Corning (GLW) Competitors

Corning has a net margin of 11.09% compared to Flex's net margin of 3.15%. Flex's return on equity of 22.12% beat Corning's return on equity.

In the previous week, Corning had 22 more articles in the media than Flex. MarketBeat recorded 38 mentions for Corning and 16 mentions for Flex. Corning's average media sentiment score of 1.10 beat Flex's score of 0.65 indicating that Corning is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Flex has a beta of 1.64, suggesting that its stock price is 64% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Corning has a beta of 1.09, suggesting that its stock price is 9% more volatile than the broader market.

Corning has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Flex. Flex is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Corning, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

94.3% of Flex shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 69.8% of Corning shares are held by institutional investors. 0.6% of Flex shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 0.3% of Corning shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Flex presently has a consensus target price of $115.70, suggesting a potential downside of 12.51%. Corning has a consensus target price of $194.69, suggesting a potential upside of 3.59%. Given Corning's higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Corning is more favorable than Flex.

Lumentum currently has a consensus price target of $1,012.67, indicating a potential upside of 24.28%. Corning has a consensus price target of $194.69, indicating a potential upside of 3.59%. Given Lumentum's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Lumentum is more favorable than Corning.

Lumentum has a beta of 1.48, suggesting that its stock price is 48% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Corning has a beta of 1.09, suggesting that its stock price is 9% more volatile than the broader market.

94.1% of Lumentum shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 69.8% of Corning shares are held by institutional investors. 0.4% of Lumentum shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.3% of Corning shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Lumentum has a net margin of 17.61% compared to Corning's net margin of 11.09%. Lumentum's return on equity of 24.81% beat Corning's return on equity.

In the previous week, Corning had 6 more articles in the media than Lumentum. MarketBeat recorded 38 mentions for Corning and 32 mentions for Lumentum. Corning's average media sentiment score of 1.10 beat Lumentum's score of 1.06 indicating that Corning is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Corning has higher revenue and earnings than Lumentum. Corning is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Lumentum, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Corning presently has a consensus target price of $194.69, indicating a potential upside of 3.59%. Lam Research has a consensus target price of $358.67, indicating a potential upside of 3.63%. Given Lam Research's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Lam Research is more favorable than Corning.

69.8% of Corning shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 84.6% of Lam Research shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.3% of Corning shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 0.3% of Lam Research shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Corning has a beta of 1.09, meaning that its stock price is 9% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Lam Research has a beta of 1.8, meaning that its stock price is 80% more volatile than the broader market.

Corning pays an annual dividend of $1.12 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.6%. Lam Research pays an annual dividend of $1.04 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.3%. Corning pays out 53.6% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Lam Research pays out 19.6% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Lam Research has raised its dividend for 10 consecutive years.

Lam Research has a net margin of 30.94% compared to Corning's net margin of 11.09%. Lam Research's return on equity of 66.21% beat Corning's return on equity.

In the previous week, Lam Research had 32 more articles in the media than Corning. MarketBeat recorded 70 mentions for Lam Research and 38 mentions for Corning. Lam Research's average media sentiment score of 1.12 beat Corning's score of 1.10 indicating that Lam Research is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Lam Research has higher revenue and earnings than Corning. Lam Research is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Corning, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Meta Platforms presently has a consensus target price of $835.90, indicating a potential upside of 26.45%. Corning has a consensus target price of $194.69, indicating a potential upside of 3.59%. Given Meta Platforms' stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, equities analysts clearly believe Meta Platforms is more favorable than Corning.

79.9% of Meta Platforms shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 69.8% of Corning shares are held by institutional investors. 13.5% of Meta Platforms shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 0.3% of Corning shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Meta Platforms pays an annual dividend of $2.10 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.3%. Corning pays an annual dividend of $1.12 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.6%. Meta Platforms pays out 7.6% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Corning pays out 53.6% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Meta Platforms has increased its dividend for 1 consecutive years.

In the previous week, Meta Platforms had 175 more articles in the media than Corning. MarketBeat recorded 213 mentions for Meta Platforms and 38 mentions for Corning. Corning's average media sentiment score of 1.10 beat Meta Platforms' score of 0.68 indicating that Corning is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Meta Platforms has a net margin of 32.84% compared to Corning's net margin of 11.09%. Meta Platforms' return on equity of 36.93% beat Corning's return on equity.

Meta Platforms has higher revenue and earnings than Corning. Meta Platforms is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Corning, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Meta Platforms has a beta of 1.25, suggesting that its share price is 25% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Corning has a beta of 1.09, suggesting that its share price is 9% more volatile than the broader market.