Free Trial

Constellation Energy (CEG) Competitors

Constellation Energy logo
$277.37 -5.03 (-1.78%)
As of 12:48 PM Eastern
This is a fair market value price provided by Massive. Learn more.

CEG vs. META, MSFT, NVDA, TLN, and CCJ

Should you buy Constellation Energy stock or one of its competitors? Constellation Energy's main competitors and comparable companies include Meta Platforms (META), Microsoft (MSFT), NVIDIA (NVDA), Talen Energy (TLN), and Cameco (CCJ). Companies are selected based on similarities in market, industry, and size.

How does Constellation Energy compare to Meta Platforms?

Meta Platforms (NASDAQ:META) and Constellation Energy (NASDAQ:CEG) are related large-cap companies, but which is the better business? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, risk, valuation, profitability, earnings, institutional ownership, dividends and media sentiment.

Meta Platforms has higher revenue and earnings than Constellation Energy. Meta Platforms is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Constellation Energy, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Meta Platforms$241.61B6.60$60.46B$29.3321.26
Constellation Energy$25.53B3.89$2.32B$12.4822.63

Meta Platforms pays an annual dividend of $2.10 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.3%. Constellation Energy pays an annual dividend of $1.71 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.6%. Meta Platforms pays out 7.2% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Constellation Energy pays out 13.7% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Meta Platforms has increased its dividend for 1 consecutive years and Constellation Energy has increased its dividend for 3 consecutive years. Constellation Energy is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

Meta Platforms has a net margin of 31.15% compared to Constellation Energy's net margin of 12.76%. Meta Platforms' return on equity of 30.73% beat Constellation Energy's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Meta Platforms31.15% 30.73% 18.08%
Constellation Energy 12.76%15.44%5.01%

Meta Platforms has a beta of 1.28, indicating that its stock price is 28% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Constellation Energy has a beta of 1.11, indicating that its stock price is 11% more volatile than the broader market.

Meta Platforms currently has a consensus target price of $833.12, suggesting a potential upside of 33.60%. Constellation Energy has a consensus target price of $348.00, suggesting a potential upside of 23.23%. Given Meta Platforms' stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Meta Platforms is more favorable than Constellation Energy.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Meta Platforms
0 Sell rating(s)
7 Hold rating(s)
47 Buy rating(s)
3 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.93
Constellation Energy
0 Sell rating(s)
4 Hold rating(s)
18 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.87

79.9% of Meta Platforms shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 82.2% of Constellation Energy shares are owned by institutional investors. 13.4% of Meta Platforms shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.4% of Constellation Energy shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

In the previous week, Meta Platforms had 90 more articles in the media than Constellation Energy. MarketBeat recorded 135 mentions for Meta Platforms and 45 mentions for Constellation Energy. Meta Platforms' average media sentiment score of 0.94 beat Constellation Energy's score of 0.67 indicating that Meta Platforms is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Meta Platforms
97 Very Positive mention(s)
6 Positive mention(s)
15 Neutral mention(s)
11 Negative mention(s)
2 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
Constellation Energy
12 Very Positive mention(s)
22 Positive mention(s)
4 Neutral mention(s)
4 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

Summary

Meta Platforms beats Constellation Energy on 16 of the 20 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Constellation Energy compare to Microsoft?

Constellation Energy (NASDAQ:CEG) and Microsoft (NASDAQ:MSFT) are related large-cap companies, but which is the better investment? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their dividends, institutional ownership, earnings, analyst recommendations, valuation, media sentiment, profitability and risk.

Constellation Energy has a beta of 1.11, suggesting that its stock price is 11% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Microsoft has a beta of 1.05, suggesting that its stock price is 5% more volatile than the broader market.

82.2% of Constellation Energy shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 71.1% of Microsoft shares are held by institutional investors. 0.4% of Constellation Energy shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 0.0% of Microsoft shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Microsoft has a net margin of 41.17% compared to Constellation Energy's net margin of 12.76%. Microsoft's return on equity of 31.28% beat Constellation Energy's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Constellation Energy12.76% 15.44% 5.01%
Microsoft 41.17%31.28%18.55%

Constellation Energy pays an annual dividend of $1.71 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.6%. Microsoft pays an annual dividend of $3.64 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.7%. Constellation Energy pays out 13.7% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Microsoft pays out 19.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Constellation Energy has raised its dividend for 3 consecutive years and Microsoft has raised its dividend for 23 consecutive years. Microsoft is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

Constellation Energy currently has a consensus price target of $348.00, indicating a potential upside of 23.23%. Microsoft has a consensus price target of $609.54, indicating a potential upside of 16.55%. Given Constellation Energy's higher possible upside, equities research analysts plainly believe Constellation Energy is more favorable than Microsoft.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Constellation Energy
0 Sell rating(s)
4 Hold rating(s)
18 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.87
Microsoft
0 Sell rating(s)
4 Hold rating(s)
46 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.94

In the previous week, Microsoft had 226 more articles in the media than Constellation Energy. MarketBeat recorded 271 mentions for Microsoft and 45 mentions for Constellation Energy. Constellation Energy's average media sentiment score of 0.67 beat Microsoft's score of 0.64 indicating that Constellation Energy is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Constellation Energy
12 Very Positive mention(s)
22 Positive mention(s)
4 Neutral mention(s)
4 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
Microsoft
134 Very Positive mention(s)
35 Positive mention(s)
41 Neutral mention(s)
32 Negative mention(s)
19 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

Microsoft has higher revenue and earnings than Constellation Energy. Constellation Energy is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Microsoft, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Constellation Energy$25.53B3.89$2.32B$12.4822.63
Microsoft$331.84B11.70$133.75B$19.1627.30

Summary

Microsoft beats Constellation Energy on 13 of the 19 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Constellation Energy compare to NVIDIA?

Constellation Energy (NASDAQ:CEG) and NVIDIA (NASDAQ:NVDA) are related large-cap companies, but which is the better business? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their dividends, risk, institutional ownership, profitability, valuation, earnings, media sentiment and analyst recommendations.

NVIDIA has higher revenue and earnings than Constellation Energy. NVIDIA is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Constellation Energy, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Constellation Energy$25.53B3.89$2.32B$12.4822.63
NVIDIA$215.94B18.55$120.07B$7.9121.01

In the previous week, NVIDIA had 391 more articles in the media than Constellation Energy. MarketBeat recorded 436 mentions for NVIDIA and 45 mentions for Constellation Energy. Constellation Energy's average media sentiment score of 0.67 beat NVIDIA's score of -0.29 indicating that Constellation Energy is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Constellation Energy
12 Very Positive mention(s)
22 Positive mention(s)
4 Neutral mention(s)
4 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
NVIDIA
62 Very Positive mention(s)
30 Positive mention(s)
104 Neutral mention(s)
195 Negative mention(s)
26 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral

Constellation Energy has a beta of 1.11, suggesting that its share price is 11% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, NVIDIA has a beta of 2.21, suggesting that its share price is 121% more volatile than the broader market.

NVIDIA has a net margin of 63.66% compared to Constellation Energy's net margin of 12.76%. NVIDIA's return on equity of 96.04% beat Constellation Energy's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Constellation Energy12.76% 15.44% 5.01%
NVIDIA 63.66%96.04%71.00%

Constellation Energy pays an annual dividend of $1.71 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.6%. NVIDIA pays an annual dividend of $1.00 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.6%. Constellation Energy pays out 13.7% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. NVIDIA pays out 12.6% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Constellation Energy has raised its dividend for 3 consecutive years and NVIDIA has raised its dividend for 1 consecutive years. Constellation Energy is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

82.2% of Constellation Energy shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 65.3% of NVIDIA shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.4% of Constellation Energy shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 3.9% of NVIDIA shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Constellation Energy presently has a consensus price target of $348.00, indicating a potential upside of 23.23%. NVIDIA has a consensus price target of $283.63, indicating a potential upside of 70.67%. Given NVIDIA's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe NVIDIA is more favorable than Constellation Energy.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Constellation Energy
0 Sell rating(s)
4 Hold rating(s)
18 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.87
NVIDIA
0 Sell rating(s)
12 Hold rating(s)
39 Buy rating(s)
5 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.88

Summary

NVIDIA beats Constellation Energy on 15 of the 20 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Constellation Energy compare to Talen Energy?

Talen Energy (NASDAQ:TLN) and Constellation Energy (NASDAQ:CEG) are both large-cap utilities companies, but which is the better investment? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their valuation, risk, earnings, profitability, analyst recommendations, institutional ownership, media sentiment and dividends.

Constellation Energy has higher revenue and earnings than Talen Energy. Talen Energy is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Constellation Energy, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Talen Energy$2.58B6.52-$219M-$5.54N/A
Constellation Energy$25.53B3.89$2.32B$12.4822.63

In the previous week, Constellation Energy had 26 more articles in the media than Talen Energy. MarketBeat recorded 45 mentions for Constellation Energy and 19 mentions for Talen Energy. Talen Energy's average media sentiment score of 0.96 beat Constellation Energy's score of 0.67 indicating that Talen Energy is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Talen Energy
9 Very Positive mention(s)
6 Positive mention(s)
2 Neutral mention(s)
1 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
Constellation Energy
12 Very Positive mention(s)
22 Positive mention(s)
4 Neutral mention(s)
4 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

0.4% of Talen Energy shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 82.2% of Constellation Energy shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.8% of Talen Energy shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 0.4% of Constellation Energy shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Constellation Energy has a net margin of 12.76% compared to Talen Energy's net margin of -6.43%. Talen Energy's return on equity of 53.70% beat Constellation Energy's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Talen Energy-6.43% 53.70% 5.58%
Constellation Energy 12.76%15.44%5.01%

Talen Energy currently has a consensus target price of $458.69, suggesting a potential upside of 18.62%. Constellation Energy has a consensus target price of $348.00, suggesting a potential upside of 23.23%. Given Constellation Energy's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Constellation Energy is more favorable than Talen Energy.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Talen Energy
2 Sell rating(s)
2 Hold rating(s)
12 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.63
Constellation Energy
0 Sell rating(s)
4 Hold rating(s)
18 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.87

Talen Energy has a beta of 1.77, meaning that its stock price is 77% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Constellation Energy has a beta of 1.11, meaning that its stock price is 11% more volatile than the broader market.

Summary

Constellation Energy beats Talen Energy on 11 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Constellation Energy compare to Cameco?

Cameco (NYSE:CCJ) and Constellation Energy (NASDAQ:CEG) are related large-cap companies, but which is the superior stock? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their institutional ownership, profitability, analyst recommendations, dividends, earnings, risk, media sentiment and valuation.

In the previous week, Constellation Energy had 18 more articles in the media than Cameco. MarketBeat recorded 45 mentions for Constellation Energy and 27 mentions for Cameco. Constellation Energy's average media sentiment score of 0.67 beat Cameco's score of 0.61 indicating that Constellation Energy is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Cameco
13 Very Positive mention(s)
2 Positive mention(s)
5 Neutral mention(s)
3 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
Constellation Energy
12 Very Positive mention(s)
22 Positive mention(s)
4 Neutral mention(s)
4 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

Cameco currently has a consensus price target of $148.12, suggesting a potential upside of 106.31%. Constellation Energy has a consensus price target of $348.00, suggesting a potential upside of 23.23%. Given Cameco's higher possible upside, equities analysts clearly believe Cameco is more favorable than Constellation Energy.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Cameco
0 Sell rating(s)
4 Hold rating(s)
12 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.75
Constellation Energy
0 Sell rating(s)
4 Hold rating(s)
18 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.87

Constellation Energy has a net margin of 12.76% compared to Cameco's net margin of 11.44%. Constellation Energy's return on equity of 15.44% beat Cameco's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Cameco11.44% 7.01% 4.84%
Constellation Energy 12.76%15.44%5.01%

70.2% of Cameco shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 82.2% of Constellation Energy shares are owned by institutional investors. 1.0% of Cameco shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.4% of Constellation Energy shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Constellation Energy has higher revenue and earnings than Cameco. Constellation Energy is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Cameco, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Cameco$2.49B12.55$421.96M$0.66108.78
Constellation Energy$25.53B3.89$2.32B$12.4822.63

Cameco has a beta of 1.18, suggesting that its stock price is 18% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Constellation Energy has a beta of 1.11, suggesting that its stock price is 11% more volatile than the broader market.

Cameco pays an annual dividend of $0.17 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.2%. Constellation Energy pays an annual dividend of $1.71 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.6%. Cameco pays out 25.8% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Constellation Energy pays out 13.7% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Cameco has raised its dividend for 1 consecutive years and Constellation Energy has raised its dividend for 3 consecutive years. Constellation Energy is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

Summary

Constellation Energy beats Cameco on 15 of the 20 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Constellation Energy News Delivered to You Automatically

Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for CEG and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.

Subscribe Now
SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding CEG and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.
Skip Chart

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of NASDAQ and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Skip Chart

CEG vs. The Competition

MetricConstellation EnergyElectric Utilities IndustryUtilities SectorNASDAQ Exchange
Market Cap$97.50B$29.37B$16.00B$12.01B
Dividend Yield0.62%3.91%3.93%4.50%
P/E Ratio22.2221.8835.1530.36
Price / Sales3.822.413.025.82
Price / Cash17.9512.5813.5522.80
Price / Book2.951.641.923.77
Net Income$2.32B$1.64B$696.41M$390.55M
7 Day Performance10.97%0.27%0.45%-0.58%
1 Month Performance-6.23%1.09%0.61%-6.84%
1 Year Performance-17.39%6.92%0.55%-6.12%

Constellation Energy Competitors List

CompanyMarketRankShare PriceAnalysts' Price Target1Y Price PerformanceMarket CapRevenueP/E RatioEmployee CountIndicator(s)
CEG
Constellation Energy
4.804 of 5 stars
$277.37
-1.8%
$348.00
+25.5%
-20.2%$97.50B$25.53B22.2215,339
META
Meta Platforms
4.9201 of 5 stars
$606.73
-1.3%
$833.12
+37.3%
+2.4%$1.55T$200.97B20.6978,865
MSFT
Microsoft
4.8768 of 5 stars
$507.12
-2.8%
$609.54
+20.2%
+2.3%$3.77T$331.84B26.47223,000
NVDA
NVIDIA
4.9292 of 5 stars
$202.06
-1.3%
$319.45
+58.1%
-14.2%$4.87T$215.94B25.5442,000
TLN
Talen Energy
3.2715 of 5 stars
$332.99
-3.0%
$458.69
+37.7%
+5.2%$15.95B$2.58BN/A1,880

Related Companies and Tools


This page (NASDAQ:CEG) was last updated on 11/13/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.
From Our Partners