NASDAQ:STRL

Sterling Construction Competitors

$20.83
-0.11 (-0.53 %)
(As of 04/16/2021 04:00 PM ET)
Add
Compare
Today's Range
$20.67
Now: $20.83
$21.27
50-Day Range
$19.57
MA: $21.84
$23.85
52-Week Range
$6.72
Now: $20.83
$24.49
Volume120,148 shs
Average Volume342,879 shs
Market Capitalization$595.72 million
P/E Ratio9.97
Dividend YieldN/A
Beta1.43

Competitors

Sterling Construction (NASDAQ:STRL) Vs. PWR, ACM, MTZ, EME, KBR, and FLR

Should you be buying STRL stock or one of its competitors? Companies in the sub-industry of "construction & engineering" are considered alternatives and competitors to Sterling Construction, including Quanta Services (PWR), AECOM (ACM), MasTec (MTZ), EMCOR Group (EME), KBR (KBR), and Fluor (FLR).

Quanta Services (NYSE:PWR) and Sterling Construction (NASDAQ:STRL) are both construction companies, but which is the superior stock? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, institutional ownership, dividends, profitability, valuation, risk and earnings.

Earnings & Valuation

This table compares Quanta Services and Sterling Construction's revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

Gross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Quanta Services$12.11 billion1.09$402.04 million$3.0531.38
Sterling Construction$1.13 billion0.53$39.90 million$0.9023.14

Quanta Services has higher revenue and earnings than Sterling Construction. Sterling Construction is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Quanta Services, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a summary of current recommendations and price targets for Quanta Services and Sterling Construction, as provided by MarketBeat.com.

Sell RatingsHold RatingsBuy RatingsStrong Buy RatingsRating Score
Quanta Services03702.70
Sterling Construction0000N/A

Quanta Services currently has a consensus price target of $73.70, suggesting a potential downside of 22.99%. Given Quanta Services' higher probable upside, equities analysts clearly believe Quanta Services is more favorable than Sterling Construction.

Insider and Institutional Ownership

86.5% of Quanta Services shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 81.8% of Sterling Construction shares are held by institutional investors. 1.4% of Quanta Services shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 2.1% of Sterling Construction shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Volatility and Risk

Quanta Services has a beta of 1.24, suggesting that its stock price is 24% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Sterling Construction has a beta of 1.43, suggesting that its stock price is 43% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Profitability

This table compares Quanta Services and Sterling Construction's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Net MarginsReturn on EquityReturn on Assets
Quanta Services3.45%11.61%5.61%
Sterling Construction4.12%18.54%4.38%

Summary

Quanta Services beats Sterling Construction on 9 of the 13 factors compared between the two stocks.

AECOM (NYSE:ACM) and Sterling Construction (NASDAQ:STRL) are both construction companies, but which is the superior investment? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their valuation, institutional ownership, dividends, analyst recommendations, profitability, risk and earnings.

Institutional & Insider Ownership

88.8% of AECOM shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 81.8% of Sterling Construction shares are owned by institutional investors. 4.9% of AECOM shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 2.1% of Sterling Construction shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Earnings and Valuation

This table compares AECOM and Sterling Construction's revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

Gross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
AECOM$13.24 billion0.75$-186,370,000.00$2.1531.19
Sterling Construction$1.13 billion0.53$39.90 million$0.9023.14

Sterling Construction has lower revenue, but higher earnings than AECOM. Sterling Construction is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than AECOM, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Analyst Ratings

This is a summary of recent ratings and target prices for AECOM and Sterling Construction, as reported by MarketBeat.

Sell RatingsHold RatingsBuy RatingsStrong Buy RatingsRating Score
AECOM01602.86
Sterling Construction0000N/A

AECOM presently has a consensus target price of $57.5556, suggesting a potential downside of 14.16%. Given AECOM's higher possible upside, research analysts clearly believe AECOM is more favorable than Sterling Construction.

Profitability

This table compares AECOM and Sterling Construction's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Net MarginsReturn on EquityReturn on Assets
AECOM-1.41%9.37%2.55%
Sterling Construction4.12%18.54%4.38%

Risk & Volatility

AECOM has a beta of 1.61, suggesting that its share price is 61% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Sterling Construction has a beta of 1.43, suggesting that its share price is 43% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Summary

AECOM beats Sterling Construction on 8 of the 13 factors compared between the two stocks.

Sterling Construction (NASDAQ:STRL) and MasTec (NYSE:MTZ) are both construction companies, but which is the superior business? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their institutional ownership, earnings, dividends, profitability, valuation, risk and analyst recommendations.

Analyst Ratings

This is a summary of recent ratings and price targets for Sterling Construction and MasTec, as reported by MarketBeat.

Sell RatingsHold RatingsBuy RatingsStrong Buy RatingsRating Score
Sterling Construction0000N/A
MasTec001003.00

MasTec has a consensus target price of $77.3636, indicating a potential downside of 23.89%. Given MasTec's higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe MasTec is more favorable than Sterling Construction.

Profitability

This table compares Sterling Construction and MasTec's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Net MarginsReturn on EquityReturn on Assets
Sterling Construction4.12%18.54%4.38%
MasTec4.86%18.75%6.64%

Risk and Volatility

Sterling Construction has a beta of 1.43, meaning that its stock price is 43% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, MasTec has a beta of 1.38, meaning that its stock price is 38% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Institutional and Insider Ownership

81.8% of Sterling Construction shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 82.5% of MasTec shares are held by institutional investors. 2.1% of Sterling Construction shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 23.9% of MasTec shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Valuation and Earnings

This table compares Sterling Construction and MasTec's top-line revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

Gross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Sterling Construction$1.13 billion0.53$39.90 million$0.9023.14
MasTec$7.18 billion1.05$392.33 million$5.0919.97

MasTec has higher revenue and earnings than Sterling Construction. MasTec is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Sterling Construction, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Summary

MasTec beats Sterling Construction on 12 of the 13 factors compared between the two stocks.

EMCOR Group (NYSE:EME) and Sterling Construction (NASDAQ:STRL) are both construction companies, but which is the superior business? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their earnings, valuation, profitability, analyst recommendations, institutional ownership, risk and dividends.

Risk and Volatility

EMCOR Group has a beta of 1.18, suggesting that its stock price is 18% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Sterling Construction has a beta of 1.43, suggesting that its stock price is 43% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Profitability

This table compares EMCOR Group and Sterling Construction's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Net MarginsReturn on EquityReturn on Assets
EMCOR Group1.57%16.86%7.10%
Sterling Construction4.12%18.54%4.38%

Insider and Institutional Ownership

93.3% of EMCOR Group shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 81.8% of Sterling Construction shares are owned by institutional investors. 1.9% of EMCOR Group shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 2.1% of Sterling Construction shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Valuation & Earnings

This table compares EMCOR Group and Sterling Construction's revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

Gross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
EMCOR Group$9.17 billion0.72$325.14 million$5.7520.86
Sterling Construction$1.13 billion0.53$39.90 million$0.9023.14

EMCOR Group has higher revenue and earnings than Sterling Construction. EMCOR Group is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Sterling Construction, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a summary of current recommendations for EMCOR Group and Sterling Construction, as provided by MarketBeat.com.

Sell RatingsHold RatingsBuy RatingsStrong Buy RatingsRating Score
EMCOR Group03002.00
Sterling Construction0000N/A

EMCOR Group currently has a consensus price target of $84.00, indicating a potential downside of 29.96%. Given EMCOR Group's higher possible upside, research analysts clearly believe EMCOR Group is more favorable than Sterling Construction.

Summary

EMCOR Group beats Sterling Construction on 8 of the 12 factors compared between the two stocks.

KBR (NYSE:KBR) and Sterling Construction (NASDAQ:STRL) are both construction companies, but which is the superior stock? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their earnings, risk, valuation, profitability, dividends, analyst recommendations and institutional ownership.

Earnings & Valuation

This table compares KBR and Sterling Construction's gross revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

Gross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
KBR$5.64 billion1.00$202 million$1.6923.59
Sterling Construction$1.13 billion0.53$39.90 million$0.9023.14

KBR has higher revenue and earnings than Sterling Construction. Sterling Construction is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than KBR, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a breakdown of recent recommendations and price targets for KBR and Sterling Construction, as provided by MarketBeat.

Sell RatingsHold RatingsBuy RatingsStrong Buy RatingsRating Score
KBR01802.89
Sterling Construction0000N/A

KBR presently has a consensus price target of $35.0833, suggesting a potential downside of 12.01%. Given KBR's higher probable upside, research analysts clearly believe KBR is more favorable than Sterling Construction.

Profitability

This table compares KBR and Sterling Construction's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Net MarginsReturn on EquityReturn on Assets
KBR-0.57%13.98%4.62%
Sterling Construction4.12%18.54%4.38%

Institutional & Insider Ownership

98.2% of KBR shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 81.8% of Sterling Construction shares are owned by institutional investors. 1.0% of KBR shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 2.1% of Sterling Construction shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Risk & Volatility

KBR has a beta of 1.39, meaning that its stock price is 39% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Sterling Construction has a beta of 1.43, meaning that its stock price is 43% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Summary

KBR beats Sterling Construction on 8 of the 13 factors compared between the two stocks.

Sterling Construction (NASDAQ:STRL) and Fluor (NYSE:FLR) are both construction companies, but which is the superior stock? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their institutional ownership, valuation, risk, profitability, dividends, earnings and analyst recommendations.

Earnings and Valuation

This table compares Sterling Construction and Fluor's gross revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

Gross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Sterling Construction$1.13 billion0.53$39.90 million$0.9023.14
Fluor$14.35 billion0.22$-1,522,160,000.00$2.997.51

Sterling Construction has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Fluor. Fluor is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Sterling Construction, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a breakdown of recent ratings and price targets for Sterling Construction and Fluor, as reported by MarketBeat.com.

Sell RatingsHold RatingsBuy RatingsStrong Buy RatingsRating Score
Sterling Construction0000N/A
Fluor04102.20

Fluor has a consensus price target of $15.50, suggesting a potential downside of 30.99%. Given Fluor's higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Fluor is more favorable than Sterling Construction.

Profitability

This table compares Sterling Construction and Fluor's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Net MarginsReturn on EquityReturn on Assets
Sterling Construction4.12%18.54%4.38%
Fluor-3.63%10.56%1.89%

Insider and Institutional Ownership

81.8% of Sterling Construction shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 64.6% of Fluor shares are held by institutional investors. 2.1% of Sterling Construction shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.8% of Fluor shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Volatility and Risk

Sterling Construction has a beta of 1.43, indicating that its stock price is 43% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Fluor has a beta of 2.85, indicating that its stock price is 185% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Summary

Sterling Construction beats Fluor on 8 of the 13 factors compared between the two stocks.


Sterling Construction Competitors List

Competitor NameCompetitor BTM RankCompetitor PriceCompetitor Price ChangeCompetitor Market CapCompetitor RevenueCompetitor P/E RatioCompetitor Indicator(s)
Quanta Services logo
PWR
Quanta Services
1.9$95.70-0.4%$13.24 billion$12.11 billion35.31Decrease in Short Interest
AECOM logo
ACM
AECOM
1.5$67.05-0.4%$9.90 billion$13.24 billion-56.82
MasTec logo
MTZ
MasTec
1.4$101.65-3.0%$7.54 billion$7.18 billion24.32News Coverage
EMCOR Group logo
EME
EMCOR Group
1.3$119.93-1.0%$6.57 billion$9.17 billion48.36
KBR logo
KBR
KBR
1.8$39.87-0.9%$5.63 billion$5.64 billion-159.48
Fluor logo
FLR
Fluor
1.3$22.46-0.1%$3.16 billion$14.35 billion-5.55Increase in Short Interest
News Coverage
Comfort Systems USA logo
FIX
Comfort Systems USA
1.8$80.93-1.1%$2.93 billion$2.62 billion21.08Decrease in Short Interest
News Coverage
Dycom Industries logo
DY
Dycom Industries
1.6$95.80-4.0%$2.93 billion$3.34 billion116.83
Ameresco logo
AMRC
Ameresco
2.0$50.72-2.6%$2.58 billion$866.93 million46.53Analyst Report
Increase in Short Interest
Granite Construction logo
GVA
Granite Construction
1.7$39.60-0.2%$1.81 billion$3.32 billion0.00Analyst Upgrade
Analyst Revision
Primoris Services logo
PRIM
Primoris Services
1.8$34.90-0.3%$1.72 billion$3.11 billion17.19Unusual Options Activity
MYR Group logo
MYRG
MYR Group
1.4$70.70-0.4%$1.19 billion$2.07 billion22.30Insider Selling
Increase in Short Interest
News Coverage
Great Lakes Dredge & Dock logo
GLDD
Great Lakes Dredge & Dock
1.9N/AN/A$987.08 million$711.52 million13.71Insider Selling
Decrease in Short Interest
Aegion logo
AEGN
Aegion
1.3$30.56-0.3%$939.41 million$1.21 billion-22.98
Tutor Perini logo
TPC
Tutor Perini
1.6$17.48-0.6%$890.13 million$4.45 billion-62.43
Argan logo
AGX
Argan
1.5$54.60-2.4%$856.67 million$239 million121.33Earnings Announcement
Dividend Announcement
News Coverage
Northwest Pipe logo
NWPX
Northwest Pipe
1.3$33.36-2.5%$327.40 million$279.32 million12.73
Orion Group logo
ORN
Orion Group
1.2$5.93-2.5%$176.13 million$708.39 million10.59
Hill International logo
HIL
Hill International
0.8$2.88-1.0%$162.67 million$376.44 million26.18Increase in Short Interest
This page was last updated on 4/18/2021 by MarketBeat.com Staff
MarketBeat - Stock Market News and Research Tools logo

MarketBeat empowers individual investors to make better trading decisions by providing real-time financial data and objective market analysis. Whether you’re looking for analyst ratings, corporate buybacks, dividends, earnings, economic reports, financials, insider trades, IPOs, SEC filings or stock splits, MarketBeat has the objective information you need to analyze any stock. Learn more.

MarketBeat is accredited by the Better Business Bureau

© American Consumer News, LLC dba MarketBeat® 2010-2021. All rights reserved.
326 E 8th St #105, Sioux Falls, SD 57103 | U.S. Based Support Team at [email protected] | (844) 978-6257
MarketBeat does not provide personalized financial advice and does not issue recommendations or offers to buy stock or sell any security. Learn more.

Our Accessibility Statement | Terms of Service | Do Not Sell My Information

© 2021 Market data provided is at least 10-minutes delayed and hosted by Barchart Solutions. Information is provided 'as-is' and solely for informational purposes, not for trading purposes or advice, and is delayed. To see all exchange delays and terms of use please see disclaimer. Fundamental company data provided by Zacks Investment Research. As a bonus to opt-ing into our email newsletters, you will also get a free subscription to the Liberty Through Wealth e-newsletter. You can opt out at any time.