Does the media favor ZIM or KEX?

In the previous week, ZIM Integrated Shipping Services had 4 more articles in the media than Kirby. MarketBeat recorded 6 mentions for ZIM Integrated Shipping Services and 2 mentions for Kirby. Kirby's average media sentiment score of 0.99 beat ZIM Integrated Shipping Services' score of 0.60 indicating that Kirby is being referred to more favorably in the news media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment ZIM Integrated Shipping Services 1 Very Positive mention(s) 3 Positive mention(s) 2 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive Kirby 1 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 1 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive

Does the media prefer MATX or ZIM?

In the previous week, ZIM Integrated Shipping Services had 1 more articles in the media than Matson. MarketBeat recorded 6 mentions for ZIM Integrated Shipping Services and 5 mentions for Matson. ZIM Integrated Shipping Services' average media sentiment score of 0.60 beat Matson's score of 0.44 indicating that ZIM Integrated Shipping Services is being referred to more favorably in the news media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment Matson 2 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 2 Neutral mention(s) 1 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Neutral ZIM Integrated Shipping Services 1 Very Positive mention(s) 3 Positive mention(s) 2 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive

Do analysts prefer ZIM or CMBT?

ZIM Integrated Shipping Services currently has a consensus target price of $21.50, suggesting a potential downside of 27.30%. Given ZIM Integrated Shipping Services' higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe ZIM Integrated Shipping Services is more favorable than CMB.TECH. Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score ZIM Integrated Shipping Services 1 Sell rating(s) 6 Hold rating(s) 0 Buy rating(s) 1 Strong Buy rating(s) 2.13 CMB.TECH 0 Sell rating(s) 1 Hold rating(s) 0 Buy rating(s) 2 Strong Buy rating(s) 3.33

Does the media favor ZIM or CMBT?

In the previous week, ZIM Integrated Shipping Services had 4 more articles in the media than CMB.TECH. MarketBeat recorded 6 mentions for ZIM Integrated Shipping Services and 2 mentions for CMB.TECH. CMB.TECH's average media sentiment score of 1.06 beat ZIM Integrated Shipping Services' score of 0.60 indicating that CMB.TECH is being referred to more favorably in the news media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment ZIM Integrated Shipping Services 1 Very Positive mention(s) 3 Positive mention(s) 2 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive CMB.TECH 2 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 0 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive

Does the media refer more to SBLK or ZIM?

In the previous week, Star Bulk Carriers had 11 more articles in the media than ZIM Integrated Shipping Services. MarketBeat recorded 17 mentions for Star Bulk Carriers and 6 mentions for ZIM Integrated Shipping Services. Star Bulk Carriers' average media sentiment score of 1.10 beat ZIM Integrated Shipping Services' score of 0.60 indicating that Star Bulk Carriers is being referred to more favorably in the media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment Star Bulk Carriers 6 Very Positive mention(s) 8 Positive mention(s) 1 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive ZIM Integrated Shipping Services 1 Very Positive mention(s) 3 Positive mention(s) 2 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive

Do analysts prefer ZIM or DAC?

ZIM Integrated Shipping Services currently has a consensus target price of $21.50, suggesting a potential downside of 27.30%. Given ZIM Integrated Shipping Services' higher probable upside, research analysts clearly believe ZIM Integrated Shipping Services is more favorable than Danaos. Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score ZIM Integrated Shipping Services 1 Sell rating(s) 6 Hold rating(s) 0 Buy rating(s) 1 Strong Buy rating(s) 2.13 Danaos 0 Sell rating(s) 0 Hold rating(s) 0 Buy rating(s) 3 Strong Buy rating(s) 4.00

Does the media favor ZIM or DAC?

In the previous week, ZIM Integrated Shipping Services had 2 more articles in the media than Danaos. MarketBeat recorded 6 mentions for ZIM Integrated Shipping Services and 4 mentions for Danaos. ZIM Integrated Shipping Services' average media sentiment score of 0.60 beat Danaos' score of 0.57 indicating that ZIM Integrated Shipping Services is being referred to more favorably in the media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment ZIM Integrated Shipping Services 1 Very Positive mention(s) 3 Positive mention(s) 2 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive Danaos 1 Very Positive mention(s) 2 Positive mention(s) 1 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive

ZIM Integrated Shipping Services (ZIM) Competitors

$29.58 -0.52 (-1.71%)

As of 02:35 PM Eastern

Compare

ZIM vs. KEX, MATX, CMBT, SBLK, and DAC

Should you buy ZIM Integrated Shipping Services stock or one of its competitors? ZIM Integrated Shipping Services's main competitors and comparable companies include Kirby (KEX), Matson (MATX), CMB.TECH (CMBT), Star Bulk Carriers (SBLK), and Danaos (DAC). Companies are selected based on similarities in market, industry, and size. These companies are all part of the "marine transportation" industry.

How does ZIM Integrated Shipping Services compare to Kirby?

ZIM Integrated Shipping Services (NYSE:ZIM) and Kirby (NYSE:KEX) are both mid-cap industrials companies, but which is the superior business? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their valuation, profitability, institutional ownership, media sentiment, earnings, dividends, risk and analyst recommendations.

21.4% of ZIM Integrated Shipping Services shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 96.2% of Kirby shares are held by institutional investors. 1.3% of ZIM Integrated Shipping Services shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 0.8% of Kirby shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

ZIM Integrated Shipping Services has higher revenue and earnings than Kirby. Kirby is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than ZIM Integrated Shipping Services, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
ZIM Integrated Shipping Services	$6.44B	0.55	$479.20M	$1.15	25.72
Kirby	$3.49B	1.96	$354.57M	$6.50	19.97

In the previous week, ZIM Integrated Shipping Services had 4 more articles in the media than Kirby. MarketBeat recorded 6 mentions for ZIM Integrated Shipping Services and 2 mentions for Kirby. Kirby's average media sentiment score of 0.99 beat ZIM Integrated Shipping Services' score of 0.60 indicating that Kirby is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
ZIM Integrated Shipping Services	1 Very Positive mention(s)	3 Positive mention(s)	2 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive
Kirby	1 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	1 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive

ZIM Integrated Shipping Services has a beta of 1.18, indicating that its stock price is 18% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Kirby has a beta of 0.86, indicating that its stock price is 14% less volatile than the broader market.

ZIM Integrated Shipping Services currently has a consensus price target of $21.50, suggesting a potential downside of 27.30%. Kirby has a consensus price target of $163.20, suggesting a potential upside of 25.71%. Given Kirby's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Kirby is more favorable than ZIM Integrated Shipping Services.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
ZIM Integrated Shipping Services	1 Sell rating(s)	6 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	1 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.13
Kirby	0 Sell rating(s)	1 Hold rating(s)	6 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.86

Kirby has a net margin of 10.18% compared to ZIM Integrated Shipping Services' net margin of 2.15%. Kirby's return on equity of 10.44% beat ZIM Integrated Shipping Services' return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
ZIM Integrated Shipping Services	2.15%	1.11%	0.41%
Kirby	10.18%	10.44%	5.82%

Summary

Kirby beats ZIM Integrated Shipping Services on 10 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does ZIM Integrated Shipping Services compare to Matson?

Matson (NYSE:MATX) and ZIM Integrated Shipping Services (NYSE:ZIM) are both mid-cap industrials companies, but which is the better investment? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their dividends, media sentiment, earnings, institutional ownership, analyst recommendations, risk, valuation and profitability.

In the previous week, ZIM Integrated Shipping Services had 1 more articles in the media than Matson. MarketBeat recorded 6 mentions for ZIM Integrated Shipping Services and 5 mentions for Matson. ZIM Integrated Shipping Services' average media sentiment score of 0.60 beat Matson's score of 0.44 indicating that ZIM Integrated Shipping Services is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Matson	2 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	2 Neutral mention(s)	1 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Neutral
ZIM Integrated Shipping Services	1 Very Positive mention(s)	3 Positive mention(s)	2 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive

ZIM Integrated Shipping Services has higher revenue and earnings than Matson. Matson is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than ZIM Integrated Shipping Services, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Matson	$3.34B	2.02	$444.80M	$14.96	15.07
ZIM Integrated Shipping Services	$6.44B	0.55	$479.20M	$1.15	25.72

Matson currently has a consensus price target of $232.33, indicating a potential upside of 3.02%. ZIM Integrated Shipping Services has a consensus price target of $21.50, indicating a potential downside of 27.30%. Given Matson's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, research analysts plainly believe Matson is more favorable than ZIM Integrated Shipping Services.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Matson	0 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	4 Buy rating(s)	1 Strong Buy rating(s)	3.20
ZIM Integrated Shipping Services	1 Sell rating(s)	6 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	1 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.13

Matson has a beta of 1.26, meaning that its share price is 26% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, ZIM Integrated Shipping Services has a beta of 1.18, meaning that its share price is 18% more volatile than the broader market.

84.8% of Matson shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 21.4% of ZIM Integrated Shipping Services shares are held by institutional investors. 2.5% of Matson shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 1.3% of ZIM Integrated Shipping Services shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Matson pays an annual dividend of $1.52 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.7%. ZIM Integrated Shipping Services pays an annual dividend of $0.06 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.2%. Matson pays out 10.2% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. ZIM Integrated Shipping Services pays out 5.2% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Matson has increased its dividend for 13 consecutive years and ZIM Integrated Shipping Services has increased its dividend for 1 consecutive years. Matson is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

Matson has a net margin of 13.41% compared to ZIM Integrated Shipping Services' net margin of 2.15%. Matson's return on equity of 16.94% beat ZIM Integrated Shipping Services' return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Matson	13.41%	16.94%	10.01%
ZIM Integrated Shipping Services	2.15%	1.11%	0.41%

Summary

Matson beats ZIM Integrated Shipping Services on 13 of the 19 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does ZIM Integrated Shipping Services compare to CMB.TECH?

ZIM Integrated Shipping Services (NYSE:ZIM) and CMB.TECH (NYSE:CMBT) are both mid-cap industrials companies, but which is the better investment? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their earnings, media sentiment, profitability, valuation, institutional ownership, dividends, risk and analyst recommendations.

CMB.TECH has a net margin of 37.19% compared to ZIM Integrated Shipping Services' net margin of 2.15%. CMB.TECH's return on equity of 30.02% beat ZIM Integrated Shipping Services' return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
ZIM Integrated Shipping Services	2.15%	1.11%	0.41%
CMB.TECH	37.19%	30.02%	9.90%

ZIM Integrated Shipping Services pays an annual dividend of $0.06 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.2%. CMB.TECH pays an annual dividend of $0.62 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.2%. ZIM Integrated Shipping Services pays out 5.2% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. CMB.TECH pays out 21.3% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. ZIM Integrated Shipping Services has increased its dividend for 1 consecutive years.

21.4% of ZIM Integrated Shipping Services shares are held by institutional investors. 1.3% of ZIM Integrated Shipping Services shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

ZIM Integrated Shipping Services currently has a consensus target price of $21.50, suggesting a potential downside of 27.30%. Given ZIM Integrated Shipping Services' higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe ZIM Integrated Shipping Services is more favorable than CMB.TECH.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
ZIM Integrated Shipping Services	1 Sell rating(s)	6 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	1 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.13
CMB.TECH	0 Sell rating(s)	1 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	2 Strong Buy rating(s)	3.33

In the previous week, ZIM Integrated Shipping Services had 4 more articles in the media than CMB.TECH. MarketBeat recorded 6 mentions for ZIM Integrated Shipping Services and 2 mentions for CMB.TECH. CMB.TECH's average media sentiment score of 1.06 beat ZIM Integrated Shipping Services' score of 0.60 indicating that CMB.TECH is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
ZIM Integrated Shipping Services	1 Very Positive mention(s)	3 Positive mention(s)	2 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive
CMB.TECH	2 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	0 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive

ZIM Integrated Shipping Services has higher revenue and earnings than CMB.TECH. CMB.TECH is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than ZIM Integrated Shipping Services, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
ZIM Integrated Shipping Services	$6.44B	0.55	$479.20M	$1.15	25.72
CMB.TECH	$1.67B	2.29	$160.70M	$2.91	6.58

ZIM Integrated Shipping Services has a beta of 1.18, suggesting that its stock price is 18% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, CMB.TECH has a beta of 0.14, suggesting that its stock price is 86% less volatile than the broader market.

Summary

ZIM Integrated Shipping Services beats CMB.TECH on 10 of the 19 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does ZIM Integrated Shipping Services compare to Star Bulk Carriers?

Star Bulk Carriers (NASDAQ:SBLK) and ZIM Integrated Shipping Services (NYSE:ZIM) are both mid-cap industrials companies, but which is the better investment? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their profitability, risk, earnings, valuation, analyst recommendations, media sentiment, dividends and institutional ownership.

In the previous week, Star Bulk Carriers had 11 more articles in the media than ZIM Integrated Shipping Services. MarketBeat recorded 17 mentions for Star Bulk Carriers and 6 mentions for ZIM Integrated Shipping Services. Star Bulk Carriers' average media sentiment score of 1.10 beat ZIM Integrated Shipping Services' score of 0.60 indicating that Star Bulk Carriers is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Star Bulk Carriers	6 Very Positive mention(s)	8 Positive mention(s)	1 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive
ZIM Integrated Shipping Services	1 Very Positive mention(s)	3 Positive mention(s)	2 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive

33.9% of Star Bulk Carriers shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 21.4% of ZIM Integrated Shipping Services shares are held by institutional investors. 0.9% of Star Bulk Carriers shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 1.3% of ZIM Integrated Shipping Services shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Star Bulk Carriers has a net margin of 23.87% compared to ZIM Integrated Shipping Services' net margin of 2.15%. Star Bulk Carriers' return on equity of 11.72% beat ZIM Integrated Shipping Services' return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Star Bulk Carriers	23.87%	11.72%	7.61%
ZIM Integrated Shipping Services	2.15%	1.11%	0.41%

Star Bulk Carriers presently has a consensus target price of $31.50, indicating a potential upside of 4.73%. ZIM Integrated Shipping Services has a consensus target price of $21.50, indicating a potential downside of 27.30%. Given Star Bulk Carriers' stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, equities analysts clearly believe Star Bulk Carriers is more favorable than ZIM Integrated Shipping Services.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Star Bulk Carriers	0 Sell rating(s)	1 Hold rating(s)	3 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.75
ZIM Integrated Shipping Services	1 Sell rating(s)	6 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	1 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.13

ZIM Integrated Shipping Services has higher revenue and earnings than Star Bulk Carriers. Star Bulk Carriers is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than ZIM Integrated Shipping Services, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Star Bulk Carriers	$1.04B	3.27	$84.17M	$2.55	11.79
ZIM Integrated Shipping Services	$6.44B	0.55	$479.20M	$1.15	25.72

Star Bulk Carriers has a beta of 0.7, meaning that its stock price is 30% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, ZIM Integrated Shipping Services has a beta of 1.18, meaning that its stock price is 18% more volatile than the broader market.

Star Bulk Carriers pays an annual dividend of $3.60 per share and has a dividend yield of 12.0%. ZIM Integrated Shipping Services pays an annual dividend of $0.06 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.2%. Star Bulk Carriers pays out 141.2% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. ZIM Integrated Shipping Services pays out 5.2% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. ZIM Integrated Shipping Services has raised its dividend for 1 consecutive years.

Summary

Star Bulk Carriers beats ZIM Integrated Shipping Services on 12 of the 20 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does ZIM Integrated Shipping Services compare to Danaos?

ZIM Integrated Shipping Services (NYSE:ZIM) and Danaos (NYSE:DAC) are both mid-cap industrials companies, but which is the superior investment? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their valuation, analyst recommendations, media sentiment, profitability, institutional ownership, risk, dividends and earnings.

21.4% of ZIM Integrated Shipping Services shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 19.0% of Danaos shares are held by institutional investors. 1.3% of ZIM Integrated Shipping Services shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 41.0% of Danaos shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

ZIM Integrated Shipping Services has a beta of 1.18, indicating that its share price is 18% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Danaos has a beta of 0.87, indicating that its share price is 13% less volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, ZIM Integrated Shipping Services had 2 more articles in the media than Danaos. MarketBeat recorded 6 mentions for ZIM Integrated Shipping Services and 4 mentions for Danaos. ZIM Integrated Shipping Services' average media sentiment score of 0.60 beat Danaos' score of 0.57 indicating that ZIM Integrated Shipping Services is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
ZIM Integrated Shipping Services	1 Very Positive mention(s)	3 Positive mention(s)	2 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive
Danaos	1 Very Positive mention(s)	2 Positive mention(s)	1 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive

ZIM Integrated Shipping Services currently has a consensus target price of $21.50, suggesting a potential downside of 27.30%. Given ZIM Integrated Shipping Services' higher probable upside, research analysts clearly believe ZIM Integrated Shipping Services is more favorable than Danaos.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
ZIM Integrated Shipping Services	1 Sell rating(s)	6 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	1 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.13
Danaos	0 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	3 Strong Buy rating(s)	4.00

Danaos has lower revenue, but higher earnings than ZIM Integrated Shipping Services. Danaos is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than ZIM Integrated Shipping Services, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
ZIM Integrated Shipping Services	$6.44B	0.55	$479.20M	$1.15	25.72
Danaos	$1.06B	2.67	$494.61M	$29.55	5.23

ZIM Integrated Shipping Services pays an annual dividend of $0.06 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.2%. Danaos pays an annual dividend of $3.60 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.3%. ZIM Integrated Shipping Services pays out 5.2% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Danaos pays out 12.2% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. ZIM Integrated Shipping Services has raised its dividend for 1 consecutive years and Danaos has raised its dividend for 3 consecutive years. Danaos is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

Danaos has a net margin of 51.26% compared to ZIM Integrated Shipping Services' net margin of 2.15%. Danaos' return on equity of 13.20% beat ZIM Integrated Shipping Services' return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
ZIM Integrated Shipping Services	2.15%	1.11%	0.41%
Danaos	51.26%	13.20%	10.08%

Summary

Danaos beats ZIM Integrated Shipping Services on 11 of the 19 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get ZIM Integrated Shipping Services News Delivered to You Automatically

Subscribe Now

SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding ZIM and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of NYSE and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.

ZIM vs. The Competition

Export

Metric	ZIM Integrated Shipping Services	Marine Transportation Industry	Industrials Sector	NYSE Exchange
Market Cap	$3.57B	$5.49B	$10.22B	$22.83B
Dividend Yield	N/A	3.59%	96.94%	3.63%
P/E Ratio	25.74	13.13	25.20	27.93
Price / Sales	0.55	49.37	374.81	92.39
Price / Cash	2.22	6.44	24.10	38.68
Price / Book	0.88	1.21	4.85	4.64
Net Income	$479.20M	$367.90M	$613.71M	$1.07B
7 Day Performance	-2.60%	-0.51%	0.18%	-1.77%
1 Month Performance	4.25%	5.71%	-2.77%	-5.17%
1 Year Performance	104.32%	40.79%	3.86%	6.94%

ZIM Integrated Shipping Services Competitors List

Export

Company	MarketRank	Share Price	Analysts' Price Target	1Y Price Performance	Market Cap	Revenue	P/E Ratio	Employee Count	Indicator(s)
ZIM ZIM Integrated Shipping Services	2.3516 of 5 stars	$29.58 -1.7%	$21.50 -27.3%	+109.4%	$3.57B	$6.44B	25.74	4,714
KEX Kirby	4.5007 of 5 stars	$139.35 +0.3%	$163.20 +17.1%	+50.8%	$7.35B	$3.36B	21.43	5,233
MATX Matson	3.681 of 5 stars	$237.37 -0.5%	$232.33 -2.1%	+110.7%	$7.09B	$3.34B	15.86	4,170
CMBT CMB.TECH	3.3536 of 5 stars	$19.91 +1.8%	N/A	+87.8%	$3.98B	$2.27B	6.86	2,826	Positive News
SBLK Star Bulk Carriers	4.2274 of 5 stars	$30.96 -0.8%	$31.50 +1.7%	+53.6%	$3.52B	$1.20B	12.17	294	Positive News Insider Trade

Related Companies and Tools

Related Companies

Top 10 Stock Comparisons

This page (NYSE:ZIM) was last updated on 9/24/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.

From Our Partners

Unlock superior investment research and tools.

Get MarketBeat All Access

In-depth profiles and analysis for 20,000 public companies.
Real-time analyst ratings, insider transactions, earnings data, and more.
Our daily ratings and market update email newsletter.

Sign In
Create Account

Your Email Address:

Your Password:

Forgot your password?

Your Email Address:

Choose a Password:

By creating a free account, you agree to our terms of service. This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

ZIM Integrated Shipping Services (ZIM) Competitors

ZIM vs. KEX, MATX, CMBT, SBLK, and DAC

How does ZIM Integrated Shipping Services compare to Kirby?

Summary

How does ZIM Integrated Shipping Services compare to Matson?

Summary

How does ZIM Integrated Shipping Services compare to CMB.TECH?

Summary

How does ZIM Integrated Shipping Services compare to Star Bulk Carriers?

Summary

How does ZIM Integrated Shipping Services compare to Danaos?

Summary

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

Media Sentiment Over Time

ZIM vs. The Competition

ZIM Integrated Shipping Services Competitors List

Related Companies and Tools

Best-in-Class Portfolio Monitoring

Stock Ideas and Recommendations

Advanced Stock Screeners and Research Tools

About MarketBeat

MarketBeat Products

Popular Tools

Financial Calendars

Terms & Info

ZIM Integrated Shipping Services (ZIM) Competitors

ZIM vs. KEX, MATX, CMBT, SBLK, and DAC

How does ZIM Integrated Shipping Services compare to Kirby?

Do institutionals & insiders have more ownership in ZIM or KEX?

Which has better earnings and valuation, ZIM or KEX?

Does the media favor ZIM or KEX?

Which has more volatility & risk, ZIM or KEX?

Do analysts rate ZIM or KEX?

Is ZIM or KEX more profitable?

Summary

How does ZIM Integrated Shipping Services compare to Matson?

Does the media prefer MATX or ZIM?

Which has higher earnings & valuation, MATX or ZIM?

Do analysts rate MATX or ZIM?

Which has more volatility and risk, MATX or ZIM?

Do institutionals & insiders believe in MATX or ZIM?

Is MATX or ZIM a better dividend stock?

Is MATX or ZIM more profitable?

Summary

How does ZIM Integrated Shipping Services compare to CMB.TECH?

Is ZIM or CMBT more profitable?

Is ZIM or CMBT a better dividend stock?

Do insiders & institutionals have more ownership in ZIM or CMBT?

Do analysts prefer ZIM or CMBT?

Does the media favor ZIM or CMBT?

Which has higher earnings and valuation, ZIM or CMBT?

Which has more risk & volatility, ZIM or CMBT?

Summary

How does ZIM Integrated Shipping Services compare to Star Bulk Carriers?

Does the media refer more to SBLK or ZIM?

Do institutionals & insiders have more ownership in SBLK or ZIM?

Is SBLK or ZIM more profitable?

Do analysts rate SBLK or ZIM?

Which has higher earnings and valuation, SBLK or ZIM?

Which has more volatility & risk, SBLK or ZIM?

Is SBLK or ZIM a better dividend stock?

Summary

How does ZIM Integrated Shipping Services compare to Danaos?

Do insiders and institutionals hold more shares of ZIM or DAC?

Which has more risk and volatility, ZIM or DAC?

Does the media favor ZIM or DAC?

Do analysts prefer ZIM or DAC?

Which has stronger earnings & valuation, ZIM or DAC?

Is ZIM or DAC a better dividend stock?

Is ZIM or DAC more profitable?

Summary

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

Media Sentiment Over Time

ZIM vs. The Competition

ZIM Integrated Shipping Services Competitors List

Related Companies and Tools

MarketBeat All Access Features

Best-in-Class Portfolio Monitoring

Stock Ideas and Recommendations

Advanced Stock Screeners and Research Tools