Viking (VIK) Competitors

In the previous week, Viking had 35 more articles in the media than Calamos Strategic Total Return Fund. MarketBeat recorded 36 mentions for Viking and 1 mentions for Calamos Strategic Total Return Fund. Calamos Strategic Total Return Fund's average media sentiment score of 1.89 beat Viking's score of 0.57 indicating that Calamos Strategic Total Return Fund is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Viking has a net margin of 18.00% compared to Calamos Strategic Total Return Fund's net margin of 0.00%. Viking's return on equity of 149.40% beat Calamos Strategic Total Return Fund's return on equity.

Viking currently has a consensus price target of $100.17, suggesting a potential upside of 2.65%. Given Viking's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Viking is more favorable than Calamos Strategic Total Return Fund.

98.8% of Viking shares are owned by institutional investors. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Viking has higher revenue and earnings than Calamos Strategic Total Return Fund.

Marriott International has higher revenue and earnings than Viking. Viking is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Marriott International, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Marriott International currently has a consensus target price of $384.73, indicating a potential upside of 5.93%. Viking has a consensus target price of $100.17, indicating a potential upside of 2.65%. Given Marriott International's higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Marriott International is more favorable than Viking.

In the previous week, Viking had 12 more articles in the media than Marriott International. MarketBeat recorded 36 mentions for Viking and 24 mentions for Marriott International. Marriott International's average media sentiment score of 0.62 beat Viking's score of 0.57 indicating that Marriott International is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Marriott International has a beta of 1.11, suggesting that its stock price is 11% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Viking has a beta of 1.48, suggesting that its stock price is 48% more volatile than the broader market.

Viking has a net margin of 18.00% compared to Marriott International's net margin of 9.72%. Viking's return on equity of 149.40% beat Marriott International's return on equity.

70.7% of Marriott International shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 98.8% of Viking shares are held by institutional investors. 11.4% of Marriott International shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

69.7% of United Airlines shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 98.8% of Viking shares are held by institutional investors. 0.9% of United Airlines shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

United Airlines has higher revenue and earnings than Viking. United Airlines is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Viking, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

United Airlines currently has a consensus target price of $151.62, suggesting a potential upside of 25.98%. Viking has a consensus target price of $100.17, suggesting a potential upside of 2.65%. Given United Airlines' stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, equities analysts plainly believe United Airlines is more favorable than Viking.

In the previous week, Viking had 8 more articles in the media than United Airlines. MarketBeat recorded 36 mentions for Viking and 28 mentions for United Airlines. United Airlines' average media sentiment score of 0.80 beat Viking's score of 0.57 indicating that United Airlines is being referred to more favorably in the media.

United Airlines has a beta of 1.25, meaning that its stock price is 25% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Viking has a beta of 1.48, meaning that its stock price is 48% more volatile than the broader market.

Viking has a net margin of 18.00% compared to United Airlines' net margin of 6.06%. Viking's return on equity of 149.40% beat United Airlines' return on equity.

Viking has a beta of 1.48, meaning that its stock price is 48% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Carnival has a beta of 2.32, meaning that its stock price is 132% more volatile than the broader market.

98.8% of Viking shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 67.2% of Carnival shares are held by institutional investors. 7.9% of Carnival shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

In the previous week, Carnival had 3 more articles in the media than Viking. MarketBeat recorded 39 mentions for Carnival and 36 mentions for Viking. Viking's average media sentiment score of 0.57 beat Carnival's score of 0.46 indicating that Viking is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Viking has a net margin of 18.00% compared to Carnival's net margin of 11.24%. Viking's return on equity of 149.40% beat Carnival's return on equity.

Viking presently has a consensus target price of $100.17, indicating a potential upside of 2.65%. Carnival has a consensus target price of $34.99, indicating a potential upside of 32.08%. Given Carnival's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Carnival is more favorable than Viking.

Carnival has higher revenue and earnings than Viking. Carnival is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Viking, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.