Moog (MOG.B) Competitors

L3Harris Technologies has higher revenue and earnings than Moog. L3Harris Technologies is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Moog, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

L3Harris Technologies has a beta of 0.5, suggesting that its stock price is 50% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Moog has a beta of 0.75, suggesting that its stock price is 25% less volatile than the broader market.

Moog has a net margin of 8.73% compared to L3Harris Technologies' net margin of 8.17%. Moog's return on equity of 17.67% beat L3Harris Technologies' return on equity.

In the previous week, L3Harris Technologies had 10 more articles in the media than Moog. MarketBeat recorded 14 mentions for L3Harris Technologies and 4 mentions for Moog. L3Harris Technologies' average media sentiment score of 0.41 beat Moog's score of 0.00 indicating that L3Harris Technologies is being referred to more favorably in the media.

L3Harris Technologies pays an annual dividend of $5.00 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.1%. Moog pays an annual dividend of $1.20 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.3%. L3Harris Technologies pays out 50.5% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Moog pays out 10.2% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. L3Harris Technologies has raised its dividend for 24 consecutive years. L3Harris Technologies is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

L3Harris Technologies presently has a consensus target price of $355.92, indicating a potential upside of 50.32%. Given L3Harris Technologies' stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, equities analysts clearly believe L3Harris Technologies is more favorable than Moog.

84.8% of L3Harris Technologies shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 8.1% of Moog shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.7% of L3Harris Technologies shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 2.4% of Moog shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Moog has a net margin of 8.73% compared to Rocket Lab's net margin of -21.51%. Moog's return on equity of 17.67% beat Rocket Lab's return on equity.

Moog has a beta of 0.75, indicating that its stock price is 25% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Rocket Lab has a beta of 2.93, indicating that its stock price is 193% more volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, Rocket Lab had 73 more articles in the media than Moog. MarketBeat recorded 77 mentions for Rocket Lab and 4 mentions for Moog. Rocket Lab's average media sentiment score of 0.70 beat Moog's score of 0.00 indicating that Rocket Lab is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

8.1% of Moog shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 71.8% of Rocket Lab shares are held by institutional investors. 2.4% of Moog shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 8.4% of Rocket Lab shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Moog has higher revenue and earnings than Rocket Lab. Rocket Lab is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Moog, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Rocket Lab has a consensus price target of $106.14, suggesting a potential upside of 55.18%. Given Rocket Lab's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Rocket Lab is more favorable than Moog.

Heico has a net margin of 16.38% compared to Moog's net margin of 8.73%. Heico's return on equity of 18.00% beat Moog's return on equity.

In the previous week, Heico had 2 more articles in the media than Moog. MarketBeat recorded 6 mentions for Heico and 4 mentions for Moog. Heico's average media sentiment score of 0.44 beat Moog's score of 0.00 indicating that Heico is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Heico pays an annual dividend of $0.26 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.1%. Moog pays an annual dividend of $1.20 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.3%. Heico pays out 4.3% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Moog pays out 10.2% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Heico has increased its dividend for 17 consecutive years.

Heico has higher revenue and earnings than Moog. Moog is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Heico, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Heico presently has a consensus price target of $391.07, suggesting a potential upside of 32.15%. Given Heico's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, research analysts plainly believe Heico is more favorable than Moog.

Heico has a beta of 1.09, suggesting that its share price is 9% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Moog has a beta of 0.75, suggesting that its share price is 25% less volatile than the broader market.

27.1% of Heico shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 8.1% of Moog shares are owned by institutional investors. 4.9% of Heico shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 2.4% of Moog shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Moog has a net margin of 8.73% compared to Axon Enterprise's net margin of 6.19%. Moog's return on equity of 17.67% beat Axon Enterprise's return on equity.

In the previous week, Axon Enterprise had 13 more articles in the media than Moog. MarketBeat recorded 17 mentions for Axon Enterprise and 4 mentions for Moog. Axon Enterprise's average media sentiment score of 0.96 beat Moog's score of 0.00 indicating that Axon Enterprise is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Axon Enterprise has a consensus target price of $721.57, indicating a potential upside of 72.91%. Given Axon Enterprise's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Axon Enterprise is more favorable than Moog.

Moog has a beta of 0.75, suggesting that its share price is 25% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Axon Enterprise has a beta of 1.44, suggesting that its share price is 44% more volatile than the broader market.

Moog has higher revenue and earnings than Axon Enterprise. Moog is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Axon Enterprise, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

8.1% of Moog shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 79.1% of Axon Enterprise shares are held by institutional investors. 2.4% of Moog shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 4.2% of Axon Enterprise shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.