Corning (GLW) Competitors

Corning pays an annual dividend of $1.12 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.7%. Applied Materials pays an annual dividend of $2.12 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.4%. Corning pays out 51.1% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Applied Materials pays out 18.3% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Applied Materials has increased its dividend for 8 consecutive years.

Corning has a beta of 1.13, indicating that its share price is 13% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Applied Materials has a beta of 1.6, indicating that its share price is 60% more volatile than the broader market.

69.8% of Corning shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 80.6% of Applied Materials shares are held by institutional investors. 0.3% of Corning shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 0.3% of Applied Materials shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

In the previous week, Applied Materials had 18 more articles in the media than Corning. MarketBeat recorded 43 mentions for Applied Materials and 25 mentions for Corning. Applied Materials' average media sentiment score of 0.84 beat Corning's score of 0.57 indicating that Applied Materials is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Applied Materials has a net margin of 30.05% compared to Corning's net margin of 11.20%. Applied Materials' return on equity of 38.02% beat Corning's return on equity.

Applied Materials has higher revenue and earnings than Corning. Applied Materials is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Corning, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Corning currently has a consensus price target of $174.87, indicating a potential upside of 3.43%. Applied Materials has a consensus price target of $640.20, indicating a potential upside of 20.73%. Given Applied Materials' stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Applied Materials is more favorable than Corning.

Corning currently has a consensus target price of $174.87, indicating a potential upside of 3.43%. Flex has a consensus target price of $114.20, indicating a potential downside of 5.92%. Given Corning's higher probable upside, equities research analysts plainly believe Corning is more favorable than Flex.

Corning has a beta of 1.13, suggesting that its share price is 13% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Flex has a beta of 1.67, suggesting that its share price is 67% more volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, Corning had 7 more articles in the media than Flex. MarketBeat recorded 25 mentions for Corning and 18 mentions for Flex. Corning's average media sentiment score of 0.57 beat Flex's score of 0.32 indicating that Corning is being referred to more favorably in the media.

69.8% of Corning shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 94.3% of Flex shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.3% of Corning shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.6% of Flex shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Corning has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Flex. Flex is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Corning, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Corning has a net margin of 11.20% compared to Flex's net margin of 3.32%. Flex's return on equity of 23.15% beat Corning's return on equity.

Lumentum has a beta of 1.53, indicating that its share price is 53% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Corning has a beta of 1.13, indicating that its share price is 13% more volatile than the broader market.

Corning has higher revenue and earnings than Lumentum. Lumentum is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Corning, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

In the previous week, Lumentum had 17 more articles in the media than Corning. MarketBeat recorded 42 mentions for Lumentum and 25 mentions for Corning. Corning's average media sentiment score of 0.57 beat Lumentum's score of 0.48 indicating that Corning is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Lumentum currently has a consensus target price of $1,078.75, indicating a potential downside of 4.82%. Corning has a consensus target price of $174.87, indicating a potential upside of 3.43%. Given Corning's higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Corning is more favorable than Lumentum.

94.1% of Lumentum shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 69.8% of Corning shares are held by institutional investors. 0.4% of Lumentum shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 0.3% of Corning shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Corning has a net margin of 11.20% compared to Lumentum's net margin of -230.15%. Lumentum's return on equity of 26.34% beat Corning's return on equity.

Lam Research has a beta of 1.85, suggesting that its share price is 85% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Corning has a beta of 1.13, suggesting that its share price is 13% more volatile than the broader market.

84.6% of Lam Research shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 69.8% of Corning shares are held by institutional investors. 0.3% of Lam Research shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.3% of Corning shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Lam Research currently has a consensus price target of $364.59, indicating a potential upside of 9.19%. Corning has a consensus price target of $174.87, indicating a potential upside of 3.43%. Given Lam Research's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, research analysts clearly believe Lam Research is more favorable than Corning.

Lam Research has a net margin of 31.27% compared to Corning's net margin of 11.20%. Lam Research's return on equity of 67.60% beat Corning's return on equity.

Lam Research pays an annual dividend of $1.32 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.4%. Corning pays an annual dividend of $1.12 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.7%. Lam Research pays out 22.9% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Corning pays out 51.1% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Lam Research has increased its dividend for 10 consecutive years.

Lam Research has higher revenue and earnings than Corning. Lam Research is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Corning, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

In the previous week, Lam Research had 5 more articles in the media than Corning. MarketBeat recorded 30 mentions for Lam Research and 25 mentions for Corning. Lam Research's average media sentiment score of 0.69 beat Corning's score of 0.57 indicating that Lam Research is being referred to more favorably in the media.