SAP (SAP) Competitors

80.4% of Salesforce shares are owned by institutional investors. 7.4% of SAP shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 3.5% of Salesforce shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Salesforce has a net margin of 21.99% compared to SAP's net margin of 20.87%. Salesforce's return on equity of 24.90% beat SAP's return on equity.

SAP has higher revenue and earnings than Salesforce. Salesforce is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than SAP, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

SAP has a beta of 1.11, indicating that its stock price is 11% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Salesforce has a beta of 1.24, indicating that its stock price is 24% more volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, Salesforce had 38 more articles in the media than SAP. MarketBeat recorded 50 mentions for Salesforce and 12 mentions for SAP. Salesforce's average media sentiment score of 1.03 beat SAP's score of 0.44 indicating that Salesforce is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

SAP pays an annual dividend of $2.14 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.9%. Salesforce pays an annual dividend of $1.76 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.8%. SAP pays out 26.1% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Salesforce pays out 16.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Salesforce has raised its dividend for 1 consecutive years.

SAP currently has a consensus target price of $258.38, suggesting a potential upside of 10.69%. Salesforce has a consensus target price of $278.98, suggesting a potential upside of 29.98%. Given Salesforce's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Salesforce is more favorable than SAP.

In the previous week, Adobe had 54 more articles in the media than SAP. MarketBeat recorded 66 mentions for Adobe and 12 mentions for SAP. Adobe's average media sentiment score of 0.63 beat SAP's score of 0.44 indicating that Adobe is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

SAP has higher revenue and earnings than Adobe. Adobe is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than SAP, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

SAP has a beta of 1.11, meaning that its share price is 11% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Adobe has a beta of 1.37, meaning that its share price is 37% more volatile than the broader market.

81.8% of Adobe shares are owned by institutional investors. 7.4% of SAP shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.2% of Adobe shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Adobe has a net margin of 28.05% compared to SAP's net margin of 20.87%. Adobe's return on equity of 65.65% beat SAP's return on equity.

SAP currently has a consensus target price of $258.38, indicating a potential upside of 10.69%. Adobe has a consensus target price of $282.52, indicating a potential upside of 19.60%. Given Adobe's higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Adobe is more favorable than SAP.

In the previous week, Intuit had 26 more articles in the media than SAP. MarketBeat recorded 38 mentions for Intuit and 12 mentions for SAP. Intuit's average media sentiment score of 1.15 beat SAP's score of 0.44 indicating that Intuit is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

SAP pays an annual dividend of $2.14 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.9%. Intuit pays an annual dividend of $5.52 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.6%. SAP pays out 26.1% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Intuit pays out 33.5% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Intuit has raised its dividend for 13 consecutive years. Intuit is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

SAP has higher revenue and earnings than Intuit. Intuit is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than SAP, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

83.7% of Intuit shares are owned by institutional investors. 7.4% of SAP shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 2.5% of Intuit shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Intuit has a net margin of 21.29% compared to SAP's net margin of 20.87%. Intuit's return on equity of 25.97% beat SAP's return on equity.

SAP has a beta of 1.11, meaning that its share price is 11% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Intuit has a beta of 0.91, meaning that its share price is 9% less volatile than the broader market.

SAP currently has a consensus price target of $258.38, suggesting a potential upside of 10.69%. Intuit has a consensus price target of $431.68, suggesting a potential upside of 28.12%. Given Intuit's higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Intuit is more favorable than SAP.

SAP has a beta of 1.11, indicating that its share price is 11% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Cadence Design Systems has a beta of 1.1, indicating that its share price is 10% more volatile than the broader market.

84.9% of Cadence Design Systems shares are held by institutional investors. 7.4% of SAP shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.5% of Cadence Design Systems shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Cadence Design Systems has a net margin of 22.51% compared to SAP's net margin of 20.87%. Cadence Design Systems' return on equity of 26.56% beat SAP's return on equity.

SAP has higher revenue and earnings than Cadence Design Systems. SAP is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Cadence Design Systems, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

SAP presently has a consensus target price of $258.38, indicating a potential upside of 10.69%. Cadence Design Systems has a consensus target price of $410.05, indicating a potential upside of 23.59%. Given Cadence Design Systems' stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Cadence Design Systems is more favorable than SAP.

In the previous week, Cadence Design Systems had 3 more articles in the media than SAP. MarketBeat recorded 15 mentions for Cadence Design Systems and 12 mentions for SAP. Cadence Design Systems' average media sentiment score of 0.99 beat SAP's score of 0.44 indicating that Cadence Design Systems is being referred to more favorably in the news media.