S&P 500   3,870.29 (-0.81%)
DOW   31,391.52 (-0.46%)
QQQ   318.40 (-1.60%)
AAPL   125.12 (-2.09%)
MSFT   233.87 (-1.30%)
FB   259.00 (-2.23%)
GOOGL   2,064.48 (-0.25%)
TSLA   686.44 (-4.45%)
AMZN   3,094.53 (-1.64%)
NVDA   536.25 (-3.15%)
BABA   234.42 (-3.01%)
CGC   35.25 (+1.50%)
GE   12.98 (-0.99%)
MU   91.09 (-3.87%)
NIO   43.29 (-13.00%)
AMD   84.13 (-2.62%)
T   28.22 (+0.46%)
F   12.55 (+4.76%)
ACB   11.03 (-0.09%)
DIS   193.94 (-0.53%)
BA   223.14 (-0.56%)
NFLX   547.82 (-0.51%)
BAC   35.53 (-0.73%)
S&P 500   3,870.29 (-0.81%)
DOW   31,391.52 (-0.46%)
QQQ   318.40 (-1.60%)
AAPL   125.12 (-2.09%)
MSFT   233.87 (-1.30%)
FB   259.00 (-2.23%)
GOOGL   2,064.48 (-0.25%)
TSLA   686.44 (-4.45%)
AMZN   3,094.53 (-1.64%)
NVDA   536.25 (-3.15%)
BABA   234.42 (-3.01%)
CGC   35.25 (+1.50%)
GE   12.98 (-0.99%)
MU   91.09 (-3.87%)
NIO   43.29 (-13.00%)
AMD   84.13 (-2.62%)
T   28.22 (+0.46%)
F   12.55 (+4.76%)
ACB   11.03 (-0.09%)
DIS   193.94 (-0.53%)
BA   223.14 (-0.56%)
NFLX   547.82 (-0.51%)
BAC   35.53 (-0.73%)
S&P 500   3,870.29 (-0.81%)
DOW   31,391.52 (-0.46%)
QQQ   318.40 (-1.60%)
AAPL   125.12 (-2.09%)
MSFT   233.87 (-1.30%)
FB   259.00 (-2.23%)
GOOGL   2,064.48 (-0.25%)
TSLA   686.44 (-4.45%)
AMZN   3,094.53 (-1.64%)
NVDA   536.25 (-3.15%)
BABA   234.42 (-3.01%)
CGC   35.25 (+1.50%)
GE   12.98 (-0.99%)
MU   91.09 (-3.87%)
NIO   43.29 (-13.00%)
AMD   84.13 (-2.62%)
T   28.22 (+0.46%)
F   12.55 (+4.76%)
ACB   11.03 (-0.09%)
DIS   193.94 (-0.53%)
BA   223.14 (-0.56%)
NFLX   547.82 (-0.51%)
BAC   35.53 (-0.73%)
S&P 500   3,870.29 (-0.81%)
DOW   31,391.52 (-0.46%)
QQQ   318.40 (-1.60%)
AAPL   125.12 (-2.09%)
MSFT   233.87 (-1.30%)
FB   259.00 (-2.23%)
GOOGL   2,064.48 (-0.25%)
TSLA   686.44 (-4.45%)
AMZN   3,094.53 (-1.64%)
NVDA   536.25 (-3.15%)
BABA   234.42 (-3.01%)
CGC   35.25 (+1.50%)
GE   12.98 (-0.99%)
MU   91.09 (-3.87%)
NIO   43.29 (-13.00%)
AMD   84.13 (-2.62%)
T   28.22 (+0.46%)
F   12.55 (+4.76%)
ACB   11.03 (-0.09%)
DIS   193.94 (-0.53%)
BA   223.14 (-0.56%)
NFLX   547.82 (-0.51%)
BAC   35.53 (-0.73%)
Log in
NASDAQ:MTRX

Matrix Service Competitors

$13.83
-0.49 (-3.42 %)
(As of 03/2/2021 04:31 PM ET)
Add
Compare
Today's Range
$13.82
Now: $13.83
$14.48
50-Day Range
$11.60
MA: $13.13
$15.36
52-Week Range
$7.11
Now: $13.83
$15.50
Volume91,777 shs
Average Volume251,649 shs
Market Capitalization$366.63 million
P/E RatioN/A
Dividend YieldN/A
Beta1.67

Competitors

Matrix Service (NASDAQ:MTRX) Vs. SLB, HAL, NOV, FTI, RES, and OII

Should you be buying MTRX stock or one of its competitors? Companies in the sub-industry of "oil & gas equipment & services" are considered alternatives and competitors to Matrix Service, including Schlumberger (SLB), Halliburton (HAL), NOV (NOV), TechnipFMC (FTI), RPC (RES), and Oceaneering International (OII).

Schlumberger (NYSE:SLB) and Matrix Service (NASDAQ:MTRX) are both oils/energy companies, but which is the better stock? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their dividends, earnings, profitability, institutional ownership, risk, valuation and analyst recommendations.

Profitability

This table compares Schlumberger and Matrix Service's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Net MarginsReturn on EquityReturn on Assets
Schlumberger-40.15%7.34%2.46%
Matrix Service-4.47%0.52%0.30%

Institutional and Insider Ownership

73.2% of Schlumberger shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 92.7% of Matrix Service shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.6% of Schlumberger shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 2.8% of Matrix Service shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a breakdown of recent ratings and target prices for Schlumberger and Matrix Service, as reported by MarketBeat.com.

Sell RatingsHold RatingsBuy RatingsStrong Buy RatingsRating Score
Schlumberger361702.54
Matrix Service0000N/A

Schlumberger presently has a consensus target price of $23.6458, indicating a potential downside of 16.00%. Given Schlumberger's higher probable upside, research analysts clearly believe Schlumberger is more favorable than Matrix Service.

Earnings and Valuation

This table compares Schlumberger and Matrix Service's gross revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

Gross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Schlumberger$32.92 billion1.19$-10,137,000,000.00$1.4719.14
Matrix Service$1.10 billion0.33$-33,070,000.00$0.4034.58

Matrix Service has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Schlumberger. Schlumberger is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Matrix Service, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Volatility and Risk

Schlumberger has a beta of 2.28, indicating that its share price is 128% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Matrix Service has a beta of 1.67, indicating that its share price is 67% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Summary

Schlumberger beats Matrix Service on 9 of the 13 factors compared between the two stocks.

Halliburton (NYSE:HAL) and Matrix Service (NASDAQ:MTRX) are both oils/energy companies, but which is the better business? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their profitability, institutional ownership, valuation, dividends, risk, analyst recommendations and earnings.

Institutional and Insider Ownership

75.4% of Halliburton shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 92.7% of Matrix Service shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.5% of Halliburton shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 2.8% of Matrix Service shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Risk and Volatility

Halliburton has a beta of 2.81, indicating that its stock price is 181% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Matrix Service has a beta of 1.67, indicating that its stock price is 67% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a summary of current ratings and recommmendations for Halliburton and Matrix Service, as reported by MarketBeat.

Sell RatingsHold RatingsBuy RatingsStrong Buy RatingsRating Score
Halliburton3111022.42
Matrix Service0000N/A

Halliburton presently has a consensus target price of $16.8190, suggesting a potential downside of 24.48%. Given Halliburton's higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Halliburton is more favorable than Matrix Service.

Earnings and Valuation

This table compares Halliburton and Matrix Service's gross revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

Gross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Halliburton$22.41 billion0.88$-1,131,000,000.00$1.2417.97
Matrix Service$1.10 billion0.33$-33,070,000.00$0.4034.58

Matrix Service has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Halliburton. Halliburton is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Matrix Service, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Profitability

This table compares Halliburton and Matrix Service's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Net MarginsReturn on EquityReturn on Assets
Halliburton-26.60%11.10%3.08%
Matrix Service-4.47%0.52%0.30%

Summary

Halliburton beats Matrix Service on 10 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

NOV (NYSE:NOV) and Matrix Service (NASDAQ:MTRX) are both business services companies, but which is the superior stock? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their institutional ownership, analyst recommendations, dividends, profitability, valuation, risk and earnings.

Risk and Volatility

NOV has a beta of 2.22, indicating that its stock price is 122% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Matrix Service has a beta of 1.67, indicating that its stock price is 67% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Analyst Ratings

This is a summary of current ratings and target prices for NOV and Matrix Service, as reported by MarketBeat.

Sell RatingsHold RatingsBuy RatingsStrong Buy RatingsRating Score
NOV281102.43
Matrix Service0000N/A

NOV presently has a consensus price target of $13.6059, indicating a potential downside of 9.35%. Given NOV's higher probable upside, equities analysts clearly believe NOV is more favorable than Matrix Service.

Profitability

This table compares NOV and Matrix Service's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Net MarginsReturn on EquityReturn on Assets
NOV-36.63%1.13%0.62%
Matrix Service-4.47%0.52%0.30%

Valuation and Earnings

This table compares NOV and Matrix Service's top-line revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

Gross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
NOV$8.48 billion0.69$-6,095,000,000.00($0.72)-20.83
Matrix Service$1.10 billion0.33$-33,070,000.00$0.4034.58

Matrix Service has lower revenue, but higher earnings than NOV. NOV is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Matrix Service, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Insider and Institutional Ownership

94.5% of NOV shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 92.7% of Matrix Service shares are held by institutional investors. 0.9% of NOV shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 2.8% of Matrix Service shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Summary

NOV beats Matrix Service on 9 of the 13 factors compared between the two stocks.

Matrix Service (NASDAQ:MTRX) and TechnipFMC (NYSE:FTI) are both oils/energy companies, but which is the better business? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their risk, analyst recommendations, valuation, institutional ownership, earnings, profitability and dividends.

Profitability

This table compares Matrix Service and TechnipFMC's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Net MarginsReturn on EquityReturn on Assets
Matrix Service-4.47%0.52%0.30%
TechnipFMC-42.41%1.56%0.38%

Earnings & Valuation

This table compares Matrix Service and TechnipFMC's revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

Gross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Matrix Service$1.10 billion0.33$-33,070,000.00$0.4034.58
TechnipFMC$13.41 billion0.28$-2,415,200,000.00$0.7411.42

Matrix Service has higher earnings, but lower revenue than TechnipFMC. TechnipFMC is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Matrix Service, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a summary of current recommendations and price targets for Matrix Service and TechnipFMC, as reported by MarketBeat.

Sell RatingsHold RatingsBuy RatingsStrong Buy RatingsRating Score
Matrix Service0000N/A
TechnipFMC012902.43

TechnipFMC has a consensus target price of $10.0536, indicating a potential upside of 18.84%. Given TechnipFMC's higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe TechnipFMC is more favorable than Matrix Service.

Institutional and Insider Ownership

92.7% of Matrix Service shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 77.5% of TechnipFMC shares are owned by institutional investors. 2.8% of Matrix Service shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 0.5% of TechnipFMC shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Risk & Volatility

Matrix Service has a beta of 1.67, indicating that its share price is 67% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, TechnipFMC has a beta of 2.38, indicating that its share price is 138% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Summary

TechnipFMC beats Matrix Service on 8 of the 13 factors compared between the two stocks.

RPC (NYSE:RES) and Matrix Service (NASDAQ:MTRX) are both small-cap oils/energy companies, but which is the better business? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their profitability, earnings, risk, valuation, institutional ownership, dividends and analyst recommendations.

Insider and Institutional Ownership

25.7% of RPC shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 92.7% of Matrix Service shares are owned by institutional investors. 73.6% of RPC shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 2.8% of Matrix Service shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Risk & Volatility

RPC has a beta of 2.13, indicating that its share price is 113% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Matrix Service has a beta of 1.67, indicating that its share price is 67% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Analyst Ratings

This is a breakdown of recent recommendations and price targets for RPC and Matrix Service, as provided by MarketBeat.com.

Sell RatingsHold RatingsBuy RatingsStrong Buy RatingsRating Score
RPC23101.83
Matrix Service0000N/A

RPC presently has a consensus target price of $3.1786, indicating a potential downside of 47.81%. Given RPC's higher possible upside, equities research analysts plainly believe RPC is more favorable than Matrix Service.

Earnings and Valuation

This table compares RPC and Matrix Service's gross revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

Gross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
RPC$1.22 billion1.07$-87,110,000.00($0.12)-50.75
Matrix Service$1.10 billion0.33$-33,070,000.00$0.4034.58

Matrix Service has lower revenue, but higher earnings than RPC. RPC is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Matrix Service, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Profitability

This table compares RPC and Matrix Service's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Net MarginsReturn on EquityReturn on Assets
RPC-32.86%-9.35%-7.44%
Matrix Service-4.47%0.52%0.30%

Summary

RPC beats Matrix Service on 7 of the 13 factors compared between the two stocks.

Oceaneering International (NYSE:OII) and Matrix Service (NASDAQ:MTRX) are both small-cap oils/energy companies, but which is the better stock? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their institutional ownership, analyst recommendations, risk, earnings, dividends, valuation and profitability.

Valuation and Earnings

This table compares Oceaneering International and Matrix Service's top-line revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

Gross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Oceaneering International$2.05 billion0.60$-348,440,000.00($0.82)-15.05
Matrix Service$1.10 billion0.33$-33,070,000.00$0.4034.58

Matrix Service has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Oceaneering International. Oceaneering International is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Matrix Service, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Profitability

This table compares Oceaneering International and Matrix Service's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Net MarginsReturn on EquityReturn on Assets
Oceaneering International-37.40%-3.56%-1.14%
Matrix Service-4.47%0.52%0.30%

Insider & Institutional Ownership

83.4% of Oceaneering International shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 92.7% of Matrix Service shares are held by institutional investors. 1.8% of Oceaneering International shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 2.8% of Matrix Service shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a breakdown of current ratings for Oceaneering International and Matrix Service, as reported by MarketBeat.

Sell RatingsHold RatingsBuy RatingsStrong Buy RatingsRating Score
Oceaneering International09202.18
Matrix Service0000N/A

Oceaneering International presently has a consensus target price of $7.9750, suggesting a potential downside of 35.37%. Given Oceaneering International's higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Oceaneering International is more favorable than Matrix Service.

Risk & Volatility

Oceaneering International has a beta of 3.6, suggesting that its stock price is 260% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Matrix Service has a beta of 1.67, suggesting that its stock price is 67% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Summary

Matrix Service beats Oceaneering International on 7 of the 13 factors compared between the two stocks.


Matrix Service Competitors List

Competitor NameCompetitor BTM RankCompetitor PriceCompetitor Price ChangeCompetitor Market CapCompetitor RevenueCompetitor P/E RatioCompetitor Indicator(s)
Schlumberger logo
SLB
Schlumberger
2.3$28.14-2.1%$39.99 billion$32.92 billion-3.70Analyst Report
Halliburton logo
HAL
Halliburton
2.2$22.28-3.3%$20.45 billion$22.41 billion-4.48
NOV logo
NOV
NOV
1.4$15.00-4.3%$6.07 billion$8.48 billion-2.23
TechnipFMC logo
FTI
TechnipFMC
2.1$8.45-0.4%$3.77 billion$13.41 billion-0.67Earnings Announcement
Analyst Downgrade
Increase in Short Interest
RPC logo
RES
RPC
1.2$6.09-5.9%$1.39 billion$1.22 billion-5.69News Coverage
Gap Down
Oceaneering International logo
OII
Oceaneering International
1.0$12.34-4.0%$1.27 billion$2.05 billion-1.66Earnings Announcement
Analyst Report
Dril-Quip logo
DRQ
Dril-Quip
0.6$33.55-7.9%$1.27 billion$414.81 million-101.66Earnings Announcement
Analyst Revision
News Coverage
Seacor logo
CKH
Seacor
1.4$42.28-0.5%$865.81 million$799.97 million81.31Increase in Short Interest
News Coverage
Helix Energy Solutions Group logo
HLX
Helix Energy Solutions Group
1.3$4.99-5.6%$791.35 million$751.91 million31.19Analyst Downgrade
Tidewater logo
TDW
Tidewater
0.9$13.19-2.7%$520.62 million$486.55 million-2.33Analyst Upgrade
Gap Down
Oil States International logo
OIS
Oil States International
1.2$7.88-1.3%$487.12 million$1.02 billion-0.75
Newpark Resources logo
NR
Newpark Resources
1.3$3.85-1.8%$355.95 million$820.12 million-4.38
TETRA Technologies logo
TTI
TETRA Technologies
0.9$2.57-2.3%$316.20 million$1.04 billion-2.20Earnings Announcement
Increase in Short Interest
RigNet logo
RNET
RigNet
0.8$9.56-0.5%$197.58 million$242.93 million-5.22Upcoming Earnings
Geospace Technologies logo
GEOS
Geospace Technologies
0.7$10.34-0.6%$141.33 million$87.83 million-7.23Gap Down
Natural Gas Services Group logo
NGS
Natural Gas Services Group
1.6$10.00-1.6%$136.85 million$78.44 million71.43Increase in Short Interest
Forum Energy Technologies logo
FET
Forum Energy Technologies
0.8$21.10-7.7%$126.69 million$956.50 million-1.55Gap Down
Dawson Geophysical logo
DWSN
Dawson Geophysical
0.7$3.04-7.9%$71.37 million$145.77 million-6.33Decrease in Short Interest
Gap Down
Gulf Island Fabrication logo
GIFI
Gulf Island Fabrication
0.8$4.00-1.0%$60.69 million$303.31 million-1.32Upcoming Earnings
Gap Up
ION Geophysical logo
IO
ION Geophysical
1.1$3.12-0.0%$46.73 million$174.68 million-1.15Unusual Options Activity
This page was last updated on 3/2/2021 by MarketBeat.com Staff

Enter your email address below to receive a concise daily summary of analysts' upgrades, downgrades and new coverage with MarketBeat.com's FREE daily email newsletter.