Golden Ocean Group Competitors

Golden Ocean Group (NASDAQ:GOGL) and Kinder Morgan (NYSE:KMI) are both transportation companies, but which is the better stock? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their dividends, earnings, valuation, institutional ownership, risk, analyst recommendations and profitability.

Profitability

This table compares Golden Ocean Group and Kinder Morgan's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Analyst Ratings

This is a breakdown of recent ratings for Golden Ocean Group and Kinder Morgan, as provided by MarketBeat.

Golden Ocean Group presently has a consensus price target of $7.00, suggesting a potential downside of 0.14%. Kinder Morgan has a consensus price target of $16.40, suggesting a potential downside of 0.61%. Given Golden Ocean Group's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, equities analysts clearly believe Golden Ocean Group is more favorable than Kinder Morgan.

Volatility and Risk

Golden Ocean Group has a beta of 1.83, meaning that its stock price is 83% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Kinder Morgan has a beta of 0.98, meaning that its stock price is 2% less volatile than the S&P 500.

Valuation & Earnings

This table compares Golden Ocean Group and Kinder Morgan's revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

Kinder Morgan has higher revenue and earnings than Golden Ocean Group.

Institutional & Insider Ownership

12.4% of Golden Ocean Group shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 60.0% of Kinder Morgan shares are owned by institutional investors. 14.2% of Kinder Morgan shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Summary

Kinder Morgan beats Golden Ocean Group on 10 of the 13 factors compared between the two stocks.

Golden Ocean Group (NASDAQ:GOGL) and The Williams Companies (NYSE:WMB) are both transportation companies, but which is the better stock? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their dividends, earnings, valuation, institutional ownership, risk, analyst recommendations and profitability.

Profitability

This table compares Golden Ocean Group and The Williams Companies' net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Analyst Ratings

This is a breakdown of recent ratings for Golden Ocean Group and The Williams Companies, as provided by MarketBeat.

Golden Ocean Group presently has a consensus price target of $7.00, suggesting a potential downside of 0.14%. The Williams Companies has a consensus price target of $25.00, suggesting a potential upside of 6.61%. Given The Williams Companies' stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe The Williams Companies is more favorable than Golden Ocean Group.

Volatility and Risk

Golden Ocean Group has a beta of 1.83, meaning that its stock price is 83% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, The Williams Companies has a beta of 1.72, meaning that its stock price is 72% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Valuation & Earnings

This table compares Golden Ocean Group and The Williams Companies' revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

The Williams Companies has higher revenue and earnings than Golden Ocean Group.

Institutional & Insider Ownership

12.4% of Golden Ocean Group shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 83.6% of The Williams Companies shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.3% of The Williams Companies shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Summary

The Williams Companies beats Golden Ocean Group on 13 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

Golden Ocean Group (NASDAQ:GOGL) and Targa Resources (NYSE:TRGP) are both transportation companies, but which is the better stock? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their dividends, earnings, valuation, institutional ownership, risk, analyst recommendations and profitability.

Institutional & Insider Ownership

12.4% of Golden Ocean Group shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 84.5% of Targa Resources shares are owned by institutional investors. 1.5% of Targa Resources shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Valuation & Earnings

This table compares Golden Ocean Group and Targa Resources' revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

Golden Ocean Group has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Targa Resources.

Analyst Ratings

This is a breakdown of recent ratings for Golden Ocean Group and Targa Resources, as provided by MarketBeat.

Golden Ocean Group presently has a consensus price target of $7.00, suggesting a potential downside of 0.14%. Targa Resources has a consensus price target of $32.50, suggesting a potential upside of 3.90%. Given Targa Resources' stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Targa Resources is more favorable than Golden Ocean Group.

Profitability

This table compares Golden Ocean Group and Targa Resources' net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Volatility and Risk

Golden Ocean Group has a beta of 1.83, meaning that its stock price is 83% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Targa Resources has a beta of 2.99, meaning that its stock price is 199% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Summary

Targa Resources beats Golden Ocean Group on 11 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

Frontline (NYSE:FRO) and Golden Ocean Group (NASDAQ:GOGL) are both small-cap transportation companies, but which is the better business? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their earnings, dividends, valuation, institutional ownership, profitability, risk and analyst recommendations.

Insider and Institutional Ownership

21.9% of Frontline shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 12.4% of Golden Ocean Group shares are owned by institutional investors. 48.1% of Frontline shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Valuation and Earnings

This table compares Frontline and Golden Ocean Group's top-line revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

Frontline has higher revenue and earnings than Golden Ocean Group.

Analyst Ratings

This is a summary of recent recommendations and price targets for Frontline and Golden Ocean Group, as reported by MarketBeat.com.

Frontline presently has a consensus target price of $7.8080, suggesting a potential upside of 15.33%. Golden Ocean Group has a consensus target price of $7.00, suggesting a potential downside of 0.14%. Given Frontline's higher probable upside, research analysts plainly believe Frontline is more favorable than Golden Ocean Group.

Profitability

This table compares Frontline and Golden Ocean Group's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Risk and Volatility

Frontline has a beta of 0.47, suggesting that its share price is 53% less volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Golden Ocean Group has a beta of 1.83, suggesting that its share price is 83% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Summary

Frontline beats Golden Ocean Group on 9 of the 13 factors compared between the two stocks.

Golar LNG (NASDAQ:GLNG) and Golden Ocean Group (NASDAQ:GOGL) are both small-cap transportation companies, but which is the better business? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their earnings, dividends, valuation, institutional ownership, profitability, risk and analyst recommendations.

Insider and Institutional Ownership

64.1% of Golar LNG shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 12.4% of Golden Ocean Group shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.0% of Golar LNG shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Valuation and Earnings

This table compares Golar LNG and Golden Ocean Group's top-line revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

Golden Ocean Group has higher revenue and earnings than Golar LNG.

Analyst Ratings

This is a summary of recent recommendations and price targets for Golar LNG and Golden Ocean Group, as reported by MarketBeat.com.

Golar LNG presently has a consensus target price of $14.30, suggesting a potential upside of 46.52%. Golden Ocean Group has a consensus target price of $7.00, suggesting a potential downside of 0.14%. Given Golar LNG's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, research analysts plainly believe Golar LNG is more favorable than Golden Ocean Group.

Profitability

This table compares Golar LNG and Golden Ocean Group's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Risk and Volatility

Golar LNG has a beta of 0.83, suggesting that its share price is 17% less volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Golden Ocean Group has a beta of 1.83, suggesting that its share price is 83% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Summary

Golar LNG beats Golden Ocean Group on 8 of the 12 factors compared between the two stocks.

Scorpio Tankers (NYSE:STNG) and Golden Ocean Group (NASDAQ:GOGL) are both small-cap transportation companies, but which is the better business? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their earnings, dividends, valuation, institutional ownership, profitability, risk and analyst recommendations.

Insider and Institutional Ownership

38.7% of Scorpio Tankers shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 12.4% of Golden Ocean Group shares are owned by institutional investors. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Valuation and Earnings

This table compares Scorpio Tankers and Golden Ocean Group's top-line revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

Golden Ocean Group has higher revenue and earnings than Scorpio Tankers.

Analyst Ratings

This is a summary of recent recommendations and price targets for Scorpio Tankers and Golden Ocean Group, as reported by MarketBeat.com.

Scorpio Tankers presently has a consensus target price of $22.00, suggesting a potential upside of 30.56%. Golden Ocean Group has a consensus target price of $7.00, suggesting a potential downside of 0.14%. Given Scorpio Tankers' higher probable upside, research analysts plainly believe Scorpio Tankers is more favorable than Golden Ocean Group.

Profitability

This table compares Scorpio Tankers and Golden Ocean Group's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Risk and Volatility

Scorpio Tankers has a beta of 1.18, suggesting that its share price is 18% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Golden Ocean Group has a beta of 1.83, suggesting that its share price is 83% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Summary

Scorpio Tankers beats Golden Ocean Group on 7 of the 12 factors compared between the two stocks.