Quanta Services Competitors

Quanta Services (NYSE:PWR) and Jacobs Engineering Group (NYSE:JEC) are both large-cap construction companies, but which is the better stock? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their valuation, dividends, risk, institutional ownership, earnings, analyst recommendations and profitability.

Profitability

This table compares Quanta Services and Jacobs Engineering Group's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Analyst Ratings

This is a summary of recent ratings for Quanta Services and Jacobs Engineering Group, as provided by MarketBeat.com.

Quanta Services currently has a consensus price target of $65.6364, indicating a potential downside of 15.48%. Given Quanta Services' higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Quanta Services is more favorable than Jacobs Engineering Group.

Dividends

Quanta Services pays an annual dividend of $0.24 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.3%. Jacobs Engineering Group pays an annual dividend of $0.68 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.6%. Quanta Services pays out 7.9% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Jacobs Engineering Group pays out 13.5% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Quanta Services has increased its dividend for 1 consecutive years.

Risk and Volatility

Quanta Services has a beta of 1.24, meaning that its share price is 24% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Jacobs Engineering Group has a beta of 1.35, meaning that its share price is 35% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Insider and Institutional Ownership

86.5% of Quanta Services shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 90.6% of Jacobs Engineering Group shares are held by institutional investors. 1.4% of Quanta Services shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 1.0% of Jacobs Engineering Group shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Earnings and Valuation

This table compares Quanta Services and Jacobs Engineering Group's top-line revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

Jacobs Engineering Group has higher revenue and earnings than Quanta Services. Jacobs Engineering Group is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Quanta Services, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

AECOM (NYSE:ACM) and Quanta Services (NYSE:PWR) are both construction companies, but which is the better investment? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their institutional ownership, risk, dividends, profitability, analyst recommendations, earnings and valuation.

Profitability

This table compares AECOM and Quanta Services' net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Valuation & Earnings

This table compares AECOM and Quanta Services' top-line revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

Quanta Services has lower revenue, but higher earnings than AECOM. AECOM is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Quanta Services, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Institutional and Insider Ownership

88.8% of AECOM shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 86.5% of Quanta Services shares are held by institutional investors. 4.9% of AECOM shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 1.4% of Quanta Services shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Volatility & Risk

AECOM has a beta of 1.61, indicating that its stock price is 61% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Quanta Services has a beta of 1.24, indicating that its stock price is 24% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Analyst Ratings

This is a summary of recent ratings for AECOM and Quanta Services, as provided by MarketBeat.com.

AECOM currently has a consensus price target of $55.3333, indicating a potential upside of 3.08%. Quanta Services has a consensus price target of $65.6364, indicating a potential downside of 15.48%. Given AECOM's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, research analysts plainly believe AECOM is more favorable than Quanta Services.

Summary

Quanta Services beats AECOM on 8 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

Quanta Services (NYSE:PWR) and MasTec (NYSE:MTZ) are both construction companies, but which is the better stock? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their valuation, dividends, risk, profitability, analyst recommendations, earnings and institutional ownership.

Profitability

This table compares Quanta Services and MasTec's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Risk and Volatility

Quanta Services has a beta of 1.24, suggesting that its stock price is 24% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, MasTec has a beta of 1.38, suggesting that its stock price is 38% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a summary of recent recommendations for Quanta Services and MasTec, as provided by MarketBeat.com.

Quanta Services presently has a consensus target price of $65.6364, suggesting a potential downside of 15.48%. MasTec has a consensus target price of $66.6667, suggesting a potential downside of 19.00%. Given Quanta Services' higher probable upside, equities analysts clearly believe Quanta Services is more favorable than MasTec.

Institutional and Insider Ownership

86.5% of Quanta Services shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 82.5% of MasTec shares are held by institutional investors. 1.4% of Quanta Services shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 23.9% of MasTec shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Valuation & Earnings

This table compares Quanta Services and MasTec's gross revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

Quanta Services has higher revenue and earnings than MasTec. MasTec is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Quanta Services, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Summary

MasTec beats Quanta Services on 8 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

Quanta Services (NYSE:PWR) and EMCOR Group (NYSE:EME) are both construction companies, but which is the better business? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, risk, institutional ownership, valuation, dividends, earnings and profitability.

Institutional & Insider Ownership

86.5% of Quanta Services shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 93.3% of EMCOR Group shares are owned by institutional investors. 1.4% of Quanta Services shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 1.9% of EMCOR Group shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Dividends

Quanta Services pays an annual dividend of $0.24 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.3%. EMCOR Group pays an annual dividend of $0.52 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.5%. Quanta Services pays out 7.9% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. EMCOR Group pays out 9.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Quanta Services has raised its dividend for 1 consecutive years and EMCOR Group has raised its dividend for 1 consecutive years.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a summary of recent ratings and target prices for Quanta Services and EMCOR Group, as reported by MarketBeat.

Quanta Services presently has a consensus target price of $65.6364, suggesting a potential downside of 15.48%. EMCOR Group has a consensus target price of $84.00, suggesting a potential downside of 13.64%. Given EMCOR Group's higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe EMCOR Group is more favorable than Quanta Services.

Profitability

This table compares Quanta Services and EMCOR Group's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Valuation and Earnings

This table compares Quanta Services and EMCOR Group's gross revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

Quanta Services has higher revenue and earnings than EMCOR Group. EMCOR Group is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Quanta Services, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Risk & Volatility

Quanta Services has a beta of 1.24, meaning that its share price is 24% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, EMCOR Group has a beta of 1.18, meaning that its share price is 18% more volatile than the S&P 500.

KBR (NYSE:KBR) and Quanta Services (NYSE:PWR) are both construction companies, but which is the better stock? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their valuation, profitability, dividends, analyst recommendations, institutional ownership, earnings and risk.

Dividends

KBR pays an annual dividend of $0.40 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.3%. Quanta Services pays an annual dividend of $0.24 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.3%. KBR pays out 23.7% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Quanta Services pays out 7.9% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. KBR has raised its dividend for 1 consecutive years and Quanta Services has raised its dividend for 1 consecutive years.

Profitability

This table compares KBR and Quanta Services' net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a breakdown of recent ratings and target prices for KBR and Quanta Services, as provided by MarketBeat.

KBR currently has a consensus target price of $32.7273, indicating a potential upside of 6.85%. Quanta Services has a consensus target price of $65.6364, indicating a potential downside of 15.48%. Given KBR's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe KBR is more favorable than Quanta Services.

Institutional and Insider Ownership

98.2% of KBR shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 86.5% of Quanta Services shares are owned by institutional investors. 1.0% of KBR shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 1.4% of Quanta Services shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Earnings & Valuation

This table compares KBR and Quanta Services' gross revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

Quanta Services has higher revenue and earnings than KBR. KBR is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Quanta Services, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Volatility & Risk

KBR has a beta of 1.39, indicating that its share price is 39% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Quanta Services has a beta of 1.24, indicating that its share price is 24% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Summary

Quanta Services beats KBR on 9 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

Quanta Services (NYSE:PWR) and Fluor (NYSE:FLR) are both construction companies, but which is the superior business? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their valuation, earnings, dividends, institutional ownership, profitability, analyst recommendations and risk.

Profitability

This table compares Quanta Services and Fluor's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Earnings & Valuation

This table compares Quanta Services and Fluor's top-line revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

Quanta Services has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Fluor. Fluor is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Quanta Services, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Risk and Volatility

Quanta Services has a beta of 1.24, meaning that its stock price is 24% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Fluor has a beta of 2.85, meaning that its stock price is 185% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Institutional & Insider Ownership

86.5% of Quanta Services shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 64.6% of Fluor shares are owned by institutional investors. 1.4% of Quanta Services shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.8% of Fluor shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a summary of recent ratings and recommmendations for Quanta Services and Fluor, as reported by MarketBeat.

Quanta Services presently has a consensus price target of $65.6364, indicating a potential downside of 15.48%. Fluor has a consensus price target of $13.3333, indicating a potential downside of 34.80%. Given Quanta Services' stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Quanta Services is more favorable than Fluor.

Summary

Quanta Services beats Fluor on 12 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.