NYSE:SFL

SFL Competitors

$7.54
-0.35 (-4.44 %)
(As of 04/12/2021 05:12 PM ET)
Add
Compare
Today's Range
$7.46
Now: $7.54
$7.89
50-Day Range
$7.41
MA: $8.01
$8.49
52-Week Range
$5.85
Now: $7.54
$11.56
Volume1.66 million shs
Average Volume1.27 million shs
Market Capitalization$966.06 million
P/E RatioN/A
Dividend Yield7.60%
Beta1.17

Competitors

SFL (NYSE:SFL) Vs. KMI, WMB, TRGP, FRO, GLNG, and STNG

Should you be buying SFL stock or one of its competitors? Companies in the sub-industry of "oil & gas storage & transportation" are considered alternatives and competitors to SFL, including Kinder Morgan (KMI), The Williams Companies (WMB), Targa Resources (TRGP), Frontline (FRO), Golar LNG (GLNG), and Scorpio Tankers (STNG).

SFL (NYSE:SFL) and Kinder Morgan (NYSE:KMI) are both transportation companies, but which is the superior investment? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their institutional ownership, profitability, earnings, risk, valuation, dividends and analyst recommendations.

Profitability

This table compares SFL and Kinder Morgan's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Net MarginsReturn on EquityReturn on Assets
SFL-7.47%11.14%2.91%
Kinder Morgan1.02%6.07%2.74%

Analyst Ratings

This is a breakdown of recent ratings and price targets for SFL and Kinder Morgan, as reported by MarketBeat.com.

Sell RatingsHold RatingsBuy RatingsStrong Buy RatingsRating Score
SFL03002.00
Kinder Morgan113602.25

SFL currently has a consensus target price of $9.1667, indicating a potential upside of 21.57%. Kinder Morgan has a consensus target price of $16.40, indicating a potential downside of 0.61%. Given SFL's higher probable upside, equities research analysts clearly believe SFL is more favorable than Kinder Morgan.

Dividends

SFL pays an annual dividend of $0.60 per share and has a dividend yield of 8.0%. Kinder Morgan pays an annual dividend of $1.05 per share and has a dividend yield of 6.4%. SFL pays out 55.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Kinder Morgan pays out 110.5% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. SFL has raised its dividend for 1 consecutive years and Kinder Morgan has raised its dividend for 3 consecutive years. SFL is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

Insider and Institutional Ownership

29.7% of SFL shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 60.0% of Kinder Morgan shares are owned by institutional investors. 14.2% of Kinder Morgan shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Earnings and Valuation

This table compares SFL and Kinder Morgan's top-line revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

Gross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
SFL$458.85 million2.11$89.18 million$1.096.92
Kinder Morgan$13.21 billion2.83$2.19 billion$0.9517.37

Kinder Morgan has higher revenue and earnings than SFL. SFL is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Kinder Morgan, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Risk & Volatility

SFL has a beta of 1.17, meaning that its share price is 17% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Kinder Morgan has a beta of 0.98, meaning that its share price is 2% less volatile than the S&P 500.

Summary

Kinder Morgan beats SFL on 10 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

The Williams Companies (NYSE:WMB) and SFL (NYSE:SFL) are both oils/energy companies, but which is the better stock? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their earnings, valuation, dividends, risk, profitability, analyst recommendations and institutional ownership.

Profitability

This table compares The Williams Companies and SFL's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Net MarginsReturn on EquityReturn on Assets
The Williams Companies1.86%7.77%2.70%
SFL-7.47%11.14%2.91%

Analyst Recommendations

This is a summary of recent ratings and recommmendations for The Williams Companies and SFL, as reported by MarketBeat.

Sell RatingsHold RatingsBuy RatingsStrong Buy RatingsRating Score
The Williams Companies02912.92
SFL03002.00

The Williams Companies currently has a consensus price target of $25.00, indicating a potential upside of 6.61%. SFL has a consensus price target of $9.1667, indicating a potential upside of 21.57%. Given SFL's higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe SFL is more favorable than The Williams Companies.

Dividends

The Williams Companies pays an annual dividend of $1.64 per share and has a dividend yield of 7.0%. SFL pays an annual dividend of $0.60 per share and has a dividend yield of 8.0%. The Williams Companies pays out 165.7% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. SFL pays out 55.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. The Williams Companies has increased its dividend for 1 consecutive years and SFL has increased its dividend for 1 consecutive years. SFL is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

Insider and Institutional Ownership

83.6% of The Williams Companies shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 29.7% of SFL shares are held by institutional investors. 0.3% of The Williams Companies shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Valuation and Earnings

This table compares The Williams Companies and SFL's gross revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

Gross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
The Williams Companies$8.20 billion3.47$850 million$0.9923.69
SFL$458.85 million2.11$89.18 million$1.096.92

The Williams Companies has higher revenue and earnings than SFL. SFL is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than The Williams Companies, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Volatility and Risk

The Williams Companies has a beta of 1.72, meaning that its stock price is 72% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, SFL has a beta of 1.17, meaning that its stock price is 17% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Summary

The Williams Companies beats SFL on 11 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

Targa Resources (NYSE:TRGP) and SFL (NYSE:SFL) are both oils/energy companies, but which is the better stock? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their earnings, valuation, dividends, risk, profitability, analyst recommendations and institutional ownership.

Insider and Institutional Ownership

84.5% of Targa Resources shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 29.7% of SFL shares are held by institutional investors. 1.5% of Targa Resources shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Profitability

This table compares Targa Resources and SFL's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Net MarginsReturn on EquityReturn on Assets
Targa Resources-20.83%5.97%2.44%
SFL-7.47%11.14%2.91%

Dividends

Targa Resources pays an annual dividend of $0.40 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.3%. SFL pays an annual dividend of $0.60 per share and has a dividend yield of 8.0%. Targa Resources pays out -49.4% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. SFL pays out 55.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Targa Resources has increased its dividend for 1 consecutive years and SFL has increased its dividend for 1 consecutive years.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a summary of recent ratings and recommmendations for Targa Resources and SFL, as reported by MarketBeat.

Sell RatingsHold RatingsBuy RatingsStrong Buy RatingsRating Score
Targa Resources031612.90
SFL03002.00

Targa Resources currently has a consensus price target of $32.50, indicating a potential upside of 3.90%. SFL has a consensus price target of $9.1667, indicating a potential upside of 21.57%. Given SFL's higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe SFL is more favorable than Targa Resources.

Volatility and Risk

Targa Resources has a beta of 2.99, meaning that its stock price is 199% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, SFL has a beta of 1.17, meaning that its stock price is 17% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Valuation and Earnings

This table compares Targa Resources and SFL's gross revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

Gross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Targa Resources$8.67 billion0.82$-209,200,000.00($0.81)-38.62
SFL$458.85 million2.11$89.18 million$1.096.92

SFL has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Targa Resources. Targa Resources is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than SFL, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Summary

Targa Resources beats SFL on 9 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

Frontline (NYSE:FRO) and SFL (NYSE:SFL) are both small-cap transportation companies, but which is the superior stock? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their earnings, risk, profitability, dividends, valuation, analyst recommendations and institutional ownership.

Institutional and Insider Ownership

21.9% of Frontline shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 29.7% of SFL shares are owned by institutional investors. 48.1% of Frontline shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Profitability

This table compares Frontline and SFL's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Net MarginsReturn on EquityReturn on Assets
Frontline38.35%34.28%13.95%
SFL-7.47%11.14%2.91%

Dividends

Frontline pays an annual dividend of $1.20 per share and has a dividend yield of 17.7%. SFL pays an annual dividend of $0.60 per share and has a dividend yield of 8.0%. Frontline pays out 146.3% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. SFL pays out 55.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. SFL has increased its dividend for 1 consecutive years.

Analyst Ratings

This is a summary of recent recommendations for Frontline and SFL, as provided by MarketBeat.com.

Sell RatingsHold RatingsBuy RatingsStrong Buy RatingsRating Score
Frontline26101.89
SFL03002.00

Frontline presently has a consensus price target of $7.8080, suggesting a potential upside of 15.33%. SFL has a consensus price target of $9.1667, suggesting a potential upside of 21.57%. Given SFL's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe SFL is more favorable than Frontline.

Volatility & Risk

Frontline has a beta of 0.47, indicating that its share price is 53% less volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, SFL has a beta of 1.17, indicating that its share price is 17% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Valuation & Earnings

This table compares Frontline and SFL's revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

Gross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Frontline$957.32 million1.40$139.97 million$0.828.26
SFL$458.85 million2.11$89.18 million$1.096.92

Frontline has higher revenue and earnings than SFL. SFL is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Frontline, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Summary

Frontline beats SFL on 9 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

Golar LNG (NASDAQ:GLNG) and SFL (NYSE:SFL) are both small-cap transportation companies, but which is the superior stock? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their earnings, risk, profitability, dividends, valuation, analyst recommendations and institutional ownership.

Valuation and Earnings

This table compares Golar LNG and SFL's gross revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

Gross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Golar LNG$448.75 million2.13$-211,960,000.00N/AN/A
SFL$458.85 million2.11$89.18 million$1.096.92

SFL has higher revenue and earnings than Golar LNG.

Profitability

This table compares Golar LNG and SFL's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Net MarginsReturn on EquityReturn on Assets
Golar LNG-55.97%0.73%0.26%
SFL-7.47%11.14%2.91%

Institutional and Insider Ownership

64.1% of Golar LNG shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 29.7% of SFL shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.0% of Golar LNG shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Volatility and Risk

Golar LNG has a beta of 0.83, meaning that its share price is 17% less volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, SFL has a beta of 1.17, meaning that its share price is 17% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Analyst Ratings

This is a summary of recent recommendations for Golar LNG and SFL, as provided by MarketBeat.com.

Sell RatingsHold RatingsBuy RatingsStrong Buy RatingsRating Score
Golar LNG01502.83
SFL03002.00

Golar LNG presently has a consensus price target of $14.30, suggesting a potential upside of 46.52%. SFL has a consensus price target of $9.1667, suggesting a potential upside of 21.57%. Given Golar LNG's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, equities research analysts clearly believe Golar LNG is more favorable than SFL.

Scorpio Tankers (NYSE:STNG) and SFL (NYSE:SFL) are both small-cap transportation companies, but which is the superior stock? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their earnings, risk, valuation, profitability, dividends, analyst recommendations and institutional ownership.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a breakdown of recent recommendations and price targets for Scorpio Tankers and SFL, as provided by MarketBeat.

Sell RatingsHold RatingsBuy RatingsStrong Buy RatingsRating Score
Scorpio Tankers12602.56
SFL03002.00

Scorpio Tankers presently has a consensus price target of $22.00, suggesting a potential upside of 30.56%. SFL has a consensus price target of $9.1667, suggesting a potential upside of 21.57%. Given Scorpio Tankers' stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, research analysts clearly believe Scorpio Tankers is more favorable than SFL.

Dividends

Scorpio Tankers pays an annual dividend of $0.40 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.4%. SFL pays an annual dividend of $0.60 per share and has a dividend yield of 8.0%. Scorpio Tankers pays out -42.6% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. SFL pays out 55.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Scorpio Tankers has raised its dividend for 1 consecutive years and SFL has raised its dividend for 1 consecutive years.

Institutional and Insider Ownership

38.7% of Scorpio Tankers shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 29.7% of SFL shares are held by institutional investors. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Profitability

This table compares Scorpio Tankers and SFL's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Net MarginsReturn on EquityReturn on Assets
Scorpio Tankers18.26%8.82%3.49%
SFL-7.47%11.14%2.91%

Valuation and Earnings

This table compares Scorpio Tankers and SFL's top-line revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

Gross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Scorpio Tankers$704.33 million1.39$-48,490,000.00($0.94)-17.93
SFL$458.85 million2.11$89.18 million$1.096.92

SFL has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Scorpio Tankers. Scorpio Tankers is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than SFL, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Risk and Volatility

Scorpio Tankers has a beta of 1.18, meaning that its stock price is 18% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, SFL has a beta of 1.17, meaning that its stock price is 17% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Summary

Scorpio Tankers beats SFL on 10 of the 15 factors compared between the two stocks.


SFL Competitors List

Competitor NameCompetitor BTM RankCompetitor PriceCompetitor Price ChangeCompetitor Market CapCompetitor RevenueCompetitor P/E RatioCompetitor Indicator(s)
Kinder Morgan logo
KMI
Kinder Morgan
1.4$16.50-0.2%$37.43 billion$13.21 billion330.00
The Williams Companies logo
WMB
The Williams Companies
2.0$23.45-0.6%$28.46 billion$8.20 billion213.20
Targa Resources logo
TRGP
Targa Resources
1.6$31.28-0.8%$7.10 billion$8.67 billion-3.98
Frontline logo
FRO
Frontline
1.7$6.77-8.9%$1.46 billion$957.32 million2.52Gap Up
Golar LNG logo
GLNG
Golar LNG
1.6$9.76-8.3%$1.03 billion$448.75 million0.00
Scorpio Tankers logo
STNG
Scorpio Tankers
2.5$16.85-4.5%$1.02 billion$704.33 million5.51
Golden Ocean Group logo
GOGL
Golden Ocean Group
0.8$7.01-2.1%$1.00 billion$705.80 million-8.25
GasLog logo
GLOG
GasLog
1.6$5.82-0.3%$552.02 million$668.64 million-3.53
Nordic American Tankers logo
NAT
Nordic American Tankers
1.2$3.13-5.1%$461.17 million$175.45 million5.05
Teekay Tankers logo
TNK
Teekay Tankers
1.4$12.30-10.2%$456.03 million$920.97 million1.87Analyst Downgrade
Teekay logo
TK
Teekay
0.6$3.03-5.6%$323.55 million$1.92 billion-5.83
This page was last updated on 4/12/2021 by MarketBeat.com Staff
MarketBeat - Stock Market News and Research Tools logo

MarketBeat empowers individual investors to make better trading decisions by providing real-time financial data and objective market analysis. Whether you’re looking for analyst ratings, corporate buybacks, dividends, earnings, economic reports, financials, insider trades, IPOs, SEC filings or stock splits, MarketBeat has the objective information you need to analyze any stock. Learn more.

MarketBeat is accredited by the Better Business Bureau

© American Consumer News, LLC dba MarketBeat® 2010-2021. All rights reserved.
326 E 8th St #105, Sioux Falls, SD 57103 | U.S. Based Support Team at [email protected] | (844) 978-6257
MarketBeat does not provide personalized financial advice and does not issue recommendations or offers to buy stock or sell any security. Learn more.

Our Accessibility Statement | Terms of Service | Do Not Sell My Information

© 2021 Market data provided is at least 10-minutes delayed and hosted by Barchart Solutions. Information is provided 'as-is' and solely for informational purposes, not for trading purposes or advice, and is delayed. To see all exchange delays and terms of use please see disclaimer. Fundamental company data provided by Zacks Investment Research. As a bonus to opt-ing into our email newsletters, you will also get a free subscription to the Liberty Through Wealth e-newsletter. You can opt out at any time.