Go Pro

Universal Logistics (ULH) Competitors

Universal Logistics logo
$15.78 -0.72 (-4.36%)
Closing price 07/24/2026 04:00 PM Eastern
Extended Trading
$15.60 -0.17 (-1.11%)
As of 07/24/2026 07:34 PM Eastern
Extended trading is trading that happens on electronic markets outside of regular trading hours. This is a fair market value extended hours price provided by Massive. Learn more.

ULH vs. GSL, ULCC, VTOL, NVGS, and CCEC

Should you buy Universal Logistics stock or one of its competitors? MarketBeat compares Universal Logistics with other companies and stocks that may be similar based on industry, sector, market capitalization, business model, investor interest, or shared news coverage. Companies and stocks commonly compared with Universal Logistics include Global Ship Lease (GSL), Frontier Group (ULCC), Bristow Group (VTOL), Navigator (NVGS), and Capital Clean Energy Carriers (CCEC). These companies are all part of the "transportation" industry.

How does Universal Logistics compare to Global Ship Lease?

Global Ship Lease (NYSE:GSL) and Universal Logistics (NASDAQ:ULH) are both small-cap transportation companies, but which is the better investment? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their valuation, earnings, dividends, media sentiment, profitability, risk, institutional ownership and analyst recommendations.

Global Ship Lease has a net margin of 50.01% compared to Universal Logistics' net margin of -4.29%. Global Ship Lease's return on equity of 21.11% beat Universal Logistics' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Global Ship Lease50.01% 21.11% 13.42%
Universal Logistics -4.29%2.65%0.84%

Global Ship Lease has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Universal Logistics. Universal Logistics is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Global Ship Lease, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Global Ship Lease$766.45M2.05$416.45M$10.534.15
Universal Logistics$1.56B0.27-$99.87M-$2.51N/A

Global Ship Lease pays an annual dividend of $2.50 per share and has a dividend yield of 5.7%. Universal Logistics pays an annual dividend of $0.42 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.7%. Global Ship Lease pays out 23.7% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Universal Logistics pays out -16.7% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Global Ship Lease has increased its dividend for 2 consecutive years. Global Ship Lease is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

In the previous week, Global Ship Lease had 3 more articles in the media than Universal Logistics. MarketBeat recorded 4 mentions for Global Ship Lease and 1 mentions for Universal Logistics. Universal Logistics' average media sentiment score of 1.89 beat Global Ship Lease's score of 0.68 indicating that Universal Logistics is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Global Ship Lease Positive
Universal Logistics Very Positive

Global Ship Lease presently has a consensus price target of $46.50, suggesting a potential upside of 6.51%. Universal Logistics has a consensus price target of $15.00, suggesting a potential downside of 4.94%. Given Global Ship Lease's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, equities research analysts plainly believe Global Ship Lease is more favorable than Universal Logistics.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Global Ship Lease
1 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
3 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.80
Universal Logistics
2 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
1.33

50.1% of Global Ship Lease shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 25.5% of Universal Logistics shares are held by institutional investors. 7.4% of Global Ship Lease shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 73.5% of Universal Logistics shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Global Ship Lease has a beta of 0.9, indicating that its stock price is 10% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Universal Logistics has a beta of 0.68, indicating that its stock price is 32% less volatile than the broader market.

Summary

Global Ship Lease beats Universal Logistics on 16 of the 20 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Universal Logistics compare to Frontier Group?

Frontier Group (NASDAQ:ULCC) and Universal Logistics (NASDAQ:ULH) are both small-cap transportation companies, but which is the better business? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their risk, valuation, analyst recommendations, dividends, institutional ownership, profitability, media sentiment and earnings.

In the previous week, Frontier Group had 7 more articles in the media than Universal Logistics. MarketBeat recorded 8 mentions for Frontier Group and 1 mentions for Universal Logistics. Universal Logistics' average media sentiment score of 1.89 beat Frontier Group's score of 0.44 indicating that Universal Logistics is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Frontier Group Neutral
Universal Logistics Very Positive

Frontier Group presently has a consensus target price of $6.86, indicating a potential upside of 18.02%. Universal Logistics has a consensus target price of $15.00, indicating a potential downside of 4.94%. Given Frontier Group's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, equities research analysts plainly believe Frontier Group is more favorable than Universal Logistics.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Frontier Group
3 Sell rating(s)
5 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
1.63
Universal Logistics
2 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
1.33

Universal Logistics has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Frontier Group. Universal Logistics is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Frontier Group, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Frontier Group$3.72B0.36-$137M-$1.60N/A
Universal Logistics$1.56B0.27-$99.87M-$2.51N/A

25.5% of Universal Logistics shares are owned by institutional investors. 48.0% of Frontier Group shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 73.5% of Universal Logistics shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Universal Logistics has a net margin of -4.29% compared to Frontier Group's net margin of -9.62%. Universal Logistics' return on equity of 2.65% beat Frontier Group's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Frontier Group-9.62% -39.20% -2.36%
Universal Logistics -4.29%2.65%0.84%

Frontier Group has a beta of 2.56, suggesting that its share price is 156% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Universal Logistics has a beta of 0.68, suggesting that its share price is 32% less volatile than the broader market.

Summary

Frontier Group beats Universal Logistics on 8 of the 15 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Universal Logistics compare to Bristow Group?

Universal Logistics (NASDAQ:ULH) and Bristow Group (NYSE:VTOL) are both small-cap transportation companies, but which is the better business? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their earnings, institutional ownership, media sentiment, risk, analyst recommendations, dividends, valuation and profitability.

Universal Logistics pays an annual dividend of $0.42 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.7%. Bristow Group pays an annual dividend of $0.50 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.1%. Universal Logistics pays out -16.7% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Bristow Group pays out 13.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Universal Logistics is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

Bristow Group has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Universal Logistics. Universal Logistics is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Bristow Group, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Universal Logistics$1.56B0.27-$99.87M-$2.51N/A
Bristow Group$1.49B0.91$129.07M$3.8411.91

Bristow Group has a net margin of 7.51% compared to Universal Logistics' net margin of -4.29%. Bristow Group's return on equity of 11.10% beat Universal Logistics' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Universal Logistics-4.29% 2.65% 0.84%
Bristow Group 7.51%11.10%4.95%

25.5% of Universal Logistics shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 93.3% of Bristow Group shares are held by institutional investors. 73.5% of Universal Logistics shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 13.4% of Bristow Group shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Universal Logistics presently has a consensus price target of $15.00, indicating a potential downside of 4.94%. Bristow Group has a consensus price target of $60.00, indicating a potential upside of 31.23%. Given Bristow Group's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Bristow Group is more favorable than Universal Logistics.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Universal Logistics
2 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
1.33
Bristow Group
0 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
3 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.75

In the previous week, Bristow Group had 2 more articles in the media than Universal Logistics. MarketBeat recorded 3 mentions for Bristow Group and 1 mentions for Universal Logistics. Universal Logistics' average media sentiment score of 1.89 beat Bristow Group's score of 0.51 indicating that Universal Logistics is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Universal Logistics Very Positive
Bristow Group Positive

Universal Logistics has a beta of 0.68, indicating that its stock price is 32% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Bristow Group has a beta of 1.23, indicating that its stock price is 23% more volatile than the broader market.

Summary

Bristow Group beats Universal Logistics on 13 of the 18 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Universal Logistics compare to Navigator?

Navigator (NYSE:NVGS) and Universal Logistics (NASDAQ:ULH) are both small-cap transportation companies, but which is the better stock? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their dividends, profitability, earnings, media sentiment, valuation, analyst recommendations, risk and institutional ownership.

Navigator has a net margin of 18.84% compared to Universal Logistics' net margin of -4.29%. Navigator's return on equity of 7.01% beat Universal Logistics' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Navigator18.84% 7.01% 3.80%
Universal Logistics -4.29%2.65%0.84%

19.0% of Navigator shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 25.5% of Universal Logistics shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.4% of Navigator shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 73.5% of Universal Logistics shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

In the previous week, Navigator had 3 more articles in the media than Universal Logistics. MarketBeat recorded 4 mentions for Navigator and 1 mentions for Universal Logistics. Universal Logistics' average media sentiment score of 1.89 beat Navigator's score of 0.94 indicating that Universal Logistics is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Navigator Positive
Universal Logistics Very Positive

Navigator pays an annual dividend of $0.28 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.3%. Universal Logistics pays an annual dividend of $0.42 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.7%. Navigator pays out 17.2% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Universal Logistics pays out -16.7% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Navigator has raised its dividend for 1 consecutive years. Universal Logistics is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

Navigator presently has a consensus target price of $23.33, suggesting a potential upside of 7.82%. Universal Logistics has a consensus target price of $15.00, suggesting a potential downside of 4.94%. Given Navigator's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, equities research analysts clearly believe Navigator is more favorable than Universal Logistics.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Navigator
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
5 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.17
Universal Logistics
2 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
1.33

Navigator has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Universal Logistics. Universal Logistics is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Navigator, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Navigator$586.96M2.28$100.12M$1.6313.28
Universal Logistics$1.56B0.27-$99.87M-$2.51N/A

Navigator has a beta of 0.46, meaning that its stock price is 54% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Universal Logistics has a beta of 0.68, meaning that its stock price is 32% less volatile than the broader market.

Summary

Navigator beats Universal Logistics on 13 of the 20 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Universal Logistics compare to Capital Clean Energy Carriers?

Universal Logistics (NASDAQ:ULH) and Capital Clean Energy Carriers (NASDAQ:CCEC) are both small-cap transportation companies, but which is the superior investment? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their institutional ownership, dividends, risk, valuation, analyst recommendations, profitability, media sentiment and earnings.

Capital Clean Energy Carriers has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Universal Logistics. Universal Logistics is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Capital Clean Energy Carriers, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Universal Logistics$1.56B0.27-$99.87M-$2.51N/A
Capital Clean Energy Carriers$392.71M3.47$170.76M$1.8912.35

Capital Clean Energy Carriers has a net margin of 28.02% compared to Universal Logistics' net margin of -4.29%. Capital Clean Energy Carriers' return on equity of 6.73% beat Universal Logistics' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Universal Logistics-4.29% 2.65% 0.84%
Capital Clean Energy Carriers 28.02%6.73%2.39%

Universal Logistics pays an annual dividend of $0.42 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.7%. Capital Clean Energy Carriers pays an annual dividend of $0.60 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.6%. Universal Logistics pays out -16.7% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Capital Clean Energy Carriers pays out 31.7% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Universal Logistics is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

25.5% of Universal Logistics shares are held by institutional investors. 73.5% of Universal Logistics shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

In the previous week, Capital Clean Energy Carriers had 6 more articles in the media than Universal Logistics. MarketBeat recorded 7 mentions for Capital Clean Energy Carriers and 1 mentions for Universal Logistics. Universal Logistics' average media sentiment score of 1.89 beat Capital Clean Energy Carriers' score of 1.08 indicating that Universal Logistics is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Universal Logistics Very Positive
Capital Clean Energy Carriers Positive

Universal Logistics currently has a consensus price target of $15.00, indicating a potential downside of 4.94%. Capital Clean Energy Carriers has a consensus price target of $24.75, indicating a potential upside of 6.00%. Given Capital Clean Energy Carriers' stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Capital Clean Energy Carriers is more favorable than Universal Logistics.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Universal Logistics
2 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
1.33
Capital Clean Energy Carriers
0 Sell rating(s)
3 Hold rating(s)
2 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.40

Universal Logistics has a beta of 0.68, suggesting that its stock price is 32% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Capital Clean Energy Carriers has a beta of 0.63, suggesting that its stock price is 37% less volatile than the broader market.

Summary

Capital Clean Energy Carriers beats Universal Logistics on 11 of the 18 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Universal Logistics News Delivered to You Automatically

Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for ULH and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.

Subscribe Now
SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding ULH and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.
Skip Chart

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of NASDAQ and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Skip Chart

ULH vs. The Competition

MetricUniversal LogisticsTRANS IndustryTransportation SectorNASDAQ Exchange
Market Cap$416.12M$7.29B$8.91B$12.20B
Dividend Yield2.66%2.53%973.93%9.41%
P/E Ratio-6.2931.2424.1923.63
Price / Sales0.272.925.47111.98
Price / Cash2.859.648.4958.78
Price / Book0.772.452.306.01
Net Income-$99.87M$243.42M$532.19M$331.99M
7 Day Performance10.43%0.55%2.31%-0.63%
1 Month Performance3.14%3.80%1.22%-3.04%
1 Year Performance-47.59%-8.22%26.31%13.30%

Universal Logistics Competitors List

CompanyMarketRankShare PriceAnalysts' Price Target1Y Price PerformanceMarket CapRevenueP/E RatioEmployee CountIndicator(s)
ULH
Universal Logistics
1.7848 of 5 stars
$15.78
-4.4%
$15.00
-4.9%
-47.6%$416.12M$1.56BN/A10,525
GSL
Global Ship Lease
3.9725 of 5 stars
$42.04
+2.3%
$46.50
+10.6%
+50.5%$1.51B$766.45M3.997
ULCC
Frontier Group
2.0233 of 5 stars
$6.16
-0.8%
$6.86
+11.3%
+31.4%$1.42B$3.72BN/A7,750
VTOL
Bristow Group
4.5181 of 5 stars
$45.20
+2.4%
$60.00
+32.7%
+27.2%$1.34B$1.49B11.773,660
NVGS
Navigator
4.6791 of 5 stars
$21.39
+1.9%
$23.33
+9.1%
+34.8%$1.32B$576.17M13.13120

Related Companies and Tools


This page (NASDAQ:ULH) was last updated on 7/26/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.
From Our Partners