Plains All American Pipeline (PAA) Competitors

41.8% of Plains All American Pipeline shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 38.2% of Energy Transfer shares are owned by institutional investors. 1.1% of Plains All American Pipeline shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 3.3% of Energy Transfer shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Energy Transfer has higher revenue and earnings than Plains All American Pipeline. Energy Transfer is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Plains All American Pipeline, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Energy Transfer has a net margin of 4.66% compared to Plains All American Pipeline's net margin of 2.53%. Plains All American Pipeline's return on equity of 12.17% beat Energy Transfer's return on equity.

Plains All American Pipeline has a beta of 0.5, indicating that its stock price is 50% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Energy Transfer has a beta of 0.55, indicating that its stock price is 45% less volatile than the broader market.

Plains All American Pipeline pays an annual dividend of $1.67 per share and has a dividend yield of 7.4%. Energy Transfer pays an annual dividend of $1.35 per share and has a dividend yield of 6.9%. Plains All American Pipeline pays out 127.5% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Energy Transfer pays out 112.5% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Plains All American Pipeline has increased its dividend for 5 consecutive years and Energy Transfer has increased its dividend for 4 consecutive years. Plains All American Pipeline is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

In the previous week, Energy Transfer had 30 more articles in the media than Plains All American Pipeline. MarketBeat recorded 32 mentions for Energy Transfer and 2 mentions for Plains All American Pipeline. Energy Transfer's average media sentiment score of 1.12 beat Plains All American Pipeline's score of -0.35 indicating that Energy Transfer is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Plains All American Pipeline presently has a consensus target price of $22.64, suggesting a potential upside of 0.19%. Energy Transfer has a consensus target price of $23.45, suggesting a potential upside of 20.67%. Given Energy Transfer's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Energy Transfer is more favorable than Plains All American Pipeline.

Plains All American Pipeline pays an annual dividend of $1.67 per share and has a dividend yield of 7.4%. Mplx pays an annual dividend of $4.30 per share and has a dividend yield of 7.6%. Plains All American Pipeline pays out 127.5% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Mplx pays out 93.1% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Plains All American Pipeline has raised its dividend for 5 consecutive years and Mplx has raised its dividend for 9 consecutive years. Mplx is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

Plains All American Pipeline has a beta of 0.5, meaning that its share price is 50% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Mplx has a beta of 0.48, meaning that its share price is 52% less volatile than the broader market.

41.8% of Plains All American Pipeline shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 24.3% of Mplx shares are owned by institutional investors. 1.1% of Plains All American Pipeline shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Mplx has a net margin of 36.38% compared to Plains All American Pipeline's net margin of 2.53%. Mplx's return on equity of 32.74% beat Plains All American Pipeline's return on equity.

Mplx has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Plains All American Pipeline. Mplx is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Plains All American Pipeline, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Plains All American Pipeline presently has a consensus price target of $22.64, suggesting a potential upside of 0.19%. Mplx has a consensus price target of $61.60, suggesting a potential upside of 8.96%. Given Mplx's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Mplx is more favorable than Plains All American Pipeline.

In the previous week, Mplx had 12 more articles in the media than Plains All American Pipeline. MarketBeat recorded 14 mentions for Mplx and 2 mentions for Plains All American Pipeline. Mplx's average media sentiment score of 0.35 beat Plains All American Pipeline's score of -0.35 indicating that Mplx is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

41.8% of Plains All American Pipeline shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 69.1% of ONEOK shares are held by institutional investors. 1.1% of Plains All American Pipeline shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.2% of ONEOK shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

ONEOK has a net margin of 10.03% compared to Plains All American Pipeline's net margin of 2.53%. ONEOK's return on equity of 16.06% beat Plains All American Pipeline's return on equity.

Plains All American Pipeline currently has a consensus target price of $22.64, suggesting a potential upside of 0.19%. ONEOK has a consensus target price of $91.88, suggesting a potential upside of 4.09%. Given ONEOK's higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe ONEOK is more favorable than Plains All American Pipeline.

Plains All American Pipeline has a beta of 0.5, meaning that its share price is 50% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, ONEOK has a beta of 0.74, meaning that its share price is 26% less volatile than the broader market.

ONEOK has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Plains All American Pipeline. ONEOK is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Plains All American Pipeline, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

In the previous week, ONEOK had 12 more articles in the media than Plains All American Pipeline. MarketBeat recorded 14 mentions for ONEOK and 2 mentions for Plains All American Pipeline. ONEOK's average media sentiment score of 0.86 beat Plains All American Pipeline's score of -0.35 indicating that ONEOK is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Plains All American Pipeline pays an annual dividend of $1.67 per share and has a dividend yield of 7.4%. ONEOK pays an annual dividend of $4.28 per share and has a dividend yield of 4.8%. Plains All American Pipeline pays out 127.5% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. ONEOK pays out 76.3% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Plains All American Pipeline has increased its dividend for 5 consecutive years and ONEOK has increased its dividend for 3 consecutive years. Plains All American Pipeline is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

Ovintiv presently has a consensus target price of $63.00, suggesting a potential upside of 11.03%. Plains All American Pipeline has a consensus target price of $22.64, suggesting a potential upside of 0.19%. Given Ovintiv's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Ovintiv is more favorable than Plains All American Pipeline.

Ovintiv has a net margin of 8.51% compared to Plains All American Pipeline's net margin of 2.53%. Ovintiv's return on equity of 13.14% beat Plains All American Pipeline's return on equity.

Ovintiv has a beta of 0.53, suggesting that its stock price is 47% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Plains All American Pipeline has a beta of 0.5, suggesting that its stock price is 50% less volatile than the broader market.

Ovintiv pays an annual dividend of $1.20 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.1%. Plains All American Pipeline pays an annual dividend of $1.67 per share and has a dividend yield of 7.4%. Ovintiv pays out 38.7% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Plains All American Pipeline pays out 127.5% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Ovintiv has raised its dividend for 4 consecutive years and Plains All American Pipeline has raised its dividend for 5 consecutive years. Plains All American Pipeline is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

In the previous week, Ovintiv had 3 more articles in the media than Plains All American Pipeline. MarketBeat recorded 5 mentions for Ovintiv and 2 mentions for Plains All American Pipeline. Ovintiv's average media sentiment score of 1.14 beat Plains All American Pipeline's score of -0.35 indicating that Ovintiv is being referred to more favorably in the media.

83.8% of Ovintiv shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 41.8% of Plains All American Pipeline shares are held by institutional investors. 0.9% of Ovintiv shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 1.1% of Plains All American Pipeline shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Plains All American Pipeline has higher revenue and earnings than Ovintiv. Plains All American Pipeline is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Ovintiv, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.