Go Pro

Universal Logistics (ULH) Competitors

Universal Logistics logo
$14.71 0.00 (0.00%)
Closing price 07/2/2026 04:00 PM Eastern
Extended Trading
$14.82 +0.11 (+0.75%)
As of 04:17 AM Eastern
Extended trading is trading that happens on electronic markets outside of regular trading hours. This is a fair market value extended hours price provided by Massive. Learn more.

ULH vs. FLNG, LPG, GSL, CCEC, and VTOL

Should you buy Universal Logistics stock or one of its competitors? MarketBeat compares Universal Logistics with other companies and stocks that may be similar based on industry, sector, market capitalization, business model, investor interest, or shared news coverage. Companies and stocks commonly compared with Universal Logistics include Flex LNG (FLNG), Dorian LPG (LPG), Global Ship Lease (GSL), Capital Clean Energy Carriers (CCEC), and Bristow Group (VTOL). These companies are all part of the "transportation" industry.

How does Universal Logistics compare to Flex LNG?

Flex LNG (NYSE:FLNG) and Universal Logistics (NASDAQ:ULH) are both small-cap transportation companies, but which is the superior stock? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, valuation, dividends, media sentiment, risk, profitability, earnings and institutional ownership.

In the previous week, Flex LNG had 1 more articles in the media than Universal Logistics. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for Flex LNG and 0 mentions for Universal Logistics. Flex LNG's average media sentiment score of 0.09 beat Universal Logistics' score of 0.00 indicating that Flex LNG is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Flex LNG Neutral
Universal Logistics Neutral

Flex LNG presently has a consensus target price of $24.00, suggesting a potential downside of 18.04%. Universal Logistics has a consensus target price of $17.00, suggesting a potential upside of 15.57%. Given Universal Logistics' stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Universal Logistics is more favorable than Flex LNG.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Flex LNG
2 Sell rating(s)
2 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
1.50
Universal Logistics
1 Sell rating(s)
2 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
1.67

Flex LNG pays an annual dividend of $3.00 per share and has a dividend yield of 10.2%. Universal Logistics pays an annual dividend of $0.42 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.9%. Flex LNG pays out 214.3% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Universal Logistics pays out -16.7% of its earnings in the form of a dividend.

Flex LNG has a net margin of 22.26% compared to Universal Logistics' net margin of -4.29%. Flex LNG's return on equity of 12.15% beat Universal Logistics' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Flex LNG22.26% 12.15% 3.37%
Universal Logistics -4.29%2.65%0.84%

Flex LNG has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Universal Logistics. Universal Logistics is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Flex LNG, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Flex LNG$347.64M4.56$74.82M$1.4020.92
Universal Logistics$1.56B0.25-$99.87M-$2.51N/A

25.5% of Universal Logistics shares are held by institutional investors. 0.3% of Flex LNG shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 73.5% of Universal Logistics shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Flex LNG has a beta of 0.2, meaning that its share price is 80% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Universal Logistics has a beta of 0.68, meaning that its share price is 32% less volatile than the broader market.

Summary

Flex LNG beats Universal Logistics on 10 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Universal Logistics compare to Dorian LPG?

Dorian LPG (NYSE:LPG) and Universal Logistics (NASDAQ:ULH) are both small-cap transportation companies, but which is the superior investment? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their risk, dividends, earnings, profitability, valuation, media sentiment, institutional ownership and analyst recommendations.

Dorian LPG has a net margin of 40.22% compared to Universal Logistics' net margin of -4.29%. Dorian LPG's return on equity of 18.01% beat Universal Logistics' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Dorian LPG40.22% 18.01% 10.86%
Universal Logistics -4.29%2.65%0.84%

Dorian LPG has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Universal Logistics. Universal Logistics is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Dorian LPG, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Dorian LPG$481.51M3.20$193.67M$4.557.93
Universal Logistics$1.56B0.25-$99.87M-$2.51N/A

62.5% of Dorian LPG shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 25.5% of Universal Logistics shares are owned by institutional investors. 13.6% of Dorian LPG shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 73.5% of Universal Logistics shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Dorian LPG has a beta of 0.66, suggesting that its share price is 34% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Universal Logistics has a beta of 0.68, suggesting that its share price is 32% less volatile than the broader market.

Dorian LPG currently has a consensus target price of $55.00, indicating a potential upside of 52.52%. Universal Logistics has a consensus target price of $17.00, indicating a potential upside of 15.57%. Given Dorian LPG's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, research analysts plainly believe Dorian LPG is more favorable than Universal Logistics.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Dorian LPG
0 Sell rating(s)
3 Hold rating(s)
3 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.50
Universal Logistics
1 Sell rating(s)
2 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
1.67

In the previous week, Dorian LPG had 5 more articles in the media than Universal Logistics. MarketBeat recorded 5 mentions for Dorian LPG and 0 mentions for Universal Logistics. Dorian LPG's average media sentiment score of 0.54 beat Universal Logistics' score of 0.00 indicating that Dorian LPG is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Dorian LPG Positive
Universal Logistics Neutral

Summary

Dorian LPG beats Universal Logistics on 13 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Universal Logistics compare to Global Ship Lease?

Global Ship Lease (NYSE:GSL) and Universal Logistics (NASDAQ:ULH) are both small-cap transportation companies, but which is the better business? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their media sentiment, institutional ownership, risk, earnings, profitability, dividends, valuation and analyst recommendations.

In the previous week, Global Ship Lease's average media sentiment score of 1.67 beat Universal Logistics' score of 0.00 indicating that Global Ship Lease is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Global Ship Lease Very Positive
Universal Logistics Neutral

Global Ship Lease pays an annual dividend of $2.50 per share and has a dividend yield of 6.5%. Universal Logistics pays an annual dividend of $0.42 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.9%. Global Ship Lease pays out 23.7% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Universal Logistics pays out -16.7% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Global Ship Lease has raised its dividend for 2 consecutive years. Global Ship Lease is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

50.1% of Global Ship Lease shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 25.5% of Universal Logistics shares are owned by institutional investors. 73.5% of Universal Logistics shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Global Ship Lease has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Universal Logistics. Universal Logistics is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Global Ship Lease, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Global Ship Lease$766.45M1.79$416.45M$10.533.63
Universal Logistics$1.56B0.25-$99.87M-$2.51N/A

Global Ship Lease has a net margin of 50.01% compared to Universal Logistics' net margin of -4.29%. Global Ship Lease's return on equity of 21.11% beat Universal Logistics' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Global Ship Lease50.01% 21.11% 13.42%
Universal Logistics -4.29%2.65%0.84%

Global Ship Lease has a beta of 0.9, suggesting that its share price is 10% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Universal Logistics has a beta of 0.68, suggesting that its share price is 32% less volatile than the broader market.

Global Ship Lease presently has a consensus target price of $46.50, indicating a potential upside of 21.73%. Universal Logistics has a consensus target price of $17.00, indicating a potential upside of 15.57%. Given Global Ship Lease's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Global Ship Lease is more favorable than Universal Logistics.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Global Ship Lease
1 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
3 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.80
Universal Logistics
1 Sell rating(s)
2 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
1.67

Summary

Global Ship Lease beats Universal Logistics on 16 of the 19 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Universal Logistics compare to Capital Clean Energy Carriers?

Universal Logistics (NASDAQ:ULH) and Capital Clean Energy Carriers (NASDAQ:CCEC) are both small-cap transportation companies, but which is the better investment? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their institutional ownership, earnings, media sentiment, valuation, dividends, profitability, risk and analyst recommendations.

25.5% of Universal Logistics shares are held by institutional investors. 73.5% of Universal Logistics shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

In the previous week, Universal Logistics' average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Capital Clean Energy Carriers'average media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
Universal Logistics Neutral
Capital Clean Energy Carriers Neutral

Universal Logistics has a beta of 0.68, indicating that its stock price is 32% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Capital Clean Energy Carriers has a beta of 0.63, indicating that its stock price is 37% less volatile than the broader market.

Capital Clean Energy Carriers has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Universal Logistics. Universal Logistics is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Capital Clean Energy Carriers, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Universal Logistics$1.56B0.25-$99.87M-$2.51N/A
Capital Clean Energy Carriers$392.71M3.21$170.76M$1.8911.43

Universal Logistics currently has a consensus target price of $17.00, suggesting a potential upside of 15.57%. Capital Clean Energy Carriers has a consensus target price of $24.75, suggesting a potential upside of 14.58%. Given Universal Logistics' higher probable upside, equities research analysts plainly believe Universal Logistics is more favorable than Capital Clean Energy Carriers.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Universal Logistics
1 Sell rating(s)
2 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
1.67
Capital Clean Energy Carriers
0 Sell rating(s)
3 Hold rating(s)
2 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.40

Capital Clean Energy Carriers has a net margin of 28.02% compared to Universal Logistics' net margin of -4.29%. Capital Clean Energy Carriers' return on equity of 6.73% beat Universal Logistics' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Universal Logistics-4.29% 2.65% 0.84%
Capital Clean Energy Carriers 28.02%6.73%2.39%

Universal Logistics pays an annual dividend of $0.42 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.9%. Capital Clean Energy Carriers pays an annual dividend of $0.60 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.8%. Universal Logistics pays out -16.7% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Capital Clean Energy Carriers pays out 31.7% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Universal Logistics is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

Summary

Capital Clean Energy Carriers beats Universal Logistics on 9 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Universal Logistics compare to Bristow Group?

Bristow Group (NYSE:VTOL) and Universal Logistics (NASDAQ:ULH) are both small-cap transportation companies, but which is the superior business? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their earnings, profitability, media sentiment, analyst recommendations, institutional ownership, risk, valuation and dividends.

In the previous week, Bristow Group had 2 more articles in the media than Universal Logistics. MarketBeat recorded 2 mentions for Bristow Group and 0 mentions for Universal Logistics. Bristow Group's average media sentiment score of 0.89 beat Universal Logistics' score of 0.00 indicating that Bristow Group is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Bristow Group Positive
Universal Logistics Neutral

93.3% of Bristow Group shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 25.5% of Universal Logistics shares are held by institutional investors. 13.4% of Bristow Group shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 73.5% of Universal Logistics shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Bristow Group has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Universal Logistics. Universal Logistics is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Bristow Group, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Bristow Group$1.49B0.82$129.07M$3.8410.74
Universal Logistics$1.56B0.25-$99.87M-$2.51N/A

Bristow Group has a beta of 1.23, suggesting that its share price is 23% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Universal Logistics has a beta of 0.68, suggesting that its share price is 32% less volatile than the broader market.

Bristow Group currently has a consensus price target of $60.00, indicating a potential upside of 45.52%. Universal Logistics has a consensus price target of $17.00, indicating a potential upside of 15.57%. Given Bristow Group's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, equities analysts plainly believe Bristow Group is more favorable than Universal Logistics.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Bristow Group
1 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
3 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.50
Universal Logistics
1 Sell rating(s)
2 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
1.67

Bristow Group has a net margin of 7.51% compared to Universal Logistics' net margin of -4.29%. Bristow Group's return on equity of 11.10% beat Universal Logistics' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Bristow Group7.51% 11.10% 4.95%
Universal Logistics -4.29%2.65%0.84%

Bristow Group pays an annual dividend of $0.50 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.2%. Universal Logistics pays an annual dividend of $0.42 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.9%. Bristow Group pays out 13.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Universal Logistics pays out -16.7% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Universal Logistics is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

Summary

Bristow Group beats Universal Logistics on 14 of the 18 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Universal Logistics News Delivered to You Automatically

Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for ULH and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.

Subscribe Now
SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding ULH and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.
Skip Chart

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of NASDAQ and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Skip Chart

ULH vs. The Competition

MetricUniversal LogisticsTRANS IndustryTransportation SectorNASDAQ Exchange
Market Cap$387.90M$7.38B$8.76B$12.46B
Dividend Yield2.86%2.44%974.12%6.52%
P/E Ratio-5.8630.5024.8824.70
Price / Sales0.252.446.0098.72
Price / Cash2.669.998.3649.23
Price / Book0.722.582.256.49
Net Income-$99.87M$243.42M$532.38M$336.25M
7 Day Performance-1.34%1.27%0.00%0.35%
1 Month Performance-14.53%-0.99%-1.20%3.91%
1 Year Performance-48.98%-8.12%24.69%23.88%

Universal Logistics Competitors List

CompanyMarketRankShare PriceAnalysts' Price Target1Y Price PerformanceMarket CapRevenueP/E RatioEmployee CountIndicator(s)
ULH
Universal Logistics
3.3354 of 5 stars
$14.71
flat
$17.00
+15.6%
-49.0%$387.90M$1.56BN/A10,525
FLNG
Flex LNG
1.0717 of 5 stars
$28.08
-4.1%
$24.00
-14.5%
+29.1%$1.52B$347.64M20.068
LPG
Dorian LPG
4.1942 of 5 stars
$34.91
-0.9%
$55.00
+57.6%
+38.9%$1.49B$481.51M7.67540
GSL
Global Ship Lease
4.9531 of 5 stars
$37.63
-0.3%
$46.50
+23.6%
+42.9%$1.35B$757.04M3.577
CCEC
Capital Clean Energy Carriers
4.5498 of 5 stars
$21.35
+2.3%
$24.75
+15.9%
-8.1%$1.25B$392.71M11.30N/A

Related Companies and Tools


This page (NASDAQ:ULH) was last updated on 7/6/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.
From Our Partners