Viking (VIK) Competitors

98.8% of Viking shares are owned by institutional investors. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Viking has higher revenue and earnings than Calamos Strategic Total Return Fund.

In the previous week, Viking had 24 more articles in the media than Calamos Strategic Total Return Fund. MarketBeat recorded 24 mentions for Viking and 0 mentions for Calamos Strategic Total Return Fund. Viking's average media sentiment score of 0.39 beat Calamos Strategic Total Return Fund's score of 0.00 indicating that Viking is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Viking has a net margin of 19.33% compared to Calamos Strategic Total Return Fund's net margin of 0.00%. Viking's return on equity of 117.98% beat Calamos Strategic Total Return Fund's return on equity.

Viking currently has a consensus target price of $107.50, indicating a potential upside of 17.38%. Given Viking's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, research analysts clearly believe Viking is more favorable than Calamos Strategic Total Return Fund.

Marriott International has higher revenue and earnings than Viking. Viking is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Marriott International, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Marriott International has a beta of 1.1, indicating that its share price is 10% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Viking has a beta of 1.5, indicating that its share price is 50% more volatile than the broader market.

70.7% of Marriott International shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 98.8% of Viking shares are held by institutional investors. 11.4% of Marriott International shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

In the previous week, Marriott International had 9 more articles in the media than Viking. MarketBeat recorded 33 mentions for Marriott International and 24 mentions for Viking. Marriott International's average media sentiment score of 0.64 beat Viking's score of 0.39 indicating that Marriott International is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Viking has a net margin of 19.33% compared to Marriott International's net margin of 9.62%. Viking's return on equity of 117.98% beat Marriott International's return on equity.

Marriott International currently has a consensus target price of $385.65, indicating a potential upside of 7.06%. Viking has a consensus target price of $107.50, indicating a potential upside of 17.38%. Given Viking's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Viking is more favorable than Marriott International.

Viking has a net margin of 19.33% compared to United Airlines' net margin of 5.56%. Viking's return on equity of 117.98% beat United Airlines' return on equity.

United Airlines has higher revenue and earnings than Viking. United Airlines is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Viking, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

98.8% of Viking shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 69.7% of United Airlines shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.9% of United Airlines shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Viking has a beta of 1.5, meaning that its stock price is 50% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, United Airlines has a beta of 1.28, meaning that its stock price is 28% more volatile than the broader market.

Viking presently has a consensus target price of $107.50, indicating a potential upside of 17.38%. United Airlines has a consensus target price of $157.74, indicating a potential upside of 38.89%. Given United Airlines' stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe United Airlines is more favorable than Viking.

In the previous week, United Airlines had 12 more articles in the media than Viking. MarketBeat recorded 36 mentions for United Airlines and 24 mentions for Viking. United Airlines' average media sentiment score of 1.50 beat Viking's score of 0.39 indicating that United Airlines is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

In the previous week, Viking had 13 more articles in the media than Carnival. MarketBeat recorded 24 mentions for Viking and 11 mentions for Carnival. Viking's average media sentiment score of 0.39 beat Carnival's score of 0.18 indicating that Viking is being referred to more favorably in the media.

98.8% of Viking shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 67.2% of Carnival shares are owned by institutional investors. 7.9% of Carnival shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Viking presently has a consensus target price of $107.50, suggesting a potential upside of 17.38%. Carnival has a consensus target price of $35.08, suggesting a potential upside of 36.53%. Given Carnival's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Carnival is more favorable than Viking.

Viking has a net margin of 19.33% compared to Carnival's net margin of 11.24%. Viking's return on equity of 117.98% beat Carnival's return on equity.

Carnival has higher revenue and earnings than Viking. Carnival is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Viking, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Viking has a beta of 1.5, indicating that its stock price is 50% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Carnival has a beta of 2.35, indicating that its stock price is 135% more volatile than the broader market.