Quanta Services (PWR) Competitors

Quanta Services logo
$704.35 -10.50 (-1.47%)
Closing price 03:59 PM Eastern
Extended Trading
$705.00 +0.65 (+0.09%)
As of 07:08 PM Eastern
Extended trading is trading that happens on electronic markets outside of regular trading hours. This is a fair market value extended hours price provided by Massive. Learn more.

PWR vs. MYRG, ACM, EME, ETN, and FIX

Should you buy Quanta Services stock or one of its competitors? MarketBeat compares Quanta Services with other companies and stocks that may be similar based on industry, sector, market capitalization, business model, investor interest, or shared news coverage. Companies and stocks commonly compared with Quanta Services include MYR Group (MYRG), AECOM (ACM), EMCOR Group (EME), Eaton (ETN), and Comfort Systems USA (FIX).

How does Quanta Services compare to MYR Group?

MYR Group (NASDAQ:MYRG) and Quanta Services (NYSE:PWR) are both construction & engineering companies, but which is the superior investment? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their media sentiment, risk, analyst recommendations, profitability, valuation, dividends, institutional ownership and earnings.

In the previous week, Quanta Services had 36 more articles in the media than MYR Group. MarketBeat recorded 43 mentions for Quanta Services and 7 mentions for MYR Group. Quanta Services' average media sentiment score of 1.38 beat MYR Group's score of 1.13 indicating that Quanta Services is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
MYR Group
6 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
Quanta Services
39 Very Positive mention(s)
4 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

88.9% of MYR Group shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 90.5% of Quanta Services shares are owned by institutional investors. 1.9% of MYR Group shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.6% of Quanta Services shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

MYR Group presently has a consensus target price of $358.17, indicating a potential downside of 22.32%. Quanta Services has a consensus target price of $733.87, indicating a potential upside of 4.19%. Given Quanta Services' higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Quanta Services is more favorable than MYR Group.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
MYR Group
0 Sell rating(s)
4 Hold rating(s)
3 Buy rating(s)
2 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.78
Quanta Services
0 Sell rating(s)
7 Hold rating(s)
19 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.78

MYR Group has a net margin of 3.71% compared to Quanta Services' net margin of 3.67%. MYR Group's return on equity of 22.14% beat Quanta Services' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
MYR Group3.71% 22.14% 8.67%
Quanta Services 3.67%18.64%6.88%

MYR Group has a beta of 1.32, meaning that its stock price is 32% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Quanta Services has a beta of 1.2, meaning that its stock price is 20% more volatile than the broader market.

Quanta Services has higher revenue and earnings than MYR Group. MYR Group is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Quanta Services, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
MYR Group$3.82B1.88$118.42M$9.0750.84
Quanta Services$30.12B3.51$1.03B$7.2996.62

Summary

Quanta Services beats MYR Group on 9 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Quanta Services compare to AECOM?

AECOM (NYSE:ACM) and Quanta Services (NYSE:PWR) are both construction companies, but which is the better investment? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their profitability, risk, media sentiment, analyst recommendations, earnings, valuation, dividends and institutional ownership.

85.4% of AECOM shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 90.5% of Quanta Services shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.5% of AECOM shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 0.6% of Quanta Services shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

AECOM presently has a consensus target price of $116.00, indicating a potential upside of 68.69%. Quanta Services has a consensus target price of $733.87, indicating a potential upside of 4.19%. Given AECOM's higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe AECOM is more favorable than Quanta Services.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
AECOM
0 Sell rating(s)
4 Hold rating(s)
9 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.69
Quanta Services
0 Sell rating(s)
7 Hold rating(s)
19 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.78

In the previous week, Quanta Services had 23 more articles in the media than AECOM. MarketBeat recorded 43 mentions for Quanta Services and 20 mentions for AECOM. Quanta Services' average media sentiment score of 1.38 beat AECOM's score of 1.38 indicating that Quanta Services is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
AECOM
14 Very Positive mention(s)
2 Positive mention(s)
3 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
Quanta Services
39 Very Positive mention(s)
4 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

AECOM has a beta of 0.93, meaning that its stock price is 7% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Quanta Services has a beta of 1.2, meaning that its stock price is 20% more volatile than the broader market.

AECOM pays an annual dividend of $1.24 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.8%. Quanta Services pays an annual dividend of $0.44 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.1%. AECOM pays out 32.4% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Quanta Services pays out 6.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. AECOM has raised its dividend for 3 consecutive years and Quanta Services has raised its dividend for 6 consecutive years.

Quanta Services has a net margin of 3.67% compared to AECOM's net margin of 3.16%. AECOM's return on equity of 28.52% beat Quanta Services' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
AECOM3.16% 28.52% 6.08%
Quanta Services 3.67%18.64%6.88%

Quanta Services has higher revenue and earnings than AECOM. AECOM is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Quanta Services, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
AECOM$15.99B0.55$561.77M$3.8317.95
Quanta Services$30.12B3.51$1.03B$7.2996.62

Summary

Quanta Services beats AECOM on 17 of the 20 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Quanta Services compare to EMCOR Group?

EMCOR Group (NYSE:EME) and Quanta Services (NYSE:PWR) are both large-cap construction companies, but which is the superior investment? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their valuation, dividends, institutional ownership, profitability, earnings, media sentiment, analyst recommendations and risk.

EMCOR Group has a net margin of 7.54% compared to Quanta Services' net margin of 3.67%. EMCOR Group's return on equity of 35.19% beat Quanta Services' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
EMCOR Group7.54% 35.19% 13.68%
Quanta Services 3.67%18.64%6.88%

EMCOR Group currently has a consensus price target of $871.25, suggesting a potential upside of 4.02%. Quanta Services has a consensus price target of $733.87, suggesting a potential upside of 4.19%. Given Quanta Services' stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Quanta Services is more favorable than EMCOR Group.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
EMCOR Group
0 Sell rating(s)
4 Hold rating(s)
10 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.71
Quanta Services
0 Sell rating(s)
7 Hold rating(s)
19 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.78

EMCOR Group pays an annual dividend of $1.60 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.2%. Quanta Services pays an annual dividend of $0.44 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.1%. EMCOR Group pays out 5.4% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Quanta Services pays out 6.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. EMCOR Group has raised its dividend for 5 consecutive years and Quanta Services has raised its dividend for 6 consecutive years. EMCOR Group is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

EMCOR Group has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Quanta Services. EMCOR Group is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Quanta Services, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
EMCOR Group$17.75B2.10$1.27B$29.8128.10
Quanta Services$30.12B3.51$1.03B$7.2996.62

In the previous week, Quanta Services had 21 more articles in the media than EMCOR Group. MarketBeat recorded 43 mentions for Quanta Services and 22 mentions for EMCOR Group. EMCOR Group's average media sentiment score of 1.40 beat Quanta Services' score of 1.38 indicating that EMCOR Group is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
EMCOR Group
19 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
1 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
Quanta Services
39 Very Positive mention(s)
4 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

EMCOR Group has a beta of 1.12, indicating that its share price is 12% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Quanta Services has a beta of 1.2, indicating that its share price is 20% more volatile than the broader market.

92.6% of EMCOR Group shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 90.5% of Quanta Services shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.8% of EMCOR Group shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.6% of Quanta Services shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Summary

EMCOR Group and Quanta Services tied by winning 10 of the 20 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Quanta Services compare to Eaton?

Eaton (NYSE:ETN) and Quanta Services (NYSE:PWR) are related large-cap companies, but which is the superior stock? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, earnings, dividends, institutional ownership, risk, profitability, valuation and media sentiment.

83.0% of Eaton shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 90.5% of Quanta Services shares are held by institutional investors. 0.1% of Eaton shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.6% of Quanta Services shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Eaton has a beta of 1.19, meaning that its stock price is 19% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Quanta Services has a beta of 1.2, meaning that its stock price is 20% more volatile than the broader market.

Eaton pays an annual dividend of $4.40 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.0%. Quanta Services pays an annual dividend of $0.44 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.1%. Eaton pays out 43.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Quanta Services pays out 6.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Quanta Services has increased its dividend for 6 consecutive years.

In the previous week, Quanta Services had 20 more articles in the media than Eaton. MarketBeat recorded 43 mentions for Quanta Services and 23 mentions for Eaton. Quanta Services' average media sentiment score of 1.38 beat Eaton's score of 0.92 indicating that Quanta Services is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Eaton
15 Very Positive mention(s)
4 Positive mention(s)
4 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
Quanta Services
39 Very Positive mention(s)
4 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

Eaton presently has a consensus price target of $420.95, suggesting a potential downside of 0.37%. Quanta Services has a consensus price target of $733.87, suggesting a potential upside of 4.19%. Given Quanta Services' higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Quanta Services is more favorable than Eaton.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Eaton
0 Sell rating(s)
4 Hold rating(s)
15 Buy rating(s)
2 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.90
Quanta Services
0 Sell rating(s)
7 Hold rating(s)
19 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.78

Eaton has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Quanta Services. Eaton is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Quanta Services, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Eaton$27.45B5.98$4.09B$10.2341.30
Quanta Services$30.12B3.51$1.03B$7.2996.62

Eaton has a net margin of 13.99% compared to Quanta Services' net margin of 3.67%. Eaton's return on equity of 24.72% beat Quanta Services' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Eaton13.99% 24.72% 10.69%
Quanta Services 3.67%18.64%6.88%

Summary

Quanta Services beats Eaton on 11 of the 20 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Quanta Services compare to Comfort Systems USA?

Comfort Systems USA (NYSE:FIX) and Quanta Services (NYSE:PWR) are both large-cap construction companies, but which is the better stock? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their institutional ownership, analyst recommendations, valuation, profitability, dividends, earnings, media sentiment and risk.

Comfort Systems USA presently has a consensus target price of $1,991.50, suggesting a potential upside of 1.03%. Quanta Services has a consensus target price of $733.87, suggesting a potential upside of 4.19%. Given Quanta Services' higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Quanta Services is more favorable than Comfort Systems USA.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Comfort Systems USA
0 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
9 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00
Quanta Services
0 Sell rating(s)
7 Hold rating(s)
19 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.78

Quanta Services has higher revenue and earnings than Comfort Systems USA. Comfort Systems USA is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Quanta Services, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Comfort Systems USA$10.14B6.85$1.02B$34.6656.87
Quanta Services$30.12B3.51$1.03B$7.2996.62

Comfort Systems USA has a net margin of 12.07% compared to Quanta Services' net margin of 3.67%. Comfort Systems USA's return on equity of 51.69% beat Quanta Services' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Comfort Systems USA12.07% 51.69% 20.21%
Quanta Services 3.67%18.64%6.88%

Comfort Systems USA has a beta of 1.65, indicating that its stock price is 65% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Quanta Services has a beta of 1.2, indicating that its stock price is 20% more volatile than the broader market.

96.5% of Comfort Systems USA shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 90.5% of Quanta Services shares are owned by institutional investors. 1.2% of Comfort Systems USA shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.6% of Quanta Services shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

In the previous week, Quanta Services had 3 more articles in the media than Comfort Systems USA. MarketBeat recorded 43 mentions for Quanta Services and 40 mentions for Comfort Systems USA. Comfort Systems USA's average media sentiment score of 1.67 beat Quanta Services' score of 1.38 indicating that Comfort Systems USA is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Comfort Systems USA
36 Very Positive mention(s)
2 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Very Positive
Quanta Services
39 Very Positive mention(s)
4 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

Comfort Systems USA pays an annual dividend of $3.20 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.2%. Quanta Services pays an annual dividend of $0.44 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.1%. Comfort Systems USA pays out 9.2% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Quanta Services pays out 6.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Comfort Systems USA has raised its dividend for 13 consecutive years and Quanta Services has raised its dividend for 6 consecutive years. Comfort Systems USA is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

Summary

Comfort Systems USA beats Quanta Services on 12 of the 19 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Quanta Services News Delivered to You Automatically

Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for PWR and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.

Subscribe Now
SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding PWR and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.
Skip Chart

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of NYSE and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Skip Chart

PWR vs. The Competition

MetricQuanta ServicesENGINRG/R&D SVS IndustryConstruction SectorNYSE Exchange
Market Cap$105.70B$10.25B$10.09B$23.18B
Dividend Yield0.06%1.88%1.89%4.07%
P/E Ratio96.6224.4418.9731.62
Price / Sales3.511.964.14103.64
Price / Cash44.8225.3117.3624.31
Price / Book11.634.825.404.68
Net Income$1.03B$224.31M$563.99M$1.08B
7 Day Performance3.00%1.40%1.94%-0.26%
1 Month Performance-2.58%3.01%20.41%2.18%
1 Year Performance95.39%27.23%16.03%24.66%

Quanta Services Competitors List

CompanyMarketRankShare PriceAnalysts' Price Target1Y Price PerformanceMarket CapRevenueP/E RatioEmployee CountIndicator(s)
PWR
Quanta Services
4.5542 of 5 stars
$704.35
-1.5%
$733.87
+4.2%
+98.9%$105.70B$30.12B96.6269,500
MYRG
MYR Group
2.4708 of 5 stars
$449.94
+0.9%
$358.17
-20.4%
+166.1%$7.01B$3.82B49.619,000
ACM
AECOM
4.9972 of 5 stars
$69.56
-0.8%
$116.00
+66.8%
-38.1%$8.94B$15.99B18.1651,000
EME
EMCOR Group
4.1279 of 5 stars
$841.12
+2.2%
$836.88
-0.5%
+71.5%$37.38B$17.75B28.2244,000
ETN
Eaton
3.9565 of 5 stars
$407.13
+4.0%
$420.95
+3.4%
+24.0%$158.09B$27.45B39.8097,000

Related Companies and Tools


This page (NYSE:PWR) was last updated on 6/18/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.
From Our Partners