Corning (GLW) Competitors

Corning has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Flex. Flex is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Corning, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Corning presently has a consensus target price of $177.92, indicating a potential downside of 7.27%. Flex has a consensus target price of $115.70, indicating a potential downside of 25.76%. Given Corning's higher probable upside, equities analysts clearly believe Corning is more favorable than Flex.

Corning has a beta of 1.15, meaning that its share price is 15% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Flex has a beta of 1.64, meaning that its share price is 64% more volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, Corning had 10 more articles in the media than Flex. MarketBeat recorded 33 mentions for Corning and 23 mentions for Flex. Flex's average media sentiment score of 1.31 beat Corning's score of 1.21 indicating that Flex is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Corning has a net margin of 11.09% compared to Flex's net margin of 3.15%. Flex's return on equity of 22.12% beat Corning's return on equity.

69.8% of Corning shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 94.3% of Flex shares are held by institutional investors. 0.3% of Corning shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 0.6% of Flex shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

In the previous week, Lumentum had 15 more articles in the media than Corning. MarketBeat recorded 48 mentions for Lumentum and 33 mentions for Corning. Corning's average media sentiment score of 1.21 beat Lumentum's score of 1.09 indicating that Corning is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Lumentum has a net margin of 17.61% compared to Corning's net margin of 11.09%. Lumentum's return on equity of 24.81% beat Corning's return on equity.

Corning has a beta of 1.15, suggesting that its share price is 15% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Lumentum has a beta of 1.47, suggesting that its share price is 47% more volatile than the broader market.

Corning has higher revenue and earnings than Lumentum. Corning is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Lumentum, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

69.8% of Corning shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 94.1% of Lumentum shares are held by institutional investors. 0.3% of Corning shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.4% of Lumentum shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Corning currently has a consensus target price of $177.92, suggesting a potential downside of 7.27%. Lumentum has a consensus target price of $1,021.95, suggesting a potential upside of 13.20%. Given Lumentum's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Lumentum is more favorable than Corning.

Corning has a beta of 1.15, suggesting that its share price is 15% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Meta Platforms has a beta of 1.23, suggesting that its share price is 23% more volatile than the broader market.

Meta Platforms has higher revenue and earnings than Corning. Meta Platforms is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Corning, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Corning pays an annual dividend of $1.12 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.6%. Meta Platforms pays an annual dividend of $2.10 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.3%. Corning pays out 53.6% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Meta Platforms pays out 7.6% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Meta Platforms has raised its dividend for 1 consecutive years.

In the previous week, Meta Platforms had 177 more articles in the media than Corning. MarketBeat recorded 210 mentions for Meta Platforms and 33 mentions for Corning. Corning's average media sentiment score of 1.21 beat Meta Platforms' score of 0.92 indicating that Corning is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Corning currently has a consensus target price of $177.92, suggesting a potential downside of 7.27%. Meta Platforms has a consensus target price of $840.60, suggesting a potential upside of 34.76%. Given Meta Platforms' stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Meta Platforms is more favorable than Corning.

Meta Platforms has a net margin of 32.84% compared to Corning's net margin of 11.09%. Meta Platforms' return on equity of 36.93% beat Corning's return on equity.

69.8% of Corning shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 79.9% of Meta Platforms shares are held by institutional investors. 0.3% of Corning shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 13.5% of Meta Platforms shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Corning pays an annual dividend of $1.12 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.6%. Teradyne pays an annual dividend of $0.52 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.1%. Corning pays out 53.6% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Teradyne pays out 9.6% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Teradyne has increased its dividend for 1 consecutive years.

Teradyne has a net margin of 22.55% compared to Corning's net margin of 11.09%. Teradyne's return on equity of 31.79% beat Corning's return on equity.

Corning has higher revenue and earnings than Teradyne. Teradyne is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Corning, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Corning has a beta of 1.15, suggesting that its share price is 15% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Teradyne has a beta of 1.79, suggesting that its share price is 79% more volatile than the broader market.

Corning currently has a consensus target price of $177.92, suggesting a potential downside of 7.27%. Teradyne has a consensus target price of $339.80, suggesting a potential downside of 17.06%. Given Corning's higher probable upside, equities research analysts plainly believe Corning is more favorable than Teradyne.

69.8% of Corning shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 99.8% of Teradyne shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.3% of Corning shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 0.2% of Teradyne shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

In the previous week, Corning had 10 more articles in the media than Teradyne. MarketBeat recorded 33 mentions for Corning and 23 mentions for Teradyne. Teradyne's average media sentiment score of 1.30 beat Corning's score of 1.21 indicating that Teradyne is being referred to more favorably in the news media.