Plains All American Pipeline (PAA) Competitors

Enterprise Products Partners has higher revenue and earnings than Plains All American Pipeline. Enterprise Products Partners is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Plains All American Pipeline, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Enterprise Products Partners pays an annual dividend of $2.20 per share and has a dividend yield of 5.6%. Plains All American Pipeline pays an annual dividend of $1.67 per share and has a dividend yield of 6.9%. Enterprise Products Partners pays out 81.5% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Plains All American Pipeline pays out 127.5% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Enterprise Products Partners has raised its dividend for 28 consecutive years and Plains All American Pipeline has raised its dividend for 5 consecutive years.

Enterprise Products Partners has a net margin of 11.45% compared to Plains All American Pipeline's net margin of 2.53%. Enterprise Products Partners' return on equity of 19.53% beat Plains All American Pipeline's return on equity.

Enterprise Products Partners has a beta of 0.52, indicating that its stock price is 48% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Plains All American Pipeline has a beta of 0.51, indicating that its stock price is 49% less volatile than the broader market.

Enterprise Products Partners presently has a consensus price target of $39.67, indicating a potential upside of 0.53%. Plains All American Pipeline has a consensus price target of $22.54, indicating a potential downside of 6.89%. Given Enterprise Products Partners' stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, equities research analysts plainly believe Enterprise Products Partners is more favorable than Plains All American Pipeline.

26.1% of Enterprise Products Partners shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 41.8% of Plains All American Pipeline shares are held by institutional investors. 32.6% of Enterprise Products Partners shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 1.1% of Plains All American Pipeline shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

In the previous week, Enterprise Products Partners had 19 more articles in the media than Plains All American Pipeline. MarketBeat recorded 21 mentions for Enterprise Products Partners and 2 mentions for Plains All American Pipeline. Enterprise Products Partners' average media sentiment score of 1.09 beat Plains All American Pipeline's score of 0.07 indicating that Enterprise Products Partners is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Energy Transfer has a beta of 0.57, meaning that its share price is 43% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Plains All American Pipeline has a beta of 0.51, meaning that its share price is 49% less volatile than the broader market.

Energy Transfer pays an annual dividend of $1.35 per share and has a dividend yield of 6.8%. Plains All American Pipeline pays an annual dividend of $1.67 per share and has a dividend yield of 6.9%. Energy Transfer pays out 112.5% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Plains All American Pipeline pays out 127.5% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Energy Transfer has increased its dividend for 4 consecutive years and Plains All American Pipeline has increased its dividend for 5 consecutive years. Plains All American Pipeline is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

Energy Transfer has higher revenue and earnings than Plains All American Pipeline. Energy Transfer is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Plains All American Pipeline, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

In the previous week, Energy Transfer had 21 more articles in the media than Plains All American Pipeline. MarketBeat recorded 23 mentions for Energy Transfer and 2 mentions for Plains All American Pipeline. Energy Transfer's average media sentiment score of 0.74 beat Plains All American Pipeline's score of 0.07 indicating that Energy Transfer is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Energy Transfer presently has a consensus target price of $22.73, indicating a potential upside of 13.71%. Plains All American Pipeline has a consensus target price of $22.54, indicating a potential downside of 6.89%. Given Energy Transfer's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, equities research analysts plainly believe Energy Transfer is more favorable than Plains All American Pipeline.

38.2% of Energy Transfer shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 41.8% of Plains All American Pipeline shares are owned by institutional investors. 3.3% of Energy Transfer shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 1.1% of Plains All American Pipeline shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Energy Transfer has a net margin of 4.66% compared to Plains All American Pipeline's net margin of 2.53%. Plains All American Pipeline's return on equity of 12.17% beat Energy Transfer's return on equity.

ONEOK has a net margin of 10.03% compared to Plains All American Pipeline's net margin of 2.53%. ONEOK's return on equity of 16.06% beat Plains All American Pipeline's return on equity.

ONEOK presently has a consensus price target of $91.88, indicating a potential downside of 2.21%. Plains All American Pipeline has a consensus price target of $22.54, indicating a potential downside of 6.89%. Given ONEOK's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, research analysts clearly believe ONEOK is more favorable than Plains All American Pipeline.

In the previous week, ONEOK and ONEOK both had 2 articles in the media. ONEOK's average media sentiment score of 0.42 beat Plains All American Pipeline's score of 0.07 indicating that ONEOK is being referred to more favorably in the media.

ONEOK has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Plains All American Pipeline. ONEOK is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Plains All American Pipeline, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

ONEOK has a beta of 0.78, indicating that its stock price is 22% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Plains All American Pipeline has a beta of 0.51, indicating that its stock price is 49% less volatile than the broader market.

ONEOK pays an annual dividend of $4.28 per share and has a dividend yield of 4.6%. Plains All American Pipeline pays an annual dividend of $1.67 per share and has a dividend yield of 6.9%. ONEOK pays out 76.3% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Plains All American Pipeline pays out 127.5% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. ONEOK has raised its dividend for 3 consecutive years and Plains All American Pipeline has raised its dividend for 5 consecutive years. Plains All American Pipeline is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

69.1% of ONEOK shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 41.8% of Plains All American Pipeline shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.2% of ONEOK shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 1.1% of Plains All American Pipeline shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Plains All American Pipeline has higher revenue and earnings than Ovintiv. Plains All American Pipeline is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Ovintiv, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Ovintiv has a net margin of 8.51% compared to Plains All American Pipeline's net margin of 2.53%. Ovintiv's return on equity of 13.14% beat Plains All American Pipeline's return on equity.

Plains All American Pipeline pays an annual dividend of $1.67 per share and has a dividend yield of 6.9%. Ovintiv pays an annual dividend of $1.20 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.0%. Plains All American Pipeline pays out 127.5% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Ovintiv pays out 38.7% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Plains All American Pipeline has raised its dividend for 5 consecutive years and Ovintiv has raised its dividend for 4 consecutive years. Plains All American Pipeline is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

41.8% of Plains All American Pipeline shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 83.8% of Ovintiv shares are owned by institutional investors. 1.1% of Plains All American Pipeline shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 0.9% of Ovintiv shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Plains All American Pipeline has a beta of 0.51, suggesting that its stock price is 49% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Ovintiv has a beta of 0.57, suggesting that its stock price is 43% less volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, Ovintiv had 7 more articles in the media than Plains All American Pipeline. MarketBeat recorded 9 mentions for Ovintiv and 2 mentions for Plains All American Pipeline. Ovintiv's average media sentiment score of 0.97 beat Plains All American Pipeline's score of 0.07 indicating that Ovintiv is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Plains All American Pipeline presently has a consensus target price of $22.54, indicating a potential downside of 6.89%. Ovintiv has a consensus target price of $62.32, indicating a potential upside of 6.26%. Given Ovintiv's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Ovintiv is more favorable than Plains All American Pipeline.