NASDAQ:STRL

Sterling Construction Competitors

$20.83

-0.11 (-0.53 %)

(As of 04/16/2021 04:00 PM ET)

Add

Compare

Today's Range

$20.67

Now: $20.83▼

$21.27

50-Day Range

$19.57

MA: $21.84▼

$23.85

52-Week Range

$6.72

Now: $20.83▼

$24.49

Volume120,148 shs

Average Volume342,879 shs

Market Capitalization$595.72 million

P/E Ratio9.97

Dividend YieldN/A

Beta1.43

Sterling Construction (NASDAQ:STRL) Vs. PWR, ACM, MTZ, EME, KBR, and FLR

Should you be buying STRL stock or one of its competitors? Companies in the sub-industry of "construction & engineering" are considered alternatives and competitors to Sterling Construction, including Quanta Services (PWR), AECOM (ACM), MasTec (MTZ), EMCOR Group (EME), KBR (KBR), and Fluor (FLR).

Sterling Construction vs. Quanta Services Stock

Quanta Services (NYSE:PWR) and Sterling Construction (NASDAQ:STRL) are both construction companies, but which is the superior stock? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, institutional ownership, dividends, profitability, valuation, risk and earnings.

Earnings & Valuation

This table compares Quanta Services and Sterling Construction's revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Quanta Services	$12.11 billion	1.09	$402.04 million	$3.05	31.38
Sterling Construction	$1.13 billion	0.53	$39.90 million	$0.90	23.14

Quanta Services has higher revenue and earnings than Sterling Construction. Sterling Construction is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Quanta Services, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a summary of current recommendations and price targets for Quanta Services and Sterling Construction, as provided by MarketBeat.com.

	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Quanta Services	0	3	7	0	2.70
Sterling Construction	0	0	0	0	N/A

Quanta Services currently has a consensus price target of $73.70, suggesting a potential downside of 22.99%. Given Quanta Services' higher probable upside, equities analysts clearly believe Quanta Services is more favorable than Sterling Construction.

Insider and Institutional Ownership

86.5% of Quanta Services shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 81.8% of Sterling Construction shares are held by institutional investors. 1.4% of Quanta Services shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 2.1% of Sterling Construction shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Volatility and Risk

Quanta Services has a beta of 1.24, suggesting that its stock price is 24% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Sterling Construction has a beta of 1.43, suggesting that its stock price is 43% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Profitability

This table compares Quanta Services and Sterling Construction's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Quanta Services	3.45%	11.61%	5.61%
Sterling Construction	4.12%	18.54%	4.38%

Summary

Quanta Services beats Sterling Construction on 9 of the 13 factors compared between the two stocks.

Sterling Construction vs. AECOM Stock

AECOM (NYSE:ACM) and Sterling Construction (NASDAQ:STRL) are both construction companies, but which is the superior investment? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their valuation, institutional ownership, dividends, analyst recommendations, profitability, risk and earnings.

Institutional & Insider Ownership

88.8% of AECOM shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 81.8% of Sterling Construction shares are owned by institutional investors. 4.9% of AECOM shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 2.1% of Sterling Construction shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Earnings and Valuation

This table compares AECOM and Sterling Construction's revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
AECOM	$13.24 billion	0.75	$-186,370,000.00	$2.15	31.19
Sterling Construction	$1.13 billion	0.53	$39.90 million	$0.90	23.14

Sterling Construction has lower revenue, but higher earnings than AECOM. Sterling Construction is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than AECOM, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Analyst Ratings

This is a summary of recent ratings and target prices for AECOM and Sterling Construction, as reported by MarketBeat.

	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
AECOM	0	1	6	0	2.86
Sterling Construction	0	0	0	0	N/A

AECOM presently has a consensus target price of $57.5556, suggesting a potential downside of 14.16%. Given AECOM's higher possible upside, research analysts clearly believe AECOM is more favorable than Sterling Construction.

Profitability

This table compares AECOM and Sterling Construction's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
AECOM	-1.41%	9.37%	2.55%
Sterling Construction	4.12%	18.54%	4.38%

Risk & Volatility

AECOM has a beta of 1.61, suggesting that its share price is 61% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Sterling Construction has a beta of 1.43, suggesting that its share price is 43% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Summary

AECOM beats Sterling Construction on 8 of the 13 factors compared between the two stocks.

Sterling Construction vs. MasTec Stock

Sterling Construction (NASDAQ:STRL) and MasTec (NYSE:MTZ) are both construction companies, but which is the superior business? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their institutional ownership, earnings, dividends, profitability, valuation, risk and analyst recommendations.

Analyst Ratings

This is a summary of recent ratings and price targets for Sterling Construction and MasTec, as reported by MarketBeat.

	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Sterling Construction	0	0	0	0	N/A
MasTec	0	0	10	0	3.00

MasTec has a consensus target price of $77.3636, indicating a potential downside of 23.89%. Given MasTec's higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe MasTec is more favorable than Sterling Construction.

Profitability

This table compares Sterling Construction and MasTec's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Sterling Construction	4.12%	18.54%	4.38%
MasTec	4.86%	18.75%	6.64%

Risk and Volatility

Sterling Construction has a beta of 1.43, meaning that its stock price is 43% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, MasTec has a beta of 1.38, meaning that its stock price is 38% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Institutional and Insider Ownership

81.8% of Sterling Construction shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 82.5% of MasTec shares are held by institutional investors. 2.1% of Sterling Construction shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 23.9% of MasTec shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Valuation and Earnings

This table compares Sterling Construction and MasTec's top-line revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Sterling Construction	$1.13 billion	0.53	$39.90 million	$0.90	23.14
MasTec	$7.18 billion	1.05	$392.33 million	$5.09	19.97

MasTec has higher revenue and earnings than Sterling Construction. MasTec is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Sterling Construction, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Summary

MasTec beats Sterling Construction on 12 of the 13 factors compared between the two stocks.

Sterling Construction vs. EMCOR Group Stock

EMCOR Group (NYSE:EME) and Sterling Construction (NASDAQ:STRL) are both construction companies, but which is the superior business? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their earnings, valuation, profitability, analyst recommendations, institutional ownership, risk and dividends.

Risk and Volatility

EMCOR Group has a beta of 1.18, suggesting that its stock price is 18% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Sterling Construction has a beta of 1.43, suggesting that its stock price is 43% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Profitability

This table compares EMCOR Group and Sterling Construction's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
EMCOR Group	1.57%	16.86%	7.10%
Sterling Construction	4.12%	18.54%	4.38%

Insider and Institutional Ownership

93.3% of EMCOR Group shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 81.8% of Sterling Construction shares are owned by institutional investors. 1.9% of EMCOR Group shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 2.1% of Sterling Construction shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Valuation & Earnings

This table compares EMCOR Group and Sterling Construction's revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
EMCOR Group	$9.17 billion	0.72	$325.14 million	$5.75	20.86
Sterling Construction	$1.13 billion	0.53	$39.90 million	$0.90	23.14

EMCOR Group has higher revenue and earnings than Sterling Construction. EMCOR Group is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Sterling Construction, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a summary of current recommendations for EMCOR Group and Sterling Construction, as provided by MarketBeat.com.

	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
EMCOR Group	0	3	0	0	2.00
Sterling Construction	0	0	0	0	N/A

EMCOR Group currently has a consensus price target of $84.00, indicating a potential downside of 29.96%. Given EMCOR Group's higher possible upside, research analysts clearly believe EMCOR Group is more favorable than Sterling Construction.

Summary

EMCOR Group beats Sterling Construction on 8 of the 12 factors compared between the two stocks.

Sterling Construction vs. KBR Stock

KBR (NYSE:KBR) and Sterling Construction (NASDAQ:STRL) are both construction companies, but which is the superior stock? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their earnings, risk, valuation, profitability, dividends, analyst recommendations and institutional ownership.

Earnings & Valuation

This table compares KBR and Sterling Construction's gross revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
KBR	$5.64 billion	1.00	$202 million	$1.69	23.59
Sterling Construction	$1.13 billion	0.53	$39.90 million	$0.90	23.14

KBR has higher revenue and earnings than Sterling Construction. Sterling Construction is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than KBR, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a breakdown of recent recommendations and price targets for KBR and Sterling Construction, as provided by MarketBeat.

	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
KBR	0	1	8	0	2.89
Sterling Construction	0	0	0	0	N/A

KBR presently has a consensus price target of $35.0833, suggesting a potential downside of 12.01%. Given KBR's higher probable upside, research analysts clearly believe KBR is more favorable than Sterling Construction.

Profitability

This table compares KBR and Sterling Construction's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
KBR	-0.57%	13.98%	4.62%
Sterling Construction	4.12%	18.54%	4.38%

Institutional & Insider Ownership

98.2% of KBR shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 81.8% of Sterling Construction shares are owned by institutional investors. 1.0% of KBR shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 2.1% of Sterling Construction shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Risk & Volatility

KBR has a beta of 1.39, meaning that its stock price is 39% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Sterling Construction has a beta of 1.43, meaning that its stock price is 43% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Summary

KBR beats Sterling Construction on 8 of the 13 factors compared between the two stocks.

Sterling Construction vs. Fluor Stock

Sterling Construction (NASDAQ:STRL) and Fluor (NYSE:FLR) are both construction companies, but which is the superior stock? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their institutional ownership, valuation, risk, profitability, dividends, earnings and analyst recommendations.

Earnings and Valuation

This table compares Sterling Construction and Fluor's gross revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Sterling Construction	$1.13 billion	0.53	$39.90 million	$0.90	23.14
Fluor	$14.35 billion	0.22	$-1,522,160,000.00	$2.99	7.51

Sterling Construction has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Fluor. Fluor is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Sterling Construction, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a breakdown of recent ratings and price targets for Sterling Construction and Fluor, as reported by MarketBeat.com.

	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Sterling Construction	0	0	0	0	N/A
Fluor	0	4	1	0	2.20

Fluor has a consensus price target of $15.50, suggesting a potential downside of 30.99%. Given Fluor's higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Fluor is more favorable than Sterling Construction.

Profitability

This table compares Sterling Construction and Fluor's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Sterling Construction	4.12%	18.54%	4.38%
Fluor	-3.63%	10.56%	1.89%

Insider and Institutional Ownership

81.8% of Sterling Construction shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 64.6% of Fluor shares are held by institutional investors. 2.1% of Sterling Construction shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.8% of Fluor shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Volatility and Risk

Sterling Construction has a beta of 1.43, indicating that its stock price is 43% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Fluor has a beta of 2.85, indicating that its stock price is 185% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Summary

Sterling Construction beats Fluor on 8 of the 13 factors compared between the two stocks.