SFL (SFL) Competitors

International Seaways has a net margin of 61.98% compared to SFL's net margin of 8.76%. International Seaways' return on equity of 31.75% beat SFL's return on equity.

67.3% of International Seaways shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 28.6% of SFL shares are owned by institutional investors. 1.7% of International Seaways shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

In the previous week, International Seaways had 3 more articles in the media than SFL. MarketBeat recorded 7 mentions for International Seaways and 4 mentions for SFL. International Seaways' average media sentiment score of 0.33 beat SFL's score of 0.18 indicating that International Seaways is being referred to more favorably in the media.

International Seaways presently has a consensus price target of $102.25, indicating a potential downside of 3.34%. SFL has a consensus price target of $14.00, indicating a potential upside of 9.16%. Given SFL's higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe SFL is more favorable than International Seaways.

International Seaways pays an annual dividend of $20.20 per share and has a dividend yield of 19.1%. SFL pays an annual dividend of $0.88 per share and has a dividend yield of 6.9%. International Seaways pays out 129.2% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. SFL pays out 183.3% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. SFL has raised its dividend for 1 consecutive years. International Seaways is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

International Seaways has higher revenue and earnings than SFL. International Seaways is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than SFL, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

International Seaways has a beta of -0.13, meaning that its share price is 113% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, SFL has a beta of 0.4, meaning that its share price is 60% less volatile than the broader market.

South Bow has a net margin of 22.99% compared to SFL's net margin of 8.76%. South Bow's return on equity of 15.84% beat SFL's return on equity.

South Bow pays an annual dividend of $2.00 per share and has a dividend yield of 5.9%. SFL pays an annual dividend of $0.88 per share and has a dividend yield of 6.9%. South Bow pays out 90.5% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. SFL pays out 183.3% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. SFL has raised its dividend for 1 consecutive years. SFL is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

28.6% of SFL shares are held by institutional investors. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

South Bow has a beta of 0.14, suggesting that its share price is 86% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, SFL has a beta of 0.4, suggesting that its share price is 60% less volatile than the broader market.

South Bow has higher revenue and earnings than SFL. South Bow is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than SFL, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

South Bow currently has a consensus price target of $33.00, indicating a potential downside of 3.00%. SFL has a consensus price target of $14.00, indicating a potential upside of 9.16%. Given SFL's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe SFL is more favorable than South Bow.

In the previous week, SFL had 3 more articles in the media than South Bow. MarketBeat recorded 4 mentions for SFL and 1 mentions for South Bow. South Bow's average media sentiment score of 0.48 beat SFL's score of 0.18 indicating that South Bow is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Plains GP has a beta of 0.48, meaning that its stock price is 52% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, SFL has a beta of 0.4, meaning that its stock price is 60% less volatile than the broader market.

88.3% of Plains GP shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 28.6% of SFL shares are held by institutional investors. 6.9% of Plains GP shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Plains GP has higher revenue and earnings than SFL. Plains GP is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than SFL, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

In the previous week, Plains GP had 3 more articles in the media than SFL. MarketBeat recorded 7 mentions for Plains GP and 4 mentions for SFL. Plains GP's average media sentiment score of 0.95 beat SFL's score of 0.18 indicating that Plains GP is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Plains GP pays an annual dividend of $1.67 per share and has a dividend yield of 6.3%. SFL pays an annual dividend of $0.88 per share and has a dividend yield of 6.9%. Plains GP pays out 59.9% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. SFL pays out 183.3% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. SFL has raised its dividend for 1 consecutive years. SFL is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

Plains GP presently has a consensus price target of $24.91, suggesting a potential downside of 6.29%. SFL has a consensus price target of $14.00, suggesting a potential upside of 9.16%. Given SFL's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe SFL is more favorable than Plains GP.

SFL has a net margin of 8.76% compared to Plains GP's net margin of 0.21%. SFL's return on equity of 3.41% beat Plains GP's return on equity.

Golar LNG has a net margin of 31.27% compared to SFL's net margin of 8.76%. Golar LNG's return on equity of 8.91% beat SFL's return on equity.

SFL presently has a consensus price target of $14.00, indicating a potential upside of 9.16%. Golar LNG has a consensus price target of $64.25, indicating a potential upside of 29.51%. Given Golar LNG's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Golar LNG is more favorable than SFL.

In the previous week, Golar LNG had 7 more articles in the media than SFL. MarketBeat recorded 11 mentions for Golar LNG and 4 mentions for SFL. Golar LNG's average media sentiment score of 0.37 beat SFL's score of 0.18 indicating that Golar LNG is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

SFL pays an annual dividend of $0.88 per share and has a dividend yield of 6.9%. Golar LNG pays an annual dividend of $1.00 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.0%. SFL pays out 183.3% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Golar LNG pays out 62.5% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. SFL has increased its dividend for 1 consecutive years and Golar LNG has increased its dividend for 2 consecutive years.

28.6% of SFL shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 92.2% of Golar LNG shares are held by institutional investors. 0.0% of Golar LNG shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Golar LNG has lower revenue, but higher earnings than SFL. SFL is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Golar LNG, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

SFL has a beta of 0.4, meaning that its share price is 60% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Golar LNG has a beta of 0.05, meaning that its share price is 95% less volatile than the broader market.