Vistra (VST) Competitors

In the previous week, Meta Platforms had 191 more articles in the media than Vistra. MarketBeat recorded 213 mentions for Meta Platforms and 22 mentions for Vistra. Meta Platforms' average media sentiment score of 0.80 beat Vistra's score of 0.47 indicating that Meta Platforms is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Meta Platforms currently has a consensus price target of $787.86, suggesting a potential upside of 8.21%. Vistra has a consensus price target of $219.33, suggesting a potential upside of 56.73%. Given Vistra's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Vistra is more favorable than Meta Platforms.

Meta Platforms has a beta of 1.19, suggesting that its stock price is 19% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Vistra has a beta of 1.38, suggesting that its stock price is 38% more volatile than the broader market.

Meta Platforms has higher revenue and earnings than Vistra. Vistra is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Meta Platforms, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

79.9% of Meta Platforms shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 90.9% of Vistra shares are owned by institutional investors. 13.5% of Meta Platforms shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 0.9% of Vistra shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Meta Platforms pays an annual dividend of $2.10 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.3%. Vistra pays an annual dividend of $0.92 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.7%. Meta Platforms pays out 7.9% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Vistra pays out 15.5% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Meta Platforms has increased its dividend for 1 consecutive years and Vistra has increased its dividend for 6 consecutive years. Vistra is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

Meta Platforms has a net margin of 29.83% compared to Vistra's net margin of 11.55%. Vistra's return on equity of 108.68% beat Meta Platforms' return on equity.

Talen Energy currently has a consensus price target of $460.08, indicating a potential upside of 43.43%. Vistra has a consensus price target of $219.33, indicating a potential upside of 56.73%. Given Vistra's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Vistra is more favorable than Talen Energy.

In the previous week, Vistra had 10 more articles in the media than Talen Energy. MarketBeat recorded 22 mentions for Vistra and 12 mentions for Talen Energy. Talen Energy's average media sentiment score of 0.94 beat Vistra's score of 0.47 indicating that Talen Energy is being referred to more favorably in the media.

0.4% of Talen Energy shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 90.9% of Vistra shares are held by institutional investors. 0.8% of Talen Energy shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 0.9% of Vistra shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Vistra has higher revenue and earnings than Talen Energy. Talen Energy is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Vistra, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Talen Energy has a beta of 1.82, indicating that its share price is 82% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Vistra has a beta of 1.38, indicating that its share price is 38% more volatile than the broader market.

Vistra has a net margin of 11.55% compared to Talen Energy's net margin of -5.38%. Vistra's return on equity of 108.68% beat Talen Energy's return on equity.

90.9% of Vistra shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 92.6% of EMCOR Group shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.9% of Vistra shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.7% of EMCOR Group shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Vistra currently has a consensus target price of $219.33, indicating a potential upside of 56.73%. EMCOR Group has a consensus target price of $965.86, indicating a potential upside of 22.64%. Given Vistra's higher possible upside, research analysts plainly believe Vistra is more favorable than EMCOR Group.

Vistra has a net margin of 11.55% compared to EMCOR Group's net margin of 7.74%. Vistra's return on equity of 108.68% beat EMCOR Group's return on equity.

EMCOR Group has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Vistra. Vistra is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than EMCOR Group, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Vistra has a beta of 1.38, meaning that its stock price is 38% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, EMCOR Group has a beta of 1.12, meaning that its stock price is 12% more volatile than the broader market.

Vistra pays an annual dividend of $0.92 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.7%. EMCOR Group pays an annual dividend of $1.60 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.2%. Vistra pays out 15.5% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. EMCOR Group pays out 5.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Vistra has raised its dividend for 6 consecutive years and EMCOR Group has raised its dividend for 5 consecutive years. Vistra is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

In the previous week, Vistra had 13 more articles in the media than EMCOR Group. MarketBeat recorded 22 mentions for Vistra and 9 mentions for EMCOR Group. EMCOR Group's average media sentiment score of 0.51 beat Vistra's score of 0.47 indicating that EMCOR Group is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

90.9% of Vistra shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 83.0% of Eaton shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.9% of Vistra shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 0.1% of Eaton shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

In the previous week, Vistra had 2 more articles in the media than Eaton. MarketBeat recorded 22 mentions for Vistra and 20 mentions for Eaton. Eaton's average media sentiment score of 0.85 beat Vistra's score of 0.47 indicating that Eaton is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Eaton has higher revenue and earnings than Vistra. Vistra is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Eaton, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Vistra presently has a consensus target price of $219.33, indicating a potential upside of 56.73%. Eaton has a consensus target price of $456.50, indicating a potential upside of 4.86%. Given Vistra's higher probable upside, equities research analysts clearly believe Vistra is more favorable than Eaton.

Vistra pays an annual dividend of $0.92 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.7%. Eaton pays an annual dividend of $4.40 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.0%. Vistra pays out 15.5% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Eaton pays out 44.8% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Vistra has raised its dividend for 6 consecutive years.

Eaton has a net margin of 12.75% compared to Vistra's net margin of 11.55%. Vistra's return on equity of 108.68% beat Eaton's return on equity.

Vistra has a beta of 1.38, indicating that its share price is 38% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Eaton has a beta of 1.13, indicating that its share price is 13% more volatile than the broader market.