Five9 Competitors

Five9 (NASDAQ:FIVN) and Bilibili (NASDAQ:BILI) are both large-cap computer and technology companies, but which is the better business? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their risk, institutional ownership, earnings, dividends, valuation, analyst recommendations and profitability.

Valuation and Earnings

This table compares Five9 and Bilibili's gross revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

Five9 has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Bilibili. Bilibili is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Five9, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Risk and Volatility

Five9 has a beta of 0.53, meaning that its share price is 47% less volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Bilibili has a beta of 1.42, meaning that its share price is 42% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Profitability

This table compares Five9 and Bilibili's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Analyst Ratings

This is a breakdown of current ratings and recommmendations for Five9 and Bilibili, as reported by MarketBeat.com.

Five9 presently has a consensus target price of $187.5625, suggesting a potential upside of 1.25%. Bilibili has a consensus target price of $45.7727, suggesting a potential downside of 63.66%. Given Five9's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, research analysts plainly believe Five9 is more favorable than Bilibili.

Insider and Institutional Ownership

97.9% of Five9 shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 39.1% of Bilibili shares are owned by institutional investors. 3.0% of Five9 shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Summary

Five9 beats Bilibili on 10 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

Five9 (NASDAQ:FIVN) and RingCentral (NYSE:RNG) are both large-cap computer and technology companies, but which is the superior investment? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their profitability, analyst recommendations, risk, institutional ownership, dividends, valuation and earnings.

Institutional and Insider Ownership

97.9% of Five9 shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 86.3% of RingCentral shares are held by institutional investors. 3.0% of Five9 shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 11.0% of RingCentral shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Profitability

This table compares Five9 and RingCentral's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Earnings & Valuation

This table compares Five9 and RingCentral's top-line revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

Five9 has higher earnings, but lower revenue than RingCentral. RingCentral is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Five9, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a breakdown of current ratings and price targets for Five9 and RingCentral, as reported by MarketBeat.com.

Five9 presently has a consensus price target of $187.5625, indicating a potential upside of 1.25%. RingCentral has a consensus price target of $430.3913, indicating a potential upside of 13.81%. Given RingCentral's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe RingCentral is more favorable than Five9.

Risk & Volatility

Five9 has a beta of 0.53, suggesting that its share price is 47% less volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, RingCentral has a beta of 0.7, suggesting that its share price is 30% less volatile than the S&P 500.

Summary

RingCentral beats Five9 on 9 of the 15 factors compared between the two stocks.

Verisk Analytics (NASDAQ:VRSK) and Five9 (NASDAQ:FIVN) are both large-cap business services companies, but which is the better stock? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their valuation, profitability, earnings, risk, analyst recommendations, institutional ownership and dividends.

Profitability

This table compares Verisk Analytics and Five9's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Risk and Volatility

Verisk Analytics has a beta of 0.67, indicating that its stock price is 33% less volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Five9 has a beta of 0.53, indicating that its stock price is 47% less volatile than the S&P 500.

Institutional and Insider Ownership

88.2% of Verisk Analytics shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 97.9% of Five9 shares are owned by institutional investors. 2.6% of Verisk Analytics shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 3.0% of Five9 shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Earnings and Valuation

This table compares Verisk Analytics and Five9's revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

Verisk Analytics has higher revenue and earnings than Five9. Verisk Analytics is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Five9, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Analyst Ratings

This is a summary of current ratings and target prices for Verisk Analytics and Five9, as reported by MarketBeat.com.

Verisk Analytics presently has a consensus price target of $189.6364, indicating a potential upside of 15.74%. Five9 has a consensus price target of $187.5625, indicating a potential upside of 1.25%. Given Verisk Analytics' higher probable upside, research analysts clearly believe Verisk Analytics is more favorable than Five9.

Summary

Verisk Analytics beats Five9 on 9 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

Five9 (NASDAQ:FIVN) and StoneCo (NASDAQ:STNE) are both large-cap computer and technology companies, but which is the better stock? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their risk, analyst recommendations, dividends, institutional ownership, earnings, valuation and profitability.

Insider & Institutional Ownership

97.9% of Five9 shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 61.5% of StoneCo shares are held by institutional investors. 3.0% of Five9 shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Valuation & Earnings

This table compares Five9 and StoneCo's top-line revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

StoneCo has higher revenue and earnings than Five9. StoneCo is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Five9, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Risk & Volatility

Five9 has a beta of 0.53, indicating that its share price is 47% less volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, StoneCo has a beta of 2.4, indicating that its share price is 140% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Profitability

This table compares Five9 and StoneCo's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Analyst Ratings

This is a breakdown of recent ratings for Five9 and StoneCo, as provided by MarketBeat.com.

Five9 presently has a consensus target price of $187.5625, suggesting a potential upside of 1.25%. StoneCo has a consensus target price of $56.4545, suggesting a potential downside of 34.21%. Given Five9's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, research analysts plainly believe Five9 is more favorable than StoneCo.

Summary

StoneCo beats Five9 on 9 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

Five9 (NASDAQ:FIVN) and PagSeguro Digital (NYSE:PAGS) are both large-cap computer and technology companies, but which is the superior stock? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their dividends, valuation, risk, profitability, analyst recommendations, earnings and institutional ownership.

Volatility & Risk

Five9 has a beta of 0.53, indicating that its share price is 47% less volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, PagSeguro Digital has a beta of 1.64, indicating that its share price is 64% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Profitability

This table compares Five9 and PagSeguro Digital's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Insider and Institutional Ownership

97.9% of Five9 shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 58.5% of PagSeguro Digital shares are owned by institutional investors. 3.0% of Five9 shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Valuation & Earnings

This table compares Five9 and PagSeguro Digital's revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

PagSeguro Digital has higher revenue and earnings than Five9. PagSeguro Digital is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Five9, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a summary of recent recommendations for Five9 and PagSeguro Digital, as reported by MarketBeat.

Five9 presently has a consensus price target of $187.5625, suggesting a potential upside of 1.25%. PagSeguro Digital has a consensus price target of $56.6667, suggesting a potential downside of 2.40%. Given Five9's higher probable upside, equities analysts plainly believe Five9 is more favorable than PagSeguro Digital.

Summary

PagSeguro Digital beats Five9 on 9 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

Clarivate (NYSE:CCC) and Five9 (NASDAQ:FIVN) are both large-cap computer and technology companies, but which is the better investment? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their profitability, institutional ownership, analyst recommendations, risk, valuation, earnings and dividends.

Earnings & Valuation

This table compares Clarivate and Five9's gross revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

Five9 has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Clarivate. Clarivate is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Five9, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Volatility & Risk

Clarivate has a beta of 0.53, suggesting that its stock price is 47% less volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Five9 has a beta of 0.53, suggesting that its stock price is 47% less volatile than the S&P 500.

Analyst Ratings

This is a breakdown of current ratings and recommmendations for Clarivate and Five9, as provided by MarketBeat.com.

Clarivate presently has a consensus target price of $33.6667, indicating a potential upside of 16.33%. Five9 has a consensus target price of $187.5625, indicating a potential upside of 1.25%. Given Clarivate's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Clarivate is more favorable than Five9.

Institutional & Insider Ownership

42.8% of Clarivate shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 97.9% of Five9 shares are held by institutional investors. 2.3% of Clarivate shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 3.0% of Five9 shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Profitability

This table compares Clarivate and Five9's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Summary

Clarivate beats Five9 on 7 of the 13 factors compared between the two stocks.