Which has preferable earnings and valuation, AROC or ET?

Energy Transfer has higher revenue and earnings than Archrock. Energy Transfer is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Archrock, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks. Company Gross Revenue Price/Sales Ratio Net Income Earnings Per Share Price/Earnings Ratio Archrock $1.52B 4.18 $322.29M $1.84 19.66 Energy Transfer $85.54B 0.82 $4.18B $1.20 16.98

Does the media refer more to AROC or ET?

In the previous week, Energy Transfer had 19 more articles in the media than Archrock. MarketBeat recorded 30 mentions for Energy Transfer and 11 mentions for Archrock. Energy Transfer's average media sentiment score of 1.27 beat Archrock's score of 1.05 indicating that Energy Transfer is being referred to more favorably in the news media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment Archrock 8 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 2 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive Energy Transfer 24 Very Positive mention(s) 2 Positive mention(s) 4 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive

Does the media prefer ET or ENB?

In the previous week, Energy Transfer had 15 more articles in the media than Enbridge. MarketBeat recorded 30 mentions for Energy Transfer and 15 mentions for Enbridge. Energy Transfer's average media sentiment score of 1.27 beat Enbridge's score of 0.87 indicating that Energy Transfer is being referred to more favorably in the media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment Energy Transfer 24 Very Positive mention(s) 2 Positive mention(s) 4 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive Enbridge 9 Very Positive mention(s) 2 Positive mention(s) 2 Neutral mention(s) 1 Negative mention(s) 1 Very Negative mention(s) Positive

Does the media prefer EPD or ET?

In the previous week, Energy Transfer had 17 more articles in the media than Enterprise Products Partners. MarketBeat recorded 30 mentions for Energy Transfer and 13 mentions for Enterprise Products Partners. Energy Transfer's average media sentiment score of 1.27 beat Enterprise Products Partners' score of 0.81 indicating that Energy Transfer is being referred to more favorably in the news media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment Enterprise Products Partners 7 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 5 Neutral mention(s) 1 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive Energy Transfer 24 Very Positive mention(s) 2 Positive mention(s) 4 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive

Does the media favor ET or KMI?

In the previous week, Kinder Morgan had 23 more articles in the media than Energy Transfer. MarketBeat recorded 53 mentions for Kinder Morgan and 30 mentions for Energy Transfer. Energy Transfer's average media sentiment score of 1.27 beat Kinder Morgan's score of 1.25 indicating that Energy Transfer is being referred to more favorably in the media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment Energy Transfer 24 Very Positive mention(s) 2 Positive mention(s) 4 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive Kinder Morgan 35 Very Positive mention(s) 7 Positive mention(s) 7 Neutral mention(s) 1 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive

Which has higher valuation and earnings, MPLX or ET?

Mplx has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Energy Transfer. Mplx is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Energy Transfer, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks. Company Gross Revenue Price/Sales Ratio Net Income Earnings Per Share Price/Earnings Ratio Mplx $13.00B 4.59 $4.91B $4.62 12.72 Energy Transfer $85.54B 0.82 $4.18B $1.20 16.98

Is MPLX or ET more profitable?

Mplx has a net margin of 36.38% compared to Energy Transfer's net margin of 4.66%. Mplx's return on equity of 32.74% beat Energy Transfer's return on equity. Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets Mplx 36.38% 32.74% 11.25% Energy Transfer 4.66% 9.77% 3.17%

Does the media refer more to MPLX or ET?

In the previous week, Energy Transfer had 21 more articles in the media than Mplx. MarketBeat recorded 30 mentions for Energy Transfer and 9 mentions for Mplx. Energy Transfer's average media sentiment score of 1.27 beat Mplx's score of 0.80 indicating that Energy Transfer is being referred to more favorably in the news media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment Mplx 7 Very Positive mention(s) 1 Positive mention(s) 1 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive Energy Transfer 24 Very Positive mention(s) 2 Positive mention(s) 4 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive

Energy Transfer (ET) Competitors

$20.38 -0.05 (-0.22%)

Closing price 07/24/2026 03:59 PM Eastern

Extended Trading

$20.38 +0.00 (+0.02%)

As of 07/24/2026 07:34 PM Eastern

Compare

ET vs. AROC, ENB, EPD, KMI, and MPLX

Should you buy Energy Transfer stock or one of its competitors? MarketBeat compares Energy Transfer with other companies and stocks that may be similar based on industry, sector, market capitalization, business model, investor interest, or shared news coverage. Companies and stocks commonly compared with Energy Transfer include Archrock (AROC), Enbridge (ENB), Enterprise Products Partners (EPD), Kinder Morgan (KMI), and Mplx (MPLX). These companies are all part of the "energy" sector.

How does Energy Transfer compare to Archrock?

Archrock (NYSE:AROC) and Energy Transfer (NYSE:ET) are both energy companies, but which is the better investment? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their risk, media sentiment, valuation, dividends, analyst recommendations, earnings, profitability and institutional ownership.

Archrock pays an annual dividend of $0.88 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.4%. Energy Transfer pays an annual dividend of $1.35 per share and has a dividend yield of 6.6%. Archrock pays out 47.8% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Energy Transfer pays out 112.5% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Archrock has increased its dividend for 3 consecutive years and Energy Transfer has increased its dividend for 4 consecutive years. Energy Transfer is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

Archrock has a net margin of 21.45% compared to Energy Transfer's net margin of 4.66%. Archrock's return on equity of 22.89% beat Energy Transfer's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Archrock	21.45%	22.89%	7.61%
Energy Transfer	4.66%	9.77%	3.17%

Archrock presently has a consensus target price of $41.71, indicating a potential upside of 15.33%. Energy Transfer has a consensus target price of $23.50, indicating a potential upside of 15.34%. Given Energy Transfer's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Energy Transfer is more favorable than Archrock.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Archrock	0 Sell rating(s)	1 Hold rating(s)	9 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.90
Energy Transfer	0 Sell rating(s)	1 Hold rating(s)	11 Buy rating(s)	3 Strong Buy rating(s)	3.13

95.4% of Archrock shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 38.2% of Energy Transfer shares are owned by institutional investors. 2.9% of Archrock shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 3.3% of Energy Transfer shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

In the previous week, Energy Transfer had 19 more articles in the media than Archrock. MarketBeat recorded 30 mentions for Energy Transfer and 11 mentions for Archrock. Energy Transfer's average media sentiment score of 1.27 beat Archrock's score of 1.05 indicating that Energy Transfer is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Archrock	8 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	2 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive
Energy Transfer	24 Very Positive mention(s)	2 Positive mention(s)	4 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive

Energy Transfer has higher revenue and earnings than Archrock. Energy Transfer is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Archrock, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Archrock	$1.52B	4.18	$322.29M	$1.84	19.66
Energy Transfer	$85.54B	0.82	$4.18B	$1.20	16.98

Archrock has a beta of 0.84, meaning that its stock price is 16% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Energy Transfer has a beta of 0.55, meaning that its stock price is 45% less volatile than the broader market.

Summary

Energy Transfer beats Archrock on 11 of the 20 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Energy Transfer compare to Enbridge?

Energy Transfer (NYSE:ET) and Enbridge (NYSE:ENB) are both large-cap energy companies, but which is the superior stock? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their media sentiment, institutional ownership, analyst recommendations, profitability, risk, earnings, dividends and valuation.

Energy Transfer presently has a consensus price target of $23.50, indicating a potential upside of 15.34%. Enbridge has a consensus price target of $66.50, indicating a potential upside of 17.01%. Given Enbridge's higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Enbridge is more favorable than Energy Transfer.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Energy Transfer	0 Sell rating(s)	1 Hold rating(s)	11 Buy rating(s)	3 Strong Buy rating(s)	3.13
Enbridge	0 Sell rating(s)	6 Hold rating(s)	6 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.50

Enbridge has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Energy Transfer. Energy Transfer is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Enbridge, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Energy Transfer	$85.54B	0.82	$4.18B	$1.20	16.98
Enbridge	$46.66B	2.66	$5.36B	$2.13	26.68

Enbridge has a net margin of 9.83% compared to Energy Transfer's net margin of 4.66%. Enbridge's return on equity of 11.21% beat Energy Transfer's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Energy Transfer	4.66%	9.77%	3.17%
Enbridge	9.83%	11.21%	3.10%

38.2% of Energy Transfer shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 54.6% of Enbridge shares are owned by institutional investors. 3.3% of Energy Transfer shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 0.4% of Enbridge shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

In the previous week, Energy Transfer had 15 more articles in the media than Enbridge. MarketBeat recorded 30 mentions for Energy Transfer and 15 mentions for Enbridge. Energy Transfer's average media sentiment score of 1.27 beat Enbridge's score of 0.87 indicating that Energy Transfer is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Energy Transfer	24 Very Positive mention(s)	2 Positive mention(s)	4 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive
Enbridge	9 Very Positive mention(s)	2 Positive mention(s)	2 Neutral mention(s)	1 Negative mention(s)	1 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive

Energy Transfer has a beta of 0.55, indicating that its share price is 45% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Enbridge has a beta of 0.58, indicating that its share price is 42% less volatile than the broader market.

Energy Transfer pays an annual dividend of $1.35 per share and has a dividend yield of 6.6%. Enbridge pays an annual dividend of $2.85 per share and has a dividend yield of 5.0%. Energy Transfer pays out 112.5% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Enbridge pays out 133.8% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Energy Transfer has increased its dividend for 4 consecutive years and Enbridge has increased its dividend for 2 consecutive years. Energy Transfer is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

Summary

Energy Transfer beats Enbridge on 11 of the 20 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Energy Transfer compare to Enterprise Products Partners?

Enterprise Products Partners (NYSE:EPD) and Energy Transfer (NYSE:ET) are both large-cap energy companies, but which is the better business? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their institutional ownership, analyst recommendations, valuation, profitability, risk, dividends, media sentiment and earnings.

26.1% of Enterprise Products Partners shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 38.2% of Energy Transfer shares are held by institutional investors. 32.6% of Enterprise Products Partners shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 3.3% of Energy Transfer shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Enterprise Products Partners pays an annual dividend of $2.24 per share and has a dividend yield of 5.8%. Energy Transfer pays an annual dividend of $1.35 per share and has a dividend yield of 6.6%. Enterprise Products Partners pays out 83.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Energy Transfer pays out 112.5% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Enterprise Products Partners has raised its dividend for 28 consecutive years and Energy Transfer has raised its dividend for 4 consecutive years.

In the previous week, Energy Transfer had 17 more articles in the media than Enterprise Products Partners. MarketBeat recorded 30 mentions for Energy Transfer and 13 mentions for Enterprise Products Partners. Energy Transfer's average media sentiment score of 1.27 beat Enterprise Products Partners' score of 0.81 indicating that Energy Transfer is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Enterprise Products Partners	7 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	5 Neutral mention(s)	1 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive
Energy Transfer	24 Very Positive mention(s)	2 Positive mention(s)	4 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive

Enterprise Products Partners currently has a consensus target price of $39.93, indicating a potential upside of 3.16%. Energy Transfer has a consensus target price of $23.50, indicating a potential upside of 15.34%. Given Energy Transfer's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Energy Transfer is more favorable than Enterprise Products Partners.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Enterprise Products Partners	1 Sell rating(s)	7 Hold rating(s)	8 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.44
Energy Transfer	0 Sell rating(s)	1 Hold rating(s)	11 Buy rating(s)	3 Strong Buy rating(s)	3.13

Enterprise Products Partners has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Energy Transfer. Enterprise Products Partners is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Energy Transfer, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Enterprise Products Partners	$51.57B	1.62	$5.81B	$2.70	14.34
Energy Transfer	$85.54B	0.82	$4.18B	$1.20	16.98

Enterprise Products Partners has a beta of 0.49, suggesting that its share price is 51% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Energy Transfer has a beta of 0.55, suggesting that its share price is 45% less volatile than the broader market.

Enterprise Products Partners has a net margin of 11.45% compared to Energy Transfer's net margin of 4.66%. Enterprise Products Partners' return on equity of 19.53% beat Energy Transfer's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Enterprise Products Partners	11.45%	19.53%	7.53%
Energy Transfer	4.66%	9.77%	3.17%

Summary

Energy Transfer beats Enterprise Products Partners on 11 of the 20 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Energy Transfer compare to Kinder Morgan?

Energy Transfer (NYSE:ET) and Kinder Morgan (NYSE:KMI) are both large-cap energy companies, but which is the superior investment? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their valuation, profitability, institutional ownership, media sentiment, earnings, risk, dividends and analyst recommendations.

Energy Transfer has higher revenue and earnings than Kinder Morgan. Energy Transfer is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Kinder Morgan, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Energy Transfer	$85.54B	0.82	$4.18B	$1.20	16.98
Kinder Morgan	$16.94B	4.32	$3.06B	$1.56	21.07

Energy Transfer has a beta of 0.55, meaning that its share price is 45% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Kinder Morgan has a beta of 0.54, meaning that its share price is 46% less volatile than the broader market.

Kinder Morgan has a net margin of 19.31% compared to Energy Transfer's net margin of 4.66%. Kinder Morgan's return on equity of 10.46% beat Energy Transfer's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Energy Transfer	4.66%	9.77%	3.17%
Kinder Morgan	19.31%	10.46%	4.65%

Energy Transfer currently has a consensus target price of $23.50, suggesting a potential upside of 15.34%. Kinder Morgan has a consensus target price of $35.08, suggesting a potential upside of 6.71%. Given Energy Transfer's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, equities analysts clearly believe Energy Transfer is more favorable than Kinder Morgan.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Energy Transfer	0 Sell rating(s)	1 Hold rating(s)	11 Buy rating(s)	3 Strong Buy rating(s)	3.13
Kinder Morgan	0 Sell rating(s)	11 Hold rating(s)	8 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.42

In the previous week, Kinder Morgan had 23 more articles in the media than Energy Transfer. MarketBeat recorded 53 mentions for Kinder Morgan and 30 mentions for Energy Transfer. Energy Transfer's average media sentiment score of 1.27 beat Kinder Morgan's score of 1.25 indicating that Energy Transfer is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Energy Transfer	24 Very Positive mention(s)	2 Positive mention(s)	4 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive
Kinder Morgan	35 Very Positive mention(s)	7 Positive mention(s)	7 Neutral mention(s)	1 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive

38.2% of Energy Transfer shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 62.5% of Kinder Morgan shares are held by institutional investors. 3.3% of Energy Transfer shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 12.7% of Kinder Morgan shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Energy Transfer pays an annual dividend of $1.35 per share and has a dividend yield of 6.6%. Kinder Morgan pays an annual dividend of $1.19 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.6%. Energy Transfer pays out 112.5% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Kinder Morgan pays out 76.3% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Energy Transfer has increased its dividend for 4 consecutive years and Kinder Morgan has increased its dividend for 9 consecutive years.

Summary

Kinder Morgan beats Energy Transfer on 11 of the 20 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Energy Transfer compare to Mplx?

Mplx (NYSE:MPLX) and Energy Transfer (NYSE:ET) are both large-cap energy companies, but which is the better stock? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their risk, media sentiment, dividends, institutional ownership, earnings, analyst recommendations, profitability and valuation.

Mplx has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Energy Transfer. Mplx is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Energy Transfer, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Mplx	$13.00B	4.59	$4.91B	$4.62	12.72
Energy Transfer	$85.54B	0.82	$4.18B	$1.20	16.98

In the previous week, Energy Transfer had 21 more articles in the media than Mplx. MarketBeat recorded 30 mentions for Energy Transfer and 9 mentions for Mplx. Energy Transfer's average media sentiment score of 1.27 beat Mplx's score of 0.80 indicating that Energy Transfer is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Mplx	7 Very Positive mention(s)	1 Positive mention(s)	1 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive
Energy Transfer	24 Very Positive mention(s)	2 Positive mention(s)	4 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive

Mplx pays an annual dividend of $4.31 per share and has a dividend yield of 7.3%. Energy Transfer pays an annual dividend of $1.35 per share and has a dividend yield of 6.6%. Mplx pays out 93.3% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Energy Transfer pays out 112.5% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Mplx has increased its dividend for 9 consecutive years and Energy Transfer has increased its dividend for 4 consecutive years. Mplx is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

Mplx currently has a consensus price target of $61.60, suggesting a potential upside of 4.86%. Energy Transfer has a consensus price target of $23.50, suggesting a potential upside of 15.34%. Given Energy Transfer's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Energy Transfer is more favorable than Mplx.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Mplx	0 Sell rating(s)	5 Hold rating(s)	7 Buy rating(s)	1 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.69
Energy Transfer	0 Sell rating(s)	1 Hold rating(s)	11 Buy rating(s)	3 Strong Buy rating(s)	3.13

24.3% of Mplx shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 38.2% of Energy Transfer shares are held by institutional investors. 3.3% of Energy Transfer shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Mplx has a net margin of 36.38% compared to Energy Transfer's net margin of 4.66%. Mplx's return on equity of 32.74% beat Energy Transfer's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Mplx	36.38%	32.74%	11.25%
Energy Transfer	4.66%	9.77%	3.17%

Mplx has a beta of 0.47, suggesting that its share price is 53% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Energy Transfer has a beta of 0.55, suggesting that its share price is 45% less volatile than the broader market.

Summary

Energy Transfer beats Mplx on 11 of the 20 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Energy Transfer News Delivered to You Automatically

Subscribe Now

SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding ET and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of NYSE and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.

ET vs. The Competition

Export

Metric	Energy Transfer	Oil/Gas Prod Pipeline MLP Industry	Energy Sector	NYSE Exchange
Market Cap	$70.27B	$36.45B	$10.43B	$23.47B
Dividend Yield	6.61%	6.17%	11.37%	4.21%
P/E Ratio	16.98	16.50	19.76	30.72
Price / Sales	0.82	1.66	388.79	85.51
Price / Cash	7.11	8.81	36.99	31.69
Price / Book	1.53	88.01	4.14	4.73
Net Income	$4.18B	$2.21B	$4.25B	$1.07B
7 Day Performance	0.34%	0.04%	1.47%	-0.44%
1 Month Performance	6.37%	4.80%	3.05%	0.73%
1 Year Performance	14.95%	10.68%	29.45%	14.12%

Energy Transfer Competitors List

Export

Company	MarketRank	Share Price	Analysts' Price Target	1Y Price Performance	Market Cap	Revenue	P/E Ratio	Employee Count	Indicator(s)
ET Energy Transfer	4.2477 of 5 stars	$20.38 -0.2%	$23.50 +15.3%	+15.0%	$70.27B	$85.54B	16.98	22,311	Trending News Analyst Forecast
AROC Archrock	4.7695 of 5 stars	$37.42 +0.7%	$41.14 +10.0%	+54.8%	$6.56B	$1.49B	20.34	1,350	News Coverage Positive News Dividend Increase Analyst Forecast
ENB Enbridge	4.1869 of 5 stars	$55.96 -1.3%	$66.50 +18.8%	+24.9%	$122.20B	$46.66B	26.27	14,800	Upcoming Earnings Analyst Forecast
EPD Enterprise Products Partners	4.3641 of 5 stars	$38.77 +1.5%	$40.13 +3.5%	+21.7%	$83.80B	$52.60B	14.36	8,000	Upcoming Earnings Analyst Forecast
KMI Kinder Morgan	3.3312 of 5 stars	$32.72 +1.3%	$34.71 +6.1%	+20.0%	$72.82B	$16.94B	21.97	11,028	Trending News Earnings Report Dividend Announcement Analyst Forecast

Related Companies and Tools

Related Companies

Top 10 Stock Comparisons

This page (NYSE:ET) was last updated on 7/25/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.

From Our Partners

Unlock superior investment research and tools.

Get MarketBeat All Access

In-depth profiles and analysis for 20,000 public companies.
Real-time analyst ratings, insider transactions, earnings data, and more.
Our daily ratings and market update email newsletter.

Sign In
Create Account

Your Email Address:

Your Password:

Forgot your password?

Your Email Address:

Choose a Password:

By creating a free account, you agree to our terms of service. This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

Energy Transfer (ET) Competitors

ET vs. AROC, ENB, EPD, KMI, and MPLX

How does Energy Transfer compare to Archrock?

Summary

How does Energy Transfer compare to Enbridge?

Summary

How does Energy Transfer compare to Enterprise Products Partners?

Summary

How does Energy Transfer compare to Kinder Morgan?

Summary

How does Energy Transfer compare to Mplx?

Summary

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

Media Sentiment Over Time

ET vs. The Competition

Energy Transfer Competitors List

Related Companies and Tools

Best-in-Class Portfolio Monitoring

Stock Ideas and Recommendations

Advanced Stock Screeners and Research Tools

About MarketBeat

MarketBeat Products

Popular Tools

Financial Calendars

Terms & Info

Energy Transfer (ET) Competitors

ET vs. AROC, ENB, EPD, KMI, and MPLX

How does Energy Transfer compare to Archrock?

Is AROC or ET a better dividend stock?

Is AROC or ET more profitable?

Do analysts prefer AROC or ET?

Do institutionals & insiders have more ownership in AROC or ET?

Does the media refer more to AROC or ET?

Which has preferable earnings and valuation, AROC or ET?

Which has more volatility and risk, AROC or ET?

Summary

How does Energy Transfer compare to Enbridge?

Do analysts prefer ET or ENB?

Which has preferable valuation and earnings, ET or ENB?

Is ET or ENB more profitable?

Do institutionals and insiders believe in ET or ENB?

Does the media prefer ET or ENB?

Which has more volatility & risk, ET or ENB?

Is ET or ENB a better dividend stock?

Summary

How does Energy Transfer compare to Enterprise Products Partners?

Do insiders and institutionals hold more shares of EPD or ET?

Is EPD or ET a better dividend stock?

Does the media prefer EPD or ET?

Do analysts prefer EPD or ET?

Which has higher earnings and valuation, EPD or ET?

Which has more risk and volatility, EPD or ET?

Is EPD or ET more profitable?

Summary

How does Energy Transfer compare to Kinder Morgan?

Which has higher earnings and valuation, ET or KMI?

Which has more volatility and risk, ET or KMI?

Is ET or KMI more profitable?

Do analysts prefer ET or KMI?

Does the media favor ET or KMI?

Do insiders & institutionals have more ownership in ET or KMI?

Is ET or KMI a better dividend stock?

Summary

How does Energy Transfer compare to Mplx?

Which has higher valuation and earnings, MPLX or ET?

Does the media refer more to MPLX or ET?

Is MPLX or ET a better dividend stock?

Do analysts rate MPLX or ET?

Do institutionals & insiders have more ownership in MPLX or ET?

Is MPLX or ET more profitable?

Which has more volatility & risk, MPLX or ET?

Summary

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

Media Sentiment Over Time

ET vs. The Competition

Energy Transfer Competitors List

Related Companies and Tools

MarketBeat All Access Features

Best-in-Class Portfolio Monitoring

Stock Ideas and Recommendations

Advanced Stock Screeners and Research Tools