Go Pro

Limbach (LMB) Competitors

Limbach logo
$41.34 0.00 (0.00%)
As of 08/28/2026 04:00 PM Eastern

LMB vs. ITG, GLDD, AMRC, BWMN, and BBCP

Should you buy Limbach stock or one of its competitors? Limbach's main competitors and comparable companies include ITG (ITG), Great Lakes Dredge & Dock (GLDD), Ameresco (AMRC), Bowman Consulting Group (BWMN), and Concrete Pumping (BBCP). Companies are selected based on similarities in market, industry, and size. These companies are all part of the "construction & engineering" industry.

How does Limbach compare to ITG?

ITG (NASDAQ:ITG) and Limbach (NASDAQ:LMB) are both small-cap industrials companies, but which is the superior stock? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, earnings, valuation, dividends, media sentiment, risk, profitability and institutional ownership.

In the previous week, Limbach had 5 more articles in the media than ITG. MarketBeat recorded 9 mentions for Limbach and 4 mentions for ITG. Limbach's average media sentiment score of 0.83 beat ITG's score of 0.22 indicating that Limbach is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
ITG
0 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
2 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral
Limbach
4 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
2 Neutral mention(s)
2 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

Limbach has higher revenue and earnings than ITG.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
ITGN/AN/AN/AN/AN/A
Limbach$646.80M0.76$39.06M$2.5016.54

55.9% of Limbach shares are owned by institutional investors. 7.0% of Limbach shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Limbach has a net margin of 4.42% compared to ITG's net margin of 0.00%. Limbach's return on equity of 23.22% beat ITG's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
ITGN/A N/A N/A
Limbach 4.42%23.22%11.48%

ITG currently has a consensus price target of $17.56, indicating a potential upside of 42.73%. Limbach has a consensus price target of $62.00, indicating a potential upside of 49.98%. Given Limbach's higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Limbach is more favorable than ITG.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
ITG
0 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
8 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00
Limbach
2 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
1.75

Summary

Limbach beats ITG on 9 of the 12 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Limbach compare to Great Lakes Dredge & Dock?

Limbach (NASDAQ:LMB) and Great Lakes Dredge & Dock (NASDAQ:GLDD) are both small-cap industrials companies, but which is the superior business? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their valuation, institutional ownership, analyst recommendations, dividends, media sentiment, profitability, risk and earnings.

Limbach currently has a consensus price target of $62.00, indicating a potential upside of 49.98%. Great Lakes Dredge & Dock has a consensus price target of $17.00, indicating a potential upside of 0.00%. Given Limbach's higher possible upside, research analysts plainly believe Limbach is more favorable than Great Lakes Dredge & Dock.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Limbach
2 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
1.75
Great Lakes Dredge & Dock
1 Sell rating(s)
4 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.00

55.9% of Limbach shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 89.1% of Great Lakes Dredge & Dock shares are held by institutional investors. 7.0% of Limbach shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 2.2% of Great Lakes Dredge & Dock shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

In the previous week, Limbach had 9 more articles in the media than Great Lakes Dredge & Dock. MarketBeat recorded 9 mentions for Limbach and 0 mentions for Great Lakes Dredge & Dock. Limbach's average media sentiment score of 0.83 beat Great Lakes Dredge & Dock's score of 0.00 indicating that Limbach is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Limbach Positive
Great Lakes Dredge & Dock Neutral

Great Lakes Dredge & Dock has a net margin of 8.27% compared to Limbach's net margin of 4.42%. Limbach's return on equity of 23.22% beat Great Lakes Dredge & Dock's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Limbach4.42% 23.22% 11.48%
Great Lakes Dredge & Dock 8.27%16.46%6.48%

Great Lakes Dredge & Dock has higher revenue and earnings than Limbach. Great Lakes Dredge & Dock is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Limbach, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Limbach$646.80M0.76$39.06M$2.5016.54
Great Lakes Dredge & Dock$888.28M1.28$73.47M$1.0715.89

Limbach has a beta of 1.45, indicating that its stock price is 45% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Great Lakes Dredge & Dock has a beta of 1.38, indicating that its stock price is 38% more volatile than the broader market.

Summary

Limbach beats Great Lakes Dredge & Dock on 9 of the 15 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Limbach compare to Ameresco?

Limbach (NASDAQ:LMB) and Ameresco (NYSE:AMRC) are both small-cap industrials companies, but which is the superior stock? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their institutional ownership, valuation, analyst recommendations, dividends, earnings, media sentiment, risk and profitability.

In the previous week, Ameresco had 14 more articles in the media than Limbach. MarketBeat recorded 23 mentions for Ameresco and 9 mentions for Limbach. Ameresco's average media sentiment score of 1.24 beat Limbach's score of 0.83 indicating that Ameresco is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Limbach
4 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
2 Neutral mention(s)
2 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
Ameresco
12 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
2 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

Limbach has a beta of 1.45, indicating that its share price is 45% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Ameresco has a beta of 2.62, indicating that its share price is 162% more volatile than the broader market.

55.9% of Limbach shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 99.2% of Ameresco shares are held by institutional investors. 7.0% of Limbach shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 45.1% of Ameresco shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Limbach has a net margin of 4.42% compared to Ameresco's net margin of 1.40%. Limbach's return on equity of 23.22% beat Ameresco's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Limbach4.42% 23.22% 11.48%
Ameresco 1.40%2.82%0.72%

Ameresco has higher revenue and earnings than Limbach. Limbach is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Ameresco, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Limbach$646.80M0.76$39.06M$2.5016.54
Ameresco$2.02B0.58$44.28M$0.5242.42

Limbach presently has a consensus target price of $62.00, suggesting a potential upside of 49.98%. Ameresco has a consensus target price of $41.89, suggesting a potential upside of 89.89%. Given Ameresco's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Ameresco is more favorable than Limbach.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Limbach
2 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
1.75
Ameresco
1 Sell rating(s)
5 Hold rating(s)
7 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.57

Summary

Ameresco beats Limbach on 12 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Limbach compare to Bowman Consulting Group?

Limbach (NASDAQ:LMB) and Bowman Consulting Group (NASDAQ:BWMN) are both small-cap industrials companies, but which is the superior investment? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their earnings, media sentiment, valuation, dividends, risk, institutional ownership, analyst recommendations and profitability.

Limbach currently has a consensus price target of $62.00, suggesting a potential upside of 49.98%. Bowman Consulting Group has a consensus price target of $43.00, suggesting a potential upside of 0.99%. Given Limbach's higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Limbach is more favorable than Bowman Consulting Group.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Limbach
2 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
1.75
Bowman Consulting Group
1 Sell rating(s)
7 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
1.88

Limbach has a net margin of 4.42% compared to Bowman Consulting Group's net margin of 1.30%. Limbach's return on equity of 23.22% beat Bowman Consulting Group's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Limbach4.42% 23.22% 11.48%
Bowman Consulting Group 1.30%2.67%1.20%

55.9% of Limbach shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 63.2% of Bowman Consulting Group shares are held by institutional investors. 7.0% of Limbach shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 17.5% of Bowman Consulting Group shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Limbach has higher revenue and earnings than Bowman Consulting Group. Limbach is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Bowman Consulting Group, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Limbach$646.80M0.76$39.06M$2.5016.54
Bowman Consulting Group$527.60M1.40$12.85M$0.40106.45

In the previous week, Limbach had 1 more articles in the media than Bowman Consulting Group. MarketBeat recorded 9 mentions for Limbach and 8 mentions for Bowman Consulting Group. Bowman Consulting Group's average media sentiment score of 1.06 beat Limbach's score of 0.83 indicating that Bowman Consulting Group is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Limbach
4 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
2 Neutral mention(s)
2 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
Bowman Consulting Group
5 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
2 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

Limbach has a beta of 1.45, meaning that its stock price is 45% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Bowman Consulting Group has a beta of 1.36, meaning that its stock price is 36% more volatile than the broader market.

Summary

Limbach beats Bowman Consulting Group on 10 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Limbach compare to Concrete Pumping?

Limbach (NASDAQ:LMB) and Concrete Pumping (NASDAQ:BBCP) are both small-cap industrials companies, but which is the superior business? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their profitability, media sentiment, valuation, earnings, institutional ownership, analyst recommendations, risk and dividends.

Limbach has higher revenue and earnings than Concrete Pumping. Limbach is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Concrete Pumping, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Limbach$646.80M0.76$39.06M$2.5016.54
Concrete Pumping$392.87M1.18$6.37M$0.1465.79

In the previous week, Limbach and Limbach both had 9 articles in the media. Limbach's average media sentiment score of 0.83 beat Concrete Pumping's score of 0.46 indicating that Limbach is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Limbach
4 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
2 Neutral mention(s)
2 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
Concrete Pumping
2 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
4 Neutral mention(s)
2 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral

55.9% of Limbach shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 34.2% of Concrete Pumping shares are owned by institutional investors. 7.0% of Limbach shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 28.2% of Concrete Pumping shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Limbach has a net margin of 4.42% compared to Concrete Pumping's net margin of 2.23%. Limbach's return on equity of 23.22% beat Concrete Pumping's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Limbach4.42% 23.22% 11.48%
Concrete Pumping 2.23%3.47%1.03%

Limbach presently has a consensus price target of $62.00, suggesting a potential upside of 49.98%. Concrete Pumping has a consensus price target of $10.25, suggesting a potential upside of 11.29%. Given Limbach's higher probable upside, research analysts plainly believe Limbach is more favorable than Concrete Pumping.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Limbach
2 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
1.75
Concrete Pumping
0 Sell rating(s)
3 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.60

Limbach has a beta of 1.45, suggesting that its stock price is 45% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Concrete Pumping has a beta of 0.86, suggesting that its stock price is 14% less volatile than the broader market.

Summary

Limbach beats Concrete Pumping on 10 of the 15 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Limbach News Delivered to You Automatically

Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for LMB and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.

Subscribe Now
SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding LMB and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.
Skip Chart

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of NASDAQ and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Skip Chart

LMB vs. The Competition

MetricLimbachConstruction & Engineering IndustryIndustrials SectorNASDAQ Exchange
Market Cap$493.19M$8.11B$10.59B$12.89B
Dividend YieldN/A2.65%97.24%11.28%
P/E Ratio16.5422.0826.3725.45
Price / Sales0.7659.60371.00104.31
Price / Cash6.6217.1424.2136.03
Price / Book2.464.485.036.36
Net Income$39.06M$487.14M$610.96M$349.79M
7 Day Performance-0.89%-1.62%-0.34%-0.40%
1 Month Performance-42.34%-3.62%1.98%4.24%
1 Year Performance-63.91%44.10%10.96%15.13%

Limbach Competitors List

CompanyMarketRankShare PriceAnalysts' Price Target1Y Price PerformanceMarket CapRevenueP/E RatioEmployee CountIndicator(s)
LMB
Limbach
4.0011 of 5 stars
$41.34
flat
$62.00
+50.0%
-63.9%$493.19M$646.80M16.541,500
ITG
ITG
4.5234 of 5 stars
$11.60
-10.1%
$17.56
+51.3%
N/A$1.56B$1.38BN/A2,900
GLDD
Great Lakes Dredge & Dock
N/A$17.00
flat
$17.00
N/A$1.14B$888.28M15.89430
AMRC
Ameresco
4.6495 of 5 stars
$20.92
-2.1%
$42.89
+105.0%
-13.2%$1.13B$2.02B40.241,601
BWMN
Bowman Consulting Group
3.0883 of 5 stars
$42.53
-0.2%
$44.71
+5.1%
-0.4%$738.69M$527.60M106.332,300

Related Companies and Tools


This page (NASDAQ:LMB) was last updated on 8/31/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.
From Our Partners