Which has stronger valuation and earnings, PWR or MYRG?

Quanta Services has higher revenue and earnings than MYR Group. MYR Group is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Quanta Services, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks. Company Gross Revenue Price/Sales Ratio Net Income Earnings Per Share Price/Earnings Ratio Quanta Services $28.48B 3.82 $1.03B $8.73 82.87 MYR Group $3.66B 1.45 $118.42M $10.54 32.33

Is PWR or MYRG more profitable?

MYR Group has a net margin of 4.13% compared to Quanta Services' net margin of 4.03%. MYR Group's return on equity of 24.17% beat Quanta Services' return on equity. Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets Quanta Services 4.03% 20.55% 7.34% MYR Group 4.13% 24.17% 9.96%

Does the media refer more to PWR or MYRG?

In the previous week, Quanta Services had 1 more articles in the media than MYR Group. MarketBeat recorded 10 mentions for Quanta Services and 9 mentions for MYR Group. MYR Group's average media sentiment score of 1.21 beat Quanta Services' score of 1.21 indicating that MYR Group is being referred to more favorably in the news media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment Quanta Services 8 Very Positive mention(s) 1 Positive mention(s) 1 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive MYR Group 4 Very Positive mention(s) 1 Positive mention(s) 2 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive

Which has preferable valuation and earnings, PWR or ACM?

Quanta Services has higher revenue and earnings than AECOM. AECOM is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Quanta Services, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks. Company Gross Revenue Price/Sales Ratio Net Income Earnings Per Share Price/Earnings Ratio Quanta Services $28.48B 3.82 $1.03B $8.73 82.87 AECOM $16.14B 0.50 $561.77M $2.18 28.52

Is PWR or ACM more profitable?

Quanta Services has a net margin of 4.03% compared to AECOM's net margin of 1.87%. Quanta Services' return on equity of 20.55% beat AECOM's return on equity. Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets Quanta Services 4.03% 20.55% 7.34% AECOM 1.87% 19.72% 4.10%

Does the media favor PWR or ACM?

In the previous week, AECOM had 25 more articles in the media than Quanta Services. MarketBeat recorded 35 mentions for AECOM and 10 mentions for Quanta Services. Quanta Services' average media sentiment score of 1.21 beat AECOM's score of 0.08 indicating that Quanta Services is being referred to more favorably in the media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment Quanta Services 8 Very Positive mention(s) 1 Positive mention(s) 1 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive AECOM 7 Very Positive mention(s) 5 Positive mention(s) 11 Neutral mention(s) 4 Negative mention(s) 2 Very Negative mention(s) Neutral

Does the media prefer PWR or EME?

In the previous week, EMCOR Group had 15 more articles in the media than Quanta Services. MarketBeat recorded 25 mentions for EMCOR Group and 10 mentions for Quanta Services. Quanta Services' average media sentiment score of 1.21 beat EMCOR Group's score of 0.97 indicating that Quanta Services is being referred to more favorably in the media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment Quanta Services 8 Very Positive mention(s) 1 Positive mention(s) 1 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive EMCOR Group 18 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 1 Neutral mention(s) 2 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive

Is PWR or ETN more profitable?

Eaton has a net margin of 12.75% compared to Quanta Services' net margin of 4.03%. Eaton's return on equity of 24.58% beat Quanta Services' return on equity. Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets Quanta Services 4.03% 20.55% 7.34% Eaton 12.75% 24.58% 9.98%

Does the media refer more to PWR or ETN?

In the previous week, Eaton had 27 more articles in the media than Quanta Services. MarketBeat recorded 37 mentions for Eaton and 10 mentions for Quanta Services. Quanta Services' average media sentiment score of 1.21 beat Eaton's score of 0.79 indicating that Quanta Services is being referred to more favorably in the media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment Quanta Services 8 Very Positive mention(s) 1 Positive mention(s) 1 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive Eaton 16 Very Positive mention(s) 9 Positive mention(s) 4 Neutral mention(s) 2 Negative mention(s) 1 Very Negative mention(s) Positive

Does the media prefer PWR or FIX?

In the previous week, Comfort Systems USA had 27 more articles in the media than Quanta Services. MarketBeat recorded 37 mentions for Comfort Systems USA and 10 mentions for Quanta Services. Comfort Systems USA's average media sentiment score of 1.26 beat Quanta Services' score of 1.21 indicating that Comfort Systems USA is being referred to more favorably in the news media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment Quanta Services 8 Very Positive mention(s) 1 Positive mention(s) 1 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive Comfort Systems USA 31 Very Positive mention(s) 1 Positive mention(s) 2 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive

Quanta Services (PWR) Competitors

$723.43 +37.65 (+5.49%)

Closing price 08/17/2026 03:58 PM Eastern

Extended Trading

$708.66 -14.78 (-2.04%)

As of 06:00 AM Eastern

Compare

PWR vs. MYRG, ACM, EME, ETN, and FIX

Should you buy Quanta Services stock or one of its competitors? Quanta Services's main competitors and comparable companies include MYR Group (MYRG), AECOM (ACM), EMCOR Group (EME), Eaton (ETN), and Comfort Systems USA (FIX). Companies are selected based on similarities in market, industry, and size. These companies are all part of the "industrials" sector.

How does Quanta Services compare to MYR Group?

Quanta Services (NYSE:PWR) and MYR Group (NASDAQ:MYRG) are both industrials companies, but which is the superior business? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their risk, dividends, earnings, valuation, institutional ownership, profitability, analyst recommendations and media sentiment.

Quanta Services currently has a consensus price target of $769.25, suggesting a potential upside of 6.33%. MYR Group has a consensus price target of $451.20, suggesting a potential upside of 32.40%. Given MYR Group's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe MYR Group is more favorable than Quanta Services.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Quanta Services	3 Sell rating(s)	7 Hold rating(s)	21 Buy rating(s)	1 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.63
MYR Group	0 Sell rating(s)	3 Hold rating(s)	3 Buy rating(s)	2 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.88

90.5% of Quanta Services shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 88.9% of MYR Group shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.6% of Quanta Services shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 1.9% of MYR Group shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Quanta Services has a beta of 1.23, meaning that its stock price is 23% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, MYR Group has a beta of 1.34, meaning that its stock price is 34% more volatile than the broader market.

Quanta Services has higher revenue and earnings than MYR Group. MYR Group is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Quanta Services, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Quanta Services	$28.48B	3.82	$1.03B	$8.73	82.87
MYR Group	$3.66B	1.45	$118.42M	$10.54	32.33

MYR Group has a net margin of 4.13% compared to Quanta Services' net margin of 4.03%. MYR Group's return on equity of 24.17% beat Quanta Services' return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Quanta Services	4.03%	20.55%	7.34%
MYR Group	4.13%	24.17%	9.96%

In the previous week, Quanta Services had 1 more articles in the media than MYR Group. MarketBeat recorded 10 mentions for Quanta Services and 9 mentions for MYR Group. MYR Group's average media sentiment score of 1.21 beat Quanta Services' score of 1.21 indicating that MYR Group is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Quanta Services	8 Very Positive mention(s)	1 Positive mention(s)	1 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive
MYR Group	4 Very Positive mention(s)	1 Positive mention(s)	2 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive

Summary

MYR Group beats Quanta Services on 10 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Quanta Services compare to AECOM?

Quanta Services (NYSE:PWR) and AECOM (NYSE:ACM) are both industrials companies, but which is the better investment? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their institutional ownership, valuation, media sentiment, risk, analyst recommendations, earnings, dividends and profitability.

Quanta Services has a beta of 1.23, meaning that its stock price is 23% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, AECOM has a beta of 0.93, meaning that its stock price is 7% less volatile than the broader market.

Quanta Services has a net margin of 4.03% compared to AECOM's net margin of 1.87%. Quanta Services' return on equity of 20.55% beat AECOM's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Quanta Services	4.03%	20.55%	7.34%
AECOM	1.87%	19.72%	4.10%

90.5% of Quanta Services shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 85.4% of AECOM shares are held by institutional investors. 0.6% of Quanta Services shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 0.5% of AECOM shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

In the previous week, AECOM had 25 more articles in the media than Quanta Services. MarketBeat recorded 35 mentions for AECOM and 10 mentions for Quanta Services. Quanta Services' average media sentiment score of 1.21 beat AECOM's score of 0.08 indicating that Quanta Services is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Quanta Services	8 Very Positive mention(s)	1 Positive mention(s)	1 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive
AECOM	7 Very Positive mention(s)	5 Positive mention(s)	11 Neutral mention(s)	4 Negative mention(s)	2 Very Negative mention(s)	Neutral

Quanta Services has higher revenue and earnings than AECOM. AECOM is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Quanta Services, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Quanta Services	$28.48B	3.82	$1.03B	$8.73	82.87
AECOM	$16.14B	0.50	$561.77M	$2.18	28.52

Quanta Services presently has a consensus price target of $769.25, indicating a potential upside of 6.33%. AECOM has a consensus price target of $94.58, indicating a potential upside of 52.11%. Given AECOM's higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe AECOM is more favorable than Quanta Services.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Quanta Services	3 Sell rating(s)	7 Hold rating(s)	21 Buy rating(s)	1 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.63
AECOM	2 Sell rating(s)	2 Hold rating(s)	9 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.54

Quanta Services pays an annual dividend of $0.44 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.1%. AECOM pays an annual dividend of $1.24 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.0%. Quanta Services pays out 5.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. AECOM pays out 56.9% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Quanta Services has increased its dividend for 6 consecutive years and AECOM has increased its dividend for 3 consecutive years.

Summary

Quanta Services beats AECOM on 17 of the 20 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Quanta Services compare to EMCOR Group?

Quanta Services (NYSE:PWR) and EMCOR Group (NYSE:EME) are both large-cap industrials companies, but which is the superior investment? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their earnings, risk, analyst recommendations, valuation, institutional ownership, media sentiment, dividends and profitability.

Quanta Services currently has a consensus target price of $769.25, indicating a potential upside of 6.33%. EMCOR Group has a consensus target price of $965.86, indicating a potential upside of 11.88%. Given EMCOR Group's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe EMCOR Group is more favorable than Quanta Services.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Quanta Services	3 Sell rating(s)	7 Hold rating(s)	21 Buy rating(s)	1 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.63
EMCOR Group	0 Sell rating(s)	1 Hold rating(s)	8 Buy rating(s)	1 Strong Buy rating(s)	3.00

EMCOR Group has a net margin of 7.74% compared to Quanta Services' net margin of 4.03%. EMCOR Group's return on equity of 35.49% beat Quanta Services' return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Quanta Services	4.03%	20.55%	7.34%
EMCOR Group	7.74%	35.49%	14.12%

90.5% of Quanta Services shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 92.6% of EMCOR Group shares are held by institutional investors. 0.6% of Quanta Services shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 0.7% of EMCOR Group shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Quanta Services pays an annual dividend of $0.44 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.1%. EMCOR Group pays an annual dividend of $1.60 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.2%. Quanta Services pays out 5.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. EMCOR Group pays out 5.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Quanta Services has raised its dividend for 6 consecutive years and EMCOR Group has raised its dividend for 5 consecutive years. EMCOR Group is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

In the previous week, EMCOR Group had 15 more articles in the media than Quanta Services. MarketBeat recorded 25 mentions for EMCOR Group and 10 mentions for Quanta Services. Quanta Services' average media sentiment score of 1.21 beat EMCOR Group's score of 0.97 indicating that Quanta Services is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Quanta Services	8 Very Positive mention(s)	1 Positive mention(s)	1 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive
EMCOR Group	18 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	1 Neutral mention(s)	2 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive

EMCOR Group has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Quanta Services. EMCOR Group is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Quanta Services, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Quanta Services	$28.48B	3.82	$1.03B	$8.73	82.87
EMCOR Group	$16.99B	2.24	$1.27B	$32.15	26.85

Quanta Services has a beta of 1.23, meaning that its stock price is 23% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, EMCOR Group has a beta of 1.14, meaning that its stock price is 14% more volatile than the broader market.

Summary

EMCOR Group beats Quanta Services on 12 of the 19 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Quanta Services compare to Eaton?

Quanta Services (NYSE:PWR) and Eaton (NYSE:ETN) are both large-cap industrials companies, but which is the superior business? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their valuation, earnings, profitability, media sentiment, dividends, analyst recommendations, risk and institutional ownership.

In the previous week, Eaton had 27 more articles in the media than Quanta Services. MarketBeat recorded 37 mentions for Eaton and 10 mentions for Quanta Services. Quanta Services' average media sentiment score of 1.21 beat Eaton's score of 0.79 indicating that Quanta Services is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Quanta Services	8 Very Positive mention(s)	1 Positive mention(s)	1 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive
Eaton	16 Very Positive mention(s)	9 Positive mention(s)	4 Neutral mention(s)	2 Negative mention(s)	1 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive

90.5% of Quanta Services shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 83.0% of Eaton shares are held by institutional investors. 0.6% of Quanta Services shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.1% of Eaton shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Quanta Services has a beta of 1.23, meaning that its share price is 23% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Eaton has a beta of 1.18, meaning that its share price is 18% more volatile than the broader market.

Quanta Services pays an annual dividend of $0.44 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.1%. Eaton pays an annual dividend of $4.40 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.0%. Quanta Services pays out 5.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Eaton pays out 44.8% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Quanta Services has increased its dividend for 6 consecutive years.

Quanta Services presently has a consensus price target of $769.25, suggesting a potential upside of 6.33%. Eaton has a consensus price target of $431.78, suggesting a potential downside of 5.53%. Given Quanta Services' higher possible upside, equities analysts plainly believe Quanta Services is more favorable than Eaton.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Quanta Services	3 Sell rating(s)	7 Hold rating(s)	21 Buy rating(s)	1 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.63
Eaton	0 Sell rating(s)	5 Hold rating(s)	13 Buy rating(s)	2 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.85

Eaton has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Quanta Services. Eaton is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Quanta Services, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Quanta Services	$28.48B	3.82	$1.03B	$8.73	82.87
Eaton	$27.45B	6.47	$4.09B	$9.83	46.49

Eaton has a net margin of 12.75% compared to Quanta Services' net margin of 4.03%. Eaton's return on equity of 24.58% beat Quanta Services' return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Quanta Services	4.03%	20.55%	7.34%
Eaton	12.75%	24.58%	9.98%

Summary

Quanta Services and Eaton tied by winning 10 of the 20 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Quanta Services compare to Comfort Systems USA?

Quanta Services (NYSE:PWR) and Comfort Systems USA (NYSE:FIX) are both large-cap industrials companies, but which is the better business? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their risk, institutional ownership, earnings, media sentiment, dividends, valuation, analyst recommendations and profitability.

Quanta Services presently has a consensus target price of $769.25, suggesting a potential upside of 6.33%. Comfort Systems USA has a consensus target price of $2,057.86, suggesting a potential upside of 9.46%. Given Comfort Systems USA's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Comfort Systems USA is more favorable than Quanta Services.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Quanta Services	3 Sell rating(s)	7 Hold rating(s)	21 Buy rating(s)	1 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.63
Comfort Systems USA	0 Sell rating(s)	1 Hold rating(s)	9 Buy rating(s)	1 Strong Buy rating(s)	3.00

Quanta Services has higher revenue and earnings than Comfort Systems USA. Comfort Systems USA is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Quanta Services, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Quanta Services	$28.48B	3.82	$1.03B	$8.73	82.87
Comfort Systems USA	$9.10B	7.27	$1.02B	$40.66	46.24

Quanta Services pays an annual dividend of $0.44 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.1%. Comfort Systems USA pays an annual dividend of $3.60 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.2%. Quanta Services pays out 5.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Comfort Systems USA pays out 8.9% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Quanta Services has increased its dividend for 6 consecutive years and Comfort Systems USA has increased its dividend for 13 consecutive years. Comfort Systems USA is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

90.5% of Quanta Services shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 96.5% of Comfort Systems USA shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.6% of Quanta Services shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 1.2% of Comfort Systems USA shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Quanta Services has a beta of 1.23, suggesting that its share price is 23% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Comfort Systems USA has a beta of 1.69, suggesting that its share price is 69% more volatile than the broader market.

Comfort Systems USA has a net margin of 12.77% compared to Quanta Services' net margin of 4.03%. Comfort Systems USA's return on equity of 53.55% beat Quanta Services' return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Quanta Services	4.03%	20.55%	7.34%
Comfort Systems USA	12.77%	53.55%	20.75%

In the previous week, Comfort Systems USA had 27 more articles in the media than Quanta Services. MarketBeat recorded 37 mentions for Comfort Systems USA and 10 mentions for Quanta Services. Comfort Systems USA's average media sentiment score of 1.26 beat Quanta Services' score of 1.21 indicating that Comfort Systems USA is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Quanta Services	8 Very Positive mention(s)	1 Positive mention(s)	1 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive
Comfort Systems USA	31 Very Positive mention(s)	1 Positive mention(s)	2 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive

Summary

Comfort Systems USA beats Quanta Services on 14 of the 19 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Quanta Services News Delivered to You Automatically

Subscribe Now

SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding PWR and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of NYSE and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.

PWR vs. The Competition

Export

Metric	Quanta Services	Construction & Engineering Industry	Industrials Sector	NYSE Exchange
Market Cap	$103.10B	$8.58B	$10.96B	$24.35B
Dividend Yield	0.06%	2.63%	97.32%	3.69%
P/E Ratio	82.87	24.63	27.55	30.51
Price / Sales	3.82	60.07	338.85	20.20
Price / Cash	42.73	19.37	24.92	20.48
Price / Book	11.95	5.04	4.99	4.92
Net Income	$1.03B	$482.60M	$609.63M	$1.07B
7 Day Performance	7.91%	0.44%	0.49%	0.13%
1 Month Performance	15.17%	-0.70%	3.74%	2.60%
1 Year Performance	88.67%	29.09%	14.33%	18.42%

Quanta Services Competitors List

Export

Company	MarketRank	Share Price	Analysts' Price Target	1Y Price Performance	Market Cap	Revenue	P/E Ratio	Employee Count	Indicator(s)
PWR Quanta Services	3.7544 of 5 stars	$723.43 +5.5%	$769.25 +6.3%	+90.4%	$103.10B	$28.48B	82.87	69,500	Positive News Analyst Forecast
MYRG MYR Group	4.7476 of 5 stars	$330.31 -2.1%	$426.00 +29.0%	+88.3%	$5.14B	$4.01B	31.34	9,000	Positive News Analyst Upgrade
ACM AECOM	4.864 of 5 stars	$73.00 -3.7%	$114.82 +57.3%	-47.9%	$9.38B	$16.14B	19.06	51,000	Gap Down High Trading Volume
EME EMCOR Group	4.8588 of 5 stars	$810.22 -0.8%	$965.86 +19.2%	+42.7%	$35.74B	$18.60B	25.20	44,000
ETN Eaton	4.235 of 5 stars	$444.98 -0.8%	$431.78 -3.0%	+30.3%	$172.83B	$27.45B	45.27	97,000	Analyst Downgrade

Related Companies and Tools

Related Companies

Top 10 Stock Comparisons

This page (NYSE:PWR) was last updated on 8/18/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.

From Our Partners

Unlock superior investment research and tools.

Get MarketBeat All Access

In-depth profiles and analysis for 20,000 public companies.
Real-time analyst ratings, insider transactions, earnings data, and more.
Our daily ratings and market update email newsletter.

Sign In
Create Account

Your Email Address:

Your Password:

Forgot your password?

Your Email Address:

Choose a Password:

By creating a free account, you agree to our terms of service. This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

Quanta Services (PWR) Competitors

PWR vs. MYRG, ACM, EME, ETN, and FIX

How does Quanta Services compare to MYR Group?

Summary

How does Quanta Services compare to AECOM?

Summary

How does Quanta Services compare to EMCOR Group?

Summary

How does Quanta Services compare to Eaton?

Summary

How does Quanta Services compare to Comfort Systems USA?

Summary

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

Media Sentiment Over Time

PWR vs. The Competition

Quanta Services Competitors List

Related Companies and Tools

Best-in-Class Portfolio Monitoring

Stock Ideas and Recommendations

Advanced Stock Screeners and Research Tools

About MarketBeat

MarketBeat Products

Popular Tools

Financial Calendars

Terms & Info

Quanta Services (PWR) Competitors

PWR vs. MYRG, ACM, EME, ETN, and FIX

How does Quanta Services compare to MYR Group?

Do analysts rate PWR or MYRG?

Do insiders & institutionals have more ownership in PWR or MYRG?

Which has more risk & volatility, PWR or MYRG?

Which has stronger valuation and earnings, PWR or MYRG?

Is PWR or MYRG more profitable?

Does the media refer more to PWR or MYRG?

Summary

How does Quanta Services compare to AECOM?

Which has more risk and volatility, PWR or ACM?

Is PWR or ACM more profitable?

Do insiders & institutionals have more ownership in PWR or ACM?

Does the media favor PWR or ACM?

Which has preferable valuation and earnings, PWR or ACM?

Do analysts prefer PWR or ACM?

Is PWR or ACM a better dividend stock?

Summary

How does Quanta Services compare to EMCOR Group?

Do analysts recommend PWR or EME?

Is PWR or EME more profitable?

Do institutionals and insiders hold more shares of PWR or EME?

Is PWR or EME a better dividend stock?

Does the media prefer PWR or EME?

Which has better earnings and valuation, PWR or EME?

Which has more volatility & risk, PWR or EME?

Summary

How does Quanta Services compare to Eaton?

Does the media refer more to PWR or ETN?

Do insiders and institutionals have more ownership in PWR or ETN?

Which has more risk & volatility, PWR or ETN?

Is PWR or ETN a better dividend stock?

Do analysts recommend PWR or ETN?

Which has stronger valuation and earnings, PWR or ETN?

Is PWR or ETN more profitable?

Summary

How does Quanta Services compare to Comfort Systems USA?

Do analysts prefer PWR or FIX?

Which has higher earnings and valuation, PWR or FIX?

Is PWR or FIX a better dividend stock?

Do insiders and institutionals have more ownership in PWR or FIX?

Which has more volatility and risk, PWR or FIX?

Is PWR or FIX more profitable?

Does the media prefer PWR or FIX?

Summary

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

Media Sentiment Over Time

PWR vs. The Competition

Quanta Services Competitors List

Related Companies and Tools

MarketBeat All Access Features

Best-in-Class Portfolio Monitoring

Stock Ideas and Recommendations

Advanced Stock Screeners and Research Tools