Go Pro

Constellation Energy (CEG) Competitors

Constellation Energy logo
$299.05 +0.09 (+0.03%)
Closing price 09/8/2026 04:00 PM Eastern
Extended Trading
$296.40 -2.65 (-0.89%)
As of 07:41 AM Eastern
Extended trading is trading that happens on electronic markets outside of regular trading hours. This is a fair market value extended hours price provided by Massive. Learn more.

CEG vs. META, MSFT, NVDA, TLN, and NRG

Should you buy Constellation Energy stock or one of its competitors? Constellation Energy's main competitors and comparable companies include Meta Platforms (META), Microsoft (MSFT), NVIDIA (NVDA), Talen Energy (TLN), and NRG Energy (NRG). Companies are selected based on similarities in market, industry, and size.

How does Constellation Energy compare to Meta Platforms?

Constellation Energy (NASDAQ:CEG) and Meta Platforms (NASDAQ:META) are related large-cap companies, but which is the better business? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their dividends, profitability, valuation, institutional ownership, risk, earnings, media sentiment and analyst recommendations.

Meta Platforms has higher revenue and earnings than Constellation Energy. Meta Platforms is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Constellation Energy, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Constellation Energy$31.27B3.39$2.32B$10.2629.15
Meta Platforms$200.97B7.78$60.46B$26.5523.11

Constellation Energy pays an annual dividend of $1.70 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.6%. Meta Platforms pays an annual dividend of $2.10 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.3%. Constellation Energy pays out 16.6% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Meta Platforms pays out 7.9% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Constellation Energy has raised its dividend for 3 consecutive years and Meta Platforms has raised its dividend for 1 consecutive years. Constellation Energy is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

82.2% of Constellation Energy shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 79.9% of Meta Platforms shares are held by institutional investors. 0.4% of Constellation Energy shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 13.5% of Meta Platforms shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Constellation Energy has a beta of 1.1, indicating that its stock price is 10% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Meta Platforms has a beta of 1.25, indicating that its stock price is 25% more volatile than the broader market.

Constellation Energy presently has a consensus target price of $352.90, suggesting a potential upside of 18.01%. Meta Platforms has a consensus target price of $785.22, suggesting a potential upside of 27.99%. Given Meta Platforms' stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Meta Platforms is more favorable than Constellation Energy.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Constellation Energy
0 Sell rating(s)
5 Hold rating(s)
15 Buy rating(s)
2 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.86
Meta Platforms
0 Sell rating(s)
9 Hold rating(s)
34 Buy rating(s)
4 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.89

Meta Platforms has a net margin of 29.83% compared to Constellation Energy's net margin of 11.08%. Meta Platforms' return on equity of 33.18% beat Constellation Energy's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Constellation Energy11.08% 14.89% 4.62%
Meta Platforms 29.83%33.18%20.07%

In the previous week, Meta Platforms had 133 more articles in the media than Constellation Energy. MarketBeat recorded 143 mentions for Meta Platforms and 10 mentions for Constellation Energy. Meta Platforms' average media sentiment score of 1.14 beat Constellation Energy's score of 0.71 indicating that Meta Platforms is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Constellation Energy
6 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
3 Neutral mention(s)
1 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
Meta Platforms
112 Very Positive mention(s)
4 Positive mention(s)
15 Neutral mention(s)
9 Negative mention(s)
2 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

Summary

Meta Platforms beats Constellation Energy on 16 of the 20 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Constellation Energy compare to Microsoft?

Constellation Energy (NASDAQ:CEG) and Microsoft (NASDAQ:MSFT) are related large-cap companies, but which is the better business? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their risk, earnings, media sentiment, profitability, dividends, valuation, analyst recommendations and institutional ownership.

Microsoft has higher revenue and earnings than Constellation Energy. Microsoft is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Constellation Energy, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Constellation Energy$31.27B3.39$2.32B$10.2629.15
Microsoft$331.84B11.05$133.75B$17.9627.50

Constellation Energy has a beta of 1.1, meaning that its share price is 10% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Microsoft has a beta of 1.11, meaning that its share price is 11% more volatile than the broader market.

Constellation Energy presently has a consensus price target of $352.90, suggesting a potential upside of 18.01%. Microsoft has a consensus price target of $564.27, suggesting a potential upside of 14.24%. Given Constellation Energy's higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Constellation Energy is more favorable than Microsoft.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Constellation Energy
0 Sell rating(s)
5 Hold rating(s)
15 Buy rating(s)
2 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.86
Microsoft
0 Sell rating(s)
5 Hold rating(s)
42 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.89

Microsoft has a net margin of 40.31% compared to Constellation Energy's net margin of 11.08%. Microsoft's return on equity of 31.98% beat Constellation Energy's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Constellation Energy11.08% 14.89% 4.62%
Microsoft 40.31%31.98%18.70%

In the previous week, Microsoft had 206 more articles in the media than Constellation Energy. MarketBeat recorded 216 mentions for Microsoft and 10 mentions for Constellation Energy. Microsoft's average media sentiment score of 0.87 beat Constellation Energy's score of 0.71 indicating that Microsoft is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Constellation Energy
6 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
3 Neutral mention(s)
1 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
Microsoft
131 Very Positive mention(s)
32 Positive mention(s)
32 Neutral mention(s)
12 Negative mention(s)
8 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

82.2% of Constellation Energy shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 71.1% of Microsoft shares are held by institutional investors. 0.4% of Constellation Energy shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 0.0% of Microsoft shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Constellation Energy pays an annual dividend of $1.70 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.6%. Microsoft pays an annual dividend of $3.64 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.7%. Constellation Energy pays out 16.6% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Microsoft pays out 20.3% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Constellation Energy has raised its dividend for 3 consecutive years and Microsoft has raised its dividend for 23 consecutive years. Microsoft is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

Summary

Microsoft beats Constellation Energy on 14 of the 20 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Constellation Energy compare to NVIDIA?

Constellation Energy (NASDAQ:CEG) and NVIDIA (NASDAQ:NVDA) are related large-cap companies, but which is the better stock? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their media sentiment, valuation, earnings, analyst recommendations, institutional ownership, dividends, profitability and risk.

Constellation Energy pays an annual dividend of $1.70 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.6%. NVIDIA pays an annual dividend of $1.00 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.4%. Constellation Energy pays out 16.6% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. NVIDIA pays out 12.6% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Constellation Energy has increased its dividend for 3 consecutive years and NVIDIA has increased its dividend for 1 consecutive years. Constellation Energy is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

In the previous week, NVIDIA had 352 more articles in the media than Constellation Energy. MarketBeat recorded 362 mentions for NVIDIA and 10 mentions for Constellation Energy. NVIDIA's average media sentiment score of 0.81 beat Constellation Energy's score of 0.71 indicating that NVIDIA is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Constellation Energy
6 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
3 Neutral mention(s)
1 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
NVIDIA
217 Very Positive mention(s)
50 Positive mention(s)
56 Neutral mention(s)
30 Negative mention(s)
2 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

Constellation Energy has a beta of 1.1, meaning that its stock price is 10% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, NVIDIA has a beta of 2.22, meaning that its stock price is 122% more volatile than the broader market.

Constellation Energy presently has a consensus price target of $352.90, indicating a potential upside of 18.01%. NVIDIA has a consensus price target of $324.83, indicating a potential upside of 43.90%. Given NVIDIA's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe NVIDIA is more favorable than Constellation Energy.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Constellation Energy
0 Sell rating(s)
5 Hold rating(s)
15 Buy rating(s)
2 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.86
NVIDIA
0 Sell rating(s)
3 Hold rating(s)
50 Buy rating(s)
2 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.98

82.2% of Constellation Energy shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 65.3% of NVIDIA shares are held by institutional investors. 0.4% of Constellation Energy shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 3.9% of NVIDIA shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

NVIDIA has higher revenue and earnings than Constellation Energy. NVIDIA is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Constellation Energy, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Constellation Energy$31.27B3.39$2.32B$10.2629.15
NVIDIA$302.97B17.96$120.07B$7.9128.54

NVIDIA has a net margin of 63.66% compared to Constellation Energy's net margin of 11.08%. NVIDIA's return on equity of 96.04% beat Constellation Energy's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Constellation Energy11.08% 14.89% 4.62%
NVIDIA 63.66%96.04%71.00%

Summary

NVIDIA beats Constellation Energy on 14 of the 19 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Constellation Energy compare to Talen Energy?

Constellation Energy (NASDAQ:CEG) and Talen Energy (NASDAQ:TLN) are both large-cap utilities companies, but which is the superior stock? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their media sentiment, earnings, analyst recommendations, institutional ownership, dividends, risk, valuation and profitability.

82.2% of Constellation Energy shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 0.4% of Talen Energy shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.4% of Constellation Energy shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 0.8% of Talen Energy shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Constellation Energy has higher revenue and earnings than Talen Energy. Talen Energy is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Constellation Energy, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Constellation Energy$31.27B3.39$2.32B$10.2629.15
Talen Energy$3.74B4.17-$219M-$4.17N/A

Constellation Energy presently has a consensus target price of $352.90, indicating a potential upside of 18.01%. Talen Energy has a consensus target price of $468.15, indicating a potential upside of 43.71%. Given Talen Energy's higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Talen Energy is more favorable than Constellation Energy.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Constellation Energy
0 Sell rating(s)
5 Hold rating(s)
15 Buy rating(s)
2 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.86
Talen Energy
1 Sell rating(s)
3 Hold rating(s)
9 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.62

Constellation Energy has a net margin of 11.08% compared to Talen Energy's net margin of -5.38%. Talen Energy's return on equity of 43.32% beat Constellation Energy's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Constellation Energy11.08% 14.89% 4.62%
Talen Energy -5.38%43.32%5.31%

Constellation Energy has a beta of 1.1, suggesting that its stock price is 10% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Talen Energy has a beta of 1.84, suggesting that its stock price is 84% more volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, Constellation Energy had 5 more articles in the media than Talen Energy. MarketBeat recorded 10 mentions for Constellation Energy and 5 mentions for Talen Energy. Talen Energy's average media sentiment score of 1.17 beat Constellation Energy's score of 0.71 indicating that Talen Energy is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Constellation Energy
6 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
3 Neutral mention(s)
1 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
Talen Energy
4 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
1 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

Summary

Constellation Energy beats Talen Energy on 10 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Constellation Energy compare to NRG Energy?

NRG Energy (NYSE:NRG) and Constellation Energy (NASDAQ:CEG) are both large-cap utilities companies, but which is the better stock? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their dividends, media sentiment, valuation, risk, earnings, profitability, institutional ownership and analyst recommendations.

97.7% of NRG Energy shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 82.2% of Constellation Energy shares are held by institutional investors. 0.4% of NRG Energy shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 0.4% of Constellation Energy shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

In the previous week, Constellation Energy had 7 more articles in the media than NRG Energy. MarketBeat recorded 10 mentions for Constellation Energy and 3 mentions for NRG Energy. NRG Energy's average media sentiment score of 1.06 beat Constellation Energy's score of 0.71 indicating that NRG Energy is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
NRG Energy
3 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
Constellation Energy
6 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
3 Neutral mention(s)
1 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

NRG Energy pays an annual dividend of $1.90 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.6%. Constellation Energy pays an annual dividend of $1.70 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.6%. NRG Energy pays out 50.3% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Constellation Energy pays out 16.6% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. NRG Energy has increased its dividend for 1 consecutive years and Constellation Energy has increased its dividend for 3 consecutive years.

Constellation Energy has a net margin of 11.08% compared to NRG Energy's net margin of 2.56%. NRG Energy's return on equity of 52.95% beat Constellation Energy's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
NRG Energy2.56% 52.95% 4.29%
Constellation Energy 11.08%14.89%4.62%

Constellation Energy has lower revenue, but higher earnings than NRG Energy. Constellation Energy is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than NRG Energy, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
NRG Energy$33.13B0.76$864M$3.7831.67
Constellation Energy$31.27B3.39$2.32B$10.2629.15

NRG Energy has a beta of 1.18, suggesting that its stock price is 18% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Constellation Energy has a beta of 1.1, suggesting that its stock price is 10% more volatile than the broader market.

NRG Energy presently has a consensus target price of $198.43, indicating a potential upside of 65.75%. Constellation Energy has a consensus target price of $352.90, indicating a potential upside of 18.01%. Given NRG Energy's higher probable upside, equities research analysts plainly believe NRG Energy is more favorable than Constellation Energy.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
NRG Energy
0 Sell rating(s)
4 Hold rating(s)
10 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.80
Constellation Energy
0 Sell rating(s)
5 Hold rating(s)
15 Buy rating(s)
2 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.86

Summary

Constellation Energy beats NRG Energy on 11 of the 20 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Constellation Energy News Delivered to You Automatically

Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for CEG and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.

Subscribe Now
SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding CEG and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.
Skip Chart

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of NASDAQ and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Skip Chart

CEG vs. The Competition

MetricConstellation EnergyElectric Utilities IndustryUtilities SectorNASDAQ Exchange
Market Cap$105.92B$28.16B$15.85B$12.89B
Dividend Yield0.57%4.17%4.03%9.14%
P/E Ratio29.1516.2125.0225.39
Price / Sales3.39567.87315.59107.94
Price / Cash19.5427.8118.7252.39
Price / Book7.301.712.236.40
Net Income$2.32B$1.60B$701.43M$358.18M
7 Day Performance3.11%0.98%0.55%0.04%
1 Month Performance10.80%-1.02%-1.12%-0.80%
1 Year Performance-0.59%15.84%9.84%12.47%

Constellation Energy Competitors List

CompanyMarketRankShare PriceAnalysts' Price Target1Y Price PerformanceMarket CapRevenueP/E RatioEmployee CountIndicator(s)
CEG
Constellation Energy
4.6525 of 5 stars
$299.05
+0.0%
$352.90
+18.0%
+0.1%$105.92B$31.27B29.1515,339
META
Meta Platforms
4.9787 of 5 stars
$572.34
-1.0%
$785.22
+37.2%
-18.5%$1.46T$200.97B21.5678,865
MSFT
Microsoft
4.9012 of 5 stars
$507.29
-1.2%
$560.27
+10.4%
-0.9%$3.77T$331.84B28.25223,000
NVDA
NVIDIA
4.9067 of 5 stars
$220.60
+1.4%
$324.23
+47.0%
+34.1%$5.32T$215.94B27.8942,000
TLN
Talen Energy
4.2531 of 5 stars
$295.76
-0.1%
$466.86
+57.8%
-15.1%$14.17B$2.58BN/A1,880

Related Companies and Tools


This page (NASDAQ:CEG) was last updated on 9/9/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.
From Our Partners