Which has better valuation & earnings, AROC or ET?

Energy Transfer has higher revenue and earnings than Archrock. Energy Transfer is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Archrock, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks. Company Gross Revenue Price/Sales Ratio Net Income Earnings Per Share Price/Earnings Ratio Archrock $1.52B 4.23 $322.29M $1.84 19.88 Energy Transfer $85.54B 0.77 $4.18B $1.20 15.88

Does the media refer more to AROC or ET?

In the previous week, Energy Transfer had 6 more articles in the media than Archrock. MarketBeat recorded 13 mentions for Energy Transfer and 7 mentions for Archrock. Energy Transfer's average media sentiment score of 1.12 beat Archrock's score of 0.54 indicating that Energy Transfer is being referred to more favorably in the news media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment Archrock 2 Very Positive mention(s) 1 Positive mention(s) 4 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive Energy Transfer 10 Very Positive mention(s) 2 Positive mention(s) 0 Neutral mention(s) 1 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive

Does the media refer more to ET or ENB?

In the previous week, Enbridge had 4 more articles in the media than Energy Transfer. MarketBeat recorded 17 mentions for Enbridge and 13 mentions for Energy Transfer. Energy Transfer's average media sentiment score of 1.12 beat Enbridge's score of 0.80 indicating that Energy Transfer is being referred to more favorably in the media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment Energy Transfer 10 Very Positive mention(s) 2 Positive mention(s) 0 Neutral mention(s) 1 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive Enbridge 8 Very Positive mention(s) 2 Positive mention(s) 6 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive

Does the media prefer EPD or ET?

In the previous week, Enterprise Products Partners had 8 more articles in the media than Energy Transfer. MarketBeat recorded 21 mentions for Enterprise Products Partners and 13 mentions for Energy Transfer. Energy Transfer's average media sentiment score of 1.12 beat Enterprise Products Partners' score of 0.72 indicating that Energy Transfer is being referred to more favorably in the news media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment Enterprise Products Partners 9 Very Positive mention(s) 5 Positive mention(s) 4 Neutral mention(s) 1 Negative mention(s) 2 Very Negative mention(s) Positive Energy Transfer 10 Very Positive mention(s) 2 Positive mention(s) 0 Neutral mention(s) 1 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive

Does the media refer more to ET or KMI?

In the previous week, Kinder Morgan had 20 more articles in the media than Energy Transfer. MarketBeat recorded 33 mentions for Kinder Morgan and 13 mentions for Energy Transfer. Kinder Morgan's average media sentiment score of 1.41 beat Energy Transfer's score of 1.12 indicating that Kinder Morgan is being referred to more favorably in the news media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment Energy Transfer 10 Very Positive mention(s) 2 Positive mention(s) 0 Neutral mention(s) 1 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive Kinder Morgan 28 Very Positive mention(s) 5 Positive mention(s) 0 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive

Which has better valuation & earnings, ET or MPLX?

Mplx has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Energy Transfer. Mplx is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Energy Transfer, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks. Company Gross Revenue Price/Sales Ratio Net Income Earnings Per Share Price/Earnings Ratio Energy Transfer $85.54B 0.77 $4.18B $1.20 15.88 Mplx $13.00B 4.42 $4.91B $4.62 12.26

Is ET or MPLX more profitable?

Mplx has a net margin of 36.38% compared to Energy Transfer's net margin of 4.66%. Mplx's return on equity of 32.74% beat Energy Transfer's return on equity. Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets Energy Transfer 4.66% 9.77% 3.17% Mplx 36.38% 32.74% 11.25%

Does the media favor ET or MPLX?

In the previous week, Energy Transfer had 9 more articles in the media than Mplx. MarketBeat recorded 13 mentions for Energy Transfer and 4 mentions for Mplx. Mplx's average media sentiment score of 1.26 beat Energy Transfer's score of 1.12 indicating that Mplx is being referred to more favorably in the news media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment Energy Transfer 10 Very Positive mention(s) 2 Positive mention(s) 0 Neutral mention(s) 1 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive Mplx 4 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 0 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive

Energy Transfer (ET) Competitors

$19.06 +0.30 (+1.60%)

Closing price 06/12/2026 03:59 PM Eastern

Extended Trading

$19.07 +0.00 (+0.02%)

As of 06/12/2026 07:59 PM Eastern

Compare

ET vs. AROC, ENB, EPD, KMI, and MPLX

Should you buy Energy Transfer stock or one of its competitors? MarketBeat compares Energy Transfer with other companies and stocks that may be similar based on industry, sector, market capitalization, business model, investor interest, or shared news coverage. Companies and stocks commonly compared with Energy Transfer include Archrock (AROC), Enbridge (ENB), Enterprise Products Partners (EPD), Kinder Morgan (KMI), and Mplx (MPLX). These companies are all part of the "energy" sector.

How does Energy Transfer compare to Archrock?

Archrock (NYSE:AROC) and Energy Transfer (NYSE:ET) are both energy companies, but which is the superior stock? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their earnings, risk, profitability, dividends, valuation, media sentiment, analyst recommendations and institutional ownership.

Archrock currently has a consensus target price of $41.14, suggesting a potential upside of 12.49%. Energy Transfer has a consensus target price of $23.45, suggesting a potential upside of 23.05%. Given Energy Transfer's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Energy Transfer is more favorable than Archrock.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Archrock	0 Sell rating(s)	1 Hold rating(s)	8 Buy rating(s)	1 Strong Buy rating(s)	3.00
Energy Transfer	0 Sell rating(s)	1 Hold rating(s)	11 Buy rating(s)	2 Strong Buy rating(s)	3.07

95.4% of Archrock shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 38.2% of Energy Transfer shares are held by institutional investors. 2.9% of Archrock shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 3.3% of Energy Transfer shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Archrock has a beta of 0.87, suggesting that its stock price is 13% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Energy Transfer has a beta of 0.55, suggesting that its stock price is 45% less volatile than the broader market.

Energy Transfer has higher revenue and earnings than Archrock. Energy Transfer is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Archrock, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Archrock	$1.52B	4.23	$322.29M	$1.84	19.88
Energy Transfer	$85.54B	0.77	$4.18B	$1.20	15.88

Archrock has a net margin of 21.45% compared to Energy Transfer's net margin of 4.66%. Archrock's return on equity of 22.89% beat Energy Transfer's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Archrock	21.45%	22.89%	7.61%
Energy Transfer	4.66%	9.77%	3.17%

Archrock pays an annual dividend of $0.88 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.4%. Energy Transfer pays an annual dividend of $1.35 per share and has a dividend yield of 7.1%. Archrock pays out 47.8% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Energy Transfer pays out 112.5% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Archrock has increased its dividend for 3 consecutive years and Energy Transfer has increased its dividend for 4 consecutive years. Energy Transfer is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

In the previous week, Energy Transfer had 6 more articles in the media than Archrock. MarketBeat recorded 13 mentions for Energy Transfer and 7 mentions for Archrock. Energy Transfer's average media sentiment score of 1.12 beat Archrock's score of 0.54 indicating that Energy Transfer is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Archrock	2 Very Positive mention(s)	1 Positive mention(s)	4 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive
Energy Transfer	10 Very Positive mention(s)	2 Positive mention(s)	0 Neutral mention(s)	1 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive

Summary

Energy Transfer beats Archrock on 11 of the 20 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Energy Transfer compare to Enbridge?

Energy Transfer (NYSE:ET) and Enbridge (NYSE:ENB) are both large-cap energy companies, but which is the better business? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their earnings, dividends, institutional ownership, profitability, valuation, analyst recommendations, media sentiment and risk.

Energy Transfer has a beta of 0.55, indicating that its stock price is 45% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Enbridge has a beta of 0.58, indicating that its stock price is 42% less volatile than the broader market.

38.2% of Energy Transfer shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 54.6% of Enbridge shares are held by institutional investors. 3.3% of Energy Transfer shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.4% of Enbridge shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Energy Transfer pays an annual dividend of $1.35 per share and has a dividend yield of 7.1%. Enbridge pays an annual dividend of $2.85 per share and has a dividend yield of 5.0%. Energy Transfer pays out 112.5% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Enbridge pays out 133.8% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Energy Transfer has increased its dividend for 4 consecutive years and Enbridge has increased its dividend for 2 consecutive years. Energy Transfer is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

Enbridge has a net margin of 9.83% compared to Energy Transfer's net margin of 4.66%. Enbridge's return on equity of 11.21% beat Energy Transfer's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Energy Transfer	4.66%	9.77%	3.17%
Enbridge	9.83%	11.21%	3.10%

Enbridge has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Energy Transfer. Energy Transfer is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Enbridge, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Energy Transfer	$85.54B	0.77	$4.18B	$1.20	15.88
Enbridge	$46.66B	2.64	$5.36B	$2.13	26.52

Energy Transfer currently has a consensus price target of $23.45, suggesting a potential upside of 23.05%. Enbridge has a consensus price target of $66.50, suggesting a potential upside of 17.73%. Given Energy Transfer's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, equities analysts clearly believe Energy Transfer is more favorable than Enbridge.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Energy Transfer	0 Sell rating(s)	1 Hold rating(s)	11 Buy rating(s)	2 Strong Buy rating(s)	3.07
Enbridge	0 Sell rating(s)	6 Hold rating(s)	7 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.54

In the previous week, Enbridge had 4 more articles in the media than Energy Transfer. MarketBeat recorded 17 mentions for Enbridge and 13 mentions for Energy Transfer. Energy Transfer's average media sentiment score of 1.12 beat Enbridge's score of 0.80 indicating that Energy Transfer is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Energy Transfer	10 Very Positive mention(s)	2 Positive mention(s)	0 Neutral mention(s)	1 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive
Enbridge	8 Very Positive mention(s)	2 Positive mention(s)	6 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive

Summary

Energy Transfer beats Enbridge on 11 of the 20 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Energy Transfer compare to Enterprise Products Partners?

Enterprise Products Partners (NYSE:EPD) and Energy Transfer (NYSE:ET) are both large-cap energy companies, but which is the better investment? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their earnings, institutional ownership, profitability, media sentiment, analyst recommendations, risk, dividends and valuation.

Enterprise Products Partners presently has a consensus target price of $39.67, suggesting a potential upside of 6.39%. Energy Transfer has a consensus target price of $23.45, suggesting a potential upside of 23.05%. Given Energy Transfer's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Energy Transfer is more favorable than Enterprise Products Partners.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Enterprise Products Partners	1 Sell rating(s)	7 Hold rating(s)	9 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.47
Energy Transfer	0 Sell rating(s)	1 Hold rating(s)	11 Buy rating(s)	2 Strong Buy rating(s)	3.07

Enterprise Products Partners has a beta of 0.49, indicating that its stock price is 51% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Energy Transfer has a beta of 0.55, indicating that its stock price is 45% less volatile than the broader market.

Enterprise Products Partners has a net margin of 11.45% compared to Energy Transfer's net margin of 4.66%. Enterprise Products Partners' return on equity of 19.53% beat Energy Transfer's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Enterprise Products Partners	11.45%	19.53%	7.53%
Energy Transfer	4.66%	9.77%	3.17%

Enterprise Products Partners has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Energy Transfer. Enterprise Products Partners is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Energy Transfer, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Enterprise Products Partners	$51.57B	1.56	$5.81B	$2.70	13.81
Energy Transfer	$85.54B	0.77	$4.18B	$1.20	15.88

In the previous week, Enterprise Products Partners had 8 more articles in the media than Energy Transfer. MarketBeat recorded 21 mentions for Enterprise Products Partners and 13 mentions for Energy Transfer. Energy Transfer's average media sentiment score of 1.12 beat Enterprise Products Partners' score of 0.72 indicating that Energy Transfer is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Enterprise Products Partners	9 Very Positive mention(s)	5 Positive mention(s)	4 Neutral mention(s)	1 Negative mention(s)	2 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive
Energy Transfer	10 Very Positive mention(s)	2 Positive mention(s)	0 Neutral mention(s)	1 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive

Enterprise Products Partners pays an annual dividend of $2.20 per share and has a dividend yield of 5.9%. Energy Transfer pays an annual dividend of $1.35 per share and has a dividend yield of 7.1%. Enterprise Products Partners pays out 81.5% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Energy Transfer pays out 112.5% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Enterprise Products Partners has raised its dividend for 28 consecutive years and Energy Transfer has raised its dividend for 4 consecutive years.

26.1% of Enterprise Products Partners shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 38.2% of Energy Transfer shares are owned by institutional investors. 32.6% of Enterprise Products Partners shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 3.3% of Energy Transfer shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Summary

Enterprise Products Partners and Energy Transfer tied by winning 10 of the 20 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Energy Transfer compare to Kinder Morgan?

Energy Transfer (NYSE:ET) and Kinder Morgan (NYSE:KMI) are both large-cap energy companies, but which is the superior investment? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their institutional ownership, risk, media sentiment, analyst recommendations, profitability, earnings, dividends and valuation.

Energy Transfer has a beta of 0.55, indicating that its stock price is 45% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Kinder Morgan has a beta of 0.54, indicating that its stock price is 46% less volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, Kinder Morgan had 20 more articles in the media than Energy Transfer. MarketBeat recorded 33 mentions for Kinder Morgan and 13 mentions for Energy Transfer. Kinder Morgan's average media sentiment score of 1.41 beat Energy Transfer's score of 1.12 indicating that Kinder Morgan is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Energy Transfer	10 Very Positive mention(s)	2 Positive mention(s)	0 Neutral mention(s)	1 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive
Kinder Morgan	28 Very Positive mention(s)	5 Positive mention(s)	0 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive

Energy Transfer pays an annual dividend of $1.35 per share and has a dividend yield of 7.1%. Kinder Morgan pays an annual dividend of $1.19 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.7%. Energy Transfer pays out 112.5% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Kinder Morgan pays out 79.9% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Energy Transfer has increased its dividend for 4 consecutive years and Kinder Morgan has increased its dividend for 9 consecutive years.

Energy Transfer presently has a consensus price target of $23.45, indicating a potential upside of 23.05%. Kinder Morgan has a consensus price target of $34.20, indicating a potential upside of 7.30%. Given Energy Transfer's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, equities analysts plainly believe Energy Transfer is more favorable than Kinder Morgan.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Energy Transfer	0 Sell rating(s)	1 Hold rating(s)	11 Buy rating(s)	2 Strong Buy rating(s)	3.07
Kinder Morgan	0 Sell rating(s)	10 Hold rating(s)	7 Buy rating(s)	2 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.58

38.2% of Energy Transfer shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 62.5% of Kinder Morgan shares are owned by institutional investors. 3.3% of Energy Transfer shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 12.7% of Kinder Morgan shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Kinder Morgan has a net margin of 18.92% compared to Energy Transfer's net margin of 4.66%. Kinder Morgan's return on equity of 9.90% beat Energy Transfer's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Energy Transfer	4.66%	9.77%	3.17%
Kinder Morgan	18.92%	9.90%	4.40%

Energy Transfer has higher revenue and earnings than Kinder Morgan. Energy Transfer is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Kinder Morgan, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Energy Transfer	$85.54B	0.77	$4.18B	$1.20	15.88
Kinder Morgan	$17.52B	4.05	$3.06B	$1.49	21.39

Summary

Kinder Morgan beats Energy Transfer on 12 of the 19 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Energy Transfer compare to Mplx?

Energy Transfer (NYSE:ET) and Mplx (NYSE:MPLX) are both large-cap energy companies, but which is the better investment? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their risk, dividends, earnings, profitability, valuation, analyst recommendations, media sentiment and institutional ownership.

Energy Transfer pays an annual dividend of $1.35 per share and has a dividend yield of 7.1%. Mplx pays an annual dividend of $4.31 per share and has a dividend yield of 7.6%. Energy Transfer pays out 112.5% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Mplx pays out 93.3% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Energy Transfer has increased its dividend for 4 consecutive years and Mplx has increased its dividend for 9 consecutive years. Mplx is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

Mplx has a net margin of 36.38% compared to Energy Transfer's net margin of 4.66%. Mplx's return on equity of 32.74% beat Energy Transfer's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Energy Transfer	4.66%	9.77%	3.17%
Mplx	36.38%	32.74%	11.25%

Energy Transfer currently has a consensus target price of $23.45, suggesting a potential upside of 23.05%. Mplx has a consensus target price of $61.60, suggesting a potential upside of 8.74%. Given Energy Transfer's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, equities analysts clearly believe Energy Transfer is more favorable than Mplx.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Energy Transfer	0 Sell rating(s)	1 Hold rating(s)	11 Buy rating(s)	2 Strong Buy rating(s)	3.07
Mplx	0 Sell rating(s)	5 Hold rating(s)	7 Buy rating(s)	1 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.69

In the previous week, Energy Transfer had 9 more articles in the media than Mplx. MarketBeat recorded 13 mentions for Energy Transfer and 4 mentions for Mplx. Mplx's average media sentiment score of 1.26 beat Energy Transfer's score of 1.12 indicating that Mplx is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Energy Transfer	10 Very Positive mention(s)	2 Positive mention(s)	0 Neutral mention(s)	1 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive
Mplx	4 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	0 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive

38.2% of Energy Transfer shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 24.3% of Mplx shares are owned by institutional investors. 3.3% of Energy Transfer shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Energy Transfer has a beta of 0.55, meaning that its share price is 45% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Mplx has a beta of 0.48, meaning that its share price is 52% less volatile than the broader market.

Mplx has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Energy Transfer. Mplx is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Energy Transfer, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Energy Transfer	$85.54B	0.77	$4.18B	$1.20	15.88
Mplx	$13.00B	4.42	$4.91B	$4.62	12.26

Summary

Energy Transfer and Mplx tied by winning 10 of the 20 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Energy Transfer News Delivered to You Automatically

Subscribe Now

SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding ET and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of NYSE and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.

ET vs. The Competition

Export

Metric	Energy Transfer	Oil/Gas Prod Pipeline MLP Industry	Energy Sector	NYSE Exchange
Market Cap	$65.62B	$34.81B	$10.39B	$23.32B
Dividend Yield	7.08%	6.55%	10.42%	4.07%
P/E Ratio	15.88	15.64	20.33	31.33
Price / Sales	0.77	1.53	762.56	103.72
Price / Cash	6.64	8.02	37.27	24.31
Price / Book	1.43	97.74	4.25	4.68
Net Income	$4.18B	$2.21B	$4.24B	$1.07B
7 Day Performance	-1.93%	0.31%	-0.28%	2.11%
1 Month Performance	-6.44%	-3.22%	-2.86%	1.95%
1 Year Performance	4.19%	10.71%	37.45%	24.11%

Energy Transfer Competitors List

Export

Company	MarketRank	Share Price	Analysts' Price Target	1Y Price Performance	Market Cap	Revenue	P/E Ratio	Employee Count	Indicator(s)
ET Energy Transfer	4.7436 of 5 stars	$19.06 +1.6%	$23.45 +23.0%	+4.2%	$65.62B	$85.54B	15.88	22,311	Positive News
AROC Archrock	4.5384 of 5 stars	$34.93 +2.1%	$41.14 +17.8%	+47.3%	$6.12B	$1.52B	18.98	1,350	News Coverage
ENB Enbridge	4.2121 of 5 stars	$55.43 -1.6%	$66.50 +20.0%	+21.1%	$121.05B	$46.66B	26.03	14,800	News Coverage Analyst Upgrade Short Interest Decrease
EPD Enterprise Products Partners	4.8229 of 5 stars	$37.64 -0.5%	$39.67 +5.4%	+16.5%	$81.36B	$51.57B	13.94	8,000	News Coverage Analyst Upgrade
KMI Kinder Morgan	3.7247 of 5 stars	$31.33 -1.1%	$34.20 +9.2%	+15.5%	$69.69B	$17.52B	21.02	11,028	News Coverage Positive News Analyst Forecast

Related Companies and Tools

Related Companies

Top 10 Stock Comparisons

This page (NYSE:ET) was last updated on 6/14/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.

From Our Partners

Get 30 Days of MarketBeat All Access for Free

Start Your 30-Day Trial

In-depth profiles and analysis for 20,000 public companies.
Real-time analyst ratings, insider transactions, earnings data, and more.
Our daily ratings and market update email newsletter.

Sign In
Create Account

Your Email Address:

Your Password:

Forgot your password?

Your Email Address:

Choose a Password:

By creating a free account, you agree to our terms of service. This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

Energy Transfer (ET) Competitors

ET vs. AROC, ENB, EPD, KMI, and MPLX

How does Energy Transfer compare to Archrock?

Summary

How does Energy Transfer compare to Enbridge?

Summary

How does Energy Transfer compare to Enterprise Products Partners?

Summary

How does Energy Transfer compare to Kinder Morgan?

Summary

How does Energy Transfer compare to Mplx?

Summary

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

Media Sentiment Over Time

ET vs. The Competition

Energy Transfer Competitors List

Related Companies and Tools

Best-in-Class Portfolio Monitoring

Stock Ideas and Recommendations

Advanced Stock Screeners and Research Tools

About MarketBeat

MarketBeat Products

Popular Tools

Financial Calendars

Terms & Info

Energy Transfer (ET) Competitors

ET vs. AROC, ENB, EPD, KMI, and MPLX

How does Energy Transfer compare to Archrock?

Do analysts rate AROC or ET?

Do institutionals and insiders believe in AROC or ET?

Which has more risk and volatility, AROC or ET?

Which has better valuation & earnings, AROC or ET?

Is AROC or ET more profitable?

Is AROC or ET a better dividend stock?

Does the media refer more to AROC or ET?

Summary

How does Energy Transfer compare to Enbridge?

Which has more volatility and risk, ET or ENB?

Do institutionals & insiders hold more shares of ET or ENB?

Is ET or ENB a better dividend stock?

Is ET or ENB more profitable?

Which has better earnings and valuation, ET or ENB?

Do analysts recommend ET or ENB?

Does the media refer more to ET or ENB?

Summary

How does Energy Transfer compare to Enterprise Products Partners?

Do analysts recommend EPD or ET?

Which has more risk & volatility, EPD or ET?

Is EPD or ET more profitable?

Which has stronger valuation & earnings, EPD or ET?

Does the media prefer EPD or ET?

Is EPD or ET a better dividend stock?

Do insiders & institutionals have more ownership in EPD or ET?

Summary

How does Energy Transfer compare to Kinder Morgan?

Which has more volatility and risk, ET or KMI?

Does the media refer more to ET or KMI?

Is ET or KMI a better dividend stock?

Do analysts prefer ET or KMI?

Do insiders and institutionals hold more shares of ET or KMI?

Is ET or KMI more profitable?

Which has better earnings & valuation, ET or KMI?

Summary

How does Energy Transfer compare to Mplx?

Is ET or MPLX a better dividend stock?

Is ET or MPLX more profitable?

Do analysts recommend ET or MPLX?

Does the media favor ET or MPLX?

Do institutionals and insiders hold more shares of ET or MPLX?

Which has more risk & volatility, ET or MPLX?

Which has better valuation & earnings, ET or MPLX?

Summary

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

Media Sentiment Over Time

ET vs. The Competition

Energy Transfer Competitors List

Related Companies and Tools

MarketBeat All Access Features

Best-in-Class Portfolio Monitoring

Stock Ideas and Recommendations

Advanced Stock Screeners and Research Tools