Waste Management (WM) Competitors

Waste Management presently has a consensus target price of $258.89, suggesting a potential upside of 25.76%. Republic Services has a consensus target price of $245.26, suggesting a potential upside of 16.02%. Given Waste Management's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, equities research analysts clearly believe Waste Management is more favorable than Republic Services.

80.4% of Waste Management shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 57.7% of Republic Services shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.2% of Waste Management shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 0.1% of Republic Services shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Waste Management pays an annual dividend of $3.78 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.8%. Republic Services pays an annual dividend of $2.50 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.2%. Waste Management pays out 53.5% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Republic Services pays out 35.4% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Waste Management has raised its dividend for 22 consecutive years and Republic Services has raised its dividend for 22 consecutive years.

In the previous week, Waste Management had 8 more articles in the media than Republic Services. MarketBeat recorded 14 mentions for Waste Management and 6 mentions for Republic Services. Republic Services' average media sentiment score of 0.92 beat Waste Management's score of -0.22 indicating that Republic Services is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Republic Services has a net margin of 12.94% compared to Waste Management's net margin of 11.11%. Waste Management's return on equity of 31.68% beat Republic Services' return on equity.

Waste Management has higher revenue and earnings than Republic Services. Waste Management is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Republic Services, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Waste Management has a beta of 0.42, meaning that its stock price is 58% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Republic Services has a beta of 0.4, meaning that its stock price is 60% less volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, Waste Management had 14 more articles in the media than Waste Connections. MarketBeat recorded 14 mentions for Waste Management and 0 mentions for Waste Connections. Waste Connections' average media sentiment score of 0.84 beat Waste Management's score of -0.22 indicating that Waste Connections is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Waste Management has a beta of 0.42, meaning that its share price is 58% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Waste Connections has a beta of 0.48, meaning that its share price is 52% less volatile than the broader market.

Waste Management has higher revenue and earnings than Waste Connections. Waste Management is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Waste Connections, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Waste Management presently has a consensus target price of $258.89, suggesting a potential upside of 25.76%. Waste Connections has a consensus target price of $202.42, suggesting a potential upside of 30.46%. Given Waste Connections' stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Waste Connections is more favorable than Waste Management.

Waste Management has a net margin of 11.11% compared to Waste Connections' net margin of 10.86%. Waste Management's return on equity of 31.68% beat Waste Connections' return on equity.

Waste Management pays an annual dividend of $3.78 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.8%. Waste Connections pays an annual dividend of $1.40 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.9%. Waste Management pays out 53.5% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Waste Connections pays out 33.7% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Waste Management has raised its dividend for 22 consecutive years and Waste Connections has raised its dividend for 8 consecutive years. Waste Management is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

80.4% of Waste Management shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 86.1% of Waste Connections shares are held by institutional investors. 0.2% of Waste Management shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.3% of Waste Connections shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

In the previous week, Rollins had 15 more articles in the media than Waste Management. MarketBeat recorded 29 mentions for Rollins and 14 mentions for Waste Management. Rollins' average media sentiment score of 0.31 beat Waste Management's score of -0.22 indicating that Rollins is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Waste Management presently has a consensus target price of $258.89, indicating a potential upside of 25.76%. Rollins has a consensus target price of $45.94, indicating a potential upside of 52.56%. Given Rollins' higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Rollins is more favorable than Waste Management.

Waste Management has higher revenue and earnings than Rollins. Rollins is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Waste Management, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Waste Management pays an annual dividend of $3.78 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.8%. Rollins pays an annual dividend of $0.73 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.4%. Waste Management pays out 53.5% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Rollins pays out 66.4% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Waste Management has raised its dividend for 22 consecutive years and Rollins has raised its dividend for 4 consecutive years.

80.4% of Waste Management shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 51.8% of Rollins shares are held by institutional investors. 0.2% of Waste Management shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 5.8% of Rollins shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Rollins has a net margin of 13.55% compared to Waste Management's net margin of 11.11%. Rollins' return on equity of 38.81% beat Waste Management's return on equity.

Waste Management has a beta of 0.42, suggesting that its share price is 58% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Rollins has a beta of 0.74, suggesting that its share price is 26% less volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, Waste Management had 5 more articles in the media than GFL Environmental. MarketBeat recorded 14 mentions for Waste Management and 9 mentions for GFL Environmental. GFL Environmental's average media sentiment score of 0.30 beat Waste Management's score of -0.22 indicating that GFL Environmental is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Waste Management has a net margin of 11.11% compared to GFL Environmental's net margin of -3.28%. Waste Management's return on equity of 31.68% beat GFL Environmental's return on equity.

64.7% of GFL Environmental shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 80.4% of Waste Management shares are owned by institutional investors. 8.7% of GFL Environmental shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 0.2% of Waste Management shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

GFL Environmental currently has a consensus target price of $57.60, suggesting a potential upside of 37.59%. Waste Management has a consensus target price of $258.89, suggesting a potential upside of 25.76%. Given GFL Environmental's higher probable upside, equities analysts clearly believe GFL Environmental is more favorable than Waste Management.

GFL Environmental has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Waste Management. GFL Environmental is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Waste Management, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

GFL Environmental has a beta of 0.68, indicating that its share price is 32% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Waste Management has a beta of 0.42, indicating that its share price is 58% less volatile than the broader market.

GFL Environmental pays an annual dividend of $0.07 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.2%. Waste Management pays an annual dividend of $3.78 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.8%. GFL Environmental pays out -13.2% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Waste Management pays out 53.5% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. GFL Environmental has increased its dividend for 5 consecutive years and Waste Management has increased its dividend for 22 consecutive years. Waste Management is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.