AECOM Competitors

AECOM (NYSE:ACM) and Jacobs Engineering Group (NYSE:JEC) are both construction companies, but which is the better investment? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their profitability, institutional ownership, earnings, risk, analyst recommendations, valuation and dividends.

Valuation and Earnings

This table compares AECOM and Jacobs Engineering Group's gross revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

Jacobs Engineering Group has lower revenue, but higher earnings than AECOM. Jacobs Engineering Group is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than AECOM, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Profitability

This table compares AECOM and Jacobs Engineering Group's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Insider and Institutional Ownership

88.8% of AECOM shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 90.6% of Jacobs Engineering Group shares are owned by institutional investors. 4.9% of AECOM shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 1.0% of Jacobs Engineering Group shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Risk & Volatility

AECOM has a beta of 1.61, meaning that its stock price is 61% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Jacobs Engineering Group has a beta of 1.35, meaning that its stock price is 35% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a summary of current recommendations and price targets for AECOM and Jacobs Engineering Group, as provided by MarketBeat.

AECOM presently has a consensus price target of $55.3333, suggesting a potential upside of 3.08%. Given AECOM's higher possible upside, research analysts plainly believe AECOM is more favorable than Jacobs Engineering Group.

Summary

Jacobs Engineering Group beats AECOM on 8 of the 13 factors compared between the two stocks.

AECOM (NYSE:ACM) and Quanta Services (NYSE:PWR) are both construction companies, but which is the better investment? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their profitability, institutional ownership, earnings, risk, analyst recommendations, valuation and dividends.

Valuation and Earnings

This table compares AECOM and Quanta Services' gross revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

Quanta Services has lower revenue, but higher earnings than AECOM. AECOM is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Quanta Services, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Profitability

This table compares AECOM and Quanta Services' net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Insider and Institutional Ownership

88.8% of AECOM shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 86.5% of Quanta Services shares are owned by institutional investors. 4.9% of AECOM shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 1.4% of Quanta Services shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Risk & Volatility

AECOM has a beta of 1.61, meaning that its stock price is 61% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Quanta Services has a beta of 1.24, meaning that its stock price is 24% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a summary of current recommendations and price targets for AECOM and Quanta Services, as provided by MarketBeat.

AECOM presently has a consensus price target of $55.3333, suggesting a potential upside of 3.08%. Quanta Services has a consensus price target of $65.6364, suggesting a potential downside of 15.48%. Given AECOM's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, research analysts plainly believe AECOM is more favorable than Quanta Services.

Summary

Quanta Services beats AECOM on 8 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

AECOM (NYSE:ACM) and MasTec (NYSE:MTZ) are both mid-cap construction companies, but which is the better investment? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their profitability, institutional ownership, earnings, risk, analyst recommendations, valuation and dividends.

Valuation and Earnings

This table compares AECOM and MasTec's gross revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

MasTec has lower revenue, but higher earnings than AECOM. MasTec is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than AECOM, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Profitability

This table compares AECOM and MasTec's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Insider and Institutional Ownership

88.8% of AECOM shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 82.5% of MasTec shares are owned by institutional investors. 4.9% of AECOM shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 23.9% of MasTec shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Risk & Volatility

AECOM has a beta of 1.61, meaning that its stock price is 61% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, MasTec has a beta of 1.38, meaning that its stock price is 38% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a summary of current recommendations and price targets for AECOM and MasTec, as provided by MarketBeat.

AECOM presently has a consensus price target of $55.3333, suggesting a potential upside of 3.08%. MasTec has a consensus price target of $66.6667, suggesting a potential downside of 19.00%. Given AECOM's higher possible upside, research analysts plainly believe AECOM is more favorable than MasTec.

Summary

MasTec beats AECOM on 10 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

AECOM (NYSE:ACM) and EMCOR Group (NYSE:EME) are both mid-cap construction companies, but which is the better investment? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their profitability, institutional ownership, earnings, risk, analyst recommendations, valuation and dividends.

Valuation and Earnings

This table compares AECOM and EMCOR Group's gross revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

EMCOR Group has lower revenue, but higher earnings than AECOM. EMCOR Group is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than AECOM, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Profitability

This table compares AECOM and EMCOR Group's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Insider and Institutional Ownership

88.8% of AECOM shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 93.3% of EMCOR Group shares are owned by institutional investors. 4.9% of AECOM shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 1.9% of EMCOR Group shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Risk & Volatility

AECOM has a beta of 1.61, meaning that its stock price is 61% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, EMCOR Group has a beta of 1.18, meaning that its stock price is 18% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a summary of current recommendations and price targets for AECOM and EMCOR Group, as provided by MarketBeat.

AECOM presently has a consensus price target of $55.3333, suggesting a potential upside of 3.08%. EMCOR Group has a consensus price target of $84.00, suggesting a potential downside of 13.64%. Given AECOM's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, research analysts plainly believe AECOM is more favorable than EMCOR Group.

AECOM (NYSE:ACM) and KBR (NYSE:KBR) are both mid-cap construction companies, but which is the better investment? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their profitability, institutional ownership, earnings, risk, analyst recommendations, valuation and dividends.

Valuation and Earnings

This table compares AECOM and KBR's gross revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

KBR has lower revenue, but higher earnings than AECOM. KBR is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than AECOM, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Profitability

This table compares AECOM and KBR's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Insider and Institutional Ownership

88.8% of AECOM shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 98.2% of KBR shares are owned by institutional investors. 4.9% of AECOM shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 1.0% of KBR shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Risk & Volatility

AECOM has a beta of 1.61, meaning that its stock price is 61% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, KBR has a beta of 1.39, meaning that its stock price is 39% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a summary of current recommendations and price targets for AECOM and KBR, as provided by MarketBeat.

AECOM presently has a consensus price target of $55.3333, suggesting a potential upside of 3.08%. KBR has a consensus price target of $32.7273, suggesting a potential upside of 6.85%. Given KBR's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe KBR is more favorable than AECOM.

Summary

KBR beats AECOM on 9 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

AECOM (NYSE:ACM) and Fluor (NYSE:FLR) are both mid-cap construction companies, but which is the better investment? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their profitability, institutional ownership, earnings, risk, analyst recommendations, valuation and dividends.

Valuation and Earnings

This table compares AECOM and Fluor's gross revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

AECOM has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Fluor. Fluor is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than AECOM, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Profitability

This table compares AECOM and Fluor's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Insider and Institutional Ownership

88.8% of AECOM shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 64.6% of Fluor shares are owned by institutional investors. 4.9% of AECOM shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 0.8% of Fluor shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Risk & Volatility

AECOM has a beta of 1.61, meaning that its stock price is 61% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Fluor has a beta of 2.85, meaning that its stock price is 185% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a summary of current recommendations and price targets for AECOM and Fluor, as provided by MarketBeat.

AECOM presently has a consensus price target of $55.3333, suggesting a potential upside of 3.08%. Fluor has a consensus price target of $13.3333, suggesting a potential downside of 34.80%. Given AECOM's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, research analysts plainly believe AECOM is more favorable than Fluor.

Summary

AECOM beats Fluor on 9 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.