Free Trial

Carrier Global (CARR) Competitors

Carrier Global logo
$55.55 -0.28 (-0.50%)
Closing price 10/9/2026 03:59 PM Eastern
Extended Trading
$55.56 +0.01 (+0.02%)
As of 10/9/2026 07:35 PM Eastern
Extended trading is trading that happens on electronic markets outside of regular trading hours. This is a fair market value extended hours price provided by Massive. Learn more.

CARR vs. DOV, EXP, IR, ITT, and JCI

Should you buy Carrier Global stock or one of its competitors? Carrier Global's main competitors and comparable companies include Dover (DOV), Eagle Materials (EXP), Ingersoll Rand (IR), ITT (ITT), and Johnson Controls International (JCI). Companies are selected based on similarities in market, industry, and size.

How does Carrier Global compare to Dover?

Dover (NYSE:DOV) and Carrier Global (NYSE:CARR) are both large-cap industrials companies, but which is the better business? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their valuation, institutional ownership, media sentiment, risk, dividends, analyst recommendations, profitability and earnings.

Dover has a net margin of 13.48% compared to Carrier Global's net margin of 5.52%. Dover's return on equity of 18.32% beat Carrier Global's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Dover13.48% 18.32% 10.26%
Carrier Global 5.52%14.68%5.51%

Dover presently has a consensus target price of $238.21, suggesting a potential upside of 26.26%. Carrier Global has a consensus target price of $71.93, suggesting a potential upside of 29.49%. Given Carrier Global's higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Carrier Global is more favorable than Dover.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Dover
0 Sell rating(s)
5 Hold rating(s)
10 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.67
Carrier Global
0 Sell rating(s)
9 Hold rating(s)
12 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.57

84.5% of Dover shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 91.0% of Carrier Global shares are owned by institutional investors. 1.1% of Dover shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 6.5% of Carrier Global shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Dover pays an annual dividend of $2.10 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.1%. Carrier Global pays an annual dividend of $0.96 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.7%. Dover pays out 25.3% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Carrier Global pays out 66.7% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Dover has raised its dividend for 70 consecutive years and Carrier Global has raised its dividend for 4 consecutive years.

Dover has a beta of 1.13, meaning that its share price is 13% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Carrier Global has a beta of 1.29, meaning that its share price is 29% more volatile than the broader market.

Carrier Global has higher revenue and earnings than Dover. Dover is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Carrier Global, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Dover$8.42B3.02$1.09B$8.3022.73
Carrier Global$21.75B2.11$1.48B$1.4438.58

In the previous week, Carrier Global had 11 more articles in the media than Dover. MarketBeat recorded 18 mentions for Carrier Global and 7 mentions for Dover. Dover's average media sentiment score of 0.91 beat Carrier Global's score of 0.28 indicating that Dover is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Dover
4 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
2 Neutral mention(s)
1 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
Carrier Global
5 Very Positive mention(s)
3 Positive mention(s)
5 Neutral mention(s)
1 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral

Summary

Carrier Global beats Dover on 10 of the 19 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Carrier Global compare to Eagle Materials?

Eagle Materials (NYSE:EXP) and Carrier Global (NYSE:CARR) are related companies, but which is the better stock? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their earnings, valuation, profitability, analyst recommendations, institutional ownership, risk, media sentiment and dividends.

Eagle Materials has a beta of 1.33, suggesting that its share price is 33% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Carrier Global has a beta of 1.29, suggesting that its share price is 29% more volatile than the broader market.

Eagle Materials has a net margin of 17.32% compared to Carrier Global's net margin of 5.52%. Eagle Materials' return on equity of 26.87% beat Carrier Global's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Eagle Materials17.32% 26.87% 10.73%
Carrier Global 5.52%14.68%5.51%

Eagle Materials currently has a consensus price target of $202.33, indicating a potential upside of 22.79%. Carrier Global has a consensus price target of $71.93, indicating a potential upside of 29.49%. Given Carrier Global's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Carrier Global is more favorable than Eagle Materials.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Eagle Materials
0 Sell rating(s)
10 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.00
Carrier Global
0 Sell rating(s)
9 Hold rating(s)
12 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.57

Carrier Global has higher revenue and earnings than Eagle Materials. Eagle Materials is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Carrier Global, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Eagle Materials$2.32B2.17$423.81M$12.6513.03
Carrier Global$21.75B2.11$1.48B$1.4438.58

96.1% of Eagle Materials shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 91.0% of Carrier Global shares are owned by institutional investors. 1.7% of Eagle Materials shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 6.5% of Carrier Global shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

In the previous week, Carrier Global had 6 more articles in the media than Eagle Materials. MarketBeat recorded 18 mentions for Carrier Global and 12 mentions for Eagle Materials. Carrier Global's average media sentiment score of 0.28 beat Eagle Materials' score of -0.23 indicating that Carrier Global is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Eagle Materials
1 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
6 Neutral mention(s)
4 Negative mention(s)
1 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral
Carrier Global
5 Very Positive mention(s)
3 Positive mention(s)
5 Neutral mention(s)
1 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral

Eagle Materials pays an annual dividend of $1.00 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.6%. Carrier Global pays an annual dividend of $0.96 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.7%. Eagle Materials pays out 7.9% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Carrier Global pays out 66.7% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Carrier Global has increased its dividend for 4 consecutive years. Carrier Global is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

Summary

Carrier Global beats Eagle Materials on 11 of the 19 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Carrier Global compare to Ingersoll Rand?

Ingersoll Rand (NYSE:IR) and Carrier Global (NYSE:CARR) are both large-cap industrials companies, but which is the better stock? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their profitability, dividends, media sentiment, risk, institutional ownership, valuation, earnings and analyst recommendations.

Ingersoll Rand presently has a consensus price target of $96.14, suggesting a potential upside of 22.05%. Carrier Global has a consensus price target of $71.93, suggesting a potential upside of 29.49%. Given Carrier Global's higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Carrier Global is more favorable than Ingersoll Rand.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Ingersoll Rand
0 Sell rating(s)
3 Hold rating(s)
5 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.63
Carrier Global
0 Sell rating(s)
9 Hold rating(s)
12 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.57

Ingersoll Rand has a beta of 1.15, suggesting that its stock price is 15% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Carrier Global has a beta of 1.29, suggesting that its stock price is 29% more volatile than the broader market.

Ingersoll Rand has a net margin of 12.08% compared to Carrier Global's net margin of 5.52%. Carrier Global's return on equity of 14.68% beat Ingersoll Rand's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Ingersoll Rand12.08% 12.90% 7.22%
Carrier Global 5.52%14.68%5.51%

95.3% of Ingersoll Rand shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 91.0% of Carrier Global shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.5% of Ingersoll Rand shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 6.5% of Carrier Global shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

In the previous week, Carrier Global had 7 more articles in the media than Ingersoll Rand. MarketBeat recorded 18 mentions for Carrier Global and 11 mentions for Ingersoll Rand. Ingersoll Rand's average media sentiment score of 0.93 beat Carrier Global's score of 0.28 indicating that Ingersoll Rand is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Ingersoll Rand
3 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
2 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
Carrier Global
5 Very Positive mention(s)
3 Positive mention(s)
5 Neutral mention(s)
1 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral

Ingersoll Rand pays an annual dividend of $0.08 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.1%. Carrier Global pays an annual dividend of $0.96 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.7%. Ingersoll Rand pays out 3.3% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Carrier Global pays out 66.7% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Carrier Global has raised its dividend for 4 consecutive years. Carrier Global is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

Carrier Global has higher revenue and earnings than Ingersoll Rand. Ingersoll Rand is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Carrier Global, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Ingersoll Rand$7.65B3.99$581.40M$2.4332.42
Carrier Global$21.75B2.11$1.48B$1.4438.58

Summary

Carrier Global beats Ingersoll Rand on 11 of the 19 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Carrier Global compare to ITT?

ITT (NYSE:ITT) and Carrier Global (NYSE:CARR) are both large-cap industrials companies, but which is the superior investment? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their profitability, earnings, valuation, media sentiment, analyst recommendations, dividends, risk and institutional ownership.

ITT presently has a consensus price target of $259.56, indicating a potential upside of 28.81%. Carrier Global has a consensus price target of $71.93, indicating a potential upside of 29.49%. Given Carrier Global's higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Carrier Global is more favorable than ITT.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
ITT
0 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
8 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.89
Carrier Global
0 Sell rating(s)
9 Hold rating(s)
12 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.57

Carrier Global has higher revenue and earnings than ITT. Carrier Global is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than ITT, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
ITT$3.94B4.57$488M$5.1039.51
Carrier Global$21.75B2.11$1.48B$1.4438.58

ITT has a net margin of 8.90% compared to Carrier Global's net margin of 5.52%. ITT's return on equity of 15.90% beat Carrier Global's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
ITT8.90% 15.90% 7.74%
Carrier Global 5.52%14.68%5.51%

91.6% of ITT shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 91.0% of Carrier Global shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.9% of ITT shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 6.5% of Carrier Global shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

In the previous week, Carrier Global had 14 more articles in the media than ITT. MarketBeat recorded 18 mentions for Carrier Global and 4 mentions for ITT. ITT's average media sentiment score of 0.69 beat Carrier Global's score of 0.28 indicating that ITT is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
ITT
2 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
2 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
Carrier Global
5 Very Positive mention(s)
3 Positive mention(s)
5 Neutral mention(s)
1 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral

ITT has a beta of 1.25, suggesting that its share price is 25% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Carrier Global has a beta of 1.29, suggesting that its share price is 29% more volatile than the broader market.

ITT pays an annual dividend of $1.54 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.8%. Carrier Global pays an annual dividend of $0.96 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.7%. ITT pays out 30.2% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Carrier Global pays out 66.7% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. ITT has increased its dividend for 10 consecutive years and Carrier Global has increased its dividend for 4 consecutive years.

Summary

ITT beats Carrier Global on 11 of the 19 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Carrier Global compare to Johnson Controls International?

Carrier Global (NYSE:CARR) and Johnson Controls International (NYSE:JCI) are both large-cap industrials companies, but which is the better business? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their risk, analyst recommendations, earnings, institutional ownership, valuation, dividends, profitability and media sentiment.

Carrier Global pays an annual dividend of $0.96 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.7%. Johnson Controls International pays an annual dividend of $1.60 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.0%. Carrier Global pays out 66.7% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Johnson Controls International pays out 27.8% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Carrier Global has increased its dividend for 4 consecutive years and Johnson Controls International has increased its dividend for 4 consecutive years.

91.0% of Carrier Global shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 90.1% of Johnson Controls International shares are held by institutional investors. 6.5% of Carrier Global shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 0.3% of Johnson Controls International shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Johnson Controls International has a net margin of 14.32% compared to Carrier Global's net margin of 5.52%. Johnson Controls International's return on equity of 22.11% beat Carrier Global's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Carrier Global5.52% 14.68% 5.51%
Johnson Controls International 14.32%22.11%7.69%

Carrier Global currently has a consensus target price of $71.93, suggesting a potential upside of 29.49%. Johnson Controls International has a consensus target price of $161.05, suggesting a potential upside of 2.30%. Given Carrier Global's higher probable upside, equities analysts plainly believe Carrier Global is more favorable than Johnson Controls International.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Carrier Global
0 Sell rating(s)
9 Hold rating(s)
12 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.57
Johnson Controls International
1 Sell rating(s)
9 Hold rating(s)
13 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.58

Carrier Global has a beta of 1.29, indicating that its share price is 29% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Johnson Controls International has a beta of 1.27, indicating that its share price is 27% more volatile than the broader market.

Johnson Controls International has higher revenue and earnings than Carrier Global. Johnson Controls International is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Carrier Global, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Carrier Global$21.75B2.11$1.48B$1.4438.58
Johnson Controls International$25.00B3.82$3.29B$5.7527.38

In the previous week, Carrier Global had 13 more articles in the media than Johnson Controls International. MarketBeat recorded 18 mentions for Carrier Global and 5 mentions for Johnson Controls International. Johnson Controls International's average media sentiment score of 0.35 beat Carrier Global's score of 0.28 indicating that Johnson Controls International is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Carrier Global
5 Very Positive mention(s)
3 Positive mention(s)
5 Neutral mention(s)
1 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral
Johnson Controls International
2 Very Positive mention(s)
2 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral

Summary

Johnson Controls International beats Carrier Global on 12 of the 19 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Carrier Global News Delivered to You Automatically

Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for CARR and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.

Subscribe Now
SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding CARR and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.
Skip Chart

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of NYSE and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Skip Chart

CARR vs. The Competition

MetricCarrier GlobalBuilding Products IndustryIndustrials SectorNYSE Exchange
Market Cap$46.02B$8.18B$10.13B$22.94B
Dividend Yield1.72%2.16%96.64%3.72%
P/E Ratio38.5847.0526.6728.60
Price / Sales2.1118.67267.9715.13
Price / Cash13.3214.3523.8337.72
Price / Book3.297.074.774.72
Net Income$1.48B$4.88B$615.96M$1.07B
7 Day Performance0.75%-1.26%-1.12%0.35%
1 Month Performance-1.74%-2.61%-2.21%-2.93%
1 Year Performance-1.90%-4.16%3.20%9.26%

Carrier Global Competitors List

CompanyMarketRankShare PriceAnalysts' Price Target1Y Price PerformanceMarket CapRevenueP/E RatioEmployee CountIndicator(s)
CARR
Carrier Global
4.5174 of 5 stars
$55.55
-0.5%
$71.93
+29.5%
-4.4%$46.02B$21.75B38.5847,000
DOV
Dover
4.8831 of 5 stars
$191.64
+0.2%
$238.21
+24.3%
+16.4%$25.76B$8.42B23.0924,000
EXP
Eagle Materials
4.0681 of 5 stars
$171.24
+0.8%
$212.78
+24.3%
-29.6%$5.21B$2.32B13.542,800
IR
Ingersoll Rand
4.6408 of 5 stars
$79.19
+0.8%
$96.14
+21.4%
+0.4%$30.48B$7.94B32.5921,000
ITT
ITT
4.8668 of 5 stars
$207.23
+0.5%
$259.56
+25.2%
+16.8%$18.43B$3.94B40.6311,600

Related Companies and Tools


This page (NYSE:CARR) was last updated on 10/10/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.
From Our Partners