Fluor Competitors

Fluor (NYSE:FLR) and Quanta Services (NYSE:PWR) are both construction companies, but which is the better investment? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their earnings, risk, institutional ownership, dividends, profitability, valuation and analyst recommendations.

Profitability

This table compares Fluor and Quanta Services' net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a breakdown of recent ratings and recommmendations for Fluor and Quanta Services, as reported by MarketBeat.com.

Fluor currently has a consensus price target of $13.40, indicating a potential downside of 25.39%. Quanta Services has a consensus price target of $73.70, indicating a potential downside of 11.49%. Given Quanta Services' stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Quanta Services is more favorable than Fluor.

Earnings and Valuation

This table compares Fluor and Quanta Services' revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

Quanta Services has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Fluor. Fluor is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Quanta Services, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Insider & Institutional Ownership

64.6% of Fluor shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 86.5% of Quanta Services shares are held by institutional investors. 0.8% of Fluor shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 1.4% of Quanta Services shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Risk & Volatility

Fluor has a beta of 2.85, suggesting that its share price is 185% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Quanta Services has a beta of 1.24, suggesting that its share price is 24% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Summary

Quanta Services beats Fluor on 12 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

Fluor (NYSE:FLR) and AECOM (NYSE:ACM) are both mid-cap construction companies, but which is the better investment? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their earnings, risk, institutional ownership, dividends, profitability, valuation and analyst recommendations.

Profitability

This table compares Fluor and AECOM's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a breakdown of recent ratings and recommmendations for Fluor and AECOM, as reported by MarketBeat.com.

Fluor currently has a consensus price target of $13.40, indicating a potential downside of 25.39%. AECOM has a consensus price target of $55.25, indicating a potential downside of 3.83%. Given AECOM's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe AECOM is more favorable than Fluor.

Earnings and Valuation

This table compares Fluor and AECOM's revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

AECOM has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Fluor. Fluor is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than AECOM, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Insider & Institutional Ownership

64.6% of Fluor shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 88.8% of AECOM shares are held by institutional investors. 0.8% of Fluor shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 4.9% of AECOM shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Risk & Volatility

Fluor has a beta of 2.85, suggesting that its share price is 185% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, AECOM has a beta of 1.61, suggesting that its share price is 61% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Summary

AECOM beats Fluor on 9 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

Fluor (NYSE:FLR) and MasTec (NYSE:MTZ) are both mid-cap construction companies, but which is the better investment? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their earnings, risk, institutional ownership, dividends, profitability, valuation and analyst recommendations.

Profitability

This table compares Fluor and MasTec's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a breakdown of recent ratings and recommmendations for Fluor and MasTec, as reported by MarketBeat.com.

Fluor currently has a consensus price target of $13.40, indicating a potential downside of 25.39%. MasTec has a consensus price target of $75.00, indicating a potential downside of 16.44%. Given MasTec's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe MasTec is more favorable than Fluor.

Earnings and Valuation

This table compares Fluor and MasTec's revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

MasTec has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Fluor. Fluor is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than MasTec, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Insider & Institutional Ownership

64.6% of Fluor shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 82.5% of MasTec shares are held by institutional investors. 0.8% of Fluor shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 23.9% of MasTec shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Risk & Volatility

Fluor has a beta of 2.85, suggesting that its share price is 185% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, MasTec has a beta of 1.38, suggesting that its share price is 38% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Summary

MasTec beats Fluor on 12 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

Fluor (NYSE:FLR) and EMCOR Group (NYSE:EME) are both mid-cap construction companies, but which is the better investment? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their earnings, risk, institutional ownership, dividends, profitability, valuation and analyst recommendations.

Profitability

This table compares Fluor and EMCOR Group's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a breakdown of recent ratings and recommmendations for Fluor and EMCOR Group, as reported by MarketBeat.com.

Fluor currently has a consensus price target of $13.40, indicating a potential downside of 25.39%. EMCOR Group has a consensus price target of $84.00, indicating a potential downside of 17.78%. Given EMCOR Group's higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe EMCOR Group is more favorable than Fluor.

Earnings and Valuation

This table compares Fluor and EMCOR Group's revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

EMCOR Group has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Fluor. Fluor is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than EMCOR Group, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Insider & Institutional Ownership

64.6% of Fluor shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 93.3% of EMCOR Group shares are held by institutional investors. 0.8% of Fluor shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 1.9% of EMCOR Group shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Risk & Volatility

Fluor has a beta of 2.85, suggesting that its share price is 185% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, EMCOR Group has a beta of 1.18, suggesting that its share price is 18% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Summary

EMCOR Group beats Fluor on 10 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

Fluor (NYSE:FLR) and KBR (NYSE:KBR) are both mid-cap construction companies, but which is the better investment? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their earnings, risk, institutional ownership, dividends, profitability, valuation and analyst recommendations.

Insider & Institutional Ownership

64.6% of Fluor shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 98.2% of KBR shares are held by institutional investors. 0.8% of Fluor shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 1.0% of KBR shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Profitability

This table compares Fluor and KBR's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a breakdown of recent ratings and recommmendations for Fluor and KBR, as reported by MarketBeat.com.

Fluor currently has a consensus price target of $13.40, indicating a potential downside of 25.39%. KBR has a consensus price target of $33.0833, indicating a potential upside of 7.03%. Given KBR's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe KBR is more favorable than Fluor.

Risk & Volatility

Fluor has a beta of 2.85, suggesting that its share price is 185% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, KBR has a beta of 1.39, suggesting that its share price is 39% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Earnings and Valuation

This table compares Fluor and KBR's revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

KBR has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Fluor. Fluor is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than KBR, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Summary

KBR beats Fluor on 10 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

Fluor (NYSE:FLR) and Ameresco (NYSE:AMRC) are both mid-cap construction companies, but which is the superior investment? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their earnings, risk, valuation, institutional ownership, profitability, dividends and analyst recommendations.

Insider and Institutional Ownership

64.6% of Fluor shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 39.7% of Ameresco shares are held by institutional investors. 0.8% of Fluor shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 51.1% of Ameresco shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Profitability

This table compares Fluor and Ameresco's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Analyst Ratings

This is a breakdown of recent recommendations for Fluor and Ameresco, as reported by MarketBeat.com.

Fluor currently has a consensus target price of $13.40, indicating a potential downside of 25.39%. Ameresco has a consensus target price of $61.5714, indicating a potential upside of 15.54%. Given Ameresco's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Ameresco is more favorable than Fluor.

Risk & Volatility

Fluor has a beta of 2.85, suggesting that its share price is 185% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Ameresco has a beta of 0.55, suggesting that its share price is 45% less volatile than the S&P 500.

Earnings & Valuation

This table compares Fluor and Ameresco's revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

Ameresco has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Fluor. Fluor is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Ameresco, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Summary

Ameresco beats Fluor on 10 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.