S&P 500   3,819.72 (-1.31%)
DOW   31,270.09 (-0.39%)
QQQ   308.99 (-2.96%)
AAPL   122.00 (-2.49%)
MSFT   227.56 (-2.70%)
FB   255.41 (-1.39%)
GOOGL   2,013.00 (-2.49%)
TSLA   654.95 (-4.59%)
AMZN   3,007.41 (-2.82%)
NVDA   513.00 (-4.34%)
BABA   235.26 (+0.36%)
CGC   33.26 (-5.65%)
GE   13.46 (+3.70%)
MU   89.25 (-2.02%)
NIO   41.42 (-4.32%)
AMD   80.84 (-3.91%)
T   28.72 (+1.77%)
F   12.20 (-2.79%)
ACB   10.47 (-5.08%)
DIS   192.00 (-1.00%)
BA   228.57 (+2.43%)
NFLX   521.70 (-4.77%)
PFE   34.37 (+2.57%)
S&P 500   3,819.72 (-1.31%)
DOW   31,270.09 (-0.39%)
QQQ   308.99 (-2.96%)
AAPL   122.00 (-2.49%)
MSFT   227.56 (-2.70%)
FB   255.41 (-1.39%)
GOOGL   2,013.00 (-2.49%)
TSLA   654.95 (-4.59%)
AMZN   3,007.41 (-2.82%)
NVDA   513.00 (-4.34%)
BABA   235.26 (+0.36%)
CGC   33.26 (-5.65%)
GE   13.46 (+3.70%)
MU   89.25 (-2.02%)
NIO   41.42 (-4.32%)
AMD   80.84 (-3.91%)
T   28.72 (+1.77%)
F   12.20 (-2.79%)
ACB   10.47 (-5.08%)
DIS   192.00 (-1.00%)
BA   228.57 (+2.43%)
NFLX   521.70 (-4.77%)
PFE   34.37 (+2.57%)
S&P 500   3,819.72 (-1.31%)
DOW   31,270.09 (-0.39%)
QQQ   308.99 (-2.96%)
AAPL   122.00 (-2.49%)
MSFT   227.56 (-2.70%)
FB   255.41 (-1.39%)
GOOGL   2,013.00 (-2.49%)
TSLA   654.95 (-4.59%)
AMZN   3,007.41 (-2.82%)
NVDA   513.00 (-4.34%)
BABA   235.26 (+0.36%)
CGC   33.26 (-5.65%)
GE   13.46 (+3.70%)
MU   89.25 (-2.02%)
NIO   41.42 (-4.32%)
AMD   80.84 (-3.91%)
T   28.72 (+1.77%)
F   12.20 (-2.79%)
ACB   10.47 (-5.08%)
DIS   192.00 (-1.00%)
BA   228.57 (+2.43%)
NFLX   521.70 (-4.77%)
PFE   34.37 (+2.57%)
S&P 500   3,819.72 (-1.31%)
DOW   31,270.09 (-0.39%)
QQQ   308.99 (-2.96%)
AAPL   122.00 (-2.49%)
MSFT   227.56 (-2.70%)
FB   255.41 (-1.39%)
GOOGL   2,013.00 (-2.49%)
TSLA   654.95 (-4.59%)
AMZN   3,007.41 (-2.82%)
NVDA   513.00 (-4.34%)
BABA   235.26 (+0.36%)
CGC   33.26 (-5.65%)
GE   13.46 (+3.70%)
MU   89.25 (-2.02%)
NIO   41.42 (-4.32%)
AMD   80.84 (-3.91%)
T   28.72 (+1.77%)
F   12.20 (-2.79%)
ACB   10.47 (-5.08%)
DIS   192.00 (-1.00%)
BA   228.57 (+2.43%)
NFLX   521.70 (-4.77%)
PFE   34.37 (+2.57%)
Log in
NYSE:FLR

Fluor Competitors

$17.96
+0.60 (+3.46 %)
(As of 03/3/2021 03:59 PM ET)
Add
Compare
Today's Range
$17.52
Now: $17.96
$18.53
50-Day Range
$16.48
MA: $18.76
$20.99
52-Week Range
$2.85
Now: $17.96
$21.50
Volume188,360 shs
Average Volume2.51 million shs
Market Capitalization$2.53 billion
P/E RatioN/A
Dividend YieldN/A
Beta2.85

Competitors

Fluor (NYSE:FLR) Vs. PWR, ACM, MTZ, EME, KBR, and AMRC

Should you be buying FLR stock or one of its competitors? Companies in the sub-industry of "construction & engineering" are considered alternatives and competitors to Fluor, including Quanta Services (PWR), AECOM (ACM), MasTec (MTZ), EMCOR Group (EME), KBR (KBR), and Ameresco (AMRC).

Fluor (NYSE:FLR) and Quanta Services (NYSE:PWR) are both construction companies, but which is the better investment? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their earnings, risk, institutional ownership, dividends, profitability, valuation and analyst recommendations.

Profitability

This table compares Fluor and Quanta Services' net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Net MarginsReturn on EquityReturn on Assets
Fluor-3.63%10.56%1.89%
Quanta Services3.45%11.61%5.61%

Analyst Recommendations

This is a breakdown of recent ratings and recommmendations for Fluor and Quanta Services, as reported by MarketBeat.com.

Sell RatingsHold RatingsBuy RatingsStrong Buy RatingsRating Score
Fluor05102.17
Quanta Services03702.70

Fluor currently has a consensus price target of $13.40, indicating a potential downside of 25.39%. Quanta Services has a consensus price target of $73.70, indicating a potential downside of 11.49%. Given Quanta Services' stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Quanta Services is more favorable than Fluor.

Earnings and Valuation

This table compares Fluor and Quanta Services' revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

Gross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Fluor$14.35 billion0.18$-1,522,160,000.00$2.996.01
Quanta Services$12.11 billion0.95$402.04 million$3.0527.11

Quanta Services has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Fluor. Fluor is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Quanta Services, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Insider & Institutional Ownership

64.6% of Fluor shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 86.5% of Quanta Services shares are held by institutional investors. 0.8% of Fluor shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 1.4% of Quanta Services shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Risk & Volatility

Fluor has a beta of 2.85, suggesting that its share price is 185% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Quanta Services has a beta of 1.24, suggesting that its share price is 24% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Summary

Quanta Services beats Fluor on 12 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

Fluor (NYSE:FLR) and AECOM (NYSE:ACM) are both mid-cap construction companies, but which is the better investment? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their earnings, risk, institutional ownership, dividends, profitability, valuation and analyst recommendations.

Profitability

This table compares Fluor and AECOM's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Net MarginsReturn on EquityReturn on Assets
Fluor-3.63%10.56%1.89%
AECOM-1.41%9.37%2.55%

Analyst Recommendations

This is a breakdown of recent ratings and recommmendations for Fluor and AECOM, as reported by MarketBeat.com.

Sell RatingsHold RatingsBuy RatingsStrong Buy RatingsRating Score
Fluor05102.17
AECOM01602.86

Fluor currently has a consensus price target of $13.40, indicating a potential downside of 25.39%. AECOM has a consensus price target of $55.25, indicating a potential downside of 3.83%. Given AECOM's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe AECOM is more favorable than Fluor.

Earnings and Valuation

This table compares Fluor and AECOM's revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

Gross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Fluor$14.35 billion0.18$-1,522,160,000.00$2.996.01
AECOM$13.24 billion0.64$-186,370,000.00$2.1526.72

AECOM has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Fluor. Fluor is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than AECOM, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Insider & Institutional Ownership

64.6% of Fluor shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 88.8% of AECOM shares are held by institutional investors. 0.8% of Fluor shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 4.9% of AECOM shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Risk & Volatility

Fluor has a beta of 2.85, suggesting that its share price is 185% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, AECOM has a beta of 1.61, suggesting that its share price is 61% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Summary

AECOM beats Fluor on 9 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

Fluor (NYSE:FLR) and MasTec (NYSE:MTZ) are both mid-cap construction companies, but which is the better investment? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their earnings, risk, institutional ownership, dividends, profitability, valuation and analyst recommendations.

Profitability

This table compares Fluor and MasTec's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Net MarginsReturn on EquityReturn on Assets
Fluor-3.63%10.56%1.89%
MasTec4.86%18.75%6.64%

Analyst Recommendations

This is a breakdown of recent ratings and recommmendations for Fluor and MasTec, as reported by MarketBeat.com.

Sell RatingsHold RatingsBuy RatingsStrong Buy RatingsRating Score
Fluor05102.17
MasTec001103.00

Fluor currently has a consensus price target of $13.40, indicating a potential downside of 25.39%. MasTec has a consensus price target of $75.00, indicating a potential downside of 16.44%. Given MasTec's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe MasTec is more favorable than Fluor.

Earnings and Valuation

This table compares Fluor and MasTec's revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

Gross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Fluor$14.35 billion0.18$-1,522,160,000.00$2.996.01
MasTec$7.18 billion0.92$392.33 million$5.0917.63

MasTec has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Fluor. Fluor is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than MasTec, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Insider & Institutional Ownership

64.6% of Fluor shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 82.5% of MasTec shares are held by institutional investors. 0.8% of Fluor shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 23.9% of MasTec shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Risk & Volatility

Fluor has a beta of 2.85, suggesting that its share price is 185% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, MasTec has a beta of 1.38, suggesting that its share price is 38% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Summary

MasTec beats Fluor on 12 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

Fluor (NYSE:FLR) and EMCOR Group (NYSE:EME) are both mid-cap construction companies, but which is the better investment? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their earnings, risk, institutional ownership, dividends, profitability, valuation and analyst recommendations.

Profitability

This table compares Fluor and EMCOR Group's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Net MarginsReturn on EquityReturn on Assets
Fluor-3.63%10.56%1.89%
EMCOR Group1.57%16.86%7.10%

Analyst Recommendations

This is a breakdown of recent ratings and recommmendations for Fluor and EMCOR Group, as reported by MarketBeat.com.

Sell RatingsHold RatingsBuy RatingsStrong Buy RatingsRating Score
Fluor05102.17
EMCOR Group03002.00

Fluor currently has a consensus price target of $13.40, indicating a potential downside of 25.39%. EMCOR Group has a consensus price target of $84.00, indicating a potential downside of 17.78%. Given EMCOR Group's higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe EMCOR Group is more favorable than Fluor.

Earnings and Valuation

This table compares Fluor and EMCOR Group's revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

Gross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Fluor$14.35 billion0.18$-1,522,160,000.00$2.996.01
EMCOR Group$9.17 billion0.61$325.14 million$5.7517.69

EMCOR Group has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Fluor. Fluor is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than EMCOR Group, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Insider & Institutional Ownership

64.6% of Fluor shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 93.3% of EMCOR Group shares are held by institutional investors. 0.8% of Fluor shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 1.9% of EMCOR Group shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Risk & Volatility

Fluor has a beta of 2.85, suggesting that its share price is 185% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, EMCOR Group has a beta of 1.18, suggesting that its share price is 18% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Summary

EMCOR Group beats Fluor on 10 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

Fluor (NYSE:FLR) and KBR (NYSE:KBR) are both mid-cap construction companies, but which is the better investment? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their earnings, risk, institutional ownership, dividends, profitability, valuation and analyst recommendations.

Insider & Institutional Ownership

64.6% of Fluor shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 98.2% of KBR shares are held by institutional investors. 0.8% of Fluor shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 1.0% of KBR shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Profitability

This table compares Fluor and KBR's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Net MarginsReturn on EquityReturn on Assets
Fluor-3.63%10.56%1.89%
KBR-0.57%13.98%4.62%

Analyst Recommendations

This is a breakdown of recent ratings and recommmendations for Fluor and KBR, as reported by MarketBeat.com.

Sell RatingsHold RatingsBuy RatingsStrong Buy RatingsRating Score
Fluor05102.17
KBR01902.90

Fluor currently has a consensus price target of $13.40, indicating a potential downside of 25.39%. KBR has a consensus price target of $33.0833, indicating a potential upside of 7.03%. Given KBR's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe KBR is more favorable than Fluor.

Risk & Volatility

Fluor has a beta of 2.85, suggesting that its share price is 185% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, KBR has a beta of 1.39, suggesting that its share price is 39% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Earnings and Valuation

This table compares Fluor and KBR's revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

Gross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Fluor$14.35 billion0.18$-1,522,160,000.00$2.996.01
KBR$5.64 billion0.77$202 million$1.6918.29

KBR has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Fluor. Fluor is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than KBR, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Summary

KBR beats Fluor on 10 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

Fluor (NYSE:FLR) and Ameresco (NYSE:AMRC) are both mid-cap construction companies, but which is the superior investment? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their earnings, risk, valuation, institutional ownership, profitability, dividends and analyst recommendations.

Insider and Institutional Ownership

64.6% of Fluor shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 39.7% of Ameresco shares are held by institutional investors. 0.8% of Fluor shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 51.1% of Ameresco shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Profitability

This table compares Fluor and Ameresco's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Net MarginsReturn on EquityReturn on Assets
Fluor-3.63%10.56%1.89%
Ameresco5.15%12.88%3.90%

Analyst Ratings

This is a breakdown of recent recommendations for Fluor and Ameresco, as reported by MarketBeat.com.

Sell RatingsHold RatingsBuy RatingsStrong Buy RatingsRating Score
Fluor05102.17
Ameresco00703.00

Fluor currently has a consensus target price of $13.40, indicating a potential downside of 25.39%. Ameresco has a consensus target price of $61.5714, indicating a potential upside of 15.54%. Given Ameresco's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Ameresco is more favorable than Fluor.

Risk & Volatility

Fluor has a beta of 2.85, suggesting that its share price is 185% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Ameresco has a beta of 0.55, suggesting that its share price is 45% less volatile than the S&P 500.

Earnings & Valuation

This table compares Fluor and Ameresco's revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

Gross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Fluor$14.35 billion0.18$-1,522,160,000.00$2.996.01
Ameresco$866.93 million2.92$44.44 million$0.8363.73

Ameresco has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Fluor. Fluor is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Ameresco, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Summary

Ameresco beats Fluor on 10 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.


Fluor Competitors List

Competitor NameCompetitor BTM RankCompetitor PriceCompetitor Price ChangeCompetitor Market CapCompetitor RevenueCompetitor P/E RatioCompetitor Indicator(s)
Quanta Services logo
PWR
Quanta Services
2.0$82.69+1.8%$11.69 billion$12.11 billion30.51Earnings Announcement
Insider Selling
Analyst Revision
AECOM logo
ACM
AECOM
1.5$57.45+0.4%$8.52 billion$13.24 billion-48.69
MasTec logo
MTZ
MasTec
1.7$89.76+0.5%$6.59 billion$7.18 billion21.47Earnings Announcement
Analyst Report
Analyst Revision
EMCOR Group logo
EME
EMCOR Group
1.3$101.69+1.6%$5.48 billion$9.17 billion41.00Earnings Announcement
KBR logo
KBR
KBR
2.0$30.91+0.2%$4.35 billion$5.64 billion-123.64Analyst Report
Ameresco logo
AMRC
Ameresco
2.0$52.90+7.2%$2.71 billion$866.93 million48.53Earnings Announcement
Analyst Report
Analyst Revision
News Coverage
Gap Down
Dycom Industries logo
DY
Dycom Industries
1.6$87.18+11.1%$2.47 billion$3.34 billion106.32Earnings Announcement
Unusual Options Activity
News Coverage
Gap Up
Comfort Systems USA logo
FIX
Comfort Systems USA
1.9$68.06+2.3%$2.41 billion$2.62 billion17.72Dividend Increase
Insider Buying
Primoris Services logo
PRIM
Primoris Services
1.8$36.21+4.5%$1.70 billion$3.11 billion17.84
Granite Construction logo
GVA
Granite Construction
1.2$36.44+1.0%$1.65 billion$3.32 billion0.00
MYR Group logo
MYRG
MYR Group
1.4$62.14+0.6%$1.03 billion$2.07 billion19.60
Great Lakes Dredge & Dock logo
GLDD
Great Lakes Dredge & Dock
1.5$15.03+1.4%$992.43 million$711.52 million13.66Insider Selling
News Coverage
Tutor Perini logo
TPC
Tutor Perini
1.8$16.18+1.8%$809.02 million$4.45 billion-57.79Analyst Downgrade
Decrease in Short Interest
Analyst Revision
Argan logo
AGX
Argan
1.5$51.76+0.8%$805.37 million$239 million115.02
Aegion logo
AEGN
Aegion
1.3$25.69+0.4%$793.94 million$1.21 billion-19.32
Sterling Construction logo
STRL
Sterling Construction
1.6$19.49+18.9%$651.52 million$1.13 billion9.33Earnings Announcement
News Coverage
Northwest Pipe logo
NWPX
Northwest Pipe
1.3$34.70+1.2%$344.35 million$279.32 million13.24News Coverage
Orion Group logo
ORN
Orion Group
1.4$5.50+0.7%$166.07 million$708.39 million9.82Earnings Announcement
Analyst Downgrade
Analyst Revision
Hill International logo
HIL
Hill International
0.9$2.63+0.8%$149.00 million$376.44 million23.91
This page was last updated on 3/3/2021 by MarketBeat.com Staff

Enter your email address below to receive a concise daily summary of analysts' upgrades, downgrades and new coverage with MarketBeat.com's FREE daily email newsletter.