Corning (GLW) Competitors

Applied Materials pays an annual dividend of $2.12 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.4%. Corning pays an annual dividend of $1.12 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.7%. Applied Materials pays out 18.3% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Corning pays out 51.1% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Applied Materials has increased its dividend for 8 consecutive years.

Applied Materials currently has a consensus price target of $657.76, indicating a potential upside of 37.10%. Corning has a consensus price target of $174.08, indicating a potential upside of 13.95%. Given Applied Materials' stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, equities analysts plainly believe Applied Materials is more favorable than Corning.

80.6% of Applied Materials shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 69.8% of Corning shares are held by institutional investors. 0.3% of Applied Materials shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 0.3% of Corning shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

In the previous week, Applied Materials had 35 more articles in the media than Corning. MarketBeat recorded 104 mentions for Applied Materials and 69 mentions for Corning. Corning's average media sentiment score of 1.55 beat Applied Materials' score of 1.31 indicating that Corning is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Applied Materials has a net margin of 30.05% compared to Corning's net margin of 11.20%. Applied Materials' return on equity of 38.02% beat Corning's return on equity.

Applied Materials has a beta of 1.61, suggesting that its stock price is 61% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Corning has a beta of 1.14, suggesting that its stock price is 14% more volatile than the broader market.

Applied Materials has higher revenue and earnings than Corning. Applied Materials is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Corning, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Corning has a net margin of 11.20% compared to Flex's net margin of 3.32%. Flex's return on equity of 23.15% beat Corning's return on equity.

Corning presently has a consensus target price of $174.08, suggesting a potential upside of 13.95%. Flex has a consensus target price of $114.20, suggesting a potential upside of 2.13%. Given Corning's higher possible upside, research analysts plainly believe Corning is more favorable than Flex.

Corning has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Flex. Flex is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Corning, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

69.8% of Corning shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 94.3% of Flex shares are held by institutional investors. 0.3% of Corning shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 0.6% of Flex shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Corning has a beta of 1.14, suggesting that its share price is 14% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Flex has a beta of 1.67, suggesting that its share price is 67% more volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, Corning had 59 more articles in the media than Flex. MarketBeat recorded 69 mentions for Corning and 10 mentions for Flex. Corning's average media sentiment score of 1.55 beat Flex's score of 0.63 indicating that Corning is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Corning presently has a consensus price target of $174.08, indicating a potential upside of 13.95%. Lumentum has a consensus price target of $1,044.67, indicating a potential upside of 11.25%. Given Corning's higher possible upside, equities research analysts plainly believe Corning is more favorable than Lumentum.

In the previous week, Lumentum had 12 more articles in the media than Corning. MarketBeat recorded 81 mentions for Lumentum and 69 mentions for Corning. Corning's average media sentiment score of 1.55 beat Lumentum's score of 1.20 indicating that Corning is being referred to more favorably in the media.

69.8% of Corning shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 94.1% of Lumentum shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.3% of Corning shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.4% of Lumentum shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Corning has higher revenue and earnings than Lumentum. Lumentum is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Corning, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Corning has a net margin of 11.20% compared to Lumentum's net margin of -230.15%. Lumentum's return on equity of 26.34% beat Corning's return on equity.

Corning has a beta of 1.14, suggesting that its share price is 14% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Lumentum has a beta of 1.5, suggesting that its share price is 50% more volatile than the broader market.

Corning presently has a consensus target price of $174.08, indicating a potential upside of 13.95%. Lam Research has a consensus target price of $357.31, indicating a potential upside of 14.20%. Given Lam Research's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Lam Research is more favorable than Corning.

69.8% of Corning shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 84.6% of Lam Research shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.3% of Corning shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.3% of Lam Research shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Lam Research has a net margin of 31.27% compared to Corning's net margin of 11.20%. Lam Research's return on equity of 67.60% beat Corning's return on equity.

Corning has a beta of 1.14, meaning that its share price is 14% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Lam Research has a beta of 1.84, meaning that its share price is 84% more volatile than the broader market.

Lam Research has higher revenue and earnings than Corning. Lam Research is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Corning, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

In the previous week, Corning had 13 more articles in the media than Lam Research. MarketBeat recorded 69 mentions for Corning and 56 mentions for Lam Research. Corning's average media sentiment score of 1.55 beat Lam Research's score of 1.34 indicating that Corning is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Corning pays an annual dividend of $1.12 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.7%. Lam Research pays an annual dividend of $1.04 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.3%. Corning pays out 51.1% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Lam Research pays out 18.1% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Lam Research has increased its dividend for 10 consecutive years.