SFL (SFL) Competitors

SFL pays an annual dividend of $0.88 per share and has a dividend yield of 7.1%. International Seaways pays an annual dividend of $0.48 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.5%. SFL pays out 366.7% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. International Seaways pays out 3.1% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. SFL has raised its dividend for 1 consecutive years. SFL is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

International Seaways has higher revenue and earnings than SFL. International Seaways is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than SFL, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

SFL currently has a consensus price target of $14.00, suggesting a potential upside of 13.67%. International Seaways has a consensus price target of $88.00, suggesting a potential downside of 9.20%. Given SFL's higher possible upside, research analysts plainly believe SFL is more favorable than International Seaways.

28.6% of SFL shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 67.3% of International Seaways shares are owned by institutional investors. 1.7% of International Seaways shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

International Seaways has a net margin of 61.98% compared to SFL's net margin of 4.37%. International Seaways' return on equity of 31.75% beat SFL's return on equity.

SFL has a beta of 0.43, meaning that its share price is 57% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, International Seaways has a beta of -0.13, meaning that its share price is 113% less volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, International Seaways had 11 more articles in the media than SFL. MarketBeat recorded 14 mentions for International Seaways and 3 mentions for SFL. International Seaways' average media sentiment score of 0.77 beat SFL's score of 0.19 indicating that International Seaways is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

3.6% of Ultrapar Participacoes shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 28.6% of SFL shares are held by institutional investors. 1.8% of Ultrapar Participacoes shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Ultrapar Participacoes pays an annual dividend of $0.21 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.4%. SFL pays an annual dividend of $0.88 per share and has a dividend yield of 7.1%. Ultrapar Participacoes pays out 34.4% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. SFL pays out 366.7% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. SFL has raised its dividend for 1 consecutive years. SFL is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

Ultrapar Participacoes presently has a consensus price target of $6.32, indicating a potential upside of 2.50%. SFL has a consensus price target of $14.00, indicating a potential upside of 13.67%. Given SFL's higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe SFL is more favorable than Ultrapar Participacoes.

SFL has a net margin of 4.37% compared to Ultrapar Participacoes' net margin of 2.28%. Ultrapar Participacoes' return on equity of 19.66% beat SFL's return on equity.

Ultrapar Participacoes has a beta of 0.7, indicating that its share price is 30% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, SFL has a beta of 0.43, indicating that its share price is 57% less volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, Ultrapar Participacoes had 8 more articles in the media than SFL. MarketBeat recorded 11 mentions for Ultrapar Participacoes and 3 mentions for SFL. Ultrapar Participacoes' average media sentiment score of 0.52 beat SFL's score of 0.19 indicating that Ultrapar Participacoes is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Ultrapar Participacoes has higher revenue and earnings than SFL. Ultrapar Participacoes is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than SFL, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

SFL pays an annual dividend of $0.88 per share and has a dividend yield of 7.1%. Golar LNG pays an annual dividend of $1.00 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.9%. SFL pays out 366.7% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Golar LNG pays out 62.5% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. SFL has raised its dividend for 1 consecutive years and Golar LNG has raised its dividend for 2 consecutive years.

Golar LNG has a net margin of 31.27% compared to SFL's net margin of 4.37%. Golar LNG's return on equity of 8.92% beat SFL's return on equity.

28.6% of SFL shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 92.2% of Golar LNG shares are held by institutional investors. 0.0% of Golar LNG shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

In the previous week, Golar LNG had 14 more articles in the media than SFL. MarketBeat recorded 17 mentions for Golar LNG and 3 mentions for SFL. Golar LNG's average media sentiment score of 0.60 beat SFL's score of 0.19 indicating that Golar LNG is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

SFL has a beta of 0.43, indicating that its stock price is 57% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Golar LNG has a beta of 0.05, indicating that its stock price is 95% less volatile than the broader market.

SFL currently has a consensus price target of $14.00, suggesting a potential upside of 13.67%. Golar LNG has a consensus price target of $59.30, suggesting a potential upside of 12.97%. Given SFL's higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe SFL is more favorable than Golar LNG.

Golar LNG has lower revenue, but higher earnings than SFL. Golar LNG is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than SFL, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

In the previous week, SFL had 2 more articles in the media than Plains GP. MarketBeat recorded 3 mentions for SFL and 1 mentions for Plains GP. Plains GP's average media sentiment score of 1.54 beat SFL's score of 0.19 indicating that Plains GP is being referred to more favorably in the media.

88.3% of Plains GP shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 28.6% of SFL shares are held by institutional investors. 6.9% of Plains GP shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Plains GP pays an annual dividend of $1.67 per share and has a dividend yield of 6.5%. SFL pays an annual dividend of $0.88 per share and has a dividend yield of 7.1%. Plains GP pays out 59.9% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. SFL pays out 366.7% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. SFL has raised its dividend for 1 consecutive years. SFL is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

Plains GP has higher revenue and earnings than SFL. Plains GP is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than SFL, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Plains GP has a beta of 0.46, suggesting that its share price is 54% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, SFL has a beta of 0.43, suggesting that its share price is 57% less volatile than the broader market.

Plains GP presently has a consensus price target of $23.36, indicating a potential downside of 9.58%. SFL has a consensus price target of $14.00, indicating a potential upside of 13.67%. Given SFL's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe SFL is more favorable than Plains GP.

SFL has a net margin of 4.37% compared to Plains GP's net margin of 0.21%. Plains GP's return on equity of 0.70% beat SFL's return on equity.