Does the media prefer ROAD or MTZ?

In the previous week, MasTec had 20 more articles in the media than Construction Partners. MarketBeat recorded 22 mentions for MasTec and 2 mentions for Construction Partners. MasTec's average media sentiment score of 1.50 beat Construction Partners' score of 1.16 indicating that MasTec is being referred to more favorably in the news media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment Construction Partners 1 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 1 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive MasTec 20 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 2 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive

Does the media refer more to APG or ROAD?

In the previous week, APi Group and APi Group both had 2 articles in the media. Construction Partners' average media sentiment score of 1.16 beat APi Group's score of 0.51 indicating that Construction Partners is being referred to more favorably in the news media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment APi Group 1 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 1 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive Construction Partners 1 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 1 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive

Does the media favor ROAD or STRL?

In the previous week, Sterling Infrastructure had 22 more articles in the media than Construction Partners. MarketBeat recorded 24 mentions for Sterling Infrastructure and 2 mentions for Construction Partners. Sterling Infrastructure's average media sentiment score of 1.37 beat Construction Partners' score of 1.16 indicating that Sterling Infrastructure is being referred to more favorably in the news media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment Construction Partners 1 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 1 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive Sterling Infrastructure 18 Very Positive mention(s) 3 Positive mention(s) 2 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive

Is IESC or ROAD more profitable?

IES has a net margin of 11.40% compared to Construction Partners' net margin of 4.10%. IES's return on equity of 35.70% beat Construction Partners' return on equity. Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets IES 11.40% 35.70% 19.68% Construction Partners 4.10% 16.06% 4.59%

Does the media favor IESC or ROAD?

In the previous week, Construction Partners had 1 more articles in the media than IES. MarketBeat recorded 2 mentions for Construction Partners and 1 mentions for IES. Construction Partners' average media sentiment score of 1.16 beat IES's score of 1.05 indicating that Construction Partners is being referred to more favorably in the news media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment IES 1 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 0 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive Construction Partners 1 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 1 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive

Does the media refer more to ROAD or DY?

In the previous week, Dycom Industries had 18 more articles in the media than Construction Partners. MarketBeat recorded 20 mentions for Dycom Industries and 2 mentions for Construction Partners. Dycom Industries' average media sentiment score of 1.40 beat Construction Partners' score of 1.16 indicating that Dycom Industries is being referred to more favorably in the news media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment Construction Partners 1 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 1 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive Dycom Industries 17 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 2 Neutral mention(s) 1 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive

Construction Partners (ROAD) Competitors

$108.49 -3.68 (-3.28%)

Closing price 04:00 PM Eastern

Extended Trading

$108.54 +0.05 (+0.05%)

As of 05:21 PM Eastern

Compare

ROAD vs. MTZ, APG, STRL, IESC, and DY

Should you buy Construction Partners stock or one of its competitors? Construction Partners's main competitors and comparable companies include MasTec (MTZ), APi Group (APG), Sterling Infrastructure (STRL), IES (IESC), and Dycom Industries (DY). Companies are selected based on similarities in market, industry, and size. These companies are all part of the "construction & engineering" industry.

How does Construction Partners compare to MasTec?

Construction Partners (NASDAQ:ROAD) and MasTec (NYSE:MTZ) are both industrials companies, but which is the better stock? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, valuation, institutional ownership, dividends, earnings, profitability, media sentiment and risk.

MasTec has higher revenue and earnings than Construction Partners. MasTec is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Construction Partners, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Construction Partners	$3.48B	1.77	$101.78M	$2.55	42.55
MasTec	$14.30B	1.43	$399.04M	$6.27	40.70

Construction Partners has a net margin of 4.10% compared to MasTec's net margin of 3.07%. MasTec's return on equity of 18.08% beat Construction Partners' return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Construction Partners	4.10%	16.06%	4.59%
MasTec	3.07%	18.08%	5.97%

Construction Partners has a beta of 0.89, meaning that its share price is 11% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, MasTec has a beta of 1.82, meaning that its share price is 82% more volatile than the broader market.

94.8% of Construction Partners shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 78.1% of MasTec shares are held by institutional investors. 15.7% of Construction Partners shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 21.4% of MasTec shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Construction Partners currently has a consensus target price of $133.50, suggesting a potential upside of 23.05%. MasTec has a consensus target price of $427.32, suggesting a potential upside of 67.44%. Given MasTec's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe MasTec is more favorable than Construction Partners.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Construction Partners	0 Sell rating(s)	3 Hold rating(s)	4 Buy rating(s)	1 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.75
MasTec	0 Sell rating(s)	1 Hold rating(s)	19 Buy rating(s)	1 Strong Buy rating(s)	3.00

In the previous week, MasTec had 20 more articles in the media than Construction Partners. MarketBeat recorded 22 mentions for MasTec and 2 mentions for Construction Partners. MasTec's average media sentiment score of 1.50 beat Construction Partners' score of 1.16 indicating that MasTec is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Construction Partners	1 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	1 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive
MasTec	20 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	2 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive

Summary

MasTec beats Construction Partners on 12 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Construction Partners compare to APi Group?

APi Group (NYSE:APG) and Construction Partners (NASDAQ:ROAD) are both industrials companies, but which is the better investment? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their risk, profitability, media sentiment, valuation, dividends, earnings, institutional ownership and analyst recommendations.

86.6% of APi Group shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 94.8% of Construction Partners shares are owned by institutional investors. 18.7% of APi Group shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 15.7% of Construction Partners shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

APi Group has a beta of 1.6, indicating that its stock price is 60% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Construction Partners has a beta of 0.89, indicating that its stock price is 11% less volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, APi Group and APi Group both had 2 articles in the media. Construction Partners' average media sentiment score of 1.16 beat APi Group's score of 0.51 indicating that Construction Partners is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
APi Group	1 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	1 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive
Construction Partners	1 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	1 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive

APi Group has higher revenue and earnings than Construction Partners. APi Group is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Construction Partners, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
APi Group	$8.44B	2.09	$302M	-$0.67	N/A
Construction Partners	$3.48B	1.77	$101.78M	$2.55	42.55

Construction Partners has a net margin of 4.10% compared to APi Group's net margin of 3.99%. APi Group's return on equity of 37.59% beat Construction Partners' return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
APi Group	3.99%	37.59%	14.07%
Construction Partners	4.10%	16.06%	4.59%

APi Group presently has a consensus target price of $52.57, indicating a potential upside of 29.09%. Construction Partners has a consensus target price of $133.50, indicating a potential upside of 23.05%. Given APi Group's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe APi Group is more favorable than Construction Partners.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
APi Group	0 Sell rating(s)	2 Hold rating(s)	6 Buy rating(s)	1 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.89
Construction Partners	0 Sell rating(s)	3 Hold rating(s)	4 Buy rating(s)	1 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.75

Summary

APi Group beats Construction Partners on 10 of the 15 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Construction Partners compare to Sterling Infrastructure?

Construction Partners (NASDAQ:ROAD) and Sterling Infrastructure (NASDAQ:STRL) are both industrials companies, but which is the superior stock? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their media sentiment, valuation, analyst recommendations, earnings, risk, institutional ownership, profitability and dividends.

Sterling Infrastructure has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Construction Partners. Sterling Infrastructure is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Construction Partners, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Construction Partners	$3.48B	1.77	$101.78M	$2.55	42.55
Sterling Infrastructure	$2.49B	6.10	$290.15M	$13.87	35.81

Construction Partners has a beta of 0.89, meaning that its share price is 11% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Sterling Infrastructure has a beta of 1.88, meaning that its share price is 88% more volatile than the broader market.

94.8% of Construction Partners shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 81.0% of Sterling Infrastructure shares are held by institutional investors. 15.7% of Construction Partners shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 1.6% of Sterling Infrastructure shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

In the previous week, Sterling Infrastructure had 22 more articles in the media than Construction Partners. MarketBeat recorded 24 mentions for Sterling Infrastructure and 2 mentions for Construction Partners. Sterling Infrastructure's average media sentiment score of 1.37 beat Construction Partners' score of 1.16 indicating that Sterling Infrastructure is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Construction Partners	1 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	1 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive
Sterling Infrastructure	18 Very Positive mention(s)	3 Positive mention(s)	2 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive

Construction Partners currently has a consensus target price of $133.50, indicating a potential upside of 23.05%. Sterling Infrastructure has a consensus target price of $690.33, indicating a potential upside of 39.00%. Given Sterling Infrastructure's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Sterling Infrastructure is more favorable than Construction Partners.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Construction Partners	0 Sell rating(s)	3 Hold rating(s)	4 Buy rating(s)	1 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.75
Sterling Infrastructure	0 Sell rating(s)	1 Hold rating(s)	7 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.88

Sterling Infrastructure has a net margin of 12.55% compared to Construction Partners' net margin of 4.10%. Sterling Infrastructure's return on equity of 40.12% beat Construction Partners' return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Construction Partners	4.10%	16.06%	4.59%
Sterling Infrastructure	12.55%	40.12%	17.15%

Summary

Sterling Infrastructure beats Construction Partners on 12 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Construction Partners compare to IES?

IES (NASDAQ:IESC) and Construction Partners (NASDAQ:ROAD) are both mid-cap industrials companies, but which is the better investment? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their valuation, profitability, institutional ownership, risk, earnings, dividends, media sentiment and analyst recommendations.

86.6% of IES shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 94.8% of Construction Partners shares are owned by institutional investors. 56.4% of IES shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 15.7% of Construction Partners shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

IES currently has a consensus target price of $114.50, suggesting a potential downside of 64.67%. Construction Partners has a consensus target price of $133.50, suggesting a potential upside of 23.05%. Given Construction Partners' stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Construction Partners is more favorable than IES.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
IES	0 Sell rating(s)	1 Hold rating(s)	1 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.50
Construction Partners	0 Sell rating(s)	3 Hold rating(s)	4 Buy rating(s)	1 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.75

IES has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Construction Partners. IES is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Construction Partners, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
IES	$3.37B	1.92	$303.06M	$22.51	14.40
Construction Partners	$3.48B	1.77	$101.78M	$2.55	42.55

In the previous week, Construction Partners had 1 more articles in the media than IES. MarketBeat recorded 2 mentions for Construction Partners and 1 mentions for IES. Construction Partners' average media sentiment score of 1.16 beat IES's score of 1.05 indicating that Construction Partners is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
IES	1 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	0 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive
Construction Partners	1 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	1 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive

IES has a net margin of 11.40% compared to Construction Partners' net margin of 4.10%. IES's return on equity of 35.70% beat Construction Partners' return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
IES	11.40%	35.70%	19.68%
Construction Partners	4.10%	16.06%	4.59%

IES has a beta of 1.78, meaning that its stock price is 78% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Construction Partners has a beta of 0.89, meaning that its stock price is 11% less volatile than the broader market.

Summary

Construction Partners beats IES on 9 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Construction Partners compare to Dycom Industries?

Construction Partners (NASDAQ:ROAD) and Dycom Industries (NYSE:DY) are both industrials companies, but which is the better business? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their earnings, profitability, risk, valuation, media sentiment, analyst recommendations, institutional ownership and dividends.

Dycom Industries has higher revenue and earnings than Construction Partners. Dycom Industries is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Construction Partners, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Construction Partners	$3.48B	1.77	$101.78M	$2.55	42.55
Dycom Industries	$5.55B	2.07	$281.19M	$10.51	36.32

In the previous week, Dycom Industries had 18 more articles in the media than Construction Partners. MarketBeat recorded 20 mentions for Dycom Industries and 2 mentions for Construction Partners. Dycom Industries' average media sentiment score of 1.40 beat Construction Partners' score of 1.16 indicating that Dycom Industries is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Construction Partners	1 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	1 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive
Dycom Industries	17 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	2 Neutral mention(s)	1 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive

94.8% of Construction Partners shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 98.3% of Dycom Industries shares are owned by institutional investors. 15.7% of Construction Partners shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 1.2% of Dycom Industries shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Dycom Industries has a net margin of 4.98% compared to Construction Partners' net margin of 4.10%. Dycom Industries' return on equity of 24.13% beat Construction Partners' return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Construction Partners	4.10%	16.06%	4.59%
Dycom Industries	4.98%	24.13%	8.53%

Construction Partners currently has a consensus target price of $133.50, indicating a potential upside of 23.05%. Dycom Industries has a consensus target price of $578.09, indicating a potential upside of 51.43%. Given Dycom Industries' stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Dycom Industries is more favorable than Construction Partners.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Construction Partners	0 Sell rating(s)	3 Hold rating(s)	4 Buy rating(s)	1 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.75
Dycom Industries	0 Sell rating(s)	1 Hold rating(s)	11 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.92

Construction Partners has a beta of 0.89, meaning that its share price is 11% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Dycom Industries has a beta of 1.54, meaning that its share price is 54% more volatile than the broader market.

Summary

Dycom Industries beats Construction Partners on 14 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Construction Partners News Delivered to You Automatically

Subscribe Now

SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding ROAD and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of NASDAQ and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.

ROAD vs. The Competition

Export

Metric	Construction Partners	Construction & Engineering Industry	Industrials Sector	NASDAQ Exchange
Market Cap	$6.16B	$8.16B	$10.63B	$12.71B
Dividend Yield	N/A	2.66%	97.24%	10.79%
P/E Ratio	42.55	22.16	26.47	24.10
Price / Sales	1.77	60.13	307.62	77.05
Price / Cash	22.89	17.78	24.31	36.90
Price / Book	6.66	4.64	4.83	6.40
Net Income	$101.78M	$482.40M	$612.94M	$348.28M
7 Day Performance	-9.94%	-3.74%	-1.76%	0.92%
1 Month Performance	5.03%	-3.05%	2.24%	5.10%
1 Year Performance	-10.04%	42.09%	11.41%	16.16%

Construction Partners Competitors List

Export

Company	MarketRank	Share Price	Analysts' Price Target	1Y Price Performance	Market Cap	Revenue	P/E Ratio	Employee Count	Indicator(s)
ROAD Construction Partners	3.9417 of 5 stars	$108.49 -3.3%	$133.50 +23.1%	-7.0%	$6.16B	$3.48B	42.55	6,412	Positive News
MTZ MasTec	4.5276 of 5 stars	$302.51 +1.7%	$427.32 +41.3%	+51.0%	$23.90B	$14.30B	48.25	36,000	Positive News
APG APi Group	3.9549 of 5 stars	$44.68 +1.7%	$52.57 +17.7%	+15.5%	$18.99B	$8.44B	N/A	29,000
STRL Sterling Infrastructure	4.8765 of 5 stars	$603.89 +4.8%	$657.00 +8.8%	+84.9%	$17.63B	$2.49B	43.54	4,400	Positive News Analyst Forecast
IESC IES	1.7012 of 5 stars	$793.96 +5.0%	$229.00 -71.2%	+703.3%	$15.07B	$3.37B	35.27	10,283	Positive News

Related Companies and Tools

Related Companies

Top 10 Stock Comparisons

This page (NASDAQ:ROAD) was last updated on 8/24/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.

From Our Partners

Unlock superior investment research and tools.

Get MarketBeat All Access

In-depth profiles and analysis for 20,000 public companies.
Real-time analyst ratings, insider transactions, earnings data, and more.
Our daily ratings and market update email newsletter.

Sign In
Create Account

Your Email Address:

Your Password:

Forgot your password?

Your Email Address:

Choose a Password:

By creating a free account, you agree to our terms of service. This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

Construction Partners (ROAD) Competitors

ROAD vs. MTZ, APG, STRL, IESC, and DY

How does Construction Partners compare to MasTec?

Summary

How does Construction Partners compare to APi Group?

Summary

How does Construction Partners compare to Sterling Infrastructure?

Summary

How does Construction Partners compare to IES?

Summary

How does Construction Partners compare to Dycom Industries?

Summary

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

Media Sentiment Over Time

ROAD vs. The Competition

Construction Partners Competitors List

Related Companies and Tools

Best-in-Class Portfolio Monitoring

Stock Ideas and Recommendations

Advanced Stock Screeners and Research Tools

About MarketBeat

MarketBeat Products

Popular Tools

Financial Calendars

Terms & Info

Construction Partners (ROAD) Competitors

ROAD vs. MTZ, APG, STRL, IESC, and DY

How does Construction Partners compare to MasTec?

Which has better earnings and valuation, ROAD or MTZ?

Is ROAD or MTZ more profitable?

Which has more volatility and risk, ROAD or MTZ?

Do institutionals and insiders hold more shares of ROAD or MTZ?

Do analysts recommend ROAD or MTZ?

Does the media prefer ROAD or MTZ?

Summary

How does Construction Partners compare to APi Group?

Do insiders & institutionals have more ownership in APG or ROAD?

Which has more risk and volatility, APG or ROAD?

Does the media refer more to APG or ROAD?

Which has higher earnings & valuation, APG or ROAD?

Is APG or ROAD more profitable?

Do analysts recommend APG or ROAD?

Summary

How does Construction Partners compare to Sterling Infrastructure?

Which has better earnings & valuation, ROAD or STRL?

Which has more volatility and risk, ROAD or STRL?

Do insiders and institutionals have more ownership in ROAD or STRL?

Does the media favor ROAD or STRL?

Do analysts recommend ROAD or STRL?

Is ROAD or STRL more profitable?

Summary

How does Construction Partners compare to IES?

Do institutionals & insiders hold more shares of IESC or ROAD?

Do analysts recommend IESC or ROAD?

Which has higher valuation and earnings, IESC or ROAD?

Does the media favor IESC or ROAD?

Is IESC or ROAD more profitable?

Which has more risk & volatility, IESC or ROAD?

Summary

How does Construction Partners compare to Dycom Industries?

Which has preferable valuation and earnings, ROAD or DY?

Does the media refer more to ROAD or DY?

Do insiders & institutionals have more ownership in ROAD or DY?

Is ROAD or DY more profitable?

Do analysts rate ROAD or DY?

Which has more volatility and risk, ROAD or DY?

Summary

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

Media Sentiment Over Time

ROAD vs. The Competition

Construction Partners Competitors List

Related Companies and Tools

MarketBeat All Access Features

Best-in-Class Portfolio Monitoring

Stock Ideas and Recommendations

Advanced Stock Screeners and Research Tools