SFL (SFL) Competitors

International Seaways currently has a consensus price target of $94.75, suggesting a potential downside of 9.12%. SFL has a consensus price target of $14.00, suggesting a potential upside of 8.95%. Given SFL's higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe SFL is more favorable than International Seaways.

International Seaways pays an annual dividend of $20.20 per share and has a dividend yield of 19.4%. SFL pays an annual dividend of $0.88 per share and has a dividend yield of 6.8%. International Seaways pays out 129.2% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. SFL pays out 183.3% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. SFL has raised its dividend for 1 consecutive years. International Seaways is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

67.3% of International Seaways shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 28.6% of SFL shares are owned by institutional investors. 1.7% of International Seaways shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

International Seaways has a net margin of 61.98% compared to SFL's net margin of 8.76%. International Seaways' return on equity of 31.75% beat SFL's return on equity.

In the previous week, International Seaways had 12 more articles in the media than SFL. MarketBeat recorded 14 mentions for International Seaways and 2 mentions for SFL. International Seaways' average media sentiment score of 1.33 beat SFL's score of -0.07 indicating that International Seaways is being referred to more favorably in the media.

International Seaways has higher revenue and earnings than SFL. International Seaways is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than SFL, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

International Seaways has a beta of -0.13, suggesting that its share price is 113% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, SFL has a beta of 0.4, suggesting that its share price is 60% less volatile than the broader market.

Plains GP has higher revenue and earnings than SFL. Plains GP is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than SFL, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Plains GP has a beta of 0.48, indicating that its share price is 52% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, SFL has a beta of 0.4, indicating that its share price is 60% less volatile than the broader market.

SFL has a net margin of 8.76% compared to Plains GP's net margin of 0.21%. SFL's return on equity of 3.41% beat Plains GP's return on equity.

In the previous week, Plains GP had 6 more articles in the media than SFL. MarketBeat recorded 8 mentions for Plains GP and 2 mentions for SFL. Plains GP's average media sentiment score of 1.27 beat SFL's score of -0.07 indicating that Plains GP is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Plains GP pays an annual dividend of $1.67 per share and has a dividend yield of 6.0%. SFL pays an annual dividend of $0.88 per share and has a dividend yield of 6.8%. Plains GP pays out 59.9% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. SFL pays out 183.3% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. SFL has increased its dividend for 1 consecutive years. SFL is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

Plains GP presently has a consensus target price of $24.18, suggesting a potential downside of 13.30%. SFL has a consensus target price of $14.00, suggesting a potential upside of 8.95%. Given SFL's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe SFL is more favorable than Plains GP.

88.3% of Plains GP shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 28.6% of SFL shares are owned by institutional investors. 6.9% of Plains GP shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

SFL has a beta of 0.4, meaning that its share price is 60% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Golar LNG has a beta of 0.05, meaning that its share price is 95% less volatile than the broader market.

SFL pays an annual dividend of $0.88 per share and has a dividend yield of 6.8%. Golar LNG pays an annual dividend of $1.00 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.9%. SFL pays out 183.3% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Golar LNG pays out 62.5% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. SFL has raised its dividend for 1 consecutive years and Golar LNG has raised its dividend for 2 consecutive years.

SFL currently has a consensus price target of $14.00, suggesting a potential upside of 8.95%. Golar LNG has a consensus price target of $63.00, suggesting a potential upside of 20.87%. Given Golar LNG's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Golar LNG is more favorable than SFL.

Golar LNG has lower revenue, but higher earnings than SFL. SFL is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Golar LNG, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Golar LNG has a net margin of 31.27% compared to SFL's net margin of 8.76%. Golar LNG's return on equity of 8.91% beat SFL's return on equity.

In the previous week, Golar LNG had 1 more articles in the media than SFL. MarketBeat recorded 3 mentions for Golar LNG and 2 mentions for SFL. Golar LNG's average media sentiment score of 0.84 beat SFL's score of -0.07 indicating that Golar LNG is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

28.6% of SFL shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 92.2% of Golar LNG shares are held by institutional investors. 0.0% of Golar LNG shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

SFL has a net margin of 8.76% compared to Excelerate Energy's net margin of 3.23%. SFL's return on equity of 3.41% beat Excelerate Energy's return on equity.

In the previous week, SFL had 1 more articles in the media than Excelerate Energy. MarketBeat recorded 2 mentions for SFL and 1 mentions for Excelerate Energy. Excelerate Energy's average media sentiment score of 1.85 beat SFL's score of -0.07 indicating that Excelerate Energy is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

SFL pays an annual dividend of $0.88 per share and has a dividend yield of 6.8%. Excelerate Energy pays an annual dividend of $0.36 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.9%. SFL pays out 183.3% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Excelerate Energy pays out 24.8% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. SFL has raised its dividend for 1 consecutive years and Excelerate Energy has raised its dividend for 2 consecutive years.

Excelerate Energy has higher revenue and earnings than SFL. SFL is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Excelerate Energy, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

SFL currently has a consensus target price of $14.00, suggesting a potential upside of 8.95%. Excelerate Energy has a consensus target price of $40.73, suggesting a potential upside of 1.89%. Given SFL's higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe SFL is more favorable than Excelerate Energy.

SFL has a beta of 0.4, meaning that its share price is 60% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Excelerate Energy has a beta of 1.22, meaning that its share price is 22% more volatile than the broader market.

28.6% of SFL shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 21.8% of Excelerate Energy shares are owned by institutional investors. 2.3% of Excelerate Energy shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.