Northwest Pipe Competitors

Quanta Services (NYSE:PWR) and Northwest Pipe (NASDAQ:NWPX) are both construction companies, but which is the better stock? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their earnings, institutional ownership, dividends, valuation, analyst recommendations, profitability and risk.

Risk and Volatility

Quanta Services has a beta of 1.24, meaning that its stock price is 24% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Northwest Pipe has a beta of 0.88, meaning that its stock price is 12% less volatile than the S&P 500.

Insider & Institutional Ownership

86.5% of Quanta Services shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 82.3% of Northwest Pipe shares are owned by institutional investors. 1.4% of Quanta Services shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 2.6% of Northwest Pipe shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Valuation and Earnings

This table compares Quanta Services and Northwest Pipe's revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

Quanta Services has higher revenue and earnings than Northwest Pipe. Northwest Pipe is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Quanta Services, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a breakdown of recent ratings and recommmendations for Quanta Services and Northwest Pipe, as provided by MarketBeat.com.

Quanta Services presently has a consensus target price of $73.70, suggesting a potential downside of 22.92%. Northwest Pipe has a consensus target price of $33.00, suggesting a potential upside of 1.66%. Given Northwest Pipe's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Northwest Pipe is more favorable than Quanta Services.

Profitability

This table compares Quanta Services and Northwest Pipe's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Summary

Quanta Services beats Northwest Pipe on 8 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

Northwest Pipe (NASDAQ:NWPX) and AECOM (NYSE:ACM) are both industrial products companies, but which is the better investment? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, risk, dividends, profitability, earnings, institutional ownership and valuation.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a summary of recent ratings for Northwest Pipe and AECOM, as provided by MarketBeat.com.

Northwest Pipe currently has a consensus target price of $33.00, suggesting a potential upside of 1.66%. AECOM has a consensus target price of $57.5556, suggesting a potential downside of 14.66%. Given Northwest Pipe's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Northwest Pipe is more favorable than AECOM.

Valuation and Earnings

This table compares Northwest Pipe and AECOM's top-line revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

Northwest Pipe has higher earnings, but lower revenue than AECOM. Northwest Pipe is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than AECOM, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Institutional & Insider Ownership

82.3% of Northwest Pipe shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 88.8% of AECOM shares are held by institutional investors. 2.6% of Northwest Pipe shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 4.9% of AECOM shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Risk & Volatility

Northwest Pipe has a beta of 0.88, indicating that its share price is 12% less volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, AECOM has a beta of 1.61, indicating that its share price is 61% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Profitability

This table compares Northwest Pipe and AECOM's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Summary

Northwest Pipe beats AECOM on 9 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

Northwest Pipe (NASDAQ:NWPX) and MasTec (NYSE:MTZ) are both industrial products companies, but which is the better business? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their profitability, valuation, dividends, earnings, analyst recommendations, institutional ownership and risk.

Insider & Institutional Ownership

82.3% of Northwest Pipe shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 82.5% of MasTec shares are owned by institutional investors. 2.6% of Northwest Pipe shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 23.9% of MasTec shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a breakdown of current recommendations for Northwest Pipe and MasTec, as provided by MarketBeat.

Northwest Pipe currently has a consensus price target of $33.00, suggesting a potential upside of 1.66%. MasTec has a consensus price target of $77.3636, suggesting a potential downside of 23.15%. Given Northwest Pipe's higher probable upside, research analysts clearly believe Northwest Pipe is more favorable than MasTec.

Risk & Volatility

Northwest Pipe has a beta of 0.88, indicating that its share price is 12% less volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, MasTec has a beta of 1.38, indicating that its share price is 38% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Valuation & Earnings

This table compares Northwest Pipe and MasTec's revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

MasTec has higher revenue and earnings than Northwest Pipe. Northwest Pipe is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than MasTec, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Profitability

This table compares Northwest Pipe and MasTec's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Summary

MasTec beats Northwest Pipe on 9 of the 13 factors compared between the two stocks.

EMCOR Group (NYSE:EME) and Northwest Pipe (NASDAQ:NWPX) are both construction companies, but which is the superior investment? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their institutional ownership, valuation, risk, analyst recommendations, earnings, dividends and profitability.

Volatility & Risk

EMCOR Group has a beta of 1.18, meaning that its share price is 18% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Northwest Pipe has a beta of 0.88, meaning that its share price is 12% less volatile than the S&P 500.

Insider & Institutional Ownership

93.3% of EMCOR Group shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 82.3% of Northwest Pipe shares are held by institutional investors. 1.9% of EMCOR Group shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 2.6% of Northwest Pipe shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Earnings & Valuation

This table compares EMCOR Group and Northwest Pipe's revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

EMCOR Group has higher revenue and earnings than Northwest Pipe. Northwest Pipe is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than EMCOR Group, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Profitability

This table compares EMCOR Group and Northwest Pipe's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Analyst Ratings

This is a breakdown of current ratings and target prices for EMCOR Group and Northwest Pipe, as provided by MarketBeat.

EMCOR Group currently has a consensus price target of $84.00, suggesting a potential downside of 30.24%. Northwest Pipe has a consensus price target of $33.00, suggesting a potential upside of 1.66%. Given Northwest Pipe's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Northwest Pipe is more favorable than EMCOR Group.

KBR (NYSE:KBR) and Northwest Pipe (NASDAQ:NWPX) are both construction companies, but which is the better stock? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their profitability, earnings, analyst recommendations, dividends, risk, institutional ownership and valuation.

Valuation & Earnings

This table compares KBR and Northwest Pipe's gross revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

KBR has higher revenue and earnings than Northwest Pipe. Northwest Pipe is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than KBR, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Institutional & Insider Ownership

98.2% of KBR shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 82.3% of Northwest Pipe shares are held by institutional investors. 1.0% of KBR shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 2.6% of Northwest Pipe shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Profitability

This table compares KBR and Northwest Pipe's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Volatility and Risk

KBR has a beta of 1.39, suggesting that its share price is 39% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Northwest Pipe has a beta of 0.88, suggesting that its share price is 12% less volatile than the S&P 500.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a breakdown of current recommendations and price targets for KBR and Northwest Pipe, as provided by MarketBeat.com.

KBR currently has a consensus price target of $35.0833, suggesting a potential downside of 12.71%. Northwest Pipe has a consensus price target of $33.00, suggesting a potential upside of 1.66%. Given Northwest Pipe's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Northwest Pipe is more favorable than KBR.

Summary

Northwest Pipe beats KBR on 8 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

Fluor (NYSE:FLR) and Northwest Pipe (NASDAQ:NWPX) are both construction companies, but which is the superior investment? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their institutional ownership, earnings, risk, profitability, valuation, analyst recommendations and dividends.

Profitability

This table compares Fluor and Northwest Pipe's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a breakdown of recent ratings for Fluor and Northwest Pipe, as provided by MarketBeat.

Fluor currently has a consensus price target of $15.50, indicating a potential downside of 31.17%. Northwest Pipe has a consensus price target of $33.00, indicating a potential upside of 1.66%. Given Northwest Pipe's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Northwest Pipe is more favorable than Fluor.

Earnings and Valuation

This table compares Fluor and Northwest Pipe's revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

Northwest Pipe has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Fluor. Fluor is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Northwest Pipe, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Insider & Institutional Ownership

64.6% of Fluor shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 82.3% of Northwest Pipe shares are held by institutional investors. 0.8% of Fluor shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 2.6% of Northwest Pipe shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Volatility and Risk

Fluor has a beta of 2.85, meaning that its stock price is 185% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Northwest Pipe has a beta of 0.88, meaning that its stock price is 12% less volatile than the S&P 500.

Summary

Northwest Pipe beats Fluor on 11 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.