EQT Competitors

ConocoPhillips (NYSE:COP) and EQT (NYSE:EQT) are both oils/energy companies, but which is the superior stock? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, earnings, valuation, dividends, institutional ownership, profitability and risk.

Profitability

This table compares ConocoPhillips and EQT's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a summary of recent ratings and price targets for ConocoPhillips and EQT, as provided by MarketBeat.

ConocoPhillips presently has a consensus price target of $51.5417, suggesting a potential downside of 11.65%. EQT has a consensus price target of $17.3529, suggesting a potential downside of 3.49%. Given EQT's higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe EQT is more favorable than ConocoPhillips.

Volatility & Risk

ConocoPhillips has a beta of 1.85, meaning that its share price is 85% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, EQT has a beta of 1.26, meaning that its share price is 26% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Insider & Institutional Ownership

72.9% of ConocoPhillips shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 93.8% of EQT shares are held by institutional investors. 0.7% of ConocoPhillips shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.6% of EQT shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Valuation and Earnings

This table compares ConocoPhillips and EQT's revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

ConocoPhillips has higher revenue and earnings than EQT. ConocoPhillips is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than EQT, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Summary

ConocoPhillips beats EQT on 11 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

EOG Resources (NYSE:EOG) and EQT (NYSE:EQT) are both oils/energy companies, but which is the superior stock? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, earnings, valuation, dividends, institutional ownership, profitability and risk.

Profitability

This table compares EOG Resources and EQT's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a summary of recent ratings and price targets for EOG Resources and EQT, as provided by MarketBeat.

EOG Resources presently has a consensus price target of $64.8696, suggesting a potential downside of 13.02%. EQT has a consensus price target of $17.3529, suggesting a potential downside of 3.49%. Given EQT's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe EQT is more favorable than EOG Resources.

Volatility & Risk

EOG Resources has a beta of 2.09, meaning that its share price is 109% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, EQT has a beta of 1.26, meaning that its share price is 26% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Insider & Institutional Ownership

87.7% of EOG Resources shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 93.8% of EQT shares are held by institutional investors. 0.3% of EOG Resources shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.6% of EQT shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Valuation and Earnings

This table compares EOG Resources and EQT's revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

EOG Resources has higher revenue and earnings than EQT. EOG Resources is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than EQT, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Summary

EOG Resources beats EQT on 9 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

Pioneer Natural Resources (NYSE:PXD) and EQT (NYSE:EQT) are both oils/energy companies, but which is the superior stock? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, earnings, valuation, dividends, institutional ownership, profitability and risk.

Profitability

This table compares Pioneer Natural Resources and EQT's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a summary of recent ratings and price targets for Pioneer Natural Resources and EQT, as provided by MarketBeat.

Pioneer Natural Resources presently has a consensus price target of $140.0435, suggesting a potential downside of 14.39%. EQT has a consensus price target of $17.3529, suggesting a potential downside of 3.49%. Given EQT's higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe EQT is more favorable than Pioneer Natural Resources.

Volatility & Risk

Pioneer Natural Resources has a beta of 1.92, meaning that its share price is 92% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, EQT has a beta of 1.26, meaning that its share price is 26% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Insider & Institutional Ownership

89.9% of Pioneer Natural Resources shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 93.8% of EQT shares are held by institutional investors. 0.9% of Pioneer Natural Resources shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.6% of EQT shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Valuation and Earnings

This table compares Pioneer Natural Resources and EQT's revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

Pioneer Natural Resources has higher revenue and earnings than EQT. Pioneer Natural Resources is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than EQT, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Summary

Pioneer Natural Resources beats EQT on 13 of the 15 factors compared between the two stocks.

Devon Energy (NYSE:DVN) and EQT (NYSE:EQT) are both oils/energy companies, but which is the superior stock? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, earnings, valuation, dividends, institutional ownership, profitability and risk.

Volatility & Risk

Devon Energy has a beta of 3.46, meaning that its share price is 246% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, EQT has a beta of 1.26, meaning that its share price is 26% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Profitability

This table compares Devon Energy and EQT's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a summary of recent ratings and price targets for Devon Energy and EQT, as provided by MarketBeat.

Devon Energy presently has a consensus price target of $18.2143, suggesting a potential downside of 28.88%. EQT has a consensus price target of $17.3529, suggesting a potential downside of 3.49%. Given EQT's higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe EQT is more favorable than Devon Energy.

Valuation and Earnings

This table compares Devon Energy and EQT's revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

Devon Energy has higher revenue and earnings than EQT. Devon Energy is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than EQT, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Insider & Institutional Ownership

80.9% of Devon Energy shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 93.8% of EQT shares are held by institutional investors. 0.6% of Devon Energy shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.6% of EQT shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Summary

Devon Energy beats EQT on 11 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

Diamondback Energy (NASDAQ:FANG) and EQT (NYSE:EQT) are both oils/energy companies, but which is the better stock? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, earnings, institutional ownership, dividends, risk, profitability and valuation.

Risk and Volatility

Diamondback Energy has a beta of 2.59, meaning that its stock price is 159% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, EQT has a beta of 1.26, meaning that its stock price is 26% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Profitability

This table compares Diamondback Energy and EQT's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Analyst Ratings

This is a breakdown of recent ratings and recommmendations for Diamondback Energy and EQT, as provided by MarketBeat.com.

Diamondback Energy currently has a consensus price target of $66.0893, suggesting a potential downside of 22.49%. EQT has a consensus price target of $17.3529, suggesting a potential downside of 3.49%. Given EQT's higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe EQT is more favorable than Diamondback Energy.

Valuation & Earnings

This table compares Diamondback Energy and EQT's revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

Diamondback Energy has higher earnings, but lower revenue than EQT. Diamondback Energy is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than EQT, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Insider and Institutional Ownership

92.1% of Diamondback Energy shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 93.8% of EQT shares are held by institutional investors. 0.5% of Diamondback Energy shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.6% of EQT shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Summary

Diamondback Energy beats EQT on 9 of the 15 factors compared between the two stocks.

Continental Resources (NYSE:CLR) and EQT (NYSE:EQT) are both oils/energy companies, but which is the better stock? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, earnings, institutional ownership, dividends, risk, profitability and valuation.

Risk and Volatility

Continental Resources has a beta of 3.37, meaning that its stock price is 237% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, EQT has a beta of 1.26, meaning that its stock price is 26% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Profitability

This table compares Continental Resources and EQT's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Analyst Ratings

This is a breakdown of recent ratings and recommmendations for Continental Resources and EQT, as provided by MarketBeat.com.

Continental Resources currently has a consensus price target of $17.4250, suggesting a potential downside of 45.10%. EQT has a consensus price target of $17.3529, suggesting a potential downside of 3.49%. Given EQT's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe EQT is more favorable than Continental Resources.

Valuation & Earnings

This table compares Continental Resources and EQT's revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

Continental Resources has higher revenue and earnings than EQT. Continental Resources is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than EQT, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Insider and Institutional Ownership

14.8% of Continental Resources shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 93.8% of EQT shares are held by institutional investors. 79.6% of Continental Resources shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.6% of EQT shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.