Which has higher valuation and earnings, LRCX or ASML?

ASML has higher revenue and earnings than Lam Research. ASML is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Lam Research, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks. Company Gross Revenue Price/Sales Ratio Net Income Earnings Per Share Price/Earnings Ratio Lam Research $23.23B 16.85 $7.27B $5.76 54.32 ASML $36.95B 18.58 $10.87B $32.14 54.31

Is LRCX or ASML more profitable?

Lam Research has a net margin of 31.27% compared to ASML's net margin of 30.11%. Lam Research's return on equity of 67.60% beat ASML's return on equity. Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets Lam Research 31.27% 67.60% 33.48% ASML 30.11% 52.71% 22.10%

Does the media favor LRCX or ASML?

In the previous week, Lam Research had 31 more articles in the media than ASML. MarketBeat recorded 58 mentions for Lam Research and 27 mentions for ASML. Lam Research's average media sentiment score of 1.34 beat ASML's score of 1.21 indicating that Lam Research is being referred to more favorably in the media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment Lam Research 44 Very Positive mention(s) 3 Positive mention(s) 9 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive ASML 19 Very Positive mention(s) 1 Positive mention(s) 4 Neutral mention(s) 2 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive

Which has stronger valuation & earnings, ASML or AMAT?

ASML has higher revenue and earnings than Applied Materials. Applied Materials is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than ASML, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks. Company Gross Revenue Price/Sales Ratio Net Income Earnings Per Share Price/Earnings Ratio ASML $36.95B 18.58 $10.87B $32.14 54.31 Applied Materials $30.84B 12.35 $7.00B $11.60 41.36

Is ASML or AMAT more profitable?

ASML has a net margin of 30.11% compared to Applied Materials' net margin of 30.05%. ASML's return on equity of 52.71% beat Applied Materials' return on equity. Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets ASML 30.11% 52.71% 22.10% Applied Materials 30.05% 38.02% 22.09%

Does the media prefer ASML or AMAT?

In the previous week, Applied Materials had 78 more articles in the media than ASML. MarketBeat recorded 105 mentions for Applied Materials and 27 mentions for ASML. Applied Materials' average media sentiment score of 1.31 beat ASML's score of 1.21 indicating that Applied Materials is being referred to more favorably in the news media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment ASML 19 Very Positive mention(s) 1 Positive mention(s) 4 Neutral mention(s) 2 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive Applied Materials 85 Very Positive mention(s) 7 Positive mention(s) 6 Neutral mention(s) 3 Negative mention(s) 2 Very Negative mention(s) Positive

Do analysts prefer ASML or KLAC?

ASML currently has a consensus target price of $1,970.33, suggesting a potential upside of 12.87%. KLA has a consensus target price of $223.70, suggesting a potential upside of 21.69%. Given KLA's higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe KLA is more favorable than ASML. Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score ASML 3 Sell rating(s) 4 Hold rating(s) 21 Buy rating(s) 4 Strong Buy rating(s) 2.81 KLA 0 Sell rating(s) 9 Hold rating(s) 19 Buy rating(s) 1 Strong Buy rating(s) 2.72

Which has stronger earnings & valuation, ASML or KLAC?

ASML has higher revenue and earnings than KLA. KLA is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than ASML, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks. Company Gross Revenue Price/Sales Ratio Net Income Earnings Per Share Price/Earnings Ratio ASML $36.95B 18.58 $10.87B $32.14 54.31 KLA $13.58B 17.69 $4.83B $3.67 50.09

Is ASML or KLAC more profitable?

KLA has a net margin of 35.57% compared to ASML's net margin of 30.11%. KLA's return on equity of 87.66% beat ASML's return on equity. Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets ASML 30.11% 52.71% 22.10% KLA 35.57% 87.66% 29.23%

Does the media favor ASML or KLAC?

In the previous week, ASML had 8 more articles in the media than KLA. MarketBeat recorded 27 mentions for ASML and 19 mentions for KLA. ASML's average media sentiment score of 1.21 beat KLA's score of 0.85 indicating that ASML is being referred to more favorably in the media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment ASML 19 Very Positive mention(s) 1 Positive mention(s) 4 Neutral mention(s) 2 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive KLA 13 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 4 Neutral mention(s) 1 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive

Which has stronger valuation and earnings, TER or ASML?

ASML has higher revenue and earnings than Teradyne. Teradyne is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than ASML, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks. Company Gross Revenue Price/Sales Ratio Net Income Earnings Per Share Price/Earnings Ratio Teradyne $3.19B 17.80 $554.05M $7.29 49.81 ASML $36.95B 18.58 $10.87B $32.14 54.31

Is TER or ASML more profitable?

ASML has a net margin of 30.11% compared to Teradyne's net margin of 25.77%. ASML's return on equity of 52.71% beat Teradyne's return on equity. Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets Teradyne 25.77% 39.93% 27.67% ASML 30.11% 52.71% 22.10%

Does the media prefer TER or ASML?

In the previous week, Teradyne had 34 more articles in the media than ASML. MarketBeat recorded 61 mentions for Teradyne and 27 mentions for ASML. Teradyne's average media sentiment score of 1.40 beat ASML's score of 1.21 indicating that Teradyne is being referred to more favorably in the media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment Teradyne 48 Very Positive mention(s) 7 Positive mention(s) 3 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive ASML 19 Very Positive mention(s) 1 Positive mention(s) 4 Neutral mention(s) 2 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive

Which has better valuation & earnings, ASML or Q?

ASML has higher revenue and earnings than Qnity Electronics. Qnity Electronics is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than ASML, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks. Company Gross Revenue Price/Sales Ratio Net Income Earnings Per Share Price/Earnings Ratio ASML $36.95B 18.58 $10.87B $32.14 54.31 Qnity Electronics $4.75B 5.55 $692M $2.80 45.06

Is ASML or Q more profitable?

ASML has a net margin of 30.11% compared to Qnity Electronics' net margin of 11.25%. ASML's return on equity of 52.71% beat Qnity Electronics' return on equity. Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets ASML 30.11% 52.71% 22.10% Qnity Electronics 11.25% 10.83% 6.26%

Does the media refer more to ASML or Q?

In the previous week, ASML had 18 more articles in the media than Qnity Electronics. MarketBeat recorded 27 mentions for ASML and 9 mentions for Qnity Electronics. ASML's average media sentiment score of 1.21 beat Qnity Electronics' score of 0.72 indicating that ASML is being referred to more favorably in the media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment ASML 19 Very Positive mention(s) 1 Positive mention(s) 4 Neutral mention(s) 2 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive Qnity Electronics 3 Very Positive mention(s) 1 Positive mention(s) 5 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive

ASML (ASML) Competitors

$1,745.64 +1.48 (+0.08%)

As of 04:00 PM Eastern

Compare

ASML vs. LRCX, AMAT, KLAC, TER, and Q

Should you buy ASML stock or one of its competitors? ASML's main competitors and comparable companies include Lam Research (LRCX), Applied Materials (AMAT), KLA (KLAC), Teradyne (TER), and Qnity Electronics (Q). Companies are selected based on similarities in market, industry, and size. These companies are all part of the "semiconductor materials & equipment" industry.

How does ASML compare to Lam Research?

Lam Research (NASDAQ:LRCX) and ASML (NASDAQ:ASML) are both large-cap technology companies, but which is the superior business? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their profitability, valuation, risk, institutional ownership, media sentiment, earnings, analyst recommendations and dividends.

Lam Research pays an annual dividend of $1.04 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.3%. ASML pays an annual dividend of $7.27 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.4%. Lam Research pays out 18.1% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. ASML pays out 22.6% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Lam Research has increased its dividend for 10 consecutive years.

Lam Research has a beta of 1.84, meaning that its stock price is 84% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, ASML has a beta of 1.79, meaning that its stock price is 79% more volatile than the broader market.

Lam Research presently has a consensus target price of $357.31, suggesting a potential upside of 14.20%. ASML has a consensus target price of $1,970.33, suggesting a potential upside of 12.87%. Given Lam Research's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Lam Research is more favorable than ASML.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Lam Research	0 Sell rating(s)	5 Hold rating(s)	26 Buy rating(s)	1 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.88
ASML	3 Sell rating(s)	4 Hold rating(s)	21 Buy rating(s)	4 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.81

84.6% of Lam Research shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 26.1% of ASML shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.3% of Lam Research shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Lam Research has a net margin of 31.27% compared to ASML's net margin of 30.11%. Lam Research's return on equity of 67.60% beat ASML's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Lam Research	31.27%	67.60%	33.48%
ASML	30.11%	52.71%	22.10%

In the previous week, Lam Research had 31 more articles in the media than ASML. MarketBeat recorded 58 mentions for Lam Research and 27 mentions for ASML. Lam Research's average media sentiment score of 1.34 beat ASML's score of 1.21 indicating that Lam Research is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Lam Research	44 Very Positive mention(s)	3 Positive mention(s)	9 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive
ASML	19 Very Positive mention(s)	1 Positive mention(s)	4 Neutral mention(s)	2 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive

ASML has higher revenue and earnings than Lam Research. ASML is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Lam Research, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Lam Research	$23.23B	16.85	$7.27B	$5.76	54.32
ASML	$36.95B	18.58	$10.87B	$32.14	54.31

Summary

Lam Research beats ASML on 14 of the 20 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does ASML compare to Applied Materials?

ASML (NASDAQ:ASML) and Applied Materials (NASDAQ:AMAT) are both large-cap technology companies, but which is the better business? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their risk, media sentiment, valuation, dividends, institutional ownership, analyst recommendations, earnings and profitability.

ASML pays an annual dividend of $7.27 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.4%. Applied Materials pays an annual dividend of $2.12 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.4%. ASML pays out 22.6% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Applied Materials pays out 18.3% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Applied Materials has raised its dividend for 8 consecutive years. Applied Materials is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

In the previous week, Applied Materials had 78 more articles in the media than ASML. MarketBeat recorded 105 mentions for Applied Materials and 27 mentions for ASML. Applied Materials' average media sentiment score of 1.31 beat ASML's score of 1.21 indicating that Applied Materials is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
ASML	19 Very Positive mention(s)	1 Positive mention(s)	4 Neutral mention(s)	2 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive
Applied Materials	85 Very Positive mention(s)	7 Positive mention(s)	6 Neutral mention(s)	3 Negative mention(s)	2 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive

ASML has a beta of 1.79, suggesting that its stock price is 79% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Applied Materials has a beta of 1.61, suggesting that its stock price is 61% more volatile than the broader market.

26.1% of ASML shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 80.6% of Applied Materials shares are held by institutional investors. 0.3% of Applied Materials shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

ASML presently has a consensus price target of $1,970.33, suggesting a potential upside of 12.87%. Applied Materials has a consensus price target of $657.76, suggesting a potential upside of 37.10%. Given Applied Materials' stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Applied Materials is more favorable than ASML.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
ASML	3 Sell rating(s)	4 Hold rating(s)	21 Buy rating(s)	4 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.81
Applied Materials	0 Sell rating(s)	5 Hold rating(s)	27 Buy rating(s)	1 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.88

ASML has a net margin of 30.11% compared to Applied Materials' net margin of 30.05%. ASML's return on equity of 52.71% beat Applied Materials' return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
ASML	30.11%	52.71%	22.10%
Applied Materials	30.05%	38.02%	22.09%

ASML has higher revenue and earnings than Applied Materials. Applied Materials is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than ASML, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
ASML	$36.95B	18.58	$10.87B	$32.14	54.31
Applied Materials	$30.84B	12.35	$7.00B	$11.60	41.36

Summary

ASML and Applied Materials tied by winning 10 of the 20 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does ASML compare to KLA?

ASML (NASDAQ:ASML) and KLA (NASDAQ:KLAC) are both large-cap technology companies, but which is the superior investment? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their valuation, analyst recommendations, media sentiment, profitability, institutional ownership, risk, dividends and earnings.

In the previous week, ASML had 8 more articles in the media than KLA. MarketBeat recorded 27 mentions for ASML and 19 mentions for KLA. ASML's average media sentiment score of 1.21 beat KLA's score of 0.85 indicating that ASML is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
ASML	19 Very Positive mention(s)	1 Positive mention(s)	4 Neutral mention(s)	2 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive
KLA	13 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	4 Neutral mention(s)	1 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive

ASML has a beta of 1.79, indicating that its share price is 79% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, KLA has a beta of 1.45, indicating that its share price is 45% more volatile than the broader market.

ASML currently has a consensus target price of $1,970.33, suggesting a potential upside of 12.87%. KLA has a consensus target price of $223.70, suggesting a potential upside of 21.69%. Given KLA's higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe KLA is more favorable than ASML.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
ASML	3 Sell rating(s)	4 Hold rating(s)	21 Buy rating(s)	4 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.81
KLA	0 Sell rating(s)	9 Hold rating(s)	19 Buy rating(s)	1 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.72

ASML has higher revenue and earnings than KLA. KLA is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than ASML, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
ASML	$36.95B	18.58	$10.87B	$32.14	54.31
KLA	$13.58B	17.69	$4.83B	$3.67	50.09

KLA has a net margin of 35.57% compared to ASML's net margin of 30.11%. KLA's return on equity of 87.66% beat ASML's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
ASML	30.11%	52.71%	22.10%
KLA	35.57%	87.66%	29.23%

ASML pays an annual dividend of $7.27 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.4%. KLA pays an annual dividend of $0.92 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.5%. ASML pays out 22.6% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. KLA pays out 25.1% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. KLA has raised its dividend for 16 consecutive years. KLA is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

26.1% of ASML shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 86.7% of KLA shares are held by institutional investors. 91.5% of KLA shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Summary

ASML beats KLA on 12 of the 20 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does ASML compare to Teradyne?

Teradyne (NASDAQ:TER) and ASML (NASDAQ:ASML) are both large-cap technology companies, but which is the better stock? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their valuation, earnings, analyst recommendations, media sentiment, institutional ownership, dividends, risk and profitability.

99.8% of Teradyne shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 26.1% of ASML shares are held by institutional investors. 0.2% of Teradyne shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Teradyne has a beta of 1.78, meaning that its share price is 78% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, ASML has a beta of 1.79, meaning that its share price is 79% more volatile than the broader market.

ASML has higher revenue and earnings than Teradyne. Teradyne is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than ASML, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Teradyne	$3.19B	17.80	$554.05M	$7.29	49.81
ASML	$36.95B	18.58	$10.87B	$32.14	54.31

Teradyne pays an annual dividend of $0.52 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.1%. ASML pays an annual dividend of $7.27 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.4%. Teradyne pays out 7.1% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. ASML pays out 22.6% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Teradyne has increased its dividend for 1 consecutive years.

ASML has a net margin of 30.11% compared to Teradyne's net margin of 25.77%. ASML's return on equity of 52.71% beat Teradyne's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Teradyne	25.77%	39.93%	27.67%
ASML	30.11%	52.71%	22.10%

In the previous week, Teradyne had 34 more articles in the media than ASML. MarketBeat recorded 61 mentions for Teradyne and 27 mentions for ASML. Teradyne's average media sentiment score of 1.40 beat ASML's score of 1.21 indicating that Teradyne is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Teradyne	48 Very Positive mention(s)	7 Positive mention(s)	3 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive
ASML	19 Very Positive mention(s)	1 Positive mention(s)	4 Neutral mention(s)	2 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive

Teradyne presently has a consensus target price of $396.80, suggesting a potential upside of 9.28%. ASML has a consensus target price of $1,970.33, suggesting a potential upside of 12.87%. Given ASML's higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe ASML is more favorable than Teradyne.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Teradyne	0 Sell rating(s)	4 Hold rating(s)	11 Buy rating(s)	1 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.81
ASML	3 Sell rating(s)	4 Hold rating(s)	21 Buy rating(s)	4 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.81

Summary

ASML beats Teradyne on 12 of the 19 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does ASML compare to Qnity Electronics?

ASML (NASDAQ:ASML) and Qnity Electronics (NYSE:Q) are both large-cap technology companies, but which is the better business? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their valuation, dividends, profitability, institutional ownership, risk, analyst recommendations, earnings and media sentiment.

ASML pays an annual dividend of $7.27 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.4%. Qnity Electronics pays an annual dividend of $0.32 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.3%. ASML pays out 22.6% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Qnity Electronics pays out 11.4% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years.

ASML presently has a consensus target price of $1,970.33, suggesting a potential upside of 12.87%. Qnity Electronics has a consensus target price of $151.78, suggesting a potential upside of 20.29%. Given Qnity Electronics' stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Qnity Electronics is more favorable than ASML.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
ASML	3 Sell rating(s)	4 Hold rating(s)	21 Buy rating(s)	4 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.81
Qnity Electronics	0 Sell rating(s)	1 Hold rating(s)	8 Buy rating(s)	1 Strong Buy rating(s)	3.00

26.1% of ASML shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.2% of Qnity Electronics shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

In the previous week, ASML had 18 more articles in the media than Qnity Electronics. MarketBeat recorded 27 mentions for ASML and 9 mentions for Qnity Electronics. ASML's average media sentiment score of 1.21 beat Qnity Electronics' score of 0.72 indicating that ASML is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
ASML	19 Very Positive mention(s)	1 Positive mention(s)	4 Neutral mention(s)	2 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive
Qnity Electronics	3 Very Positive mention(s)	1 Positive mention(s)	5 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive

ASML has a net margin of 30.11% compared to Qnity Electronics' net margin of 11.25%. ASML's return on equity of 52.71% beat Qnity Electronics' return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
ASML	30.11%	52.71%	22.10%
Qnity Electronics	11.25%	10.83%	6.26%

ASML has higher revenue and earnings than Qnity Electronics. Qnity Electronics is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than ASML, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
ASML	$36.95B	18.58	$10.87B	$32.14	54.31
Qnity Electronics	$4.75B	5.55	$692M	$2.80	45.06

Summary

ASML beats Qnity Electronics on 14 of the 18 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get ASML News Delivered to You Automatically

Subscribe Now

SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding ASML and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of NASDAQ and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.

ASML vs. The Competition

Export

Metric	ASML	Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment Industry	Technology Sector	NASDAQ Exchange
Market Cap	$686.53B	$105.53B	$29.15B	$12.78B
Dividend Yield	0.42%	1.59%	2.75%	10.79%
P/E Ratio	54.31	77.14	72.13	24.16
Price / Sales	18.58	93.60	595.84	98.47
Price / Cash	56.89	62.00	48.39	53.12
Price / Book	27.06	10.06	9.31	6.23
Net Income	$10.87B	$1.85B	$676.02M	$348.07M
7 Day Performance	-0.35%	-2.00%	0.83%	0.72%
1 Month Performance	-0.65%	0.95%	4.47%	4.89%
1 Year Performance	128.73%	99.48%	188.44%	16.95%

ASML Competitors List

Export

Company	MarketRank	Share Price	Analysts' Price Target	1Y Price Performance	Market Cap	Revenue	P/E Ratio	Employee Count	Indicator(s)
ASML ASML	4.6156 of 5 stars	$1,745.64 +0.1%	$1,970.33 +12.9%	+131.2%	$686.53B	$36.95B	54.31	44,209	Positive News
LRCX Lam Research	4.6911 of 5 stars	$309.21 -5.7%	$358.47 +15.9%	+210.7%	$393.56B	$23.23B	54.60	23,300	Positive News Analyst Forecast
AMAT Applied Materials	4.9889 of 5 stars	$489.78 -4.8%	$643.50 +31.4%	+196.3%	$392.93B	$28.37B	42.66	36,500	Trending News Analyst Forecast
KLAC KLA	4.9454 of 5 stars	$186.29 -4.4%	$223.70 +20.1%	+108.4%	$247.78B	$13.58B	51.72	17,200
TER Teradyne	4.8608 of 5 stars	$375.01 -7.2%	$396.80 +5.8%	+213.0%	$59.95B	$3.19B	52.60	6,600	Trending News Dividend Announcement

Related Companies and Tools

Related Companies

Top 10 Stock Comparisons

This page (NASDAQ:ASML) was last updated on 8/26/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.

From Our Partners

Unlock superior investment research and tools.

Get MarketBeat All Access

In-depth profiles and analysis for 20,000 public companies.
Real-time analyst ratings, insider transactions, earnings data, and more.
Our daily ratings and market update email newsletter.

Sign In
Create Account

Your Email Address:

Your Password:

Forgot your password?

Your Email Address:

Choose a Password:

By creating a free account, you agree to our terms of service. This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

ASML (ASML) Competitors