Go Pro

ZIM Integrated Shipping Services (ZIM) Competitors

ZIM Integrated Shipping Services logo
$25.55 +0.32 (+1.26%)
Closing price 07/2/2026 03:59 PM Eastern
Extended Trading
$25.52 -0.03 (-0.11%)
As of 07/2/2026 07:57 PM Eastern
Extended trading is trading that happens on electronic markets outside of regular trading hours. This is a fair market value extended hours price provided by Massive. Learn more.

ZIM vs. AAL, TFII, NCLH, ASR, and SOBO

Should you buy ZIM Integrated Shipping Services stock or one of its competitors? MarketBeat compares ZIM Integrated Shipping Services with other companies and stocks that may be similar based on industry, sector, market capitalization, business model, investor interest, or shared news coverage. Companies and stocks commonly compared with ZIM Integrated Shipping Services include American Airlines Group (AAL), TFI International (TFII), Norwegian Cruise Line (NCLH), Grupo Aeroportuario del Sureste (ASR), and South Bow (SOBO). These companies are all part of the "transportation" industry.

How does ZIM Integrated Shipping Services compare to American Airlines Group?

American Airlines Group (NASDAQ:AAL) and ZIM Integrated Shipping Services (NYSE:ZIM) are both transportation companies, but which is the better business? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their profitability, earnings, risk, dividends, analyst recommendations, media sentiment, institutional ownership and valuation.

American Airlines Group presently has a consensus target price of $18.89, indicating a potential upside of 5.41%. ZIM Integrated Shipping Services has a consensus target price of $19.33, indicating a potential downside of 24.33%. Given American Airlines Group's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, equities research analysts clearly believe American Airlines Group is more favorable than ZIM Integrated Shipping Services.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
American Airlines Group
2 Sell rating(s)
9 Hold rating(s)
8 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.32
ZIM Integrated Shipping Services
2 Sell rating(s)
4 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.00

American Airlines Group has a beta of 1.31, indicating that its stock price is 31% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, ZIM Integrated Shipping Services has a beta of 1.19, indicating that its stock price is 19% more volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, American Airlines Group had 38 more articles in the media than ZIM Integrated Shipping Services. MarketBeat recorded 41 mentions for American Airlines Group and 3 mentions for ZIM Integrated Shipping Services. ZIM Integrated Shipping Services' average media sentiment score of 0.92 beat American Airlines Group's score of 0.72 indicating that ZIM Integrated Shipping Services is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
American Airlines Group
16 Very Positive mention(s)
5 Positive mention(s)
13 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
ZIM Integrated Shipping Services
1 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

American Airlines Group pays an annual dividend of $0.40 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.2%. ZIM Integrated Shipping Services pays an annual dividend of $0.06 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.2%. American Airlines Group pays out 129.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. ZIM Integrated Shipping Services pays out 7.4% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. ZIM Integrated Shipping Services has raised its dividend for 1 consecutive years.

ZIM Integrated Shipping Services has lower revenue, but higher earnings than American Airlines Group. ZIM Integrated Shipping Services is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than American Airlines Group, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
American Airlines Group$55.99B0.21$111M$0.3157.81
ZIM Integrated Shipping Services$6.90B0.45$479.20M$0.8131.54

52.4% of American Airlines Group shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 21.4% of ZIM Integrated Shipping Services shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.7% of American Airlines Group shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 1.3% of ZIM Integrated Shipping Services shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

ZIM Integrated Shipping Services has a net margin of 1.56% compared to American Airlines Group's net margin of 0.36%. ZIM Integrated Shipping Services' return on equity of -0.26% beat American Airlines Group's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
American Airlines Group0.36% -9.11% 0.57%
ZIM Integrated Shipping Services 1.56%-0.26%-0.09%

Summary

American Airlines Group and ZIM Integrated Shipping Services tied by winning 10 of the 20 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does ZIM Integrated Shipping Services compare to TFI International?

TFI International (NYSE:TFII) and ZIM Integrated Shipping Services (NYSE:ZIM) are both transportation companies, but which is the better business? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their risk, institutional ownership, valuation, media sentiment, dividends, analyst recommendations, profitability and earnings.

TFI International pays an annual dividend of $1.88 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.3%. ZIM Integrated Shipping Services pays an annual dividend of $0.06 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.2%. TFI International pays out 52.4% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. ZIM Integrated Shipping Services pays out 7.4% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. ZIM Integrated Shipping Services has raised its dividend for 1 consecutive years.

In the previous week, ZIM Integrated Shipping Services had 1 more articles in the media than TFI International. MarketBeat recorded 3 mentions for ZIM Integrated Shipping Services and 2 mentions for TFI International. ZIM Integrated Shipping Services' average media sentiment score of 0.92 beat TFI International's score of 0.84 indicating that ZIM Integrated Shipping Services is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
TFI International
0 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
2 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
ZIM Integrated Shipping Services
1 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

TFI International has a beta of 1.64, suggesting that its stock price is 64% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, ZIM Integrated Shipping Services has a beta of 1.19, suggesting that its stock price is 19% more volatile than the broader market.

73.3% of TFI International shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 21.4% of ZIM Integrated Shipping Services shares are held by institutional investors. 5.5% of TFI International shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 1.3% of ZIM Integrated Shipping Services shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

TFI International currently has a consensus target price of $154.57, suggesting a potential upside of 10.98%. ZIM Integrated Shipping Services has a consensus target price of $19.33, suggesting a potential downside of 24.33%. Given TFI International's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe TFI International is more favorable than ZIM Integrated Shipping Services.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
TFI International
0 Sell rating(s)
7 Hold rating(s)
9 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.65
ZIM Integrated Shipping Services
2 Sell rating(s)
4 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.00

TFI International has a net margin of 3.79% compared to ZIM Integrated Shipping Services' net margin of 1.56%. TFI International's return on equity of 13.43% beat ZIM Integrated Shipping Services' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
TFI International3.79% 13.43% 4.88%
ZIM Integrated Shipping Services 1.56%-0.26%-0.09%

ZIM Integrated Shipping Services has lower revenue, but higher earnings than TFI International. ZIM Integrated Shipping Services is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than TFI International, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
TFI International$7.88B1.45$310.55M$3.5938.80
ZIM Integrated Shipping Services$6.90B0.45$479.20M$0.8131.54

Summary

TFI International beats ZIM Integrated Shipping Services on 14 of the 19 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does ZIM Integrated Shipping Services compare to Norwegian Cruise Line?

Norwegian Cruise Line (NYSE:NCLH) and ZIM Integrated Shipping Services (NYSE:ZIM) are both mid-cap transportation companies, but which is the better business? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their media sentiment, risk, profitability, earnings, dividends, analyst recommendations, valuation and institutional ownership.

Norwegian Cruise Line currently has a consensus price target of $21.58, indicating a potential upside of 9.10%. ZIM Integrated Shipping Services has a consensus price target of $19.33, indicating a potential downside of 24.33%. Given Norwegian Cruise Line's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, equities research analysts clearly believe Norwegian Cruise Line is more favorable than ZIM Integrated Shipping Services.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Norwegian Cruise Line
1 Sell rating(s)
11 Hold rating(s)
8 Buy rating(s)
2 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.50
ZIM Integrated Shipping Services
2 Sell rating(s)
4 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.00

In the previous week, Norwegian Cruise Line had 12 more articles in the media than ZIM Integrated Shipping Services. MarketBeat recorded 15 mentions for Norwegian Cruise Line and 3 mentions for ZIM Integrated Shipping Services. ZIM Integrated Shipping Services' average media sentiment score of 0.92 beat Norwegian Cruise Line's score of 0.67 indicating that ZIM Integrated Shipping Services is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Norwegian Cruise Line
8 Very Positive mention(s)
2 Positive mention(s)
5 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
ZIM Integrated Shipping Services
1 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

Norwegian Cruise Line has a net margin of 5.66% compared to ZIM Integrated Shipping Services' net margin of 1.56%. Norwegian Cruise Line's return on equity of 47.84% beat ZIM Integrated Shipping Services' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Norwegian Cruise Line5.66% 47.84% 4.46%
ZIM Integrated Shipping Services 1.56%-0.26%-0.09%

69.6% of Norwegian Cruise Line shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 21.4% of ZIM Integrated Shipping Services shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.3% of Norwegian Cruise Line shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 1.3% of ZIM Integrated Shipping Services shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

ZIM Integrated Shipping Services has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Norwegian Cruise Line. Norwegian Cruise Line is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than ZIM Integrated Shipping Services, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Norwegian Cruise Line$10.03B0.91$423.25M$1.1916.62
ZIM Integrated Shipping Services$6.90B0.45$479.20M$0.8131.54

Norwegian Cruise Line has a beta of 1.87, suggesting that its stock price is 87% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, ZIM Integrated Shipping Services has a beta of 1.19, suggesting that its stock price is 19% more volatile than the broader market.

Summary

Norwegian Cruise Line beats ZIM Integrated Shipping Services on 13 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does ZIM Integrated Shipping Services compare to Grupo Aeroportuario del Sureste?

ZIM Integrated Shipping Services (NYSE:ZIM) and Grupo Aeroportuario del Sureste (NYSE:ASR) are both mid-cap transportation companies, but which is the better business? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their risk, analyst recommendations, valuation, media sentiment, institutional ownership, earnings, profitability and dividends.

In the previous week, ZIM Integrated Shipping Services had 3 more articles in the media than Grupo Aeroportuario del Sureste. MarketBeat recorded 3 mentions for ZIM Integrated Shipping Services and 0 mentions for Grupo Aeroportuario del Sureste. ZIM Integrated Shipping Services' average media sentiment score of 0.92 beat Grupo Aeroportuario del Sureste's score of 0.00 indicating that ZIM Integrated Shipping Services is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Overall Sentiment
ZIM Integrated Shipping Services Positive
Grupo Aeroportuario del Sureste Neutral

ZIM Integrated Shipping Services pays an annual dividend of $0.06 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.2%. Grupo Aeroportuario del Sureste pays an annual dividend of $19.85 per share and has a dividend yield of 6.4%. ZIM Integrated Shipping Services pays out 7.4% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Grupo Aeroportuario del Sureste pays out 110.2% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. ZIM Integrated Shipping Services has increased its dividend for 1 consecutive years.

Grupo Aeroportuario del Sureste has lower revenue, but higher earnings than ZIM Integrated Shipping Services. Grupo Aeroportuario del Sureste is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than ZIM Integrated Shipping Services, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
ZIM Integrated Shipping Services$6.90B0.45$479.20M$0.8131.54
Grupo Aeroportuario del Sureste$1.94B4.81$547.52M$18.0117.30

ZIM Integrated Shipping Services has a beta of 1.19, indicating that its share price is 19% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Grupo Aeroportuario del Sureste has a beta of 0.46, indicating that its share price is 54% less volatile than the broader market.

Grupo Aeroportuario del Sureste has a net margin of 26.32% compared to ZIM Integrated Shipping Services' net margin of 1.56%. Grupo Aeroportuario del Sureste's return on equity of 21.77% beat ZIM Integrated Shipping Services' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
ZIM Integrated Shipping Services1.56% -0.26% -0.09%
Grupo Aeroportuario del Sureste 26.32%21.77%11.71%

ZIM Integrated Shipping Services presently has a consensus price target of $19.33, suggesting a potential downside of 24.33%. Grupo Aeroportuario del Sureste has a consensus price target of $300.00, suggesting a potential downside of 3.71%. Given Grupo Aeroportuario del Sureste's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Grupo Aeroportuario del Sureste is more favorable than ZIM Integrated Shipping Services.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
ZIM Integrated Shipping Services
2 Sell rating(s)
4 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.00
Grupo Aeroportuario del Sureste
1 Sell rating(s)
3 Hold rating(s)
3 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.50

21.4% of ZIM Integrated Shipping Services shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 10.6% of Grupo Aeroportuario del Sureste shares are held by institutional investors. 1.3% of ZIM Integrated Shipping Services shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Summary

Grupo Aeroportuario del Sureste beats ZIM Integrated Shipping Services on 10 of the 19 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does ZIM Integrated Shipping Services compare to South Bow?

South Bow (NYSE:SOBO) and ZIM Integrated Shipping Services (NYSE:ZIM) are both mid-cap transportation companies, but which is the better stock? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their institutional ownership, valuation, media sentiment, analyst recommendations, profitability, risk, dividends and earnings.

South Bow presently has a consensus price target of $31.57, indicating a potential downside of 8.09%. ZIM Integrated Shipping Services has a consensus price target of $19.33, indicating a potential downside of 24.33%. Given South Bow's higher probable upside, research analysts clearly believe South Bow is more favorable than ZIM Integrated Shipping Services.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
South Bow
4 Sell rating(s)
8 Hold rating(s)
4 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.00
ZIM Integrated Shipping Services
2 Sell rating(s)
4 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.00

21.4% of ZIM Integrated Shipping Services shares are owned by institutional investors. 1.3% of ZIM Integrated Shipping Services shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

In the previous week, ZIM Integrated Shipping Services had 1 more articles in the media than South Bow. MarketBeat recorded 3 mentions for ZIM Integrated Shipping Services and 2 mentions for South Bow. ZIM Integrated Shipping Services' average media sentiment score of 0.92 beat South Bow's score of 0.00 indicating that ZIM Integrated Shipping Services is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
South Bow
0 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
2 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral
ZIM Integrated Shipping Services
1 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

ZIM Integrated Shipping Services has higher revenue and earnings than South Bow. South Bow is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than ZIM Integrated Shipping Services, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
South Bow$1.99B3.61$433M$2.0316.92
ZIM Integrated Shipping Services$6.90B0.45$479.20M$0.8131.54

South Bow pays an annual dividend of $2.00 per share and has a dividend yield of 5.8%. ZIM Integrated Shipping Services pays an annual dividend of $0.06 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.2%. South Bow pays out 98.5% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. ZIM Integrated Shipping Services pays out 7.4% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. ZIM Integrated Shipping Services has raised its dividend for 1 consecutive years.

South Bow has a beta of 0.16, meaning that its stock price is 84% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, ZIM Integrated Shipping Services has a beta of 1.19, meaning that its stock price is 19% more volatile than the broader market.

South Bow has a net margin of 21.32% compared to ZIM Integrated Shipping Services' net margin of 1.56%. South Bow's return on equity of 15.24% beat ZIM Integrated Shipping Services' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
South Bow21.32% 15.24% 3.57%
ZIM Integrated Shipping Services 1.56%-0.26%-0.09%

Summary

ZIM Integrated Shipping Services beats South Bow on 11 of the 19 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get ZIM Integrated Shipping Services News Delivered to You Automatically

Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for ZIM and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.

Subscribe Now
SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding ZIM and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.
Skip Chart

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of NYSE and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Skip Chart

ZIM vs. The Competition

MetricZIM Integrated Shipping ServicesTRANS IndustryTransportation SectorNYSE Exchange
Market Cap$3.04B$2.97B$8.63B$23.32B
Dividend Yield0.24%6.34%983.35%4.00%
P/E Ratio31.5414.2424.8731.53
Price / Sales0.454.215.54119.84
Price / Cash1.835.978.2625.23
Price / Book0.761.152.264.81
Net Income$479.20M$291.36M$531.96M$1.07B
7 Day Performance-0.16%0.17%-0.06%0.56%
1 Month Performance4.35%-5.69%-1.27%3.95%
1 Year Performance61.95%33.67%24.93%18.30%

ZIM Integrated Shipping Services Competitors List

CompanyMarketRankShare PriceAnalysts' Price Target1Y Price PerformanceMarket CapRevenueP/E RatioEmployee CountIndicator(s)
ZIM
ZIM Integrated Shipping Services
2.1577 of 5 stars
$25.55
+1.3%
$19.33
-24.3%
+58.4%$3.04B$6.90B31.544,714
AAL
American Airlines Group
3.5757 of 5 stars
$18.27
+1.1%
$17.28
-5.4%
+54.1%$12.08B$54.63B58.91139,100
TFII
TFI International
4.4634 of 5 stars
$143.91
+0.2%
$154.57
+7.4%
+47.9%$11.82B$7.88B40.0824,900
NCLH
Norwegian Cruise Line
4.1347 of 5 stars
$20.84
-1.3%
$21.58
+3.6%
-7.4%$9.57B$9.83B17.5244,500
ASR
Grupo Aeroportuario del Sureste
2.9298 of 5 stars
$307.87
+0.4%
$300.00
-2.6%
-3.1%$9.25B$1.94B17.122,023

Related Companies and Tools


This page (NYSE:ZIM) was last updated on 7/3/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.
From Our Partners