Universal Logistics (ULH) Competitors

$14.20 0.00 (0.00%)

Closing price 05/22/2026 04:00 PM Eastern

Extended Trading

$14.20 0.00 (0.00%)

As of 05/22/2026 06:56 PM Eastern

ULH vs. VTOL, CCEC, LIND, GNK, and ULCC

Should you buy Universal Logistics stock or one of its competitors? MarketBeat compares Universal Logistics with other companies and stocks that may be similar based on industry, sector, market capitalization, business model, investor interest, or shared news coverage. Companies and stocks commonly compared with Universal Logistics include Bristow Group (VTOL), Capital Clean Energy Carriers (CCEC), Lindblad Expeditions (LIND), Genco Shipping & Trading (GNK), and Frontier Group (ULCC). These companies are all part of the "transportation" industry.

How does Universal Logistics compare to Bristow Group?

Universal Logistics (NASDAQ:ULH) and Bristow Group (NYSE:VTOL) are both small-cap transportation companies, but which is the better investment? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their valuation, institutional ownership, profitability, earnings, media sentiment, dividends, risk and analyst recommendations.

Universal Logistics has a beta of 0.79, meaning that its share price is 21% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Bristow Group has a beta of 1.29, meaning that its share price is 29% more volatile than the broader market.

Universal Logistics presently has a consensus price target of $17.00, suggesting a potential upside of 19.72%. Bristow Group has a consensus price target of $60.00, suggesting a potential upside of 40.44%. Given Bristow Group's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Bristow Group is more favorable than Universal Logistics.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Universal Logistics	1 Sell rating(s)	2 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	1.67
Bristow Group	1 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	3 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.50

Bristow Group has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Universal Logistics. Universal Logistics is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Bristow Group, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Universal Logistics	$1.56B	0.24	-$99.87M	-$2.51	N/A
Bristow Group	$1.49B	0.85	$129.07M	$3.84	11.13

In the previous week, Universal Logistics and Universal Logistics both had 1 articles in the media. Bristow Group's average media sentiment score of 0.00 beat Universal Logistics' score of -0.55 indicating that Bristow Group is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Universal Logistics	0 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	0 Neutral mention(s)	1 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Negative
Bristow Group	0 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	1 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Neutral

Universal Logistics pays an annual dividend of $0.42 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.0%. Bristow Group pays an annual dividend of $0.50 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.2%. Universal Logistics pays out -16.7% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Bristow Group pays out 13.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Universal Logistics is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

25.5% of Universal Logistics shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 93.3% of Bristow Group shares are owned by institutional investors. 73.5% of Universal Logistics shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 13.4% of Bristow Group shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Bristow Group has a net margin of 7.51% compared to Universal Logistics' net margin of -4.29%. Bristow Group's return on equity of 11.10% beat Universal Logistics' return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Universal Logistics	-4.29%	2.65%	0.84%
Bristow Group	7.51%	11.10%	4.95%

Summary

Bristow Group beats Universal Logistics on 13 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Universal Logistics compare to Capital Clean Energy Carriers?

Capital Clean Energy Carriers (NASDAQ:CCEC) and Universal Logistics (NASDAQ:ULH) are both small-cap transportation companies, but which is the superior stock? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their dividends, risk, institutional ownership, media sentiment, earnings, analyst recommendations, valuation and profitability.

Capital Clean Energy Carriers pays an annual dividend of $0.60 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.7%. Universal Logistics pays an annual dividend of $0.42 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.0%. Capital Clean Energy Carriers pays out 31.7% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Universal Logistics pays out -16.7% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Universal Logistics is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

25.5% of Universal Logistics shares are owned by institutional investors. 73.5% of Universal Logistics shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

In the previous week, Capital Clean Energy Carriers and Capital Clean Energy Carriers both had 1 articles in the media. Capital Clean Energy Carriers' average media sentiment score of 1.30 beat Universal Logistics' score of -0.55 indicating that Capital Clean Energy Carriers is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Capital Clean Energy Carriers	1 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	0 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive
Universal Logistics	0 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	0 Neutral mention(s)	1 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Negative

Capital Clean Energy Carriers has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Universal Logistics. Universal Logistics is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Capital Clean Energy Carriers, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Capital Clean Energy Carriers	$392.71M	3.32	$170.76M	$1.89	11.80
Universal Logistics	$1.56B	0.24	-$99.87M	-$2.51	N/A

Capital Clean Energy Carriers currently has a consensus price target of $24.75, indicating a potential upside of 10.94%. Universal Logistics has a consensus price target of $17.00, indicating a potential upside of 19.72%. Given Universal Logistics' higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Universal Logistics is more favorable than Capital Clean Energy Carriers.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Capital Clean Energy Carriers	0 Sell rating(s)	3 Hold rating(s)	2 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.40
Universal Logistics	1 Sell rating(s)	2 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	1.67

Capital Clean Energy Carriers has a net margin of 28.02% compared to Universal Logistics' net margin of -4.29%. Capital Clean Energy Carriers' return on equity of 6.73% beat Universal Logistics' return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Capital Clean Energy Carriers	28.02%	6.73%	2.39%
Universal Logistics	-4.29%	2.65%	0.84%

Capital Clean Energy Carriers has a beta of 0.59, suggesting that its share price is 41% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Universal Logistics has a beta of 0.79, suggesting that its share price is 21% less volatile than the broader market.

Summary

Capital Clean Energy Carriers beats Universal Logistics on 10 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Universal Logistics compare to Lindblad Expeditions?

Lindblad Expeditions (NASDAQ:LIND) and Universal Logistics (NASDAQ:ULH) are both small-cap transportation companies, but which is the superior stock? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their earnings, institutional ownership, dividends, media sentiment, risk, valuation, profitability and analyst recommendations.

Lindblad Expeditions currently has a consensus target price of $24.33, indicating a potential upside of 18.30%. Universal Logistics has a consensus target price of $17.00, indicating a potential upside of 19.72%. Given Universal Logistics' higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Universal Logistics is more favorable than Lindblad Expeditions.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Lindblad Expeditions	1 Sell rating(s)	1 Hold rating(s)	4 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.50
Universal Logistics	1 Sell rating(s)	2 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	1.67

In the previous week, Lindblad Expeditions had 7 more articles in the media than Universal Logistics. MarketBeat recorded 8 mentions for Lindblad Expeditions and 1 mentions for Universal Logistics. Lindblad Expeditions' average media sentiment score of -0.14 beat Universal Logistics' score of -0.55 indicating that Lindblad Expeditions is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Lindblad Expeditions	1 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	5 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Neutral
Universal Logistics	0 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	0 Neutral mention(s)	1 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Negative

Lindblad Expeditions has a beta of 2.21, suggesting that its share price is 121% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Universal Logistics has a beta of 0.79, suggesting that its share price is 21% less volatile than the broader market.

Lindblad Expeditions has a net margin of -2.86% compared to Universal Logistics' net margin of -4.29%. Universal Logistics' return on equity of 2.65% beat Lindblad Expeditions' return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Lindblad Expeditions	-2.86%	N/A	-0.44%
Universal Logistics	-4.29%	2.65%	0.84%

75.9% of Lindblad Expeditions shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 25.5% of Universal Logistics shares are owned by institutional investors. 26.1% of Lindblad Expeditions shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 73.5% of Universal Logistics shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Lindblad Expeditions has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Universal Logistics. Lindblad Expeditions is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Universal Logistics, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Lindblad Expeditions	$771.02M	1.75	-$29.72M	-$0.54	N/A
Universal Logistics	$1.56B	0.24	-$99.87M	-$2.51	N/A

Summary

Lindblad Expeditions beats Universal Logistics on 10 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Universal Logistics compare to Genco Shipping & Trading?

Universal Logistics (NASDAQ:ULH) and Genco Shipping & Trading (NYSE:GNK) are both small-cap transportation companies, but which is the better business? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their earnings, risk, institutional ownership, profitability, valuation, analyst recommendations, media sentiment and dividends.

In the previous week, Genco Shipping & Trading had 4 more articles in the media than Universal Logistics. MarketBeat recorded 5 mentions for Genco Shipping & Trading and 1 mentions for Universal Logistics. Genco Shipping & Trading's average media sentiment score of 0.18 beat Universal Logistics' score of -0.55 indicating that Genco Shipping & Trading is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Universal Logistics	0 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	0 Neutral mention(s)	1 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Negative
Genco Shipping & Trading	0 Very Positive mention(s)	1 Positive mention(s)	2 Neutral mention(s)	1 Negative mention(s)	1 Very Negative mention(s)	Neutral

Universal Logistics presently has a consensus price target of $17.00, suggesting a potential upside of 19.72%. Genco Shipping & Trading has a consensus price target of $23.67, suggesting a potential upside of 1.17%. Given Universal Logistics' higher possible upside, equities analysts plainly believe Universal Logistics is more favorable than Genco Shipping & Trading.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Universal Logistics	1 Sell rating(s)	2 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	1.67
Genco Shipping & Trading	0 Sell rating(s)	3 Hold rating(s)	2 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.40

Universal Logistics has a beta of 0.79, meaning that its stock price is 21% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Genco Shipping & Trading has a beta of 0.97, meaning that its stock price is 3% less volatile than the broader market.

Genco Shipping & Trading has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Universal Logistics. Universal Logistics is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Genco Shipping & Trading, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Universal Logistics	$1.56B	0.24	-$99.87M	-$2.51	N/A
Genco Shipping & Trading	$342.05M	2.98	-$4.37M	$0.38	61.56

25.5% of Universal Logistics shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 58.6% of Genco Shipping & Trading shares are owned by institutional investors. 73.5% of Universal Logistics shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 2.4% of Genco Shipping & Trading shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Universal Logistics pays an annual dividend of $0.42 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.0%. Genco Shipping & Trading pays an annual dividend of $1.40 per share and has a dividend yield of 6.0%. Universal Logistics pays out -16.7% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Genco Shipping & Trading pays out 368.4% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future.

Genco Shipping & Trading has a net margin of 4.38% compared to Universal Logistics' net margin of -4.29%. Universal Logistics' return on equity of 2.65% beat Genco Shipping & Trading's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Universal Logistics	-4.29%	2.65%	0.84%
Genco Shipping & Trading	4.38%	2.49%	1.95%

Summary

Genco Shipping & Trading beats Universal Logistics on 13 of the 18 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Universal Logistics compare to Frontier Group?

Universal Logistics (NASDAQ:ULH) and Frontier Group (NASDAQ:ULCC) are both small-cap transportation companies, but which is the superior investment? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their institutional ownership, media sentiment, dividends, analyst recommendations, earnings, risk, profitability and valuation.

Universal Logistics has a beta of 0.79, indicating that its share price is 21% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Frontier Group has a beta of 2.41, indicating that its share price is 141% more volatile than the broader market.

Universal Logistics presently has a consensus price target of $17.00, indicating a potential upside of 19.72%. Frontier Group has a consensus price target of $5.07, indicating a potential upside of 2.45%. Given Universal Logistics' stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, equities research analysts clearly believe Universal Logistics is more favorable than Frontier Group.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Universal Logistics	1 Sell rating(s)	2 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	1.67
Frontier Group	3 Sell rating(s)	5 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	1.63

In the previous week, Frontier Group had 4 more articles in the media than Universal Logistics. MarketBeat recorded 5 mentions for Frontier Group and 1 mentions for Universal Logistics. Frontier Group's average media sentiment score of 0.68 beat Universal Logistics' score of -0.55 indicating that Frontier Group is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Universal Logistics	0 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	0 Neutral mention(s)	1 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Negative
Frontier Group	2 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	2 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive

Universal Logistics has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Frontier Group. Universal Logistics is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Frontier Group, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Universal Logistics	$1.56B	0.24	-$99.87M	-$2.51	N/A
Frontier Group	$3.72B	0.31	-$137M	-$1.60	N/A

Universal Logistics has a net margin of -4.29% compared to Frontier Group's net margin of -9.62%. Universal Logistics' return on equity of 2.65% beat Frontier Group's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Universal Logistics	-4.29%	2.65%	0.84%
Frontier Group	-9.62%	-39.20%	-2.36%

25.5% of Universal Logistics shares are owned by institutional investors. 73.5% of Universal Logistics shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 48.0% of Frontier Group shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Summary

Universal Logistics beats Frontier Group on 8 of the 15 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Universal Logistics News Delivered to You Automatically

Subscribe Now

SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding ULH and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of NASDAQ and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.

ULH vs. The Competition

Export

Metric	Universal Logistics	TRANS Industry	Transportation Sector	NASDAQ Exchange
Market Cap	$374.45M	$6.86B	$8.53B	$12.34B
Dividend Yield	2.96%	2.67%	956.00%	5.28%
P/E Ratio	-5.66	19.63	21.28	22.89
Price / Sales	0.24	1.97	7.65	86.28
Price / Cash	2.57	9.34	8.34	56.67
Price / Book	0.70	2.43	2.28	7.14
Net Income	-$99.87M	$257.31M	$539.59M	$335.98M
7 Day Performance	10.76%	1.68%	1.99%	3.56%
1 Month Performance	-40.01%	-8.49%	1.32%	2.54%
1 Year Performance	-38.34%	1.36%	37.57%	35.05%

Universal Logistics Competitors List

Export

Company	MarketRank	Share Price	Analysts' Price Target	1Y Price Performance	Market Cap	Revenue	P/E Ratio	Employee Count	Indicator(s)
ULH Universal Logistics	4.078 of 5 stars	$14.20 flat	$17.00 +19.7%	-38.3%	$374.45M	$1.56B	N/A	10,525	Gap Up
VTOL Bristow Group	4.2356 of 5 stars	$42.08 -1.0%	$60.00 +42.6%	+47.6%	$1.25B	$1.49B	10.96	3,660
CCEC Capital Clean Energy Carriers	4.7207 of 5 stars	$20.91 -0.4%	$24.75 +18.4%	-3.7%	$1.22B	$388.68M	11.06	N/A	Positive News
LIND Lindblad Expeditions	2.8407 of 5 stars	$18.46 -3.7%	$22.25 +20.5%	+101.9%	$1.21B	$771.02M	N/A	1,550	Insider Trade Gap Down
GNK Genco Shipping & Trading	2.0207 of 5 stars	$23.77 -2.7%	$23.67 -0.4%	+76.4%	$1.04B	$342.05M	62.54	1,010	Gap Up

Related Companies and Tools

Related Companies

Top 10 Stock Comparisons

This page (NASDAQ:ULH) was last updated on 5/25/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.

From Our Partners

Get 30 Days of MarketBeat All Access for Free

Start Your 30-Day Trial

In-depth profiles and analysis for 20,000 public companies.
Real-time analyst ratings, insider transactions, earnings data, and more.
Our daily ratings and market update email newsletter.

Sign In
Create Account

Your Email Address:

Your Password:

Forgot your password?

Your Email Address:

Choose a Password:

By creating a free account, you agree to our terms of service. This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

Universal Logistics (ULH) Competitors

ULH vs. VTOL, CCEC, LIND, GNK, and ULCC

How does Universal Logistics compare to Bristow Group?

Summary

How does Universal Logistics compare to Capital Clean Energy Carriers?

Summary

How does Universal Logistics compare to Lindblad Expeditions?

Summary

How does Universal Logistics compare to Genco Shipping & Trading?

Summary

How does Universal Logistics compare to Frontier Group?

Summary

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

Media Sentiment Over Time

ULH vs. The Competition

Universal Logistics Competitors List

Related Companies and Tools

Best-in-Class Portfolio Monitoring

Stock Ideas and Recommendations

Advanced Stock Screeners and Research Tools

About MarketBeat

MarketBeat Products

Popular Tools

Financial Calendars

Terms & Info

Universal Logistics (ULH) Competitors

ULH vs. VTOL, CCEC, LIND, GNK, and ULCC

How does Universal Logistics compare to Bristow Group?

Which has more volatility & risk, ULH or VTOL?

Do analysts recommend ULH or VTOL?

Which has better valuation & earnings, ULH or VTOL?

Does the media prefer ULH or VTOL?

Is ULH or VTOL a better dividend stock?

Do institutionals & insiders hold more shares of ULH or VTOL?

Is ULH or VTOL more profitable?

Summary

How does Universal Logistics compare to Capital Clean Energy Carriers?

Is CCEC or ULH a better dividend stock?

Do institutionals and insiders hold more shares of CCEC or ULH?

Does the media favor CCEC or ULH?

Which has better valuation & earnings, CCEC or ULH?

Do analysts recommend CCEC or ULH?

Is CCEC or ULH more profitable?

Which has more volatility and risk, CCEC or ULH?

Summary

How does Universal Logistics compare to Lindblad Expeditions?

Do analysts rate LIND or ULH?

Does the media refer more to LIND or ULH?

Which has more risk & volatility, LIND or ULH?

Is LIND or ULH more profitable?

Do institutionals & insiders have more ownership in LIND or ULH?

Which has better earnings & valuation, LIND or ULH?

Summary

How does Universal Logistics compare to Genco Shipping & Trading?

Does the media prefer ULH or GNK?

Do analysts rate ULH or GNK?

Which has more volatility & risk, ULH or GNK?

Which has better earnings and valuation, ULH or GNK?

Do institutionals & insiders have more ownership in ULH or GNK?

Is ULH or GNK a better dividend stock?

Is ULH or GNK more profitable?

Summary

How does Universal Logistics compare to Frontier Group?

Which has more volatility and risk, ULH or ULCC?

Do analysts prefer ULH or ULCC?

Does the media refer more to ULH or ULCC?

Which has preferable valuation & earnings, ULH or ULCC?

Is ULH or ULCC more profitable?

Do insiders & institutionals have more ownership in ULH or ULCC?

Summary

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

Media Sentiment Over Time

ULH vs. The Competition

Universal Logistics Competitors List

Related Companies and Tools

MarketBeat All Access Features

Best-in-Class Portfolio Monitoring

Stock Ideas and Recommendations

Advanced Stock Screeners and Research Tools