NYSE:FIX

Comfort Systems USA Competitors

$79.61
+0.32 (+0.40 %)
(As of 04/12/2021 12:37 PM ET)
Add
Compare
Today's Range
$79.38
Now: $79.61
$80.01
50-Day Range
$59.64
MA: $70.72
$77.21
52-Week Range
$27.54
Now: $79.61
$79.43
Volume1,989 shs
Average Volume244,139 shs
Market Capitalization$2.88 billion
P/E Ratio20.73
Dividend Yield0.58%
Beta1.05

Competitors

Comfort Systems USA (NYSE:FIX) Vs. PWR, ACM, MTZ, EME, KBR, and FLR

Should you be buying FIX stock or one of its competitors? Companies in the sub-industry of "construction & engineering" are considered alternatives and competitors to Comfort Systems USA, including Quanta Services (PWR), AECOM (ACM), MasTec (MTZ), EMCOR Group (EME), KBR (KBR), and Fluor (FLR).

Comfort Systems USA (NYSE:FIX) and Quanta Services (NYSE:PWR) are both construction companies, but which is the better stock? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their valuation, dividends, risk, profitability, analyst recommendations, earnings and institutional ownership.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a summary of recent recommendations for Comfort Systems USA and Quanta Services, as provided by MarketBeat.com.

Sell RatingsHold RatingsBuy RatingsStrong Buy RatingsRating Score
Comfort Systems USA12001.67
Quanta Services03702.70

Comfort Systems USA presently has a consensus target price of $42.50, suggesting a potential downside of 46.81%. Quanta Services has a consensus target price of $73.70, suggesting a potential downside of 21.25%. Given Quanta Services' stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Quanta Services is more favorable than Comfort Systems USA.

Risk and Volatility

Comfort Systems USA has a beta of 1.05, indicating that its share price is 5% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Quanta Services has a beta of 1.24, indicating that its share price is 24% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Valuation and Earnings

This table compares Comfort Systems USA and Quanta Services' top-line revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

Gross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Comfort Systems USA$2.62 billion1.10$114.32 million$3.0026.54
Quanta Services$12.11 billion1.07$402.04 million$3.0530.65

Quanta Services has higher revenue and earnings than Comfort Systems USA. Comfort Systems USA is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Quanta Services, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Profitability

This table compares Comfort Systems USA and Quanta Services' net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Net MarginsReturn on EquityReturn on Assets
Comfort Systems USA4.91%21.36%8.16%
Quanta Services3.45%11.61%5.61%

Dividends

Comfort Systems USA pays an annual dividend of $0.46 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.6%. Quanta Services pays an annual dividend of $0.24 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.3%. Comfort Systems USA pays out 15.3% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Quanta Services pays out 7.9% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Comfort Systems USA has increased its dividend for 8 consecutive years and Quanta Services has increased its dividend for 1 consecutive years. Comfort Systems USA is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

Insider and Institutional Ownership

91.5% of Comfort Systems USA shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 86.5% of Quanta Services shares are held by institutional investors. 3.2% of Comfort Systems USA shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 1.4% of Quanta Services shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Summary

Quanta Services beats Comfort Systems USA on 9 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

AECOM (NYSE:ACM) and Comfort Systems USA (NYSE:FIX) are both mid-cap construction companies, but which is the superior business? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their institutional ownership, earnings, analyst recommendations, valuation, dividends, risk and profitability.

Analyst Ratings

This is a summary of recent ratings and recommmendations for AECOM and Comfort Systems USA, as provided by MarketBeat.com.

Sell RatingsHold RatingsBuy RatingsStrong Buy RatingsRating Score
AECOM01602.86
Comfort Systems USA12001.67

AECOM presently has a consensus target price of $57.5556, indicating a potential downside of 13.58%. Comfort Systems USA has a consensus target price of $42.50, indicating a potential downside of 46.81%. Given AECOM's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, research analysts plainly believe AECOM is more favorable than Comfort Systems USA.

Risk & Volatility

AECOM has a beta of 1.61, indicating that its stock price is 61% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Comfort Systems USA has a beta of 1.05, indicating that its stock price is 5% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Earnings and Valuation

This table compares AECOM and Comfort Systems USA's top-line revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

Gross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
AECOM$13.24 billion0.74$-186,370,000.00$2.1531.03
Comfort Systems USA$2.62 billion1.10$114.32 million$3.0026.54

Comfort Systems USA has lower revenue, but higher earnings than AECOM. Comfort Systems USA is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than AECOM, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Profitability

This table compares AECOM and Comfort Systems USA's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Net MarginsReturn on EquityReturn on Assets
AECOM-1.41%9.37%2.55%
Comfort Systems USA4.91%21.36%8.16%

Institutional and Insider Ownership

88.8% of AECOM shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 91.5% of Comfort Systems USA shares are owned by institutional investors. 4.9% of AECOM shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 3.2% of Comfort Systems USA shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Summary

Comfort Systems USA beats AECOM on 8 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

MasTec (NYSE:MTZ) and Comfort Systems USA (NYSE:FIX) are both mid-cap construction companies, but which is the superior business? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their institutional ownership, earnings, analyst recommendations, valuation, dividends, risk and profitability.

Analyst Ratings

This is a summary of recent ratings and recommmendations for MasTec and Comfort Systems USA, as provided by MarketBeat.com.

Sell RatingsHold RatingsBuy RatingsStrong Buy RatingsRating Score
MasTec001003.00
Comfort Systems USA12001.67

MasTec presently has a consensus target price of $77.3636, indicating a potential downside of 22.63%. Comfort Systems USA has a consensus target price of $42.50, indicating a potential downside of 46.81%. Given MasTec's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, research analysts plainly believe MasTec is more favorable than Comfort Systems USA.

Risk & Volatility

MasTec has a beta of 1.38, indicating that its stock price is 38% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Comfort Systems USA has a beta of 1.05, indicating that its stock price is 5% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Earnings and Valuation

This table compares MasTec and Comfort Systems USA's top-line revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

Gross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
MasTec$7.18 billion1.03$392.33 million$5.0919.68
Comfort Systems USA$2.62 billion1.10$114.32 million$3.0026.54

MasTec has higher revenue and earnings than Comfort Systems USA. MasTec is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Comfort Systems USA, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Profitability

This table compares MasTec and Comfort Systems USA's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Net MarginsReturn on EquityReturn on Assets
MasTec4.86%18.75%6.64%
Comfort Systems USA4.91%21.36%8.16%

Institutional and Insider Ownership

82.5% of MasTec shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 91.5% of Comfort Systems USA shares are owned by institutional investors. 23.9% of MasTec shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 3.2% of Comfort Systems USA shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Summary

MasTec beats Comfort Systems USA on 9 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

EMCOR Group (NYSE:EME) and Comfort Systems USA (NYSE:FIX) are both mid-cap construction companies, but which is the superior business? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their institutional ownership, earnings, analyst recommendations, valuation, dividends, risk and profitability.

Analyst Ratings

This is a summary of recent ratings and recommmendations for EMCOR Group and Comfort Systems USA, as provided by MarketBeat.com.

Sell RatingsHold RatingsBuy RatingsStrong Buy RatingsRating Score
EMCOR Group03002.00
Comfort Systems USA12001.67

EMCOR Group presently has a consensus target price of $84.00, indicating a potential downside of 29.09%. Comfort Systems USA has a consensus target price of $42.50, indicating a potential downside of 46.81%. Given EMCOR Group's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, research analysts plainly believe EMCOR Group is more favorable than Comfort Systems USA.

Risk & Volatility

EMCOR Group has a beta of 1.18, indicating that its stock price is 18% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Comfort Systems USA has a beta of 1.05, indicating that its stock price is 5% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Earnings & Valuation

This table compares EMCOR Group and Comfort Systems USA's top-line revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

Gross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
EMCOR Group$9.17 billion0.71$325.14 million$5.7520.64
Comfort Systems USA$2.62 billion1.10$114.32 million$3.0026.54

EMCOR Group has higher revenue and earnings than Comfort Systems USA. EMCOR Group is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Comfort Systems USA, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Profitability

This table compares EMCOR Group and Comfort Systems USA's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Net MarginsReturn on EquityReturn on Assets
EMCOR Group1.57%16.86%7.10%
Comfort Systems USA4.91%21.36%8.16%

Dividends

EMCOR Group pays an annual dividend of $0.52 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.4%. Comfort Systems USA pays an annual dividend of $0.46 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.6%. EMCOR Group pays out 9.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Comfort Systems USA pays out 15.3% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. EMCOR Group has raised its dividend for 1 consecutive years and Comfort Systems USA has raised its dividend for 8 consecutive years. Comfort Systems USA is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

Institutional and Insider Ownership

93.3% of EMCOR Group shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 91.5% of Comfort Systems USA shares are owned by institutional investors. 1.9% of EMCOR Group shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 3.2% of Comfort Systems USA shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Summary

EMCOR Group beats Comfort Systems USA on 9 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

KBR (NYSE:KBR) and Comfort Systems USA (NYSE:FIX) are both mid-cap construction companies, but which is the superior business? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their institutional ownership, earnings, analyst recommendations, valuation, dividends, risk and profitability.

Risk & Volatility

KBR has a beta of 1.39, indicating that its stock price is 39% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Comfort Systems USA has a beta of 1.05, indicating that its stock price is 5% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Institutional and Insider Ownership

98.2% of KBR shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 91.5% of Comfort Systems USA shares are owned by institutional investors. 1.0% of KBR shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 3.2% of Comfort Systems USA shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Dividends

KBR pays an annual dividend of $0.44 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.1%. Comfort Systems USA pays an annual dividend of $0.46 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.6%. KBR pays out 26.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Comfort Systems USA pays out 15.3% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. KBR has raised its dividend for 1 consecutive years and Comfort Systems USA has raised its dividend for 8 consecutive years.

Earnings & Valuation

This table compares KBR and Comfort Systems USA's top-line revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

Gross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
KBR$5.64 billion0.98$202 million$1.6923.15
Comfort Systems USA$2.62 billion1.10$114.32 million$3.0026.54

KBR has higher revenue and earnings than Comfort Systems USA. KBR is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Comfort Systems USA, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Analyst Ratings

This is a summary of recent ratings and recommmendations for KBR and Comfort Systems USA, as provided by MarketBeat.com.

Sell RatingsHold RatingsBuy RatingsStrong Buy RatingsRating Score
KBR01902.90
Comfort Systems USA12001.67

KBR presently has a consensus target price of $35.00, indicating a potential downside of 10.03%. Comfort Systems USA has a consensus target price of $42.50, indicating a potential downside of 46.81%. Given KBR's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, research analysts plainly believe KBR is more favorable than Comfort Systems USA.

Profitability

This table compares KBR and Comfort Systems USA's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Net MarginsReturn on EquityReturn on Assets
KBR-0.57%13.98%4.62%
Comfort Systems USA4.91%21.36%8.16%

Summary

Comfort Systems USA beats KBR on 9 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

Fluor (NYSE:FLR) and Comfort Systems USA (NYSE:FIX) are both mid-cap construction companies, but which is the better business? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their institutional ownership, earnings, analyst recommendations, risk, profitability, dividends and valuation.

Risk & Volatility

Fluor has a beta of 2.85, indicating that its share price is 185% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Comfort Systems USA has a beta of 1.05, indicating that its share price is 5% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Institutional & Insider Ownership

64.6% of Fluor shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 91.5% of Comfort Systems USA shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.8% of Fluor shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 3.2% of Comfort Systems USA shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Earnings & Valuation

This table compares Fluor and Comfort Systems USA's gross revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

Gross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Fluor$14.35 billion0.22$-1,522,160,000.00$2.997.58
Comfort Systems USA$2.62 billion1.10$114.32 million$3.0026.54

Comfort Systems USA has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Fluor. Fluor is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Comfort Systems USA, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a breakdown of recent ratings for Fluor and Comfort Systems USA, as provided by MarketBeat.

Sell RatingsHold RatingsBuy RatingsStrong Buy RatingsRating Score
Fluor04102.20
Comfort Systems USA12001.67

Fluor presently has a consensus target price of $15.50, indicating a potential downside of 31.54%. Comfort Systems USA has a consensus target price of $42.50, indicating a potential downside of 46.81%. Given Fluor's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Fluor is more favorable than Comfort Systems USA.

Profitability

This table compares Fluor and Comfort Systems USA's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Net MarginsReturn on EquityReturn on Assets
Fluor-3.63%10.56%1.89%
Comfort Systems USA4.91%21.36%8.16%

Summary

Comfort Systems USA beats Fluor on 9 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.


Comfort Systems USA Competitors List

Competitor NameCompetitor BTM RankCompetitor PriceCompetitor Price ChangeCompetitor Market CapCompetitor RevenueCompetitor P/E RatioCompetitor Indicator(s)
Quanta Services logo
PWR
Quanta Services
1.9$93.48+0.3%$12.97 billion$12.11 billion34.49
AECOM logo
ACM
AECOM
1.5$66.71+0.6%$9.79 billion$13.24 billion-56.53
MasTec logo
MTZ
MasTec
1.4$100.18+0.6%$7.39 billion$7.18 billion23.97
EMCOR Group logo
EME
EMCOR Group
1.3$118.70+1.4%$6.41 billion$9.17 billion47.86Dividend Announcement
KBR logo
KBR
KBR
1.8$39.12+1.6%$5.43 billion$5.64 billion-156.48
Fluor logo
FLR
Fluor
1.3$22.66+0.4%$3.20 billion$14.35 billion-5.60
Dycom Industries logo
DY
Dycom Industries
1.6$96.26+1.1%$2.98 billion$3.34 billion117.39Analyst Revision
Ameresco logo
AMRC
Ameresco
2.0$48.82+1.6%$2.52 billion$866.93 million44.79Analyst Revision
Granite Construction logo
GVA
Granite Construction
1.2$39.34+0.1%$1.80 billion$3.32 billion0.00
Primoris Services logo
PRIM
Primoris Services
1.8$34.29+1.1%$1.71 billion$3.11 billion16.89
MYR Group logo
MYRG
MYR Group
1.3$74.14+2.1%$1.27 billion$2.07 billion23.39
Great Lakes Dredge & Dock logo
GLDD
Great Lakes Dredge & Dock
1.5$15.14+1.8%$1.01 billion$711.52 million13.76
Tutor Perini logo
TPC
Tutor Perini
1.6$18.08+0.1%$921.54 million$4.45 billion-64.57
Aegion logo
AEGN
Aegion
1.3$28.56+0.4%$874.55 million$1.21 billion-21.47
Argan logo
AGX
Argan
1.5$54.09+1.0%$840.36 million$239 million120.20Upcoming Earnings
Sterling Construction logo
STRL
Sterling Construction
1.3$21.76+1.9%$610.30 million$1.13 billion10.41Analyst Downgrade
Northwest Pipe logo
NWPX
Northwest Pipe
1.3$32.61+1.2%$323.76 million$279.32 million12.45
Orion Group logo
ORN
Orion Group
1.4$5.92+0.7%$179.11 million$708.39 million10.57Gap Down
Hill International logo
HIL
Hill International
0.8$3.04+1.6%$171.70 million$376.44 million27.64
This page was last updated on 4/12/2021 by MarketBeat.com Staff
MarketBeat - Stock Market News and Research Tools logo

MarketBeat empowers individual investors to make better trading decisions by providing real-time financial data and objective market analysis. Whether you’re looking for analyst ratings, corporate buybacks, dividends, earnings, economic reports, financials, insider trades, IPOs, SEC filings or stock splits, MarketBeat has the objective information you need to analyze any stock. Learn more.

MarketBeat is accredited by the Better Business Bureau

© American Consumer News, LLC dba MarketBeat® 2010-2021. All rights reserved.
326 E 8th St #105, Sioux Falls, SD 57103 | U.S. Based Support Team at [email protected] | (844) 978-6257
MarketBeat does not provide personalized financial advice and does not issue recommendations or offers to buy stock or sell any security. Learn more.

Our Accessibility Statement | Terms of Service | Do Not Sell My Information

© 2021 Market data provided is at least 10-minutes delayed and hosted by Barchart Solutions. Information is provided 'as-is' and solely for informational purposes, not for trading purposes or advice, and is delayed. To see all exchange delays and terms of use please see disclaimer. Fundamental company data provided by Zacks Investment Research. As a bonus to opt-ing into our email newsletters, you will also get a free subscription to the Liberty Through Wealth e-newsletter. You can opt out at any time.