Plains All American Pipeline (PAA) Competitors

38.2% of Energy Transfer shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 41.8% of Plains All American Pipeline shares are owned by institutional investors. 3.3% of Energy Transfer shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 1.1% of Plains All American Pipeline shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Energy Transfer has a beta of 0.55, indicating that its stock price is 45% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Plains All American Pipeline has a beta of 0.5, indicating that its stock price is 50% less volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, Energy Transfer had 11 more articles in the media than Plains All American Pipeline. MarketBeat recorded 15 mentions for Energy Transfer and 4 mentions for Plains All American Pipeline. Plains All American Pipeline's average media sentiment score of 1.63 beat Energy Transfer's score of 1.01 indicating that Plains All American Pipeline is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Energy Transfer presently has a consensus target price of $23.45, indicating a potential upside of 24.74%. Plains All American Pipeline has a consensus target price of $22.93, indicating a potential upside of 2.00%. Given Energy Transfer's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Energy Transfer is more favorable than Plains All American Pipeline.

Energy Transfer has a net margin of 4.66% compared to Plains All American Pipeline's net margin of 2.53%. Plains All American Pipeline's return on equity of 12.17% beat Energy Transfer's return on equity.

Energy Transfer has higher revenue and earnings than Plains All American Pipeline. Energy Transfer is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Plains All American Pipeline, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Energy Transfer pays an annual dividend of $1.35 per share and has a dividend yield of 7.2%. Plains All American Pipeline pays an annual dividend of $1.67 per share and has a dividend yield of 7.4%. Energy Transfer pays out 112.5% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Plains All American Pipeline pays out 127.5% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Energy Transfer has increased its dividend for 4 consecutive years and Plains All American Pipeline has increased its dividend for 5 consecutive years. Plains All American Pipeline is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

In the previous week, Magnolia Oil & Gas had 11 more articles in the media than Plains All American Pipeline. MarketBeat recorded 15 mentions for Magnolia Oil & Gas and 4 mentions for Plains All American Pipeline. Plains All American Pipeline's average media sentiment score of 1.63 beat Magnolia Oil & Gas' score of 0.70 indicating that Plains All American Pipeline is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Plains All American Pipeline presently has a consensus price target of $22.93, suggesting a potential upside of 2.00%. Magnolia Oil & Gas has a consensus price target of $31.42, suggesting a potential upside of 15.15%. Given Magnolia Oil & Gas' higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Magnolia Oil & Gas is more favorable than Plains All American Pipeline.

Plains All American Pipeline has a beta of 0.5, suggesting that its share price is 50% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Magnolia Oil & Gas has a beta of 0.71, suggesting that its share price is 29% less volatile than the broader market.

Magnolia Oil & Gas has a net margin of 24.40% compared to Plains All American Pipeline's net margin of 2.53%. Magnolia Oil & Gas' return on equity of 16.28% beat Plains All American Pipeline's return on equity.

Plains All American Pipeline pays an annual dividend of $1.67 per share and has a dividend yield of 7.4%. Magnolia Oil & Gas pays an annual dividend of $0.66 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.4%. Plains All American Pipeline pays out 127.5% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Magnolia Oil & Gas pays out 38.4% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Plains All American Pipeline has raised its dividend for 5 consecutive years and Magnolia Oil & Gas has raised its dividend for 3 consecutive years. Plains All American Pipeline is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

Plains All American Pipeline has higher revenue and earnings than Magnolia Oil & Gas. Magnolia Oil & Gas is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Plains All American Pipeline, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

41.8% of Plains All American Pipeline shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 94.7% of Magnolia Oil & Gas shares are owned by institutional investors. 1.1% of Plains All American Pipeline shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.9% of Magnolia Oil & Gas shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

ONEOK currently has a consensus price target of $91.88, suggesting a potential upside of 2.97%. Plains All American Pipeline has a consensus price target of $22.93, suggesting a potential upside of 2.00%. Given ONEOK's higher probable upside, equities research analysts clearly believe ONEOK is more favorable than Plains All American Pipeline.

ONEOK has a net margin of 10.03% compared to Plains All American Pipeline's net margin of 2.53%. ONEOK's return on equity of 16.06% beat Plains All American Pipeline's return on equity.

ONEOK pays an annual dividend of $4.28 per share and has a dividend yield of 4.8%. Plains All American Pipeline pays an annual dividend of $1.67 per share and has a dividend yield of 7.4%. ONEOK pays out 76.3% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Plains All American Pipeline pays out 127.5% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. ONEOK has increased its dividend for 3 consecutive years and Plains All American Pipeline has increased its dividend for 5 consecutive years. Plains All American Pipeline is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

69.1% of ONEOK shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 41.8% of Plains All American Pipeline shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.2% of ONEOK shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 1.1% of Plains All American Pipeline shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

ONEOK has a beta of 0.74, meaning that its stock price is 26% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Plains All American Pipeline has a beta of 0.5, meaning that its stock price is 50% less volatile than the broader market.

ONEOK has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Plains All American Pipeline. ONEOK is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Plains All American Pipeline, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

In the previous week, ONEOK had 2 more articles in the media than Plains All American Pipeline. MarketBeat recorded 6 mentions for ONEOK and 4 mentions for Plains All American Pipeline. Plains All American Pipeline's average media sentiment score of 1.63 beat ONEOK's score of 0.93 indicating that Plains All American Pipeline is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

83.8% of Ovintiv shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 41.8% of Plains All American Pipeline shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.9% of Ovintiv shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 1.1% of Plains All American Pipeline shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Ovintiv has a net margin of 8.51% compared to Plains All American Pipeline's net margin of 2.53%. Ovintiv's return on equity of 13.14% beat Plains All American Pipeline's return on equity.

Ovintiv has a beta of 0.53, meaning that its stock price is 47% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Plains All American Pipeline has a beta of 0.5, meaning that its stock price is 50% less volatile than the broader market.

Plains All American Pipeline has higher revenue and earnings than Ovintiv. Plains All American Pipeline is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Ovintiv, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Ovintiv pays an annual dividend of $1.20 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.1%. Plains All American Pipeline pays an annual dividend of $1.67 per share and has a dividend yield of 7.4%. Ovintiv pays out 38.7% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Plains All American Pipeline pays out 127.5% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Ovintiv has increased its dividend for 4 consecutive years and Plains All American Pipeline has increased its dividend for 5 consecutive years. Plains All American Pipeline is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

In the previous week, Ovintiv and Ovintiv both had 4 articles in the media. Plains All American Pipeline's average media sentiment score of 1.63 beat Ovintiv's score of 0.17 indicating that Plains All American Pipeline is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Ovintiv presently has a consensus price target of $63.00, suggesting a potential upside of 11.46%. Plains All American Pipeline has a consensus price target of $22.93, suggesting a potential upside of 2.00%. Given Ovintiv's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, equities research analysts plainly believe Ovintiv is more favorable than Plains All American Pipeline.