Free Trial

Quanta Services (PWR) Competitors

Quanta Services logo
$714.32 -15.78 (-2.16%)
As of 03:26 PM Eastern
This is a fair market value price provided by Massive. Learn more.

PWR vs. MYRG, ACM, EME, ETN, and FIX

Should you buy Quanta Services stock or one of its competitors? MarketBeat compares Quanta Services with other companies and stocks that may be similar based on industry, sector, market capitalization, business model, investor interest, or shared news coverage. Companies and stocks commonly compared with Quanta Services include MYR Group (MYRG), AECOM (ACM), EMCOR Group (EME), Eaton (ETN), and Comfort Systems USA (FIX).

How does Quanta Services compare to MYR Group?

MYR Group (NASDAQ:MYRG) and Quanta Services (NYSE:PWR) are both construction & engineering companies, but which is the superior stock? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their risk, institutional ownership, media sentiment, earnings, dividends, analyst recommendations, valuation and profitability.

In the previous week, Quanta Services had 12 more articles in the media than MYR Group. MarketBeat recorded 20 mentions for Quanta Services and 8 mentions for MYR Group. Quanta Services' average media sentiment score of 1.03 beat MYR Group's score of 0.75 indicating that Quanta Services is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
MYR Group
3 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
3 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
Quanta Services
14 Very Positive mention(s)
3 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

MYR Group has a beta of 1.3, suggesting that its share price is 30% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Quanta Services has a beta of 1.24, suggesting that its share price is 24% more volatile than the broader market.

MYR Group currently has a consensus price target of $358.17, suggesting a potential downside of 23.28%. Quanta Services has a consensus price target of $733.87, suggesting a potential upside of 2.74%. Given Quanta Services' higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Quanta Services is more favorable than MYR Group.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
MYR Group
0 Sell rating(s)
3 Hold rating(s)
3 Buy rating(s)
2 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.88
Quanta Services
0 Sell rating(s)
7 Hold rating(s)
19 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.78

Quanta Services has higher revenue and earnings than MYR Group. MYR Group is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Quanta Services, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
MYR Group$3.66B1.99$118.42M$9.0751.47
Quanta Services$28.48B3.76$1.03B$7.2997.99

88.9% of MYR Group shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 90.5% of Quanta Services shares are held by institutional investors. 1.9% of MYR Group shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 0.6% of Quanta Services shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

MYR Group has a net margin of 3.71% compared to Quanta Services' net margin of 3.67%. MYR Group's return on equity of 22.14% beat Quanta Services' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
MYR Group3.71% 22.14% 8.67%
Quanta Services 3.67%18.64%6.88%

Summary

Quanta Services beats MYR Group on 9 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Quanta Services compare to AECOM?

Quanta Services (NYSE:PWR) and AECOM (NYSE:ACM) are both construction companies, but which is the superior investment? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their institutional ownership, dividends, media sentiment, risk, earnings, profitability, analyst recommendations and valuation.

90.5% of Quanta Services shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 85.4% of AECOM shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.6% of Quanta Services shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.5% of AECOM shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Quanta Services pays an annual dividend of $0.44 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.1%. AECOM pays an annual dividend of $1.24 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.7%. Quanta Services pays out 6.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. AECOM pays out 32.4% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Quanta Services has raised its dividend for 6 consecutive years and AECOM has raised its dividend for 3 consecutive years.

Quanta Services has a beta of 1.24, suggesting that its share price is 24% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, AECOM has a beta of 1, suggesting that its share price has a similar volatility profile to the broader market.

Quanta Services has a net margin of 3.67% compared to AECOM's net margin of 3.16%. AECOM's return on equity of 28.52% beat Quanta Services' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Quanta Services3.67% 18.64% 6.88%
AECOM 3.16%28.52%6.08%

In the previous week, Quanta Services had 7 more articles in the media than AECOM. MarketBeat recorded 20 mentions for Quanta Services and 13 mentions for AECOM. Quanta Services' average media sentiment score of 1.03 beat AECOM's score of 0.46 indicating that Quanta Services is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Quanta Services
14 Very Positive mention(s)
3 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
AECOM
6 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
5 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
2 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral

Quanta Services has higher revenue and earnings than AECOM. AECOM is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Quanta Services, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Quanta Services$28.48B3.76$1.03B$7.2997.99
AECOM$16.14B0.56$561.77M$3.8318.50

Quanta Services presently has a consensus price target of $733.87, suggesting a potential upside of 2.74%. AECOM has a consensus price target of $116.00, suggesting a potential upside of 63.69%. Given AECOM's higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe AECOM is more favorable than Quanta Services.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Quanta Services
0 Sell rating(s)
7 Hold rating(s)
19 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.78
AECOM
0 Sell rating(s)
4 Hold rating(s)
9 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.69

Summary

Quanta Services beats AECOM on 17 of the 20 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Quanta Services compare to EMCOR Group?

Quanta Services (NYSE:PWR) and EMCOR Group (NYSE:EME) are both large-cap construction companies, but which is the better business? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their risk, institutional ownership, earnings, media sentiment, dividends, valuation, analyst recommendations and profitability.

Quanta Services pays an annual dividend of $0.44 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.1%. EMCOR Group pays an annual dividend of $1.60 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.2%. Quanta Services pays out 6.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. EMCOR Group pays out 5.4% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Quanta Services has increased its dividend for 6 consecutive years and EMCOR Group has increased its dividend for 5 consecutive years. EMCOR Group is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

90.5% of Quanta Services shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 92.6% of EMCOR Group shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.6% of Quanta Services shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 0.8% of EMCOR Group shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

EMCOR Group has a net margin of 7.54% compared to Quanta Services' net margin of 3.67%. EMCOR Group's return on equity of 35.19% beat Quanta Services' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Quanta Services3.67% 18.64% 6.88%
EMCOR Group 7.54%35.19%13.68%

In the previous week, EMCOR Group had 1 more articles in the media than Quanta Services. MarketBeat recorded 21 mentions for EMCOR Group and 20 mentions for Quanta Services. EMCOR Group's average media sentiment score of 1.15 beat Quanta Services' score of 1.03 indicating that EMCOR Group is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Quanta Services
14 Very Positive mention(s)
3 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
EMCOR Group
18 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
1 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

EMCOR Group has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Quanta Services. EMCOR Group is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Quanta Services, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Quanta Services$28.48B3.76$1.03B$7.2997.99
EMCOR Group$16.99B2.16$1.27B$29.8127.75

Quanta Services presently has a consensus target price of $733.87, suggesting a potential upside of 2.74%. EMCOR Group has a consensus target price of $836.88, suggesting a potential upside of 1.17%. Given Quanta Services' stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, equities research analysts clearly believe Quanta Services is more favorable than EMCOR Group.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Quanta Services
0 Sell rating(s)
7 Hold rating(s)
19 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.78
EMCOR Group
0 Sell rating(s)
4 Hold rating(s)
10 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.71

Quanta Services has a beta of 1.24, suggesting that its share price is 24% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, EMCOR Group has a beta of 1.17, suggesting that its share price is 17% more volatile than the broader market.

Summary

EMCOR Group beats Quanta Services on 11 of the 20 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Quanta Services compare to Eaton?

Quanta Services (NYSE:PWR) and Eaton (NYSE:ETN) are related large-cap companies, but which is the better stock? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their risk, analyst recommendations, dividends, institutional ownership, earnings, media sentiment, valuation and profitability.

Quanta Services has a beta of 1.24, meaning that its share price is 24% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Eaton has a beta of 1.24, meaning that its share price is 24% more volatile than the broader market.

Quanta Services pays an annual dividend of $0.44 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.1%. Eaton pays an annual dividend of $4.40 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.1%. Quanta Services pays out 6.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Eaton pays out 43.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Quanta Services has increased its dividend for 6 consecutive years.

Eaton has a net margin of 13.99% compared to Quanta Services' net margin of 3.67%. Eaton's return on equity of 24.72% beat Quanta Services' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Quanta Services3.67% 18.64% 6.88%
Eaton 13.99%24.72%10.69%

90.5% of Quanta Services shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 83.0% of Eaton shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.6% of Quanta Services shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 0.1% of Eaton shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

In the previous week, Quanta Services had 7 more articles in the media than Eaton. MarketBeat recorded 20 mentions for Quanta Services and 13 mentions for Eaton. Quanta Services' average media sentiment score of 1.03 beat Eaton's score of 0.94 indicating that Quanta Services is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Quanta Services
14 Very Positive mention(s)
3 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
Eaton
9 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
1 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

Eaton has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Quanta Services. Eaton is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Quanta Services, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Quanta Services$28.48B3.76$1.03B$7.2997.99
Eaton$27.45B5.67$4.09B$10.2339.21

Quanta Services presently has a consensus target price of $733.87, indicating a potential upside of 2.74%. Eaton has a consensus target price of $420.95, indicating a potential upside of 4.94%. Given Eaton's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Eaton is more favorable than Quanta Services.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Quanta Services
0 Sell rating(s)
7 Hold rating(s)
19 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.78
Eaton
0 Sell rating(s)
4 Hold rating(s)
15 Buy rating(s)
2 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.90

Summary

Eaton beats Quanta Services on 10 of the 19 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Quanta Services compare to Comfort Systems USA?

Quanta Services (NYSE:PWR) and Comfort Systems USA (NYSE:FIX) are both large-cap construction companies, but which is the better business? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their profitability, institutional ownership, analyst recommendations, risk, media sentiment, dividends, earnings and valuation.

90.5% of Quanta Services shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 96.5% of Comfort Systems USA shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.6% of Quanta Services shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 1.2% of Comfort Systems USA shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Quanta Services currently has a consensus target price of $733.87, suggesting a potential upside of 2.74%. Comfort Systems USA has a consensus target price of $1,969.33, suggesting a potential upside of 8.41%. Given Comfort Systems USA's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Comfort Systems USA is more favorable than Quanta Services.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Quanta Services
0 Sell rating(s)
7 Hold rating(s)
19 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.78
Comfort Systems USA
0 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
8 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00

Quanta Services pays an annual dividend of $0.44 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.1%. Comfort Systems USA pays an annual dividend of $3.20 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.2%. Quanta Services pays out 6.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Comfort Systems USA pays out 9.2% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Quanta Services has raised its dividend for 6 consecutive years and Comfort Systems USA has raised its dividend for 13 consecutive years. Comfort Systems USA is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

In the previous week, Comfort Systems USA had 4 more articles in the media than Quanta Services. MarketBeat recorded 24 mentions for Comfort Systems USA and 20 mentions for Quanta Services. Comfort Systems USA's average media sentiment score of 1.45 beat Quanta Services' score of 1.03 indicating that Comfort Systems USA is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Quanta Services
14 Very Positive mention(s)
3 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
Comfort Systems USA
19 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
2 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

Comfort Systems USA has a net margin of 12.07% compared to Quanta Services' net margin of 3.67%. Comfort Systems USA's return on equity of 51.69% beat Quanta Services' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Quanta Services3.67% 18.64% 6.88%
Comfort Systems USA 12.07%51.69%20.21%

Quanta Services has a beta of 1.24, suggesting that its share price is 24% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Comfort Systems USA has a beta of 1.7, suggesting that its share price is 70% more volatile than the broader market.

Quanta Services has higher revenue and earnings than Comfort Systems USA. Comfort Systems USA is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Quanta Services, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Quanta Services$28.48B3.76$1.03B$7.2997.99
Comfort Systems USA$9.10B7.03$1.02B$34.6652.41

Summary

Comfort Systems USA beats Quanta Services on 14 of the 19 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Quanta Services News Delivered to You Automatically

Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for PWR and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.

Subscribe Now
SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding PWR and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.
Skip Chart

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of NYSE and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Skip Chart

PWR vs. The Competition

MetricQuanta ServicesENGINRG/R&D SVS IndustryConstruction SectorNYSE Exchange
Market Cap$107.04B$10.31B$9.66B$23.15B
Dividend Yield0.06%1.34%1.80%4.07%
P/E Ratio97.8523.8418.2930.82
Price / Sales3.761.983.9824.36
Price / Cash45.7124.0417.4324.96
Price / Book11.724.717.744.79
Net Income$1.03B$224.31M$560.50M$1.07B
7 Day Performance-1.15%0.98%1.81%1.19%
1 Month Performance13.76%7.92%2.84%2.89%
1 Year Performance110.22%30.56%14.61%27.15%

Quanta Services Competitors List

CompanyMarketRankShare PriceAnalysts' Price Target1Y Price PerformanceMarket CapRevenueP/E RatioEmployee CountIndicator(s)
PWR
Quanta Services
4.3919 of 5 stars
$714.32
-2.2%
$733.87
+2.7%
+114.8%$107.04B$28.48B97.8569,500
MYRG
MYR Group
2.2367 of 5 stars
$446.90
flat
$328.86
-26.4%
+201.1%$6.96B$3.82B49.279,000
ACM
AECOM
4.9251 of 5 stars
$71.98
-0.1%
$116.00
+61.2%
-34.4%$9.25B$16.14B18.7951,000
EME
EMCOR Group
3.9453 of 5 stars
$848.33
-0.1%
$799.29
-5.8%
+80.9%$37.70B$17.75B28.4644,000
ETN
Eaton
4.516 of 5 stars
$391.73
+0.1%
$420.95
+7.5%
+23.4%$152.11B$27.45B38.2997,000

Related Companies and Tools


This page (NYSE:PWR) was last updated on 5/29/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.
From Our Partners