ESAB (ESAB) Competitors

ESAB has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Middleby. Middleby is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than ESAB, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

ESAB has a beta of 1.19, indicating that its stock price is 19% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Middleby has a beta of 1.36, indicating that its stock price is 36% more volatile than the broader market.

ESAB currently has a consensus price target of $138.38, suggesting a potential upside of 42.47%. Middleby has a consensus price target of $191.63, suggesting a potential upside of 13.45%. Given ESAB's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe ESAB is more favorable than Middleby.

ESAB has a net margin of 7.11% compared to Middleby's net margin of -11.46%. Middleby's return on equity of 15.94% beat ESAB's return on equity.

91.1% of ESAB shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 98.6% of Middleby shares are held by institutional investors. 7.2% of ESAB shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 9.7% of Middleby shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

In the previous week, Middleby had 4 more articles in the media than ESAB. MarketBeat recorded 5 mentions for Middleby and 1 mentions for ESAB. Middleby's average media sentiment score of 0.81 beat ESAB's score of 0.33 indicating that Middleby is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

62.5% of CRH shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 91.1% of ESAB shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.1% of CRH shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 7.2% of ESAB shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

CRH has a beta of 1.31, indicating that its stock price is 31% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, ESAB has a beta of 1.19, indicating that its stock price is 19% more volatile than the broader market.

CRH has higher revenue and earnings than ESAB. CRH is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than ESAB, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CRH pays an annual dividend of $1.56 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.4%. ESAB pays an annual dividend of $0.40 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.4%. CRH pays out 28.9% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. ESAB pays out 11.8% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. ESAB has raised its dividend for 3 consecutive years.

CRH presently has a consensus price target of $139.54, indicating a potential upside of 24.49%. ESAB has a consensus price target of $138.38, indicating a potential upside of 42.47%. Given ESAB's higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe ESAB is more favorable than CRH.

CRH has a net margin of 9.65% compared to ESAB's net margin of 7.11%. CRH's return on equity of 15.37% beat ESAB's return on equity.

In the previous week, CRH had 17 more articles in the media than ESAB. MarketBeat recorded 18 mentions for CRH and 1 mentions for ESAB. CRH's average media sentiment score of 0.63 beat ESAB's score of 0.33 indicating that CRH is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Dover has a net margin of 13.30% compared to ESAB's net margin of 7.11%. Dover's return on equity of 18.01% beat ESAB's return on equity.

91.1% of ESAB shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 84.5% of Dover shares are owned by institutional investors. 7.2% of ESAB shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 1.1% of Dover shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

In the previous week, ESAB and ESAB both had 1 articles in the media. Dover's average media sentiment score of 0.59 beat ESAB's score of 0.33 indicating that Dover is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

ESAB pays an annual dividend of $0.40 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.4%. Dover pays an annual dividend of $2.08 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.9%. ESAB pays out 11.8% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Dover pays out 25.9% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. ESAB has raised its dividend for 3 consecutive years and Dover has raised its dividend for 70 consecutive years. Dover is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

ESAB currently has a consensus price target of $138.38, suggesting a potential upside of 42.47%. Dover has a consensus price target of $239.85, suggesting a potential upside of 7.02%. Given ESAB's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, equities research analysts plainly believe ESAB is more favorable than Dover.

Dover has higher revenue and earnings than ESAB. Dover is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than ESAB, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

ESAB has a beta of 1.19, suggesting that its share price is 19% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Dover has a beta of 1.17, suggesting that its share price is 17% more volatile than the broader market.

Eagle Materials has a net margin of 18.36% compared to ESAB's net margin of 7.11%. Eagle Materials' return on equity of 28.27% beat ESAB's return on equity.

ESAB pays an annual dividend of $0.40 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.4%. Eagle Materials pays an annual dividend of $1.00 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.4%. ESAB pays out 11.8% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Eagle Materials pays out 7.6% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. ESAB has raised its dividend for 3 consecutive years. Eagle Materials is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

ESAB currently has a consensus price target of $138.38, indicating a potential upside of 42.47%. Eagle Materials has a consensus price target of $224.30, indicating a potential downside of 3.94%. Given ESAB's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, research analysts plainly believe ESAB is more favorable than Eagle Materials.

91.1% of ESAB shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 96.1% of Eagle Materials shares are owned by institutional investors. 7.2% of ESAB shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 1.7% of Eagle Materials shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

In the previous week, ESAB had 1 more articles in the media than Eagle Materials. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for ESAB and 0 mentions for Eagle Materials. Eagle Materials' average media sentiment score of 1.00 beat ESAB's score of 0.33 indicating that Eagle Materials is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Eagle Materials has lower revenue, but higher earnings than ESAB. Eagle Materials is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than ESAB, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

ESAB has a beta of 1.19, suggesting that its stock price is 19% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Eagle Materials has a beta of 1.37, suggesting that its stock price is 37% more volatile than the broader market.