Williams Companies (WMB) Competitors

Enterprise Products Partners has a beta of 0.49, suggesting that its stock price is 51% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Williams Companies has a beta of 0.58, suggesting that its stock price is 42% less volatile than the broader market.

Williams Companies has a net margin of 23.39% compared to Enterprise Products Partners' net margin of 11.45%. Enterprise Products Partners' return on equity of 19.53% beat Williams Companies' return on equity.

Enterprise Products Partners pays an annual dividend of $2.20 per share and has a dividend yield of 5.8%. Williams Companies pays an annual dividend of $2.10 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.9%. Enterprise Products Partners pays out 81.5% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Williams Companies pays out 92.1% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Enterprise Products Partners has increased its dividend for 28 consecutive years and Williams Companies has increased its dividend for 9 consecutive years. Enterprise Products Partners is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

Enterprise Products Partners has higher revenue and earnings than Williams Companies. Enterprise Products Partners is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Williams Companies, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Enterprise Products Partners currently has a consensus target price of $39.67, suggesting a potential upside of 4.00%. Williams Companies has a consensus target price of $82.40, suggesting a potential upside of 13.83%. Given Williams Companies' stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Williams Companies is more favorable than Enterprise Products Partners.

26.1% of Enterprise Products Partners shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 86.4% of Williams Companies shares are held by institutional investors. 32.6% of Enterprise Products Partners shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 0.5% of Williams Companies shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

In the previous week, Williams Companies had 16 more articles in the media than Enterprise Products Partners. MarketBeat recorded 42 mentions for Williams Companies and 26 mentions for Enterprise Products Partners. Enterprise Products Partners' average media sentiment score of 1.03 beat Williams Companies' score of 0.96 indicating that Enterprise Products Partners is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Energy Transfer pays an annual dividend of $1.35 per share and has a dividend yield of 6.9%. Williams Companies pays an annual dividend of $2.10 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.9%. Energy Transfer pays out 112.5% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Williams Companies pays out 92.1% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Energy Transfer has raised its dividend for 4 consecutive years and Williams Companies has raised its dividend for 9 consecutive years.

Energy Transfer presently has a consensus target price of $23.45, indicating a potential upside of 19.48%. Williams Companies has a consensus target price of $82.40, indicating a potential upside of 13.83%. Given Energy Transfer's higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Energy Transfer is more favorable than Williams Companies.

Williams Companies has a net margin of 23.39% compared to Energy Transfer's net margin of 4.66%. Williams Companies' return on equity of 18.34% beat Energy Transfer's return on equity.

38.2% of Energy Transfer shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 86.4% of Williams Companies shares are owned by institutional investors. 3.3% of Energy Transfer shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 0.5% of Williams Companies shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Energy Transfer has higher revenue and earnings than Williams Companies. Energy Transfer is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Williams Companies, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

In the previous week, Williams Companies had 16 more articles in the media than Energy Transfer. MarketBeat recorded 42 mentions for Williams Companies and 26 mentions for Energy Transfer. Energy Transfer's average media sentiment score of 1.31 beat Williams Companies' score of 0.96 indicating that Energy Transfer is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Energy Transfer has a beta of 0.55, suggesting that its share price is 45% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Williams Companies has a beta of 0.58, suggesting that its share price is 42% less volatile than the broader market.

62.5% of Kinder Morgan shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 86.4% of Williams Companies shares are held by institutional investors. 12.7% of Kinder Morgan shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.5% of Williams Companies shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Kinder Morgan presently has a consensus price target of $34.20, indicating a potential upside of 7.41%. Williams Companies has a consensus price target of $82.40, indicating a potential upside of 13.83%. Given Williams Companies' stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Williams Companies is more favorable than Kinder Morgan.

Kinder Morgan pays an annual dividend of $1.19 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.7%. Williams Companies pays an annual dividend of $2.10 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.9%. Kinder Morgan pays out 79.9% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Williams Companies pays out 92.1% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Kinder Morgan has increased its dividend for 9 consecutive years and Williams Companies has increased its dividend for 9 consecutive years. Kinder Morgan is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

Williams Companies has a net margin of 23.39% compared to Kinder Morgan's net margin of 18.92%. Williams Companies' return on equity of 18.34% beat Kinder Morgan's return on equity.

Kinder Morgan has higher revenue and earnings than Williams Companies. Kinder Morgan is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Williams Companies, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Kinder Morgan has a beta of 0.54, suggesting that its share price is 46% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Williams Companies has a beta of 0.58, suggesting that its share price is 42% less volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, Williams Companies had 10 more articles in the media than Kinder Morgan. MarketBeat recorded 42 mentions for Williams Companies and 32 mentions for Kinder Morgan. Kinder Morgan's average media sentiment score of 1.25 beat Williams Companies' score of 0.96 indicating that Kinder Morgan is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Williams Companies has a net margin of 23.39% compared to Liberty Energy's net margin of 3.71%. Williams Companies' return on equity of 18.34% beat Liberty Energy's return on equity.

Williams Companies has higher revenue and earnings than Liberty Energy. Williams Companies is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Liberty Energy, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Williams Companies presently has a consensus target price of $82.40, suggesting a potential upside of 13.83%. Liberty Energy has a consensus target price of $30.42, suggesting a potential downside of 3.44%. Given Williams Companies' stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, research analysts clearly believe Williams Companies is more favorable than Liberty Energy.

In the previous week, Williams Companies had 32 more articles in the media than Liberty Energy. MarketBeat recorded 42 mentions for Williams Companies and 10 mentions for Liberty Energy. Liberty Energy's average media sentiment score of 1.20 beat Williams Companies' score of 0.96 indicating that Liberty Energy is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Williams Companies has a beta of 0.58, meaning that its share price is 42% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Liberty Energy has a beta of 0.51, meaning that its share price is 49% less volatile than the broader market.

Williams Companies pays an annual dividend of $2.10 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.9%. Liberty Energy pays an annual dividend of $0.36 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.1%. Williams Companies pays out 92.1% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Liberty Energy pays out 39.6% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Williams Companies has raised its dividend for 9 consecutive years and Liberty Energy has raised its dividend for 2 consecutive years. Williams Companies is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

86.4% of Williams Companies shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 98.2% of Liberty Energy shares are held by institutional investors. 0.5% of Williams Companies shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 2.0% of Liberty Energy shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.