Free Trial

Fluor (FLR) Competitors

Fluor logo
$47.01 -2.47 (-5.00%)
Closing price 06/10/2026 03:59 PM Eastern
Extended Trading
$47.02 +0.02 (+0.04%)
As of 05:48 AM Eastern
Extended trading is trading that happens on electronic markets outside of regular trading hours. This is a fair market value extended hours price provided by Massive. Learn more.

FLR vs. STRL, ACM, BLD, EME, and J

Should you buy Fluor stock or one of its competitors? MarketBeat compares Fluor with other companies and stocks that may be similar based on industry, sector, market capitalization, business model, investor interest, or shared news coverage. Companies and stocks commonly compared with Fluor include Sterling Infrastructure (STRL), AECOM (ACM), TopBuild (BLD), EMCOR Group (EME), and Jacobs Solutions (J).

How does Fluor compare to Sterling Infrastructure?

Sterling Infrastructure (NASDAQ:STRL) and Fluor (NYSE:FLR) are both construction companies, but which is the better stock? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their profitability, dividends, earnings, media sentiment, valuation, risk, analyst recommendations and institutional ownership.

Sterling Infrastructure has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Fluor. Fluor is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Sterling Infrastructure, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Sterling Infrastructure$2.49B9.49$290.15M$11.1868.90
Fluor$15.50B0.42-$51M$1.7227.33

Sterling Infrastructure has a net margin of 12.02% compared to Fluor's net margin of 2.30%. Sterling Infrastructure's return on equity of 35.64% beat Fluor's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Sterling Infrastructure12.02% 35.64% 15.10%
Fluor 2.30%5.90%2.61%

81.0% of Sterling Infrastructure shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 88.1% of Fluor shares are held by institutional investors. 1.6% of Sterling Infrastructure shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 1.7% of Fluor shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

In the previous week, Sterling Infrastructure had 20 more articles in the media than Fluor. MarketBeat recorded 23 mentions for Sterling Infrastructure and 3 mentions for Fluor. Sterling Infrastructure's average media sentiment score of 1.14 beat Fluor's score of 0.88 indicating that Sterling Infrastructure is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Sterling Infrastructure
15 Very Positive mention(s)
2 Positive mention(s)
5 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
Fluor
2 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

Sterling Infrastructure has a beta of 1.82, suggesting that its stock price is 82% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Fluor has a beta of 1.25, suggesting that its stock price is 25% more volatile than the broader market.

Sterling Infrastructure currently has a consensus price target of $720.67, indicating a potential downside of 6.44%. Fluor has a consensus price target of $53.33, indicating a potential upside of 13.46%. Given Fluor's higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Fluor is more favorable than Sterling Infrastructure.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Sterling Infrastructure
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
7 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.13
Fluor
0 Sell rating(s)
4 Hold rating(s)
4 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.50

Summary

Sterling Infrastructure beats Fluor on 13 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Fluor compare to AECOM?

Fluor (NYSE:FLR) and AECOM (NYSE:ACM) are both mid-cap construction companies, but which is the superior investment? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their earnings, risk, analyst recommendations, valuation, institutional ownership, media sentiment, dividends and profitability.

Fluor currently has a consensus target price of $53.33, indicating a potential upside of 13.46%. AECOM has a consensus target price of $116.00, indicating a potential upside of 68.96%. Given AECOM's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe AECOM is more favorable than Fluor.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Fluor
0 Sell rating(s)
4 Hold rating(s)
4 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.50
AECOM
0 Sell rating(s)
4 Hold rating(s)
9 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.69

Fluor has a beta of 1.25, suggesting that its share price is 25% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, AECOM has a beta of 0.93, suggesting that its share price is 7% less volatile than the broader market.

AECOM has a net margin of 3.16% compared to Fluor's net margin of 2.30%. AECOM's return on equity of 28.52% beat Fluor's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Fluor2.30% 5.90% 2.61%
AECOM 3.16%28.52%6.08%

AECOM has higher revenue and earnings than Fluor. AECOM is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Fluor, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Fluor$15.50B0.42-$51M$1.7227.33
AECOM$16.14B0.55$561.77M$3.8317.93

In the previous week, AECOM had 10 more articles in the media than Fluor. MarketBeat recorded 13 mentions for AECOM and 3 mentions for Fluor. AECOM's average media sentiment score of 1.28 beat Fluor's score of 0.88 indicating that AECOM is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Fluor
2 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
AECOM
11 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
2 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

88.1% of Fluor shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 85.4% of AECOM shares are held by institutional investors. 1.7% of Fluor shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 0.5% of AECOM shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Summary

AECOM beats Fluor on 12 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Fluor compare to TopBuild?

Fluor (NYSE:FLR) and TopBuild (NYSE:BLD) are both construction companies, but which is the superior stock? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their risk, earnings, media sentiment, dividends, analyst recommendations, institutional ownership, valuation and profitability.

Fluor has a beta of 1.25, suggesting that its share price is 25% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, TopBuild has a beta of 1.8, suggesting that its share price is 80% more volatile than the broader market.

TopBuild has a net margin of 8.95% compared to Fluor's net margin of 2.30%. TopBuild's return on equity of 23.53% beat Fluor's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Fluor2.30% 5.90% 2.61%
TopBuild 8.95%23.53%8.61%

In the previous week, TopBuild had 1 more articles in the media than Fluor. MarketBeat recorded 4 mentions for TopBuild and 3 mentions for Fluor. Fluor's average media sentiment score of 0.88 beat TopBuild's score of 0.21 indicating that Fluor is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Fluor
2 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
TopBuild
1 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
3 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral

TopBuild has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Fluor. TopBuild is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Fluor, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Fluor$15.50B0.42-$51M$1.7227.33
TopBuild$5.62B1.96$521.73M$17.8022.11

88.1% of Fluor shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 95.7% of TopBuild shares are held by institutional investors. 1.7% of Fluor shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.5% of TopBuild shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Fluor presently has a consensus price target of $53.33, indicating a potential upside of 13.46%. TopBuild has a consensus price target of $466.77, indicating a potential upside of 18.58%. Given TopBuild's higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe TopBuild is more favorable than Fluor.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Fluor
0 Sell rating(s)
4 Hold rating(s)
4 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.50
TopBuild
0 Sell rating(s)
9 Hold rating(s)
5 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.47

Summary

TopBuild beats Fluor on 12 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Fluor compare to EMCOR Group?

Fluor (NYSE:FLR) and EMCOR Group (NYSE:EME) are both construction companies, but which is the superior business? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their earnings, analyst recommendations, institutional ownership, media sentiment, dividends, profitability, valuation and risk.

Fluor currently has a consensus target price of $53.33, indicating a potential upside of 13.46%. EMCOR Group has a consensus target price of $836.88, indicating a potential upside of 7.71%. Given Fluor's higher possible upside, equities analysts plainly believe Fluor is more favorable than EMCOR Group.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Fluor
0 Sell rating(s)
4 Hold rating(s)
4 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.50
EMCOR Group
0 Sell rating(s)
4 Hold rating(s)
10 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.71

Fluor has a beta of 1.25, suggesting that its stock price is 25% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, EMCOR Group has a beta of 1.12, suggesting that its stock price is 12% more volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, EMCOR Group had 20 more articles in the media than Fluor. MarketBeat recorded 23 mentions for EMCOR Group and 3 mentions for Fluor. EMCOR Group's average media sentiment score of 1.29 beat Fluor's score of 0.88 indicating that EMCOR Group is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Fluor
2 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
EMCOR Group
19 Very Positive mention(s)
2 Positive mention(s)
2 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

EMCOR Group has higher revenue and earnings than Fluor. EMCOR Group is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Fluor, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Fluor$15.50B0.42-$51M$1.7227.33
EMCOR Group$16.99B2.03$1.27B$29.8126.06

88.1% of Fluor shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 92.6% of EMCOR Group shares are held by institutional investors. 1.7% of Fluor shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 0.8% of EMCOR Group shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

EMCOR Group has a net margin of 7.54% compared to Fluor's net margin of 2.30%. EMCOR Group's return on equity of 35.19% beat Fluor's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Fluor2.30% 5.90% 2.61%
EMCOR Group 7.54%35.19%13.68%

Summary

EMCOR Group beats Fluor on 12 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Fluor compare to Jacobs Solutions?

Jacobs Solutions (NYSE:J) and Fluor (NYSE:FLR) are related companies, but which is the superior investment? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their risk, institutional ownership, valuation, profitability, media sentiment, analyst recommendations, earnings and dividends.

Jacobs Solutions presently has a consensus price target of $153.40, suggesting a potential upside of 25.79%. Fluor has a consensus price target of $53.33, suggesting a potential upside of 13.46%. Given Jacobs Solutions' higher probable upside, research analysts plainly believe Jacobs Solutions is more favorable than Fluor.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Jacobs Solutions
0 Sell rating(s)
6 Hold rating(s)
6 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.50
Fluor
0 Sell rating(s)
4 Hold rating(s)
4 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.50

85.7% of Jacobs Solutions shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 88.1% of Fluor shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.5% of Jacobs Solutions shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 1.7% of Fluor shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Jacobs Solutions has a net margin of 2.92% compared to Fluor's net margin of 2.30%. Jacobs Solutions' return on equity of 22.29% beat Fluor's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Jacobs Solutions2.92% 22.29% 6.85%
Fluor 2.30%5.90%2.61%

In the previous week, Jacobs Solutions had 9 more articles in the media than Fluor. MarketBeat recorded 12 mentions for Jacobs Solutions and 3 mentions for Fluor. Jacobs Solutions' average media sentiment score of 1.14 beat Fluor's score of 0.88 indicating that Jacobs Solutions is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Jacobs Solutions
9 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
2 Neutral mention(s)
1 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
Fluor
2 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

Jacobs Solutions has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Fluor. Fluor is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Jacobs Solutions, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Jacobs Solutions$13.17B1.09$289.34M$3.2237.87
Fluor$15.50B0.42-$51M$1.7227.33

Jacobs Solutions has a beta of 0.69, indicating that its stock price is 31% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Fluor has a beta of 1.25, indicating that its stock price is 25% more volatile than the broader market.

Summary

Jacobs Solutions beats Fluor on 11 of the 15 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Fluor News Delivered to You Automatically

Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for FLR and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.

Subscribe Now
SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding FLR and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.
Skip Chart

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of NYSE and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Skip Chart

FLR vs. The Competition

MetricFluorENGINRG/R&D SVS IndustryConstruction SectorNYSE Exchange
Market Cap$6.91B$10.03B$9.77B$23.11B
Dividend YieldN/A1.88%1.92%4.09%
P/E Ratio27.3322.1817.5630.13
Price / Sales0.421.894.0420.29
Price / Cash18.5924.0216.9024.21
Price / Book2.314.515.084.59
Net Income-$51M$224.31M$564.03M$1.07B
7 Day Performance-6.76%-1.30%14.71%-1.47%
1 Month Performance7.48%-5.87%11.66%-0.55%
1 Year Performance-5.84%20.66%8.76%19.04%

Fluor Competitors List

CompanyMarketRankShare PriceAnalysts' Price Target1Y Price PerformanceMarket CapRevenueP/E RatioEmployee CountIndicator(s)
FLR
Fluor
3.7038 of 5 stars
$47.01
-5.0%
$53.33
+13.5%
+4.7%$6.91B$15.50B27.3322,995
STRL
Sterling Infrastructure
2.8592 of 5 stars
$891.86
+1.1%
$720.67
-19.2%
+288.3%$27.08B$2.49B79.774,400
ACM
AECOM
4.9941 of 5 stars
$70.92
-0.3%
$116.00
+63.6%
-38.2%$9.14B$16.14B18.5251,000
BLD
TopBuild
3.1336 of 5 stars
$398.89
-0.7%
$466.77
+17.0%
+26.9%$11.26B$5.41B22.4114,707
EME
EMCOR Group
4.1146 of 5 stars
$823.23
+0.7%
$836.88
+1.7%
+66.7%$36.33B$16.99B27.6244,000

Related Companies and Tools


This page (NYSE:FLR) was last updated on 6/11/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.
From Our Partners