Vermilion Energy (VET) Competitors

In the previous week, Diamondback Energy had 55 more articles in the media than Vermilion Energy. MarketBeat recorded 56 mentions for Diamondback Energy and 1 mentions for Vermilion Energy. Vermilion Energy's average media sentiment score of 1.56 beat Diamondback Energy's score of 0.89 indicating that Vermilion Energy is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Diamondback Energy pays an annual dividend of $4.40 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.3%. Vermilion Energy pays an annual dividend of $0.39 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.4%. Diamondback Energy pays out 511.6% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Vermilion Energy pays out -10.2% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Diamondback Energy has raised its dividend for 7 consecutive years and Vermilion Energy has raised its dividend for 3 consecutive years. Vermilion Energy is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

Diamondback Energy has higher revenue and earnings than Vermilion Energy. Vermilion Energy is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Diamondback Energy, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Diamondback Energy currently has a consensus target price of $223.26, suggesting a potential upside of 15.91%. Vermilion Energy has a consensus target price of $15.00, suggesting a potential upside of 32.10%. Given Vermilion Energy's higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Vermilion Energy is more favorable than Diamondback Energy.

90.0% of Diamondback Energy shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 31.9% of Vermilion Energy shares are held by institutional investors. 0.6% of Diamondback Energy shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 2.6% of Vermilion Energy shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Diamondback Energy has a beta of 0.42, suggesting that its share price is 58% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Vermilion Energy has a beta of 0.29, suggesting that its share price is 71% less volatile than the broader market.

Diamondback Energy has a net margin of 1.87% compared to Vermilion Energy's net margin of -43.49%. Diamondback Energy's return on equity of 7.76% beat Vermilion Energy's return on equity.

Vermilion Energy pays an annual dividend of $0.39 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.4%. Baytex Energy pays an annual dividend of $0.06 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.3%. Vermilion Energy pays out -10.2% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Baytex Energy pays out -8.6% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Vermilion Energy has raised its dividend for 3 consecutive years. Vermilion Energy is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

Baytex Energy has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Vermilion Energy. Baytex Energy is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Vermilion Energy, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Baytex Energy has a net margin of -24.25% compared to Vermilion Energy's net margin of -43.49%. Vermilion Energy's return on equity of -2.40% beat Baytex Energy's return on equity.

Vermilion Energy has a beta of 0.29, indicating that its stock price is 71% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Baytex Energy has a beta of 0.37, indicating that its stock price is 63% less volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, Vermilion Energy and Vermilion Energy both had 1 articles in the media. Vermilion Energy's average media sentiment score of 1.56 beat Baytex Energy's score of 0.63 indicating that Vermilion Energy is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Vermilion Energy currently has a consensus target price of $15.00, indicating a potential upside of 32.10%. Given Vermilion Energy's higher possible upside, equities research analysts plainly believe Vermilion Energy is more favorable than Baytex Energy.

31.9% of Vermilion Energy shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 46.2% of Baytex Energy shares are held by institutional investors. 2.6% of Vermilion Energy shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 0.8% of Baytex Energy shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

In the previous week, Canadian Natural Resources had 7 more articles in the media than Vermilion Energy. MarketBeat recorded 8 mentions for Canadian Natural Resources and 1 mentions for Vermilion Energy. Vermilion Energy's average media sentiment score of 1.56 beat Canadian Natural Resources' score of 1.45 indicating that Vermilion Energy is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Canadian Natural Resources pays an annual dividend of $1.81 per share and has a dividend yield of 4.0%. Vermilion Energy pays an annual dividend of $0.39 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.4%. Canadian Natural Resources pays out 54.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Vermilion Energy pays out -10.2% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Canadian Natural Resources has raised its dividend for 24 consecutive years and Vermilion Energy has raised its dividend for 3 consecutive years. Canadian Natural Resources is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

Canadian Natural Resources has a beta of 0.45, suggesting that its stock price is 55% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Vermilion Energy has a beta of 0.29, suggesting that its stock price is 71% less volatile than the broader market.

Canadian Natural Resources has higher revenue and earnings than Vermilion Energy. Vermilion Energy is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Canadian Natural Resources, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Canadian Natural Resources presently has a consensus price target of $57.00, suggesting a potential upside of 24.61%. Vermilion Energy has a consensus price target of $15.00, suggesting a potential upside of 32.10%. Given Vermilion Energy's higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Vermilion Energy is more favorable than Canadian Natural Resources.

Canadian Natural Resources has a net margin of 22.04% compared to Vermilion Energy's net margin of -43.49%. Canadian Natural Resources' return on equity of 17.49% beat Vermilion Energy's return on equity.

74.0% of Canadian Natural Resources shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 31.9% of Vermilion Energy shares are owned by institutional investors. 5.0% of Canadian Natural Resources shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 2.6% of Vermilion Energy shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

In the previous week, Cenovus Energy had 3 more articles in the media than Vermilion Energy. MarketBeat recorded 4 mentions for Cenovus Energy and 1 mentions for Vermilion Energy. Vermilion Energy's average media sentiment score of 1.56 beat Cenovus Energy's score of 0.84 indicating that Vermilion Energy is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Vermilion Energy has a beta of 0.29, meaning that its share price is 71% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Cenovus Energy has a beta of 0.34, meaning that its share price is 66% less volatile than the broader market.

Vermilion Energy presently has a consensus target price of $15.00, suggesting a potential upside of 32.10%. Cenovus Energy has a consensus target price of $35.25, suggesting a potential upside of 24.79%. Given Vermilion Energy's higher possible upside, research analysts clearly believe Vermilion Energy is more favorable than Cenovus Energy.

Cenovus Energy has higher revenue and earnings than Vermilion Energy. Vermilion Energy is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Cenovus Energy, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Vermilion Energy pays an annual dividend of $0.39 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.4%. Cenovus Energy pays an annual dividend of $0.59 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.1%. Vermilion Energy pays out -10.2% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Cenovus Energy pays out 32.4% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Vermilion Energy has increased its dividend for 3 consecutive years and Cenovus Energy has increased its dividend for 4 consecutive years. Vermilion Energy is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

31.9% of Vermilion Energy shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 51.2% of Cenovus Energy shares are owned by institutional investors. 2.6% of Vermilion Energy shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Cenovus Energy has a net margin of 9.53% compared to Vermilion Energy's net margin of -43.49%. Cenovus Energy's return on equity of 15.29% beat Vermilion Energy's return on equity.