Free Trial
$100 Off Ends Tonight! MarketBeat All Access Returns to $249
  • 0Days
  • 0Hours
  • 0Minutes
  • 0Seconds
Save $100 Now
Claim MarketBeat All Access Sale Promotion

Energy Transfer (ET) Competitors

Energy Transfer logo
$20.09 +0.02 (+0.11%)
Closing price 05/22/2026 03:59 PM Eastern
Extended Trading
$20.08 -0.02 (-0.09%)
As of 05/22/2026 07:59 PM Eastern
Extended trading is trading that happens on electronic markets outside of regular trading hours. This is a fair market value extended hours price provided by Massive. Learn more.

ET vs. AROC, ENB, EPD, KMI, and MPLX

Should you buy Energy Transfer stock or one of its competitors? MarketBeat compares Energy Transfer with other companies and stocks that may be similar based on industry, sector, market capitalization, business model, investor interest, or shared news coverage. Companies and stocks commonly compared with Energy Transfer include Archrock (AROC), Enbridge (ENB), Enterprise Products Partners (EPD), Kinder Morgan (KMI), and Mplx (MPLX). These companies are all part of the "energy" sector.

How does Energy Transfer compare to Archrock?

Archrock (NYSE:AROC) and Energy Transfer (NYSE:ET) are both energy companies, but which is the superior business? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their profitability, media sentiment, dividends, institutional ownership, analyst recommendations, valuation, earnings and risk.

95.5% of Archrock shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 38.2% of Energy Transfer shares are owned by institutional investors. 2.9% of Archrock shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 3.3% of Energy Transfer shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Archrock presently has a consensus target price of $40.86, suggesting a potential upside of 9.67%. Energy Transfer has a consensus target price of $22.73, suggesting a potential upside of 13.11%. Given Energy Transfer's higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Energy Transfer is more favorable than Archrock.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Archrock
0 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
8 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00
Energy Transfer
0 Sell rating(s)
2 Hold rating(s)
10 Buy rating(s)
2 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00

Archrock pays an annual dividend of $0.88 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.4%. Energy Transfer pays an annual dividend of $1.35 per share and has a dividend yield of 6.7%. Archrock pays out 47.8% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Energy Transfer pays out 112.5% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Archrock has increased its dividend for 3 consecutive years and Energy Transfer has increased its dividend for 4 consecutive years. Energy Transfer is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

Energy Transfer has higher revenue and earnings than Archrock. Energy Transfer is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Archrock, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Archrock$1.49B4.38$322.29M$1.8420.25
Energy Transfer$92.29B0.75$4.18B$1.2016.74

In the previous week, Energy Transfer had 9 more articles in the media than Archrock. MarketBeat recorded 19 mentions for Energy Transfer and 10 mentions for Archrock. Energy Transfer's average media sentiment score of 0.90 beat Archrock's score of 0.23 indicating that Energy Transfer is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Archrock
3 Very Positive mention(s)
4 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral
Energy Transfer
11 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
4 Neutral mention(s)
2 Negative mention(s)
1 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

Archrock has a net margin of 21.45% compared to Energy Transfer's net margin of 4.66%. Archrock's return on equity of 22.89% beat Energy Transfer's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Archrock21.45% 22.89% 7.61%
Energy Transfer 4.66%9.77%3.17%

Archrock has a beta of 0.94, suggesting that its stock price is 6% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Energy Transfer has a beta of 0.57, suggesting that its stock price is 43% less volatile than the broader market.

Summary

Energy Transfer beats Archrock on 10 of the 19 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Energy Transfer compare to Enbridge?

Enbridge (NYSE:ENB) and Energy Transfer (NYSE:ET) are both large-cap energy companies, but which is the superior business? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their earnings, dividends, analyst recommendations, media sentiment, profitability, risk, institutional ownership and valuation.

Enbridge has a beta of 0.59, indicating that its stock price is 41% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Energy Transfer has a beta of 0.57, indicating that its stock price is 43% less volatile than the broader market.

Enbridge has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Energy Transfer. Energy Transfer is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Enbridge, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Enbridge$69.05B1.84$5.36B$2.1327.26
Energy Transfer$92.29B0.75$4.18B$1.2016.74

Enbridge pays an annual dividend of $2.85 per share and has a dividend yield of 4.9%. Energy Transfer pays an annual dividend of $1.35 per share and has a dividend yield of 6.7%. Enbridge pays out 133.8% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Energy Transfer pays out 112.5% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Enbridge has raised its dividend for 2 consecutive years and Energy Transfer has raised its dividend for 4 consecutive years. Energy Transfer is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

54.6% of Enbridge shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 38.2% of Energy Transfer shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.4% of Enbridge shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 3.3% of Energy Transfer shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

In the previous week, Energy Transfer had 6 more articles in the media than Enbridge. MarketBeat recorded 19 mentions for Energy Transfer and 13 mentions for Enbridge. Energy Transfer's average media sentiment score of 0.90 beat Enbridge's score of 0.53 indicating that Energy Transfer is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Enbridge
6 Very Positive mention(s)
2 Positive mention(s)
3 Neutral mention(s)
2 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
Energy Transfer
11 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
4 Neutral mention(s)
2 Negative mention(s)
1 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

Enbridge has a net margin of 9.83% compared to Energy Transfer's net margin of 4.66%. Enbridge's return on equity of 11.21% beat Energy Transfer's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Enbridge9.83% 11.21% 3.10%
Energy Transfer 4.66%9.77%3.17%

Enbridge presently has a consensus price target of $66.50, suggesting a potential upside of 14.52%. Energy Transfer has a consensus price target of $22.73, suggesting a potential upside of 13.11%. Given Enbridge's higher probable upside, equities analysts plainly believe Enbridge is more favorable than Energy Transfer.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Enbridge
0 Sell rating(s)
6 Hold rating(s)
7 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.54
Energy Transfer
0 Sell rating(s)
2 Hold rating(s)
10 Buy rating(s)
2 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00

Summary

Energy Transfer beats Enbridge on 11 of the 20 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Energy Transfer compare to Enterprise Products Partners?

Enterprise Products Partners (NYSE:EPD) and Energy Transfer (NYSE:ET) are both large-cap energy companies, but which is the better investment? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, valuation, media sentiment, profitability, risk, dividends, earnings and institutional ownership.

Enterprise Products Partners has a beta of 0.52, suggesting that its stock price is 48% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Energy Transfer has a beta of 0.57, suggesting that its stock price is 43% less volatile than the broader market.

Enterprise Products Partners has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Energy Transfer. Enterprise Products Partners is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Energy Transfer, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Enterprise Products Partners$52.60B1.63$5.81B$2.7014.65
Energy Transfer$92.29B0.75$4.18B$1.2016.74

Enterprise Products Partners pays an annual dividend of $2.20 per share and has a dividend yield of 5.6%. Energy Transfer pays an annual dividend of $1.35 per share and has a dividend yield of 6.7%. Enterprise Products Partners pays out 81.5% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Energy Transfer pays out 112.5% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Enterprise Products Partners has increased its dividend for 28 consecutive years and Energy Transfer has increased its dividend for 4 consecutive years.

26.1% of Enterprise Products Partners shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 38.2% of Energy Transfer shares are held by institutional investors. 32.6% of Enterprise Products Partners shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 3.3% of Energy Transfer shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

In the previous week, Enterprise Products Partners had 4 more articles in the media than Energy Transfer. MarketBeat recorded 23 mentions for Enterprise Products Partners and 19 mentions for Energy Transfer. Enterprise Products Partners' average media sentiment score of 1.02 beat Energy Transfer's score of 0.90 indicating that Enterprise Products Partners is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Enterprise Products Partners
16 Very Positive mention(s)
4 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
3 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
Energy Transfer
11 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
4 Neutral mention(s)
2 Negative mention(s)
1 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

Enterprise Products Partners has a net margin of 11.45% compared to Energy Transfer's net margin of 4.66%. Enterprise Products Partners' return on equity of 19.53% beat Energy Transfer's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Enterprise Products Partners11.45% 19.53% 7.53%
Energy Transfer 4.66%9.77%3.17%

Enterprise Products Partners presently has a consensus price target of $39.67, indicating a potential upside of 0.31%. Energy Transfer has a consensus price target of $22.73, indicating a potential upside of 13.11%. Given Energy Transfer's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Energy Transfer is more favorable than Enterprise Products Partners.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Enterprise Products Partners
1 Sell rating(s)
7 Hold rating(s)
9 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.47
Energy Transfer
0 Sell rating(s)
2 Hold rating(s)
10 Buy rating(s)
2 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00

Summary

Enterprise Products Partners beats Energy Transfer on 11 of the 20 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Energy Transfer compare to Kinder Morgan?

Energy Transfer (NYSE:ET) and Kinder Morgan (NYSE:KMI) are both large-cap energy companies, but which is the better investment? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their dividends, institutional ownership, valuation, risk, analyst recommendations, media sentiment, earnings and profitability.

38.2% of Energy Transfer shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 62.5% of Kinder Morgan shares are owned by institutional investors. 3.3% of Energy Transfer shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 12.7% of Kinder Morgan shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

In the previous week, Kinder Morgan had 10 more articles in the media than Energy Transfer. MarketBeat recorded 29 mentions for Kinder Morgan and 19 mentions for Energy Transfer. Kinder Morgan's average media sentiment score of 1.32 beat Energy Transfer's score of 0.90 indicating that Kinder Morgan is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Energy Transfer
11 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
4 Neutral mention(s)
2 Negative mention(s)
1 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
Kinder Morgan
24 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
2 Neutral mention(s)
2 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

Energy Transfer currently has a consensus price target of $22.73, suggesting a potential upside of 13.11%. Kinder Morgan has a consensus price target of $34.20, suggesting a potential upside of 1.20%. Given Energy Transfer's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, research analysts plainly believe Energy Transfer is more favorable than Kinder Morgan.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Energy Transfer
0 Sell rating(s)
2 Hold rating(s)
10 Buy rating(s)
2 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00
Kinder Morgan
0 Sell rating(s)
10 Hold rating(s)
6 Buy rating(s)
2 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.56

Kinder Morgan has a net margin of 18.92% compared to Energy Transfer's net margin of 4.66%. Kinder Morgan's return on equity of 9.90% beat Energy Transfer's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Energy Transfer4.66% 9.77% 3.17%
Kinder Morgan 18.92%9.90%4.40%

Energy Transfer has a beta of 0.57, meaning that its share price is 43% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Kinder Morgan has a beta of 0.56, meaning that its share price is 44% less volatile than the broader market.

Energy Transfer has higher revenue and earnings than Kinder Morgan. Energy Transfer is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Kinder Morgan, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Energy Transfer$92.29B0.75$4.18B$1.2016.74
Kinder Morgan$16.94B4.44$3.06B$1.4922.68

Energy Transfer pays an annual dividend of $1.35 per share and has a dividend yield of 6.7%. Kinder Morgan pays an annual dividend of $1.19 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.5%. Energy Transfer pays out 112.5% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Kinder Morgan pays out 79.9% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Energy Transfer has raised its dividend for 4 consecutive years and Kinder Morgan has raised its dividend for 9 consecutive years.

Summary

Kinder Morgan beats Energy Transfer on 12 of the 19 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Energy Transfer compare to Mplx?

Energy Transfer (NYSE:ET) and Mplx (NYSE:MPLX) are both large-cap energy companies, but which is the better business? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their institutional ownership, risk, earnings, valuation, media sentiment, profitability, analyst recommendations and dividends.

Energy Transfer currently has a consensus price target of $22.73, indicating a potential upside of 13.11%. Mplx has a consensus price target of $61.60, indicating a potential upside of 9.08%. Given Energy Transfer's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Energy Transfer is more favorable than Mplx.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Energy Transfer
0 Sell rating(s)
2 Hold rating(s)
10 Buy rating(s)
2 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00
Mplx
1 Sell rating(s)
4 Hold rating(s)
7 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.62

Energy Transfer has a beta of 0.57, suggesting that its stock price is 43% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Mplx has a beta of 0.49, suggesting that its stock price is 51% less volatile than the broader market.

Mplx has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Energy Transfer. Mplx is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Energy Transfer, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Energy Transfer$92.29B0.75$4.18B$1.2016.74
Mplx$11.39B5.03$4.91B$4.6212.22

38.2% of Energy Transfer shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 24.3% of Mplx shares are held by institutional investors. 3.3% of Energy Transfer shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

In the previous week, Energy Transfer had 11 more articles in the media than Mplx. MarketBeat recorded 19 mentions for Energy Transfer and 8 mentions for Mplx. Energy Transfer's average media sentiment score of 0.90 beat Mplx's score of 0.84 indicating that Energy Transfer is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Energy Transfer
11 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
4 Neutral mention(s)
2 Negative mention(s)
1 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
Mplx
6 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
1 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

Mplx has a net margin of 36.38% compared to Energy Transfer's net margin of 4.66%. Mplx's return on equity of 32.74% beat Energy Transfer's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Energy Transfer4.66% 9.77% 3.17%
Mplx 36.38%32.74%11.25%

Energy Transfer pays an annual dividend of $1.35 per share and has a dividend yield of 6.7%. Mplx pays an annual dividend of $4.30 per share and has a dividend yield of 7.6%. Energy Transfer pays out 112.5% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Mplx pays out 93.1% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Energy Transfer has raised its dividend for 4 consecutive years and Mplx has raised its dividend for 9 consecutive years. Mplx is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

Summary

Energy Transfer beats Mplx on 11 of the 20 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Energy Transfer News Delivered to You Automatically

Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for ET and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.

Subscribe Now
SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding ET and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.
Skip Chart

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of NYSE and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Skip Chart

ET vs. The Competition

MetricEnergy TransferOil/Gas Prod Pipeline MLP IndustryEnergy SectorNYSE Exchange
Market Cap$69.14B$36.56B$10.58B$23.19B
Dividend Yield6.75%6.42%10.23%4.10%
P/E Ratio16.7416.0921.1530.65
Price / Sales0.751.571,003.3514.65
Price / Cash6.998.2638.7425.12
Price / Book1.491.974.624.74
Net Income$4.18B$2.21B$4.24B$1.07B
7 Day Performance-0.63%-1.44%-0.20%1.45%
1 Month Performance5.61%6.97%2.37%1.58%
1 Year Performance12.61%17.22%54.56%28.44%

Energy Transfer Competitors List

CompanyMarketRankShare PriceAnalysts' Price Target1Y Price PerformanceMarket CapRevenueP/E RatioEmployee CountIndicator(s)
ET
Energy Transfer
4.2105 of 5 stars
$20.09
+0.1%
$22.73
+13.1%
+12.6%$69.14B$92.29B16.7422,311
AROC
Archrock
4.4438 of 5 stars
$38.29
+2.3%
$40.86
+6.7%
+50.2%$6.71B$1.49B20.811,350
ENB
Enbridge
3.576 of 5 stars
$56.23
+1.7%
$66.50
+18.3%
+26.1%$122.67B$46.66B26.3714,800
EPD
Enterprise Products Partners
4.5958 of 5 stars
$39.77
+1.4%
$39.60
-0.4%
+26.5%$85.88B$52.60B14.718,000
KMI
Kinder Morgan
3.5016 of 5 stars
$33.64
+0.0%
$34.20
+1.7%
+21.2%$74.79B$16.94B22.5611,028

Related Companies and Tools


This page (NYSE:ET) was last updated on 5/25/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.
From Our Partners