Carrier Global Competitors

Sony Group (NYSE:SONY) and Carrier Global (NYSE:CARR) are both large-cap computer and technology companies, but which is the better business? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their institutional ownership, valuation, dividends, earnings, analyst recommendations, profitability and risk.

Valuation & Earnings

This table compares Sony Group and Carrier Global's top-line revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

Carrier Global has higher revenue and earnings than Sony Group.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a summary of recent ratings for Sony Group and Carrier Global, as reported by MarketBeat.com.

Carrier Global has a consensus target price of $39.9231, suggesting a potential downside of 8.12%. Given Carrier Global's higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Carrier Global is more favorable than Sony Group.

Profitability

This table compares Sony Group and Carrier Global's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Insider & Institutional Ownership

83.0% of Carrier Global shares are held by institutional investors. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Dividends

Sony Group pays an annual dividend of $0.41 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.4%. Carrier Global pays an annual dividend of $0.48 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.1%. Carrier Global has increased its dividend for 28 consecutive years. Carrier Global is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

Summary

Carrier Global beats Sony Group on 9 of the 9 factors compared between the two stocks.

Carrier Global (NYSE:CARR) and Square (NYSE:SQ) are both large-cap computer and technology companies, but which is the superior stock? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their institutional ownership, valuation, risk, profitability, dividends, earnings and analyst recommendations.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a breakdown of recent ratings and price targets for Carrier Global and Square, as reported by MarketBeat.com.

Carrier Global currently has a consensus price target of $39.9231, suggesting a potential downside of 8.12%. Square has a consensus price target of $223.5122, suggesting a potential downside of 15.24%. Given Carrier Global's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, equities research analysts clearly believe Carrier Global is more favorable than Square.

Profitability

This table compares Carrier Global and Square's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Earnings and Valuation

This table compares Carrier Global and Square's gross revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

Carrier Global has higher revenue and earnings than Square.

Insider and Institutional Ownership

83.0% of Carrier Global shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 64.0% of Square shares are held by institutional investors. 21.8% of Square shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Summary

Carrier Global beats Square on 8 of the 11 factors compared between the two stocks.

Applied Materials (NASDAQ:AMAT) and Carrier Global (NYSE:CARR) are both large-cap computer and technology companies, but which is the better investment? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their profitability, earnings, dividends, risk, valuation, analyst recommendations and institutional ownership.

Insider & Institutional Ownership

78.8% of Applied Materials shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 83.0% of Carrier Global shares are held by institutional investors. 0.4% of Applied Materials shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Dividends

Applied Materials pays an annual dividend of $0.88 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.7%. Carrier Global pays an annual dividend of $0.48 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.1%. Applied Materials pays out 21.1% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Applied Materials has increased its dividend for 3 consecutive years and Carrier Global has increased its dividend for 28 consecutive years. Carrier Global is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

Analyst Ratings

This is a summary of recent ratings and recommmendations for Applied Materials and Carrier Global, as provided by MarketBeat.

Applied Materials presently has a consensus target price of $143.3750, suggesting a potential upside of 5.94%. Carrier Global has a consensus target price of $39.9231, suggesting a potential downside of 8.12%. Given Applied Materials' stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Applied Materials is more favorable than Carrier Global.

Earnings and Valuation

This table compares Applied Materials and Carrier Global's revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

Applied Materials has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Carrier Global.

Profitability

This table compares Applied Materials and Carrier Global's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Summary

Applied Materials beats Carrier Global on 9 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

Carrier Global (NYSE:CARR) and International Business Machines (NYSE:IBM) are both large-cap computer and technology companies, but which is the superior stock? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their earnings, institutional ownership, risk, valuation, dividends, profitability and analyst recommendations.

Valuation and Earnings

This table compares Carrier Global and International Business Machines' revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

International Business Machines has higher revenue and earnings than Carrier Global.

Dividends

Carrier Global pays an annual dividend of $0.48 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.1%. International Business Machines pays an annual dividend of $6.52 per share and has a dividend yield of 4.9%. International Business Machines pays out 50.9% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Carrier Global has raised its dividend for 28 consecutive years and International Business Machines has raised its dividend for 21 consecutive years.

Analyst Ratings

This is a breakdown of recent recommendations and price targets for Carrier Global and International Business Machines, as provided by MarketBeat.

Carrier Global presently has a consensus target price of $39.9231, indicating a potential downside of 8.12%. International Business Machines has a consensus target price of $142.5455, indicating a potential upside of 7.77%. Given International Business Machines' higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe International Business Machines is more favorable than Carrier Global.

Profitability

This table compares Carrier Global and International Business Machines' net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Institutional and Insider Ownership

83.0% of Carrier Global shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 55.7% of International Business Machines shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.2% of International Business Machines shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Intuit (NASDAQ:INTU) and Carrier Global (NYSE:CARR) are both large-cap computer and technology companies, but which is the better business? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, profitability, institutional ownership, risk, dividends, valuation and earnings.

Analyst Ratings

This is a summary of recent ratings and recommmendations for Intuit and Carrier Global, as provided by MarketBeat.

Intuit currently has a consensus price target of $430.2381, indicating a potential upside of 3.53%. Carrier Global has a consensus price target of $39.9231, indicating a potential downside of 8.12%. Given Intuit's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Intuit is more favorable than Carrier Global.

Institutional and Insider Ownership

84.8% of Intuit shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 83.0% of Carrier Global shares are owned by institutional investors. 3.4% of Intuit shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Earnings and Valuation

This table compares Intuit and Carrier Global's top-line revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

Carrier Global has higher revenue and earnings than Intuit.

Dividends

Intuit pays an annual dividend of $2.36 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.6%. Carrier Global pays an annual dividend of $0.48 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.1%. Intuit pays out 36.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Intuit has raised its dividend for 9 consecutive years and Carrier Global has raised its dividend for 28 consecutive years. Carrier Global is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

Profitability

This table compares Intuit and Carrier Global's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Summary

Intuit beats Carrier Global on 9 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

Carrier Global (NYSE:CARR) and Uber Technologies (NYSE:UBER) are both large-cap computer and technology companies, but which is the superior stock? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their institutional ownership, earnings, profitability, risk, analyst recommendations, valuation and dividends.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a summary of recent ratings and price targets for Carrier Global and Uber Technologies, as provided by MarketBeat.

Carrier Global currently has a consensus price target of $39.9231, indicating a potential downside of 8.12%. Uber Technologies has a consensus price target of $63.3750, indicating a potential upside of 4.58%. Given Uber Technologies' stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Uber Technologies is more favorable than Carrier Global.

Institutional and Insider Ownership

83.0% of Carrier Global shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 70.6% of Uber Technologies shares are owned by institutional investors. 8.7% of Uber Technologies shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Earnings and Valuation

This table compares Carrier Global and Uber Technologies' revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

Carrier Global has higher revenue and earnings than Uber Technologies.

Profitability

This table compares Carrier Global and Uber Technologies' net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Summary

Carrier Global beats Uber Technologies on 6 of the 11 factors compared between the two stocks.