Go Pro

Elastic (ESTC) Competitors

Elastic logo
$85.07 -0.04 (-0.05%)
Closing price 09/15/2026 03:59 PM Eastern
Extended Trading
$85.57 +0.50 (+0.59%)
As of 09/15/2026 07:59 PM Eastern
Extended trading is trading that happens on electronic markets outside of regular trading hours. This is a fair market value extended hours price provided by Massive. Learn more.

ESTC vs. NOW, OKTA, ZM, IOT, and FICO

Should you buy Elastic stock or one of its competitors? Elastic's main competitors and comparable companies include ServiceNow (NOW), Okta (OKTA), Zoom Communications (ZM), Samsara (IOT), and Fair Isaac (FICO). Companies are selected based on similarities in market, industry, and size. These companies are all part of the "software" industry.

How does Elastic compare to ServiceNow?

Elastic (NYSE:ESTC) and ServiceNow (NYSE:NOW) are both technology companies, but which is the better stock? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their earnings, risk, institutional ownership, media sentiment, profitability, dividends, analyst recommendations and valuation.

Elastic currently has a consensus target price of $96.52, suggesting a potential upside of 13.46%. ServiceNow has a consensus target price of $145.71, suggesting a potential upside of 2.58%. Given Elastic's higher probable upside, equities research analysts clearly believe Elastic is more favorable than ServiceNow.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Elastic
0 Sell rating(s)
13 Hold rating(s)
15 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.59
ServiceNow
2 Sell rating(s)
3 Hold rating(s)
36 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.86

Elastic has a net margin of 20.84% compared to ServiceNow's net margin of 11.34%. ServiceNow's return on equity of 16.45% beat Elastic's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Elastic20.84% -0.35% -0.14%
ServiceNow 11.34%16.45%7.68%

97.0% of Elastic shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 87.2% of ServiceNow shares are owned by institutional investors. 12.7% of Elastic shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 0.3% of ServiceNow shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

ServiceNow has higher revenue and earnings than Elastic. Elastic is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than ServiceNow, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Elastic$1.74B5.13$367.77M$3.5723.83
ServiceNow$14.73B9.97$1.75B$1.6088.78

In the previous week, ServiceNow had 10 more articles in the media than Elastic. MarketBeat recorded 49 mentions for ServiceNow and 39 mentions for Elastic. ServiceNow's average media sentiment score of 0.84 beat Elastic's score of 0.36 indicating that ServiceNow is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Elastic
16 Very Positive mention(s)
2 Positive mention(s)
10 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral
ServiceNow
27 Very Positive mention(s)
6 Positive mention(s)
11 Neutral mention(s)
2 Negative mention(s)
2 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

Elastic has a beta of 1.03, meaning that its stock price is 3% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, ServiceNow has a beta of 0.97, meaning that its stock price is 3% less volatile than the broader market.

Summary

ServiceNow beats Elastic on 10 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Elastic compare to Okta?

Elastic (NYSE:ESTC) and Okta (NASDAQ:OKTA) are both technology companies, but which is the superior stock? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their earnings, analyst recommendations, media sentiment, institutional ownership, risk, valuation, profitability and dividends.

In the previous week, Elastic had 10 more articles in the media than Okta. MarketBeat recorded 39 mentions for Elastic and 29 mentions for Okta. Okta's average media sentiment score of 0.49 beat Elastic's score of 0.36 indicating that Okta is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Elastic
16 Very Positive mention(s)
2 Positive mention(s)
10 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral
Okta
15 Very Positive mention(s)
3 Positive mention(s)
8 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
1 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral

Elastic has a beta of 1.03, meaning that its share price is 3% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Okta has a beta of 0.79, meaning that its share price is 21% less volatile than the broader market.

Elastic presently has a consensus price target of $96.52, indicating a potential upside of 13.46%. Okta has a consensus price target of $173.45, indicating a potential downside of 8.93%. Given Elastic's higher possible upside, equities analysts plainly believe Elastic is more favorable than Okta.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Elastic
0 Sell rating(s)
13 Hold rating(s)
15 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.59
Okta
0 Sell rating(s)
10 Hold rating(s)
32 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.79

Elastic has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Okta. Elastic is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Okta, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Elastic$1.74B5.13$367.77M$3.5723.83
Okta$2.92B11.41$235M$1.66114.73

97.0% of Elastic shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 86.6% of Okta shares are owned by institutional investors. 12.7% of Elastic shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 4.6% of Okta shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Elastic has a net margin of 20.84% compared to Okta's net margin of 9.63%. Okta's return on equity of 4.50% beat Elastic's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Elastic20.84% -0.35% -0.14%
Okta 9.63%4.50%3.34%

Summary

Elastic and Okta tied by winning 8 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Elastic compare to Zoom Communications?

Elastic (NYSE:ESTC) and Zoom Communications (NASDAQ:ZM) are both technology companies, but which is the superior stock? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their institutional ownership, valuation, risk, media sentiment, profitability, dividends, earnings and analyst recommendations.

Elastic has a beta of 1.03, meaning that its share price is 3% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Zoom Communications has a beta of 1.04, meaning that its share price is 4% more volatile than the broader market.

Zoom Communications has higher revenue and earnings than Elastic. Zoom Communications is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Elastic, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Elastic$1.74B5.13$367.77M$3.5723.83
Zoom Communications$4.87B5.58$1.90B$10.808.62

Zoom Communications has a net margin of 65.19% compared to Elastic's net margin of 20.84%. Zoom Communications' return on equity of 10.86% beat Elastic's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Elastic20.84% -0.35% -0.14%
Zoom Communications 65.19%10.86%8.93%

In the previous week, Elastic had 13 more articles in the media than Zoom Communications. MarketBeat recorded 39 mentions for Elastic and 26 mentions for Zoom Communications. Zoom Communications' average media sentiment score of 1.04 beat Elastic's score of 0.36 indicating that Zoom Communications is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Elastic
16 Very Positive mention(s)
2 Positive mention(s)
10 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral
Zoom Communications
16 Very Positive mention(s)
2 Positive mention(s)
5 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

97.0% of Elastic shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 66.5% of Zoom Communications shares are owned by institutional investors. 12.7% of Elastic shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 8.8% of Zoom Communications shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Elastic currently has a consensus target price of $96.52, suggesting a potential upside of 13.46%. Zoom Communications has a consensus target price of $112.55, suggesting a potential upside of 20.93%. Given Zoom Communications' higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Zoom Communications is more favorable than Elastic.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Elastic
0 Sell rating(s)
13 Hold rating(s)
15 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.59
Zoom Communications
0 Sell rating(s)
12 Hold rating(s)
15 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.56

Summary

Zoom Communications beats Elastic on 10 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Elastic compare to Samsara?

Elastic (NYSE:ESTC) and Samsara (NYSE:IOT) are both technology companies, but which is the superior investment? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their profitability, risk, dividends, valuation, media sentiment, analyst recommendations, earnings and institutional ownership.

Elastic has higher revenue and earnings than Samsara. Elastic is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Samsara, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Elastic$1.74B5.13$367.77M$3.5723.83
Samsara$1.62B14.98-$9.12M$0.16260.14

Elastic has a beta of 1.03, indicating that its share price is 3% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Samsara has a beta of 1.35, indicating that its share price is 35% more volatile than the broader market.

Elastic presently has a consensus price target of $96.52, suggesting a potential upside of 13.46%. Samsara has a consensus price target of $52.05, suggesting a potential upside of 25.06%. Given Samsara's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Samsara is more favorable than Elastic.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Elastic
0 Sell rating(s)
13 Hold rating(s)
15 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.59
Samsara
1 Sell rating(s)
5 Hold rating(s)
16 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.68

In the previous week, Elastic had 24 more articles in the media than Samsara. MarketBeat recorded 39 mentions for Elastic and 15 mentions for Samsara. Samsara's average media sentiment score of 0.40 beat Elastic's score of 0.36 indicating that Samsara is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Elastic
16 Very Positive mention(s)
2 Positive mention(s)
10 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral
Samsara
7 Very Positive mention(s)
3 Positive mention(s)
3 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral

Elastic has a net margin of 20.84% compared to Samsara's net margin of 4.90%. Samsara's return on equity of 4.13% beat Elastic's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Elastic20.84% -0.35% -0.14%
Samsara 4.90%4.13%2.35%

97.0% of Elastic shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 96.0% of Samsara shares are held by institutional investors. 12.7% of Elastic shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 35.1% of Samsara shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Summary

Samsara beats Elastic on 10 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Elastic compare to Fair Isaac?

Fair Isaac (NYSE:FICO) and Elastic (NYSE:ESTC) are both technology companies, but which is the superior investment? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, valuation, profitability, dividends, institutional ownership, media sentiment, risk and earnings.

Fair Isaac has a net margin of 34.05% compared to Elastic's net margin of 20.84%. Elastic's return on equity of -0.35% beat Fair Isaac's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Fair Isaac34.05% -32.51% 40.61%
Elastic 20.84%-0.35%-0.14%

Fair Isaac has a beta of 1.32, meaning that its stock price is 32% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Elastic has a beta of 1.03, meaning that its stock price is 3% more volatile than the broader market.

85.8% of Fair Isaac shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 97.0% of Elastic shares are held by institutional investors. 3.0% of Fair Isaac shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 12.7% of Elastic shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Fair Isaac presently has a consensus target price of $1,553.69, suggesting a potential upside of 57.75%. Elastic has a consensus target price of $96.52, suggesting a potential upside of 13.46%. Given Fair Isaac's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, equities analysts clearly believe Fair Isaac is more favorable than Elastic.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Fair Isaac
0 Sell rating(s)
5 Hold rating(s)
11 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.69
Elastic
0 Sell rating(s)
13 Hold rating(s)
15 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.59

Fair Isaac has higher revenue and earnings than Elastic. Elastic is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Fair Isaac, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Fair Isaac$1.99B10.69$651.95M$34.6228.45
Elastic$1.74B5.13$367.77M$3.5723.83

In the previous week, Elastic had 23 more articles in the media than Fair Isaac. MarketBeat recorded 39 mentions for Elastic and 16 mentions for Fair Isaac. Fair Isaac's average media sentiment score of 0.90 beat Elastic's score of 0.36 indicating that Fair Isaac is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Fair Isaac
9 Very Positive mention(s)
2 Positive mention(s)
4 Neutral mention(s)
1 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
Elastic
16 Very Positive mention(s)
2 Positive mention(s)
10 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral

Summary

Fair Isaac beats Elastic on 11 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Elastic News Delivered to You Automatically

Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for ESTC and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.

Subscribe Now
SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding ESTC and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.
Skip Chart

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of NYSE and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Skip Chart

ESTC vs. The Competition

MetricElasticSoftware IndustryTechnology SectorNYSE Exchange
Market Cap$8.94B$15.94B$29.46B$23.25B
Dividend YieldN/A3.43%2.75%3.58%
P/E Ratio23.83141.1276.2328.40
Price / Sales5.131,286.92589.3820.30
Price / Cash100.7846.6547.4834.34
Price / Book6.898.657.674.69
Net Income$367.77M$435.49M$705.00M$1.07B
7 Day Performance-1.51%0.08%-1.02%-1.48%
1 Month Performance-1.53%-1.31%-4.79%-4.27%
1 Year Performance-1.79%-0.72%176.45%8.97%

Elastic Competitors List

CompanyMarketRankShare PriceAnalysts' Price Target1Y Price PerformanceMarket CapRevenueP/E RatioEmployee CountIndicator(s)
ESTC
Elastic
4.6614 of 5 stars
$85.07
-0.1%
$96.52
+13.5%
-3.7%$8.94B$1.74B23.834,019
NOW
ServiceNow
2.8583 of 5 stars
$131.19
+0.1%
$144.73
+10.3%
-25.1%$135.57B$13.28B81.9929,187
OKTA
Okta
2.8035 of 5 stars
$171.11
-0.9%
$172.92
+1.1%
+109.5%$30.20B$2.92B103.086,366
ZM
Zoom Communications
4.5283 of 5 stars
$95.46
-0.7%
$112.55
+17.9%
+10.0%$28.06B$4.87B8.847,438
IOT
Samsara
4.0334 of 5 stars
$38.45
-0.5%
$52.44
+36.4%
+5.5%$22.52B$1.62B240.294,100

Related Companies and Tools


This page (NYSE:ESTC) was last updated on 9/16/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.
From Our Partners