KBR Competitors

KBR (NYSE:KBR) and Quanta Services (NYSE:PWR) are both construction companies, but which is the superior investment? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their institutional ownership, dividends, analyst recommendations, earnings, risk, profitability and valuation.

Institutional & Insider Ownership

98.2% of KBR shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 86.5% of Quanta Services shares are held by institutional investors. 1.0% of KBR shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 1.4% of Quanta Services shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Valuation & Earnings

This table compares KBR and Quanta Services' top-line revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

Quanta Services has higher revenue and earnings than KBR. KBR is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Quanta Services, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Profitability

This table compares KBR and Quanta Services' net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Analyst Ratings

This is a breakdown of recent recommendations and price targets for KBR and Quanta Services, as reported by MarketBeat.

KBR presently has a consensus target price of $37.0769, indicating a potential downside of 8.32%. Quanta Services has a consensus target price of $76.20, indicating a potential downside of 21.46%. Given KBR's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, equities analysts plainly believe KBR is more favorable than Quanta Services.

Volatility and Risk

KBR has a beta of 1.39, meaning that its share price is 39% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Quanta Services has a beta of 1.24, meaning that its share price is 24% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Dividends

KBR pays an annual dividend of $0.44 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.1%. Quanta Services pays an annual dividend of $0.24 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.2%. KBR pays out 26.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Quanta Services pays out 7.9% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. KBR has increased its dividend for 1 consecutive years and Quanta Services has increased its dividend for 1 consecutive years.

Summary

Quanta Services beats KBR on 9 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

AECOM (NYSE:ACM) and KBR (NYSE:KBR) are both mid-cap construction companies, but which is the superior stock? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their profitability, institutional ownership, earnings, risk, dividends, valuation and analyst recommendations.

Valuation & Earnings

This table compares AECOM and KBR's gross revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

KBR has lower revenue, but higher earnings than AECOM. KBR is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than AECOM, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a summary of recent recommendations for AECOM and KBR, as provided by MarketBeat.com.

AECOM currently has a consensus price target of $62.8889, indicating a potential downside of 6.21%. KBR has a consensus price target of $37.0769, indicating a potential downside of 8.32%. Given AECOM's higher probable upside, equities research analysts plainly believe AECOM is more favorable than KBR.

Institutional and Insider Ownership

88.8% of AECOM shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 98.2% of KBR shares are held by institutional investors. 4.9% of AECOM shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 1.0% of KBR shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Volatility & Risk

AECOM has a beta of 1.61, suggesting that its share price is 61% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, KBR has a beta of 1.39, suggesting that its share price is 39% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Profitability

This table compares AECOM and KBR's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Summary

KBR beats AECOM on 8 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

KBR (NYSE:KBR) and MasTec (NYSE:MTZ) are both mid-cap construction companies, but which is the superior investment? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their earnings, dividends, valuation, analyst recommendations, institutional ownership, risk and profitability.

Earnings and Valuation

This table compares KBR and MasTec's top-line revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

MasTec has higher revenue and earnings than KBR. MasTec is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than KBR, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Institutional & Insider Ownership

98.2% of KBR shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 82.5% of MasTec shares are held by institutional investors. 1.0% of KBR shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 23.9% of MasTec shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a breakdown of current recommendations for KBR and MasTec, as reported by MarketBeat.

KBR currently has a consensus price target of $37.0769, suggesting a potential downside of 8.32%. MasTec has a consensus price target of $82.5833, suggesting a potential downside of 18.65%. Given KBR's higher possible upside, research analysts clearly believe KBR is more favorable than MasTec.

Risk & Volatility

KBR has a beta of 1.39, indicating that its stock price is 39% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, MasTec has a beta of 1.38, indicating that its stock price is 38% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Profitability

This table compares KBR and MasTec's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Summary

MasTec beats KBR on 11 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

KBR (NYSE:KBR) and EMCOR Group (NYSE:EME) are both mid-cap construction companies, but which is the superior investment? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their earnings, risk, dividends, profitability, analyst recommendations, institutional ownership and valuation.

Profitability

This table compares KBR and EMCOR Group's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Analyst Ratings

This is a breakdown of current recommendations and price targets for KBR and EMCOR Group, as reported by MarketBeat.

KBR currently has a consensus price target of $37.0769, suggesting a potential downside of 8.32%. EMCOR Group has a consensus price target of $96.00, suggesting a potential downside of 20.71%. Given KBR's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, equities analysts plainly believe KBR is more favorable than EMCOR Group.

Earnings & Valuation

This table compares KBR and EMCOR Group's gross revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

EMCOR Group has higher revenue and earnings than KBR. EMCOR Group is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than KBR, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Insider & Institutional Ownership

98.2% of KBR shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 93.3% of EMCOR Group shares are held by institutional investors. 1.0% of KBR shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 1.9% of EMCOR Group shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Volatility & Risk

KBR has a beta of 1.39, meaning that its stock price is 39% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, EMCOR Group has a beta of 1.18, meaning that its stock price is 18% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Dividends

KBR pays an annual dividend of $0.44 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.1%. EMCOR Group pays an annual dividend of $0.52 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.4%. KBR pays out 26.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. EMCOR Group pays out 9.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. KBR has raised its dividend for 1 consecutive years and EMCOR Group has raised its dividend for 1 consecutive years.

Summary

EMCOR Group beats KBR on 9 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

Fluor (NYSE:FLR) and KBR (NYSE:KBR) are both mid-cap construction companies, but which is the better business? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their earnings, risk, valuation, profitability, analyst recommendations, institutional ownership and dividends.

Profitability

This table compares Fluor and KBR's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a breakdown of current ratings and target prices for Fluor and KBR, as reported by MarketBeat.com.

Fluor presently has a consensus target price of $16.75, suggesting a potential downside of 22.92%. KBR has a consensus target price of $37.0769, suggesting a potential downside of 8.32%. Given KBR's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe KBR is more favorable than Fluor.

Valuation & Earnings

This table compares Fluor and KBR's gross revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

KBR has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Fluor. Fluor is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than KBR, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Institutional & Insider Ownership

64.6% of Fluor shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 98.2% of KBR shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.8% of Fluor shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 1.0% of KBR shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Risk and Volatility

Fluor has a beta of 2.85, indicating that its share price is 185% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, KBR has a beta of 1.39, indicating that its share price is 39% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Summary

KBR beats Fluor on 10 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

KBR (NYSE:KBR) and Dycom Industries (NYSE:DY) are both mid-cap construction companies, but which is the superior business? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, earnings, institutional ownership, valuation, dividends, risk and profitability.

Valuation and Earnings

This table compares KBR and Dycom Industries' gross revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

KBR has higher revenue and earnings than Dycom Industries. KBR is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Dycom Industries, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Risk & Volatility

KBR has a beta of 1.39, indicating that its stock price is 39% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Dycom Industries has a beta of 1.62, indicating that its stock price is 62% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a breakdown of current recommendations for KBR and Dycom Industries, as provided by MarketBeat.

KBR currently has a consensus price target of $37.0769, suggesting a potential downside of 8.32%. Dycom Industries has a consensus price target of $98.00, suggesting a potential upside of 1.21%. Given Dycom Industries' higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Dycom Industries is more favorable than KBR.

Profitability

This table compares KBR and Dycom Industries' net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Insider and Institutional Ownership

98.2% of KBR shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 94.9% of Dycom Industries shares are owned by institutional investors. 1.0% of KBR shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 5.7% of Dycom Industries shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Summary

KBR beats Dycom Industries on 8 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.