Which has stronger valuation & earnings, ASML or LRCX?

ASML has higher revenue and earnings than Lam Research. ASML is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Lam Research, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks. Company Gross Revenue Price/Sales Ratio Net Income Earnings Per Share Price/Earnings Ratio ASML $36.95B 19.79 $10.87B $32.14 57.87 Lam Research $23.23B 18.63 $7.27B $5.76 60.03

Is ASML or LRCX more profitable?

Lam Research has a net margin of 31.27% compared to ASML's net margin of 30.11%. Lam Research's return on equity of 67.60% beat ASML's return on equity. Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets ASML 30.11% 52.71% 22.10% Lam Research 31.27% 67.60% 33.48%

Does the media refer more to ASML or LRCX?

In the previous week, Lam Research had 5 more articles in the media than ASML. MarketBeat recorded 29 mentions for Lam Research and 24 mentions for ASML. Lam Research's average media sentiment score of 0.70 beat ASML's score of 0.43 indicating that Lam Research is being referred to more favorably in the news media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment ASML 7 Very Positive mention(s) 8 Positive mention(s) 7 Neutral mention(s) 1 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Neutral Lam Research 10 Very Positive mention(s) 7 Positive mention(s) 10 Neutral mention(s) 1 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive

Which has preferable earnings and valuation, AMAT or ASML?

ASML has higher revenue and earnings than Applied Materials. Applied Materials is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than ASML, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks. Company Gross Revenue Price/Sales Ratio Net Income Earnings Per Share Price/Earnings Ratio Applied Materials $28.37B 15.17 $7.00B $11.60 46.75 ASML $36.95B 19.79 $10.87B $32.14 57.87

Is AMAT or ASML more profitable?

ASML has a net margin of 30.11% compared to Applied Materials' net margin of 30.05%. ASML's return on equity of 52.71% beat Applied Materials' return on equity. Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets Applied Materials 30.05% 38.02% 22.09% ASML 30.11% 52.71% 22.10%

Does the media favor AMAT or ASML?

In the previous week, Applied Materials had 12 more articles in the media than ASML. MarketBeat recorded 36 mentions for Applied Materials and 24 mentions for ASML. Applied Materials' average media sentiment score of 0.64 beat ASML's score of 0.43 indicating that Applied Materials is being referred to more favorably in the media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment Applied Materials 16 Very Positive mention(s) 11 Positive mention(s) 7 Neutral mention(s) 1 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive ASML 7 Very Positive mention(s) 8 Positive mention(s) 7 Neutral mention(s) 1 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Neutral

Do analysts recommend ASML or KLAC?

ASML currently has a consensus target price of $1,970.33, indicating a potential upside of 5.94%. KLA has a consensus target price of $222.22, indicating a potential upside of 7.43%. Given KLA's higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe KLA is more favorable than ASML. Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score ASML 3 Sell rating(s) 4 Hold rating(s) 19 Buy rating(s) 3 Strong Buy rating(s) 2.76 KLA 0 Sell rating(s) 11 Hold rating(s) 18 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 2.62

Which has stronger valuation and earnings, ASML or KLAC?

ASML has higher revenue and earnings than KLA. KLA is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than ASML, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks. Company Gross Revenue Price/Sales Ratio Net Income Earnings Per Share Price/Earnings Ratio ASML $36.95B 19.79 $10.87B $32.14 57.87 KLA $13.58B 19.88 $4.83B $3.67 56.36

Is ASML or KLAC more profitable?

KLA has a net margin of 35.57% compared to ASML's net margin of 30.11%. KLA's return on equity of 87.66% beat ASML's return on equity. Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets ASML 30.11% 52.71% 22.10% KLA 35.57% 87.66% 29.23%

Does the media favor ASML or KLAC?

In the previous week, ASML had 16 more articles in the media than KLA. MarketBeat recorded 24 mentions for ASML and 8 mentions for KLA. KLA's average media sentiment score of 0.47 beat ASML's score of 0.43 indicating that KLA is being referred to more favorably in the news media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment ASML 7 Very Positive mention(s) 8 Positive mention(s) 7 Neutral mention(s) 1 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Neutral KLA 2 Very Positive mention(s) 2 Positive mention(s) 2 Neutral mention(s) 1 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Neutral

Which has higher valuation & earnings, TER or ASML?

ASML has higher revenue and earnings than Teradyne. ASML is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Teradyne, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks. Company Gross Revenue Price/Sales Ratio Net Income Earnings Per Share Price/Earnings Ratio Teradyne $3.19B 21.79 $554.05M $7.29 60.98 ASML $36.95B 19.79 $10.87B $32.14 57.87

Is TER or ASML more profitable?

ASML has a net margin of 30.11% compared to Teradyne's net margin of 25.77%. ASML's return on equity of 52.71% beat Teradyne's return on equity. Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets Teradyne 25.77% 39.93% 27.67% ASML 30.11% 52.71% 22.10%

Does the media prefer TER or ASML?

In the previous week, Teradyne had 7 more articles in the media than ASML. MarketBeat recorded 31 mentions for Teradyne and 24 mentions for ASML. Teradyne's average media sentiment score of 0.46 beat ASML's score of 0.43 indicating that Teradyne is being referred to more favorably in the media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment Teradyne 7 Very Positive mention(s) 9 Positive mention(s) 10 Neutral mention(s) 4 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Neutral ASML 7 Very Positive mention(s) 8 Positive mention(s) 7 Neutral mention(s) 1 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Neutral

Which has stronger valuation & earnings, Q or ASML?

ASML has higher revenue and earnings than Qnity Electronics. Qnity Electronics is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than ASML, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks. Company Gross Revenue Price/Sales Ratio Net Income Earnings Per Share Price/Earnings Ratio Qnity Electronics $4.75B 5.78 $692M $2.80 46.94 ASML $36.95B 19.79 $10.87B $32.14 57.87

Is Q or ASML more profitable?

ASML has a net margin of 30.11% compared to Qnity Electronics' net margin of 11.25%. ASML's return on equity of 52.71% beat Qnity Electronics' return on equity. Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets Qnity Electronics 11.25% 10.83% 6.26% ASML 30.11% 52.71% 22.10%

Does the media favor Q or ASML?

In the previous week, ASML had 19 more articles in the media than Qnity Electronics. MarketBeat recorded 24 mentions for ASML and 5 mentions for Qnity Electronics. ASML's average media sentiment score of 0.43 beat Qnity Electronics' score of 0.00 indicating that ASML is being referred to more favorably in the news media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment Qnity Electronics 0 Very Positive mention(s) 2 Positive mention(s) 2 Neutral mention(s) 1 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Neutral ASML 7 Very Positive mention(s) 8 Positive mention(s) 7 Neutral mention(s) 1 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Neutral

ASML (ASML) Competitors

$1,834.10 -25.76 (-1.39%)

Closing price 04:00 PM Eastern

Extended Trading

$1,834.75 +0.65 (+0.04%)

As of 06:02 PM Eastern

Compare

ASML vs. LRCX, AMAT, KLAC, TER, and Q

Should you buy ASML stock or one of its competitors? ASML's main competitors and comparable companies include Lam Research (LRCX), Applied Materials (AMAT), KLA (KLAC), Teradyne (TER), and Qnity Electronics (Q). Companies are selected based on similarities in market, industry, and size. These companies are all part of the "semiconductor materials & equipment" industry.

How does ASML compare to Lam Research?

ASML (NASDAQ:ASML) and Lam Research (NASDAQ:LRCX) are both large-cap technology companies, but which is the superior stock? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their risk, analyst recommendations, valuation, profitability, dividends, institutional ownership, media sentiment and earnings.

ASML pays an annual dividend of $7.27 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.4%. Lam Research pays an annual dividend of $1.32 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.4%. ASML pays out 22.6% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Lam Research pays out 22.9% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Lam Research has increased its dividend for 10 consecutive years. ASML is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

In the previous week, Lam Research had 5 more articles in the media than ASML. MarketBeat recorded 29 mentions for Lam Research and 24 mentions for ASML. Lam Research's average media sentiment score of 0.70 beat ASML's score of 0.43 indicating that Lam Research is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
ASML	7 Very Positive mention(s)	8 Positive mention(s)	7 Neutral mention(s)	1 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Neutral
Lam Research	10 Very Positive mention(s)	7 Positive mention(s)	10 Neutral mention(s)	1 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive

26.1% of ASML shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 84.6% of Lam Research shares are held by institutional investors. 0.3% of Lam Research shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

ASML has higher revenue and earnings than Lam Research. ASML is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Lam Research, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
ASML	$36.95B	19.79	$10.87B	$32.14	57.87
Lam Research	$23.23B	18.63	$7.27B	$5.76	60.03

ASML currently has a consensus target price of $1,970.33, indicating a potential upside of 5.94%. Lam Research has a consensus target price of $364.59, indicating a potential upside of 5.43%. Given ASML's higher probable upside, equities analysts plainly believe ASML is more favorable than Lam Research.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
ASML	3 Sell rating(s)	4 Hold rating(s)	19 Buy rating(s)	3 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.76
Lam Research	0 Sell rating(s)	5 Hold rating(s)	26 Buy rating(s)	1 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.88

Lam Research has a net margin of 31.27% compared to ASML's net margin of 30.11%. Lam Research's return on equity of 67.60% beat ASML's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
ASML	30.11%	52.71%	22.10%
Lam Research	31.27%	67.60%	33.48%

ASML has a beta of 1.77, suggesting that its share price is 77% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Lam Research has a beta of 1.85, suggesting that its share price is 85% more volatile than the broader market.

Summary

Lam Research beats ASML on 12 of the 20 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does ASML compare to Applied Materials?

Applied Materials (NASDAQ:AMAT) and ASML (NASDAQ:ASML) are both large-cap technology companies, but which is the superior investment? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their earnings, profitability, analyst recommendations, valuation, institutional ownership, media sentiment, dividends and risk.

In the previous week, Applied Materials had 12 more articles in the media than ASML. MarketBeat recorded 36 mentions for Applied Materials and 24 mentions for ASML. Applied Materials' average media sentiment score of 0.64 beat ASML's score of 0.43 indicating that Applied Materials is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Applied Materials	16 Very Positive mention(s)	11 Positive mention(s)	7 Neutral mention(s)	1 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive
ASML	7 Very Positive mention(s)	8 Positive mention(s)	7 Neutral mention(s)	1 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Neutral

ASML has higher revenue and earnings than Applied Materials. Applied Materials is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than ASML, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Applied Materials	$28.37B	15.17	$7.00B	$11.60	46.75
ASML	$36.95B	19.79	$10.87B	$32.14	57.87

80.6% of Applied Materials shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 26.1% of ASML shares are held by institutional investors. 0.3% of Applied Materials shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Applied Materials currently has a consensus price target of $640.20, suggesting a potential upside of 18.06%. ASML has a consensus price target of $1,970.33, suggesting a potential upside of 5.94%. Given Applied Materials' stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, research analysts clearly believe Applied Materials is more favorable than ASML.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Applied Materials	0 Sell rating(s)	8 Hold rating(s)	30 Buy rating(s)	1 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.82
ASML	3 Sell rating(s)	4 Hold rating(s)	19 Buy rating(s)	3 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.76

Applied Materials pays an annual dividend of $2.12 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.4%. ASML pays an annual dividend of $7.27 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.4%. Applied Materials pays out 18.3% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. ASML pays out 22.6% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Applied Materials has raised its dividend for 8 consecutive years. Applied Materials is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

ASML has a net margin of 30.11% compared to Applied Materials' net margin of 30.05%. ASML's return on equity of 52.71% beat Applied Materials' return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Applied Materials	30.05%	38.02%	22.09%
ASML	30.11%	52.71%	22.10%

Applied Materials has a beta of 1.6, suggesting that its stock price is 60% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, ASML has a beta of 1.77, suggesting that its stock price is 77% more volatile than the broader market.

Summary

Applied Materials and ASML tied by winning 10 of the 20 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does ASML compare to KLA?

ASML (NASDAQ:ASML) and KLA (NASDAQ:KLAC) are both large-cap technology companies, but which is the superior stock? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their profitability, valuation, dividends, earnings, institutional ownership, analyst recommendations, media sentiment and risk.

ASML pays an annual dividend of $7.27 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.4%. KLA pays an annual dividend of $0.92 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.4%. ASML pays out 22.6% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. KLA pays out 25.1% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. KLA has increased its dividend for 16 consecutive years. KLA is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

KLA has a net margin of 35.57% compared to ASML's net margin of 30.11%. KLA's return on equity of 87.66% beat ASML's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
ASML	30.11%	52.71%	22.10%
KLA	35.57%	87.66%	29.23%

ASML has a beta of 1.77, indicating that its stock price is 77% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, KLA has a beta of 1.45, indicating that its stock price is 45% more volatile than the broader market.

ASML currently has a consensus target price of $1,970.33, indicating a potential upside of 5.94%. KLA has a consensus target price of $222.22, indicating a potential upside of 7.43%. Given KLA's higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe KLA is more favorable than ASML.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
ASML	3 Sell rating(s)	4 Hold rating(s)	19 Buy rating(s)	3 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.76
KLA	0 Sell rating(s)	11 Hold rating(s)	18 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.62

26.1% of ASML shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 86.7% of KLA shares are held by institutional investors. 79.4% of KLA shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

ASML has higher revenue and earnings than KLA. KLA is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than ASML, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
ASML	$36.95B	19.79	$10.87B	$32.14	57.87
KLA	$13.58B	19.88	$4.83B	$3.67	56.36

In the previous week, ASML had 16 more articles in the media than KLA. MarketBeat recorded 24 mentions for ASML and 8 mentions for KLA. KLA's average media sentiment score of 0.47 beat ASML's score of 0.43 indicating that KLA is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
ASML	7 Very Positive mention(s)	8 Positive mention(s)	7 Neutral mention(s)	1 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Neutral
KLA	2 Very Positive mention(s)	2 Positive mention(s)	2 Neutral mention(s)	1 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Neutral

Summary

ASML and KLA tied by winning 10 of the 20 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does ASML compare to Teradyne?

Teradyne (NASDAQ:TER) and ASML (NASDAQ:ASML) are both large-cap technology companies, but which is the superior stock? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their risk, valuation, analyst recommendations, earnings, media sentiment, profitability, institutional ownership and dividends.

Teradyne has a beta of 1.75, meaning that its stock price is 75% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, ASML has a beta of 1.77, meaning that its stock price is 77% more volatile than the broader market.

ASML has higher revenue and earnings than Teradyne. ASML is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Teradyne, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Teradyne	$3.19B	21.79	$554.05M	$7.29	60.98
ASML	$36.95B	19.79	$10.87B	$32.14	57.87

ASML has a net margin of 30.11% compared to Teradyne's net margin of 25.77%. ASML's return on equity of 52.71% beat Teradyne's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Teradyne	25.77%	39.93%	27.67%
ASML	30.11%	52.71%	22.10%

99.8% of Teradyne shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 26.1% of ASML shares are held by institutional investors. 0.2% of Teradyne shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Teradyne pays an annual dividend of $0.52 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.1%. ASML pays an annual dividend of $7.27 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.4%. Teradyne pays out 7.1% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. ASML pays out 22.6% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Teradyne has raised its dividend for 1 consecutive years.

In the previous week, Teradyne had 7 more articles in the media than ASML. MarketBeat recorded 31 mentions for Teradyne and 24 mentions for ASML. Teradyne's average media sentiment score of 0.46 beat ASML's score of 0.43 indicating that Teradyne is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Teradyne	7 Very Positive mention(s)	9 Positive mention(s)	10 Neutral mention(s)	4 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Neutral
ASML	7 Very Positive mention(s)	8 Positive mention(s)	7 Neutral mention(s)	1 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Neutral

Teradyne currently has a consensus price target of $396.80, indicating a potential downside of 10.74%. ASML has a consensus price target of $1,970.33, indicating a potential upside of 5.94%. Given ASML's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe ASML is more favorable than Teradyne.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Teradyne	0 Sell rating(s)	5 Hold rating(s)	11 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.69
ASML	3 Sell rating(s)	4 Hold rating(s)	19 Buy rating(s)	3 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.76

Summary

ASML beats Teradyne on 11 of the 20 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does ASML compare to Qnity Electronics?

Qnity Electronics (NYSE:Q) and ASML (NASDAQ:ASML) are both large-cap technology companies, but which is the superior business? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their dividends, media sentiment, risk, valuation, institutional ownership, earnings, analyst recommendations and profitability.

ASML has a net margin of 30.11% compared to Qnity Electronics' net margin of 11.25%. ASML's return on equity of 52.71% beat Qnity Electronics' return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Qnity Electronics	11.25%	10.83%	6.26%
ASML	30.11%	52.71%	22.10%

Qnity Electronics pays an annual dividend of $0.32 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.2%. ASML pays an annual dividend of $7.27 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.4%. Qnity Electronics pays out 11.4% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. ASML pays out 22.6% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years.

In the previous week, ASML had 19 more articles in the media than Qnity Electronics. MarketBeat recorded 24 mentions for ASML and 5 mentions for Qnity Electronics. ASML's average media sentiment score of 0.43 beat Qnity Electronics' score of 0.00 indicating that ASML is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Qnity Electronics	0 Very Positive mention(s)	2 Positive mention(s)	2 Neutral mention(s)	1 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Neutral
ASML	7 Very Positive mention(s)	8 Positive mention(s)	7 Neutral mention(s)	1 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Neutral

26.1% of ASML shares are held by institutional investors. 0.2% of Qnity Electronics shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

ASML has higher revenue and earnings than Qnity Electronics. Qnity Electronics is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than ASML, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Qnity Electronics	$4.75B	5.78	$692M	$2.80	46.94
ASML	$36.95B	19.79	$10.87B	$32.14	57.87

Qnity Electronics presently has a consensus price target of $149.56, suggesting a potential upside of 13.79%. ASML has a consensus price target of $1,970.33, suggesting a potential upside of 5.94%. Given Qnity Electronics' stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, equities research analysts clearly believe Qnity Electronics is more favorable than ASML.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Qnity Electronics	0 Sell rating(s)	1 Hold rating(s)	8 Buy rating(s)	1 Strong Buy rating(s)	3.00
ASML	3 Sell rating(s)	4 Hold rating(s)	19 Buy rating(s)	3 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.76

Summary

ASML beats Qnity Electronics on 14 of the 18 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get ASML News Delivered to You Automatically

Subscribe Now

SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding ASML and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of NASDAQ and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.

ASML vs. The Competition

Export

Metric	ASML	Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment Industry	Technology Sector	NASDAQ Exchange
Market Cap	$721.32B	$121.05B	$31.93B	$13.40B
Dividend Yield	0.40%	1.60%	2.75%	17.38%
P/E Ratio	57.07	93.25	82.36	26.32
Price / Sales	20.42	78.68	582.96	100.33
Price / Cash	61.04	68.54	48.60	34.74
Price / Book	32.51	11.19	8.23	6.35
Net Income	$10.87B	$2.56B	$766.00M	$381.26M
7 Day Performance	-0.02%	3.40%	1.53%	-0.62%
1 Month Performance	6.95%	8.23%	0.28%	-4.85%
1 Year Performance	75.80%	71.28%	168.04%	1.12%

ASML Competitors List

Export

Company	MarketRank	Share Price	Analysts' Price Target	1Y Price Performance	Market Cap	Revenue	P/E Ratio	Employee Count	Indicator(s)
ASML ASML	4.666 of 5 stars	$1,834.10 -1.4%	$1,970.33 +7.4%	+80.2%	$721.32B	$35.33B	57.07	44,209
LRCX Lam Research	4.8692 of 5 stars	$300.72 -3.3%	$361.81 +20.3%	+137.2%	$376.30B	$23.23B	52.21	23,300	Analyst Forecast
AMAT Applied Materials	4.9383 of 5 stars	$464.19 -1.8%	$658.45 +41.9%	+149.3%	$368.38B	$28.37B	40.02	36,500	Trending News Insider Trade
KLAC KLA	4.7377 of 5 stars	$183.08 -2.8%	$222.22 +21.4%	+87.8%	$239.20B	$13.58B	49.93	17,200	Analyst Forecast
TER Teradyne	4.0083 of 5 stars	$381.29 -4.4%	$396.80 +4.1%	+205.2%	$59.61B	$3.19B	52.30	6,600	Trending News

Related Companies and Tools

Related Companies

Top 10 Stock Comparisons

This page (NASDAQ:ASML) was last updated on 10/6/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.

From Our Partners

Unlock superior investment research and tools.

Get MarketBeat All Access

In-depth profiles and analysis for 20,000 public companies.
Real-time analyst ratings, insider transactions, earnings data, and more.
Our daily ratings and market update email newsletter.

Sign In
Create Account

Your Email Address:

Your Password:

Forgot your password?

Your Email Address:

Choose a Password:

By creating a free account, you agree to our terms of service. This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

ASML (ASML) Competitors