Go Pro

Carrier Global (CARR) Competitors

Carrier Global logo
$53.86 -0.53 (-0.97%)
Closing price 09/18/2026 03:59 PM Eastern
Extended Trading
$54.49 +0.62 (+1.16%)
As of 09/18/2026 07:57 PM Eastern
Extended trading is trading that happens on electronic markets outside of regular trading hours. This is a fair market value extended hours price provided by Massive. Learn more.

CARR vs. DOV, EXP, IR, ITT, and JCI

Should you buy Carrier Global stock or one of its competitors? Carrier Global's main competitors and comparable companies include Dover (DOV), Eagle Materials (EXP), Ingersoll Rand (IR), ITT (ITT), and Johnson Controls International (JCI). Companies are selected based on similarities in market, industry, and size.

How does Carrier Global compare to Dover?

Carrier Global (NYSE:CARR) and Dover (NYSE:DOV) are both large-cap industrials companies, but which is the superior stock? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their media sentiment, earnings, analyst recommendations, institutional ownership, dividends, risk, valuation and profitability.

In the previous week, Carrier Global had 6 more articles in the media than Dover. MarketBeat recorded 11 mentions for Carrier Global and 5 mentions for Dover. Dover's average media sentiment score of 1.12 beat Carrier Global's score of 1.10 indicating that Dover is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Carrier Global
7 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
3 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
Dover
3 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
2 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

Carrier Global has a beta of 1.3, indicating that its stock price is 30% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Dover has a beta of 1.15, indicating that its stock price is 15% more volatile than the broader market.

91.0% of Carrier Global shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 84.5% of Dover shares are held by institutional investors. 6.5% of Carrier Global shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 1.1% of Dover shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Carrier Global presently has a consensus target price of $73.60, indicating a potential upside of 36.64%. Dover has a consensus target price of $238.29, indicating a potential upside of 27.07%. Given Carrier Global's higher possible upside, research analysts plainly believe Carrier Global is more favorable than Dover.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Carrier Global
0 Sell rating(s)
9 Hold rating(s)
11 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.62
Dover
0 Sell rating(s)
5 Hold rating(s)
10 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.67

Carrier Global has higher revenue and earnings than Dover. Dover is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Carrier Global, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Carrier Global$21.75B2.04$1.48B$1.4437.41
Dover$8.09B3.12$1.09B$8.3022.59

Carrier Global pays an annual dividend of $0.96 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.8%. Dover pays an annual dividend of $2.10 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.1%. Carrier Global pays out 66.7% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Dover pays out 25.3% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Carrier Global has increased its dividend for 4 consecutive years and Dover has increased its dividend for 70 consecutive years.

Dover has a net margin of 13.48% compared to Carrier Global's net margin of 5.52%. Dover's return on equity of 18.32% beat Carrier Global's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Carrier Global5.52% 14.68% 5.51%
Dover 13.48%18.32%10.26%

Summary

Carrier Global beats Dover on 11 of the 20 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Carrier Global compare to Eagle Materials?

Carrier Global (NYSE:CARR) and Eagle Materials (NYSE:EXP) are related companies, but which is the better stock? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their risk, analyst recommendations, dividends, institutional ownership, earnings, media sentiment, valuation and profitability.

Carrier Global has a beta of 1.3, meaning that its share price is 30% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Eagle Materials has a beta of 1.36, meaning that its share price is 36% more volatile than the broader market.

Carrier Global has higher revenue and earnings than Eagle Materials. Eagle Materials is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Carrier Global, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Carrier Global$21.75B2.04$1.48B$1.4437.41
Eagle Materials$2.31B2.35$423.81M$12.6513.97

Eagle Materials has a net margin of 17.32% compared to Carrier Global's net margin of 5.52%. Eagle Materials' return on equity of 26.87% beat Carrier Global's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Carrier Global5.52% 14.68% 5.51%
Eagle Materials 17.32%26.87%10.73%

In the previous week, Carrier Global had 4 more articles in the media than Eagle Materials. MarketBeat recorded 11 mentions for Carrier Global and 7 mentions for Eagle Materials. Carrier Global's average media sentiment score of 1.10 beat Eagle Materials' score of 0.20 indicating that Carrier Global is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Carrier Global
7 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
3 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
Eagle Materials
1 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
3 Neutral mention(s)
1 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral

91.0% of Carrier Global shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 96.1% of Eagle Materials shares are owned by institutional investors. 6.5% of Carrier Global shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 1.7% of Eagle Materials shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Carrier Global presently has a consensus target price of $73.60, indicating a potential upside of 36.64%. Eagle Materials has a consensus target price of $218.33, indicating a potential upside of 23.51%. Given Carrier Global's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Carrier Global is more favorable than Eagle Materials.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Carrier Global
0 Sell rating(s)
9 Hold rating(s)
11 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.62
Eagle Materials
1 Sell rating(s)
9 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
1.90

Carrier Global pays an annual dividend of $0.96 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.8%. Eagle Materials pays an annual dividend of $1.00 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.6%. Carrier Global pays out 66.7% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Eagle Materials pays out 7.9% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Carrier Global has increased its dividend for 4 consecutive years. Carrier Global is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

Summary

Carrier Global beats Eagle Materials on 12 of the 20 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Carrier Global compare to Ingersoll Rand?

Carrier Global (NYSE:CARR) and Ingersoll Rand (NYSE:IR) are both large-cap industrials companies, but which is the superior business? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, valuation, earnings, profitability, media sentiment, institutional ownership, risk and dividends.

In the previous week, Carrier Global had 7 more articles in the media than Ingersoll Rand. MarketBeat recorded 11 mentions for Carrier Global and 4 mentions for Ingersoll Rand. Carrier Global's average media sentiment score of 1.10 beat Ingersoll Rand's score of 0.68 indicating that Carrier Global is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Carrier Global
7 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
3 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
Ingersoll Rand
2 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
2 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

91.0% of Carrier Global shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 95.3% of Ingersoll Rand shares are held by institutional investors. 6.5% of Carrier Global shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.5% of Ingersoll Rand shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Carrier Global has a beta of 1.3, meaning that its share price is 30% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Ingersoll Rand has a beta of 1.15, meaning that its share price is 15% more volatile than the broader market.

Ingersoll Rand has a net margin of 12.08% compared to Carrier Global's net margin of 5.52%. Carrier Global's return on equity of 14.68% beat Ingersoll Rand's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Carrier Global5.52% 14.68% 5.51%
Ingersoll Rand 12.08%12.90%7.22%

Carrier Global pays an annual dividend of $0.96 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.8%. Ingersoll Rand pays an annual dividend of $0.08 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.1%. Carrier Global pays out 66.7% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Ingersoll Rand pays out 3.3% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Carrier Global has increased its dividend for 4 consecutive years. Carrier Global is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

Carrier Global has higher revenue and earnings than Ingersoll Rand. Ingersoll Rand is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Carrier Global, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Carrier Global$21.75B2.04$1.48B$1.4437.41
Ingersoll Rand$7.65B3.64$581.40M$2.4329.57

Carrier Global currently has a consensus target price of $73.60, indicating a potential upside of 36.64%. Ingersoll Rand has a consensus target price of $96.14, indicating a potential upside of 33.82%. Given Carrier Global's higher probable upside, equities analysts plainly believe Carrier Global is more favorable than Ingersoll Rand.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Carrier Global
0 Sell rating(s)
9 Hold rating(s)
11 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.62
Ingersoll Rand
0 Sell rating(s)
3 Hold rating(s)
5 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.63

Summary

Carrier Global beats Ingersoll Rand on 13 of the 20 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Carrier Global compare to ITT?

Carrier Global (NYSE:CARR) and ITT (NYSE:ITT) are both large-cap industrials companies, but which is the superior investment? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their dividends, profitability, analyst recommendations, institutional ownership, earnings, valuation, risk and media sentiment.

Carrier Global presently has a consensus price target of $73.60, suggesting a potential upside of 36.64%. ITT has a consensus price target of $252.60, suggesting a potential upside of 23.28%. Given Carrier Global's higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Carrier Global is more favorable than ITT.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Carrier Global
0 Sell rating(s)
9 Hold rating(s)
11 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.62
ITT
0 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
9 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.90

Carrier Global has higher revenue and earnings than ITT. Carrier Global is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than ITT, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Carrier Global$21.75B2.04$1.48B$1.4437.41
ITT$3.94B4.65$488M$5.1040.18

ITT has a net margin of 8.90% compared to Carrier Global's net margin of 5.52%. ITT's return on equity of 15.90% beat Carrier Global's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Carrier Global5.52% 14.68% 5.51%
ITT 8.90%15.90%7.74%

Carrier Global has a beta of 1.3, meaning that its stock price is 30% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, ITT has a beta of 1.27, meaning that its stock price is 27% more volatile than the broader market.

Carrier Global pays an annual dividend of $0.96 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.8%. ITT pays an annual dividend of $1.54 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.8%. Carrier Global pays out 66.7% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. ITT pays out 30.2% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Carrier Global has raised its dividend for 4 consecutive years and ITT has raised its dividend for 10 consecutive years.

In the previous week, Carrier Global had 3 more articles in the media than ITT. MarketBeat recorded 11 mentions for Carrier Global and 8 mentions for ITT. Carrier Global's average media sentiment score of 1.10 beat ITT's score of 1.01 indicating that Carrier Global is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Carrier Global
7 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
3 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
ITT
4 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
2 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

91.0% of Carrier Global shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 91.6% of ITT shares are held by institutional investors. 6.5% of Carrier Global shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.9% of ITT shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Summary

Carrier Global and ITT tied by winning 10 of the 20 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Carrier Global compare to Johnson Controls International?

Carrier Global (NYSE:CARR) and Johnson Controls International (NYSE:JCI) are both large-cap industrials companies, but which is the superior investment? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, profitability, risk, institutional ownership, dividends, media sentiment, valuation and earnings.

91.0% of Carrier Global shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 90.1% of Johnson Controls International shares are held by institutional investors. 6.5% of Carrier Global shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.3% of Johnson Controls International shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Carrier Global presently has a consensus target price of $73.60, suggesting a potential upside of 36.64%. Johnson Controls International has a consensus target price of $155.75, suggesting a potential upside of 8.68%. Given Carrier Global's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, research analysts clearly believe Carrier Global is more favorable than Johnson Controls International.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Carrier Global
0 Sell rating(s)
9 Hold rating(s)
11 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.62
Johnson Controls International
1 Sell rating(s)
10 Hold rating(s)
12 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.48

Johnson Controls International has a net margin of 14.32% compared to Carrier Global's net margin of 5.52%. Johnson Controls International's return on equity of 22.11% beat Carrier Global's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Carrier Global5.52% 14.68% 5.51%
Johnson Controls International 14.32%22.11%7.69%

Johnson Controls International has higher revenue and earnings than Carrier Global. Johnson Controls International is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Carrier Global, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Carrier Global$21.75B2.04$1.48B$1.4437.41
Johnson Controls International$23.60B3.68$3.29B$5.7524.92

Carrier Global pays an annual dividend of $0.96 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.8%. Johnson Controls International pays an annual dividend of $1.60 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.1%. Carrier Global pays out 66.7% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Johnson Controls International pays out 27.8% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Carrier Global has increased its dividend for 4 consecutive years and Johnson Controls International has increased its dividend for 4 consecutive years.

In the previous week, Carrier Global had 2 more articles in the media than Johnson Controls International. MarketBeat recorded 11 mentions for Carrier Global and 9 mentions for Johnson Controls International. Carrier Global's average media sentiment score of 1.10 beat Johnson Controls International's score of 1.03 indicating that Carrier Global is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Carrier Global
7 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
3 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
Johnson Controls International
4 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
4 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

Carrier Global has a beta of 1.3, suggesting that its share price is 30% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Johnson Controls International has a beta of 1.29, suggesting that its share price is 29% more volatile than the broader market.

Summary

Carrier Global beats Johnson Controls International on 10 of the 19 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Carrier Global News Delivered to You Automatically

Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for CARR and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.

Subscribe Now
SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding CARR and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.
Skip Chart

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of NYSE and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Skip Chart

CARR vs. The Competition

MetricCarrier GlobalBuilding Products IndustryIndustrials SectorNYSE Exchange
Market Cap$44.41B$8.05B$10.21B$23.10B
Dividend Yield1.78%2.20%97.05%3.62%
P/E Ratio37.4147.3025.5228.21
Price / Sales2.0418.26281.5520.34
Price / Cash12.8514.4723.8136.36
Price / Book3.197.034.804.67
Net Income$1.48B$4.88B$614.67M$1.07B
7 Day Performance-6.28%-2.65%1.21%-1.64%
1 Month Performance-10.40%-6.76%-2.57%-3.60%
1 Year Performance-10.80%-6.77%4.34%8.41%

Carrier Global Competitors List

CompanyMarketRankShare PriceAnalysts' Price Target1Y Price PerformanceMarket CapRevenueP/E RatioEmployee CountIndicator(s)
CARR
Carrier Global
4.6286 of 5 stars
$53.87
-1.0%
$73.60
+36.6%
-10.8%$44.41B$21.75B37.4147,000
DOV
Dover
4.699 of 5 stars
$189.27
+0.1%
$238.29
+25.9%
+9.5%$25.47B$8.42B22.8024,000
EXP
Eagle Materials
3.888 of 5 stars
$182.18
-0.3%
$218.33
+19.8%
-23.5%$5.60B$2.32B14.402,800
IR
Ingersoll Rand
4.7454 of 5 stars
$71.94
-0.3%
$96.14
+33.6%
-12.1%$27.99B$7.94B29.6021,000
ITT
ITT
4.7791 of 5 stars
$197.75
-0.9%
$252.60
+27.7%
+13.0%$17.84B$3.94B38.7811,600

Related Companies and Tools


This page (NYSE:CARR) was last updated on 9/20/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.
From Our Partners