NASDAQ:GLDD

Great Lakes Dredge & Dock Competitors

$15.44
+0.03 (+0.19 %)
(As of 04/23/2021 09:37 AM ET)
Add
Compare
Today's Range
$15.30
Now: $15.44
$15.44
50-Day Range
$13.68
MA: $14.87
$15.76
52-Week Range
$7.55
Now: $15.44
$16.12
Volume185 shs
Average Volume417,257 shs
Market Capitalization$1.01 billion
P/E Ratio14.04
Dividend YieldN/A
Beta0.94

Competitors

Great Lakes Dredge & Dock (NASDAQ:GLDD) Vs. PWR, ACM, MTZ, EME, KBR, and FLR

Should you be buying GLDD stock or one of its competitors? Companies in the sub-industry of "construction & engineering" are considered alternatives and competitors to Great Lakes Dredge & Dock, including Quanta Services (PWR), AECOM (ACM), MasTec (MTZ), EMCOR Group (EME), KBR (KBR), and Fluor (FLR).

Quanta Services (NYSE:PWR) and Great Lakes Dredge & Dock (NASDAQ:GLDD) are both construction companies, but which is the superior investment? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their risk, analyst recommendations, profitability, valuation, dividends, institutional ownership and earnings.

Insider & Institutional Ownership

86.5% of Quanta Services shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 83.5% of Great Lakes Dredge & Dock shares are held by institutional investors. 1.4% of Quanta Services shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 2.9% of Great Lakes Dredge & Dock shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Profitability

This table compares Quanta Services and Great Lakes Dredge & Dock's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Net MarginsReturn on EquityReturn on Assets
Quanta Services3.45%11.61%5.61%
Great Lakes Dredge & Dock9.85%22.68%7.49%

Valuation & Earnings

This table compares Quanta Services and Great Lakes Dredge & Dock's gross revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

Gross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Quanta Services$12.11 billion1.11$402.04 million$3.0531.53
Great Lakes Dredge & Dock$711.52 million1.42$49.34 million$0.8617.95

Quanta Services has higher revenue and earnings than Great Lakes Dredge & Dock. Great Lakes Dredge & Dock is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Quanta Services, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Risk and Volatility

Quanta Services has a beta of 1.24, suggesting that its stock price is 24% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Great Lakes Dredge & Dock has a beta of 0.94, suggesting that its stock price is 6% less volatile than the S&P 500.

Analyst Ratings

This is a summary of current recommendations for Quanta Services and Great Lakes Dredge & Dock, as reported by MarketBeat.com.

Sell RatingsHold RatingsBuy RatingsStrong Buy RatingsRating Score
Quanta Services03702.70
Great Lakes Dredge & Dock00103.00

Quanta Services currently has a consensus target price of $76.20, suggesting a potential downside of 20.56%. Great Lakes Dredge & Dock has a consensus target price of $14.35, suggesting a potential downside of 6.88%. Given Great Lakes Dredge & Dock's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Great Lakes Dredge & Dock is more favorable than Quanta Services.

AECOM (NYSE:ACM) and Great Lakes Dredge & Dock (NASDAQ:GLDD) are both construction companies, but which is the superior investment? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their risk, analyst recommendations, profitability, valuation, dividends, institutional ownership and earnings.

Profitability

This table compares AECOM and Great Lakes Dredge & Dock's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Net MarginsReturn on EquityReturn on Assets
AECOM-1.41%9.37%2.55%
Great Lakes Dredge & Dock9.85%22.68%7.49%

Insider & Institutional Ownership

88.8% of AECOM shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 83.5% of Great Lakes Dredge & Dock shares are held by institutional investors. 4.9% of AECOM shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 2.9% of Great Lakes Dredge & Dock shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Risk and Volatility

AECOM has a beta of 1.61, suggesting that its stock price is 61% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Great Lakes Dredge & Dock has a beta of 0.94, suggesting that its stock price is 6% less volatile than the S&P 500.

Valuation & Earnings

This table compares AECOM and Great Lakes Dredge & Dock's gross revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

Gross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
AECOM$13.24 billion0.74$-186,370,000.00$2.1530.98
Great Lakes Dredge & Dock$711.52 million1.42$49.34 million$0.8617.95

Great Lakes Dredge & Dock has lower revenue, but higher earnings than AECOM. Great Lakes Dredge & Dock is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than AECOM, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Analyst Ratings

This is a summary of current recommendations for AECOM and Great Lakes Dredge & Dock, as reported by MarketBeat.com.

Sell RatingsHold RatingsBuy RatingsStrong Buy RatingsRating Score
AECOM01602.86
Great Lakes Dredge & Dock00103.00

AECOM currently has a consensus target price of $62.8889, suggesting a potential downside of 5.59%. Great Lakes Dredge & Dock has a consensus target price of $14.35, suggesting a potential downside of 6.88%. Given AECOM's higher possible upside, research analysts clearly believe AECOM is more favorable than Great Lakes Dredge & Dock.

MasTec (NYSE:MTZ) and Great Lakes Dredge & Dock (NASDAQ:GLDD) are both construction companies, but which is the better investment? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their valuation, risk, analyst recommendations, profitability, institutional ownership, dividends and earnings.

Profitability

This table compares MasTec and Great Lakes Dredge & Dock's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Net MarginsReturn on EquityReturn on Assets
MasTec4.86%18.75%6.64%
Great Lakes Dredge & Dock9.85%22.68%7.49%

Insider and Institutional Ownership

82.5% of MasTec shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 83.5% of Great Lakes Dredge & Dock shares are owned by institutional investors. 23.9% of MasTec shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 2.9% of Great Lakes Dredge & Dock shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Risk and Volatility

MasTec has a beta of 1.38, suggesting that its share price is 38% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Great Lakes Dredge & Dock has a beta of 0.94, suggesting that its share price is 6% less volatile than the S&P 500.

Valuation and Earnings

This table compares MasTec and Great Lakes Dredge & Dock's gross revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

Gross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
MasTec$7.18 billion1.02$392.33 million$5.0919.33
Great Lakes Dredge & Dock$711.52 million1.42$49.34 million$0.8617.95

MasTec has higher revenue and earnings than Great Lakes Dredge & Dock. Great Lakes Dredge & Dock is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than MasTec, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a summary of current ratings for MasTec and Great Lakes Dredge & Dock, as reported by MarketBeat.com.

Sell RatingsHold RatingsBuy RatingsStrong Buy RatingsRating Score
MasTec001103.00
Great Lakes Dredge & Dock00103.00

MasTec presently has a consensus target price of $82.5833, suggesting a potential downside of 16.05%. Great Lakes Dredge & Dock has a consensus target price of $14.35, suggesting a potential downside of 6.88%. Given Great Lakes Dredge & Dock's higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Great Lakes Dredge & Dock is more favorable than MasTec.

Summary

MasTec beats Great Lakes Dredge & Dock on 7 of the 13 factors compared between the two stocks.

EMCOR Group (NYSE:EME) and Great Lakes Dredge & Dock (NASDAQ:GLDD) are both construction companies, but which is the better investment? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their valuation, risk, analyst recommendations, profitability, institutional ownership, dividends and earnings.

Profitability

This table compares EMCOR Group and Great Lakes Dredge & Dock's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Net MarginsReturn on EquityReturn on Assets
EMCOR Group1.57%16.86%7.10%
Great Lakes Dredge & Dock9.85%22.68%7.49%

Insider and Institutional Ownership

93.3% of EMCOR Group shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 83.5% of Great Lakes Dredge & Dock shares are owned by institutional investors. 1.9% of EMCOR Group shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 2.9% of Great Lakes Dredge & Dock shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Risk and Volatility

EMCOR Group has a beta of 1.18, suggesting that its share price is 18% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Great Lakes Dredge & Dock has a beta of 0.94, suggesting that its share price is 6% less volatile than the S&P 500.

Valuation and Earnings

This table compares EMCOR Group and Great Lakes Dredge & Dock's gross revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

Gross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
EMCOR Group$9.17 billion0.71$325.14 million$5.7520.68
Great Lakes Dredge & Dock$711.52 million1.42$49.34 million$0.8617.95

EMCOR Group has higher revenue and earnings than Great Lakes Dredge & Dock. Great Lakes Dredge & Dock is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than EMCOR Group, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a summary of current ratings for EMCOR Group and Great Lakes Dredge & Dock, as reported by MarketBeat.com.

Sell RatingsHold RatingsBuy RatingsStrong Buy RatingsRating Score
EMCOR Group02002.00
Great Lakes Dredge & Dock00103.00

EMCOR Group presently has a consensus target price of $96.00, suggesting a potential downside of 19.25%. Great Lakes Dredge & Dock has a consensus target price of $14.35, suggesting a potential downside of 6.88%. Given Great Lakes Dredge & Dock's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Great Lakes Dredge & Dock is more favorable than EMCOR Group.

Summary

Great Lakes Dredge & Dock beats EMCOR Group on 8 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

KBR (NYSE:KBR) and Great Lakes Dredge & Dock (NASDAQ:GLDD) are both construction companies, but which is the better investment? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their valuation, risk, analyst recommendations, profitability, institutional ownership, dividends and earnings.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a summary of current ratings for KBR and Great Lakes Dredge & Dock, as reported by MarketBeat.com.

Sell RatingsHold RatingsBuy RatingsStrong Buy RatingsRating Score
KBR01802.89
Great Lakes Dredge & Dock00103.00

KBR presently has a consensus target price of $37.0769, suggesting a potential downside of 6.54%. Great Lakes Dredge & Dock has a consensus target price of $14.35, suggesting a potential downside of 6.88%. Given KBR's higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe KBR is more favorable than Great Lakes Dredge & Dock.

Risk and Volatility

KBR has a beta of 1.39, suggesting that its share price is 39% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Great Lakes Dredge & Dock has a beta of 0.94, suggesting that its share price is 6% less volatile than the S&P 500.

Profitability

This table compares KBR and Great Lakes Dredge & Dock's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Net MarginsReturn on EquityReturn on Assets
KBR-0.57%13.98%4.62%
Great Lakes Dredge & Dock9.85%22.68%7.49%

Valuation and Earnings

This table compares KBR and Great Lakes Dredge & Dock's gross revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

Gross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
KBR$5.64 billion0.99$202 million$1.6923.47
Great Lakes Dredge & Dock$711.52 million1.42$49.34 million$0.8617.95

KBR has higher revenue and earnings than Great Lakes Dredge & Dock. Great Lakes Dredge & Dock is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than KBR, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Insider and Institutional Ownership

98.2% of KBR shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 83.5% of Great Lakes Dredge & Dock shares are owned by institutional investors. 1.0% of KBR shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 2.9% of Great Lakes Dredge & Dock shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Great Lakes Dredge & Dock (NASDAQ:GLDD) and Fluor (NYSE:FLR) are both construction companies, but which is the superior business? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their risk, dividends, profitability, analyst recommendations, valuation, institutional ownership and earnings.

Insider & Institutional Ownership

83.5% of Great Lakes Dredge & Dock shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 64.6% of Fluor shares are owned by institutional investors. 2.9% of Great Lakes Dredge & Dock shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.8% of Fluor shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Analyst Ratings

This is a breakdown of current recommendations and price targets for Great Lakes Dredge & Dock and Fluor, as reported by MarketBeat.

Sell RatingsHold RatingsBuy RatingsStrong Buy RatingsRating Score
Great Lakes Dredge & Dock00103.00
Fluor04102.20

Great Lakes Dredge & Dock presently has a consensus target price of $14.35, indicating a potential downside of 6.88%. Fluor has a consensus target price of $16.75, indicating a potential downside of 22.02%. Given Great Lakes Dredge & Dock's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, equities research analysts plainly believe Great Lakes Dredge & Dock is more favorable than Fluor.

Earnings & Valuation

This table compares Great Lakes Dredge & Dock and Fluor's revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

Gross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Great Lakes Dredge & Dock$711.52 million1.42$49.34 million$0.8617.95
Fluor$14.35 billion0.21$-1,522,160,000.00$2.997.24

Great Lakes Dredge & Dock has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Fluor. Fluor is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Great Lakes Dredge & Dock, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Profitability

This table compares Great Lakes Dredge & Dock and Fluor's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Net MarginsReturn on EquityReturn on Assets
Great Lakes Dredge & Dock9.85%22.68%7.49%
Fluor-3.63%10.56%1.89%

Volatility and Risk

Great Lakes Dredge & Dock has a beta of 0.94, suggesting that its share price is 6% less volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Fluor has a beta of 2.85, suggesting that its share price is 185% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Summary

Great Lakes Dredge & Dock beats Fluor on 10 of the 13 factors compared between the two stocks.


Great Lakes Dredge & Dock Competitors List

Competitor NameCompetitor BTM RankCompetitor PriceCompetitor Price ChangeCompetitor Market CapCompetitor RevenueCompetitor P/E RatioCompetitor Indicator(s)
Quanta Services logo
PWR
Quanta Services
1.9$96.16+0.2%$13.38 billion$12.11 billion35.48
AECOM logo
ACM
AECOM
1.5$66.61+0.3%$9.84 billion$13.24 billion-56.45Analyst Report
Analyst Revision
MasTec logo
MTZ
MasTec
1.5$98.37+0.7%$7.30 billion$7.18 billion23.53Upcoming Earnings
Analyst Report
EMCOR Group logo
EME
EMCOR Group
1.3$118.89+0.3%$6.51 billion$9.17 billion47.94Upcoming Earnings
Analyst Revision
News Coverage
KBR logo
KBR
KBR
1.8$39.66+0.0%$5.60 billion$5.64 billion-158.64Upcoming Earnings
Analyst Report
Analyst Revision
Fluor logo
FLR
Fluor
1.3$21.66+0.8%$3.03 billion$14.35 billion-5.35Analyst Report
Analyst Revision
Dycom Industries logo
DY
Dycom Industries
1.6$95.24+3.0%$2.89 billion$3.34 billion116.15Analyst Revision
Comfort Systems USA logo
FIX
Comfort Systems USA
1.8$79.32+1.4%$2.88 billion$2.62 billion20.66Upcoming Earnings
Analyst Revision
Ameresco logo
AMRC
Ameresco
2.0$48.40+1.0%$2.46 billion$866.93 million44.40
Granite Construction logo
GVA
Granite Construction
1.7$38.88+0.1%$1.77 billion$3.32 billion0.00Analyst Upgrade
Primoris Services logo
PRIM
Primoris Services
1.8$33.17+2.1%$1.62 billion$3.11 billion16.34Analyst Downgrade
Analyst Revision
Gap Up
MYR Group logo
MYRG
MYR Group
1.4$68.97+1.0%$1.16 billion$2.07 billion21.76Upcoming Earnings
Analyst Revision
Aegion logo
AEGN
Aegion
1.3$30.38+0.8%$933.88 million$1.21 billion-22.84
Tutor Perini logo
TPC
Tutor Perini
1.6$16.39+1.4%$834.63 million$4.45 billion-58.54
Argan logo
AGX
Argan
1.7$50.77+3.1%$798.10 million$239 million112.82Insider Selling
Sterling Construction logo
STRL
Sterling Construction
1.3$20.33+0.4%$581.42 million$1.13 billion9.73Analyst Downgrade
Analyst Revision
Northwest Pipe logo
NWPX
Northwest Pipe
1.3$32.60+0.7%$319.94 million$279.32 million12.44
Orion Group logo
ORN
Orion Group
1.4$5.71+1.2%$169.60 million$708.39 million10.20Upcoming Earnings
News Coverage
Hill International logo
HIL
Hill International
0.8$2.69+2.2%$151.93 million$376.44 million24.46
This page was last updated on 4/23/2021 by MarketBeat.com Staff
MarketBeat - Stock Market News and Research Tools logo

MarketBeat empowers individual investors to make better trading decisions by providing real-time financial data and objective market analysis. Whether you’re looking for analyst ratings, corporate buybacks, dividends, earnings, economic reports, financials, insider trades, IPOs, SEC filings or stock splits, MarketBeat has the objective information you need to analyze any stock. Learn more.

MarketBeat is accredited by the Better Business Bureau

© American Consumer News, LLC dba MarketBeat® 2010-2021. All rights reserved.
326 E 8th St #105, Sioux Falls, SD 57103 | U.S. Based Support Team at [email protected] | (844) 978-6257
MarketBeat does not provide personalized financial advice and does not issue recommendations or offers to buy stock or sell any security. Learn more.

Our Accessibility Statement | Terms of Service | Do Not Sell My Information

© 2021 Market data provided is at least 10-minutes delayed and hosted by Barchart Solutions. Information is provided 'as-is' and solely for informational purposes, not for trading purposes or advice, and is delayed. To see all exchange delays and terms of use please see disclaimer. Fundamental company data provided by Zacks Investment Research. As a bonus to opt-ing into our email newsletters, you will also get a free subscription to the Liberty Through Wealth e-newsletter. You can opt out at any time.