Corning (GLW) Competitors

In the previous week, Applied Materials had 13 more articles in the media than Corning. MarketBeat recorded 48 mentions for Applied Materials and 35 mentions for Corning. Applied Materials' average media sentiment score of 0.85 beat Corning's score of 0.67 indicating that Applied Materials is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Applied Materials pays an annual dividend of $2.12 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.5%. Corning pays an annual dividend of $1.12 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.8%. Applied Materials pays out 18.3% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Corning pays out 51.1% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Applied Materials has increased its dividend for 8 consecutive years.

Applied Materials has higher revenue and earnings than Corning. Applied Materials is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Corning, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Applied Materials has a beta of 1.6, meaning that its share price is 60% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Corning has a beta of 1.16, meaning that its share price is 16% more volatile than the broader market.

Applied Materials has a net margin of 30.05% compared to Corning's net margin of 11.20%. Applied Materials' return on equity of 38.02% beat Corning's return on equity.

Applied Materials currently has a consensus price target of $658.45, indicating a potential upside of 58.52%. Corning has a consensus price target of $176.50, indicating a potential upside of 22.37%. Given Applied Materials' stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, equities research analysts clearly believe Applied Materials is more favorable than Corning.

80.6% of Applied Materials shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 69.8% of Corning shares are held by institutional investors. 0.3% of Applied Materials shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 0.3% of Corning shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Corning has a net margin of 11.20% compared to Flex's net margin of 3.32%. Flex's return on equity of 23.15% beat Corning's return on equity.

Flex has a beta of 1.67, indicating that its stock price is 67% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Corning has a beta of 1.16, indicating that its stock price is 16% more volatile than the broader market.

94.3% of Flex shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 69.8% of Corning shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.6% of Flex shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 0.3% of Corning shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

In the previous week, Corning had 5 more articles in the media than Flex. MarketBeat recorded 35 mentions for Corning and 30 mentions for Flex. Corning's average media sentiment score of 0.67 beat Flex's score of 0.61 indicating that Corning is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Corning has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Flex. Flex is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Corning, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Flex currently has a consensus target price of $114.20, indicating a potential upside of 5.84%. Corning has a consensus target price of $176.50, indicating a potential upside of 22.37%. Given Corning's higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Corning is more favorable than Flex.

Corning currently has a consensus price target of $176.50, suggesting a potential upside of 22.37%. Lumentum has a consensus price target of $1,053.83, suggesting a potential upside of 14.62%. Given Corning's higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Corning is more favorable than Lumentum.

In the previous week, Corning had 1 more articles in the media than Lumentum. MarketBeat recorded 35 mentions for Corning and 34 mentions for Lumentum. Corning's average media sentiment score of 0.67 beat Lumentum's score of 0.62 indicating that Corning is being referred to more favorably in the media.

69.8% of Corning shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 94.1% of Lumentum shares are held by institutional investors. 0.3% of Corning shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 0.4% of Lumentum shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Corning has a beta of 1.16, meaning that its stock price is 16% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Lumentum has a beta of 1.53, meaning that its stock price is 53% more volatile than the broader market.

Corning has higher revenue and earnings than Lumentum. Lumentum is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Corning, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Corning has a net margin of 11.20% compared to Lumentum's net margin of -230.15%. Lumentum's return on equity of 26.34% beat Corning's return on equity.

Lam Research has a beta of 1.85, suggesting that its share price is 85% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Corning has a beta of 1.16, suggesting that its share price is 16% more volatile than the broader market.

Lam Research pays an annual dividend of $1.04 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.4%. Corning pays an annual dividend of $1.12 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.8%. Lam Research pays out 18.1% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Corning pays out 51.1% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Lam Research has increased its dividend for 10 consecutive years.

Lam Research has higher revenue and earnings than Corning. Lam Research is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Corning, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

In the previous week, Corning had 1 more articles in the media than Lam Research. MarketBeat recorded 35 mentions for Corning and 34 mentions for Lam Research. Lam Research's average media sentiment score of 0.83 beat Corning's score of 0.67 indicating that Lam Research is being referred to more favorably in the media.

84.6% of Lam Research shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 69.8% of Corning shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.3% of Lam Research shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.3% of Corning shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Lam Research has a net margin of 31.27% compared to Corning's net margin of 11.20%. Lam Research's return on equity of 67.60% beat Corning's return on equity.

Lam Research currently has a consensus price target of $361.81, indicating a potential upside of 34.39%. Corning has a consensus price target of $176.50, indicating a potential upside of 22.37%. Given Lam Research's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, research analysts plainly believe Lam Research is more favorable than Corning.