Do analysts recommend CDLR or LMB?

Limbach has a consensus target price of $67.50, suggesting a potential upside of 31.68%. Given Limbach's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Limbach is more favorable than Cadeler A/S. Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score Cadeler A/S 0 Sell rating(s) 3 Hold rating(s) 0 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 2.00 Limbach 1 Sell rating(s) 2 Hold rating(s) 2 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 2.20

Which has preferable earnings & valuation, CDLR or LMB?

Cadeler A/S has higher revenue and earnings than Limbach. Cadeler A/S is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Limbach, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks. Company Gross Revenue Price/Sales Ratio Net Income Earnings Per Share Price/Earnings Ratio Cadeler A/S $701.71M 3.00 $317M $2.51 8.69 Limbach $646.80M 0.95 $39.06M $2.50 20.50

Is CDLR or LMB more profitable?

Cadeler A/S has a net margin of 27.45% compared to Limbach's net margin of 4.42%. Limbach's return on equity of 23.22% beat Cadeler A/S's return on equity. Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets Cadeler A/S 27.45% 12.58% 5.95% Limbach 4.42% 23.22% 11.48%

Does the media favor CDLR or LMB?

In the previous week, Limbach had 4 more articles in the media than Cadeler A/S. MarketBeat recorded 5 mentions for Limbach and 1 mentions for Cadeler A/S. Limbach's average media sentiment score of 0.96 beat Cadeler A/S's score of 0.39 indicating that Limbach is being referred to more favorably in the news media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment Cadeler A/S 0 Very Positive mention(s) 1 Positive mention(s) 0 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Neutral Limbach 2 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 1 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive

Which has better earnings & valuation, CTRI or LMB?

Limbach has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Centuri. Limbach is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Centuri, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks. Company Gross Revenue Price/Sales Ratio Net Income Earnings Per Share Price/Earnings Ratio Centuri $2.98B 0.71 $22.40M $0.31 67.44 Limbach $646.80M 0.95 $39.06M $2.50 20.50

Is CTRI or LMB more profitable?

Limbach has a net margin of 4.42% compared to Centuri's net margin of 0.86%. Limbach's return on equity of 23.22% beat Centuri's return on equity. Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets Centuri 0.86% 5.85% 2.00% Limbach 4.42% 23.22% 11.48%

Does the media refer more to CTRI or LMB?

In the previous week, Limbach had 2 more articles in the media than Centuri. MarketBeat recorded 5 mentions for Limbach and 3 mentions for Centuri. Limbach's average media sentiment score of 0.96 beat Centuri's score of 0.67 indicating that Limbach is being referred to more favorably in the news media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment Centuri 2 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 1 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive Limbach 2 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 1 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive

Does the media refer more to CDNL or LMB?

In the previous week, Cardinal Infrastructure Group had 5 more articles in the media than Limbach. MarketBeat recorded 10 mentions for Cardinal Infrastructure Group and 5 mentions for Limbach. Limbach's average media sentiment score of 0.96 beat Cardinal Infrastructure Group's score of 0.07 indicating that Limbach is being referred to more favorably in the news media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment Cardinal Infrastructure Group 0 Very Positive mention(s) 1 Positive mention(s) 7 Neutral mention(s) 1 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Neutral Limbach 2 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 1 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive

Which has better earnings & valuation, LMB or AMRC?

Ameresco has higher revenue and earnings than Limbach. Limbach is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Ameresco, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks. Company Gross Revenue Price/Sales Ratio Net Income Earnings Per Share Price/Earnings Ratio Limbach $646.80M 0.95 $39.06M $2.50 20.50 Ameresco $1.93B 0.59 $44.28M $0.52 41.04

Is LMB or AMRC more profitable?

Limbach has a net margin of 4.42% compared to Ameresco's net margin of 1.40%. Limbach's return on equity of 23.22% beat Ameresco's return on equity. Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets Limbach 4.42% 23.22% 11.48% Ameresco 1.40% 2.82% 0.72%

Does the media refer more to LMB or AMRC?

In the previous week, Limbach and Limbach both had 5 articles in the media. Limbach's average media sentiment score of 0.96 beat Ameresco's score of 0.72 indicating that Limbach is being referred to more favorably in the media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment Limbach 2 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 1 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive Ameresco 3 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 2 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive

Limbach (LMB) Competitors

$51.26 +0.31 (+0.61%)

Closing price 10/9/2026 04:00 PM Eastern

Extended Trading

$51.33 +0.07 (+0.14%)

As of 10/9/2026 07:30 PM Eastern

Compare

LMB vs. CDLR, CTRI, CDNL, AMRC, and GLDD

Should you buy Limbach stock or one of its competitors? Limbach's main competitors and comparable companies include Cadeler A/S (CDLR), Centuri (CTRI), Cardinal Infrastructure Group (CDNL), Ameresco (AMRC), and Great Lakes Dredge & Dock (GLDD). Companies are selected based on similarities in market, industry, and size. These companies are all part of the "construction & engineering" industry.

How does Limbach compare to Cadeler A/S?

Cadeler A/S (NYSE:CDLR) and Limbach (NASDAQ:LMB) are both industrials companies, but which is the better business? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their institutional ownership, media sentiment, dividends, profitability, earnings, analyst recommendations, risk and valuation.

Cadeler A/S has a net margin of 27.45% compared to Limbach's net margin of 4.42%. Limbach's return on equity of 23.22% beat Cadeler A/S's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Cadeler A/S	27.45%	12.58%	5.95%
Limbach	4.42%	23.22%	11.48%

53.0% of Cadeler A/S shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 55.9% of Limbach shares are held by institutional investors. 7.0% of Limbach shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Cadeler A/S has higher revenue and earnings than Limbach. Cadeler A/S is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Limbach, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Cadeler A/S	$701.71M	3.00	$317M	$2.51	8.69
Limbach	$646.80M	0.95	$39.06M	$2.50	20.50

In the previous week, Limbach had 4 more articles in the media than Cadeler A/S. MarketBeat recorded 5 mentions for Limbach and 1 mentions for Cadeler A/S. Limbach's average media sentiment score of 0.96 beat Cadeler A/S's score of 0.39 indicating that Limbach is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Cadeler A/S	0 Very Positive mention(s)	1 Positive mention(s)	0 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Neutral
Limbach	2 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	1 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive

Limbach has a consensus target price of $67.50, suggesting a potential upside of 31.68%. Given Limbach's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Limbach is more favorable than Cadeler A/S.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Cadeler A/S	0 Sell rating(s)	3 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.00
Limbach	1 Sell rating(s)	2 Hold rating(s)	2 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.20

Cadeler A/S has a beta of 0.75, suggesting that its stock price is 25% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Limbach has a beta of 1.33, suggesting that its stock price is 33% more volatile than the broader market.

Summary

Limbach beats Cadeler A/S on 11 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Limbach compare to Centuri?

Centuri (NYSE:CTRI) and Limbach (NASDAQ:LMB) are both industrials companies, but which is the superior business? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their institutional ownership, earnings, analyst recommendations, valuation, dividends, risk, profitability and media sentiment.

Limbach has a net margin of 4.42% compared to Centuri's net margin of 0.86%. Limbach's return on equity of 23.22% beat Centuri's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Centuri	0.86%	5.85%	2.00%
Limbach	4.42%	23.22%	11.48%

Limbach has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Centuri. Limbach is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Centuri, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Centuri	$2.98B	0.71	$22.40M	$0.31	67.44
Limbach	$646.80M	0.95	$39.06M	$2.50	20.50

Centuri has a beta of 1.01, meaning that its stock price is 1% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Limbach has a beta of 1.33, meaning that its stock price is 33% more volatile than the broader market.

Centuri presently has a consensus price target of $29.50, indicating a potential upside of 41.10%. Limbach has a consensus price target of $67.50, indicating a potential upside of 31.68%. Given Centuri's higher probable upside, equities analysts clearly believe Centuri is more favorable than Limbach.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Centuri	3 Sell rating(s)	1 Hold rating(s)	3 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.00
Limbach	1 Sell rating(s)	2 Hold rating(s)	2 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.20

In the previous week, Limbach had 2 more articles in the media than Centuri. MarketBeat recorded 5 mentions for Limbach and 3 mentions for Centuri. Limbach's average media sentiment score of 0.96 beat Centuri's score of 0.67 indicating that Limbach is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Centuri	2 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	1 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive
Limbach	2 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	1 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive

55.9% of Limbach shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.3% of Centuri shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 7.0% of Limbach shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Summary

Limbach beats Centuri on 12 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Limbach compare to Cardinal Infrastructure Group?

Cardinal Infrastructure Group (NASDAQ:CDNL) and Limbach (NASDAQ:LMB) are both small-cap industrials companies, but which is the better business? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their valuation, earnings, institutional ownership, profitability, dividends, risk, analyst recommendations and media sentiment.

Limbach has a net margin of 4.42% compared to Cardinal Infrastructure Group's net margin of 0.00%. Limbach's return on equity of 23.22% beat Cardinal Infrastructure Group's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Cardinal Infrastructure Group	N/A	N/A	N/A
Limbach	4.42%	23.22%	11.48%

In the previous week, Cardinal Infrastructure Group had 5 more articles in the media than Limbach. MarketBeat recorded 10 mentions for Cardinal Infrastructure Group and 5 mentions for Limbach. Limbach's average media sentiment score of 0.96 beat Cardinal Infrastructure Group's score of 0.07 indicating that Limbach is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Cardinal Infrastructure Group	0 Very Positive mention(s)	1 Positive mention(s)	7 Neutral mention(s)	1 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Neutral
Limbach	2 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	1 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive

Limbach has higher revenue and earnings than Cardinal Infrastructure Group. Limbach is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Cardinal Infrastructure Group, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Cardinal Infrastructure Group	$456.05M	2.20	$22.69M	$0.55	38.40
Limbach	$646.80M	0.95	$39.06M	$2.50	20.50

Cardinal Infrastructure Group currently has a consensus price target of $49.25, suggesting a potential upside of 133.19%. Limbach has a consensus price target of $67.50, suggesting a potential upside of 31.68%. Given Cardinal Infrastructure Group's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, equities research analysts clearly believe Cardinal Infrastructure Group is more favorable than Limbach.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Cardinal Infrastructure Group	0 Sell rating(s)	2 Hold rating(s)	4 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.67
Limbach	1 Sell rating(s)	2 Hold rating(s)	2 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.20

55.9% of Limbach shares are held by institutional investors. 61.7% of Cardinal Infrastructure Group shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 7.0% of Limbach shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Summary

Limbach beats Cardinal Infrastructure Group on 8 of the 15 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Limbach compare to Ameresco?

Limbach (NASDAQ:LMB) and Ameresco (NYSE:AMRC) are both small-cap industrials companies, but which is the better business? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their dividends, risk, profitability, institutional ownership, media sentiment, valuation, earnings and analyst recommendations.

Limbach has a net margin of 4.42% compared to Ameresco's net margin of 1.40%. Limbach's return on equity of 23.22% beat Ameresco's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Limbach	4.42%	23.22%	11.48%
Ameresco	1.40%	2.82%	0.72%

Limbach has a beta of 1.33, meaning that its share price is 33% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Ameresco has a beta of 2.62, meaning that its share price is 162% more volatile than the broader market.

55.9% of Limbach shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 99.2% of Ameresco shares are owned by institutional investors. 7.0% of Limbach shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 45.1% of Ameresco shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Limbach presently has a consensus price target of $67.50, indicating a potential upside of 31.68%. Ameresco has a consensus price target of $41.89, indicating a potential upside of 96.27%. Given Ameresco's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Ameresco is more favorable than Limbach.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Limbach	1 Sell rating(s)	2 Hold rating(s)	2 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.20
Ameresco	1 Sell rating(s)	6 Hold rating(s)	6 Buy rating(s)	1 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.50

Ameresco has higher revenue and earnings than Limbach. Limbach is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Ameresco, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Limbach	$646.80M	0.95	$39.06M	$2.50	20.50
Ameresco	$1.93B	0.59	$44.28M	$0.52	41.04

In the previous week, Limbach and Limbach both had 5 articles in the media. Limbach's average media sentiment score of 0.96 beat Ameresco's score of 0.72 indicating that Limbach is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Limbach	2 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	1 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive
Ameresco	3 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	2 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive

Summary

Ameresco beats Limbach on 10 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Limbach compare to Great Lakes Dredge & Dock?

Great Lakes Dredge & Dock (NASDAQ:GLDD) and Limbach (NASDAQ:LMB) are both small-cap industrials companies, but which is the better investment? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their media sentiment, profitability, risk, institutional ownership, earnings, analyst recommendations, valuation and dividends.

Great Lakes Dredge & Dock has a net margin of 8.27% compared to Limbach's net margin of 4.42%. Limbach's return on equity of 23.22% beat Great Lakes Dredge & Dock's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Great Lakes Dredge & Dock	8.27%	16.46%	6.48%
Limbach	4.42%	23.22%	11.48%

89.1% of Great Lakes Dredge & Dock shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 55.9% of Limbach shares are held by institutional investors. 2.2% of Great Lakes Dredge & Dock shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 7.0% of Limbach shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Great Lakes Dredge & Dock has higher revenue and earnings than Limbach. Great Lakes Dredge & Dock is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Limbach, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Great Lakes Dredge & Dock	$888.28M	1.28	$73.47M	$1.07	15.89
Limbach	$646.80M	0.95	$39.06M	$2.50	20.50

In the previous week, Limbach had 5 more articles in the media than Great Lakes Dredge & Dock. MarketBeat recorded 5 mentions for Limbach and 0 mentions for Great Lakes Dredge & Dock. Limbach's average media sentiment score of 0.96 beat Great Lakes Dredge & Dock's score of 0.80 indicating that Limbach is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company	Overall Sentiment
Great Lakes Dredge & Dock	Positive
Limbach	Positive

Great Lakes Dredge & Dock currently has a consensus price target of $17.00, indicating a potential upside of 0.00%. Limbach has a consensus price target of $67.50, indicating a potential upside of 31.68%. Given Limbach's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Limbach is more favorable than Great Lakes Dredge & Dock.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Great Lakes Dredge & Dock	1 Sell rating(s)	4 Hold rating(s)	1 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.00
Limbach	1 Sell rating(s)	2 Hold rating(s)	2 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.20

Great Lakes Dredge & Dock has a beta of 1.38, meaning that its stock price is 38% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Limbach has a beta of 1.33, meaning that its stock price is 33% more volatile than the broader market.

Summary

Limbach beats Great Lakes Dredge & Dock on 10 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Limbach News Delivered to You Automatically

Subscribe Now

SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding LMB and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of NASDAQ and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.

LMB vs. The Competition

Export

Metric	Limbach	Construction & Engineering Industry	Industrials Sector	NASDAQ Exchange
Market Cap	$607.58M	$7.63B	$10.13B	$13.21B
Dividend Yield	N/A	2.68%	96.65%	16.37%
P/E Ratio	20.50	21.90	26.75	26.16
Price / Sales	0.95	61.50	274.13	107.44
Price / Cash	8.16	16.70	23.85	53.09
Price / Book	3.05	4.97	4.77	6.33
Net Income	$39.06M	$487.43M	$616.42M	$382.15M
7 Day Performance	4.40%	-0.54%	-1.15%	-1.40%
1 Month Performance	6.11%	-1.47%	-2.23%	-3.47%
1 Year Performance	-43.58%	10.98%	3.14%	1.18%

Limbach Competitors List

Export

Company	MarketRank	Share Price	Analysts' Price Target	1Y Price Performance	Market Cap	Revenue	P/E Ratio	Employee Count	Indicator(s)
LMB Limbach	4.5808 of 5 stars	$51.26 +0.6%	$67.50 +31.7%	-46.8%	$607.58M	$646.80M	20.50	1,500	Analyst Forecast
CDLR Cadeler A/S	0.9366 of 5 stars	$21.92 -1.2%	N/A	+2.1%	$2.11B	$729.35M	8.73	1,073	Gap Down
CTRI Centuri	4.5448 of 5 stars	$20.78 -0.6%	$29.50 +42.0%	+2.0%	$2.11B	$3.39B	67.03	9,687	Analyst Downgrade Gap Up
CDNL Cardinal Infrastructure Group	4.7765 of 5 stars	$28.71 -6.6%	$49.25 +71.5%	N/A	$1.46B	$456.05M	52.20	1,480	Analyst Downgrade
AMRC Ameresco	4.6184 of 5 stars	$21.50 -0.3%	$41.89 +94.9%	-46.0%	$1.14B	$1.93B	41.34	1,601

Related Companies and Tools

Related Companies

Top 10 Stock Comparisons

This page (NASDAQ:LMB) was last updated on 10/10/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.

From Our Partners

Unlock superior investment research and tools.

Get MarketBeat All Access

In-depth profiles and analysis for 20,000 public companies.
Real-time analyst ratings, insider transactions, earnings data, and more.
Our daily ratings and market update email newsletter.

Sign In
Create Account

Your Email Address:

Your Password:

Forgot your password?

Your Email Address:

Choose a Password:

By creating a free account, you agree to our terms of service. This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

Limbach (LMB) Competitors