Go Pro

Quanta Services (PWR) Competitors

Quanta Services logo
$649.72 +6.22 (+0.97%)
Closing price 09/25/2026 03:59 PM Eastern
Extended Trading
$650.78 +1.06 (+0.16%)
As of 09/25/2026 07:58 PM Eastern
Extended trading is trading that happens on electronic markets outside of regular trading hours. This is a fair market value extended hours price provided by Massive. Learn more.

PWR vs. MYRG, ACM, EME, ETN, and FIX

Should you buy Quanta Services stock or one of its competitors? Quanta Services's main competitors and comparable companies include MYR Group (MYRG), AECOM (ACM), EMCOR Group (EME), Eaton (ETN), and Comfort Systems USA (FIX). Companies are selected based on similarities in market, industry, and size. These companies are all part of the "industrials" sector.

How does Quanta Services compare to MYR Group?

MYR Group (NASDAQ:MYRG) and Quanta Services (NYSE:PWR) are both industrials companies, but which is the superior business? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their media sentiment, risk, institutional ownership, earnings, profitability, dividends, valuation and analyst recommendations.

MYR Group has a beta of 1.31, indicating that its share price is 31% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Quanta Services has a beta of 1.2, indicating that its share price is 20% more volatile than the broader market.

MYR Group has a net margin of 4.13% compared to Quanta Services' net margin of 4.03%. MYR Group's return on equity of 24.17% beat Quanta Services' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
MYR Group4.13% 24.17% 9.96%
Quanta Services 4.03%20.55%7.34%

MYR Group presently has a consensus target price of $451.20, suggesting a potential upside of 54.21%. Quanta Services has a consensus target price of $768.80, suggesting a potential upside of 18.33%. Given MYR Group's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, equities analysts plainly believe MYR Group is more favorable than Quanta Services.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
MYR Group
0 Sell rating(s)
4 Hold rating(s)
2 Buy rating(s)
2 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.75
Quanta Services
3 Sell rating(s)
6 Hold rating(s)
22 Buy rating(s)
2 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.70

Quanta Services has higher revenue and earnings than MYR Group. MYR Group is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Quanta Services, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
MYR Group$4.01B1.14$118.42M$10.5427.76
Quanta Services$32.91B2.97$1.03B$8.7374.42

88.9% of MYR Group shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 90.5% of Quanta Services shares are owned by institutional investors. 1.9% of MYR Group shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 0.6% of Quanta Services shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

In the previous week, Quanta Services had 7 more articles in the media than MYR Group. MarketBeat recorded 11 mentions for Quanta Services and 4 mentions for MYR Group. MYR Group's average media sentiment score of 1.10 beat Quanta Services' score of 0.89 indicating that MYR Group is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
MYR Group
3 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
Quanta Services
6 Very Positive mention(s)
3 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
2 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

Summary

MYR Group beats Quanta Services on 9 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Quanta Services compare to AECOM?

Quanta Services (NYSE:PWR) and AECOM (NYSE:ACM) are both industrials companies, but which is the better business? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their profitability, risk, institutional ownership, media sentiment, earnings, valuation, dividends and analyst recommendations.

In the previous week, Quanta Services had 5 more articles in the media than AECOM. MarketBeat recorded 11 mentions for Quanta Services and 6 mentions for AECOM. Quanta Services' average media sentiment score of 0.89 beat AECOM's score of 0.29 indicating that Quanta Services is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Quanta Services
6 Very Positive mention(s)
3 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
2 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
AECOM
3 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
2 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
1 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral

Quanta Services has higher revenue and earnings than AECOM. AECOM is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Quanta Services, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Quanta Services$32.91B2.97$1.03B$8.7374.42
AECOM$15.39B0.51$561.77M$2.1828.14

Quanta Services pays an annual dividend of $0.44 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.1%. AECOM pays an annual dividend of $1.24 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.0%. Quanta Services pays out 5.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. AECOM pays out 56.9% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Quanta Services has increased its dividend for 6 consecutive years and AECOM has increased its dividend for 3 consecutive years.

Quanta Services currently has a consensus price target of $768.80, suggesting a potential upside of 18.33%. AECOM has a consensus price target of $88.25, suggesting a potential upside of 43.87%. Given AECOM's higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe AECOM is more favorable than Quanta Services.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Quanta Services
3 Sell rating(s)
6 Hold rating(s)
22 Buy rating(s)
2 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.70
AECOM
2 Sell rating(s)
2 Hold rating(s)
9 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.54

Quanta Services has a net margin of 4.03% compared to AECOM's net margin of 1.87%. Quanta Services' return on equity of 20.55% beat AECOM's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Quanta Services4.03% 20.55% 7.34%
AECOM 1.87%19.72%4.10%

90.5% of Quanta Services shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 85.4% of AECOM shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.6% of Quanta Services shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.5% of AECOM shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Quanta Services has a beta of 1.2, suggesting that its stock price is 20% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, AECOM has a beta of 0.91, suggesting that its stock price is 9% less volatile than the broader market.

Summary

Quanta Services beats AECOM on 18 of the 20 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Quanta Services compare to EMCOR Group?

EMCOR Group (NYSE:EME) and Quanta Services (NYSE:PWR) are both large-cap industrials companies, but which is the better investment? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their dividends, media sentiment, valuation, profitability, earnings, risk, institutional ownership and analyst recommendations.

In the previous week, Quanta Services had 8 more articles in the media than EMCOR Group. MarketBeat recorded 11 mentions for Quanta Services and 3 mentions for EMCOR Group. Quanta Services' average media sentiment score of 0.89 beat EMCOR Group's score of 0.73 indicating that Quanta Services is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
EMCOR Group
1 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
2 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
Quanta Services
6 Very Positive mention(s)
3 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
2 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

92.6% of EMCOR Group shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 90.5% of Quanta Services shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.7% of EMCOR Group shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 0.6% of Quanta Services shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

EMCOR Group pays an annual dividend of $1.60 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.2%. Quanta Services pays an annual dividend of $0.44 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.1%. EMCOR Group pays out 5.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Quanta Services pays out 5.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. EMCOR Group has increased its dividend for 5 consecutive years and Quanta Services has increased its dividend for 6 consecutive years. EMCOR Group is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

EMCOR Group has a net margin of 7.74% compared to Quanta Services' net margin of 4.03%. EMCOR Group's return on equity of 35.49% beat Quanta Services' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
EMCOR Group7.74% 35.49% 14.12%
Quanta Services 4.03%20.55%7.34%

EMCOR Group has a beta of 1.13, suggesting that its share price is 13% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Quanta Services has a beta of 1.2, suggesting that its share price is 20% more volatile than the broader market.

EMCOR Group currently has a consensus target price of $965.86, indicating a potential upside of 26.80%. Quanta Services has a consensus target price of $768.80, indicating a potential upside of 18.33%. Given EMCOR Group's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, equities analysts clearly believe EMCOR Group is more favorable than Quanta Services.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
EMCOR Group
0 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
7 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00
Quanta Services
3 Sell rating(s)
6 Hold rating(s)
22 Buy rating(s)
2 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.70

EMCOR Group has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Quanta Services. EMCOR Group is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Quanta Services, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
EMCOR Group$18.60B1.81$1.27B$32.1523.69
Quanta Services$32.91B2.97$1.03B$8.7374.42

Summary

EMCOR Group beats Quanta Services on 11 of the 20 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Quanta Services compare to Eaton?

Quanta Services (NYSE:PWR) and Eaton (NYSE:ETN) are both large-cap industrials companies, but which is the better stock? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, valuation, institutional ownership, dividends, earnings, profitability, media sentiment and risk.

Eaton has a net margin of 12.75% compared to Quanta Services' net margin of 4.03%. Eaton's return on equity of 24.58% beat Quanta Services' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Quanta Services4.03% 20.55% 7.34%
Eaton 12.75%24.58%9.98%

Quanta Services has a beta of 1.2, indicating that its stock price is 20% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Eaton has a beta of 1.17, indicating that its stock price is 17% more volatile than the broader market.

Quanta Services pays an annual dividend of $0.44 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.1%. Eaton pays an annual dividend of $4.40 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.0%. Quanta Services pays out 5.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Eaton pays out 44.8% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Quanta Services has raised its dividend for 6 consecutive years.

90.5% of Quanta Services shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 83.0% of Eaton shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.6% of Quanta Services shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 0.1% of Eaton shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

In the previous week, Eaton had 22 more articles in the media than Quanta Services. MarketBeat recorded 33 mentions for Eaton and 11 mentions for Quanta Services. Eaton's average media sentiment score of 0.99 beat Quanta Services' score of 0.89 indicating that Eaton is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Quanta Services
6 Very Positive mention(s)
3 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
2 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
Eaton
19 Very Positive mention(s)
5 Positive mention(s)
2 Neutral mention(s)
2 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

Eaton has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Quanta Services. Eaton is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Quanta Services, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Quanta Services$32.91B2.97$1.03B$8.7374.42
Eaton$30.03B5.69$4.09B$9.8344.76

Quanta Services currently has a consensus target price of $768.80, suggesting a potential upside of 18.33%. Eaton has a consensus target price of $456.50, suggesting a potential upside of 3.75%. Given Quanta Services' higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Quanta Services is more favorable than Eaton.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Quanta Services
3 Sell rating(s)
6 Hold rating(s)
22 Buy rating(s)
2 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.70
Eaton
0 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
14 Buy rating(s)
3 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.11

Summary

Eaton beats Quanta Services on 11 of the 20 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Quanta Services compare to Comfort Systems USA?

Comfort Systems USA (NYSE:FIX) and Quanta Services (NYSE:PWR) are both large-cap industrials companies, but which is the superior stock? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their valuation, profitability, risk, earnings, institutional ownership, media sentiment, analyst recommendations and dividends.

Comfort Systems USA pays an annual dividend of $3.60 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.2%. Quanta Services pays an annual dividend of $0.44 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.1%. Comfort Systems USA pays out 8.9% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Quanta Services pays out 5.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Comfort Systems USA has raised its dividend for 13 consecutive years and Quanta Services has raised its dividend for 6 consecutive years. Comfort Systems USA is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

In the previous week, Quanta Services had 8 more articles in the media than Comfort Systems USA. MarketBeat recorded 11 mentions for Quanta Services and 3 mentions for Comfort Systems USA. Comfort Systems USA's average media sentiment score of 1.02 beat Quanta Services' score of 0.89 indicating that Comfort Systems USA is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Comfort Systems USA
2 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
Quanta Services
6 Very Positive mention(s)
3 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
2 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

96.5% of Comfort Systems USA shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 90.5% of Quanta Services shares are owned by institutional investors. 1.2% of Comfort Systems USA shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.6% of Quanta Services shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Quanta Services has higher revenue and earnings than Comfort Systems USA. Comfort Systems USA is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Quanta Services, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Comfort Systems USA$9.10B6.40$1.02B$40.6640.73
Quanta Services$32.91B2.97$1.03B$8.7374.42

Comfort Systems USA currently has a consensus price target of $2,082.86, indicating a potential upside of 25.76%. Quanta Services has a consensus price target of $768.80, indicating a potential upside of 18.33%. Given Comfort Systems USA's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, research analysts plainly believe Comfort Systems USA is more favorable than Quanta Services.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Comfort Systems USA
0 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
8 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00
Quanta Services
3 Sell rating(s)
6 Hold rating(s)
22 Buy rating(s)
2 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.70

Comfort Systems USA has a net margin of 12.77% compared to Quanta Services' net margin of 4.03%. Comfort Systems USA's return on equity of 53.55% beat Quanta Services' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Comfort Systems USA12.77% 53.55% 20.75%
Quanta Services 4.03%20.55%7.34%

Comfort Systems USA has a beta of 1.67, meaning that its share price is 67% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Quanta Services has a beta of 1.2, meaning that its share price is 20% more volatile than the broader market.

Summary

Comfort Systems USA beats Quanta Services on 13 of the 20 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Quanta Services News Delivered to You Automatically

Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for PWR and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.

Subscribe Now
SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding PWR and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.
Skip Chart

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of NYSE and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Skip Chart

PWR vs. The Competition

MetricQuanta ServicesConstruction & Engineering IndustryIndustrials SectorNYSE Exchange
Market Cap$97.59B$7.97B$10.21B$22.98B
Dividend Yield0.07%2.67%96.95%3.68%
P/E Ratio74.4221.2925.3228.00
Price / Sales2.9759.01363.4191.55
Price / Cash40.4516.7223.9941.27
Price / Book10.735.104.864.66
Net Income$1.03B$487.38M$614.63M$1.07B
7 Day Performance2.13%1.72%0.76%-1.12%
1 Month Performance4.38%-2.68%-2.77%-5.10%
1 Year Performance60.03%15.26%4.25%7.73%

Quanta Services Competitors List

CompanyMarketRankShare PriceAnalysts' Price Target1Y Price PerformanceMarket CapRevenueP/E RatioEmployee CountIndicator(s)
PWR
Quanta Services
4.4518 of 5 stars
$649.72
+1.0%
$768.80
+18.3%
+60.0%$97.59B$32.91B74.4269,500
MYRG
MYR Group
4.0649 of 5 stars
$288.45
+3.3%
$451.20
+56.4%
+47.3%$4.49B$4.01B27.379,000
ACM
AECOM
4.3252 of 5 stars
$62.89
+1.5%
$88.25
+40.3%
-52.5%$8.09B$15.39B28.8551,000
EME
EMCOR Group
4.7892 of 5 stars
$757.08
+0.9%
$965.86
+27.6%
+18.7%$33.39B$18.60B23.5544,000
ETN
Eaton
3.8183 of 5 stars
$434.93
+2.4%
$451.63
+3.8%
+20.3%$168.93B$30.03B44.2597,000

Related Companies and Tools


This page (NYSE:PWR) was last updated on 9/27/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.
From Our Partners