Diana Shipping (DSX) Competitors

In the previous week, Safe Bulkers had 5 more articles in the media than Diana Shipping. MarketBeat recorded 6 mentions for Safe Bulkers and 1 mentions for Diana Shipping. Safe Bulkers' average media sentiment score of 0.94 beat Diana Shipping's score of 0.04 indicating that Safe Bulkers is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Safe Bulkers has higher revenue and earnings than Diana Shipping. Diana Shipping is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Safe Bulkers, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Diana Shipping pays an annual dividend of $0.04 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.3%. Safe Bulkers pays an annual dividend of $0.30 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.5%. Diana Shipping pays out 8.3% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Safe Bulkers pays out 38.5% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years.

Safe Bulkers has a consensus target price of $6.00, suggesting a potential downside of 29.36%. Given Safe Bulkers' stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Safe Bulkers is more favorable than Diana Shipping.

48.7% of Diana Shipping shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 21.7% of Safe Bulkers shares are owned by institutional investors. 40.3% of Safe Bulkers shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Diana Shipping has a beta of 0.51, indicating that its stock price is 49% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Safe Bulkers has a beta of 0.82, indicating that its stock price is 18% less volatile than the broader market.

Safe Bulkers has a net margin of 28.29% compared to Diana Shipping's net margin of 27.88%. Safe Bulkers' return on equity of 9.63% beat Diana Shipping's return on equity.

Tsakos Energy Navigation has a net margin of 33.81% compared to Diana Shipping's net margin of 27.88%. Tsakos Energy Navigation's return on equity of 46.44% beat Diana Shipping's return on equity.

19.2% of Tsakos Energy Navigation shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 48.7% of Diana Shipping shares are owned by institutional investors. 1.4% of Tsakos Energy Navigation shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Tsakos Energy Navigation pays an annual dividend of $2.00 per share and has a dividend yield of 4.2%. Diana Shipping pays an annual dividend of $0.04 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.3%. Tsakos Energy Navigation pays out 20.3% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Diana Shipping pays out 8.3% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years.

Tsakos Energy Navigation has a beta of -0.26, suggesting that its stock price is 126% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Diana Shipping has a beta of 0.51, suggesting that its stock price is 49% less volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, Tsakos Energy Navigation had 17 more articles in the media than Diana Shipping. MarketBeat recorded 18 mentions for Tsakos Energy Navigation and 1 mentions for Diana Shipping. Tsakos Energy Navigation's average media sentiment score of 0.96 beat Diana Shipping's score of 0.04 indicating that Tsakos Energy Navigation is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Tsakos Energy Navigation has higher revenue and earnings than Diana Shipping. Tsakos Energy Navigation is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Diana Shipping, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Tsakos Energy Navigation currently has a consensus price target of $29.50, indicating a potential downside of 38.33%. Given Tsakos Energy Navigation's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, research analysts plainly believe Tsakos Energy Navigation is more favorable than Diana Shipping.

Himalaya Shipping has a beta of 1.37, indicating that its share price is 37% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Diana Shipping has a beta of 0.51, indicating that its share price is 49% less volatile than the broader market.

Diana Shipping has higher revenue and earnings than Himalaya Shipping. Diana Shipping is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Himalaya Shipping, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Himalaya Shipping has a net margin of 31.44% compared to Diana Shipping's net margin of 27.88%. Himalaya Shipping's return on equity of 32.83% beat Diana Shipping's return on equity.

22.3% of Himalaya Shipping shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 48.7% of Diana Shipping shares are held by institutional investors. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

In the previous week, Himalaya Shipping had 4 more articles in the media than Diana Shipping. MarketBeat recorded 5 mentions for Himalaya Shipping and 1 mentions for Diana Shipping. Himalaya Shipping's average media sentiment score of 0.92 beat Diana Shipping's score of 0.04 indicating that Himalaya Shipping is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Diana Shipping has a beta of 0.51, meaning that its share price is 49% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Pangaea Logistics Solutions has a beta of 0.79, meaning that its share price is 21% less volatile than the broader market.

Diana Shipping pays an annual dividend of $0.04 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.3%. Pangaea Logistics Solutions pays an annual dividend of $0.40 per share and has a dividend yield of 4.8%. Diana Shipping pays out 8.3% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Pangaea Logistics Solutions pays out 53.3% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years.

Pangaea Logistics Solutions has higher revenue and earnings than Diana Shipping. Diana Shipping is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Pangaea Logistics Solutions, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

48.7% of Diana Shipping shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 60.2% of Pangaea Logistics Solutions shares are held by institutional investors. 16.7% of Pangaea Logistics Solutions shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Diana Shipping has a net margin of 27.88% compared to Pangaea Logistics Solutions' net margin of 6.70%. Pangaea Logistics Solutions' return on equity of 9.42% beat Diana Shipping's return on equity.

In the previous week, Diana Shipping and Diana Shipping both had 1 articles in the media. Pangaea Logistics Solutions' average media sentiment score of 1.90 beat Diana Shipping's score of 0.04 indicating that Pangaea Logistics Solutions is being referred to more favorably in the news media.