Rollins (ROL) Competitors

51.8% of Rollins shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 86.1% of Waste Connections shares are held by institutional investors. 5.8% of Rollins shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.3% of Waste Connections shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Rollins has a beta of 0.73, meaning that its share price is 27% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Waste Connections has a beta of 0.49, meaning that its share price is 51% less volatile than the broader market.

Rollins has a net margin of 13.55% compared to Waste Connections' net margin of 10.86%. Rollins' return on equity of 38.81% beat Waste Connections' return on equity.

Waste Connections has higher revenue and earnings than Rollins. Rollins is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Waste Connections, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Rollins presently has a consensus target price of $45.94, suggesting a potential upside of 42.43%. Waste Connections has a consensus target price of $200.41, suggesting a potential upside of 29.48%. Given Rollins' higher probable upside, research analysts clearly believe Rollins is more favorable than Waste Connections.

In the previous week, Rollins had 16 more articles in the media than Waste Connections. MarketBeat recorded 23 mentions for Rollins and 7 mentions for Waste Connections. Waste Connections' average media sentiment score of 0.16 beat Rollins' score of 0.12 indicating that Waste Connections is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Rollins pays an annual dividend of $0.73 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.3%. Waste Connections pays an annual dividend of $1.40 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.9%. Rollins pays out 66.4% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Waste Connections pays out 33.7% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Rollins has raised its dividend for 4 consecutive years and Waste Connections has raised its dividend for 8 consecutive years.

Veralto has a net margin of 17.35% compared to Rollins' net margin of 13.55%. Rollins' return on equity of 38.81% beat Veralto's return on equity.

Rollins presently has a consensus price target of $45.94, suggesting a potential upside of 42.43%. Veralto has a consensus price target of $112.70, suggesting a potential upside of 16.86%. Given Rollins' higher possible upside, equities analysts clearly believe Rollins is more favorable than Veralto.

In the previous week, Rollins had 17 more articles in the media than Veralto. MarketBeat recorded 23 mentions for Rollins and 6 mentions for Veralto. Veralto's average media sentiment score of 0.31 beat Rollins' score of 0.12 indicating that Veralto is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Rollins pays an annual dividend of $0.73 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.3%. Veralto pays an annual dividend of $0.52 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.5%. Rollins pays out 66.4% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Veralto pays out 13.1% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Rollins has raised its dividend for 4 consecutive years and Veralto has raised its dividend for 1 consecutive years. Rollins is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

Rollins has a beta of 0.73, indicating that its share price is 27% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Veralto has a beta of 0.62, indicating that its share price is 38% less volatile than the broader market.

51.8% of Rollins shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 91.3% of Veralto shares are owned by institutional investors. 5.8% of Rollins shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 0.4% of Veralto shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Veralto has higher revenue and earnings than Rollins. Veralto is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Rollins, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Rollins has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Clean Harbors. Rollins is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Clean Harbors, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Clean Harbors has a beta of 0.87, meaning that its stock price is 13% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Rollins has a beta of 0.73, meaning that its stock price is 27% less volatile than the broader market.

Rollins has a net margin of 13.55% compared to Clean Harbors' net margin of 7.03%. Rollins' return on equity of 38.81% beat Clean Harbors' return on equity.

Clean Harbors presently has a consensus target price of $355.29, suggesting a potential upside of 11.96%. Rollins has a consensus target price of $45.94, suggesting a potential upside of 42.43%. Given Rollins' higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Rollins is more favorable than Clean Harbors.

In the previous week, Rollins had 16 more articles in the media than Clean Harbors. MarketBeat recorded 23 mentions for Rollins and 7 mentions for Clean Harbors. Clean Harbors' average media sentiment score of 0.29 beat Rollins' score of 0.12 indicating that Clean Harbors is being referred to more favorably in the media.

90.4% of Clean Harbors shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 51.8% of Rollins shares are held by institutional investors. 5.0% of Clean Harbors shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 5.8% of Rollins shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Rollins pays an annual dividend of $0.73 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.3%. GFL Environmental pays an annual dividend of $0.07 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.2%. Rollins pays out 66.4% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. GFL Environmental pays out -13.2% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Rollins has increased its dividend for 4 consecutive years and GFL Environmental has increased its dividend for 5 consecutive years.

Rollins has a net margin of 13.55% compared to GFL Environmental's net margin of -3.28%. Rollins' return on equity of 38.81% beat GFL Environmental's return on equity.

Rollins has a beta of 0.73, indicating that its share price is 27% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, GFL Environmental has a beta of 0.72, indicating that its share price is 28% less volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, Rollins had 17 more articles in the media than GFL Environmental. MarketBeat recorded 23 mentions for Rollins and 6 mentions for GFL Environmental. GFL Environmental's average media sentiment score of 0.25 beat Rollins' score of 0.12 indicating that GFL Environmental is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Rollins currently has a consensus target price of $45.94, suggesting a potential upside of 42.43%. GFL Environmental has a consensus target price of $57.67, suggesting a potential upside of 36.24%. Given Rollins' higher possible upside, equities research analysts clearly believe Rollins is more favorable than GFL Environmental.

GFL Environmental has higher revenue and earnings than Rollins. GFL Environmental is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Rollins, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

51.8% of Rollins shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 64.7% of GFL Environmental shares are owned by institutional investors. 5.8% of Rollins shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 8.7% of GFL Environmental shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.