Go Pro

Constellation Energy (CEG) Competitors

Constellation Energy logo
$274.17 +7.34 (+2.75%)
Closing price 08/19/2026 04:00 PM Eastern
Extended Trading
$272.07 -2.10 (-0.77%)
As of 06:07 AM Eastern
Extended trading is trading that happens on electronic markets outside of regular trading hours. This is a fair market value extended hours price provided by Massive. Learn more.

CEG vs. META, MSFT, NVDA, TLN, and NRG

Should you buy Constellation Energy stock or one of its competitors? Constellation Energy's main competitors and comparable companies include Meta Platforms (META), Microsoft (MSFT), NVIDIA (NVDA), Talen Energy (TLN), and NRG Energy (NRG). Companies are selected based on similarities in market, industry, and size.

How does Constellation Energy compare to Meta Platforms?

Constellation Energy (NASDAQ:CEG) and Meta Platforms (NASDAQ:META) are related large-cap companies, but which is the superior business? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their institutional ownership, earnings, media sentiment, dividends, analyst recommendations, valuation, risk and profitability.

Constellation Energy currently has a consensus target price of $353.00, suggesting a potential upside of 28.75%. Meta Platforms has a consensus target price of $785.32, suggesting a potential upside of 43.82%. Given Meta Platforms' stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Meta Platforms is more favorable than Constellation Energy.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Constellation Energy
0 Sell rating(s)
5 Hold rating(s)
15 Buy rating(s)
2 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.86
Meta Platforms
0 Sell rating(s)
8 Hold rating(s)
35 Buy rating(s)
4 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.91

Meta Platforms has a net margin of 29.83% compared to Constellation Energy's net margin of 11.08%. Meta Platforms' return on equity of 33.18% beat Constellation Energy's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Constellation Energy11.08% 14.89% 4.62%
Meta Platforms 29.83%33.18%20.07%

In the previous week, Meta Platforms had 148 more articles in the media than Constellation Energy. MarketBeat recorded 157 mentions for Meta Platforms and 9 mentions for Constellation Energy. Constellation Energy's average media sentiment score of 0.84 beat Meta Platforms' score of 0.48 indicating that Constellation Energy is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Constellation Energy
6 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
1 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
Meta Platforms
84 Very Positive mention(s)
14 Positive mention(s)
18 Neutral mention(s)
32 Negative mention(s)
8 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral

82.2% of Constellation Energy shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 79.9% of Meta Platforms shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.4% of Constellation Energy shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 13.5% of Meta Platforms shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Meta Platforms has higher revenue and earnings than Constellation Energy. Meta Platforms is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Constellation Energy, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Constellation Energy$25.53B3.80$2.32B$10.2626.72
Meta Platforms$228.25B6.09$60.46B$26.5520.57

Constellation Energy pays an annual dividend of $1.71 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.6%. Meta Platforms pays an annual dividend of $2.10 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.4%. Constellation Energy pays out 16.7% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Meta Platforms pays out 7.9% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Constellation Energy has raised its dividend for 3 consecutive years and Meta Platforms has raised its dividend for 1 consecutive years. Constellation Energy is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

Constellation Energy has a beta of 1.1, meaning that its share price is 10% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Meta Platforms has a beta of 1.25, meaning that its share price is 25% more volatile than the broader market.

Summary

Meta Platforms beats Constellation Energy on 15 of the 20 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Constellation Energy compare to Microsoft?

Microsoft (NASDAQ:MSFT) and Constellation Energy (NASDAQ:CEG) are related large-cap companies, but which is the better business? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their media sentiment, profitability, analyst recommendations, dividends, earnings, risk, valuation and institutional ownership.

In the previous week, Microsoft had 278 more articles in the media than Constellation Energy. MarketBeat recorded 287 mentions for Microsoft and 9 mentions for Constellation Energy. Microsoft's average media sentiment score of 1.00 beat Constellation Energy's score of 0.84 indicating that Microsoft is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Microsoft
182 Very Positive mention(s)
44 Positive mention(s)
38 Neutral mention(s)
21 Negative mention(s)
2 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
Constellation Energy
6 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
1 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

Microsoft has a net margin of 40.31% compared to Constellation Energy's net margin of 11.08%. Microsoft's return on equity of 31.98% beat Constellation Energy's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Microsoft40.31% 31.98% 18.70%
Constellation Energy 11.08%14.89%4.62%

Microsoft has a beta of 1.11, indicating that its stock price is 11% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Constellation Energy has a beta of 1.1, indicating that its stock price is 10% more volatile than the broader market.

Microsoft presently has a consensus target price of $560.27, suggesting a potential upside of 15.68%. Constellation Energy has a consensus target price of $353.00, suggesting a potential upside of 28.75%. Given Constellation Energy's higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Constellation Energy is more favorable than Microsoft.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Microsoft
0 Sell rating(s)
5 Hold rating(s)
42 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.89
Constellation Energy
0 Sell rating(s)
5 Hold rating(s)
15 Buy rating(s)
2 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.86

Microsoft pays an annual dividend of $3.64 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.8%. Constellation Energy pays an annual dividend of $1.71 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.6%. Microsoft pays out 20.3% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Constellation Energy pays out 16.7% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Microsoft has increased its dividend for 23 consecutive years and Constellation Energy has increased its dividend for 3 consecutive years. Microsoft is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

71.1% of Microsoft shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 82.2% of Constellation Energy shares are held by institutional investors. 0.0% of Microsoft shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 0.4% of Constellation Energy shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Microsoft has higher revenue and earnings than Constellation Energy. Constellation Energy is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Microsoft, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Microsoft$331.84B10.84$133.75B$17.9626.97
Constellation Energy$25.53B3.80$2.32B$10.2626.72

Summary

Microsoft beats Constellation Energy on 15 of the 20 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Constellation Energy compare to NVIDIA?

NVIDIA (NASDAQ:NVDA) and Constellation Energy (NASDAQ:CEG) are related large-cap companies, but which is the superior business? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their dividends, valuation, profitability, institutional ownership, media sentiment, earnings, risk and analyst recommendations.

NVIDIA pays an annual dividend of $1.00 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.5%. Constellation Energy pays an annual dividend of $1.71 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.6%. NVIDIA pays out 15.3% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Constellation Energy pays out 16.7% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. NVIDIA has increased its dividend for 1 consecutive years and Constellation Energy has increased its dividend for 3 consecutive years. Constellation Energy is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

In the previous week, NVIDIA had 317 more articles in the media than Constellation Energy. MarketBeat recorded 326 mentions for NVIDIA and 9 mentions for Constellation Energy. Constellation Energy's average media sentiment score of 0.84 beat NVIDIA's score of 0.76 indicating that Constellation Energy is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
NVIDIA
168 Very Positive mention(s)
54 Positive mention(s)
65 Neutral mention(s)
33 Negative mention(s)
6 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
Constellation Energy
6 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
1 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

NVIDIA has higher revenue and earnings than Constellation Energy. Constellation Energy is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than NVIDIA, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
NVIDIA$215.94B24.38$120.07B$6.5333.32
Constellation Energy$25.53B3.80$2.32B$10.2626.72

NVIDIA has a net margin of 62.97% compared to Constellation Energy's net margin of 11.08%. NVIDIA's return on equity of 96.94% beat Constellation Energy's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
NVIDIA62.97% 96.94% 72.16%
Constellation Energy 11.08%14.89%4.62%

65.3% of NVIDIA shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 82.2% of Constellation Energy shares are held by institutional investors. 3.9% of NVIDIA shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.4% of Constellation Energy shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

NVIDIA has a beta of 2.23, indicating that its share price is 123% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Constellation Energy has a beta of 1.1, indicating that its share price is 10% more volatile than the broader market.

NVIDIA presently has a consensus target price of $305.94, indicating a potential upside of 40.62%. Constellation Energy has a consensus target price of $353.00, indicating a potential upside of 28.75%. Given NVIDIA's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe NVIDIA is more favorable than Constellation Energy.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
NVIDIA
0 Sell rating(s)
2 Hold rating(s)
49 Buy rating(s)
3 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.02
Constellation Energy
0 Sell rating(s)
5 Hold rating(s)
15 Buy rating(s)
2 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.86

Summary

NVIDIA beats Constellation Energy on 15 of the 20 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Constellation Energy compare to Talen Energy?

Constellation Energy (NASDAQ:CEG) and Talen Energy (NASDAQ:TLN) are both large-cap utilities companies, but which is the better stock? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their profitability, risk, institutional ownership, valuation, media sentiment, dividends, analyst recommendations and earnings.

In the previous week, Constellation Energy and Constellation Energy both had 9 articles in the media. Talen Energy's average media sentiment score of 1.66 beat Constellation Energy's score of 0.84 indicating that Talen Energy is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Constellation Energy
6 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
1 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
Talen Energy
7 Very Positive mention(s)
2 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Very Positive

Constellation Energy has higher revenue and earnings than Talen Energy. Talen Energy is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Constellation Energy, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Constellation Energy$25.53B3.80$2.32B$10.2626.72
Talen Energy$2.58B5.98-$219M-$4.17N/A

Constellation Energy has a beta of 1.1, indicating that its share price is 10% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Talen Energy has a beta of 1.9, indicating that its share price is 90% more volatile than the broader market.

Constellation Energy has a net margin of 11.08% compared to Talen Energy's net margin of -5.38%. Talen Energy's return on equity of 43.32% beat Constellation Energy's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Constellation Energy11.08% 14.89% 4.62%
Talen Energy -5.38%43.32%5.31%

Constellation Energy currently has a consensus target price of $353.00, indicating a potential upside of 28.75%. Talen Energy has a consensus target price of $477.58, indicating a potential upside of 48.16%. Given Talen Energy's higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Talen Energy is more favorable than Constellation Energy.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Constellation Energy
0 Sell rating(s)
5 Hold rating(s)
15 Buy rating(s)
2 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.86
Talen Energy
0 Sell rating(s)
3 Hold rating(s)
9 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.85

82.2% of Constellation Energy shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 0.4% of Talen Energy shares are held by institutional investors. 0.4% of Constellation Energy shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.8% of Talen Energy shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Summary

Constellation Energy beats Talen Energy on 9 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Constellation Energy compare to NRG Energy?

NRG Energy (NYSE:NRG) and Constellation Energy (NASDAQ:CEG) are both large-cap utilities companies, but which is the superior business? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their media sentiment, risk, institutional ownership, earnings, profitability, dividends, valuation and analyst recommendations.

NRG Energy pays an annual dividend of $1.90 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.6%. Constellation Energy pays an annual dividend of $1.71 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.6%. NRG Energy pays out 50.3% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Constellation Energy pays out 16.7% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. NRG Energy has increased its dividend for 1 consecutive years and Constellation Energy has increased its dividend for 3 consecutive years.

Constellation Energy has lower revenue, but higher earnings than NRG Energy. Constellation Energy is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than NRG Energy, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
NRG Energy$30.71B0.83$864M$3.7831.91
Constellation Energy$25.53B3.80$2.32B$10.2626.72

In the previous week, Constellation Energy had 5 more articles in the media than NRG Energy. MarketBeat recorded 9 mentions for Constellation Energy and 4 mentions for NRG Energy. NRG Energy's average media sentiment score of 1.20 beat Constellation Energy's score of 0.84 indicating that NRG Energy is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
NRG Energy
3 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
Constellation Energy
6 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
1 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

Constellation Energy has a net margin of 11.08% compared to NRG Energy's net margin of 2.56%. NRG Energy's return on equity of 52.95% beat Constellation Energy's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
NRG Energy2.56% 52.95% 4.29%
Constellation Energy 11.08%14.89%4.62%

NRG Energy has a beta of 1.22, indicating that its share price is 22% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Constellation Energy has a beta of 1.1, indicating that its share price is 10% more volatile than the broader market.

NRG Energy presently has a consensus target price of $198.64, suggesting a potential upside of 64.70%. Constellation Energy has a consensus target price of $353.00, suggesting a potential upside of 28.75%. Given NRG Energy's higher possible upside, equities analysts plainly believe NRG Energy is more favorable than Constellation Energy.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
NRG Energy
0 Sell rating(s)
4 Hold rating(s)
10 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.80
Constellation Energy
0 Sell rating(s)
5 Hold rating(s)
15 Buy rating(s)
2 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.86

97.7% of NRG Energy shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 82.2% of Constellation Energy shares are held by institutional investors. 0.4% of NRG Energy shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 0.4% of Constellation Energy shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Summary

Constellation Energy beats NRG Energy on 11 of the 20 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Constellation Energy News Delivered to You Automatically

Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for CEG and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.

Subscribe Now
SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding CEG and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.
Skip Chart

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of NASDAQ and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Skip Chart

CEG vs. The Competition

MetricConstellation EnergyElectric Utilities IndustryUtilities SectorNASDAQ Exchange
Market Cap$94.54B$28.81B$16.06B$12.86B
Dividend Yield0.64%4.14%4.02%10.29%
P/E Ratio26.7216.3425.1824.23
Price / Sales3.80583.74376.01101.67
Price / Cash17.4427.9018.7652.73
Price / Book3.011.642.246.25
Net Income$2.32B$1.60B$701.59M$348.04M
7 Day Performance-1.60%-0.52%-0.45%-0.17%
1 Month Performance8.15%-1.57%-1.34%2.66%
1 Year Performance-12.74%13.70%9.42%21.01%

Constellation Energy Competitors List

CompanyMarketRankShare PriceAnalysts' Price Target1Y Price PerformanceMarket CapRevenueP/E RatioEmployee CountIndicator(s)
CEG
Constellation Energy
4.8307 of 5 stars
$274.17
+2.8%
$353.00
+28.8%
-13.6%$94.54B$25.53B26.7215,339
META
Meta Platforms
4.9947 of 5 stars
$594.92
+0.5%
$785.32
+32.0%
-27.3%$1.52T$200.97B22.4178,865
MSFT
Microsoft
4.9581 of 5 stars
$506.06
+1.2%
$559.16
+10.5%
-5.0%$3.76T$331.84B28.18223,000
NVDA
NVIDIA
4.994 of 5 stars
$217.55
-2.9%
$304.26
+39.9%
+23.9%$5.26T$215.94B33.3242,000
TLN
Talen Energy
4.7435 of 5 stars
$343.19
-1.3%
$476.58
+38.9%
-12.4%$16.44B$2.58BN/A1,880

Related Companies and Tools


This page (NASDAQ:CEG) was last updated on 8/20/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.
From Our Partners