Go Pro

Genesis Energy (GEL) Competitors

Genesis Energy logo
$15.02 +0.37 (+2.53%)
As of 09/21/2026 03:56 PM Eastern

GEL vs. SOBO, PAGP, GLNG, INSW, and HAFN

Should you buy Genesis Energy stock or one of its competitors? Genesis Energy's main competitors and comparable companies include South Bow (SOBO), Plains GP (PAGP), Golar LNG (GLNG), International Seaways (INSW), and Hafnia (HAFN). Companies are selected based on similarities in market, industry, and size. These companies are all part of the "oil & gas storage & transportation" industry.

How does Genesis Energy compare to South Bow?

South Bow (NYSE:SOBO) and Genesis Energy (NYSE:GEL) are both energy companies, but which is the better stock? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their dividends, earnings, profitability, institutional ownership, risk, valuation, media sentiment and analyst recommendations.

South Bow has a net margin of 22.99% compared to Genesis Energy's net margin of 4.29%. Genesis Energy's return on equity of 55.96% beat South Bow's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
South Bow22.99% 15.84% 3.73%
Genesis Energy 4.29%55.96%1.58%

South Bow has higher revenue and earnings than Genesis Energy. South Bow is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Genesis Energy, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
South Bow$1.99B3.68$433M$2.2115.86
Genesis Energy$1.63B1.13-$440.40M$0.1979.05

South Bow has a beta of 0.14, suggesting that its stock price is 86% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Genesis Energy has a beta of 0.67, suggesting that its stock price is 33% less volatile than the broader market.

South Bow pays an annual dividend of $2.00 per share and has a dividend yield of 5.7%. Genesis Energy pays an annual dividend of $0.80 per share and has a dividend yield of 5.3%. South Bow pays out 90.5% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Genesis Energy pays out 421.1% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Genesis Energy has raised its dividend for 1 consecutive years. South Bow is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

South Bow presently has a consensus price target of $33.00, suggesting a potential downside of 5.88%. Genesis Energy has a consensus price target of $18.00, suggesting a potential upside of 19.84%. Given Genesis Energy's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Genesis Energy is more favorable than South Bow.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
South Bow
3 Sell rating(s)
8 Hold rating(s)
4 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.07
Genesis Energy
0 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
2 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.67

In the previous week, South Bow had 5 more articles in the media than Genesis Energy. MarketBeat recorded 5 mentions for South Bow and 0 mentions for Genesis Energy. Genesis Energy's average media sentiment score of 0.00 beat South Bow's score of 0.00 indicating that Genesis Energy is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Overall Sentiment
South Bow Neutral
Genesis Energy Neutral

66.8% of Genesis Energy shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.7% of Genesis Energy shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Summary

South Bow beats Genesis Energy on 10 of the 19 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Genesis Energy compare to Plains GP?

Genesis Energy (NYSE:GEL) and Plains GP (NYSE:PAGP) are both energy companies, but which is the better business? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their valuation, earnings, profitability, dividends, risk, institutional ownership, media sentiment and analyst recommendations.

Genesis Energy has a beta of 0.67, suggesting that its share price is 33% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Plains GP has a beta of 0.48, suggesting that its share price is 52% less volatile than the broader market.

66.8% of Genesis Energy shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 88.3% of Plains GP shares are held by institutional investors. 0.7% of Genesis Energy shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 6.9% of Plains GP shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Plains GP has higher revenue and earnings than Genesis Energy. Plains GP is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Genesis Energy, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Genesis Energy$1.63B1.13-$440.40M$0.1979.05
Plains GP$52.31B0.10$103M$2.799.80

In the previous week, Plains GP had 10 more articles in the media than Genesis Energy. MarketBeat recorded 10 mentions for Plains GP and 0 mentions for Genesis Energy. Plains GP's average media sentiment score of 0.99 beat Genesis Energy's score of 0.00 indicating that Plains GP is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Genesis Energy Neutral
Plains GP Positive

Genesis Energy pays an annual dividend of $0.80 per share and has a dividend yield of 5.3%. Plains GP pays an annual dividend of $1.67 per share and has a dividend yield of 6.1%. Genesis Energy pays out 421.1% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Plains GP pays out 59.9% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Genesis Energy has raised its dividend for 1 consecutive years. Plains GP is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

Genesis Energy has a net margin of 4.29% compared to Plains GP's net margin of 0.21%. Genesis Energy's return on equity of 55.96% beat Plains GP's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Genesis Energy4.29% 55.96% 1.58%
Plains GP 0.21%0.70%0.36%

Genesis Energy presently has a consensus price target of $18.00, indicating a potential upside of 19.84%. Plains GP has a consensus price target of $24.91, indicating a potential downside of 8.86%. Given Genesis Energy's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Genesis Energy is more favorable than Plains GP.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Genesis Energy
0 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
2 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.67
Plains GP
2 Sell rating(s)
6 Hold rating(s)
4 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.31

Summary

Plains GP beats Genesis Energy on 11 of the 20 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Genesis Energy compare to Golar LNG?

Golar LNG (NASDAQ:GLNG) and Genesis Energy (NYSE:GEL) are both energy companies, but which is the better investment? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their dividends, media sentiment, valuation, profitability, earnings, risk, institutional ownership and analyst recommendations.

Golar LNG currently has a consensus target price of $63.00, indicating a potential upside of 22.66%. Genesis Energy has a consensus target price of $18.00, indicating a potential upside of 19.84%. Given Golar LNG's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, equities analysts clearly believe Golar LNG is more favorable than Genesis Energy.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Golar LNG
0 Sell rating(s)
2 Hold rating(s)
4 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.86
Genesis Energy
0 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
2 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.67

In the previous week, Golar LNG had 5 more articles in the media than Genesis Energy. MarketBeat recorded 5 mentions for Golar LNG and 0 mentions for Genesis Energy. Golar LNG's average media sentiment score of 0.60 beat Genesis Energy's score of 0.00 indicating that Golar LNG is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Golar LNG Positive
Genesis Energy Neutral

Golar LNG has a net margin of 31.27% compared to Genesis Energy's net margin of 4.29%. Genesis Energy's return on equity of 55.96% beat Golar LNG's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Golar LNG31.27% 8.91% 3.75%
Genesis Energy 4.29%55.96%1.58%

92.2% of Golar LNG shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 66.8% of Genesis Energy shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.0% of Golar LNG shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 0.7% of Genesis Energy shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Golar LNG has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Genesis Energy. Golar LNG is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Genesis Energy, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Golar LNG$393.52M13.22$65.68M$1.6032.10
Genesis Energy$1.63B1.13-$440.40M$0.1979.05

Golar LNG has a beta of 0.05, suggesting that its share price is 95% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Genesis Energy has a beta of 0.67, suggesting that its share price is 33% less volatile than the broader market.

Golar LNG pays an annual dividend of $1.00 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.9%. Genesis Energy pays an annual dividend of $0.80 per share and has a dividend yield of 5.3%. Golar LNG pays out 62.5% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Genesis Energy pays out 421.1% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Golar LNG has increased its dividend for 2 consecutive years and Genesis Energy has increased its dividend for 1 consecutive years.

Summary

Golar LNG beats Genesis Energy on 14 of the 20 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Genesis Energy compare to International Seaways?

Genesis Energy (NYSE:GEL) and International Seaways (NYSE:INSW) are both energy companies, but which is the superior stock? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their profitability, media sentiment, valuation, earnings, analyst recommendations, dividends, institutional ownership and risk.

International Seaways has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Genesis Energy. International Seaways is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Genesis Energy, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Genesis Energy$1.63B1.13-$440.40M$0.1979.05
International Seaways$843.30M6.39$309.26M$15.646.96

International Seaways has a net margin of 61.98% compared to Genesis Energy's net margin of 4.29%. Genesis Energy's return on equity of 55.96% beat International Seaways' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Genesis Energy4.29% 55.96% 1.58%
International Seaways 61.98%31.75%23.54%

Genesis Energy pays an annual dividend of $0.80 per share and has a dividend yield of 5.3%. International Seaways pays an annual dividend of $20.20 per share and has a dividend yield of 18.6%. Genesis Energy pays out 421.1% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. International Seaways pays out 129.2% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Genesis Energy has increased its dividend for 1 consecutive years. International Seaways is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

66.8% of Genesis Energy shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 67.3% of International Seaways shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.7% of Genesis Energy shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 1.7% of International Seaways shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Genesis Energy currently has a consensus target price of $18.00, indicating a potential upside of 19.84%. International Seaways has a consensus target price of $102.25, indicating a potential downside of 6.07%. Given Genesis Energy's higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Genesis Energy is more favorable than International Seaways.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Genesis Energy
0 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
2 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.67
International Seaways
0 Sell rating(s)
2 Hold rating(s)
5 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.71

In the previous week, International Seaways had 12 more articles in the media than Genesis Energy. MarketBeat recorded 12 mentions for International Seaways and 0 mentions for Genesis Energy. International Seaways' average media sentiment score of 0.55 beat Genesis Energy's score of 0.00 indicating that International Seaways is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Genesis Energy Neutral
International Seaways Positive

Genesis Energy has a beta of 0.67, indicating that its stock price is 33% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, International Seaways has a beta of -0.13, indicating that its stock price is 113% less volatile than the broader market.

Summary

International Seaways beats Genesis Energy on 13 of the 19 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Genesis Energy compare to Hafnia?

Hafnia (NYSE:HAFN) and Genesis Energy (NYSE:GEL) are both energy companies, but which is the better business? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their valuation, institutional ownership, media sentiment, risk, dividends, analyst recommendations, profitability and earnings.

Hafnia presently has a consensus target price of $12.00, suggesting a potential upside of 23.58%. Genesis Energy has a consensus target price of $18.00, suggesting a potential upside of 19.84%. Given Hafnia's higher possible upside, research analysts plainly believe Hafnia is more favorable than Genesis Energy.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Hafnia
0 Sell rating(s)
3 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.60
Genesis Energy
0 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
2 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.67

66.8% of Genesis Energy shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.7% of Genesis Energy shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

In the previous week, Hafnia had 13 more articles in the media than Genesis Energy. MarketBeat recorded 13 mentions for Hafnia and 0 mentions for Genesis Energy. Hafnia's average media sentiment score of 0.51 beat Genesis Energy's score of 0.00 indicating that Hafnia is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Hafnia Positive
Genesis Energy Neutral

Hafnia has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Genesis Energy. Hafnia is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Genesis Energy, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Hafnia$955.87M5.21$339.68M$1.327.36
Genesis Energy$1.63B1.13-$440.40M$0.1979.05

Hafnia pays an annual dividend of $2.00 per share and has a dividend yield of 20.6%. Genesis Energy pays an annual dividend of $0.80 per share and has a dividend yield of 5.3%. Hafnia pays out 151.5% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Genesis Energy pays out 421.1% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Genesis Energy has raised its dividend for 1 consecutive years. Hafnia is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

Hafnia has a beta of 0.65, meaning that its share price is 35% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Genesis Energy has a beta of 0.67, meaning that its share price is 33% less volatile than the broader market.

Hafnia has a net margin of 56.72% compared to Genesis Energy's net margin of 4.29%. Genesis Energy's return on equity of 55.96% beat Hafnia's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Hafnia56.72% 26.74% 17.14%
Genesis Energy 4.29%55.96%1.58%

Summary

Hafnia beats Genesis Energy on 11 of the 20 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Genesis Energy News Delivered to You Automatically

Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for GEL and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.

Subscribe Now
SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding GEL and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.
Skip Chart

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of NYSE and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Skip Chart

GEL vs. The Competition

MetricGenesis EnergyOil, Gas & Consumable Fuels IndustryEnergy SectorNYSE Exchange
Market Cap$1.79B$11.53B$10.06B$23.07B
Dividend Yield5.46%10.11%10.59%3.62%
P/E Ratio79.0617.8420.9228.31
Price / Sales1.13614.44502.4420.62
Price / Cash7.2639.7936.0819.33
Price / Book11.834.514.074.73
Net Income-$440.40M$5.28B$4.35B$1.07B
7 Day Performance-2.15%-1.66%-1.53%-0.28%
1 Month Performance-7.17%0.48%-0.03%-3.65%
1 Year Performance-7.74%33.36%34.20%8.18%

Genesis Energy Competitors List

CompanyMarketRankShare PriceAnalysts' Price Target1Y Price PerformanceMarket CapRevenueP/E RatioEmployee CountIndicator(s)
GEL
Genesis Energy
1.8606 of 5 stars
$15.02
+2.5%
$18.00
+19.8%
-9.3%$1.79B$1.63B79.061,061
SOBO
South Bow
2.0334 of 5 stars
$35.74
-0.7%
$33.00
-7.7%
+25.7%$7.51B$2.00B16.17600
PAGP
Plains GP
3.1978 of 5 stars
$28.00
+0.0%
$24.18
-13.6%
+49.5%$5.54B$52.31B52.833,900
GLNG
Golar LNG
3.1007 of 5 stars
$51.47
-2.7%
$63.00
+22.4%
+31.2%$5.21B$523.38M32.171,700
INSW
International Seaways
3.1079 of 5 stars
$105.74
+2.0%
$94.75
-10.4%
+128.6%$5.13B$843.30M6.762,763

Related Companies and Tools


This page (NYSE:GEL) was last updated on 9/22/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.
From Our Partners