Matrix Service (MTRX) Competitors

In the previous week, Matrix Service had 6 more articles in the media than Great Lakes Dredge & Dock. MarketBeat recorded 9 mentions for Matrix Service and 3 mentions for Great Lakes Dredge & Dock. Great Lakes Dredge & Dock's average media sentiment score of 1.26 beat Matrix Service's score of 0.51 indicating that Great Lakes Dredge & Dock is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Great Lakes Dredge & Dock has higher revenue and earnings than Matrix Service. Matrix Service is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Great Lakes Dredge & Dock, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Matrix Service presently has a consensus price target of $20.50, suggesting a potential upside of 47.16%. Great Lakes Dredge & Dock has a consensus price target of $17.00, suggesting a potential upside of 0.00%. Given Matrix Service's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, equities analysts clearly believe Matrix Service is more favorable than Great Lakes Dredge & Dock.

Great Lakes Dredge & Dock has a net margin of 8.27% compared to Matrix Service's net margin of -2.30%. Great Lakes Dredge & Dock's return on equity of 16.46% beat Matrix Service's return on equity.

78.4% of Matrix Service shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 89.1% of Great Lakes Dredge & Dock shares are held by institutional investors. 4.4% of Matrix Service shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 2.2% of Great Lakes Dredge & Dock shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Matrix Service has a beta of 1.02, indicating that its stock price is 2% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Great Lakes Dredge & Dock has a beta of 1.38, indicating that its stock price is 38% more volatile than the S&P 500.

78.4% of Matrix Service shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 80.6% of NWPX Infrastructure shares are held by institutional investors. 4.4% of Matrix Service shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 3.2% of NWPX Infrastructure shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

In the previous week, NWPX Infrastructure had 39 more articles in the media than Matrix Service. MarketBeat recorded 48 mentions for NWPX Infrastructure and 9 mentions for Matrix Service. NWPX Infrastructure's average media sentiment score of 0.74 beat Matrix Service's score of 0.51 indicating that NWPX Infrastructure is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

NWPX Infrastructure has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Matrix Service. Matrix Service is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than NWPX Infrastructure, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Matrix Service presently has a consensus price target of $20.50, suggesting a potential upside of 47.16%. NWPX Infrastructure has a consensus price target of $90.00, suggesting a potential downside of 19.22%. Given Matrix Service's higher probable upside, equities analysts clearly believe Matrix Service is more favorable than NWPX Infrastructure.

NWPX Infrastructure has a net margin of 7.66% compared to Matrix Service's net margin of -2.30%. NWPX Infrastructure's return on equity of 10.80% beat Matrix Service's return on equity.

Matrix Service has a beta of 1.02, indicating that its stock price is 2% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, NWPX Infrastructure has a beta of 1.06, indicating that its stock price is 6% more volatile than the S&P 500.

70.3% of Orion Group shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 78.4% of Matrix Service shares are held by institutional investors. 5.7% of Orion Group shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 4.4% of Matrix Service shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Orion Group currently has a consensus target price of $16.25, indicating a potential upside of 5.18%. Matrix Service has a consensus target price of $20.50, indicating a potential upside of 47.16%. Given Matrix Service's higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Matrix Service is more favorable than Orion Group.

Orion Group has a net margin of 0.98% compared to Matrix Service's net margin of -2.30%. Orion Group's return on equity of 4.44% beat Matrix Service's return on equity.

Orion Group has higher revenue and earnings than Matrix Service. Matrix Service is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Orion Group, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Orion Group has a beta of 1.39, meaning that its stock price is 39% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Matrix Service has a beta of 1.02, meaning that its stock price is 2% more volatile than the S&P 500.

In the previous week, Orion Group had 5 more articles in the media than Matrix Service. MarketBeat recorded 14 mentions for Orion Group and 9 mentions for Matrix Service. Orion Group's average media sentiment score of 0.51 beat Matrix Service's score of 0.51 indicating that Orion Group is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Quanta Services presently has a consensus target price of $695.73, suggesting a potential downside of 9.81%. Matrix Service has a consensus target price of $20.50, suggesting a potential upside of 47.16%. Given Matrix Service's higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Matrix Service is more favorable than Quanta Services.

90.5% of Quanta Services shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 78.4% of Matrix Service shares are held by institutional investors. 0.6% of Quanta Services shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 4.4% of Matrix Service shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Quanta Services has a beta of 1.24, meaning that its stock price is 24% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Matrix Service has a beta of 1.02, meaning that its stock price is 2% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Quanta Services has a net margin of 3.67% compared to Matrix Service's net margin of -2.30%. Quanta Services' return on equity of 18.64% beat Matrix Service's return on equity.

Quanta Services has higher revenue and earnings than Matrix Service. Matrix Service is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Quanta Services, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

In the previous week, Quanta Services had 62 more articles in the media than Matrix Service. MarketBeat recorded 71 mentions for Quanta Services and 9 mentions for Matrix Service. Quanta Services' average media sentiment score of 1.02 beat Matrix Service's score of 0.51 indicating that Quanta Services is being referred to more favorably in the media.