Is MYRG or PWR more profitable?

MYR Group has a net margin of 3.71% compared to Quanta Services' net margin of 3.67%. MYR Group's return on equity of 22.14% beat Quanta Services' return on equity. Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets MYR Group 3.71% 22.14% 8.67% Quanta Services 3.67% 18.64% 6.88%

Does the media prefer MYRG or PWR?

In the previous week, Quanta Services had 30 more articles in the media than MYR Group. MarketBeat recorded 34 mentions for Quanta Services and 4 mentions for MYR Group. MYR Group's average media sentiment score of 1.34 beat Quanta Services' score of 1.17 indicating that MYR Group is being referred to more favorably in the media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment MYR Group 4 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 0 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive Quanta Services 24 Very Positive mention(s) 5 Positive mention(s) 3 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive

Which has preferable earnings & valuation, ACM or PWR?

Quanta Services has higher revenue and earnings than AECOM. AECOM is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Quanta Services, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks. Company Gross Revenue Price/Sales Ratio Net Income Earnings Per Share Price/Earnings Ratio AECOM $16.14B 0.54 $561.77M $3.83 17.73 Quanta Services $28.48B 3.51 $1.03B $7.29 91.31

Is ACM or PWR more profitable?

Quanta Services has a net margin of 3.67% compared to AECOM's net margin of 3.16%. AECOM's return on equity of 28.52% beat Quanta Services' return on equity. Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets AECOM 3.16% 28.52% 6.08% Quanta Services 3.67% 18.64% 6.88%

Does the media refer more to ACM or PWR?

In the previous week, Quanta Services had 20 more articles in the media than AECOM. MarketBeat recorded 34 mentions for Quanta Services and 14 mentions for AECOM. Quanta Services' average media sentiment score of 1.17 beat AECOM's score of 0.37 indicating that Quanta Services is being referred to more favorably in the news media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment AECOM 6 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 5 Neutral mention(s) 2 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Neutral Quanta Services 24 Very Positive mention(s) 5 Positive mention(s) 3 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive

Does the media favor EME or PWR?

In the previous week, Quanta Services had 14 more articles in the media than EMCOR Group. MarketBeat recorded 34 mentions for Quanta Services and 20 mentions for EMCOR Group. EMCOR Group's average media sentiment score of 1.20 beat Quanta Services' score of 1.17 indicating that EMCOR Group is being referred to more favorably in the media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment EMCOR Group 13 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 5 Neutral mention(s) 1 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive Quanta Services 24 Very Positive mention(s) 5 Positive mention(s) 3 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive

Is PWR or ETN more profitable?

Eaton has a net margin of 13.99% compared to Quanta Services' net margin of 3.67%. Eaton's return on equity of 24.72% beat Quanta Services' return on equity. Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets Quanta Services 3.67% 18.64% 6.88% Eaton 13.99% 24.72% 10.69%

Does the media refer more to PWR or ETN?

In the previous week, Quanta Services had 7 more articles in the media than Eaton. MarketBeat recorded 34 mentions for Quanta Services and 27 mentions for Eaton. Quanta Services' average media sentiment score of 1.17 beat Eaton's score of 0.74 indicating that Quanta Services is being referred to more favorably in the media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment Quanta Services 24 Very Positive mention(s) 5 Positive mention(s) 3 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive Eaton 12 Very Positive mention(s) 5 Positive mention(s) 6 Neutral mention(s) 3 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive

Does the media prefer FIX or PWR?

In the previous week, Quanta Services had 5 more articles in the media than Comfort Systems USA. MarketBeat recorded 34 mentions for Quanta Services and 29 mentions for Comfort Systems USA. Comfort Systems USA's average media sentiment score of 1.54 beat Quanta Services' score of 1.17 indicating that Comfort Systems USA is being referred to more favorably in the media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment Comfort Systems USA 24 Very Positive mention(s) 3 Positive mention(s) 2 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Very Positive Quanta Services 24 Very Positive mention(s) 5 Positive mention(s) 3 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive

Quanta Services (PWR) Competitors

$665.65 +8.86 (+1.35%)

Closing price 03:59 PM Eastern

Extended Trading

$666.62 +0.97 (+0.15%)

As of 07:57 PM Eastern

Compare

PWR vs. MYRG, ACM, EME, ETN, and FIX

Should you buy Quanta Services stock or one of its competitors? MarketBeat compares Quanta Services with other companies and stocks that may be similar based on industry, sector, market capitalization, business model, investor interest, or shared news coverage. Companies and stocks commonly compared with Quanta Services include MYR Group (MYRG), AECOM (ACM), EMCOR Group (EME), Eaton (ETN), and Comfort Systems USA (FIX).

How does Quanta Services compare to MYR Group?

MYR Group (NASDAQ:MYRG) and Quanta Services (NYSE:PWR) are both construction & engineering companies, but which is the superior stock? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their profitability, earnings, institutional ownership, analyst recommendations, risk, dividends, media sentiment and valuation.

MYR Group currently has a consensus target price of $358.17, indicating a potential downside of 14.68%. Quanta Services has a consensus target price of $755.18, indicating a potential upside of 13.45%. Given Quanta Services' higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Quanta Services is more favorable than MYR Group.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
MYR Group	0 Sell rating(s)	4 Hold rating(s)	3 Buy rating(s)	2 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.78
Quanta Services	0 Sell rating(s)	7 Hold rating(s)	19 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.73

MYR Group has a beta of 1.31, indicating that its share price is 31% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Quanta Services has a beta of 1.21, indicating that its share price is 21% more volatile than the broader market.

MYR Group has a net margin of 3.71% compared to Quanta Services' net margin of 3.67%. MYR Group's return on equity of 22.14% beat Quanta Services' return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
MYR Group	3.71%	22.14%	8.67%
Quanta Services	3.67%	18.64%	6.88%

Quanta Services has higher revenue and earnings than MYR Group. MYR Group is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Quanta Services, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
MYR Group	$3.66B	1.79	$118.42M	$9.07	46.28
Quanta Services	$28.48B	3.51	$1.03B	$7.29	91.31

In the previous week, Quanta Services had 30 more articles in the media than MYR Group. MarketBeat recorded 34 mentions for Quanta Services and 4 mentions for MYR Group. MYR Group's average media sentiment score of 1.34 beat Quanta Services' score of 1.17 indicating that MYR Group is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
MYR Group	4 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	0 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive
Quanta Services	24 Very Positive mention(s)	5 Positive mention(s)	3 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive

88.9% of MYR Group shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 90.5% of Quanta Services shares are held by institutional investors. 1.9% of MYR Group shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.6% of Quanta Services shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Summary

MYR Group beats Quanta Services on 9 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Quanta Services compare to AECOM?

AECOM (NYSE:ACM) and Quanta Services (NYSE:PWR) are both construction companies, but which is the better business? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their risk, valuation, analyst recommendations, dividends, institutional ownership, profitability, media sentiment and earnings.

AECOM pays an annual dividend of $1.24 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.8%. Quanta Services pays an annual dividend of $0.44 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.1%. AECOM pays out 32.4% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Quanta Services pays out 6.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. AECOM has increased its dividend for 3 consecutive years and Quanta Services has increased its dividend for 6 consecutive years.

Quanta Services has higher revenue and earnings than AECOM. AECOM is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Quanta Services, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
AECOM	$16.14B	0.54	$561.77M	$3.83	17.73
Quanta Services	$28.48B	3.51	$1.03B	$7.29	91.31

Quanta Services has a net margin of 3.67% compared to AECOM's net margin of 3.16%. AECOM's return on equity of 28.52% beat Quanta Services' return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
AECOM	3.16%	28.52%	6.08%
Quanta Services	3.67%	18.64%	6.88%

85.4% of AECOM shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 90.5% of Quanta Services shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.5% of AECOM shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.6% of Quanta Services shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

AECOM presently has a consensus target price of $115.36, indicating a potential upside of 69.86%. Quanta Services has a consensus target price of $755.18, indicating a potential upside of 13.45%. Given AECOM's higher possible upside, equities research analysts plainly believe AECOM is more favorable than Quanta Services.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
AECOM	0 Sell rating(s)	4 Hold rating(s)	9 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.69
Quanta Services	0 Sell rating(s)	7 Hold rating(s)	19 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.73

In the previous week, Quanta Services had 20 more articles in the media than AECOM. MarketBeat recorded 34 mentions for Quanta Services and 14 mentions for AECOM. Quanta Services' average media sentiment score of 1.17 beat AECOM's score of 0.37 indicating that Quanta Services is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
AECOM	6 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	5 Neutral mention(s)	2 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Neutral
Quanta Services	24 Very Positive mention(s)	5 Positive mention(s)	3 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive

AECOM has a beta of 0.93, meaning that its share price is 7% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Quanta Services has a beta of 1.21, meaning that its share price is 21% more volatile than the broader market.

Summary

Quanta Services beats AECOM on 16 of the 19 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Quanta Services compare to EMCOR Group?

EMCOR Group (NYSE:EME) and Quanta Services (NYSE:PWR) are both large-cap construction companies, but which is the better stock? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their media sentiment, dividends, earnings, analyst recommendations, profitability, institutional ownership, valuation and risk.

EMCOR Group has a beta of 1.13, indicating that its share price is 13% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Quanta Services has a beta of 1.21, indicating that its share price is 21% more volatile than the broader market.

EMCOR Group has a net margin of 7.54% compared to Quanta Services' net margin of 3.67%. EMCOR Group's return on equity of 35.19% beat Quanta Services' return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
EMCOR Group	7.54%	35.19%	13.68%
Quanta Services	3.67%	18.64%	6.88%

EMCOR Group presently has a consensus price target of $871.25, suggesting a potential upside of 13.31%. Quanta Services has a consensus price target of $755.18, suggesting a potential upside of 13.45%. Given Quanta Services' higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Quanta Services is more favorable than EMCOR Group.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
EMCOR Group	0 Sell rating(s)	2 Hold rating(s)	8 Buy rating(s)	1 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.91
Quanta Services	0 Sell rating(s)	7 Hold rating(s)	19 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.73

In the previous week, Quanta Services had 14 more articles in the media than EMCOR Group. MarketBeat recorded 34 mentions for Quanta Services and 20 mentions for EMCOR Group. EMCOR Group's average media sentiment score of 1.20 beat Quanta Services' score of 1.17 indicating that EMCOR Group is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
EMCOR Group	13 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	5 Neutral mention(s)	1 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive
Quanta Services	24 Very Positive mention(s)	5 Positive mention(s)	3 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive

EMCOR Group pays an annual dividend of $1.60 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.2%. Quanta Services pays an annual dividend of $0.44 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.1%. EMCOR Group pays out 5.4% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Quanta Services pays out 6.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. EMCOR Group has raised its dividend for 5 consecutive years and Quanta Services has raised its dividend for 6 consecutive years. EMCOR Group is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

EMCOR Group has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Quanta Services. EMCOR Group is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Quanta Services, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
EMCOR Group	$16.99B	2.01	$1.27B	$29.81	25.79
Quanta Services	$28.48B	3.51	$1.03B	$7.29	91.31

92.6% of EMCOR Group shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 90.5% of Quanta Services shares are held by institutional investors. 0.8% of EMCOR Group shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 0.6% of Quanta Services shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Summary

EMCOR Group beats Quanta Services on 12 of the 20 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Quanta Services compare to Eaton?

Quanta Services (NYSE:PWR) and Eaton (NYSE:ETN) are related large-cap companies, but which is the superior investment? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their media sentiment, valuation, dividends, profitability, risk, earnings, analyst recommendations and institutional ownership.

Quanta Services has a beta of 1.21, indicating that its share price is 21% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Eaton has a beta of 1.18, indicating that its share price is 18% more volatile than the broader market.

90.5% of Quanta Services shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 83.0% of Eaton shares are held by institutional investors. 0.6% of Quanta Services shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 0.1% of Eaton shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Quanta Services pays an annual dividend of $0.44 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.1%. Eaton pays an annual dividend of $4.40 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.1%. Quanta Services pays out 6.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Eaton pays out 43.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Quanta Services has raised its dividend for 6 consecutive years.

Eaton has a net margin of 13.99% compared to Quanta Services' net margin of 3.67%. Eaton's return on equity of 24.72% beat Quanta Services' return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Quanta Services	3.67%	18.64%	6.88%
Eaton	13.99%	24.72%	10.69%

In the previous week, Quanta Services had 7 more articles in the media than Eaton. MarketBeat recorded 34 mentions for Quanta Services and 27 mentions for Eaton. Quanta Services' average media sentiment score of 1.17 beat Eaton's score of 0.74 indicating that Quanta Services is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Quanta Services	24 Very Positive mention(s)	5 Positive mention(s)	3 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive
Eaton	12 Very Positive mention(s)	5 Positive mention(s)	6 Neutral mention(s)	3 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive

Quanta Services presently has a consensus price target of $755.18, suggesting a potential upside of 13.45%. Eaton has a consensus price target of $423.00, suggesting a potential upside of 5.76%. Given Quanta Services' higher possible upside, equities research analysts plainly believe Quanta Services is more favorable than Eaton.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Quanta Services	0 Sell rating(s)	7 Hold rating(s)	19 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.73
Eaton	0 Sell rating(s)	4 Hold rating(s)	14 Buy rating(s)	2 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.90

Eaton has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Quanta Services. Eaton is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Quanta Services, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Quanta Services	$28.48B	3.51	$1.03B	$7.29	91.31
Eaton	$27.45B	5.66	$4.09B	$10.23	39.10

Summary

Quanta Services beats Eaton on 11 of the 20 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Quanta Services compare to Comfort Systems USA?

Comfort Systems USA (NYSE:FIX) and Quanta Services (NYSE:PWR) are both large-cap construction companies, but which is the better stock? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their institutional ownership, risk, media sentiment, valuation, profitability, analyst recommendations, earnings and dividends.

In the previous week, Quanta Services had 5 more articles in the media than Comfort Systems USA. MarketBeat recorded 34 mentions for Quanta Services and 29 mentions for Comfort Systems USA. Comfort Systems USA's average media sentiment score of 1.54 beat Quanta Services' score of 1.17 indicating that Comfort Systems USA is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Comfort Systems USA	24 Very Positive mention(s)	3 Positive mention(s)	2 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Very Positive
Quanta Services	24 Very Positive mention(s)	5 Positive mention(s)	3 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive

Comfort Systems USA presently has a consensus price target of $1,991.50, suggesting a potential upside of 18.19%. Quanta Services has a consensus price target of $755.18, suggesting a potential upside of 13.45%. Given Comfort Systems USA's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, equities analysts plainly believe Comfort Systems USA is more favorable than Quanta Services.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Comfort Systems USA	0 Sell rating(s)	2 Hold rating(s)	9 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.82
Quanta Services	0 Sell rating(s)	7 Hold rating(s)	19 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.73

Quanta Services has higher revenue and earnings than Comfort Systems USA. Comfort Systems USA is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Quanta Services, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Comfort Systems USA	$9.10B	6.52	$1.02B	$34.66	48.61
Quanta Services	$28.48B	3.51	$1.03B	$7.29	91.31

Comfort Systems USA has a beta of 1.66, meaning that its share price is 66% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Quanta Services has a beta of 1.21, meaning that its share price is 21% more volatile than the broader market.

96.5% of Comfort Systems USA shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 90.5% of Quanta Services shares are held by institutional investors. 1.2% of Comfort Systems USA shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.6% of Quanta Services shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Comfort Systems USA pays an annual dividend of $3.20 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.2%. Quanta Services pays an annual dividend of $0.44 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.1%. Comfort Systems USA pays out 9.2% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Quanta Services pays out 6.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Comfort Systems USA has raised its dividend for 13 consecutive years and Quanta Services has raised its dividend for 6 consecutive years. Comfort Systems USA is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

Comfort Systems USA has a net margin of 12.07% compared to Quanta Services' net margin of 3.67%. Comfort Systems USA's return on equity of 51.69% beat Quanta Services' return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Comfort Systems USA	12.07%	51.69%	20.21%
Quanta Services	3.67%	18.64%	6.88%

Summary

Comfort Systems USA beats Quanta Services on 13 of the 19 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Quanta Services News Delivered to You Automatically

Subscribe Now

SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding PWR and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of NYSE and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.

PWR vs. The Competition

Export

Metric	Quanta Services	ENGINRG/R&D SVS Industry	Construction Sector	NYSE Exchange
Market Cap	$98.56B	$9.63B	$9.68B	$23.55B
Dividend Yield	0.07%	1.88%	1.97%	4.01%
P/E Ratio	91.31	22.36	19.25	30.81
Price / Sales	3.51	1.85	27.30	21.17
Price / Cash	40.93	24.09	17.05	25.14
Price / Book	11.00	4.12	5.29	4.74
Net Income	$1.03B	$222.61M	$560.79M	$1.07B
7 Day Performance	-3.81%	-2.75%	-3.60%	-0.70%
1 Month Performance	-4.11%	-2.06%	-0.38%	1.64%
1 Year Performance	76.17%	27.30%	7.60%	16.02%

Quanta Services Competitors List

Export

Company	MarketRank	Share Price	Analysts' Price Target	1Y Price Performance	Market Cap	Revenue	P/E Ratio	Employee Count	Indicator(s)
PWR Quanta Services	4.6419 of 5 stars	$665.65 +1.3%	$755.18 +13.4%	+70.4%	$98.56B	$28.48B	91.31	69,500	Positive News Analyst Downgrade
MYRG MYR Group	2.5166 of 5 stars	$501.13 +4.8%	$358.17 -28.5%	+124.3%	$7.80B	$3.66B	55.25	9,000	Positive News Gap Down
ACM AECOM	4.9979 of 5 stars	$69.92 -1.5%	$116.00 +65.9%	-41.3%	$8.99B	$16.14B	18.26	51,000	Analyst Downgrade
EME EMCOR Group	4.4415 of 5 stars	$815.63 +2.2%	$871.25 +6.8%	+39.8%	$36.25B	$16.99B	27.36	44,000	Positive News Dividend Announcement
ETN Eaton	4.5663 of 5 stars	$408.24 +1.4%	$420.95 +3.1%	+10.4%	$158.52B	$27.45B	39.91	97,000

Related Companies and Tools

Related Companies

Top 10 Stock Comparisons

This page (NYSE:PWR) was last updated on 7/8/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.

From Our Partners

Unlock superior investment research and tools.

Get MarketBeat All Access

In-depth profiles and analysis for 20,000 public companies.
Real-time analyst ratings, insider transactions, earnings data, and more.
Our daily ratings and market update email newsletter.

Sign In
Create Account

Your Email Address:

Your Password:

Forgot your password?

Your Email Address:

Choose a Password:

By creating a free account, you agree to our terms of service. This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

Quanta Services (PWR) Competitors

PWR vs. MYRG, ACM, EME, ETN, and FIX

How does Quanta Services compare to MYR Group?

Summary

How does Quanta Services compare to AECOM?

Summary

How does Quanta Services compare to EMCOR Group?

Summary

How does Quanta Services compare to Eaton?

Summary

How does Quanta Services compare to Comfort Systems USA?

Summary

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

Media Sentiment Over Time

PWR vs. The Competition

Quanta Services Competitors List

Related Companies and Tools

Best-in-Class Portfolio Monitoring

Stock Ideas and Recommendations

Advanced Stock Screeners and Research Tools

About MarketBeat

MarketBeat Products

Popular Tools

Financial Calendars

Terms & Info

Quanta Services (PWR) Competitors

PWR vs. MYRG, ACM, EME, ETN, and FIX

How does Quanta Services compare to MYR Group?

Do analysts prefer MYRG or PWR?

Which has more volatility & risk, MYRG or PWR?

Is MYRG or PWR more profitable?

Which has higher valuation & earnings, MYRG or PWR?

Does the media prefer MYRG or PWR?

Do institutionals & insiders believe in MYRG or PWR?

Summary

How does Quanta Services compare to AECOM?

Is ACM or PWR a better dividend stock?

Which has preferable earnings & valuation, ACM or PWR?

Is ACM or PWR more profitable?

Do insiders & institutionals believe in ACM or PWR?

Do analysts recommend ACM or PWR?

Does the media refer more to ACM or PWR?

Which has more volatility and risk, ACM or PWR?

Summary

How does Quanta Services compare to EMCOR Group?

Which has more risk and volatility, EME or PWR?

Is EME or PWR more profitable?

Do analysts recommend EME or PWR?

Does the media favor EME or PWR?

Is EME or PWR a better dividend stock?

Which has higher earnings and valuation, EME or PWR?

Do institutionals and insiders hold more shares of EME or PWR?

Summary

How does Quanta Services compare to Eaton?

Which has more volatility and risk, PWR or ETN?

Do institutionals & insiders hold more shares of PWR or ETN?

Is PWR or ETN a better dividend stock?

Is PWR or ETN more profitable?

Does the media refer more to PWR or ETN?

Do analysts recommend PWR or ETN?

Which has stronger valuation and earnings, PWR or ETN?

Summary

How does Quanta Services compare to Comfort Systems USA?

Does the media prefer FIX or PWR?

Do analysts prefer FIX or PWR?

Which has stronger earnings & valuation, FIX or PWR?

Which has more volatility & risk, FIX or PWR?

Do institutionals and insiders hold more shares of FIX or PWR?

Is FIX or PWR a better dividend stock?

Is FIX or PWR more profitable?

Summary

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

Media Sentiment Over Time

PWR vs. The Competition

Quanta Services Competitors List

Related Companies and Tools

MarketBeat All Access Features

Best-in-Class Portfolio Monitoring

Stock Ideas and Recommendations

Advanced Stock Screeners and Research Tools