Tetra Tech (TTEK) Competitors

In the previous week, Tetra Tech had 3 more articles in the media than Donaldson. MarketBeat recorded 8 mentions for Tetra Tech and 5 mentions for Donaldson. Donaldson's average media sentiment score of 1.16 beat Tetra Tech's score of 1.10 indicating that Donaldson is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Tetra Tech presently has a consensus price target of $38.25, indicating a potential upside of 4.77%. Donaldson has a consensus price target of $97.83, indicating a potential upside of 1.87%. Given Tetra Tech's higher probable upside, equities analysts clearly believe Tetra Tech is more favorable than Donaldson.

Tetra Tech has a beta of 0.9, indicating that its stock price is 10% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Donaldson has a beta of 0.92, indicating that its stock price is 8% less volatile than the broader market.

Tetra Tech pays an annual dividend of $0.29 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.8%. Donaldson pays an annual dividend of $1.28 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.3%. Tetra Tech pays out 17.5% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Donaldson pays out 34.4% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Tetra Tech has raised its dividend for 11 consecutive years and Donaldson has raised its dividend for 38 consecutive years. Donaldson is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

Donaldson has a net margin of 11.52% compared to Tetra Tech's net margin of 8.60%. Donaldson's return on equity of 29.17% beat Tetra Tech's return on equity.

93.9% of Tetra Tech shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 82.8% of Donaldson shares are held by institutional investors. 0.5% of Tetra Tech shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 2.2% of Donaldson shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Donaldson has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Tetra Tech. Tetra Tech is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Donaldson, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

In the previous week, Rollins had 5 more articles in the media than Tetra Tech. MarketBeat recorded 13 mentions for Rollins and 8 mentions for Tetra Tech. Tetra Tech's average media sentiment score of 1.10 beat Rollins' score of 0.25 indicating that Tetra Tech is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Tetra Tech presently has a consensus target price of $38.25, suggesting a potential upside of 4.77%. Rollins has a consensus target price of $48.71, suggesting a potential upside of 34.45%. Given Rollins' higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Rollins is more favorable than Tetra Tech.

Tetra Tech has a beta of 0.9, indicating that its share price is 10% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Rollins has a beta of 0.75, indicating that its share price is 25% less volatile than the broader market.

Tetra Tech pays an annual dividend of $0.29 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.8%. Rollins pays an annual dividend of $0.73 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.0%. Tetra Tech pays out 17.5% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Rollins pays out 66.4% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Tetra Tech has increased its dividend for 11 consecutive years and Rollins has increased its dividend for 4 consecutive years.

Rollins has a net margin of 13.55% compared to Tetra Tech's net margin of 8.60%. Rollins' return on equity of 38.81% beat Tetra Tech's return on equity.

93.9% of Tetra Tech shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 51.8% of Rollins shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.5% of Tetra Tech shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 5.8% of Rollins shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Rollins has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Tetra Tech. Tetra Tech is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Rollins, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Tetra Tech presently has a consensus price target of $38.25, indicating a potential upside of 4.77%. Clean Harbors has a consensus price target of $354.57, indicating a potential upside of 10.24%. Given Clean Harbors' stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Clean Harbors is more favorable than Tetra Tech.

Tetra Tech has a net margin of 8.60% compared to Clean Harbors' net margin of 7.03%. Tetra Tech's return on equity of 22.32% beat Clean Harbors' return on equity.

Clean Harbors has higher revenue and earnings than Tetra Tech. Tetra Tech is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Clean Harbors, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Tetra Tech has a beta of 0.9, indicating that its stock price is 10% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Clean Harbors has a beta of 0.86, indicating that its stock price is 14% less volatile than the broader market.

93.9% of Tetra Tech shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 90.4% of Clean Harbors shares are held by institutional investors. 0.5% of Tetra Tech shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 5.0% of Clean Harbors shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

In the previous week, Clean Harbors had 1 more articles in the media than Tetra Tech. MarketBeat recorded 9 mentions for Clean Harbors and 8 mentions for Tetra Tech. Tetra Tech's average media sentiment score of 1.10 beat Clean Harbors' score of 1.04 indicating that Tetra Tech is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Tetra Tech currently has a consensus target price of $38.25, suggesting a potential upside of 4.77%. GFL Environmental has a consensus target price of $54.75, suggesting a potential upside of 30.59%. Given GFL Environmental's higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe GFL Environmental is more favorable than Tetra Tech.

Tetra Tech has a beta of 0.9, meaning that its share price is 10% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, GFL Environmental has a beta of 0.68, meaning that its share price is 32% less volatile than the broader market.

Tetra Tech has a net margin of 8.60% compared to GFL Environmental's net margin of -3.28%. Tetra Tech's return on equity of 22.32% beat GFL Environmental's return on equity.

93.9% of Tetra Tech shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 64.7% of GFL Environmental shares are held by institutional investors. 0.5% of Tetra Tech shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 8.7% of GFL Environmental shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Tetra Tech pays an annual dividend of $0.29 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.8%. GFL Environmental pays an annual dividend of $0.07 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.2%. Tetra Tech pays out 17.5% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. GFL Environmental pays out -13.2% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Tetra Tech has increased its dividend for 11 consecutive years and GFL Environmental has increased its dividend for 5 consecutive years. Tetra Tech is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

GFL Environmental has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Tetra Tech. GFL Environmental is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Tetra Tech, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

In the previous week, Tetra Tech had 3 more articles in the media than GFL Environmental. MarketBeat recorded 8 mentions for Tetra Tech and 5 mentions for GFL Environmental. Tetra Tech's average media sentiment score of 1.10 beat GFL Environmental's score of 0.91 indicating that Tetra Tech is being referred to more favorably in the media.