Which has stronger valuation & earnings, LRCX or ASML?

ASML has higher revenue and earnings than Lam Research. Lam Research is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than ASML, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks. Company Gross Revenue Price/Sales Ratio Net Income Earnings Per Share Price/Earnings Ratio Lam Research $23.23B 14.59 $7.27B $5.76 47.03 ASML $36.95B 16.94 $10.87B $32.14 49.52

Is LRCX or ASML more profitable?

Lam Research has a net margin of 31.27% compared to ASML's net margin of 30.11%. Lam Research's return on equity of 67.60% beat ASML's return on equity. Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets Lam Research 31.27% 67.60% 33.48% ASML 30.11% 52.71% 22.10%

Does the media prefer LRCX or ASML?

In the previous week, ASML had 4 more articles in the media than Lam Research. MarketBeat recorded 47 mentions for ASML and 43 mentions for Lam Research. Lam Research's average media sentiment score of 0.87 beat ASML's score of 0.50 indicating that Lam Research is being referred to more favorably in the media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment Lam Research 24 Very Positive mention(s) 8 Positive mention(s) 5 Neutral mention(s) 3 Negative mention(s) 1 Very Negative mention(s) Positive ASML 18 Very Positive mention(s) 8 Positive mention(s) 6 Neutral mention(s) 11 Negative mention(s) 1 Very Negative mention(s) Neutral

Which has stronger valuation and earnings, AMAT or ASML?

ASML has higher revenue and earnings than Applied Materials. Applied Materials is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than ASML, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks. Company Gross Revenue Price/Sales Ratio Net Income Earnings Per Share Price/Earnings Ratio Applied Materials $30.84B 10.84 $7.00B $11.60 36.31 ASML $36.95B 16.94 $10.87B $32.14 49.52

Is AMAT or ASML more profitable?

ASML has a net margin of 30.11% compared to Applied Materials' net margin of 30.05%. ASML's return on equity of 52.71% beat Applied Materials' return on equity. Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets Applied Materials 30.05% 38.02% 22.09% ASML 30.11% 52.71% 22.10%

Does the media favor AMAT or ASML?

In the previous week, Applied Materials had 3 more articles in the media than ASML. MarketBeat recorded 50 mentions for Applied Materials and 47 mentions for ASML. Applied Materials' average media sentiment score of 0.87 beat ASML's score of 0.50 indicating that Applied Materials is being referred to more favorably in the media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment Applied Materials 27 Very Positive mention(s) 5 Positive mention(s) 11 Neutral mention(s) 4 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive ASML 18 Very Positive mention(s) 8 Positive mention(s) 6 Neutral mention(s) 11 Negative mention(s) 1 Very Negative mention(s) Neutral

Which has higher earnings & valuation, KLAC or ASML?

ASML has higher revenue and earnings than KLA. KLA is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than ASML, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks. Company Gross Revenue Price/Sales Ratio Net Income Earnings Per Share Price/Earnings Ratio KLA $13.58B 16.17 $4.83B $3.67 45.78 ASML $36.95B 16.94 $10.87B $32.14 49.52

Is KLAC or ASML more profitable?

KLA has a net margin of 35.57% compared to ASML's net margin of 30.11%. KLA's return on equity of 87.66% beat ASML's return on equity. Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets KLA 35.57% 87.66% 29.23% ASML 30.11% 52.71% 22.10%

Does the media refer more to KLAC or ASML?

In the previous week, ASML had 21 more articles in the media than KLA. MarketBeat recorded 47 mentions for ASML and 26 mentions for KLA. KLA's average media sentiment score of 1.13 beat ASML's score of 0.50 indicating that KLA is being referred to more favorably in the media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment KLA 17 Very Positive mention(s) 2 Positive mention(s) 4 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 2 Very Negative mention(s) Positive ASML 18 Very Positive mention(s) 8 Positive mention(s) 6 Neutral mention(s) 11 Negative mention(s) 1 Very Negative mention(s) Neutral

Which has preferable earnings & valuation, TER or ASML?

ASML has higher revenue and earnings than Teradyne. Teradyne is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than ASML, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks. Company Gross Revenue Price/Sales Ratio Net Income Earnings Per Share Price/Earnings Ratio Teradyne $3.19B 16.31 $554.05M $7.29 45.66 ASML $36.95B 16.94 $10.87B $32.14 49.52

Is TER or ASML more profitable?

ASML has a net margin of 30.11% compared to Teradyne's net margin of 25.77%. ASML's return on equity of 52.71% beat Teradyne's return on equity. Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets Teradyne 25.77% 39.93% 27.67% ASML 30.11% 52.71% 22.10%

Does the media favor TER or ASML?

In the previous week, ASML had 23 more articles in the media than Teradyne. MarketBeat recorded 47 mentions for ASML and 24 mentions for Teradyne. Teradyne's average media sentiment score of 0.67 beat ASML's score of 0.50 indicating that Teradyne is being referred to more favorably in the media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment Teradyne 10 Very Positive mention(s) 2 Positive mention(s) 9 Neutral mention(s) 1 Negative mention(s) 1 Very Negative mention(s) Positive ASML 18 Very Positive mention(s) 8 Positive mention(s) 6 Neutral mention(s) 11 Negative mention(s) 1 Very Negative mention(s) Neutral

Which has stronger valuation & earnings, Q or ASML?

ASML has higher revenue and earnings than Qnity Electronics. Qnity Electronics is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than ASML, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks. Company Gross Revenue Price/Sales Ratio Net Income Earnings Per Share Price/Earnings Ratio Qnity Electronics $4.75B 5.05 $692M $2.80 40.96 ASML $36.95B 16.94 $10.87B $32.14 49.52

Is Q or ASML more profitable?

ASML has a net margin of 30.11% compared to Qnity Electronics' net margin of 11.25%. ASML's return on equity of 52.71% beat Qnity Electronics' return on equity. Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets Qnity Electronics 11.25% 10.83% 6.26% ASML 30.11% 52.71% 22.10%

Does the media refer more to Q or ASML?

In the previous week, ASML had 41 more articles in the media than Qnity Electronics. MarketBeat recorded 47 mentions for ASML and 6 mentions for Qnity Electronics. Qnity Electronics' average media sentiment score of 0.93 beat ASML's score of 0.50 indicating that Qnity Electronics is being referred to more favorably in the media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment Qnity Electronics 3 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 2 Neutral mention(s) 1 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive ASML 18 Very Positive mention(s) 8 Positive mention(s) 6 Neutral mention(s) 11 Negative mention(s) 1 Very Negative mention(s) Neutral

ASML (ASML) Competitors

$1,591.48 +16.33 (+1.04%)

Closing price 09/15/2026 04:00 PM Eastern

Extended Trading

$1,630.51 +39.03 (+2.45%)

As of 06:29 AM Eastern

Compare

ASML vs. LRCX, AMAT, KLAC, TER, and Q

Should you buy ASML stock or one of its competitors? ASML's main competitors and comparable companies include Lam Research (LRCX), Applied Materials (AMAT), KLA (KLAC), Teradyne (TER), and Qnity Electronics (Q). Companies are selected based on similarities in market, industry, and size. These companies are all part of the "semiconductor materials & equipment" industry.

How does ASML compare to Lam Research?

Lam Research (NASDAQ:LRCX) and ASML (NASDAQ:ASML) are both large-cap technology companies, but which is the better investment? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their valuation, earnings, dividends, media sentiment, profitability, risk, institutional ownership and analyst recommendations.

Lam Research has a beta of 1.85, indicating that its stock price is 85% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, ASML has a beta of 1.79, indicating that its stock price is 79% more volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, ASML had 4 more articles in the media than Lam Research. MarketBeat recorded 47 mentions for ASML and 43 mentions for Lam Research. Lam Research's average media sentiment score of 0.87 beat ASML's score of 0.50 indicating that Lam Research is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Lam Research	24 Very Positive mention(s)	8 Positive mention(s)	5 Neutral mention(s)	3 Negative mention(s)	1 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive
ASML	18 Very Positive mention(s)	8 Positive mention(s)	6 Neutral mention(s)	11 Negative mention(s)	1 Very Negative mention(s)	Neutral

Lam Research pays an annual dividend of $1.04 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.4%. ASML pays an annual dividend of $7.27 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.5%. Lam Research pays out 18.1% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. ASML pays out 22.6% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Lam Research has increased its dividend for 10 consecutive years.

ASML has higher revenue and earnings than Lam Research. Lam Research is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than ASML, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Lam Research	$23.23B	14.59	$7.27B	$5.76	47.03
ASML	$36.95B	16.94	$10.87B	$32.14	49.52

Lam Research presently has a consensus price target of $361.81, suggesting a potential upside of 33.57%. ASML has a consensus price target of $1,970.33, suggesting a potential upside of 23.81%. Given Lam Research's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, equities research analysts plainly believe Lam Research is more favorable than ASML.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Lam Research	0 Sell rating(s)	5 Hold rating(s)	26 Buy rating(s)	1 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.88
ASML	3 Sell rating(s)	4 Hold rating(s)	21 Buy rating(s)	3 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.77

Lam Research has a net margin of 31.27% compared to ASML's net margin of 30.11%. Lam Research's return on equity of 67.60% beat ASML's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Lam Research	31.27%	67.60%	33.48%
ASML	30.11%	52.71%	22.10%

84.6% of Lam Research shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 26.1% of ASML shares are held by institutional investors. 0.3% of Lam Research shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Summary

Lam Research beats ASML on 12 of the 20 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does ASML compare to Applied Materials?

Applied Materials (NASDAQ:AMAT) and ASML (NASDAQ:ASML) are both large-cap technology companies, but which is the better investment? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their earnings, institutional ownership, analyst recommendations, risk, valuation, media sentiment, dividends and profitability.

ASML has higher revenue and earnings than Applied Materials. Applied Materials is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than ASML, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Applied Materials	$30.84B	10.84	$7.00B	$11.60	36.31
ASML	$36.95B	16.94	$10.87B	$32.14	49.52

In the previous week, Applied Materials had 3 more articles in the media than ASML. MarketBeat recorded 50 mentions for Applied Materials and 47 mentions for ASML. Applied Materials' average media sentiment score of 0.87 beat ASML's score of 0.50 indicating that Applied Materials is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Applied Materials	27 Very Positive mention(s)	5 Positive mention(s)	11 Neutral mention(s)	4 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive
ASML	18 Very Positive mention(s)	8 Positive mention(s)	6 Neutral mention(s)	11 Negative mention(s)	1 Very Negative mention(s)	Neutral

80.6% of Applied Materials shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 26.1% of ASML shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.3% of Applied Materials shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Applied Materials pays an annual dividend of $2.12 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.5%. ASML pays an annual dividend of $7.27 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.5%. Applied Materials pays out 18.3% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. ASML pays out 22.6% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Applied Materials has increased its dividend for 8 consecutive years. Applied Materials is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

Applied Materials currently has a consensus target price of $658.45, indicating a potential upside of 56.34%. ASML has a consensus target price of $1,970.33, indicating a potential upside of 23.81%. Given Applied Materials' stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, research analysts plainly believe Applied Materials is more favorable than ASML.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Applied Materials	0 Sell rating(s)	5 Hold rating(s)	27 Buy rating(s)	1 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.88
ASML	3 Sell rating(s)	4 Hold rating(s)	21 Buy rating(s)	3 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.77

Applied Materials has a beta of 1.6, indicating that its stock price is 60% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, ASML has a beta of 1.79, indicating that its stock price is 79% more volatile than the broader market.

ASML has a net margin of 30.11% compared to Applied Materials' net margin of 30.05%. ASML's return on equity of 52.71% beat Applied Materials' return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Applied Materials	30.05%	38.02%	22.09%
ASML	30.11%	52.71%	22.10%

Summary

Applied Materials and ASML tied by winning 10 of the 20 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does ASML compare to KLA?

KLA (NASDAQ:KLAC) and ASML (NASDAQ:ASML) are both large-cap technology companies, but which is the better stock? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their dividends, profitability, earnings, media sentiment, valuation, analyst recommendations, risk and institutional ownership.

In the previous week, ASML had 21 more articles in the media than KLA. MarketBeat recorded 47 mentions for ASML and 26 mentions for KLA. KLA's average media sentiment score of 1.13 beat ASML's score of 0.50 indicating that KLA is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
KLA	17 Very Positive mention(s)	2 Positive mention(s)	4 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	2 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive
ASML	18 Very Positive mention(s)	8 Positive mention(s)	6 Neutral mention(s)	11 Negative mention(s)	1 Very Negative mention(s)	Neutral

86.7% of KLA shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 26.1% of ASML shares are owned by institutional investors. 91.5% of KLA shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

KLA has a beta of 1.45, meaning that its stock price is 45% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, ASML has a beta of 1.79, meaning that its stock price is 79% more volatile than the broader market.

ASML has higher revenue and earnings than KLA. KLA is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than ASML, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
KLA	$13.58B	16.17	$4.83B	$3.67	45.78
ASML	$36.95B	16.94	$10.87B	$32.14	49.52

KLA pays an annual dividend of $0.92 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.5%. ASML pays an annual dividend of $7.27 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.5%. KLA pays out 25.1% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. ASML pays out 22.6% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. KLA has raised its dividend for 16 consecutive years. KLA is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

KLA presently has a consensus target price of $222.22, suggesting a potential upside of 32.26%. ASML has a consensus target price of $1,970.33, suggesting a potential upside of 23.81%. Given KLA's higher possible upside, equities research analysts clearly believe KLA is more favorable than ASML.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
KLA	0 Sell rating(s)	9 Hold rating(s)	19 Buy rating(s)	1 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.72
ASML	3 Sell rating(s)	4 Hold rating(s)	21 Buy rating(s)	3 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.77

KLA has a net margin of 35.57% compared to ASML's net margin of 30.11%. KLA's return on equity of 87.66% beat ASML's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
KLA	35.57%	87.66%	29.23%
ASML	30.11%	52.71%	22.10%

Summary

ASML beats KLA on 11 of the 20 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does ASML compare to Teradyne?

Teradyne (NASDAQ:TER) and ASML (NASDAQ:ASML) are both large-cap technology companies, but which is the superior business? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their valuation, earnings, risk, analyst recommendations, dividends, media sentiment, institutional ownership and profitability.

ASML has higher revenue and earnings than Teradyne. Teradyne is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than ASML, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Teradyne	$3.19B	16.31	$554.05M	$7.29	45.66
ASML	$36.95B	16.94	$10.87B	$32.14	49.52

Teradyne pays an annual dividend of $0.52 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.2%. ASML pays an annual dividend of $7.27 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.5%. Teradyne pays out 7.1% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. ASML pays out 22.6% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Teradyne has raised its dividend for 1 consecutive years.

ASML has a net margin of 30.11% compared to Teradyne's net margin of 25.77%. ASML's return on equity of 52.71% beat Teradyne's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Teradyne	25.77%	39.93%	27.67%
ASML	30.11%	52.71%	22.10%

Teradyne has a beta of 1.78, indicating that its share price is 78% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, ASML has a beta of 1.79, indicating that its share price is 79% more volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, ASML had 23 more articles in the media than Teradyne. MarketBeat recorded 47 mentions for ASML and 24 mentions for Teradyne. Teradyne's average media sentiment score of 0.67 beat ASML's score of 0.50 indicating that Teradyne is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Teradyne	10 Very Positive mention(s)	2 Positive mention(s)	9 Neutral mention(s)	1 Negative mention(s)	1 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive
ASML	18 Very Positive mention(s)	8 Positive mention(s)	6 Neutral mention(s)	11 Negative mention(s)	1 Very Negative mention(s)	Neutral

Teradyne presently has a consensus price target of $396.80, suggesting a potential upside of 19.21%. ASML has a consensus price target of $1,970.33, suggesting a potential upside of 23.81%. Given ASML's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe ASML is more favorable than Teradyne.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Teradyne	0 Sell rating(s)	5 Hold rating(s)	10 Buy rating(s)	1 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.75
ASML	3 Sell rating(s)	4 Hold rating(s)	21 Buy rating(s)	3 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.77

99.8% of Teradyne shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 26.1% of ASML shares are held by institutional investors. 0.2% of Teradyne shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Summary

ASML beats Teradyne on 14 of the 20 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does ASML compare to Qnity Electronics?

Qnity Electronics (NYSE:Q) and ASML (NASDAQ:ASML) are both large-cap technology companies, but which is the better stock? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their dividends, institutional ownership, media sentiment, earnings, analyst recommendations, risk, profitability and valuation.

Qnity Electronics pays an annual dividend of $0.32 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.3%. ASML pays an annual dividend of $7.27 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.5%. Qnity Electronics pays out 11.4% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. ASML pays out 22.6% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years.

26.1% of ASML shares are held by institutional investors. 0.2% of Qnity Electronics shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Qnity Electronics currently has a consensus target price of $151.78, indicating a potential upside of 32.33%. ASML has a consensus target price of $1,970.33, indicating a potential upside of 23.81%. Given Qnity Electronics' stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, equities research analysts plainly believe Qnity Electronics is more favorable than ASML.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Qnity Electronics	0 Sell rating(s)	1 Hold rating(s)	8 Buy rating(s)	1 Strong Buy rating(s)	3.00
ASML	3 Sell rating(s)	4 Hold rating(s)	21 Buy rating(s)	3 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.77

ASML has higher revenue and earnings than Qnity Electronics. Qnity Electronics is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than ASML, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Qnity Electronics	$4.75B	5.05	$692M	$2.80	40.96
ASML	$36.95B	16.94	$10.87B	$32.14	49.52

ASML has a net margin of 30.11% compared to Qnity Electronics' net margin of 11.25%. ASML's return on equity of 52.71% beat Qnity Electronics' return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Qnity Electronics	11.25%	10.83%	6.26%
ASML	30.11%	52.71%	22.10%

In the previous week, ASML had 41 more articles in the media than Qnity Electronics. MarketBeat recorded 47 mentions for ASML and 6 mentions for Qnity Electronics. Qnity Electronics' average media sentiment score of 0.93 beat ASML's score of 0.50 indicating that Qnity Electronics is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Qnity Electronics	3 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	2 Neutral mention(s)	1 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive
ASML	18 Very Positive mention(s)	8 Positive mention(s)	6 Neutral mention(s)	11 Negative mention(s)	1 Very Negative mention(s)	Neutral

Summary

ASML beats Qnity Electronics on 13 of the 18 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get ASML News Delivered to You Automatically

Subscribe Now

SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding ASML and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of NASDAQ and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.

ASML vs. The Competition

Export

Metric	ASML	Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment Industry	Technology Sector	NASDAQ Exchange
Market Cap	$619.48B	$105.43B	$29.46B	$15.01B
Dividend Yield	0.46%	1.65%	2.75%	12.21%
P/E Ratio	49.52	70.65	76.23	25.31
Price / Sales	16.94	85.73	589.01	112.36
Price / Cash	51.49	59.86	47.48	51.48
Price / Book	28.21	9.67	7.67	6.18
Net Income	$10.87B	$2.05B	$705.00M	$357.96M
7 Day Performance	-7.98%	-5.21%	-1.03%	-0.56%
1 Month Performance	-13.72%	-12.16%	-4.80%	-3.62%
1 Year Performance	81.18%	71.29%	176.46%	6.05%

ASML Competitors List

Export

Company	MarketRank	Share Price	Analysts' Price Target	1Y Price Performance	Market Cap	Revenue	P/E Ratio	Employee Count	Indicator(s)
ASML ASML	4.8283 of 5 stars	$1,591.48 +1.0%	$1,970.33 +23.8%	+83.5%	$619.48B	$36.95B	49.52	44,209	Trending News Analyst Forecast Analyst Revision Gap Up
LRCX Lam Research	4.9415 of 5 stars	$288.66 -0.5%	$358.97 +24.4%	+127.2%	$361.08B	$23.23B	50.10	23,300	Trending News
AMAT Applied Materials	4.9138 of 5 stars	$438.81 -0.7%	$658.45 +50.1%	+146.4%	$347.92B	$28.37B	37.79	36,500	Trending News Dividend Announcement
KLAC KLA	4.9072 of 5 stars	$170.40 -0.3%	$222.22 +30.4%	+69.9%	$222.33B	$13.58B	46.40	17,200	Positive News
TER Teradyne	4.8369 of 5 stars	$336.43 +0.3%	$396.80 +17.9%	+191.8%	$52.54B	$3.19B	46.10	6,600	Trending News

Related Companies and Tools

Related Companies

Top 10 Stock Comparisons

This page (NASDAQ:ASML) was last updated on 9/16/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.

From Our Partners

Unlock superior investment research and tools.

Get MarketBeat All Access

In-depth profiles and analysis for 20,000 public companies.
Real-time analyst ratings, insider transactions, earnings data, and more.
Our daily ratings and market update email newsletter.

Sign In
Create Account

Your Email Address:

Your Password:

Forgot your password?

Your Email Address:

Choose a Password:

By creating a free account, you agree to our terms of service. This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

ASML (ASML) Competitors