Free Trial

Quanta Services (PWR) Competitors

Quanta Services logo
$610.36 +27.22 (+4.67%)
As of 03:47 PM Eastern
This is a fair market value price provided by Massive. Learn more.

PWR vs. ACM, DY, EME, FIX, and FLR

Should you buy Quanta Services stock or one of its competitors? Quanta Services's main competitors and comparable companies include AECOM (ACM), Dycom Industries (DY), EMCOR Group (EME), Comfort Systems USA (FIX), and Fluor (FLR). Companies are selected based on similarities in market, industry, and size. These companies are all part of the "construction & engineering" industry.

How does Quanta Services compare to AECOM?

Quanta Services (NYSE:PWR) and AECOM (NYSE:ACM) are both industrials companies, but which is the superior stock? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their media sentiment, valuation, analyst recommendations, earnings, risk, institutional ownership, profitability and dividends.

Quanta Services has a net margin of 4.51% compared to AECOM's net margin of 1.87%. Quanta Services' return on equity of 23.56% beat AECOM's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Quanta Services4.51% 23.56% 8.13%
AECOM 1.87%19.72%4.10%

Quanta Services pays an annual dividend of $0.44 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.1%. AECOM pays an annual dividend of $1.24 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.8%. Quanta Services pays out 4.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. AECOM pays out 56.9% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Quanta Services has raised its dividend for 6 consecutive years and AECOM has raised its dividend for 3 consecutive years.

Quanta Services currently has a consensus target price of $763.31, indicating a potential upside of 30.78%. AECOM has a consensus target price of $80.73, indicating a potential upside of 14.22%. Given Quanta Services' stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, research analysts plainly believe Quanta Services is more favorable than AECOM.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Quanta Services
3 Sell rating(s)
6 Hold rating(s)
23 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.67
AECOM
1 Sell rating(s)
3 Hold rating(s)
8 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.58

Quanta Services has a beta of 1.29, suggesting that its share price is 29% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, AECOM has a beta of 0.9, suggesting that its share price is 10% less volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, Quanta Services had 28 more articles in the media than AECOM. MarketBeat recorded 32 mentions for Quanta Services and 4 mentions for AECOM. Quanta Services' average media sentiment score of 0.91 beat AECOM's score of 0.65 indicating that Quanta Services is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Quanta Services
20 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
6 Neutral mention(s)
3 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
AECOM
3 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

90.5% of Quanta Services shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 85.4% of AECOM shares are held by institutional investors. 0.6% of Quanta Services shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 0.5% of AECOM shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Quanta Services has higher revenue and earnings than AECOM. AECOM is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Quanta Services, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Quanta Services$28.48B3.09$1.03B$11.0452.87
AECOM$16.14B0.56$561.77M$2.1832.42

Summary

Quanta Services beats AECOM on 19 of the 20 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Quanta Services compare to Dycom Industries?

Quanta Services (NYSE:PWR) and Dycom Industries (NYSE:DY) are both industrials companies, but which is the superior stock? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their profitability, valuation, dividends, earnings, institutional ownership, analyst recommendations, media sentiment and risk.

90.5% of Quanta Services shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 98.3% of Dycom Industries shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.6% of Quanta Services shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 1.2% of Dycom Industries shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Dycom Industries has a net margin of 4.79% compared to Quanta Services' net margin of 4.51%. Dycom Industries' return on equity of 25.30% beat Quanta Services' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Quanta Services4.51% 23.56% 8.13%
Dycom Industries 4.79%25.30%8.39%

Quanta Services has a beta of 1.29, suggesting that its share price is 29% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Dycom Industries has a beta of 1.53, suggesting that its share price is 53% more volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, Quanta Services had 29 more articles in the media than Dycom Industries. MarketBeat recorded 32 mentions for Quanta Services and 3 mentions for Dycom Industries. Quanta Services' average media sentiment score of 0.91 beat Dycom Industries' score of 0.40 indicating that Quanta Services is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Quanta Services
20 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
6 Neutral mention(s)
3 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
Dycom Industries
1 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
1 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral

Quanta Services has higher revenue and earnings than Dycom Industries. Dycom Industries is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Quanta Services, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Quanta Services$28.48B3.09$1.03B$11.0452.87
Dycom Industries$5.55B1.19$281.19M$10.9919.86

Quanta Services currently has a consensus target price of $763.31, indicating a potential upside of 30.78%. Dycom Industries has a consensus target price of $502.92, indicating a potential upside of 130.44%. Given Dycom Industries' stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Dycom Industries is more favorable than Quanta Services.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Quanta Services
3 Sell rating(s)
6 Hold rating(s)
23 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.67
Dycom Industries
0 Sell rating(s)
3 Hold rating(s)
10 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.77

Summary

Quanta Services beats Dycom Industries on 9 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Quanta Services compare to EMCOR Group?

EMCOR Group (NYSE:EME) and Quanta Services (NYSE:PWR) are both large-cap industrials companies, but which is the superior investment? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their risk, profitability, institutional ownership, earnings, valuation, media sentiment, dividends and analyst recommendations.

92.6% of EMCOR Group shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 90.5% of Quanta Services shares are held by institutional investors. 0.7% of EMCOR Group shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.6% of Quanta Services shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

EMCOR Group has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Quanta Services. EMCOR Group is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Quanta Services, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
EMCOR Group$16.99B1.66$1.27B$34.6218.61
Quanta Services$28.48B3.09$1.03B$11.0452.87

EMCOR Group has a net margin of 7.78% compared to Quanta Services' net margin of 4.51%. EMCOR Group's return on equity of 36.65% beat Quanta Services' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
EMCOR Group7.78% 36.65% 14.50%
Quanta Services 4.51%23.56%8.13%

EMCOR Group currently has a consensus target price of $902.88, suggesting a potential upside of 40.12%. Quanta Services has a consensus target price of $763.31, suggesting a potential upside of 30.78%. Given EMCOR Group's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, equities analysts clearly believe EMCOR Group is more favorable than Quanta Services.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
EMCOR Group
0 Sell rating(s)
3 Hold rating(s)
7 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.70
Quanta Services
3 Sell rating(s)
6 Hold rating(s)
23 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.67

EMCOR Group pays an annual dividend of $1.60 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.2%. Quanta Services pays an annual dividend of $0.44 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.1%. EMCOR Group pays out 4.6% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Quanta Services pays out 4.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. EMCOR Group has increased its dividend for 5 consecutive years and Quanta Services has increased its dividend for 6 consecutive years.

EMCOR Group has a beta of 1.16, suggesting that its stock price is 16% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Quanta Services has a beta of 1.29, suggesting that its stock price is 29% more volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, Quanta Services had 19 more articles in the media than EMCOR Group. MarketBeat recorded 32 mentions for Quanta Services and 13 mentions for EMCOR Group. Quanta Services' average media sentiment score of 0.91 beat EMCOR Group's score of 0.45 indicating that Quanta Services is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
EMCOR Group
3 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
4 Neutral mention(s)
3 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral
Quanta Services
20 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
6 Neutral mention(s)
3 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

Summary

EMCOR Group and Quanta Services tied by winning 10 of the 20 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Quanta Services compare to Comfort Systems USA?

Quanta Services (NYSE:PWR) and Comfort Systems USA (NYSE:FIX) are both large-cap industrials companies, but which is the better stock? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their media sentiment, institutional ownership, analyst recommendations, valuation, profitability, earnings, dividends and risk.

90.5% of Quanta Services shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 96.5% of Comfort Systems USA shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.6% of Quanta Services shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 1.2% of Comfort Systems USA shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Quanta Services presently has a consensus price target of $763.31, indicating a potential upside of 30.78%. Comfort Systems USA has a consensus price target of $1,889.13, indicating a potential upside of 71.04%. Given Comfort Systems USA's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Comfort Systems USA is more favorable than Quanta Services.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Quanta Services
3 Sell rating(s)
6 Hold rating(s)
23 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.67
Comfort Systems USA
0 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
9 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00

Quanta Services pays an annual dividend of $0.44 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.1%. Comfort Systems USA pays an annual dividend of $3.60 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.3%. Quanta Services pays out 4.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Comfort Systems USA pays out 7.8% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Quanta Services has increased its dividend for 6 consecutive years and Comfort Systems USA has increased its dividend for 13 consecutive years. Comfort Systems USA is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

Comfort Systems USA has a net margin of 13.01% compared to Quanta Services' net margin of 4.51%. Comfort Systems USA's return on equity of 55.24% beat Quanta Services' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Quanta Services4.51% 23.56% 8.13%
Comfort Systems USA 13.01%55.24%20.61%

Quanta Services has higher revenue and earnings than Comfort Systems USA. Comfort Systems USA is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Quanta Services, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Quanta Services$28.48B3.09$1.03B$11.0452.87
Comfort Systems USA$9.10B4.25$1.02B$46.3223.85

Quanta Services has a beta of 1.29, indicating that its share price is 29% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Comfort Systems USA has a beta of 1.64, indicating that its share price is 64% more volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, Quanta Services had 18 more articles in the media than Comfort Systems USA. MarketBeat recorded 32 mentions for Quanta Services and 14 mentions for Comfort Systems USA. Comfort Systems USA's average media sentiment score of 1.07 beat Quanta Services' score of 0.91 indicating that Comfort Systems USA is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Quanta Services
20 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
6 Neutral mention(s)
3 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
Comfort Systems USA
8 Very Positive mention(s)
2 Positive mention(s)
2 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

Summary

Comfort Systems USA beats Quanta Services on 13 of the 19 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Quanta Services compare to Fluor?

Fluor (NYSE:FLR) and Quanta Services (NYSE:PWR) are both industrials companies, but which is the superior stock? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their earnings, profitability, analyst recommendations, dividends, media sentiment, risk, valuation and institutional ownership.

Quanta Services has higher revenue and earnings than Fluor. Fluor is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Quanta Services, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Fluor$15.50B0.42-$51M-$6.82N/A
Quanta Services$28.48B3.09$1.03B$11.0452.87

In the previous week, Fluor had 7 more articles in the media than Quanta Services. MarketBeat recorded 39 mentions for Fluor and 32 mentions for Quanta Services. Quanta Services' average media sentiment score of 0.91 beat Fluor's score of 0.26 indicating that Quanta Services is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Fluor
7 Very Positive mention(s)
9 Positive mention(s)
12 Neutral mention(s)
5 Negative mention(s)
2 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral
Quanta Services
20 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
6 Neutral mention(s)
3 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

88.1% of Fluor shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 90.5% of Quanta Services shares are owned by institutional investors. 1.7% of Fluor shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 0.6% of Quanta Services shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Quanta Services has a net margin of 4.51% compared to Fluor's net margin of -7.19%. Quanta Services' return on equity of 23.56% beat Fluor's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Fluor-7.19% 10.52% 3.98%
Quanta Services 4.51%23.56%8.13%

Fluor currently has a consensus target price of $60.00, indicating a potential upside of 19.01%. Quanta Services has a consensus target price of $763.31, indicating a potential upside of 30.78%. Given Quanta Services' stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Quanta Services is more favorable than Fluor.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Fluor
1 Sell rating(s)
3 Hold rating(s)
4 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.38
Quanta Services
3 Sell rating(s)
6 Hold rating(s)
23 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.67

Fluor has a beta of 1.22, indicating that its stock price is 22% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Quanta Services has a beta of 1.29, indicating that its stock price is 29% more volatile than the broader market.

Summary

Quanta Services beats Fluor on 15 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Quanta Services News Delivered to You Automatically

Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for PWR and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.

Subscribe Now
SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding PWR and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.
Skip Chart

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of NYSE and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Skip Chart

PWR vs. The Competition

MetricQuanta ServicesConstruction & Engineering IndustryIndustrials SectorNYSE Exchange
Market Cap$91.90B$7.55B$10.21B$23.61B
Dividend Yield0.07%2.60%2.93%3.73%
P/E Ratio55.2433.5932.9230.41
Price / Sales3.231.763.273.40
Price / Cash36.8615.5820.2915.97
Price / Book8.664.433.893.76
Net Income$1.03B$492.93M$609.27M$1.08B
7 Day Performance5.13%-0.29%-0.17%-0.60%
1 Month Performance-13.44%-0.97%-1.79%1.08%
1 Year Performance35.89%8.71%2.56%6.72%

Quanta Services Competitors List

CompanyMarketRankShare PriceAnalysts' Price Target1Y Price PerformanceMarket CapRevenueP/E RatioEmployee CountIndicator(s)
PWR
Quanta Services
4.631 of 5 stars
$610.36
+4.7%
$763.31
+25.1%
+29.6%$91.90B$28.48B55.2469,500
ACM
AECOM
4.4436 of 5 stars
$65.54
+3.5%
$80.73
+23.2%
-45.9%$8.44B$16.14B30.0751,000
DY
Dycom Industries
4.9069 of 5 stars
$220.67
-3.1%
$502.92
+127.9%
-25.8%$6.66B$5.55B20.0819,556
EME
EMCOR Group
4.9666 of 5 stars
$680.20
+0.1%
$951.86
+39.9%
-1.8%$29.78B$16.99B19.6544,000
FIX
Comfort Systems USA
4.979 of 5 stars
$1,196.82
-2.9%
$1,916.14
+60.1%
+13.5%$41.88B$9.10B25.8422,700

Related Companies and Tools


This page (NYSE:PWR) was last updated on 11/11/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.
From Our Partners