Corning (GLW) Competitors

Corning currently has a consensus target price of $182.62, suggesting a potential downside of 11.31%. Flex has a consensus target price of $115.70, suggesting a potential downside of 23.17%. Given Corning's higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Corning is more favorable than Flex.

Corning has a beta of 1.15, suggesting that its stock price is 15% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Flex has a beta of 1.64, suggesting that its stock price is 64% more volatile than the broader market.

Corning has a net margin of 11.09% compared to Flex's net margin of 3.15%. Flex's return on equity of 22.12% beat Corning's return on equity.

69.8% of Corning shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 94.3% of Flex shares are held by institutional investors. 0.3% of Corning shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.6% of Flex shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

In the previous week, Flex had 6 more articles in the media than Corning. MarketBeat recorded 50 mentions for Flex and 44 mentions for Corning. Corning's average media sentiment score of 1.30 beat Flex's score of 0.18 indicating that Corning is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Corning has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Flex. Flex is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Corning, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

In the previous week, Corning had 19 more articles in the media than Lumentum. MarketBeat recorded 44 mentions for Corning and 25 mentions for Lumentum. Lumentum's average media sentiment score of 1.36 beat Corning's score of 1.30 indicating that Lumentum is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Corning presently has a consensus price target of $182.62, indicating a potential downside of 11.31%. Lumentum has a consensus price target of $1,021.95, indicating a potential upside of 21.53%. Given Lumentum's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Lumentum is more favorable than Corning.

69.8% of Corning shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 94.1% of Lumentum shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.3% of Corning shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.4% of Lumentum shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Corning has a beta of 1.15, suggesting that its share price is 15% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Lumentum has a beta of 1.47, suggesting that its share price is 47% more volatile than the broader market.

Lumentum has a net margin of 17.61% compared to Corning's net margin of 11.09%. Lumentum's return on equity of 24.81% beat Corning's return on equity.

Corning has higher revenue and earnings than Lumentum. Corning is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Lumentum, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Meta Platforms has a net margin of 32.84% compared to Corning's net margin of 11.09%. Meta Platforms' return on equity of 36.93% beat Corning's return on equity.

Corning pays an annual dividend of $1.12 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.5%. Meta Platforms pays an annual dividend of $2.10 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.4%. Corning pays out 53.6% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Meta Platforms pays out 7.6% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Meta Platforms has increased its dividend for 1 consecutive years.

In the previous week, Meta Platforms had 148 more articles in the media than Corning. MarketBeat recorded 192 mentions for Meta Platforms and 44 mentions for Corning. Corning's average media sentiment score of 1.30 beat Meta Platforms' score of 1.11 indicating that Corning is being referred to more favorably in the media.

69.8% of Corning shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 79.9% of Meta Platforms shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.3% of Corning shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 13.5% of Meta Platforms shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Meta Platforms has higher revenue and earnings than Corning. Meta Platforms is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Corning, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Corning has a beta of 1.15, meaning that its share price is 15% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Meta Platforms has a beta of 1.23, meaning that its share price is 23% more volatile than the broader market.

Corning presently has a consensus price target of $182.62, suggesting a potential downside of 11.31%. Meta Platforms has a consensus price target of $840.60, suggesting a potential upside of 50.69%. Given Meta Platforms' stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Meta Platforms is more favorable than Corning.

99.8% of Teradyne shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 69.8% of Corning shares are held by institutional investors. 0.2% of Teradyne shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.3% of Corning shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Teradyne presently has a consensus target price of $363.87, indicating a potential downside of 14.52%. Corning has a consensus target price of $182.62, indicating a potential downside of 11.31%. Given Corning's higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Corning is more favorable than Teradyne.

Teradyne has a beta of 1.79, meaning that its stock price is 79% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Corning has a beta of 1.15, meaning that its stock price is 15% more volatile than the broader market.

Teradyne has a net margin of 22.55% compared to Corning's net margin of 11.09%. Teradyne's return on equity of 31.79% beat Corning's return on equity.

Teradyne pays an annual dividend of $0.52 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.1%. Corning pays an annual dividend of $1.12 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.5%. Teradyne pays out 9.6% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Corning pays out 53.6% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Teradyne has increased its dividend for 1 consecutive years.

In the previous week, Corning had 10 more articles in the media than Teradyne. MarketBeat recorded 44 mentions for Corning and 34 mentions for Teradyne. Corning's average media sentiment score of 1.30 beat Teradyne's score of 1.07 indicating that Corning is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Corning has higher revenue and earnings than Teradyne. Teradyne is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Corning, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.