NASDAQ:MTRX

Matrix Service Competitors

$13.83

-0.49 (-3.42 %)

(As of 03/2/2021 04:31 PM ET)

Add

Compare

Today's Range

$13.82

Now: $13.83▼

$14.48

50-Day Range

$11.60

MA: $13.13▼

$15.36

52-Week Range

$7.11

Now: $13.83▼

$15.50

Volume91,777 shs

Average Volume251,649 shs

Market Capitalization$366.63 million

P/E RatioN/A

Dividend YieldN/A

Beta1.67

Matrix Service (NASDAQ:MTRX) Vs. SLB, HAL, NOV, FTI, RES, and OII

Should you be buying MTRX stock or one of its competitors? Companies in the sub-industry of "oil & gas equipment & services" are considered alternatives and competitors to Matrix Service, including Schlumberger (SLB), Halliburton (HAL), NOV (NOV), TechnipFMC (FTI), RPC (RES), and Oceaneering International (OII).

Matrix Service vs. Schlumberger Stock

Schlumberger (NYSE:SLB) and Matrix Service (NASDAQ:MTRX) are both oils/energy companies, but which is the better stock? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their dividends, earnings, profitability, institutional ownership, risk, valuation and analyst recommendations.

Profitability

This table compares Schlumberger and Matrix Service's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Schlumberger	-40.15%	7.34%	2.46%
Matrix Service	-4.47%	0.52%	0.30%

Institutional and Insider Ownership

73.2% of Schlumberger shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 92.7% of Matrix Service shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.6% of Schlumberger shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 2.8% of Matrix Service shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a breakdown of recent ratings and target prices for Schlumberger and Matrix Service, as reported by MarketBeat.com.

	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Schlumberger	3	6	17	0	2.54
Matrix Service	0	0	0	0	N/A

Schlumberger presently has a consensus target price of $23.6458, indicating a potential downside of 16.00%. Given Schlumberger's higher probable upside, research analysts clearly believe Schlumberger is more favorable than Matrix Service.

Earnings and Valuation

This table compares Schlumberger and Matrix Service's gross revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Schlumberger	$32.92 billion	1.19	$-10,137,000,000.00	$1.47	19.14
Matrix Service	$1.10 billion	0.33	$-33,070,000.00	$0.40	34.58

Matrix Service has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Schlumberger. Schlumberger is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Matrix Service, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Volatility and Risk

Schlumberger has a beta of 2.28, indicating that its share price is 128% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Matrix Service has a beta of 1.67, indicating that its share price is 67% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Summary

Schlumberger beats Matrix Service on 9 of the 13 factors compared between the two stocks.

Matrix Service vs. Halliburton Stock

Halliburton (NYSE:HAL) and Matrix Service (NASDAQ:MTRX) are both oils/energy companies, but which is the better business? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their profitability, institutional ownership, valuation, dividends, risk, analyst recommendations and earnings.

Institutional and Insider Ownership

75.4% of Halliburton shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 92.7% of Matrix Service shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.5% of Halliburton shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 2.8% of Matrix Service shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Risk and Volatility

Halliburton has a beta of 2.81, indicating that its stock price is 181% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Matrix Service has a beta of 1.67, indicating that its stock price is 67% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a summary of current ratings and recommmendations for Halliburton and Matrix Service, as reported by MarketBeat.

	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Halliburton	3	11	10	2	2.42
Matrix Service	0	0	0	0	N/A

Halliburton presently has a consensus target price of $16.8190, suggesting a potential downside of 24.48%. Given Halliburton's higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Halliburton is more favorable than Matrix Service.

Earnings and Valuation

This table compares Halliburton and Matrix Service's gross revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Halliburton	$22.41 billion	0.88	$-1,131,000,000.00	$1.24	17.97
Matrix Service	$1.10 billion	0.33	$-33,070,000.00	$0.40	34.58

Matrix Service has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Halliburton. Halliburton is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Matrix Service, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Profitability

This table compares Halliburton and Matrix Service's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Halliburton	-26.60%	11.10%	3.08%
Matrix Service	-4.47%	0.52%	0.30%

Summary

Halliburton beats Matrix Service on 10 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

Matrix Service vs. NOV Stock

NOV (NYSE:NOV) and Matrix Service (NASDAQ:MTRX) are both business services companies, but which is the superior stock? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their institutional ownership, analyst recommendations, dividends, profitability, valuation, risk and earnings.

Risk and Volatility

NOV has a beta of 2.22, indicating that its stock price is 122% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Matrix Service has a beta of 1.67, indicating that its stock price is 67% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Analyst Ratings

This is a summary of current ratings and target prices for NOV and Matrix Service, as reported by MarketBeat.

	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
NOV	2	8	11	0	2.43
Matrix Service	0	0	0	0	N/A

NOV presently has a consensus price target of $13.6059, indicating a potential downside of 9.35%. Given NOV's higher probable upside, equities analysts clearly believe NOV is more favorable than Matrix Service.

Profitability

This table compares NOV and Matrix Service's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
NOV	-36.63%	1.13%	0.62%
Matrix Service	-4.47%	0.52%	0.30%

Valuation and Earnings

This table compares NOV and Matrix Service's top-line revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
NOV	$8.48 billion	0.69	$-6,095,000,000.00	($0.72)	-20.83
Matrix Service	$1.10 billion	0.33	$-33,070,000.00	$0.40	34.58

Matrix Service has lower revenue, but higher earnings than NOV. NOV is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Matrix Service, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Insider and Institutional Ownership

94.5% of NOV shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 92.7% of Matrix Service shares are held by institutional investors. 0.9% of NOV shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 2.8% of Matrix Service shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Summary

NOV beats Matrix Service on 9 of the 13 factors compared between the two stocks.

Matrix Service vs. TechnipFMC Stock

Matrix Service (NASDAQ:MTRX) and TechnipFMC (NYSE:FTI) are both oils/energy companies, but which is the better business? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their risk, analyst recommendations, valuation, institutional ownership, earnings, profitability and dividends.

Profitability

This table compares Matrix Service and TechnipFMC's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Matrix Service	-4.47%	0.52%	0.30%
TechnipFMC	-42.41%	1.56%	0.38%

Earnings & Valuation

This table compares Matrix Service and TechnipFMC's revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Matrix Service	$1.10 billion	0.33	$-33,070,000.00	$0.40	34.58
TechnipFMC	$13.41 billion	0.28	$-2,415,200,000.00	$0.74	11.42

Matrix Service has higher earnings, but lower revenue than TechnipFMC. TechnipFMC is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Matrix Service, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a summary of current recommendations and price targets for Matrix Service and TechnipFMC, as reported by MarketBeat.

	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Matrix Service	0	0	0	0	N/A
TechnipFMC	0	12	9	0	2.43

TechnipFMC has a consensus target price of $10.0536, indicating a potential upside of 18.84%. Given TechnipFMC's higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe TechnipFMC is more favorable than Matrix Service.

Institutional and Insider Ownership

92.7% of Matrix Service shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 77.5% of TechnipFMC shares are owned by institutional investors. 2.8% of Matrix Service shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 0.5% of TechnipFMC shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Risk & Volatility

Matrix Service has a beta of 1.67, indicating that its share price is 67% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, TechnipFMC has a beta of 2.38, indicating that its share price is 138% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Summary

TechnipFMC beats Matrix Service on 8 of the 13 factors compared between the two stocks.

Matrix Service vs. RPC Stock

RPC (NYSE:RES) and Matrix Service (NASDAQ:MTRX) are both small-cap oils/energy companies, but which is the better business? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their profitability, earnings, risk, valuation, institutional ownership, dividends and analyst recommendations.

Insider and Institutional Ownership

25.7% of RPC shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 92.7% of Matrix Service shares are owned by institutional investors. 73.6% of RPC shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 2.8% of Matrix Service shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Risk & Volatility

RPC has a beta of 2.13, indicating that its share price is 113% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Matrix Service has a beta of 1.67, indicating that its share price is 67% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Analyst Ratings

This is a breakdown of recent recommendations and price targets for RPC and Matrix Service, as provided by MarketBeat.com.

	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
RPC	2	3	1	0	1.83
Matrix Service	0	0	0	0	N/A

RPC presently has a consensus target price of $3.1786, indicating a potential downside of 47.81%. Given RPC's higher possible upside, equities research analysts plainly believe RPC is more favorable than Matrix Service.

Earnings and Valuation

This table compares RPC and Matrix Service's gross revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
RPC	$1.22 billion	1.07	$-87,110,000.00	($0.12)	-50.75
Matrix Service	$1.10 billion	0.33	$-33,070,000.00	$0.40	34.58

Matrix Service has lower revenue, but higher earnings than RPC. RPC is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Matrix Service, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Profitability

This table compares RPC and Matrix Service's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
RPC	-32.86%	-9.35%	-7.44%
Matrix Service	-4.47%	0.52%	0.30%

Summary

RPC beats Matrix Service on 7 of the 13 factors compared between the two stocks.

Matrix Service vs. Oceaneering International Stock

Oceaneering International (NYSE:OII) and Matrix Service (NASDAQ:MTRX) are both small-cap oils/energy companies, but which is the better stock? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their institutional ownership, analyst recommendations, risk, earnings, dividends, valuation and profitability.

Valuation and Earnings

This table compares Oceaneering International and Matrix Service's top-line revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Oceaneering International	$2.05 billion	0.60	$-348,440,000.00	($0.82)	-15.05
Matrix Service	$1.10 billion	0.33	$-33,070,000.00	$0.40	34.58

Matrix Service has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Oceaneering International. Oceaneering International is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Matrix Service, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Profitability

This table compares Oceaneering International and Matrix Service's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Oceaneering International	-37.40%	-3.56%	-1.14%
Matrix Service	-4.47%	0.52%	0.30%

Insider & Institutional Ownership

83.4% of Oceaneering International shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 92.7% of Matrix Service shares are held by institutional investors. 1.8% of Oceaneering International shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 2.8% of Matrix Service shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a breakdown of current ratings for Oceaneering International and Matrix Service, as reported by MarketBeat.

	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Oceaneering International	0	9	2	0	2.18
Matrix Service	0	0	0	0	N/A

Oceaneering International presently has a consensus target price of $7.9750, suggesting a potential downside of 35.37%. Given Oceaneering International's higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Oceaneering International is more favorable than Matrix Service.

Risk & Volatility

Oceaneering International has a beta of 3.6, suggesting that its stock price is 260% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Matrix Service has a beta of 1.67, suggesting that its stock price is 67% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Summary

Matrix Service beats Oceaneering International on 7 of the 13 factors compared between the two stocks.