Free Trial

Great Lakes Dredge & Dock (GLDD) Competitors

Great Lakes Dredge & Dock logo
$8.87 +0.27 (+3.14%)
As of 06/9/2026

GLDD vs. AMRC, NWPX, ORN, MTRX, and PWR

Should you buy Great Lakes Dredge & Dock stock or one of its competitors? MarketBeat compares Great Lakes Dredge & Dock with other companies and stocks that may be similar based on industry, sector, market capitalization, business model, investor interest, or shared news coverage. Companies and stocks commonly compared with Great Lakes Dredge & Dock include Ameresco (AMRC), NWPX Infrastructure (NWPX), Orion Group (ORN), Matrix Service (MTRX), and Quanta Services (PWR). These companies are all part of the "construction & engineering" industry.

How does Great Lakes Dredge & Dock compare to Ameresco?

Ameresco (NYSE:AMRC) and Great Lakes Dredge & Dock (NASDAQ:GLDD) are both small-cap construction & engineering companies, but which is the better stock? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, earnings, dividends, valuation, risk, media sentiment, profitability and institutional ownership.

Ameresco has a beta of 2.58, meaning that its share price is 158% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Great Lakes Dredge & Dock has a beta of 1.38, meaning that its share price is 38% more volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, Ameresco had 3 more articles in the media than Great Lakes Dredge & Dock. MarketBeat recorded 3 mentions for Ameresco and 0 mentions for Great Lakes Dredge & Dock. Ameresco's average media sentiment score of 1.43 beat Great Lakes Dredge & Dock's score of 0.00 indicating that Ameresco is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Ameresco Positive
Great Lakes Dredge & Dock Neutral

Ameresco presently has a consensus target price of $42.56, indicating a potential upside of 52.69%. Great Lakes Dredge & Dock has a consensus target price of $17.00, indicating a potential upside of 91.66%. Given Great Lakes Dredge & Dock's higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Great Lakes Dredge & Dock is more favorable than Ameresco.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Ameresco
1 Sell rating(s)
5 Hold rating(s)
7 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.46
Great Lakes Dredge & Dock
1 Sell rating(s)
4 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.00

99.2% of Ameresco shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 89.1% of Great Lakes Dredge & Dock shares are owned by institutional investors. 45.1% of Ameresco shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 2.2% of Great Lakes Dredge & Dock shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Great Lakes Dredge & Dock has a net margin of 8.27% compared to Ameresco's net margin of 1.59%. Great Lakes Dredge & Dock's return on equity of 16.46% beat Ameresco's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Ameresco1.59% 3.33% 0.82%
Great Lakes Dredge & Dock 8.27%16.46%6.48%

Great Lakes Dredge & Dock has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Ameresco. Great Lakes Dredge & Dock is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Ameresco, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Ameresco$1.98B0.75$44.28M$0.5848.05
Great Lakes Dredge & Dock$888.28M0.67$73.47M$1.078.29

Summary

Ameresco beats Great Lakes Dredge & Dock on 10 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Great Lakes Dredge & Dock compare to NWPX Infrastructure?

NWPX Infrastructure (NASDAQ:NWPX) and Great Lakes Dredge & Dock (NASDAQ:GLDD) are both small-cap construction & engineering companies, but which is the better business? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their media sentiment, analyst recommendations, earnings, risk, valuation, profitability, institutional ownership and dividends.

80.6% of NWPX Infrastructure shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 89.1% of Great Lakes Dredge & Dock shares are owned by institutional investors. 3.3% of NWPX Infrastructure shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 2.2% of Great Lakes Dredge & Dock shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

NWPX Infrastructure has a beta of 1.1, indicating that its share price is 10% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Great Lakes Dredge & Dock has a beta of 1.38, indicating that its share price is 38% more volatile than the broader market.

Great Lakes Dredge & Dock has higher revenue and earnings than NWPX Infrastructure. Great Lakes Dredge & Dock is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than NWPX Infrastructure, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
NWPX Infrastructure$526M2.37$35.41M$4.2830.19
Great Lakes Dredge & Dock$888.28M0.67$73.47M$1.078.29

Great Lakes Dredge & Dock has a net margin of 8.27% compared to NWPX Infrastructure's net margin of 7.66%. Great Lakes Dredge & Dock's return on equity of 16.46% beat NWPX Infrastructure's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
NWPX Infrastructure7.66% 10.80% 7.00%
Great Lakes Dredge & Dock 8.27%16.46%6.48%

In the previous week, NWPX Infrastructure had 8 more articles in the media than Great Lakes Dredge & Dock. MarketBeat recorded 8 mentions for NWPX Infrastructure and 0 mentions for Great Lakes Dredge & Dock. NWPX Infrastructure's average media sentiment score of 0.87 beat Great Lakes Dredge & Dock's score of 0.00 indicating that NWPX Infrastructure is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Overall Sentiment
NWPX Infrastructure Positive
Great Lakes Dredge & Dock Neutral

NWPX Infrastructure presently has a consensus price target of $110.00, indicating a potential downside of 14.87%. Great Lakes Dredge & Dock has a consensus price target of $17.00, indicating a potential upside of 91.66%. Given Great Lakes Dredge & Dock's higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Great Lakes Dredge & Dock is more favorable than NWPX Infrastructure.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
NWPX Infrastructure
0 Sell rating(s)
2 Hold rating(s)
2 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.80
Great Lakes Dredge & Dock
1 Sell rating(s)
4 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.00

Summary

NWPX Infrastructure beats Great Lakes Dredge & Dock on 10 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Great Lakes Dredge & Dock compare to Orion Group?

Orion Group (NYSE:ORN) and Great Lakes Dredge & Dock (NASDAQ:GLDD) are both small-cap construction companies, but which is the better stock? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their dividends, media sentiment, valuation, risk, earnings, profitability, institutional ownership and analyst recommendations.

Great Lakes Dredge & Dock has a net margin of 8.27% compared to Orion Group's net margin of 0.98%. Great Lakes Dredge & Dock's return on equity of 16.46% beat Orion Group's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Orion Group0.98% 4.44% 1.62%
Great Lakes Dredge & Dock 8.27%16.46%6.48%

In the previous week, Orion Group had 2 more articles in the media than Great Lakes Dredge & Dock. MarketBeat recorded 2 mentions for Orion Group and 0 mentions for Great Lakes Dredge & Dock. Orion Group's average media sentiment score of 0.56 beat Great Lakes Dredge & Dock's score of 0.00 indicating that Orion Group is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Orion Group Positive
Great Lakes Dredge & Dock Neutral

70.3% of Orion Group shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 89.1% of Great Lakes Dredge & Dock shares are owned by institutional investors. 5.7% of Orion Group shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 2.2% of Great Lakes Dredge & Dock shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Orion Group has a beta of 1.37, suggesting that its stock price is 37% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Great Lakes Dredge & Dock has a beta of 1.38, suggesting that its stock price is 38% more volatile than the broader market.

Orion Group presently has a consensus target price of $17.00, indicating a potential upside of 21.43%. Great Lakes Dredge & Dock has a consensus target price of $17.00, indicating a potential upside of 91.66%. Given Great Lakes Dredge & Dock's higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Great Lakes Dredge & Dock is more favorable than Orion Group.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Orion Group
0 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
4 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00
Great Lakes Dredge & Dock
1 Sell rating(s)
4 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.00

Great Lakes Dredge & Dock has higher revenue and earnings than Orion Group. Great Lakes Dredge & Dock is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Orion Group, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Orion Group$852.26M0.66$2.49M$0.2166.67
Great Lakes Dredge & Dock$888.28M0.67$73.47M$1.078.29

Summary

Great Lakes Dredge & Dock beats Orion Group on 10 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Great Lakes Dredge & Dock compare to Matrix Service?

Matrix Service (NASDAQ:MTRX) and Great Lakes Dredge & Dock (NASDAQ:GLDD) are both small-cap construction & engineering companies, but which is the superior stock? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their media sentiment, profitability, valuation, risk, analyst recommendations, earnings, dividends and institutional ownership.

Matrix Service currently has a consensus target price of $20.50, suggesting a potential upside of 52.19%. Great Lakes Dredge & Dock has a consensus target price of $17.00, suggesting a potential upside of 91.66%. Given Great Lakes Dredge & Dock's higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Great Lakes Dredge & Dock is more favorable than Matrix Service.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Matrix Service
1 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.67
Great Lakes Dredge & Dock
1 Sell rating(s)
4 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.00

Matrix Service has a beta of 0.99, indicating that its stock price is 1% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Great Lakes Dredge & Dock has a beta of 1.38, indicating that its stock price is 38% more volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, Matrix Service had 3 more articles in the media than Great Lakes Dredge & Dock. MarketBeat recorded 3 mentions for Matrix Service and 0 mentions for Great Lakes Dredge & Dock. Matrix Service's average media sentiment score of 0.52 beat Great Lakes Dredge & Dock's score of 0.00 indicating that Matrix Service is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Matrix Service Positive
Great Lakes Dredge & Dock Neutral

Great Lakes Dredge & Dock has a net margin of 8.27% compared to Matrix Service's net margin of -1.77%. Great Lakes Dredge & Dock's return on equity of 16.46% beat Matrix Service's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Matrix Service-1.77% -3.60% -0.81%
Great Lakes Dredge & Dock 8.27%16.46%6.48%

78.4% of Matrix Service shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 89.1% of Great Lakes Dredge & Dock shares are held by institutional investors. 4.4% of Matrix Service shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 2.2% of Great Lakes Dredge & Dock shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Great Lakes Dredge & Dock has higher revenue and earnings than Matrix Service. Matrix Service is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Great Lakes Dredge & Dock, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Matrix Service$769.29M0.49-$29.46M-$0.53N/A
Great Lakes Dredge & Dock$888.28M0.67$73.47M$1.078.29

Summary

Great Lakes Dredge & Dock beats Matrix Service on 11 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Great Lakes Dredge & Dock compare to Quanta Services?

Quanta Services (NYSE:PWR) and Great Lakes Dredge & Dock (NASDAQ:GLDD) are both construction companies, but which is the better business? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their institutional ownership, risk, earnings, profitability, analyst recommendations, dividends, valuation and media sentiment.

In the previous week, Quanta Services had 38 more articles in the media than Great Lakes Dredge & Dock. MarketBeat recorded 38 mentions for Quanta Services and 0 mentions for Great Lakes Dredge & Dock. Quanta Services' average media sentiment score of 1.24 beat Great Lakes Dredge & Dock's score of 0.00 indicating that Quanta Services is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Quanta Services Positive
Great Lakes Dredge & Dock Neutral

Great Lakes Dredge & Dock has a net margin of 8.27% compared to Quanta Services' net margin of 3.67%. Quanta Services' return on equity of 18.64% beat Great Lakes Dredge & Dock's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Quanta Services3.67% 18.64% 6.88%
Great Lakes Dredge & Dock 8.27%16.46%6.48%

Quanta Services has higher revenue and earnings than Great Lakes Dredge & Dock. Great Lakes Dredge & Dock is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Quanta Services, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Quanta Services$28.48B3.60$1.03B$7.2993.81
Great Lakes Dredge & Dock$888.28M0.67$73.47M$1.078.29

Quanta Services pays an annual dividend of $0.44 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.1%. Great Lakes Dredge & Dock pays an annual dividend of $0.0840 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.9%. Quanta Services pays out 6.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Great Lakes Dredge & Dock pays out 7.9% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Quanta Services has raised its dividend for 6 consecutive years.

Quanta Services has a beta of 1.2, indicating that its stock price is 20% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Great Lakes Dredge & Dock has a beta of 1.38, indicating that its stock price is 38% more volatile than the broader market.

Quanta Services presently has a consensus target price of $733.87, suggesting a potential upside of 7.31%. Great Lakes Dredge & Dock has a consensus target price of $17.00, suggesting a potential upside of 91.66%. Given Great Lakes Dredge & Dock's higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Great Lakes Dredge & Dock is more favorable than Quanta Services.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Quanta Services
0 Sell rating(s)
7 Hold rating(s)
19 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.78
Great Lakes Dredge & Dock
1 Sell rating(s)
4 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.00

90.5% of Quanta Services shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 89.1% of Great Lakes Dredge & Dock shares are held by institutional investors. 0.6% of Quanta Services shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 2.2% of Great Lakes Dredge & Dock shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Summary

Quanta Services beats Great Lakes Dredge & Dock on 15 of the 20 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Great Lakes Dredge & Dock News Delivered to You Automatically

Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for GLDD and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.

Subscribe Now
SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding GLDD and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.
Skip Chart

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of NASDAQ and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Skip Chart

GLDD vs. The Competition

MetricGreat Lakes Dredge & DockBLDG IndustryConstruction SectorNASDAQ Exchange
Market Cap$592.35M$17.45B$9.46B$11.73B
Dividend YieldN/A1.97%1.93%5.56%
P/E Ratio8.2923.0218.2724.35
Price / Sales0.671.334.06122.29
Price / Cash7.9416.4216.4654.62
Price / Book1.175.085.256.82
Net Income$73.47M$1.25B$564.03M$337.41M
7 Day PerformanceN/A-3.10%21.54%2.49%
1 Month PerformanceN/A-6.90%16.32%3.69%
1 Year Performance-23.80%38.87%11.67%27.72%

Great Lakes Dredge & Dock Competitors List

CompanyMarketRankShare PriceAnalysts' Price Target1Y Price PerformanceMarket CapRevenueP/E RatioEmployee CountIndicator(s)
GLDD
Great Lakes Dredge & Dock
N/A$8.87
+3.1%
$17.00
+91.7%
-23.4%$592.35M$888.28M8.29430
AMRC
Ameresco
4.2033 of 5 stars
$28.15
+1.4%
$42.56
+51.2%
+76.3%$1.49B$1.98B48.541,601
NWPX
NWPX Infrastructure
1.8029 of 5 stars
$125.24
+3.4%
$90.00
-28.1%
+227.1%$1.19B$526M28.751,318
ORN
Orion Group
4.0104 of 5 stars
$14.42
+3.8%
$17.00
+17.9%
+60.1%$579.47M$852.26M68.172,076
MTRX
Matrix Service
3.4558 of 5 stars
$13.92
+1.8%
$20.50
+47.3%
+9.7%$390.61M$845.48MN/A2,239

Related Companies and Tools


This page (NASDAQ:GLDD) was last updated on 6/12/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.
From Our Partners