Does the media favor MTZ or ROAD?

In the previous week, MasTec had 1 more articles in the media than Construction Partners. MarketBeat recorded 5 mentions for MasTec and 4 mentions for Construction Partners. MasTec's average media sentiment score of 0.65 beat Construction Partners' score of 0.23 indicating that MasTec is being referred to more favorably in the media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment MasTec 0 Very Positive mention(s) 3 Positive mention(s) 1 Neutral mention(s) 1 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive Construction Partners 0 Very Positive mention(s) 1 Positive mention(s) 1 Neutral mention(s) 2 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Neutral

Does the media favor ROAD or APG?

In the previous week, Construction Partners had 3 more articles in the media than APi Group. MarketBeat recorded 4 mentions for Construction Partners and 1 mentions for APi Group. APi Group's average media sentiment score of 1.11 beat Construction Partners' score of 0.23 indicating that APi Group is being referred to more favorably in the news media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment Construction Partners 0 Very Positive mention(s) 1 Positive mention(s) 1 Neutral mention(s) 2 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Neutral APi Group 1 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 0 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive

Does the media refer more to STRL or ROAD?

In the previous week, Sterling Infrastructure had 3 more articles in the media than Construction Partners. MarketBeat recorded 7 mentions for Sterling Infrastructure and 4 mentions for Construction Partners. Sterling Infrastructure's average media sentiment score of 0.51 beat Construction Partners' score of 0.23 indicating that Sterling Infrastructure is being referred to more favorably in the media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment Sterling Infrastructure 1 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 3 Neutral mention(s) 2 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive Construction Partners 0 Very Positive mention(s) 1 Positive mention(s) 1 Neutral mention(s) 2 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Neutral

Does the media favor ROAD or IESC?

In the previous week, Construction Partners had 2 more articles in the media than IES. MarketBeat recorded 4 mentions for Construction Partners and 2 mentions for IES. IES's average media sentiment score of 0.72 beat Construction Partners' score of 0.23 indicating that IES is being referred to more favorably in the news media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment Construction Partners 0 Very Positive mention(s) 1 Positive mention(s) 1 Neutral mention(s) 2 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Neutral IES 0 Very Positive mention(s) 2 Positive mention(s) 0 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive

Does the media refer more to DY or ROAD?

In the previous week, Dycom Industries and Dycom Industries both had 4 articles in the media. Construction Partners' average media sentiment score of 0.23 beat Dycom Industries' score of 0.12 indicating that Construction Partners is being referred to more favorably in the news media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment Dycom Industries 0 Very Positive mention(s) 1 Positive mention(s) 0 Neutral mention(s) 3 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Neutral Construction Partners 0 Very Positive mention(s) 1 Positive mention(s) 1 Neutral mention(s) 2 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Neutral

Construction Partners (ROAD) Competitors

$91.08 +0.93 (+1.03%)

Closing price 10/2/2026 04:00 PM Eastern

Extended Trading

$91.52 +0.45 (+0.49%)

As of 10/2/2026 07:30 PM Eastern

Compare

ROAD vs. MTZ, APG, STRL, IESC, and DY

Should you buy Construction Partners stock or one of its competitors? Construction Partners's main competitors and comparable companies include MasTec (MTZ), APi Group (APG), Sterling Infrastructure (STRL), IES (IESC), and Dycom Industries (DY). Companies are selected based on similarities in market, industry, and size. These companies are all part of the "construction & engineering" industry.

How does Construction Partners compare to MasTec?

MasTec (NYSE:MTZ) and Construction Partners (NASDAQ:ROAD) are both industrials companies, but which is the superior business? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their dividends, media sentiment, risk, valuation, institutional ownership, earnings, analyst recommendations and profitability.

MasTec has higher revenue and earnings than Construction Partners. MasTec is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Construction Partners, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
MasTec	$14.30B	1.21	$399.04M	$6.27	34.41
Construction Partners	$2.81B	1.84	$101.78M	$2.55	35.72

MasTec has a beta of 1.84, suggesting that its stock price is 84% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Construction Partners has a beta of 0.93, suggesting that its stock price is 7% less volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, MasTec had 1 more articles in the media than Construction Partners. MarketBeat recorded 5 mentions for MasTec and 4 mentions for Construction Partners. MasTec's average media sentiment score of 0.65 beat Construction Partners' score of 0.23 indicating that MasTec is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
MasTec	0 Very Positive mention(s)	3 Positive mention(s)	1 Neutral mention(s)	1 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive
Construction Partners	0 Very Positive mention(s)	1 Positive mention(s)	1 Neutral mention(s)	2 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Neutral

MasTec presently has a consensus price target of $421.60, suggesting a potential upside of 95.41%. Construction Partners has a consensus price target of $133.50, suggesting a potential upside of 46.57%. Given MasTec's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, equities research analysts clearly believe MasTec is more favorable than Construction Partners.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
MasTec	0 Sell rating(s)	3 Hold rating(s)	19 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.86
Construction Partners	0 Sell rating(s)	4 Hold rating(s)	3 Buy rating(s)	1 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.63

Construction Partners has a net margin of 4.10% compared to MasTec's net margin of 3.07%. MasTec's return on equity of 18.08% beat Construction Partners' return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
MasTec	3.07%	18.08%	5.97%
Construction Partners	4.10%	16.06%	4.59%

78.1% of MasTec shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 94.8% of Construction Partners shares are held by institutional investors. 21.4% of MasTec shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 15.7% of Construction Partners shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Summary

MasTec beats Construction Partners on 12 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Construction Partners compare to APi Group?

Construction Partners (NASDAQ:ROAD) and APi Group (NYSE:APG) are both industrials companies, but which is the superior business? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their earnings, dividends, risk, institutional ownership, profitability, analyst recommendations, valuation and media sentiment.

In the previous week, Construction Partners had 3 more articles in the media than APi Group. MarketBeat recorded 4 mentions for Construction Partners and 1 mentions for APi Group. APi Group's average media sentiment score of 1.11 beat Construction Partners' score of 0.23 indicating that APi Group is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Construction Partners	0 Very Positive mention(s)	1 Positive mention(s)	1 Neutral mention(s)	2 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Neutral
APi Group	1 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	0 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive

Construction Partners presently has a consensus target price of $133.50, indicating a potential upside of 46.57%. APi Group has a consensus target price of $52.57, indicating a potential upside of 29.58%. Given Construction Partners' higher probable upside, equities analysts plainly believe Construction Partners is more favorable than APi Group.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Construction Partners	0 Sell rating(s)	4 Hold rating(s)	3 Buy rating(s)	1 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.63
APi Group	0 Sell rating(s)	1 Hold rating(s)	6 Buy rating(s)	1 Strong Buy rating(s)	3.00

APi Group has higher revenue and earnings than Construction Partners. APi Group is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Construction Partners, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Construction Partners	$2.81B	1.84	$101.78M	$2.55	35.72
APi Group	$7.91B	2.22	$302M	-$0.67	N/A

Construction Partners has a beta of 0.93, indicating that its stock price is 7% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, APi Group has a beta of 1.57, indicating that its stock price is 57% more volatile than the broader market.

94.8% of Construction Partners shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 86.6% of APi Group shares are owned by institutional investors. 15.7% of Construction Partners shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 18.7% of APi Group shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Construction Partners has a net margin of 4.10% compared to APi Group's net margin of 3.99%. APi Group's return on equity of 37.59% beat Construction Partners' return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Construction Partners	4.10%	16.06%	4.59%
APi Group	3.99%	37.59%	14.07%

Summary

APi Group beats Construction Partners on 10 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Construction Partners compare to Sterling Infrastructure?

Sterling Infrastructure (NASDAQ:STRL) and Construction Partners (NASDAQ:ROAD) are both industrials companies, but which is the superior investment? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their risk, analyst recommendations, earnings, dividends, media sentiment, valuation, profitability and institutional ownership.

Sterling Infrastructure has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Construction Partners. Construction Partners is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Sterling Infrastructure, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Sterling Infrastructure	$2.49B	6.55	$290.15M	$13.87	38.46
Construction Partners	$2.81B	1.84	$101.78M	$2.55	35.72

81.0% of Sterling Infrastructure shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 94.8% of Construction Partners shares are held by institutional investors. 1.6% of Sterling Infrastructure shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 15.7% of Construction Partners shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Sterling Infrastructure has a net margin of 12.55% compared to Construction Partners' net margin of 4.10%. Sterling Infrastructure's return on equity of 40.12% beat Construction Partners' return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Sterling Infrastructure	12.55%	40.12%	17.15%
Construction Partners	4.10%	16.06%	4.59%

Sterling Infrastructure currently has a consensus target price of $690.33, suggesting a potential upside of 29.42%. Construction Partners has a consensus target price of $133.50, suggesting a potential upside of 46.57%. Given Construction Partners' higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Construction Partners is more favorable than Sterling Infrastructure.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Sterling Infrastructure	0 Sell rating(s)	2 Hold rating(s)	6 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.75
Construction Partners	0 Sell rating(s)	4 Hold rating(s)	3 Buy rating(s)	1 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.63

Sterling Infrastructure has a beta of 1.86, suggesting that its stock price is 86% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Construction Partners has a beta of 0.93, suggesting that its stock price is 7% less volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, Sterling Infrastructure had 3 more articles in the media than Construction Partners. MarketBeat recorded 7 mentions for Sterling Infrastructure and 4 mentions for Construction Partners. Sterling Infrastructure's average media sentiment score of 0.51 beat Construction Partners' score of 0.23 indicating that Sterling Infrastructure is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Sterling Infrastructure	1 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	3 Neutral mention(s)	2 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive
Construction Partners	0 Very Positive mention(s)	1 Positive mention(s)	1 Neutral mention(s)	2 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Neutral

Summary

Sterling Infrastructure beats Construction Partners on 12 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Construction Partners compare to IES?

Construction Partners (NASDAQ:ROAD) and IES (NASDAQ:IESC) are both industrials companies, but which is the superior business? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their institutional ownership, valuation, earnings, profitability, analyst recommendations, dividends, media sentiment and risk.

94.8% of Construction Partners shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 86.6% of IES shares are owned by institutional investors. 15.7% of Construction Partners shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 56.4% of IES shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

In the previous week, Construction Partners had 2 more articles in the media than IES. MarketBeat recorded 4 mentions for Construction Partners and 2 mentions for IES. IES's average media sentiment score of 0.72 beat Construction Partners' score of 0.23 indicating that IES is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Construction Partners	0 Very Positive mention(s)	1 Positive mention(s)	1 Neutral mention(s)	2 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Neutral
IES	0 Very Positive mention(s)	2 Positive mention(s)	0 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive

Construction Partners presently has a consensus target price of $133.50, suggesting a potential upside of 46.57%. IES has a consensus target price of $334.50, suggesting a potential downside of 1.43%. Given Construction Partners' higher possible upside, research analysts clearly believe Construction Partners is more favorable than IES.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Construction Partners	0 Sell rating(s)	4 Hold rating(s)	3 Buy rating(s)	1 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.63
IES	0 Sell rating(s)	1 Hold rating(s)	2 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.67

IES has higher revenue and earnings than Construction Partners. IES is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Construction Partners, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Construction Partners	$2.81B	1.84	$101.78M	$2.55	35.72
IES	$3.37B	4.01	$303.06M	$11.26	30.14

IES has a net margin of 11.40% compared to Construction Partners' net margin of 4.10%. IES's return on equity of 35.70% beat Construction Partners' return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Construction Partners	4.10%	16.06%	4.59%
IES	11.40%	35.70%	19.68%

Construction Partners has a beta of 0.93, meaning that its share price is 7% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, IES has a beta of 1.77, meaning that its share price is 77% more volatile than the broader market.

Summary

IES beats Construction Partners on 11 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Construction Partners compare to Dycom Industries?

Dycom Industries (NYSE:DY) and Construction Partners (NASDAQ:ROAD) are both mid-cap industrials companies, but which is the better investment? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their risk, profitability, media sentiment, valuation, dividends, earnings, institutional ownership and analyst recommendations.

Dycom Industries has higher revenue and earnings than Construction Partners. Dycom Industries is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Construction Partners, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Dycom Industries	$5.55B	1.49	$281.19M	$10.99	24.91
Construction Partners	$2.81B	1.84	$101.78M	$2.55	35.72

Dycom Industries has a beta of 1.5, indicating that its stock price is 50% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Construction Partners has a beta of 0.93, indicating that its stock price is 7% less volatile than the broader market.

98.3% of Dycom Industries shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 94.8% of Construction Partners shares are owned by institutional investors. 1.2% of Dycom Industries shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 15.7% of Construction Partners shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Dycom Industries has a net margin of 4.79% compared to Construction Partners' net margin of 4.10%. Dycom Industries' return on equity of 25.30% beat Construction Partners' return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Dycom Industries	4.79%	25.30%	8.39%
Construction Partners	4.10%	16.06%	4.59%

Dycom Industries presently has a consensus target price of $502.92, indicating a potential upside of 83.67%. Construction Partners has a consensus target price of $133.50, indicating a potential upside of 46.57%. Given Dycom Industries' stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Dycom Industries is more favorable than Construction Partners.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Dycom Industries	0 Sell rating(s)	2 Hold rating(s)	10 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.83
Construction Partners	0 Sell rating(s)	4 Hold rating(s)	3 Buy rating(s)	1 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.63

In the previous week, Dycom Industries and Dycom Industries both had 4 articles in the media. Construction Partners' average media sentiment score of 0.23 beat Dycom Industries' score of 0.12 indicating that Construction Partners is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Dycom Industries	0 Very Positive mention(s)	1 Positive mention(s)	0 Neutral mention(s)	3 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Neutral
Construction Partners	0 Very Positive mention(s)	1 Positive mention(s)	1 Neutral mention(s)	2 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Neutral

Summary

Dycom Industries beats Construction Partners on 11 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Construction Partners News Delivered to You Automatically

Subscribe Now

SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding ROAD and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of NASDAQ and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.

ROAD vs. The Competition

Export

Metric	Construction Partners	Construction & Engineering Industry	Industrials Sector	NASDAQ Exchange
Market Cap	$5.17B	$7.93B	$10.19B	$13.28B
Dividend Yield	N/A	2.65%	96.74%	17.33%
P/E Ratio	35.72	21.78	25.66	26.04
Price / Sales	1.84	58.83	269.58	105.11
Price / Cash	18.59	16.99	24.07	52.62
Price / Book	5.59	5.12	4.80	6.31
Net Income	$101.78M	$487.38M	$616.13M	$362.16M
7 Day Performance	-2.81%	-0.96%	-0.58%	-1.66%
1 Month Performance	-12.99%	-2.61%	-2.51%	-4.68%
1 Year Performance	-27.51%	12.54%	2.72%	1.57%

Construction Partners Competitors List

Export

Company	MarketRank	Share Price	Analysts' Price Target	1Y Price Performance	Market Cap	Revenue	P/E Ratio	Employee Count	Indicator(s)
ROAD Construction Partners	4.4853 of 5 stars	$91.08 +1.0%	$133.50 +46.6%	-27.5%	$5.17B	$2.81B	35.72	6,412	News Coverage Gap Up
MTZ MasTec	4.1509 of 5 stars	$203.96 -4.2%	$421.60 +106.7%	-0.1%	$17.09B	$14.30B	32.53	36,000
APG APi Group	4.1682 of 5 stars	$38.31 -0.4%	$52.57 +37.2%	+17.2%	$16.62B	$7.91B	N/A	29,000
STRL Sterling Infrastructure	4.4347 of 5 stars	$498.36 -2.7%	$690.33 +38.5%	+52.7%	$15.67B	$2.49B	35.93	4,400	Analyst Forecast Gap Up
IESC IES	1.3092 of 5 stars	$322.09 -0.6%	$334.50 +3.9%	+77.2%	$12.92B	$3.37B	28.62	10,283

Related Companies and Tools

Related Companies

Top 10 Stock Comparisons

This page (NASDAQ:ROAD) was last updated on 10/4/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.

From Our Partners

Unlock superior investment research and tools.

Get MarketBeat All Access

In-depth profiles and analysis for 20,000 public companies.
Real-time analyst ratings, insider transactions, earnings data, and more.
Our daily ratings and market update email newsletter.

Sign In
Create Account

Your Email Address:

Your Password:

Forgot your password?

Your Email Address:

Choose a Password:

By creating a free account, you agree to our terms of service. This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

Construction Partners (ROAD) Competitors

ROAD vs. MTZ, APG, STRL, IESC, and DY

How does Construction Partners compare to MasTec?

Summary

How does Construction Partners compare to APi Group?

Summary

How does Construction Partners compare to Sterling Infrastructure?

Summary

How does Construction Partners compare to IES?

Summary

How does Construction Partners compare to Dycom Industries?

Summary

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

Media Sentiment Over Time

ROAD vs. The Competition

Construction Partners Competitors List

Related Companies and Tools

Best-in-Class Portfolio Monitoring

Stock Ideas and Recommendations

Advanced Stock Screeners and Research Tools

About MarketBeat

MarketBeat Products

Popular Tools

Financial Calendars

Terms & Info

Construction Partners (ROAD) Competitors

ROAD vs. MTZ, APG, STRL, IESC, and DY

How does Construction Partners compare to MasTec?

Which has preferable valuation & earnings, MTZ or ROAD?

Which has more volatility & risk, MTZ or ROAD?

Does the media favor MTZ or ROAD?

Do analysts prefer MTZ or ROAD?

Is MTZ or ROAD more profitable?

Do institutionals and insiders hold more shares of MTZ or ROAD?

Summary

How does Construction Partners compare to APi Group?

Does the media favor ROAD or APG?

Do analysts recommend ROAD or APG?

Which has stronger earnings and valuation, ROAD or APG?

Which has more risk & volatility, ROAD or APG?

Do insiders and institutionals believe in ROAD or APG?

Is ROAD or APG more profitable?

Summary

How does Construction Partners compare to Sterling Infrastructure?

Which has better earnings & valuation, STRL or ROAD?

Do institutionals and insiders have more ownership in STRL or ROAD?

Is STRL or ROAD more profitable?

Do analysts rate STRL or ROAD?

Which has more risk and volatility, STRL or ROAD?

Does the media refer more to STRL or ROAD?

Summary

How does Construction Partners compare to IES?

Do institutionals & insiders hold more shares of ROAD or IESC?

Does the media favor ROAD or IESC?

Do analysts recommend ROAD or IESC?

Which has preferable earnings and valuation, ROAD or IESC?

Is ROAD or IESC more profitable?

Which has more risk & volatility, ROAD or IESC?

Summary

How does Construction Partners compare to Dycom Industries?

Which has higher earnings & valuation, DY or ROAD?

Which has more risk and volatility, DY or ROAD?

Do insiders & institutionals have more ownership in DY or ROAD?

Is DY or ROAD more profitable?

Do analysts recommend DY or ROAD?

Does the media refer more to DY or ROAD?

Summary

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

Media Sentiment Over Time

ROAD vs. The Competition

Construction Partners Competitors List

Related Companies and Tools

MarketBeat All Access Features

Best-in-Class Portfolio Monitoring

Stock Ideas and Recommendations

Advanced Stock Screeners and Research Tools