SFL (SFL) Competitors

International Seaways has higher revenue and earnings than SFL. International Seaways is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than SFL, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

International Seaways presently has a consensus target price of $109.80, indicating a potential downside of 3.18%. SFL has a consensus target price of $14.00, indicating a potential upside of 11.41%. Given SFL's higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe SFL is more favorable than International Seaways.

International Seaways has a net margin of 61.98% compared to SFL's net margin of 8.76%. International Seaways' return on equity of 31.75% beat SFL's return on equity.

International Seaways has a beta of -0.14, indicating that its share price is 114% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, SFL has a beta of 0.43, indicating that its share price is 57% less volatile than the broader market.

67.3% of International Seaways shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 28.6% of SFL shares are held by institutional investors. 1.7% of International Seaways shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

International Seaways pays an annual dividend of $20.20 per share and has a dividend yield of 17.8%. SFL pays an annual dividend of $0.88 per share and has a dividend yield of 7.0%. International Seaways pays out 129.2% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. SFL pays out 183.3% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. SFL has increased its dividend for 1 consecutive years. International Seaways is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

In the previous week, International Seaways had 2 more articles in the media than SFL. MarketBeat recorded 7 mentions for International Seaways and 5 mentions for SFL. International Seaways' average media sentiment score of 0.75 beat SFL's score of 0.31 indicating that International Seaways is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Navigator has higher earnings, but lower revenue than SFL. Navigator is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than SFL, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Navigator has a net margin of 22.80% compared to SFL's net margin of 8.76%. Navigator's return on equity of 10.45% beat SFL's return on equity.

Navigator currently has a consensus price target of $23.00, indicating a potential upside of 5.00%. SFL has a consensus price target of $14.00, indicating a potential upside of 11.41%. Given SFL's higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe SFL is more favorable than Navigator.

19.0% of Navigator shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 28.6% of SFL shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.4% of Navigator shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Navigator pays an annual dividend of $0.28 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.3%. SFL pays an annual dividend of $0.88 per share and has a dividend yield of 7.0%. Navigator pays out 12.9% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. SFL pays out 183.3% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Navigator has raised its dividend for 1 consecutive years and SFL has raised its dividend for 1 consecutive years.

Navigator has a beta of 0.48, indicating that its stock price is 52% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, SFL has a beta of 0.43, indicating that its stock price is 57% less volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, SFL had 3 more articles in the media than Navigator. MarketBeat recorded 5 mentions for SFL and 2 mentions for Navigator. Navigator's average media sentiment score of 0.55 beat SFL's score of 0.31 indicating that Navigator is being referred to more favorably in the media.

SFL has a beta of 0.43, suggesting that its share price is 57% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, South Bow has a beta of 0.22, suggesting that its share price is 78% less volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, South Bow had 2 more articles in the media than SFL. MarketBeat recorded 7 mentions for South Bow and 5 mentions for SFL. South Bow's average media sentiment score of 0.56 beat SFL's score of 0.31 indicating that South Bow is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

South Bow has a net margin of 22.99% compared to SFL's net margin of 8.76%. South Bow's return on equity of 15.84% beat SFL's return on equity.

28.6% of SFL shares are held by institutional investors. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

South Bow has higher revenue and earnings than SFL. South Bow is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than SFL, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

SFL pays an annual dividend of $0.88 per share and has a dividend yield of 7.0%. South Bow pays an annual dividend of $2.00 per share and has a dividend yield of 5.9%. SFL pays out 183.3% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. South Bow pays out 90.5% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. SFL has raised its dividend for 1 consecutive years. SFL is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

SFL presently has a consensus price target of $14.00, suggesting a potential upside of 11.41%. South Bow has a consensus price target of $32.67, suggesting a potential downside of 3.21%. Given SFL's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, equities research analysts clearly believe SFL is more favorable than South Bow.

Hafnia has a net margin of 56.72% compared to SFL's net margin of 8.76%. Hafnia's return on equity of 26.74% beat SFL's return on equity.

Hafnia presently has a consensus target price of $12.00, indicating a potential upside of 18.51%. SFL has a consensus target price of $14.00, indicating a potential upside of 11.41%. Given Hafnia's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, equities research analysts plainly believe Hafnia is more favorable than SFL.

In the previous week, Hafnia had 7 more articles in the media than SFL. MarketBeat recorded 12 mentions for Hafnia and 5 mentions for SFL. Hafnia's average media sentiment score of 0.39 beat SFL's score of 0.31 indicating that Hafnia is being referred to more favorably in the media.

28.6% of SFL shares are owned by institutional investors. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Hafnia has a beta of 0.52, indicating that its stock price is 48% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, SFL has a beta of 0.43, indicating that its stock price is 57% less volatile than the broader market.

Hafnia pays an annual dividend of $2.00 per share and has a dividend yield of 19.8%. SFL pays an annual dividend of $0.88 per share and has a dividend yield of 7.0%. Hafnia pays out 151.5% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. SFL pays out 183.3% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. SFL has increased its dividend for 1 consecutive years. Hafnia is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

Hafnia has higher revenue and earnings than SFL. Hafnia is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than SFL, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.