Free Trial

Universal Logistics (ULH) Competitors

Universal Logistics logo
$12.28 -3.85 (-23.87%)
Closing price 04:00 PM Eastern
Extended Trading
$12.37 +0.09 (+0.73%)
As of 06:44 PM Eastern
Extended trading is trading that happens on electronic markets outside of regular trading hours. This is a fair market value extended hours price provided by Massive. Learn more.

ULH vs. VRRM, DAC, GEL, NMM, and AERO

Should you be buying Universal Logistics stock or one of its competitors? The main competitors of Universal Logistics include Verra Mobility (VRRM), Danaos (DAC), Genesis Energy (GEL), Navios Maritime Partners (NMM), and Grupo Aeromexico (AERO). These companies are all part of the "transportation" industry.

How does Universal Logistics compare to Verra Mobility?

Verra Mobility (NASDAQ:VRRM) and Universal Logistics (NASDAQ:ULH) are both transportation companies, but which is the superior investment? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, institutional ownership, profitability, valuation, dividends, earnings, risk and media sentiment.

Verra Mobility has a beta of 0.67, suggesting that its stock price is 33% less volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Universal Logistics has a beta of 0.79, suggesting that its stock price is 21% less volatile than the S&P 500.

Verra Mobility currently has a consensus price target of $23.50, suggesting a potential upside of 62.07%. Universal Logistics has a consensus price target of $17.00, suggesting a potential upside of 38.44%. Given Verra Mobility's higher probable upside, research analysts plainly believe Verra Mobility is more favorable than Universal Logistics.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Verra Mobility
1 Sell rating(s)
2 Hold rating(s)
2 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.20
Universal Logistics
1 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.33

25.5% of Universal Logistics shares are owned by institutional investors. 1.3% of Verra Mobility shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 73.5% of Universal Logistics shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

In the previous week, Universal Logistics had 2 more articles in the media than Verra Mobility. MarketBeat recorded 8 mentions for Universal Logistics and 6 mentions for Verra Mobility. Verra Mobility's average media sentiment score of 0.92 beat Universal Logistics' score of 0.20 indicating that Verra Mobility is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Verra Mobility
2 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
4 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
Universal Logistics
1 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
2 Neutral mention(s)
1 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral

Verra Mobility has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Universal Logistics. Universal Logistics is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Verra Mobility, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Verra Mobility$979.08M2.24$136.63M$0.8517.06
Universal Logistics$1.54B0.21-$99.87M-$2.51N/A

Verra Mobility has a net margin of 13.95% compared to Universal Logistics' net margin of -4.29%. Verra Mobility's return on equity of 57.45% beat Universal Logistics' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Verra Mobility13.95% 57.45% 11.45%
Universal Logistics -4.29%2.61%0.83%

Summary

Verra Mobility beats Universal Logistics on 10 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Universal Logistics compare to Danaos?

Danaos (NYSE:DAC) and Universal Logistics (NASDAQ:ULH) are both transportation companies, but which is the better investment? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, institutional ownership, profitability, risk, dividends, valuation, media sentiment and earnings.

Danaos has a beta of 0.9, suggesting that its share price is 10% less volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Universal Logistics has a beta of 0.79, suggesting that its share price is 21% less volatile than the S&P 500.

Danaos has a net margin of 47.45% compared to Universal Logistics' net margin of -4.29%. Danaos' return on equity of 13.31% beat Universal Logistics' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Danaos47.45% 13.31% 10.40%
Universal Logistics -4.29%2.61%0.83%

Danaos pays an annual dividend of $3.60 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.8%. Universal Logistics pays an annual dividend of $0.42 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.4%. Danaos pays out 13.4% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Universal Logistics pays out -16.7% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Danaos has increased its dividend for 3 consecutive years. Universal Logistics is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

Danaos presently has a consensus price target of $105.00, suggesting a potential downside of 17.54%. Universal Logistics has a consensus price target of $17.00, suggesting a potential upside of 38.44%. Given Universal Logistics' higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Universal Logistics is more favorable than Danaos.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Danaos
0 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
2 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00
Universal Logistics
1 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.33

19.0% of Danaos shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 25.5% of Universal Logistics shares are owned by institutional investors. 41.0% of Danaos shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 73.5% of Universal Logistics shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

In the previous week, Universal Logistics had 1 more articles in the media than Danaos. MarketBeat recorded 8 mentions for Universal Logistics and 7 mentions for Danaos. Danaos' average media sentiment score of 0.63 beat Universal Logistics' score of 0.20 indicating that Danaos is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Danaos
1 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
4 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
Universal Logistics
1 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
2 Neutral mention(s)
1 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral

Danaos has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Universal Logistics. Universal Logistics is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Danaos, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Danaos$1.04B2.22$494.61M$26.784.75
Universal Logistics$1.54B0.21-$99.87M-$2.51N/A

Summary

Danaos beats Universal Logistics on 12 of the 19 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Universal Logistics compare to Genesis Energy?

Genesis Energy (NYSE:GEL) and Universal Logistics (NASDAQ:ULH) are both transportation companies, but which is the better investment? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, institutional ownership, profitability, risk, dividends, valuation, media sentiment and earnings.

Genesis Energy has a beta of 0.69, suggesting that its share price is 31% less volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Universal Logistics has a beta of 0.79, suggesting that its share price is 21% less volatile than the S&P 500.

Genesis Energy presently has a consensus price target of $19.50, suggesting a potential upside of 15.43%. Universal Logistics has a consensus price target of $17.00, suggesting a potential upside of 38.44%. Given Universal Logistics' higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Universal Logistics is more favorable than Genesis Energy.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Genesis Energy
0 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
2 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.67
Universal Logistics
1 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.33

Universal Logistics has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Genesis Energy. Universal Logistics is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Genesis Energy, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Genesis Energy$1.63B1.27-$440.40M-$4.19N/A
Universal Logistics$1.54B0.21-$99.87M-$2.51N/A

In the previous week, Universal Logistics had 6 more articles in the media than Genesis Energy. MarketBeat recorded 8 mentions for Universal Logistics and 2 mentions for Genesis Energy. Genesis Energy's average media sentiment score of 1.12 beat Universal Logistics' score of 0.20 indicating that Genesis Energy is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Genesis Energy
1 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
Universal Logistics
1 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
2 Neutral mention(s)
1 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral

Genesis Energy pays an annual dividend of $0.72 per share and has a dividend yield of 4.3%. Universal Logistics pays an annual dividend of $0.42 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.4%. Genesis Energy pays out -17.2% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Universal Logistics pays out -16.7% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Genesis Energy has increased its dividend for 1 consecutive years. Genesis Energy is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

Universal Logistics has a net margin of -4.29% compared to Genesis Energy's net margin of -27.01%. Universal Logistics' return on equity of 2.61% beat Genesis Energy's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Genesis Energy-27.01% -10.04% -0.34%
Universal Logistics -4.29%2.61%0.83%

66.8% of Genesis Energy shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 25.5% of Universal Logistics shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.7% of Genesis Energy shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 73.5% of Universal Logistics shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Summary

Genesis Energy and Universal Logistics tied by winning 10 of the 20 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Universal Logistics compare to Navios Maritime Partners?

Universal Logistics (NASDAQ:ULH) and Navios Maritime Partners (NYSE:NMM) are both transportation companies, but which is the better stock? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, media sentiment, dividends, earnings, valuation, profitability, risk and institutional ownership.

Navios Maritime Partners has a net margin of 21.23% compared to Universal Logistics' net margin of -4.29%. Navios Maritime Partners' return on equity of 9.17% beat Universal Logistics' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Universal Logistics-4.29% 2.61% 0.83%
Navios Maritime Partners 21.23%9.17%5.04%

Universal Logistics has a beta of 0.79, indicating that its share price is 21% less volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Navios Maritime Partners has a beta of 1.06, indicating that its share price is 6% more volatile than the S&P 500.

25.5% of Universal Logistics shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 62.7% of Navios Maritime Partners shares are owned by institutional investors. 73.5% of Universal Logistics shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Universal Logistics pays an annual dividend of $0.42 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.4%. Navios Maritime Partners pays an annual dividend of $0.24 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.3%. Universal Logistics pays out -16.7% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Navios Maritime Partners pays out 2.5% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Universal Logistics is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

Navios Maritime Partners has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Universal Logistics. Universal Logistics is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Navios Maritime Partners, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Universal Logistics$1.54B0.21-$99.87M-$2.51N/A
Navios Maritime Partners$1.34B1.63$285.33M$9.617.97

In the previous week, Navios Maritime Partners had 11 more articles in the media than Universal Logistics. MarketBeat recorded 19 mentions for Navios Maritime Partners and 8 mentions for Universal Logistics. Navios Maritime Partners' average media sentiment score of 1.58 beat Universal Logistics' score of 0.20 indicating that Navios Maritime Partners is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Universal Logistics
1 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
2 Neutral mention(s)
1 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral
Navios Maritime Partners
9 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
2 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Very Positive

Universal Logistics presently has a consensus price target of $17.00, suggesting a potential upside of 38.44%. Navios Maritime Partners has a consensus price target of $85.00, suggesting a potential upside of 10.92%. Given Universal Logistics' higher possible upside, research analysts plainly believe Universal Logistics is more favorable than Navios Maritime Partners.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Universal Logistics
1 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.33
Navios Maritime Partners
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
2 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00

Summary

Navios Maritime Partners beats Universal Logistics on 13 of the 19 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Universal Logistics compare to Grupo Aeromexico?

Universal Logistics (NASDAQ:ULH) and Grupo Aeromexico (NYSE:AERO) are both transportation companies, but which is the superior stock? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their valuation, analyst recommendations, media sentiment, earnings, risk, dividends, profitability and institutional ownership.

Universal Logistics currently has a consensus price target of $17.00, suggesting a potential upside of 38.44%. Grupo Aeromexico has a consensus price target of $29.43, suggesting a potential upside of 87.50%. Given Grupo Aeromexico's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Grupo Aeromexico is more favorable than Universal Logistics.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Universal Logistics
1 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.33
Grupo Aeromexico
1 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
7 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.80

Grupo Aeromexico has a net margin of 6.17% compared to Universal Logistics' net margin of -4.29%. Universal Logistics' return on equity of 2.61% beat Grupo Aeromexico's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Universal Logistics-4.29% 2.61% 0.83%
Grupo Aeromexico 6.17%-41.04%4.12%

Grupo Aeromexico has higher revenue and earnings than Universal Logistics. Universal Logistics is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Grupo Aeromexico, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Universal Logistics$1.54B0.21-$99.87M-$2.51N/A
Grupo Aeromexico$5.36B0.40$351.86M$0.8219.14

25.5% of Universal Logistics shares are owned by institutional investors. 73.5% of Universal Logistics shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

In the previous week, Universal Logistics had 2 more articles in the media than Grupo Aeromexico. MarketBeat recorded 8 mentions for Universal Logistics and 6 mentions for Grupo Aeromexico. Grupo Aeromexico's average media sentiment score of 0.49 beat Universal Logistics' score of 0.20 indicating that Grupo Aeromexico is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Universal Logistics
1 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
2 Neutral mention(s)
1 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral
Grupo Aeromexico
0 Very Positive mention(s)
2 Positive mention(s)
4 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral

Summary

Grupo Aeromexico beats Universal Logistics on 11 of the 15 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Universal Logistics News Delivered to You Automatically

Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for ULH and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.

Subscribe Now
SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding ULH and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.
Skip Chart

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of NASDAQ and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Skip Chart

ULH vs. The Competition

MetricUniversal LogisticsTRANS IndustryTransportation SectorNASDAQ Exchange
Market Cap$323.58M$6.68B$8.12B$11.87B
Dividend Yield1.74%2.57%345.17%5.21%
P/E Ratio-4.8918.9422.7528.47
Price / Sales0.211.844.6560.94
Price / Cash4.0510.318.4036.52
Price / Book0.602.682.186.67
Net Income-$99.87M$256.91M$533.74M$332.53M
7 Day Performance-49.53%-3.49%0.54%2.01%
1 Month Performance-42.80%2.22%4.55%9.20%
1 Year Performance-45.35%4.76%40.36%39.59%

Universal Logistics Competitors List

CompanyMarketRankShare PriceAnalysts' Price Target1Y Price PerformanceMarket CapRevenueP/E RatioEmployee CountIndicator(s)
ULH
Universal Logistics
4.3061 of 5 stars
$12.28
-23.9%
$17.00
+38.4%
N/A$323.58M$1.54BN/A10,525
VRRM
Verra Mobility
4.1414 of 5 stars
$15.27
+1.3%
$23.50
+53.9%
N/A$2.31B$979.08M17.961,901
DAC
Danaos
2.1725 of 5 stars
$121.01
+0.5%
$105.00
-13.2%
N/A$2.20B$1.04B4.524,116
GEL
Genesis Energy
2.3374 of 5 stars
$17.23
+1.8%
$19.50
+13.2%
N/A$2.11B$1.63BN/A1,061
NMM
Navios Maritime Partners
4.2061 of 5 stars
$71.91
-1.2%
$85.00
+18.2%
N/A$2.06B$1.34B7.48186

Related Companies and Tools


This page (NASDAQ:ULH) was last updated on 5/5/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.
From Our Partners