Corning (GLW) Competitors

Corning has a beta of 1.14, suggesting that its share price is 14% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Lumentum has a beta of 1.53, suggesting that its share price is 53% more volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, Lumentum had 7 more articles in the media than Corning. MarketBeat recorded 75 mentions for Lumentum and 68 mentions for Corning. Corning's average media sentiment score of 1.00 beat Lumentum's score of 0.83 indicating that Corning is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Corning presently has a consensus target price of $177.92, suggesting a potential downside of 14.49%. Lumentum has a consensus target price of $1,012.43, suggesting a potential upside of 1.06%. Given Lumentum's higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Lumentum is more favorable than Corning.

Corning has higher revenue and earnings than Lumentum. Corning is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Lumentum, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Lumentum has a net margin of 17.61% compared to Corning's net margin of 11.09%. Lumentum's return on equity of 24.81% beat Corning's return on equity.

69.8% of Corning shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 94.1% of Lumentum shares are held by institutional investors. 0.3% of Corning shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 0.4% of Lumentum shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Corning has a beta of 1.14, meaning that its stock price is 14% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Meta Platforms has a beta of 1.25, meaning that its stock price is 25% more volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, Meta Platforms had 93 more articles in the media than Corning. MarketBeat recorded 161 mentions for Meta Platforms and 68 mentions for Corning. Corning's average media sentiment score of 1.00 beat Meta Platforms' score of 0.95 indicating that Corning is being referred to more favorably in the media.

69.8% of Corning shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 79.9% of Meta Platforms shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.3% of Corning shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 13.6% of Meta Platforms shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Meta Platforms has higher revenue and earnings than Corning. Meta Platforms is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Corning, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Corning pays an annual dividend of $1.12 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.5%. Meta Platforms pays an annual dividend of $2.10 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.3%. Corning pays out 53.6% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Meta Platforms pays out 7.6% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Meta Platforms has increased its dividend for 1 consecutive years.

Meta Platforms has a net margin of 32.84% compared to Corning's net margin of 11.09%. Meta Platforms' return on equity of 36.93% beat Corning's return on equity.

Corning presently has a consensus target price of $177.92, suggesting a potential downside of 14.49%. Meta Platforms has a consensus target price of $840.31, suggesting a potential upside of 35.88%. Given Meta Platforms' stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Meta Platforms is more favorable than Corning.

Corning has a beta of 1.14, suggesting that its share price is 14% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Teradyne has a beta of 1.79, suggesting that its share price is 79% more volatile than the broader market.

Corning pays an annual dividend of $1.12 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.5%. Teradyne pays an annual dividend of $0.52 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.1%. Corning pays out 53.6% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Teradyne pays out 9.6% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Teradyne has raised its dividend for 1 consecutive years.

Corning has higher revenue and earnings than Teradyne. Teradyne is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Corning, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

In the previous week, Corning had 34 more articles in the media than Teradyne. MarketBeat recorded 68 mentions for Corning and 34 mentions for Teradyne. Teradyne's average media sentiment score of 1.10 beat Corning's score of 1.00 indicating that Teradyne is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Corning presently has a consensus target price of $177.92, suggesting a potential downside of 14.49%. Teradyne has a consensus target price of $339.80, suggesting a potential downside of 4.70%. Given Teradyne's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Teradyne is more favorable than Corning.

69.8% of Corning shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 99.8% of Teradyne shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.3% of Corning shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 0.2% of Teradyne shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Teradyne has a net margin of 22.55% compared to Corning's net margin of 11.09%. Teradyne's return on equity of 31.79% beat Corning's return on equity.

Amphenol has a net margin of 17.24% compared to Corning's net margin of 11.09%. Amphenol's return on equity of 37.44% beat Corning's return on equity.

Amphenol has a beta of 1.29, indicating that its stock price is 29% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Corning has a beta of 1.14, indicating that its stock price is 14% more volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, Corning had 38 more articles in the media than Amphenol. MarketBeat recorded 68 mentions for Corning and 30 mentions for Amphenol. Amphenol's average media sentiment score of 1.23 beat Corning's score of 1.00 indicating that Amphenol is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Amphenol has higher revenue and earnings than Corning. Amphenol is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Corning, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Amphenol currently has a consensus price target of $176.53, indicating a potential upside of 36.79%. Corning has a consensus price target of $177.92, indicating a potential downside of 14.49%. Given Amphenol's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Amphenol is more favorable than Corning.

97.0% of Amphenol shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 69.8% of Corning shares are held by institutional investors. 1.4% of Amphenol shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 0.3% of Corning shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Amphenol pays an annual dividend of $1.00 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.8%. Corning pays an annual dividend of $1.12 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.5%. Amphenol pays out 28.7% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Corning pays out 53.6% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Amphenol is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.