Does the media favor ROAD or MTZ?

In the previous week, MasTec had 10 more articles in the media than Construction Partners. MarketBeat recorded 13 mentions for MasTec and 3 mentions for Construction Partners. Construction Partners' average media sentiment score of 1.53 beat MasTec's score of 1.16 indicating that Construction Partners is being referred to more favorably in the media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment Construction Partners 2 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 0 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Very Positive MasTec 9 Very Positive mention(s) 1 Positive mention(s) 2 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive

Does the media favor ROAD or APG?

In the previous week, APi Group had 3 more articles in the media than Construction Partners. MarketBeat recorded 6 mentions for APi Group and 3 mentions for Construction Partners. Construction Partners' average media sentiment score of 1.53 beat APi Group's score of 0.71 indicating that Construction Partners is being referred to more favorably in the media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment Construction Partners 2 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 0 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Very Positive APi Group 3 Very Positive mention(s) 2 Positive mention(s) 1 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive

Does the media prefer STRL or ROAD?

In the previous week, Sterling Infrastructure had 19 more articles in the media than Construction Partners. MarketBeat recorded 22 mentions for Sterling Infrastructure and 3 mentions for Construction Partners. Construction Partners' average media sentiment score of 1.53 beat Sterling Infrastructure's score of 0.98 indicating that Construction Partners is being referred to more favorably in the news media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment Sterling Infrastructure 15 Very Positive mention(s) 2 Positive mention(s) 3 Neutral mention(s) 1 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive Construction Partners 2 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 0 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Very Positive

Is IESC or ROAD more profitable?

IES has a net margin of 11.40% compared to Construction Partners' net margin of 4.10%. IES's return on equity of 35.70% beat Construction Partners' return on equity. Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets IES 11.40% 35.70% 19.68% Construction Partners 4.10% 16.06% 4.59%

Does the media refer more to IESC or ROAD?

In the previous week, IES had 6 more articles in the media than Construction Partners. MarketBeat recorded 9 mentions for IES and 3 mentions for Construction Partners. Construction Partners' average media sentiment score of 1.53 beat IES's score of 0.64 indicating that Construction Partners is being referred to more favorably in the news media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment IES 2 Very Positive mention(s) 1 Positive mention(s) 1 Neutral mention(s) 2 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive Construction Partners 2 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 0 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Very Positive

Does the media refer more to DY or ROAD?

In the previous week, Dycom Industries had 5 more articles in the media than Construction Partners. MarketBeat recorded 8 mentions for Dycom Industries and 3 mentions for Construction Partners. Construction Partners' average media sentiment score of 1.53 beat Dycom Industries' score of 0.99 indicating that Construction Partners is being referred to more favorably in the news media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment Dycom Industries 6 Very Positive mention(s) 1 Positive mention(s) 1 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive Construction Partners 2 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 0 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Very Positive

Construction Partners (ROAD) Competitors

$99.67 0.00 (0.00%)

Closing price 09/11/2026 04:00 PM Eastern

Extended Trading

$99.70 +0.03 (+0.03%)

As of 09/11/2026 07:30 PM Eastern

Compare

ROAD vs. MTZ, APG, STRL, IESC, and DY

Should you buy Construction Partners stock or one of its competitors? Construction Partners's main competitors and comparable companies include MasTec (MTZ), APi Group (APG), Sterling Infrastructure (STRL), IES (IESC), and Dycom Industries (DY). Companies are selected based on similarities in market, industry, and size. These companies are all part of the "construction & engineering" industry.

How does Construction Partners compare to MasTec?

Construction Partners (NASDAQ:ROAD) and MasTec (NYSE:MTZ) are both industrials companies, but which is the better business? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their valuation, dividends, profitability, earnings, media sentiment, institutional ownership, risk and analyst recommendations.

Construction Partners currently has a consensus price target of $133.50, suggesting a potential upside of 33.94%. MasTec has a consensus price target of $422.00, suggesting a potential upside of 75.57%. Given MasTec's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe MasTec is more favorable than Construction Partners.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Construction Partners	0 Sell rating(s)	3 Hold rating(s)	4 Buy rating(s)	1 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.75
MasTec	0 Sell rating(s)	2 Hold rating(s)	19 Buy rating(s)	1 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.95

94.8% of Construction Partners shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 78.1% of MasTec shares are held by institutional investors. 15.7% of Construction Partners shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 21.4% of MasTec shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Construction Partners has a beta of 0.9, meaning that its stock price is 10% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, MasTec has a beta of 1.82, meaning that its stock price is 82% more volatile than the broader market.

MasTec has higher revenue and earnings than Construction Partners. MasTec is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Construction Partners, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Construction Partners	$2.81B	2.01	$101.78M	$2.55	39.09
MasTec	$14.30B	1.35	$399.04M	$6.27	38.33

Construction Partners has a net margin of 4.10% compared to MasTec's net margin of 3.07%. MasTec's return on equity of 18.08% beat Construction Partners' return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Construction Partners	4.10%	16.06%	4.59%
MasTec	3.07%	18.08%	5.97%

In the previous week, MasTec had 10 more articles in the media than Construction Partners. MarketBeat recorded 13 mentions for MasTec and 3 mentions for Construction Partners. Construction Partners' average media sentiment score of 1.53 beat MasTec's score of 1.16 indicating that Construction Partners is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Construction Partners	2 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	0 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Very Positive
MasTec	9 Very Positive mention(s)	1 Positive mention(s)	2 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive

Summary

MasTec beats Construction Partners on 11 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Construction Partners compare to APi Group?

Construction Partners (NASDAQ:ROAD) and APi Group (NYSE:APG) are both industrials companies, but which is the better stock? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their valuation, dividends, risk, profitability, analyst recommendations, media sentiment, earnings and institutional ownership.

94.8% of Construction Partners shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 86.6% of APi Group shares are owned by institutional investors. 15.7% of Construction Partners shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 18.7% of APi Group shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Construction Partners has a beta of 0.9, indicating that its share price is 10% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, APi Group has a beta of 1.6, indicating that its share price is 60% more volatile than the broader market.

Construction Partners presently has a consensus target price of $133.50, suggesting a potential upside of 33.94%. APi Group has a consensus target price of $52.57, suggesting a potential upside of 38.36%. Given APi Group's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe APi Group is more favorable than Construction Partners.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Construction Partners	0 Sell rating(s)	3 Hold rating(s)	4 Buy rating(s)	1 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.75
APi Group	0 Sell rating(s)	2 Hold rating(s)	6 Buy rating(s)	1 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.89

Construction Partners has a net margin of 4.10% compared to APi Group's net margin of 3.99%. APi Group's return on equity of 37.59% beat Construction Partners' return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Construction Partners	4.10%	16.06%	4.59%
APi Group	3.99%	37.59%	14.07%

In the previous week, APi Group had 3 more articles in the media than Construction Partners. MarketBeat recorded 6 mentions for APi Group and 3 mentions for Construction Partners. Construction Partners' average media sentiment score of 1.53 beat APi Group's score of 0.71 indicating that Construction Partners is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Construction Partners	2 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	0 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Very Positive
APi Group	3 Very Positive mention(s)	2 Positive mention(s)	1 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive

APi Group has higher revenue and earnings than Construction Partners. APi Group is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Construction Partners, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Construction Partners	$2.81B	2.01	$101.78M	$2.55	39.09
APi Group	$7.91B	2.08	$302M	-$0.67	N/A

Summary

APi Group beats Construction Partners on 11 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Construction Partners compare to Sterling Infrastructure?

Sterling Infrastructure (NASDAQ:STRL) and Construction Partners (NASDAQ:ROAD) are both industrials companies, but which is the superior business? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their profitability, analyst recommendations, media sentiment, dividends, risk, earnings, valuation and institutional ownership.

81.0% of Sterling Infrastructure shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 94.8% of Construction Partners shares are held by institutional investors. 1.6% of Sterling Infrastructure shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 15.7% of Construction Partners shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Sterling Infrastructure has a beta of 1.85, suggesting that its stock price is 85% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Construction Partners has a beta of 0.9, suggesting that its stock price is 10% less volatile than the broader market.

Sterling Infrastructure has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Construction Partners. Sterling Infrastructure is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Construction Partners, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Sterling Infrastructure	$2.49B	6.28	$290.15M	$13.87	36.84
Construction Partners	$2.81B	2.01	$101.78M	$2.55	39.09

Sterling Infrastructure presently has a consensus target price of $690.33, suggesting a potential upside of 35.08%. Construction Partners has a consensus target price of $133.50, suggesting a potential upside of 33.94%. Given Sterling Infrastructure's higher possible upside, research analysts plainly believe Sterling Infrastructure is more favorable than Construction Partners.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Sterling Infrastructure	0 Sell rating(s)	2 Hold rating(s)	6 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.75
Construction Partners	0 Sell rating(s)	3 Hold rating(s)	4 Buy rating(s)	1 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.75

Sterling Infrastructure has a net margin of 12.55% compared to Construction Partners' net margin of 4.10%. Sterling Infrastructure's return on equity of 40.12% beat Construction Partners' return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Sterling Infrastructure	12.55%	40.12%	17.15%
Construction Partners	4.10%	16.06%	4.59%

In the previous week, Sterling Infrastructure had 19 more articles in the media than Construction Partners. MarketBeat recorded 22 mentions for Sterling Infrastructure and 3 mentions for Construction Partners. Construction Partners' average media sentiment score of 1.53 beat Sterling Infrastructure's score of 0.98 indicating that Construction Partners is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Sterling Infrastructure	15 Very Positive mention(s)	2 Positive mention(s)	3 Neutral mention(s)	1 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive
Construction Partners	2 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	0 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Very Positive

Summary

Sterling Infrastructure beats Construction Partners on 10 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Construction Partners compare to IES?

IES (NASDAQ:IESC) and Construction Partners (NASDAQ:ROAD) are both industrials companies, but which is the better business? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their institutional ownership, earnings, analyst recommendations, risk, profitability, dividends, media sentiment and valuation.

86.6% of IES shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 94.8% of Construction Partners shares are owned by institutional investors. 56.4% of IES shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 15.7% of Construction Partners shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

IES has higher revenue and earnings than Construction Partners. IES is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Construction Partners, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
IES	$3.37B	4.09	$303.06M	$11.26	30.70
Construction Partners	$2.81B	2.01	$101.78M	$2.55	39.09

IES has a net margin of 11.40% compared to Construction Partners' net margin of 4.10%. IES's return on equity of 35.70% beat Construction Partners' return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
IES	11.40%	35.70%	19.68%
Construction Partners	4.10%	16.06%	4.59%

In the previous week, IES had 6 more articles in the media than Construction Partners. MarketBeat recorded 9 mentions for IES and 3 mentions for Construction Partners. Construction Partners' average media sentiment score of 1.53 beat IES's score of 0.64 indicating that Construction Partners is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
IES	2 Very Positive mention(s)	1 Positive mention(s)	1 Neutral mention(s)	2 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive
Construction Partners	2 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	0 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Very Positive

IES presently has a consensus price target of $277.25, indicating a potential downside of 19.80%. Construction Partners has a consensus price target of $133.50, indicating a potential upside of 33.94%. Given Construction Partners' stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Construction Partners is more favorable than IES.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
IES	0 Sell rating(s)	1 Hold rating(s)	2 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.67
Construction Partners	0 Sell rating(s)	3 Hold rating(s)	4 Buy rating(s)	1 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.75

IES has a beta of 1.78, meaning that its share price is 78% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Construction Partners has a beta of 0.9, meaning that its share price is 10% less volatile than the broader market.

Summary

IES beats Construction Partners on 10 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Construction Partners compare to Dycom Industries?

Dycom Industries (NYSE:DY) and Construction Partners (NASDAQ:ROAD) are both mid-cap industrials companies, but which is the better investment? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their institutional ownership, valuation, media sentiment, risk, dividends, analyst recommendations, earnings and profitability.

In the previous week, Dycom Industries had 5 more articles in the media than Construction Partners. MarketBeat recorded 8 mentions for Dycom Industries and 3 mentions for Construction Partners. Construction Partners' average media sentiment score of 1.53 beat Dycom Industries' score of 0.99 indicating that Construction Partners is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Dycom Industries	6 Very Positive mention(s)	1 Positive mention(s)	1 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive
Construction Partners	2 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	0 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Very Positive

Dycom Industries has a net margin of 4.79% compared to Construction Partners' net margin of 4.10%. Dycom Industries' return on equity of 25.30% beat Construction Partners' return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Dycom Industries	4.79%	25.30%	8.39%
Construction Partners	4.10%	16.06%	4.59%

Dycom Industries has a beta of 1.49, meaning that its stock price is 49% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Construction Partners has a beta of 0.9, meaning that its stock price is 10% less volatile than the broader market.

98.3% of Dycom Industries shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 94.8% of Construction Partners shares are owned by institutional investors. 1.2% of Dycom Industries shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 15.7% of Construction Partners shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Dycom Industries has higher revenue and earnings than Construction Partners. Dycom Industries is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Construction Partners, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Dycom Industries	$5.55B	1.67	$281.19M	$10.99	28.03
Construction Partners	$2.81B	2.01	$101.78M	$2.55	39.09

Dycom Industries currently has a consensus target price of $502.42, indicating a potential upside of 63.12%. Construction Partners has a consensus target price of $133.50, indicating a potential upside of 33.94%. Given Dycom Industries' stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Dycom Industries is more favorable than Construction Partners.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Dycom Industries	0 Sell rating(s)	1 Hold rating(s)	11 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.92
Construction Partners	0 Sell rating(s)	3 Hold rating(s)	4 Buy rating(s)	1 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.75

Summary

Dycom Industries beats Construction Partners on 12 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Construction Partners News Delivered to You Automatically

Subscribe Now

SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding ROAD and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of NASDAQ and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.

ROAD vs. The Competition

Export

Metric	Construction Partners	Construction & Engineering Industry	Industrials Sector	NASDAQ Exchange
Market Cap	$5.66B	$8.10B	$10.30B	$12.84B
Dividend Yield	N/A	2.63%	97.17%	11.71%
P/E Ratio	39.09	21.58	25.79	25.35
Price / Sales	2.01	58.94	333.41	90.72
Price / Cash	20.34	17.38	23.85	34.96
Price / Book	6.11	4.52	4.86	6.21
Net Income	$101.78M	$487.40M	$613.10M	$358.54M
7 Day Performance	-4.79%	-1.95%	-1.53%	-2.35%
1 Month Performance	-18.00%	-6.44%	-4.22%	-3.37%
1 Year Performance	-20.39%	16.69%	6.24%	8.81%

Construction Partners Competitors List

Export

Company	MarketRank	Share Price	Analysts' Price Target	1Y Price Performance	Market Cap	Revenue	P/E Ratio	Employee Count	Indicator(s)
ROAD Construction Partners	4.6406 of 5 stars	$99.67 flat	$133.50 +33.9%	-20.4%	$5.66B	$2.81B	39.09	6,412
MTZ MasTec	4.5292 of 5 stars	$236.81 -0.2%	$427.32 +80.4%	+26.7%	$19.05B	$14.30B	37.77	36,000	Positive News
APG APi Group	3.8825 of 5 stars	$40.03 0.0%	$52.57 +31.3%	+8.9%	$17.30B	$7.91B	N/A	29,000
STRL Sterling Infrastructure	4.628 of 5 stars	$486.49 flat	$690.33 +41.9%	+63.0%	$14.88B	$2.49B	35.08	4,400	Gap Down
IESC IES	1.0454 of 5 stars	$322.57 flat	$114.50 -64.5%	+266.3%	$12.85B	$3.37B	28.66	10,283	Analyst Upgrade Short Interest Increase Gap Down

Related Companies and Tools

Related Companies

Top 10 Stock Comparisons

This page (NASDAQ:ROAD) was last updated on 9/14/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.

From Our Partners

Unlock superior investment research and tools.

Get MarketBeat All Access

In-depth profiles and analysis for 20,000 public companies.
Real-time analyst ratings, insider transactions, earnings data, and more.
Our daily ratings and market update email newsletter.

Sign In
Create Account

Your Email Address:

Your Password:

Forgot your password?

Your Email Address:

Choose a Password:

By creating a free account, you agree to our terms of service. This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

Construction Partners (ROAD) Competitors

ROAD vs. MTZ, APG, STRL, IESC, and DY

How does Construction Partners compare to MasTec?

Summary

How does Construction Partners compare to APi Group?

Summary

How does Construction Partners compare to Sterling Infrastructure?

Summary

How does Construction Partners compare to IES?

Summary

How does Construction Partners compare to Dycom Industries?

Summary

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

Media Sentiment Over Time

ROAD vs. The Competition

Construction Partners Competitors List

Related Companies and Tools

Best-in-Class Portfolio Monitoring

Stock Ideas and Recommendations

Advanced Stock Screeners and Research Tools

About MarketBeat

MarketBeat Products

Popular Tools

Financial Calendars

Terms & Info

Construction Partners (ROAD) Competitors

ROAD vs. MTZ, APG, STRL, IESC, and DY

How does Construction Partners compare to MasTec?

Do analysts rate ROAD or MTZ?

Do institutionals and insiders hold more shares of ROAD or MTZ?

Which has more risk & volatility, ROAD or MTZ?

Which has stronger valuation & earnings, ROAD or MTZ?

Is ROAD or MTZ more profitable?

Does the media favor ROAD or MTZ?

Summary

How does Construction Partners compare to APi Group?

Do insiders and institutionals hold more shares of ROAD or APG?

Which has more risk & volatility, ROAD or APG?

Do analysts prefer ROAD or APG?

Is ROAD or APG more profitable?

Does the media favor ROAD or APG?

Which has stronger valuation and earnings, ROAD or APG?

Summary

How does Construction Partners compare to Sterling Infrastructure?

Do insiders & institutionals have more ownership in STRL or ROAD?

Which has more risk and volatility, STRL or ROAD?

Which has preferable earnings & valuation, STRL or ROAD?

Do analysts prefer STRL or ROAD?

Is STRL or ROAD more profitable?

Does the media prefer STRL or ROAD?

Summary

How does Construction Partners compare to IES?

Do insiders and institutionals have more ownership in IESC or ROAD?

Which has stronger valuation and earnings, IESC or ROAD?

Is IESC or ROAD more profitable?

Does the media refer more to IESC or ROAD?

Do analysts recommend IESC or ROAD?

Which has more volatility & risk, IESC or ROAD?

Summary

How does Construction Partners compare to Dycom Industries?

Does the media refer more to DY or ROAD?

Is DY or ROAD more profitable?

Which has more risk and volatility, DY or ROAD?

Do insiders & institutionals have more ownership in DY or ROAD?

Which has better earnings & valuation, DY or ROAD?

Do analysts recommend DY or ROAD?

Summary

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

Media Sentiment Over Time

ROAD vs. The Competition

Construction Partners Competitors List

Related Companies and Tools

MarketBeat All Access Features

Best-in-Class Portfolio Monitoring

Stock Ideas and Recommendations

Advanced Stock Screeners and Research Tools