MasTec Competitors

MasTec (NYSE:MTZ) and Quanta Services (NYSE:PWR) are both construction companies, but which is the better business? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their profitability, dividends, analyst recommendations, institutional ownership, valuation, risk and earnings.

Profitability

This table compares MasTec and Quanta Services' net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Volatility & Risk

MasTec has a beta of 1.38, suggesting that its stock price is 38% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Quanta Services has a beta of 1.24, suggesting that its stock price is 24% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Valuation and Earnings

This table compares MasTec and Quanta Services' top-line revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

Quanta Services has higher revenue and earnings than MasTec. MasTec is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Quanta Services, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a summary of recent recommendations for MasTec and Quanta Services, as provided by MarketBeat.

MasTec currently has a consensus target price of $66.6667, suggesting a potential downside of 23.15%. Quanta Services has a consensus target price of $71.7273, suggesting a potential downside of 14.46%. Given Quanta Services' higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Quanta Services is more favorable than MasTec.

Insider and Institutional Ownership

82.5% of MasTec shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 86.5% of Quanta Services shares are owned by institutional investors. 23.9% of MasTec shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 1.4% of Quanta Services shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Summary

MasTec beats Quanta Services on 8 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

MasTec (NYSE:MTZ) and AECOM (NYSE:ACM) are both mid-cap construction companies, but which is the better business? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their profitability, dividends, analyst recommendations, institutional ownership, valuation, risk and earnings.

Profitability

This table compares MasTec and AECOM's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Volatility & Risk

MasTec has a beta of 1.38, suggesting that its stock price is 38% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, AECOM has a beta of 1.61, suggesting that its stock price is 61% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Valuation and Earnings

This table compares MasTec and AECOM's top-line revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

MasTec has higher earnings, but lower revenue than AECOM. MasTec is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than AECOM, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a summary of recent recommendations for MasTec and AECOM, as provided by MarketBeat.

MasTec currently has a consensus target price of $66.6667, suggesting a potential downside of 23.15%. AECOM has a consensus target price of $55.25, suggesting a potential downside of 4.56%. Given AECOM's higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe AECOM is more favorable than MasTec.

Insider and Institutional Ownership

82.5% of MasTec shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 88.8% of AECOM shares are owned by institutional investors. 23.9% of MasTec shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 4.9% of AECOM shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Summary

MasTec beats AECOM on 10 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

MasTec (NYSE:MTZ) and EMCOR Group (NYSE:EME) are both mid-cap construction companies, but which is the better business? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their profitability, dividends, analyst recommendations, institutional ownership, valuation, risk and earnings.

Profitability

This table compares MasTec and EMCOR Group's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Volatility & Risk

MasTec has a beta of 1.38, suggesting that its stock price is 38% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, EMCOR Group has a beta of 1.18, suggesting that its stock price is 18% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Valuation and Earnings

This table compares MasTec and EMCOR Group's top-line revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

MasTec has higher earnings, but lower revenue than EMCOR Group. EMCOR Group is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than MasTec, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a summary of recent recommendations for MasTec and EMCOR Group, as provided by MarketBeat.

MasTec currently has a consensus target price of $66.6667, suggesting a potential downside of 23.15%. EMCOR Group has a consensus target price of $84.00, suggesting a potential downside of 13.73%. Given EMCOR Group's higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe EMCOR Group is more favorable than MasTec.

Insider and Institutional Ownership

82.5% of MasTec shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 93.3% of EMCOR Group shares are owned by institutional investors. 23.9% of MasTec shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 1.9% of EMCOR Group shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Summary

MasTec beats EMCOR Group on 8 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

MasTec (NYSE:MTZ) and KBR (NYSE:KBR) are both mid-cap construction companies, but which is the better business? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their profitability, dividends, analyst recommendations, institutional ownership, valuation, risk and earnings.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a summary of recent recommendations for MasTec and KBR, as provided by MarketBeat.

MasTec currently has a consensus target price of $66.6667, suggesting a potential downside of 23.15%. KBR has a consensus target price of $33.0833, suggesting a potential upside of 6.72%. Given KBR's higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe KBR is more favorable than MasTec.

Insider and Institutional Ownership

82.5% of MasTec shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 98.2% of KBR shares are owned by institutional investors. 23.9% of MasTec shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 1.0% of KBR shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Volatility & Risk

MasTec has a beta of 1.38, suggesting that its stock price is 38% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, KBR has a beta of 1.39, suggesting that its stock price is 39% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Valuation and Earnings

This table compares MasTec and KBR's top-line revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

MasTec has higher revenue and earnings than KBR. MasTec is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than KBR, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Profitability

This table compares MasTec and KBR's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Summary

MasTec beats KBR on 11 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

Ameresco (NYSE:AMRC) and MasTec (NYSE:MTZ) are both mid-cap oils/energy companies, but which is the superior stock? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their institutional ownership, valuation, earnings, analyst recommendations, profitability, risk and dividends.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a summary of current recommendations and price targets for Ameresco and MasTec, as reported by MarketBeat.

Ameresco presently has a consensus price target of $53.7143, suggesting a potential downside of 5.96%. MasTec has a consensus price target of $66.6667, suggesting a potential downside of 23.15%. Given Ameresco's higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Ameresco is more favorable than MasTec.

Insider and Institutional Ownership

39.7% of Ameresco shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 82.5% of MasTec shares are owned by institutional investors. 51.1% of Ameresco shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 23.9% of MasTec shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Volatility and Risk

Ameresco has a beta of 0.55, meaning that its share price is 45% less volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, MasTec has a beta of 1.38, meaning that its share price is 38% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Valuation & Earnings

This table compares Ameresco and MasTec's top-line revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

MasTec has higher revenue and earnings than Ameresco. MasTec is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Ameresco, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Profitability

This table compares Ameresco and MasTec's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Summary

MasTec beats Ameresco on 8 of the 13 factors compared between the two stocks.

Dycom Industries (NYSE:DY) and MasTec (NYSE:MTZ) are both mid-cap construction companies, but which is the superior stock? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their institutional ownership, valuation, earnings, analyst recommendations, profitability, risk and dividends.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a summary of current recommendations and price targets for Dycom Industries and MasTec, as reported by MarketBeat.

Dycom Industries presently has a consensus price target of $72.1429, suggesting a potential downside of 5.79%. MasTec has a consensus price target of $66.6667, suggesting a potential downside of 23.15%. Given Dycom Industries' higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Dycom Industries is more favorable than MasTec.

Insider and Institutional Ownership

94.9% of Dycom Industries shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 82.5% of MasTec shares are owned by institutional investors. 5.7% of Dycom Industries shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 23.9% of MasTec shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Volatility and Risk

Dycom Industries has a beta of 1.62, meaning that its share price is 62% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, MasTec has a beta of 1.38, meaning that its share price is 38% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Valuation & Earnings

This table compares Dycom Industries and MasTec's top-line revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

MasTec has higher revenue and earnings than Dycom Industries. MasTec is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Dycom Industries, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Profitability

This table compares Dycom Industries and MasTec's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Summary

MasTec beats Dycom Industries on 10 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.