Does the media favor KEX or ZIM?

In the previous week, Kirby and Kirby both had 6 articles in the media. Kirby's average media sentiment score of 1.49 beat ZIM Integrated Shipping Services' score of 0.47 indicating that Kirby is being referred to more favorably in the media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment Kirby 6 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 0 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive ZIM Integrated Shipping Services 3 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 0 Neutral mention(s) 2 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Neutral

Does the media refer more to MATX or ZIM?

In the previous week, Matson had 5 more articles in the media than ZIM Integrated Shipping Services. MarketBeat recorded 11 mentions for Matson and 6 mentions for ZIM Integrated Shipping Services. Matson's average media sentiment score of 1.42 beat ZIM Integrated Shipping Services' score of 0.47 indicating that Matson is being referred to more favorably in the media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment Matson 10 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 1 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive ZIM Integrated Shipping Services 3 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 0 Neutral mention(s) 2 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Neutral

Do analysts prefer CMBT or ZIM?

ZIM Integrated Shipping Services has a consensus target price of $19.83, indicating a potential downside of 30.75%. Given ZIM Integrated Shipping Services' higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe ZIM Integrated Shipping Services is more favorable than CMB.TECH. Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score CMB.TECH 0 Sell rating(s) 1 Hold rating(s) 0 Buy rating(s) 2 Strong Buy rating(s) 3.33 ZIM Integrated Shipping Services 2 Sell rating(s) 5 Hold rating(s) 0 Buy rating(s) 1 Strong Buy rating(s) 2.00

Does the media refer more to CMBT or ZIM?

In the previous week, CMB.TECH and CMB.TECH both had 6 articles in the media. CMB.TECH's average media sentiment score of 0.94 beat ZIM Integrated Shipping Services' score of 0.47 indicating that CMB.TECH is being referred to more favorably in the media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment CMB.TECH 3 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 3 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive ZIM Integrated Shipping Services 3 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 0 Neutral mention(s) 2 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Neutral

Does the media prefer ZIM or SBLK?

In the previous week, ZIM Integrated Shipping Services had 3 more articles in the media than Star Bulk Carriers. MarketBeat recorded 6 mentions for ZIM Integrated Shipping Services and 3 mentions for Star Bulk Carriers. Star Bulk Carriers' average media sentiment score of 1.05 beat ZIM Integrated Shipping Services' score of 0.47 indicating that Star Bulk Carriers is being referred to more favorably in the news media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment ZIM Integrated Shipping Services 3 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 0 Neutral mention(s) 2 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Neutral Star Bulk Carriers 1 Very Positive mention(s) 1 Positive mention(s) 0 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive

Do analysts recommend ZIM or DAC?

ZIM Integrated Shipping Services currently has a consensus price target of $19.83, indicating a potential downside of 30.75%. Given ZIM Integrated Shipping Services' higher probable upside, equities research analysts clearly believe ZIM Integrated Shipping Services is more favorable than Danaos. Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score ZIM Integrated Shipping Services 2 Sell rating(s) 5 Hold rating(s) 0 Buy rating(s) 1 Strong Buy rating(s) 2.00 Danaos 0 Sell rating(s) 0 Hold rating(s) 0 Buy rating(s) 3 Strong Buy rating(s) 4.00

Does the media favor ZIM or DAC?

In the previous week, ZIM Integrated Shipping Services and ZIM Integrated Shipping Services both had 6 articles in the media. Danaos' average media sentiment score of 0.76 beat ZIM Integrated Shipping Services' score of 0.47 indicating that Danaos is being referred to more favorably in the news media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment ZIM Integrated Shipping Services 3 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 0 Neutral mention(s) 2 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Neutral Danaos 3 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 3 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive

ZIM Integrated Shipping Services (ZIM) Competitors

$28.54 +0.95 (+3.43%)

As of 01:11 PM Eastern

Compare

ZIM vs. KEX, MATX, CMBT, SBLK, and DAC

Should you buy ZIM Integrated Shipping Services stock or one of its competitors? ZIM Integrated Shipping Services's main competitors and comparable companies include Kirby (KEX), Matson (MATX), CMB.TECH (CMBT), Star Bulk Carriers (SBLK), and Danaos (DAC). Companies are selected based on similarities in market, industry, and size. These companies are all part of the "marine transportation" industry.

How does ZIM Integrated Shipping Services compare to Kirby?

Kirby (NYSE:KEX) and ZIM Integrated Shipping Services (NYSE:ZIM) are both mid-cap industrials companies, but which is the superior investment? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their profitability, analyst recommendations, media sentiment, earnings, institutional ownership, dividends, valuation and risk.

96.2% of Kirby shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 21.4% of ZIM Integrated Shipping Services shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.8% of Kirby shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 1.3% of ZIM Integrated Shipping Services shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Kirby has a net margin of 10.18% compared to ZIM Integrated Shipping Services' net margin of 2.15%. Kirby's return on equity of 10.44% beat ZIM Integrated Shipping Services' return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Kirby	10.18%	10.44%	5.82%
ZIM Integrated Shipping Services	2.15%	1.11%	0.41%

Kirby presently has a consensus target price of $163.20, indicating a potential upside of 14.95%. ZIM Integrated Shipping Services has a consensus target price of $19.83, indicating a potential downside of 30.75%. Given Kirby's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, equities research analysts plainly believe Kirby is more favorable than ZIM Integrated Shipping Services.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Kirby	0 Sell rating(s)	2 Hold rating(s)	5 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.71
ZIM Integrated Shipping Services	2 Sell rating(s)	5 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	1 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.00

Kirby has a beta of 0.86, suggesting that its share price is 14% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, ZIM Integrated Shipping Services has a beta of 1.18, suggesting that its share price is 18% more volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, Kirby and Kirby both had 6 articles in the media. Kirby's average media sentiment score of 1.49 beat ZIM Integrated Shipping Services' score of 0.47 indicating that Kirby is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Kirby	6 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	0 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive
ZIM Integrated Shipping Services	3 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	0 Neutral mention(s)	2 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Neutral

ZIM Integrated Shipping Services has higher revenue and earnings than Kirby. Kirby is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than ZIM Integrated Shipping Services, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Kirby	$3.36B	2.23	$354.57M	$6.50	21.84
ZIM Integrated Shipping Services	$6.90B	0.50	$479.20M	$1.15	24.91

Summary

Kirby beats ZIM Integrated Shipping Services on 10 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does ZIM Integrated Shipping Services compare to Matson?

Matson (NYSE:MATX) and ZIM Integrated Shipping Services (NYSE:ZIM) are both mid-cap industrials companies, but which is the superior business? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, institutional ownership, dividends, earnings, profitability, media sentiment, valuation and risk.

In the previous week, Matson had 5 more articles in the media than ZIM Integrated Shipping Services. MarketBeat recorded 11 mentions for Matson and 6 mentions for ZIM Integrated Shipping Services. Matson's average media sentiment score of 1.42 beat ZIM Integrated Shipping Services' score of 0.47 indicating that Matson is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Matson	10 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	1 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive
ZIM Integrated Shipping Services	3 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	0 Neutral mention(s)	2 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Neutral

Matson has a net margin of 13.41% compared to ZIM Integrated Shipping Services' net margin of 2.15%. Matson's return on equity of 16.94% beat ZIM Integrated Shipping Services' return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Matson	13.41%	16.94%	10.01%
ZIM Integrated Shipping Services	2.15%	1.11%	0.41%

ZIM Integrated Shipping Services has higher revenue and earnings than Matson. Matson is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than ZIM Integrated Shipping Services, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Matson	$3.34B	2.02	$444.80M	$14.96	15.12
ZIM Integrated Shipping Services	$6.90B	0.50	$479.20M	$1.15	24.91

Matson presently has a consensus target price of $232.33, indicating a potential upside of 2.75%. ZIM Integrated Shipping Services has a consensus target price of $19.83, indicating a potential downside of 30.75%. Given Matson's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, research analysts plainly believe Matson is more favorable than ZIM Integrated Shipping Services.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Matson	0 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	4 Buy rating(s)	1 Strong Buy rating(s)	3.20
ZIM Integrated Shipping Services	2 Sell rating(s)	5 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	1 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.00

Matson has a beta of 1.26, indicating that its share price is 26% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, ZIM Integrated Shipping Services has a beta of 1.18, indicating that its share price is 18% more volatile than the broader market.

84.8% of Matson shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 21.4% of ZIM Integrated Shipping Services shares are held by institutional investors. 2.5% of Matson shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 1.3% of ZIM Integrated Shipping Services shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Summary

Matson beats ZIM Integrated Shipping Services on 13 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does ZIM Integrated Shipping Services compare to CMB.TECH?

CMB.TECH (NYSE:CMBT) and ZIM Integrated Shipping Services (NYSE:ZIM) are both mid-cap industrials companies, but which is the superior investment? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their dividends, media sentiment, valuation, analyst recommendations, risk, institutional ownership, profitability and earnings.

CMB.TECH has a beta of 0.14, meaning that its stock price is 86% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, ZIM Integrated Shipping Services has a beta of 1.18, meaning that its stock price is 18% more volatile than the broader market.

CMB.TECH has a net margin of 37.19% compared to ZIM Integrated Shipping Services' net margin of 2.15%. CMB.TECH's return on equity of 30.02% beat ZIM Integrated Shipping Services' return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
CMB.TECH	37.19%	30.02%	9.90%
ZIM Integrated Shipping Services	2.15%	1.11%	0.41%

ZIM Integrated Shipping Services has higher revenue and earnings than CMB.TECH. CMB.TECH is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than ZIM Integrated Shipping Services, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
CMB.TECH	$1.67B	2.33	$160.70M	$2.91	6.69
ZIM Integrated Shipping Services	$6.90B	0.50	$479.20M	$1.15	24.91

21.4% of ZIM Integrated Shipping Services shares are owned by institutional investors. 1.3% of ZIM Integrated Shipping Services shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

ZIM Integrated Shipping Services has a consensus target price of $19.83, indicating a potential downside of 30.75%. Given ZIM Integrated Shipping Services' higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe ZIM Integrated Shipping Services is more favorable than CMB.TECH.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
CMB.TECH	0 Sell rating(s)	1 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	2 Strong Buy rating(s)	3.33
ZIM Integrated Shipping Services	2 Sell rating(s)	5 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	1 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.00

In the previous week, CMB.TECH and CMB.TECH both had 6 articles in the media. CMB.TECH's average media sentiment score of 0.94 beat ZIM Integrated Shipping Services' score of 0.47 indicating that CMB.TECH is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
CMB.TECH	3 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	3 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive
ZIM Integrated Shipping Services	3 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	0 Neutral mention(s)	2 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Neutral

Summary

CMB.TECH beats ZIM Integrated Shipping Services on 8 of the 15 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does ZIM Integrated Shipping Services compare to Star Bulk Carriers?

ZIM Integrated Shipping Services (NYSE:ZIM) and Star Bulk Carriers (NASDAQ:SBLK) are both mid-cap industrials companies, but which is the better investment? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their earnings, risk, dividends, media sentiment, valuation, institutional ownership, profitability and analyst recommendations.

Star Bulk Carriers has a net margin of 23.87% compared to ZIM Integrated Shipping Services' net margin of 2.15%. Star Bulk Carriers' return on equity of 11.72% beat ZIM Integrated Shipping Services' return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
ZIM Integrated Shipping Services	2.15%	1.11%	0.41%
Star Bulk Carriers	23.87%	11.72%	7.61%

ZIM Integrated Shipping Services has a beta of 1.18, suggesting that its share price is 18% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Star Bulk Carriers has a beta of 0.7, suggesting that its share price is 30% less volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, ZIM Integrated Shipping Services had 3 more articles in the media than Star Bulk Carriers. MarketBeat recorded 6 mentions for ZIM Integrated Shipping Services and 3 mentions for Star Bulk Carriers. Star Bulk Carriers' average media sentiment score of 1.05 beat ZIM Integrated Shipping Services' score of 0.47 indicating that Star Bulk Carriers is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
ZIM Integrated Shipping Services	3 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	0 Neutral mention(s)	2 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Neutral
Star Bulk Carriers	1 Very Positive mention(s)	1 Positive mention(s)	0 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive

ZIM Integrated Shipping Services has higher revenue and earnings than Star Bulk Carriers. Star Bulk Carriers is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than ZIM Integrated Shipping Services, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
ZIM Integrated Shipping Services	$6.90B	0.50	$479.20M	$1.15	24.91
Star Bulk Carriers	$1.20B	3.06	$84.17M	$2.55	12.74

21.4% of ZIM Integrated Shipping Services shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 33.9% of Star Bulk Carriers shares are owned by institutional investors. 1.3% of ZIM Integrated Shipping Services shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 0.9% of Star Bulk Carriers shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

ZIM Integrated Shipping Services currently has a consensus target price of $19.83, suggesting a potential downside of 30.75%. Star Bulk Carriers has a consensus target price of $31.50, suggesting a potential downside of 3.07%. Given Star Bulk Carriers' stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Star Bulk Carriers is more favorable than ZIM Integrated Shipping Services.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
ZIM Integrated Shipping Services	2 Sell rating(s)	5 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	1 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.00
Star Bulk Carriers	0 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	3 Buy rating(s)	1 Strong Buy rating(s)	3.25

Summary

Star Bulk Carriers beats ZIM Integrated Shipping Services on 10 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does ZIM Integrated Shipping Services compare to Danaos?

ZIM Integrated Shipping Services (NYSE:ZIM) and Danaos (NYSE:DAC) are both mid-cap industrials companies, but which is the superior investment? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their earnings, risk, media sentiment, institutional ownership, profitability, analyst recommendations, valuation and dividends.

ZIM Integrated Shipping Services has a beta of 1.18, indicating that its stock price is 18% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Danaos has a beta of 0.87, indicating that its stock price is 13% less volatile than the broader market.

Danaos has lower revenue, but higher earnings than ZIM Integrated Shipping Services. Danaos is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than ZIM Integrated Shipping Services, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
ZIM Integrated Shipping Services	$6.90B	0.50	$479.20M	$1.15	24.91
Danaos	$1.04B	2.71	$494.61M	$29.55	5.24

Danaos has a net margin of 51.26% compared to ZIM Integrated Shipping Services' net margin of 2.15%. Danaos' return on equity of 13.20% beat ZIM Integrated Shipping Services' return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
ZIM Integrated Shipping Services	2.15%	1.11%	0.41%
Danaos	51.26%	13.20%	10.08%

ZIM Integrated Shipping Services currently has a consensus price target of $19.83, indicating a potential downside of 30.75%. Given ZIM Integrated Shipping Services' higher probable upside, equities research analysts clearly believe ZIM Integrated Shipping Services is more favorable than Danaos.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
ZIM Integrated Shipping Services	2 Sell rating(s)	5 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	1 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.00
Danaos	0 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	3 Strong Buy rating(s)	4.00

21.4% of ZIM Integrated Shipping Services shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 19.0% of Danaos shares are owned by institutional investors. 1.3% of ZIM Integrated Shipping Services shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 41.0% of Danaos shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

In the previous week, ZIM Integrated Shipping Services and ZIM Integrated Shipping Services both had 6 articles in the media. Danaos' average media sentiment score of 0.76 beat ZIM Integrated Shipping Services' score of 0.47 indicating that Danaos is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
ZIM Integrated Shipping Services	3 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	0 Neutral mention(s)	2 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Neutral
Danaos	3 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	3 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive

Summary

Danaos beats ZIM Integrated Shipping Services on 10 of the 15 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get ZIM Integrated Shipping Services News Delivered to You Automatically

Subscribe Now

SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding ZIM and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of NYSE and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.

ZIM vs. The Competition

Export

Metric	ZIM Integrated Shipping Services	Marine Transportation Industry	Industrials Sector	NYSE Exchange
Market Cap	$3.45B	$5.38B	$10.44B	$23.52B
Dividend Yield	N/A	3.57%	97.16%	3.73%
P/E Ratio	24.90	13.41	26.28	29.43
Price / Sales	0.50	47.36	380.94	19.68
Price / Cash	2.04	6.53	23.94	32.15
Price / Book	0.89	1.17	4.62	7.60
Net Income	$479.20M	$358.06M	$609.95M	$1.07B
7 Day Performance	4.36%	0.94%	-0.82%	-0.03%
1 Month Performance	4.45%	9.21%	-1.45%	-0.38%
1 Year Performance	114.44%	44.04%	10.37%	13.27%

ZIM Integrated Shipping Services Competitors List

Export

Company	MarketRank	Share Price	Analysts' Price Target	1Y Price Performance	Market Cap	Revenue	P/E Ratio	Employee Count	Indicator(s)
ZIM ZIM Integrated Shipping Services	2.4067 of 5 stars	$28.54 +3.4%	$19.83 -30.5%	+104.1%	$3.44B	$6.90B	24.83	4,714	Analyst Forecast
KEX Kirby	4.0095 of 5 stars	$139.46 +1.3%	$163.20 +17.0%	+61.4%	$7.36B	$3.36B	21.46	5,233	Positive News
MATX Matson	4.1512 of 5 stars	$221.64 -0.5%	$232.33 +4.8%	+119.3%	$6.63B	$3.34B	14.82	4,170	Positive News
CMBT CMB.TECH	2.602 of 5 stars	$17.72 -2.5%	N/A	+111.3%	$3.53B	$1.67B	10.49	2,752	Earnings Report Gap Up
SBLK Star Bulk Carriers	2.3966 of 5 stars	$29.72 -4.5%	$31.50 +6.0%	+68.4%	$3.37B	$1.20B	11.65	180	Positive News Options Volume

Related Companies and Tools

Related Companies

Top 10 Stock Comparisons

This page (NYSE:ZIM) was last updated on 9/4/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.

From Our Partners

Unlock superior investment research and tools.

Get MarketBeat All Access

In-depth profiles and analysis for 20,000 public companies.
Real-time analyst ratings, insider transactions, earnings data, and more.
Our daily ratings and market update email newsletter.

Sign In
Create Account

Your Email Address:

Your Password:

Forgot your password?

Your Email Address:

Choose a Password:

By creating a free account, you agree to our terms of service. This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

ZIM Integrated Shipping Services (ZIM) Competitors

ZIM vs. KEX, MATX, CMBT, SBLK, and DAC

How does ZIM Integrated Shipping Services compare to Kirby?

Summary

How does ZIM Integrated Shipping Services compare to Matson?

Summary

How does ZIM Integrated Shipping Services compare to CMB.TECH?

Summary

How does ZIM Integrated Shipping Services compare to Star Bulk Carriers?

Summary

How does ZIM Integrated Shipping Services compare to Danaos?

Summary

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

Media Sentiment Over Time

ZIM vs. The Competition

ZIM Integrated Shipping Services Competitors List

Related Companies and Tools

Best-in-Class Portfolio Monitoring

Stock Ideas and Recommendations

Advanced Stock Screeners and Research Tools

About MarketBeat

MarketBeat Products

Popular Tools

Financial Calendars

Terms & Info

ZIM Integrated Shipping Services (ZIM) Competitors

ZIM vs. KEX, MATX, CMBT, SBLK, and DAC

How does ZIM Integrated Shipping Services compare to Kirby?

Do insiders and institutionals have more ownership in KEX or ZIM?

Is KEX or ZIM more profitable?

Do analysts recommend KEX or ZIM?

Which has more risk & volatility, KEX or ZIM?

Does the media favor KEX or ZIM?

Which has higher valuation & earnings, KEX or ZIM?

Summary

How does ZIM Integrated Shipping Services compare to Matson?

Does the media refer more to MATX or ZIM?

Is MATX or ZIM more profitable?

Which has stronger valuation & earnings, MATX or ZIM?

Do analysts prefer MATX or ZIM?

Which has more volatility & risk, MATX or ZIM?

Do insiders & institutionals have more ownership in MATX or ZIM?

Summary

How does ZIM Integrated Shipping Services compare to CMB.TECH?

Which has more volatility and risk, CMBT or ZIM?

Is CMBT or ZIM more profitable?

Which has preferable valuation and earnings, CMBT or ZIM?

Do institutionals and insiders believe in CMBT or ZIM?

Do analysts prefer CMBT or ZIM?

Does the media refer more to CMBT or ZIM?

Summary

How does ZIM Integrated Shipping Services compare to Star Bulk Carriers?

Is ZIM or SBLK more profitable?

Which has more risk and volatility, ZIM or SBLK?

Does the media prefer ZIM or SBLK?

Which has higher earnings and valuation, ZIM or SBLK?

Do insiders and institutionals have more ownership in ZIM or SBLK?

Do analysts recommend ZIM or SBLK?

Summary

How does ZIM Integrated Shipping Services compare to Danaos?

Which has more risk and volatility, ZIM or DAC?

Which has better valuation and earnings, ZIM or DAC?

Is ZIM or DAC more profitable?

Do analysts recommend ZIM or DAC?

Do insiders & institutionals believe in ZIM or DAC?

Does the media favor ZIM or DAC?

Summary

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

Media Sentiment Over Time

ZIM vs. The Competition

ZIM Integrated Shipping Services Competitors List

Related Companies and Tools

MarketBeat All Access Features

Best-in-Class Portfolio Monitoring

Stock Ideas and Recommendations

Advanced Stock Screeners and Research Tools