Free Trial

Genesis Energy (GEL) Competitors

Genesis Energy logo
$14.39 -0.05 (-0.35%)
Closing price 03:59 PM Eastern
Extended Trading
$14.38 -0.01 (-0.06%)
As of 07:30 PM Eastern
Extended trading is trading that happens on electronic markets outside of regular trading hours. This is a fair market value extended hours price provided by Massive. Learn more.

GEL vs. INSW, HAFN, PAGP, GLNG, and STNG

Should you buy Genesis Energy stock or one of its competitors? Genesis Energy's main competitors and comparable companies include International Seaways (INSW), Hafnia (HAFN), Plains GP (PAGP), Golar LNG (GLNG), and Scorpio Tankers (STNG). Companies are selected based on similarities in market, industry, and size. These companies are all part of the "oil & gas storage & transportation" industry.

How does Genesis Energy compare to International Seaways?

Genesis Energy (NYSE:GEL) and International Seaways (NYSE:INSW) are both energy companies, but which is the better investment? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their profitability, analyst recommendations, earnings, institutional ownership, dividends, valuation, risk and media sentiment.

International Seaways has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Genesis Energy. International Seaways is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Genesis Energy, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Genesis Energy$1.63B1.08-$440.40M$0.1976.04
International Seaways$1.26B4.73$309.26M$15.647.67

Genesis Energy pays an annual dividend of $0.80 per share and has a dividend yield of 5.5%. International Seaways pays an annual dividend of $20.20 per share and has a dividend yield of 16.8%. Genesis Energy pays out 421.1% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. International Seaways pays out 129.2% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Genesis Energy has raised its dividend for 1 consecutive years. International Seaways is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

In the previous week, International Seaways had 7 more articles in the media than Genesis Energy. MarketBeat recorded 9 mentions for International Seaways and 2 mentions for Genesis Energy. Genesis Energy's average media sentiment score of 1.37 beat International Seaways' score of 0.77 indicating that Genesis Energy is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Genesis Energy
1 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
International Seaways
2 Very Positive mention(s)
2 Positive mention(s)
4 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

International Seaways has a net margin of 61.98% compared to Genesis Energy's net margin of 4.29%. Genesis Energy's return on equity of 55.96% beat International Seaways' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Genesis Energy4.29% 55.96% 1.58%
International Seaways 61.98%31.75%23.54%

66.8% of Genesis Energy shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 67.3% of International Seaways shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.7% of Genesis Energy shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 1.7% of International Seaways shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Genesis Energy presently has a consensus target price of $18.00, suggesting a potential upside of 24.58%. International Seaways has a consensus target price of $109.80, suggesting a potential downside of 8.47%. Given Genesis Energy's higher possible upside, equities research analysts plainly believe Genesis Energy is more favorable than International Seaways.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Genesis Energy
0 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
2 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.67
International Seaways
0 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
6 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00

Genesis Energy has a beta of 0.83, meaning that its share price is 17% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, International Seaways has a beta of -0.14, meaning that its share price is 114% less volatile than the broader market.

Summary

International Seaways beats Genesis Energy on 13 of the 20 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Genesis Energy compare to Hafnia?

Hafnia (NYSE:HAFN) and Genesis Energy (NYSE:GEL) are both energy companies, but which is the better stock? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their valuation, earnings, dividends, risk, profitability, media sentiment, analyst recommendations and institutional ownership.

Hafnia pays an annual dividend of $2.00 per share and has a dividend yield of 18.7%. Genesis Energy pays an annual dividend of $0.80 per share and has a dividend yield of 5.5%. Hafnia pays out 151.5% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Genesis Energy pays out 421.1% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Genesis Energy has raised its dividend for 1 consecutive years. Hafnia is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

Hafnia has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Genesis Energy. Hafnia is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Genesis Energy, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Hafnia$955.87M5.74$339.68M$1.328.11
Genesis Energy$1.63B1.08-$440.40M$0.1976.04

Hafnia presently has a consensus price target of $12.00, indicating a potential upside of 12.03%. Genesis Energy has a consensus price target of $18.00, indicating a potential upside of 24.58%. Given Genesis Energy's higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Genesis Energy is more favorable than Hafnia.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Hafnia
0 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
3 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00
Genesis Energy
0 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
2 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.67

In the previous week, Hafnia had 1 more articles in the media than Genesis Energy. MarketBeat recorded 3 mentions for Hafnia and 2 mentions for Genesis Energy. Genesis Energy's average media sentiment score of 1.37 beat Hafnia's score of 0.06 indicating that Genesis Energy is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Hafnia
0 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
2 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral
Genesis Energy
1 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

Hafnia has a beta of 0.52, indicating that its share price is 48% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Genesis Energy has a beta of 0.83, indicating that its share price is 17% less volatile than the broader market.

Hafnia has a net margin of 56.72% compared to Genesis Energy's net margin of 4.29%. Genesis Energy's return on equity of 55.96% beat Hafnia's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Hafnia56.72% 26.74% 17.14%
Genesis Energy 4.29%55.96%1.58%

66.8% of Genesis Energy shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.7% of Genesis Energy shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Summary

Hafnia beats Genesis Energy on 11 of the 20 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Genesis Energy compare to Plains GP?

Plains GP (NYSE:PAGP) and Genesis Energy (NYSE:GEL) are both energy companies, but which is the better business? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their risk, analyst recommendations, institutional ownership, earnings, valuation, dividends, profitability and media sentiment.

In the previous week, Plains GP had 5 more articles in the media than Genesis Energy. MarketBeat recorded 7 mentions for Plains GP and 2 mentions for Genesis Energy. Genesis Energy's average media sentiment score of 1.37 beat Plains GP's score of 0.99 indicating that Genesis Energy is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Plains GP
3 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
2 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
Genesis Energy
1 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

Plains GP has higher revenue and earnings than Genesis Energy. Plains GP is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Genesis Energy, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Plains GP$52.31B0.10$103M$2.799.54
Genesis Energy$1.63B1.08-$440.40M$0.1976.04

Genesis Energy has a net margin of 4.29% compared to Plains GP's net margin of 0.21%. Genesis Energy's return on equity of 55.96% beat Plains GP's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Plains GP0.21% 0.70% 0.36%
Genesis Energy 4.29%55.96%1.58%

Plains GP has a beta of 0.54, indicating that its stock price is 46% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Genesis Energy has a beta of 0.83, indicating that its stock price is 17% less volatile than the broader market.

88.3% of Plains GP shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 66.8% of Genesis Energy shares are held by institutional investors. 6.9% of Plains GP shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.7% of Genesis Energy shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Plains GP pays an annual dividend of $1.67 per share and has a dividend yield of 6.3%. Genesis Energy pays an annual dividend of $0.80 per share and has a dividend yield of 5.5%. Plains GP pays out 59.9% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Genesis Energy pays out 421.1% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Genesis Energy has raised its dividend for 1 consecutive years. Plains GP is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

Plains GP presently has a consensus price target of $25.33, suggesting a potential downside of 4.83%. Genesis Energy has a consensus price target of $18.00, suggesting a potential upside of 24.58%. Given Genesis Energy's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Genesis Energy is more favorable than Plains GP.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Plains GP
2 Sell rating(s)
5 Hold rating(s)
5 Buy rating(s)
2 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.50
Genesis Energy
0 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
2 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.67

Summary

Plains GP and Genesis Energy tied by winning 10 of the 20 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Genesis Energy compare to Golar LNG?

Golar LNG (NASDAQ:GLNG) and Genesis Energy (NYSE:GEL) are both energy companies, but which is the superior business? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their dividends, valuation, risk, analyst recommendations, institutional ownership, earnings, profitability and media sentiment.

92.2% of Golar LNG shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 66.8% of Genesis Energy shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.0% of Golar LNG shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 0.7% of Genesis Energy shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

In the previous week, Golar LNG had 8 more articles in the media than Genesis Energy. MarketBeat recorded 10 mentions for Golar LNG and 2 mentions for Genesis Energy. Genesis Energy's average media sentiment score of 1.37 beat Golar LNG's score of 0.27 indicating that Genesis Energy is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Golar LNG
1 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
4 Neutral mention(s)
3 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral
Genesis Energy
1 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

Golar LNG currently has a consensus price target of $68.67, suggesting a potential upside of 43.29%. Genesis Energy has a consensus price target of $18.00, suggesting a potential upside of 24.58%. Given Golar LNG's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, research analysts clearly believe Golar LNG is more favorable than Genesis Energy.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Golar LNG
0 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
4 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00
Genesis Energy
0 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
2 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.67

Golar LNG has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Genesis Energy. Golar LNG is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Genesis Energy, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Golar LNG$393.52M12.34$65.68M$1.6029.95
Genesis Energy$1.63B1.08-$440.40M$0.1976.04

Golar LNG pays an annual dividend of $1.00 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.1%. Genesis Energy pays an annual dividend of $0.80 per share and has a dividend yield of 5.5%. Golar LNG pays out 62.5% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Genesis Energy pays out 421.1% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Golar LNG has raised its dividend for 2 consecutive years and Genesis Energy has raised its dividend for 1 consecutive years.

Golar LNG has a beta of 0.13, indicating that its stock price is 87% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Genesis Energy has a beta of 0.83, indicating that its stock price is 17% less volatile than the broader market.

Golar LNG has a net margin of 31.27% compared to Genesis Energy's net margin of 4.29%. Genesis Energy's return on equity of 55.96% beat Golar LNG's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Golar LNG31.27% 8.91% 3.75%
Genesis Energy 4.29%55.96%1.58%

Summary

Golar LNG beats Genesis Energy on 13 of the 20 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Genesis Energy compare to Scorpio Tankers?

Genesis Energy (NYSE:GEL) and Scorpio Tankers (NYSE:STNG) are both energy companies, but which is the better business? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their earnings, risk, dividends, institutional ownership, profitability, valuation, analyst recommendations and media sentiment.

Genesis Energy has a beta of 0.83, meaning that its stock price is 17% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Scorpio Tankers has a beta of -0.17, meaning that its stock price is 117% less volatile than the broader market.

Scorpio Tankers has a net margin of 67.16% compared to Genesis Energy's net margin of 4.29%. Genesis Energy's return on equity of 55.96% beat Scorpio Tankers' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Genesis Energy4.29% 55.96% 1.58%
Scorpio Tankers 67.16%16.43%13.14%

66.8% of Genesis Energy shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 54.6% of Scorpio Tankers shares are held by institutional investors. 0.7% of Genesis Energy shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 7.3% of Scorpio Tankers shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Genesis Energy currently has a consensus price target of $18.00, suggesting a potential upside of 24.58%. Scorpio Tankers has a consensus price target of $91.57, suggesting a potential upside of 7.72%. Given Genesis Energy's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, equities research analysts plainly believe Genesis Energy is more favorable than Scorpio Tankers.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Genesis Energy
0 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
2 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.67
Scorpio Tankers
1 Sell rating(s)
5 Hold rating(s)
5 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.36

In the previous week, Scorpio Tankers had 1 more articles in the media than Genesis Energy. MarketBeat recorded 3 mentions for Scorpio Tankers and 2 mentions for Genesis Energy. Genesis Energy's average media sentiment score of 1.37 beat Scorpio Tankers' score of 0.34 indicating that Genesis Energy is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Genesis Energy
1 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
Scorpio Tankers
1 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral

Scorpio Tankers has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Genesis Energy. Scorpio Tankers is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Genesis Energy, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Genesis Energy$1.63B1.08-$440.40M$0.1976.04
Scorpio Tankers$1.22B3.53$344.29M$16.015.31

Genesis Energy pays an annual dividend of $0.80 per share and has a dividend yield of 5.5%. Scorpio Tankers pays an annual dividend of $1.80 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.1%. Genesis Energy pays out 421.1% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Scorpio Tankers pays out 11.2% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Genesis Energy has raised its dividend for 1 consecutive years and Scorpio Tankers has raised its dividend for 2 consecutive years.

Summary

Scorpio Tankers beats Genesis Energy on 10 of the 19 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Genesis Energy News Delivered to You Automatically

Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for GEL and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.

Subscribe Now
SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding GEL and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.
Skip Chart

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of NYSE and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Skip Chart

GEL vs. The Competition

MetricGenesis EnergyOil, Gas & Consumable Fuels IndustryEnergy SectorNYSE Exchange
Market Cap$1.76B$11.74B$10.23B$23.07B
Dividend Yield5.58%10.18%10.66%3.72%
P/E Ratio75.7417.1420.4228.54
Price / Sales0.96643.36524.8195.75
Price / Cash7.1540.9937.0919.30
Price / Book11.334.544.104.71
Net Income-$440.40M$5.27B$4.34B$1.07B
7 Day Performance2.63%0.49%0.31%-0.18%
1 Month Performance-7.85%-1.56%-1.99%-3.59%
1 Year Performance-3.30%32.96%34.19%9.32%

Genesis Energy Competitors List

CompanyMarketRankShare PriceAnalysts' Price Target1Y Price PerformanceMarket CapRevenueP/E RatioEmployee CountIndicator(s)
GEL
Genesis Energy
3.0758 of 5 stars
$14.39
-0.4%
$18.00
+25.1%
-2.9%$1.76B$1.83B75.741,061
INSW
International Seaways
3.4838 of 5 stars
$116.60
+0.7%
$109.80
-5.8%
+175.4%$5.74B$1.26B7.462,763
HAFN
Hafnia
3.4589 of 5 stars
$10.28
+0.2%
$12.00
+16.8%
+86.4%$5.25B$2.67B7.784,876
PAGP
Plains GP
3.0066 of 5 stars
$26.18
+0.5%
$24.91
-4.9%
+58.0%$5.18B$52.31B49.403,900
GLNG
Golar LNG
2.962 of 5 stars
$49.74
+1.1%
$64.25
+29.2%
+22.9%$4.99B$393.52M31.09500

Related Companies and Tools


This page (NYSE:GEL) was last updated on 10/12/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.
From Our Partners