of 19.31% compared to Energy Transfer's net margin of 4.87%. Energy Transfer's return on equity of 11.55% beat Kinder Morgan's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Kinder Morgan	19.31%	10.46%	4.65%
Energy Transfer	4.87%	11.55%	3.69%

Kinder Morgan pays an annual dividend of $1.19 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.7%. Energy Transfer pays an annual dividend of $1.36 per share and has a dividend yield of 6.5%. Kinder Morgan pays out 76.3% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Energy Transfer pays out 92.5% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Kinder Morgan has raised its dividend for 9 consecutive years and Energy Transfer has raised its dividend for 4 consecutive years.

In the previous week, Energy Transfer had 8 more articles in the media than Kinder Morgan. MarketBeat recorded 25 mentions for Energy Transfer and 17 mentions for Kinder Morgan. Kinder Morgan's average media sentiment score of 1.34 beat Energy Transfer's score of 1.09 indicating that Kinder Morgan is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Kinder Morgan	14 Very Positive mention(s)	2 Positive mention(s)	1 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive
Energy Transfer	13 Very Positive mention(s)	7 Positive mention(s)	2 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive

Kinder Morgan has a beta of 0.54, suggesting that its stock price is 46% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Energy Transfer has a beta of 0.55, suggesting that its stock price is 45% less volatile than the broader market.

Summary

Kinder Morgan and Energy Transfer tied by winning 10 of the 20 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Energy Transfer compare to Mplx?

Mplx (NYSE:MPLX) and Energy Transfer (NYSE:ET) are both large-cap energy companies, but which is the superior stock? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their valuation, institutional ownership, profitability, analyst recommendations, earnings, dividends, risk and media sentiment.

Mplx presently has a consensus price target of $62.80, suggesting a potential upside of 6.54%. Energy Transfer has a consensus price target of $23.92, suggesting a potential upside of 15.14%. Given Energy Transfer's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Energy Transfer is more favorable than Mplx.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Mplx	0 Sell rating(s)	6 Hold rating(s)	7 Buy rating(s)	1 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.64
Energy Transfer	0 Sell rating(s)	2 Hold rating(s)	12 Buy rating(s)	1 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.93

Mplx has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Energy Transfer. Mplx is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Energy Transfer, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Mplx	$13.00B	4.60	$4.91B	$4.65	12.68
Energy Transfer	$85.54B	0.84	$4.18B	$1.47	14.13

Mplx pays an annual dividend of $4.31 per share and has a dividend yield of 7.3%. Energy Transfer pays an annual dividend of $1.36 per share and has a dividend yield of 6.5%. Mplx pays out 92.7% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Energy Transfer pays out 92.5% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Mplx has increased its dividend for 9 consecutive years and Energy Transfer has increased its dividend for 4 consecutive years. Mplx is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

24.3% of Mplx shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 38.2% of Energy Transfer shares are owned by institutional investors. 3.3% of Energy Transfer shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Mplx has a beta of 0.48, suggesting that its share price is 52% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Energy Transfer has a beta of 0.55, suggesting that its share price is 45% less volatile than the broader market.

Mplx has a net margin of 35.75% compared to Energy Transfer's net margin of 4.87%. Mplx's return on equity of 32.83% beat Energy Transfer's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Mplx	35.75%	32.83%	10.98%
Energy Transfer	4.87%	11.55%	3.69%

In the previous week, Energy Transfer had 17 more articles in the media than Mplx. MarketBeat recorded 25 mentions for Energy Transfer and 8 mentions for Mplx. Energy Transfer's average media sentiment score of 1.09 beat Mplx's score of 0.31 indicating that Energy Transfer is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Mplx	2 Very Positive mention(s)	1 Positive mention(s)	3 Neutral mention(s)	2 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Neutral
Energy Transfer	13 Very Positive mention(s)	7 Positive mention(s)	2 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive

Summary

Energy Transfer beats Mplx on 11 of the 19 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Energy Transfer News Delivered to You Automatically

Subscribe Now

SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding ET and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of NYSE and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.

ET vs. The Competition

Export

Metric	Energy Transfer	Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels Industry	Energy Sector	NYSE Exchange
Market Cap	$72.14B	$11.08B	$9.68B	$24.28B
Dividend Yield	6.49%	11.33%	11.58%	3.69%
P/E Ratio	14.13	16.17	19.92	30.23
Price / Sales	0.84	463.51	379.87	20.68
Price / Cash	7.30	39.71	36.08	33.80
Price / Book	1.52	3.14	2.96	6.69
Net Income	$4.18B	$5.27B	$4.32B	$1.06B
7 Day Performance	3.16%	2.40%	2.68%	0.45%
1 Month Performance	3.47%	3.56%	3.54%	3.07%
1 Year Performance	19.59%	34.63%	38.04%	18.36%

Energy Transfer Competitors List

Export

Company	MarketRank	Share Price	Analysts' Price Target	1Y Price Performance	Market Cap	Revenue	P/E Ratio	Employee Count	Indicator(s)
ET Energy Transfer	4.7327 of 5 stars	$20.77 -0.8%	$23.92 +15.1%	+18.8%	$72.14B	$85.54B	14.13	22,311	Positive News Analyst Downgrade
AROC Archrock	4.6373 of 5 stars	$35.01 -2.1%	$41.71 +19.1%	+38.9%	$6.13B	$1.52B	19.02	1,350	Analyst Downgrade
ENB Enbridge	4.2594 of 5 stars	$53.90 -1.0%	$69.00 +28.0%	+7.5%	$117.86B	$46.66B	28.86	14,800	Positive News
EPD Enterprise Products Partners	4.5109 of 5 stars	$37.55 -1.3%	$39.93 +6.3%	+20.0%	$81.27B	$58.47B	13.05	8,000	Positive News Analyst Upgrade
KMI Kinder Morgan	3.9406 of 5 stars	$31.42 -2.4%	$35.50 +13.0%	+19.7%	$69.99B	$16.94B	20.15	11,028	Positive News

Related Companies and Tools

Related Companies

Top 10 Stock Comparisons

This page (NYSE:ET) was last updated on 8/14/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.

From Our Partners

Unlock superior investment research and tools.

Get MarketBeat All Access

In-depth profiles and analysis for 20,000 public companies.
Real-time analyst ratings, insider transactions, earnings data, and more.
Our daily ratings and market update email newsletter.

Sign In
Create Account

Your Email Address:

Your Password:

Forgot your password?

Your Email Address:

Choose a Password:

By creating a free account, you agree to our terms of service. This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

Energy Transfer (ET) Competitors

ET vs. AROC, ENB, EPD, KMI, and MPLX

How does Energy Transfer compare to Archrock?

Summary

How does Energy Transfer compare to Enbridge?

Summary

How does Energy Transfer compare to Enterprise Products Partners?

Summary

How does Energy Transfer compare to Kinder Morgan?

Summary

How does Energy Transfer compare to Mplx?

Summary

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

Media Sentiment Over Time

ET vs. The Competition

Energy Transfer Competitors List

Related Companies and Tools

Best-in-Class Portfolio Monitoring

Stock Ideas and Recommendations

Advanced Stock Screeners and Research Tools

About MarketBeat

MarketBeat Products

Popular Tools

Financial Calendars

Terms & Info

Energy Transfer (ET) Competitors

ET vs. AROC, ENB, EPD, KMI, and MPLX

How does Energy Transfer compare to Archrock?

Which has more risk & volatility, AROC or ET?

Is AROC or ET more profitable?

Is AROC or ET a better dividend stock?

Does the media favor AROC or ET?

Which has preferable valuation and earnings, AROC or ET?

Do institutionals and insiders believe in AROC or ET?

Do analysts recommend AROC or ET?

Summary

How does Energy Transfer compare to Enbridge?

Is ET or ENB a better dividend stock?

Is ET or ENB more profitable?

Do analysts recommend ET or ENB?

Does the media favor ET or ENB?

Do institutionals & insiders believe in ET or ENB?

Which has more risk and volatility, ET or ENB?

Which has preferable earnings & valuation, ET or ENB?

Summary

How does Energy Transfer compare to Enterprise Products Partners?

Is ET or EPD a better dividend stock?

Does the media prefer ET or EPD?

Which has more volatility & risk, ET or EPD?

Do analysts rate ET or EPD?

Do institutionals and insiders believe in ET or EPD?

Which has stronger earnings & valuation, ET or EPD?

Is ET or EPD more profitable?

Summary

How does Energy Transfer compare to Kinder Morgan?

Which has higher earnings & valuation, KMI or ET?

Do analysts recommend KMI or ET?

Do institutionals & insiders have more ownership in KMI or ET?

Is KMI or ET more profitable?

Is KMI or ET a better dividend stock?

Does the media prefer KMI or ET?

Which has more risk & volatility, KMI or ET?

Summary

How does Energy Transfer compare to Mplx?

Do analysts rate MPLX or ET?

Which has better valuation and earnings, MPLX or ET?

Is MPLX or ET a better dividend stock?

Do institutionals & insiders hold more shares of MPLX or ET?

Which has more risk and volatility, MPLX or ET?

Is MPLX or ET more profitable?

Does the media refer more to MPLX or ET?

Summary

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

Media Sentiment Over Time

ET vs. The Competition

Energy Transfer Competitors List

Related Companies and Tools

MarketBeat All Access Features

Best-in-Class Portfolio Monitoring

Stock Ideas and Recommendations

Advanced Stock Screeners and Research Tools