Diana Shipping (DSX) Competitors

21.7% of Safe Bulkers shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 48.7% of Diana Shipping shares are owned by institutional investors. 40.3% of Safe Bulkers shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Safe Bulkers has a beta of 0.97, meaning that its share price is 3% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Diana Shipping has a beta of 0.59, meaning that its share price is 41% less volatile than the broader market.

Safe Bulkers has higher revenue and earnings than Diana Shipping. Diana Shipping is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Safe Bulkers, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Safe Bulkers pays an annual dividend of $0.30 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.4%. Diana Shipping pays an annual dividend of $0.04 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.4%. Safe Bulkers pays out 38.5% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Diana Shipping pays out 8.3% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years.

Safe Bulkers presently has a consensus target price of $6.00, indicating a potential downside of 31.93%. Given Safe Bulkers' stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, equities research analysts plainly believe Safe Bulkers is more favorable than Diana Shipping.

Safe Bulkers has a net margin of 28.29% compared to Diana Shipping's net margin of 27.88%. Safe Bulkers' return on equity of 9.63% beat Diana Shipping's return on equity.

In the previous week, Safe Bulkers had 6 more articles in the media than Diana Shipping. MarketBeat recorded 7 mentions for Safe Bulkers and 1 mentions for Diana Shipping. Safe Bulkers' average media sentiment score of 1.28 beat Diana Shipping's score of 0.67 indicating that Safe Bulkers is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Tsakos Energy Navigation pays an annual dividend of $2.00 per share and has a dividend yield of 4.0%. Diana Shipping pays an annual dividend of $0.04 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.4%. Tsakos Energy Navigation pays out 20.3% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Diana Shipping pays out 8.3% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years.

Tsakos Energy Navigation currently has a consensus target price of $29.50, suggesting a potential downside of 40.96%. Given Tsakos Energy Navigation's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Tsakos Energy Navigation is more favorable than Diana Shipping.

19.2% of Tsakos Energy Navigation shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 48.7% of Diana Shipping shares are owned by institutional investors. 1.4% of Tsakos Energy Navigation shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Tsakos Energy Navigation has a net margin of 33.81% compared to Diana Shipping's net margin of 27.88%. Tsakos Energy Navigation's return on equity of 29.44% beat Diana Shipping's return on equity.

Tsakos Energy Navigation has a beta of -0.1, meaning that its share price is 110% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Diana Shipping has a beta of 0.59, meaning that its share price is 41% less volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, Tsakos Energy Navigation had 5 more articles in the media than Diana Shipping. MarketBeat recorded 6 mentions for Tsakos Energy Navigation and 1 mentions for Diana Shipping. Diana Shipping's average media sentiment score of 0.67 beat Tsakos Energy Navigation's score of 0.65 indicating that Diana Shipping is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Tsakos Energy Navigation has higher revenue and earnings than Diana Shipping. Tsakos Energy Navigation is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Diana Shipping, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

22.3% of Himalaya Shipping shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 48.7% of Diana Shipping shares are owned by institutional investors. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Diana Shipping has higher revenue and earnings than Himalaya Shipping. Diana Shipping is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Himalaya Shipping, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Himalaya Shipping has a beta of 1.36, meaning that its share price is 36% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Diana Shipping has a beta of 0.59, meaning that its share price is 41% less volatile than the broader market.

Himalaya Shipping has a net margin of 31.44% compared to Diana Shipping's net margin of 27.88%. Himalaya Shipping's return on equity of 32.83% beat Diana Shipping's return on equity.

In the previous week, Diana Shipping had 1 more articles in the media than Himalaya Shipping. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for Diana Shipping and 0 mentions for Himalaya Shipping. Diana Shipping's average media sentiment score of 0.67 beat Himalaya Shipping's score of 0.00 indicating that Diana Shipping is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Diana Shipping has a beta of 0.59, indicating that its stock price is 41% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Pangaea Logistics Solutions has a beta of 0.82, indicating that its stock price is 18% less volatile than the broader market.

48.7% of Diana Shipping shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 60.2% of Pangaea Logistics Solutions shares are held by institutional investors. 16.7% of Pangaea Logistics Solutions shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Pangaea Logistics Solutions has higher revenue and earnings than Diana Shipping. Diana Shipping is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Pangaea Logistics Solutions, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

In the previous week, Diana Shipping had 1 more articles in the media than Pangaea Logistics Solutions. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for Diana Shipping and 0 mentions for Pangaea Logistics Solutions. Pangaea Logistics Solutions' average media sentiment score of 1.82 beat Diana Shipping's score of 0.67 indicating that Pangaea Logistics Solutions is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Diana Shipping pays an annual dividend of $0.04 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.4%. Pangaea Logistics Solutions pays an annual dividend of $0.40 per share and has a dividend yield of 4.7%. Diana Shipping pays out 8.3% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Pangaea Logistics Solutions pays out 53.3% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years.

Diana Shipping has a net margin of 27.88% compared to Pangaea Logistics Solutions' net margin of 6.70%. Pangaea Logistics Solutions' return on equity of 9.42% beat Diana Shipping's return on equity.