Rollins (ROL) Competitors

Rollins has a net margin of 13.77% compared to Waste Management's net margin of 10.99%. Rollins' return on equity of 38.37% beat Waste Management's return on equity.

In the previous week, Waste Management had 1 more articles in the media than Rollins. MarketBeat recorded 30 mentions for Waste Management and 29 mentions for Rollins. Waste Management's average media sentiment score of 0.72 beat Rollins' score of 0.55 indicating that Waste Management is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Waste Management has higher revenue and earnings than Rollins. Waste Management is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Rollins, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Rollins pays an annual dividend of $0.73 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.5%. Waste Management pays an annual dividend of $3.78 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.7%. Rollins pays out 67.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Waste Management pays out 54.7% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Rollins has increased its dividend for 4 consecutive years and Waste Management has increased its dividend for 22 consecutive years. Waste Management is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

Rollins presently has a consensus target price of $64.00, suggesting a potential upside of 35.64%. Waste Management has a consensus target price of $255.67, suggesting a potential upside of 15.97%. Given Rollins' higher possible upside, research analysts clearly believe Rollins is more favorable than Waste Management.

Rollins has a beta of 0.73, meaning that its share price is 27% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Waste Management has a beta of 0.45, meaning that its share price is 55% less volatile than the broader market.

51.8% of Rollins shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 80.4% of Waste Management shares are owned by institutional investors. 5.8% of Rollins shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 0.2% of Waste Management shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Rollins has a net margin of 13.77% compared to Republic Services' net margin of 13.00%. Rollins' return on equity of 38.37% beat Republic Services' return on equity.

In the previous week, Rollins had 10 more articles in the media than Republic Services. MarketBeat recorded 29 mentions for Rollins and 19 mentions for Republic Services. Republic Services' average media sentiment score of 1.34 beat Rollins' score of 0.55 indicating that Republic Services is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Republic Services has higher revenue and earnings than Rollins. Republic Services is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Rollins, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

57.7% of Republic Services shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 51.8% of Rollins shares are held by institutional investors. 0.1% of Republic Services shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 5.8% of Rollins shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Republic Services has a beta of 0.41, suggesting that its share price is 59% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Rollins has a beta of 0.73, suggesting that its share price is 27% less volatile than the broader market.

Republic Services currently has a consensus price target of $245.15, suggesting a potential upside of 16.41%. Rollins has a consensus price target of $64.00, suggesting a potential upside of 35.64%. Given Rollins' stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Rollins is more favorable than Republic Services.

Republic Services pays an annual dividend of $2.52 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.2%. Rollins pays an annual dividend of $0.73 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.5%. Republic Services pays out 36.2% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Rollins pays out 67.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Republic Services has raised its dividend for 22 consecutive years and Rollins has raised its dividend for 4 consecutive years.

Rollins has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Clean Harbors. Clean Harbors is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Rollins, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

In the previous week, Rollins had 21 more articles in the media than Clean Harbors. MarketBeat recorded 29 mentions for Rollins and 8 mentions for Clean Harbors. Clean Harbors' average media sentiment score of 1.74 beat Rollins' score of 0.55 indicating that Clean Harbors is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Rollins has a net margin of 13.77% compared to Clean Harbors' net margin of 6.53%. Rollins' return on equity of 38.37% beat Clean Harbors' return on equity.

Clean Harbors currently has a consensus target price of $323.23, indicating a potential upside of 14.12%. Rollins has a consensus target price of $64.00, indicating a potential upside of 35.64%. Given Rollins' higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Rollins is more favorable than Clean Harbors.

90.4% of Clean Harbors shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 51.8% of Rollins shares are held by institutional investors. 5.0% of Clean Harbors shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 5.8% of Rollins shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Clean Harbors has a beta of 0.87, suggesting that its stock price is 13% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Rollins has a beta of 0.73, suggesting that its stock price is 27% less volatile than the broader market.

Tetra Tech pays an annual dividend of $0.29 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.0%. Rollins pays an annual dividend of $0.73 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.5%. Tetra Tech pays out 17.4% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Rollins pays out 67.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Tetra Tech has increased its dividend for 11 consecutive years and Rollins has increased its dividend for 4 consecutive years.

Rollins has a net margin of 13.77% compared to Tetra Tech's net margin of 8.58%. Rollins' return on equity of 38.37% beat Tetra Tech's return on equity.

93.9% of Tetra Tech shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 51.8% of Rollins shares are held by institutional investors. 0.5% of Tetra Tech shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 5.8% of Rollins shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Rollins has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Tetra Tech. Tetra Tech is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Rollins, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Tetra Tech has a beta of 0.93, suggesting that its stock price is 7% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Rollins has a beta of 0.73, suggesting that its stock price is 27% less volatile than the broader market.

Tetra Tech currently has a consensus target price of $41.00, suggesting a potential upside of 46.95%. Rollins has a consensus target price of $64.00, suggesting a potential upside of 35.64%. Given Tetra Tech's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, equities research analysts clearly believe Tetra Tech is more favorable than Rollins.

In the previous week, Rollins had 18 more articles in the media than Tetra Tech. MarketBeat recorded 29 mentions for Rollins and 11 mentions for Tetra Tech. Tetra Tech's average media sentiment score of 1.16 beat Rollins' score of 0.55 indicating that Tetra Tech is being referred to more favorably in the media.