Granite Construction Competitors

Granite Construction (NYSE:GVA) and Quanta Services (NYSE:PWR) are both construction companies, but which is the superior investment? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, profitability, risk, valuation, earnings, institutional ownership and dividends.

Risk and Volatility

Granite Construction has a beta of 1.59, indicating that its stock price is 59% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Quanta Services has a beta of 1.24, indicating that its stock price is 24% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Insider and Institutional Ownership

93.8% of Granite Construction shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 86.5% of Quanta Services shares are held by institutional investors. 1.0% of Granite Construction shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 1.4% of Quanta Services shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Dividends

Granite Construction pays an annual dividend of $0.52 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.3%. Quanta Services pays an annual dividend of $0.24 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.3%. Quanta Services pays out 7.9% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Granite Construction has increased its dividend for 1 consecutive years and Quanta Services has increased its dividend for 1 consecutive years.

Profitability

This table compares Granite Construction and Quanta Services' net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a summary of current ratings and recommmendations for Granite Construction and Quanta Services, as reported by MarketBeat.

Granite Construction presently has a consensus price target of $55.00, suggesting a potential upside of 40.81%. Quanta Services has a consensus price target of $76.20, suggesting a potential downside of 20.05%. Given Granite Construction's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, equities research analysts clearly believe Granite Construction is more favorable than Quanta Services.

Valuation and Earnings

This table compares Granite Construction and Quanta Services' top-line revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

Quanta Services has higher revenue and earnings than Granite Construction.

Summary

Quanta Services beats Granite Construction on 8 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

AECOM (NYSE:ACM) and Granite Construction (NYSE:GVA) are both construction companies, but which is the superior business? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their valuation, analyst recommendations, risk, dividends, earnings, institutional ownership and profitability.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a breakdown of current recommendations for AECOM and Granite Construction, as provided by MarketBeat.

AECOM currently has a consensus price target of $59.5556, indicating a potential downside of 10.55%. Granite Construction has a consensus price target of $55.00, indicating a potential upside of 40.81%. Given Granite Construction's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Granite Construction is more favorable than AECOM.

Profitability

This table compares AECOM and Granite Construction's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Insider and Institutional Ownership

88.8% of AECOM shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 93.8% of Granite Construction shares are owned by institutional investors. 4.9% of AECOM shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 1.0% of Granite Construction shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Risk and Volatility

AECOM has a beta of 1.61, meaning that its share price is 61% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Granite Construction has a beta of 1.59, meaning that its share price is 59% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Earnings and Valuation

This table compares AECOM and Granite Construction's revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

Granite Construction has lower revenue, but higher earnings than AECOM.

Summary

AECOM beats Granite Construction on 7 of the 12 factors compared between the two stocks.

MasTec (NYSE:MTZ) and Granite Construction (NYSE:GVA) are both construction companies, but which is the superior investment? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their dividends, risk, valuation, profitability, earnings, analyst recommendations and institutional ownership.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a breakdown of current ratings and price targets for MasTec and Granite Construction, as provided by MarketBeat.com.

MasTec presently has a consensus price target of $77.3636, suggesting a potential downside of 22.83%. Granite Construction has a consensus price target of $55.00, suggesting a potential upside of 40.81%. Given Granite Construction's higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Granite Construction is more favorable than MasTec.

Volatility and Risk

MasTec has a beta of 1.38, suggesting that its stock price is 38% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Granite Construction has a beta of 1.59, suggesting that its stock price is 59% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Insider & Institutional Ownership

82.5% of MasTec shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 93.8% of Granite Construction shares are held by institutional investors. 23.9% of MasTec shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 1.0% of Granite Construction shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Profitability

This table compares MasTec and Granite Construction's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Earnings and Valuation

This table compares MasTec and Granite Construction's revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

MasTec has higher revenue and earnings than Granite Construction.

Summary

MasTec beats Granite Construction on 8 of the 11 factors compared between the two stocks.

Granite Construction (NYSE:GVA) and EMCOR Group (NYSE:EME) are both construction companies, but which is the better business? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their institutional ownership, analyst recommendations, risk, profitability, dividends, valuation and earnings.

Institutional and Insider Ownership

93.8% of Granite Construction shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 93.3% of EMCOR Group shares are owned by institutional investors. 1.0% of Granite Construction shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 1.9% of EMCOR Group shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Dividends

Granite Construction pays an annual dividend of $0.52 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.3%. EMCOR Group pays an annual dividend of $0.52 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.4%. EMCOR Group pays out 9.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Granite Construction has raised its dividend for 1 consecutive years and EMCOR Group has raised its dividend for 1 consecutive years.

Volatility & Risk

Granite Construction has a beta of 1.59, indicating that its stock price is 59% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, EMCOR Group has a beta of 1.18, indicating that its stock price is 18% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Profitability

This table compares Granite Construction and EMCOR Group's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a summary of recent ratings for Granite Construction and EMCOR Group, as reported by MarketBeat.

Granite Construction presently has a consensus target price of $55.00, suggesting a potential upside of 40.81%. EMCOR Group has a consensus target price of $84.00, suggesting a potential downside of 29.31%. Given Granite Construction's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Granite Construction is more favorable than EMCOR Group.

Earnings & Valuation

This table compares Granite Construction and EMCOR Group's revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

EMCOR Group has higher revenue and earnings than Granite Construction.

KBR (NYSE:KBR) and Granite Construction (NYSE:GVA) are both construction companies, but which is the superior business? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their dividends, valuation, risk, analyst recommendations, institutional ownership, earnings and profitability.

Earnings and Valuation

This table compares KBR and Granite Construction's top-line revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

KBR has higher revenue and earnings than Granite Construction.

Volatility & Risk

KBR has a beta of 1.39, suggesting that its share price is 39% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Granite Construction has a beta of 1.59, suggesting that its share price is 59% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Analyst Ratings

This is a breakdown of recent ratings and price targets for KBR and Granite Construction, as provided by MarketBeat.com.

KBR presently has a consensus price target of $35.8333, indicating a potential downside of 9.60%. Granite Construction has a consensus price target of $55.00, indicating a potential upside of 40.81%. Given Granite Construction's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Granite Construction is more favorable than KBR.

Profitability

This table compares KBR and Granite Construction's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Dividends

KBR pays an annual dividend of $0.44 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.1%. Granite Construction pays an annual dividend of $0.52 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.3%. KBR pays out 26.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. KBR has raised its dividend for 1 consecutive years and Granite Construction has raised its dividend for 1 consecutive years.

Insider and Institutional Ownership

98.2% of KBR shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 93.8% of Granite Construction shares are owned by institutional investors. 1.0% of KBR shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 1.0% of Granite Construction shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Granite Construction (NYSE:GVA) and Fluor (NYSE:FLR) are both construction companies, but which is the better investment? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, institutional ownership, earnings, profitability, valuation, dividends and risk.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a summary of current ratings and target prices for Granite Construction and Fluor, as reported by MarketBeat.com.

Granite Construction currently has a consensus target price of $55.00, suggesting a potential upside of 40.81%. Fluor has a consensus target price of $15.50, suggesting a potential downside of 29.58%. Given Granite Construction's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, research analysts clearly believe Granite Construction is more favorable than Fluor.

Insider & Institutional Ownership

93.8% of Granite Construction shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 64.6% of Fluor shares are held by institutional investors. 1.0% of Granite Construction shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.8% of Fluor shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Volatility & Risk

Granite Construction has a beta of 1.59, indicating that its share price is 59% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Fluor has a beta of 2.85, indicating that its share price is 185% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Earnings and Valuation

This table compares Granite Construction and Fluor's gross revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

Granite Construction has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Fluor.

Profitability

This table compares Granite Construction and Fluor's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Summary

Granite Construction beats Fluor on 7 of the 11 factors compared between the two stocks.