Is PWR or MYRG more profitable?

MYR Group has a net margin of 4.13% compared to Quanta Services' net margin of 4.03%. MYR Group's return on equity of 24.17% beat Quanta Services' return on equity. Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets Quanta Services 4.03% 20.55% 7.34% MYR Group 4.13% 24.17% 9.96%

Does the media refer more to PWR or MYRG?

In the previous week, Quanta Services had 21 more articles in the media than MYR Group. MarketBeat recorded 30 mentions for Quanta Services and 9 mentions for MYR Group. MYR Group's average media sentiment score of 1.41 beat Quanta Services' score of 1.23 indicating that MYR Group is being referred to more favorably in the news media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment Quanta Services 22 Very Positive mention(s) 5 Positive mention(s) 2 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive MYR Group 6 Very Positive mention(s) 1 Positive mention(s) 2 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive

Which has better earnings and valuation, PWR or ACM?

Quanta Services has higher revenue and earnings than AECOM. AECOM is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Quanta Services, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks. Company Gross Revenue Price/Sales Ratio Net Income Earnings Per Share Price/Earnings Ratio Quanta Services $28.48B 3.29 $1.03B $8.73 71.45 AECOM $16.14B 0.53 $561.77M $2.18 30.54

Is PWR or ACM more profitable?

Quanta Services has a net margin of 4.03% compared to AECOM's net margin of 1.87%. Quanta Services' return on equity of 20.55% beat AECOM's return on equity. Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets Quanta Services 4.03% 20.55% 7.34% AECOM 1.87% 19.72% 4.10%

Does the media refer more to PWR or ACM?

In the previous week, Quanta Services had 19 more articles in the media than AECOM. MarketBeat recorded 30 mentions for Quanta Services and 11 mentions for AECOM. Quanta Services' average media sentiment score of 1.23 beat AECOM's score of 1.17 indicating that Quanta Services is being referred to more favorably in the media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment Quanta Services 22 Very Positive mention(s) 5 Positive mention(s) 2 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive AECOM 8 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 3 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive

Does the media prefer PWR or EME?

In the previous week, Quanta Services had 18 more articles in the media than EMCOR Group. MarketBeat recorded 30 mentions for Quanta Services and 12 mentions for EMCOR Group. EMCOR Group's average media sentiment score of 1.49 beat Quanta Services' score of 1.23 indicating that EMCOR Group is being referred to more favorably in the news media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment Quanta Services 22 Very Positive mention(s) 5 Positive mention(s) 2 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive EMCOR Group 12 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 0 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive

Is ETN or PWR more profitable?

Eaton has a net margin of 12.75% compared to Quanta Services' net margin of 4.03%. Eaton's return on equity of 24.58% beat Quanta Services' return on equity. Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets Eaton 12.75% 24.58% 9.98% Quanta Services 4.03% 20.55% 7.34%

Does the media favor ETN or PWR?

In the previous week, Eaton had 20 more articles in the media than Quanta Services. MarketBeat recorded 50 mentions for Eaton and 30 mentions for Quanta Services. Quanta Services' average media sentiment score of 1.23 beat Eaton's score of 0.92 indicating that Quanta Services is being referred to more favorably in the news media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment Eaton 23 Very Positive mention(s) 3 Positive mention(s) 11 Neutral mention(s) 1 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive Quanta Services 22 Very Positive mention(s) 5 Positive mention(s) 2 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive

Does the media prefer PWR or FIX?

In the previous week, Quanta Services had 11 more articles in the media than Comfort Systems USA. MarketBeat recorded 30 mentions for Quanta Services and 19 mentions for Comfort Systems USA. Comfort Systems USA's average media sentiment score of 1.41 beat Quanta Services' score of 1.23 indicating that Comfort Systems USA is being referred to more favorably in the news media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment Quanta Services 22 Very Positive mention(s) 5 Positive mention(s) 2 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive Comfort Systems USA 17 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 0 Neutral mention(s) 1 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive

Quanta Services (PWR) Competitors

$623.80 -0.61 (-0.10%)

As of 09/4/2026 03:58 PM Eastern

Compare

PWR vs. MYRG, ACM, EME, ETN, and FIX

Should you buy Quanta Services stock or one of its competitors? Quanta Services's main competitors and comparable companies include MYR Group (MYRG), AECOM (ACM), EMCOR Group (EME), Eaton (ETN), and Comfort Systems USA (FIX). Companies are selected based on similarities in market, industry, and size. These companies are all part of the "industrials" sector.

How does Quanta Services compare to MYR Group?

Quanta Services (NYSE:PWR) and MYR Group (NASDAQ:MYRG) are both industrials companies, but which is the superior business? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their valuation, earnings, profitability, media sentiment, dividends, analyst recommendations, risk and institutional ownership.

MYR Group has a net margin of 4.13% compared to Quanta Services' net margin of 4.03%. MYR Group's return on equity of 24.17% beat Quanta Services' return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Quanta Services	4.03%	20.55%	7.34%
MYR Group	4.13%	24.17%	9.96%

Quanta Services has a beta of 1.2, suggesting that its stock price is 20% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, MYR Group has a beta of 1.31, suggesting that its stock price is 31% more volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, Quanta Services had 21 more articles in the media than MYR Group. MarketBeat recorded 30 mentions for Quanta Services and 9 mentions for MYR Group. MYR Group's average media sentiment score of 1.41 beat Quanta Services' score of 1.23 indicating that MYR Group is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Quanta Services	22 Very Positive mention(s)	5 Positive mention(s)	2 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive
MYR Group	6 Very Positive mention(s)	1 Positive mention(s)	2 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive

90.5% of Quanta Services shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 88.9% of MYR Group shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.6% of Quanta Services shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 1.9% of MYR Group shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Quanta Services presently has a consensus price target of $769.25, suggesting a potential upside of 23.32%. MYR Group has a consensus price target of $451.20, suggesting a potential upside of 57.44%. Given MYR Group's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe MYR Group is more favorable than Quanta Services.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Quanta Services	3 Sell rating(s)	8 Hold rating(s)	20 Buy rating(s)	1 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.59
MYR Group	0 Sell rating(s)	4 Hold rating(s)	2 Buy rating(s)	2 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.75

Quanta Services has higher revenue and earnings than MYR Group. MYR Group is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Quanta Services, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Quanta Services	$28.48B	3.29	$1.03B	$8.73	71.45
MYR Group	$3.66B	1.22	$118.42M	$10.54	27.19

Summary

MYR Group beats Quanta Services on 10 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Quanta Services compare to AECOM?

Quanta Services (NYSE:PWR) and AECOM (NYSE:ACM) are both industrials companies, but which is the better business? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their dividends, earnings, analyst recommendations, institutional ownership, valuation, media sentiment, risk and profitability.

Quanta Services pays an annual dividend of $0.44 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.1%. AECOM pays an annual dividend of $1.24 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.9%. Quanta Services pays out 5.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. AECOM pays out 56.9% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Quanta Services has raised its dividend for 6 consecutive years and AECOM has raised its dividend for 3 consecutive years.

Quanta Services has a beta of 1.2, indicating that its stock price is 20% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, AECOM has a beta of 0.91, indicating that its stock price is 9% less volatile than the broader market.

Quanta Services currently has a consensus price target of $769.25, indicating a potential upside of 23.32%. AECOM has a consensus price target of $88.25, indicating a potential upside of 32.57%. Given AECOM's higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe AECOM is more favorable than Quanta Services.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Quanta Services	3 Sell rating(s)	8 Hold rating(s)	20 Buy rating(s)	1 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.59
AECOM	2 Sell rating(s)	2 Hold rating(s)	9 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.54

Quanta Services has higher revenue and earnings than AECOM. AECOM is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Quanta Services, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Quanta Services	$28.48B	3.29	$1.03B	$8.73	71.45
AECOM	$16.14B	0.53	$561.77M	$2.18	30.54

90.5% of Quanta Services shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 85.4% of AECOM shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.6% of Quanta Services shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.5% of AECOM shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

In the previous week, Quanta Services had 19 more articles in the media than AECOM. MarketBeat recorded 30 mentions for Quanta Services and 11 mentions for AECOM. Quanta Services' average media sentiment score of 1.23 beat AECOM's score of 1.17 indicating that Quanta Services is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Quanta Services	22 Very Positive mention(s)	5 Positive mention(s)	2 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive
AECOM	8 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	3 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive

Quanta Services has a net margin of 4.03% compared to AECOM's net margin of 1.87%. Quanta Services' return on equity of 20.55% beat AECOM's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Quanta Services	4.03%	20.55%	7.34%
AECOM	1.87%	19.72%	4.10%

Summary

Quanta Services beats AECOM on 18 of the 20 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Quanta Services compare to EMCOR Group?

Quanta Services (NYSE:PWR) and EMCOR Group (NYSE:EME) are both large-cap industrials companies, but which is the superior investment? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their dividends, valuation, media sentiment, earnings, analyst recommendations, institutional ownership, profitability and risk.

90.5% of Quanta Services shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 92.6% of EMCOR Group shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.6% of Quanta Services shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 0.7% of EMCOR Group shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Quanta Services currently has a consensus target price of $769.25, suggesting a potential upside of 23.32%. EMCOR Group has a consensus target price of $965.86, suggesting a potential upside of 28.11%. Given EMCOR Group's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe EMCOR Group is more favorable than Quanta Services.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Quanta Services	3 Sell rating(s)	8 Hold rating(s)	20 Buy rating(s)	1 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.59
EMCOR Group	0 Sell rating(s)	1 Hold rating(s)	8 Buy rating(s)	1 Strong Buy rating(s)	3.00

Quanta Services pays an annual dividend of $0.44 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.1%. EMCOR Group pays an annual dividend of $1.60 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.2%. Quanta Services pays out 5.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. EMCOR Group pays out 5.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Quanta Services has raised its dividend for 6 consecutive years and EMCOR Group has raised its dividend for 5 consecutive years. EMCOR Group is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

EMCOR Group has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Quanta Services. EMCOR Group is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Quanta Services, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Quanta Services	$28.48B	3.29	$1.03B	$8.73	71.45
EMCOR Group	$16.99B	1.96	$1.27B	$32.15	23.45

Quanta Services has a beta of 1.2, suggesting that its share price is 20% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, EMCOR Group has a beta of 1.13, suggesting that its share price is 13% more volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, Quanta Services had 18 more articles in the media than EMCOR Group. MarketBeat recorded 30 mentions for Quanta Services and 12 mentions for EMCOR Group. EMCOR Group's average media sentiment score of 1.49 beat Quanta Services' score of 1.23 indicating that EMCOR Group is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Quanta Services	22 Very Positive mention(s)	5 Positive mention(s)	2 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive
EMCOR Group	12 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	0 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive

EMCOR Group has a net margin of 7.74% compared to Quanta Services' net margin of 4.03%. EMCOR Group's return on equity of 35.49% beat Quanta Services' return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Quanta Services	4.03%	20.55%	7.34%
EMCOR Group	7.74%	35.49%	14.12%

Summary

EMCOR Group beats Quanta Services on 12 of the 19 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Quanta Services compare to Eaton?

Eaton (NYSE:ETN) and Quanta Services (NYSE:PWR) are both large-cap industrials companies, but which is the better stock? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their media sentiment, analyst recommendations, profitability, earnings, risk, institutional ownership, dividends and valuation.

Eaton has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Quanta Services. Eaton is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Quanta Services, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Eaton	$27.45B	5.82	$4.09B	$9.83	41.82
Quanta Services	$28.48B	3.29	$1.03B	$8.73	71.45

Eaton currently has a consensus price target of $442.00, indicating a potential upside of 7.52%. Quanta Services has a consensus price target of $769.25, indicating a potential upside of 23.32%. Given Quanta Services' higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Quanta Services is more favorable than Eaton.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Eaton	0 Sell rating(s)	3 Hold rating(s)	14 Buy rating(s)	3 Strong Buy rating(s)	3.00
Quanta Services	3 Sell rating(s)	8 Hold rating(s)	20 Buy rating(s)	1 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.59

Eaton pays an annual dividend of $4.40 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.1%. Quanta Services pays an annual dividend of $0.44 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.1%. Eaton pays out 44.8% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Quanta Services pays out 5.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Quanta Services has increased its dividend for 6 consecutive years.

Eaton has a beta of 1.17, indicating that its share price is 17% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Quanta Services has a beta of 1.2, indicating that its share price is 20% more volatile than the broader market.

83.0% of Eaton shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 90.5% of Quanta Services shares are held by institutional investors. 0.1% of Eaton shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 0.6% of Quanta Services shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

In the previous week, Eaton had 20 more articles in the media than Quanta Services. MarketBeat recorded 50 mentions for Eaton and 30 mentions for Quanta Services. Quanta Services' average media sentiment score of 1.23 beat Eaton's score of 0.92 indicating that Quanta Services is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Eaton	23 Very Positive mention(s)	3 Positive mention(s)	11 Neutral mention(s)	1 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive
Quanta Services	22 Very Positive mention(s)	5 Positive mention(s)	2 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive

Eaton has a net margin of 12.75% compared to Quanta Services' net margin of 4.03%. Eaton's return on equity of 24.58% beat Quanta Services' return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Eaton	12.75%	24.58%	9.98%
Quanta Services	4.03%	20.55%	7.34%

Summary

Eaton and Quanta Services tied by winning 10 of the 20 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Quanta Services compare to Comfort Systems USA?

Quanta Services (NYSE:PWR) and Comfort Systems USA (NYSE:FIX) are both large-cap industrials companies, but which is the superior business? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their risk, valuation, media sentiment, analyst recommendations, dividends, earnings, institutional ownership and profitability.

Quanta Services pays an annual dividend of $0.44 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.1%. Comfort Systems USA pays an annual dividend of $3.60 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.2%. Quanta Services pays out 5.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Comfort Systems USA pays out 8.9% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Quanta Services has increased its dividend for 6 consecutive years and Comfort Systems USA has increased its dividend for 13 consecutive years. Comfort Systems USA is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

In the previous week, Quanta Services had 11 more articles in the media than Comfort Systems USA. MarketBeat recorded 30 mentions for Quanta Services and 19 mentions for Comfort Systems USA. Comfort Systems USA's average media sentiment score of 1.41 beat Quanta Services' score of 1.23 indicating that Comfort Systems USA is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Quanta Services	22 Very Positive mention(s)	5 Positive mention(s)	2 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive
Comfort Systems USA	17 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	0 Neutral mention(s)	1 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive

Quanta Services has higher revenue and earnings than Comfort Systems USA. Comfort Systems USA is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Quanta Services, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Quanta Services	$28.48B	3.29	$1.03B	$8.73	71.45
Comfort Systems USA	$9.10B	6.23	$1.02B	$40.66	39.64

Comfort Systems USA has a net margin of 12.77% compared to Quanta Services' net margin of 4.03%. Comfort Systems USA's return on equity of 53.55% beat Quanta Services' return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Quanta Services	4.03%	20.55%	7.34%
Comfort Systems USA	12.77%	53.55%	20.75%

90.5% of Quanta Services shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 96.5% of Comfort Systems USA shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.6% of Quanta Services shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 1.2% of Comfort Systems USA shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Quanta Services has a beta of 1.2, meaning that its share price is 20% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Comfort Systems USA has a beta of 1.67, meaning that its share price is 67% more volatile than the broader market.

Quanta Services presently has a consensus price target of $769.25, indicating a potential upside of 23.32%. Comfort Systems USA has a consensus price target of $2,082.86, indicating a potential upside of 29.22%. Given Comfort Systems USA's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Comfort Systems USA is more favorable than Quanta Services.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Quanta Services	3 Sell rating(s)	8 Hold rating(s)	20 Buy rating(s)	1 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.59
Comfort Systems USA	0 Sell rating(s)	1 Hold rating(s)	9 Buy rating(s)	1 Strong Buy rating(s)	3.00

Summary

Comfort Systems USA beats Quanta Services on 13 of the 19 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Quanta Services News Delivered to You Automatically

Subscribe Now

SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding PWR and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of NYSE and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.

PWR vs. The Competition

Export

Metric	Quanta Services	Construction & Engineering Industry	Industrials Sector	NYSE Exchange
Market Cap	$93.78B	$8.13B	$10.46B	$23.59B
Dividend Yield	0.07%	2.61%	97.04%	3.73%
P/E Ratio	71.45	21.98	25.99	29.33
Price / Sales	3.29	58.77	387.71	19.82
Price / Cash	38.91	17.20	24.20	19.95
Price / Book	10.30	4.51	4.99	4.83
Net Income	$1.03B	$487.40M	$612.25M	$1.07B
7 Day Performance	2.80%	-0.26%	-0.22%	0.43%
1 Month Performance	-7.12%	-5.49%	-2.16%	-0.78%
1 Year Performance	67.44%	33.95%	9.71%	12.82%

Quanta Services Competitors List

Export

Company	MarketRank	Share Price	Analysts' Price Target	1Y Price Performance	Market Cap	Revenue	P/E Ratio	Employee Count	Indicator(s)
PWR Quanta Services	4.8029 of 5 stars	$623.80 -0.1%	$769.25 +23.3%	+67.4%	$93.78B	$28.48B	71.45	69,500	News Coverage Positive News Dividend Announcement
MYRG MYR Group	4.448 of 5 stars	$291.42 -1.0%	$451.20 +54.8%	+59.3%	$4.54B	$4.01B	27.65	9,000	Positive News
ACM AECOM	4.9863 of 5 stars	$67.47 -2.5%	$89.58 +32.8%	-47.5%	$8.68B	$16.14B	30.95	51,000	Positive News High Trading Volume
EME EMCOR Group	4.9677 of 5 stars	$734.73 -0.7%	$965.86 +31.5%	+20.6%	$32.41B	$18.60B	22.85	44,000	Positive News
ETN Eaton	4.5664 of 5 stars	$402.69 0.0%	$442.00 +9.8%	+17.8%	$156.40B	$27.45B	40.97	97,000	Gap Down

Related Companies and Tools

Related Companies

Top 10 Stock Comparisons

This page (NYSE:PWR) was last updated on 9/7/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.

From Our Partners

Unlock superior investment research and tools.

Get MarketBeat All Access

In-depth profiles and analysis for 20,000 public companies.
Real-time analyst ratings, insider transactions, earnings data, and more.
Our daily ratings and market update email newsletter.

Sign In
Create Account

Your Email Address:

Your Password:

Forgot your password?

Your Email Address:

Choose a Password:

By creating a free account, you agree to our terms of service. This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

Quanta Services (PWR) Competitors

PWR vs. MYRG, ACM, EME, ETN, and FIX

How does Quanta Services compare to MYR Group?

Summary

How does Quanta Services compare to AECOM?

Summary

How does Quanta Services compare to EMCOR Group?

Summary

How does Quanta Services compare to Eaton?

Summary

How does Quanta Services compare to Comfort Systems USA?

Summary

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

Media Sentiment Over Time

PWR vs. The Competition

Quanta Services Competitors List

Related Companies and Tools

Best-in-Class Portfolio Monitoring

Stock Ideas and Recommendations

Advanced Stock Screeners and Research Tools

About MarketBeat

MarketBeat Products

Popular Tools

Financial Calendars

Terms & Info

Quanta Services (PWR) Competitors

PWR vs. MYRG, ACM, EME, ETN, and FIX

How does Quanta Services compare to MYR Group?

Is PWR or MYRG more profitable?

Which has more risk & volatility, PWR or MYRG?

Does the media refer more to PWR or MYRG?

Do institutionals and insiders hold more shares of PWR or MYRG?

Do analysts recommend PWR or MYRG?

Which has better valuation and earnings, PWR or MYRG?

Summary

How does Quanta Services compare to AECOM?

Is PWR or ACM a better dividend stock?

Which has more volatility and risk, PWR or ACM?

Do analysts recommend PWR or ACM?

Which has better earnings and valuation, PWR or ACM?

Do institutionals and insiders believe in PWR or ACM?

Does the media refer more to PWR or ACM?

Is PWR or ACM more profitable?

Summary

How does Quanta Services compare to EMCOR Group?

Do institutionals and insiders hold more shares of PWR or EME?

Do analysts rate PWR or EME?

Is PWR or EME a better dividend stock?

Which has higher earnings and valuation, PWR or EME?

Which has more volatility and risk, PWR or EME?

Does the media prefer PWR or EME?

Is PWR or EME more profitable?

Summary

How does Quanta Services compare to Eaton?

Which has higher valuation and earnings, ETN or PWR?

Do analysts rate ETN or PWR?

Is ETN or PWR a better dividend stock?

Which has more volatility & risk, ETN or PWR?

Do institutionals & insiders have more ownership in ETN or PWR?

Does the media favor ETN or PWR?

Is ETN or PWR more profitable?

Summary

How does Quanta Services compare to Comfort Systems USA?

Is PWR or FIX a better dividend stock?

Does the media prefer PWR or FIX?

Which has stronger earnings & valuation, PWR or FIX?

Is PWR or FIX more profitable?

Do insiders and institutionals have more ownership in PWR or FIX?

Which has more volatility and risk, PWR or FIX?

Do analysts prefer PWR or FIX?

Summary

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

Media Sentiment Over Time

PWR vs. The Competition

Quanta Services Competitors List

Related Companies and Tools

MarketBeat All Access Features

Best-in-Class Portfolio Monitoring

Stock Ideas and Recommendations

Advanced Stock Screeners and Research Tools