Free Trial

ZIM Integrated Shipping Services (ZIM) Competitors

ZIM Integrated Shipping Services logo
$29.84 -0.60 (-1.96%)
Closing price 03:59 PM Eastern
Extended Trading
$29.90 +0.06 (+0.22%)
As of 07:09 PM Eastern
Extended trading is trading that happens on electronic markets outside of regular trading hours. This is a fair market value extended hours price provided by Massive. Learn more.

ZIM vs. KEX, MATX, CMBT, SBLK, and DAC

Should you buy ZIM Integrated Shipping Services stock or one of its competitors? ZIM Integrated Shipping Services's main competitors and comparable companies include Kirby (KEX), Matson (MATX), CMB.TECH (CMBT), Star Bulk Carriers (SBLK), and Danaos (DAC). Companies are selected based on similarities in market, industry, and size. These companies are all part of the "marine transportation" industry.

How does ZIM Integrated Shipping Services compare to Kirby?

Kirby (NYSE:KEX) and ZIM Integrated Shipping Services (NYSE:ZIM) are both mid-cap industrials companies, but which is the better business? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, profitability, dividends, valuation, risk, earnings, media sentiment and institutional ownership.

ZIM Integrated Shipping Services has higher revenue and earnings than Kirby. Kirby is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than ZIM Integrated Shipping Services, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Kirby$3.36B2.15$354.57M$6.5021.06
ZIM Integrated Shipping Services$6.90B0.53$479.20M$1.1526.46

Kirby has a beta of 0.84, suggesting that its share price is 16% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, ZIM Integrated Shipping Services has a beta of 1.22, suggesting that its share price is 22% more volatile than the broader market.

96.2% of Kirby shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 21.4% of ZIM Integrated Shipping Services shares are held by institutional investors. 0.8% of Kirby shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 1.3% of ZIM Integrated Shipping Services shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Kirby presently has a consensus target price of $163.00, indicating a potential upside of 19.06%. ZIM Integrated Shipping Services has a consensus target price of $22.42, indicating a potential downside of 26.32%. Given Kirby's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Kirby is more favorable than ZIM Integrated Shipping Services.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Kirby
0 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
6 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.86
ZIM Integrated Shipping Services
1 Sell rating(s)
6 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.13

In the previous week, ZIM Integrated Shipping Services had 4 more articles in the media than Kirby. MarketBeat recorded 9 mentions for ZIM Integrated Shipping Services and 5 mentions for Kirby. ZIM Integrated Shipping Services' average media sentiment score of 1.03 beat Kirby's score of 0.27 indicating that ZIM Integrated Shipping Services is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Kirby
0 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
2 Neutral mention(s)
1 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral
ZIM Integrated Shipping Services
7 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

Kirby has a net margin of 10.18% compared to ZIM Integrated Shipping Services' net margin of 2.15%. Kirby's return on equity of 10.44% beat ZIM Integrated Shipping Services' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Kirby10.18% 10.44% 5.82%
ZIM Integrated Shipping Services 2.15%1.11%0.41%

Summary

Kirby beats ZIM Integrated Shipping Services on 9 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does ZIM Integrated Shipping Services compare to Matson?

ZIM Integrated Shipping Services (NYSE:ZIM) and Matson (NYSE:MATX) are both mid-cap industrials companies, but which is the superior investment? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their earnings, media sentiment, risk, dividends, profitability, analyst recommendations, institutional ownership and valuation.

21.4% of ZIM Integrated Shipping Services shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 84.8% of Matson shares are owned by institutional investors. 1.3% of ZIM Integrated Shipping Services shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 2.5% of Matson shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

ZIM Integrated Shipping Services has a beta of 1.22, indicating that its share price is 22% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Matson has a beta of 1.3, indicating that its share price is 30% more volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, ZIM Integrated Shipping Services and ZIM Integrated Shipping Services both had 9 articles in the media. ZIM Integrated Shipping Services' average media sentiment score of 1.03 beat Matson's score of -0.17 indicating that ZIM Integrated Shipping Services is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
ZIM Integrated Shipping Services
7 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
Matson
1 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
4 Neutral mention(s)
1 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral

Matson has a net margin of 13.41% compared to ZIM Integrated Shipping Services' net margin of 2.15%. Matson's return on equity of 16.94% beat ZIM Integrated Shipping Services' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
ZIM Integrated Shipping Services2.15% 1.11% 0.41%
Matson 13.41%16.94%10.01%

ZIM Integrated Shipping Services currently has a consensus target price of $22.42, indicating a potential downside of 26.32%. Matson has a consensus target price of $249.25, indicating a potential upside of 5.79%. Given Matson's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Matson is more favorable than ZIM Integrated Shipping Services.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
ZIM Integrated Shipping Services
1 Sell rating(s)
6 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.13
Matson
0 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
5 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.83

ZIM Integrated Shipping Services has higher revenue and earnings than Matson. Matson is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than ZIM Integrated Shipping Services, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
ZIM Integrated Shipping Services$6.90B0.53$479.20M$1.1526.46
Matson$3.34B2.11$444.80M$14.9615.75

Summary

Matson beats ZIM Integrated Shipping Services on 11 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does ZIM Integrated Shipping Services compare to CMB.TECH?

ZIM Integrated Shipping Services (NYSE:ZIM) and CMB.TECH (NYSE:CMBT) are both mid-cap industrials companies, but which is the better stock? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their valuation, dividends, earnings, risk, profitability, analyst recommendations, institutional ownership and media sentiment.

ZIM Integrated Shipping Services has a beta of 1.22, indicating that its share price is 22% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, CMB.TECH has a beta of 0.23, indicating that its share price is 77% less volatile than the broader market.

ZIM Integrated Shipping Services currently has a consensus price target of $22.42, indicating a potential downside of 26.32%. Given ZIM Integrated Shipping Services' higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe ZIM Integrated Shipping Services is more favorable than CMB.TECH.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
ZIM Integrated Shipping Services
1 Sell rating(s)
6 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.13
CMB.TECH
0 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
2 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.33

21.4% of ZIM Integrated Shipping Services shares are owned by institutional investors. 1.3% of ZIM Integrated Shipping Services shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

In the previous week, ZIM Integrated Shipping Services had 1 more articles in the media than CMB.TECH. MarketBeat recorded 9 mentions for ZIM Integrated Shipping Services and 8 mentions for CMB.TECH. ZIM Integrated Shipping Services' average media sentiment score of 1.03 beat CMB.TECH's score of 0.32 indicating that ZIM Integrated Shipping Services is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
ZIM Integrated Shipping Services
7 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
CMB.TECH
1 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
5 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral

ZIM Integrated Shipping Services has higher revenue and earnings than CMB.TECH. CMB.TECH is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than ZIM Integrated Shipping Services, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
ZIM Integrated Shipping Services$6.90B0.53$479.20M$1.1526.46
CMB.TECH$1.67B2.49$160.70M$2.917.14

CMB.TECH has a net margin of 37.19% compared to ZIM Integrated Shipping Services' net margin of 2.15%. CMB.TECH's return on equity of 30.02% beat ZIM Integrated Shipping Services' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
ZIM Integrated Shipping Services2.15% 1.11% 0.41%
CMB.TECH 37.19%30.02%9.90%

Summary

ZIM Integrated Shipping Services beats CMB.TECH on 9 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does ZIM Integrated Shipping Services compare to Star Bulk Carriers?

Star Bulk Carriers (NASDAQ:SBLK) and ZIM Integrated Shipping Services (NYSE:ZIM) are both mid-cap industrials companies, but which is the better investment? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their profitability, dividends, analyst recommendations, risk, institutional ownership, earnings, media sentiment and valuation.

In the previous week, Star Bulk Carriers had 2 more articles in the media than ZIM Integrated Shipping Services. MarketBeat recorded 11 mentions for Star Bulk Carriers and 9 mentions for ZIM Integrated Shipping Services. ZIM Integrated Shipping Services' average media sentiment score of 1.03 beat Star Bulk Carriers' score of 0.48 indicating that ZIM Integrated Shipping Services is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Star Bulk Carriers
4 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
4 Neutral mention(s)
1 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral
ZIM Integrated Shipping Services
7 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

Star Bulk Carriers presently has a consensus price target of $31.50, suggesting a potential upside of 5.74%. ZIM Integrated Shipping Services has a consensus price target of $22.42, suggesting a potential downside of 26.32%. Given Star Bulk Carriers' stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, equities research analysts clearly believe Star Bulk Carriers is more favorable than ZIM Integrated Shipping Services.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Star Bulk Carriers
0 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
3 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.75
ZIM Integrated Shipping Services
1 Sell rating(s)
6 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.13

Star Bulk Carriers has a beta of 0.74, indicating that its share price is 26% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, ZIM Integrated Shipping Services has a beta of 1.22, indicating that its share price is 22% more volatile than the broader market.

33.9% of Star Bulk Carriers shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 21.4% of ZIM Integrated Shipping Services shares are held by institutional investors. 1.3% of ZIM Integrated Shipping Services shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Star Bulk Carriers has a net margin of 23.87% compared to ZIM Integrated Shipping Services' net margin of 2.15%. Star Bulk Carriers' return on equity of 11.72% beat ZIM Integrated Shipping Services' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Star Bulk Carriers23.87% 11.72% 7.61%
ZIM Integrated Shipping Services 2.15%1.11%0.41%

ZIM Integrated Shipping Services has higher revenue and earnings than Star Bulk Carriers. Star Bulk Carriers is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than ZIM Integrated Shipping Services, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Star Bulk Carriers$1.04B3.24$84.17M$2.5511.68
ZIM Integrated Shipping Services$6.90B0.53$479.20M$1.1526.46

Summary

Star Bulk Carriers beats ZIM Integrated Shipping Services on 10 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does ZIM Integrated Shipping Services compare to Danaos?

Danaos (NYSE:DAC) and ZIM Integrated Shipping Services (NYSE:ZIM) are both mid-cap industrials companies, but which is the superior investment? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their risk, analyst recommendations, institutional ownership, valuation, dividends, earnings, media sentiment and profitability.

ZIM Integrated Shipping Services has a consensus target price of $22.42, suggesting a potential downside of 26.32%. Given ZIM Integrated Shipping Services' higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe ZIM Integrated Shipping Services is more favorable than Danaos.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Danaos
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
3 Strong Buy rating(s)
4.00
ZIM Integrated Shipping Services
1 Sell rating(s)
6 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.13

19.0% of Danaos shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 21.4% of ZIM Integrated Shipping Services shares are held by institutional investors. 41.0% of Danaos shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 1.3% of ZIM Integrated Shipping Services shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

In the previous week, ZIM Integrated Shipping Services had 4 more articles in the media than Danaos. MarketBeat recorded 9 mentions for ZIM Integrated Shipping Services and 5 mentions for Danaos. ZIM Integrated Shipping Services' average media sentiment score of 1.03 beat Danaos' score of 0.18 indicating that ZIM Integrated Shipping Services is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Danaos
1 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
4 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral
ZIM Integrated Shipping Services
7 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

Danaos has a beta of 0.87, suggesting that its stock price is 13% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, ZIM Integrated Shipping Services has a beta of 1.22, suggesting that its stock price is 22% more volatile than the broader market.

Danaos has higher earnings, but lower revenue than ZIM Integrated Shipping Services. Danaos is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than ZIM Integrated Shipping Services, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Danaos$1.04B2.88$494.61M$29.555.59
ZIM Integrated Shipping Services$6.90B0.53$479.20M$1.1526.46

Danaos has a net margin of 51.26% compared to ZIM Integrated Shipping Services' net margin of 2.15%. Danaos' return on equity of 13.20% beat ZIM Integrated Shipping Services' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Danaos51.26% 13.20% 10.08%
ZIM Integrated Shipping Services 2.15%1.11%0.41%

Summary

Danaos beats ZIM Integrated Shipping Services on 9 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get ZIM Integrated Shipping Services News Delivered to You Automatically

Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for ZIM and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.

Subscribe Now
SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding ZIM and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.
Skip Chart

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of NYSE and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Skip Chart

ZIM vs. The Competition

MetricZIM Integrated Shipping ServicesMarine Transportation IndustryIndustrials SectorNYSE Exchange
Market Cap$3.60B$5.55B$10.11B$22.95B
Dividend YieldN/A3.71%96.64%3.72%
P/E Ratio25.9413.4226.3528.09
Price / Sales0.5262.50277.8620.98
Price / Cash2.256.4023.8037.05
Price / Book0.891.194.654.66
Net Income$479.20M$367.90M$614.62M$1.07B
7 Day Performance-0.49%-0.99%-2.45%-0.92%
1 Month Performance0.23%4.82%-4.10%-4.56%
1 Year Performance122.40%51.46%0.06%5.23%

ZIM Integrated Shipping Services Competitors List

CompanyMarketRankShare PriceAnalysts' Price Target1Y Price PerformanceMarket CapRevenueP/E RatioEmployee CountIndicator(s)
ZIM
ZIM Integrated Shipping Services
2.0338 of 5 stars
$29.84
-2.0%
$22.42
-24.9%
+139.5%$3.60B$6.90B25.944,714
KEX
Kirby
4.091 of 5 stars
$136.46
-1.5%
$163.20
+19.6%
+68.2%$7.21B$3.36B21.005,233
MATX
Matson
3.5079 of 5 stars
$224.46
-0.1%
$239.25
+6.6%
+161.1%$6.71B$3.34B15.004,170
CMBT
CMB.TECH
2.2138 of 5 stars
$20.12
+2.2%
N/A+119.0%$4.01B$2.27B6.922,752
SBLK
Star Bulk Carriers
4.3017 of 5 stars
$29.78
-0.3%
$31.50
+5.8%
+71.5%$3.38B$1.20B11.67294

Related Companies and Tools


This page (NYSE:ZIM) was last updated on 10/14/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.
From Our Partners