Does the media prefer CLH or WM?

In the previous week, Waste Management had 36 more articles in the media than Clean Harbors. MarketBeat recorded 57 mentions for Waste Management and 21 mentions for Clean Harbors. Clean Harbors' average media sentiment score of 1.28 beat Waste Management's score of 0.71 indicating that Clean Harbors is being referred to more favorably in the media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment Clean Harbors 13 Very Positive mention(s) 1 Positive mention(s) 0 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive Waste Management 31 Very Positive mention(s) 15 Positive mention(s) 2 Neutral mention(s) 4 Negative mention(s) 5 Very Negative mention(s) Positive

Does the media refer more to WM or RSG?

In the previous week, Waste Management had 25 more articles in the media than Republic Services. MarketBeat recorded 57 mentions for Waste Management and 32 mentions for Republic Services. Republic Services' average media sentiment score of 1.56 beat Waste Management's score of 0.71 indicating that Republic Services is being referred to more favorably in the news media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment Waste Management 31 Very Positive mention(s) 15 Positive mention(s) 2 Neutral mention(s) 4 Negative mention(s) 5 Very Negative mention(s) Positive Republic Services 23 Very Positive mention(s) 3 Positive mention(s) 2 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Very Positive

Does the media prefer WCN or WM?

In the previous week, Waste Management had 41 more articles in the media than Waste Connections. MarketBeat recorded 57 mentions for Waste Management and 16 mentions for Waste Connections. Waste Connections' average media sentiment score of 1.19 beat Waste Management's score of 0.71 indicating that Waste Connections is being referred to more favorably in the media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment Waste Connections 15 Very Positive mention(s) 1 Positive mention(s) 0 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive Waste Management 31 Very Positive mention(s) 15 Positive mention(s) 2 Neutral mention(s) 4 Negative mention(s) 5 Very Negative mention(s) Positive

Which has preferable valuation & earnings, ROL or WM?

Waste Management has higher revenue and earnings than Rollins. Waste Management is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Rollins, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks. Company Gross Revenue Price/Sales Ratio Net Income Earnings Per Share Price/Earnings Ratio Rollins $3.76B 4.64 $526.71M $1.10 32.97 Waste Management $25.20B 3.57 $2.71B $7.06 31.88

Is ROL or WM more profitable?

Rollins has a net margin of 13.55% compared to Waste Management's net margin of 11.11%. Rollins' return on equity of 38.81% beat Waste Management's return on equity. Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets Rollins 13.55% 38.81% 17.24% Waste Management 11.11% 31.68% 6.81%

Does the media favor ROL or WM?

In the previous week, Waste Management had 39 more articles in the media than Rollins. MarketBeat recorded 57 mentions for Waste Management and 18 mentions for Rollins. Rollins' average media sentiment score of 0.75 beat Waste Management's score of 0.71 indicating that Rollins is being referred to more favorably in the media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment Rollins 10 Very Positive mention(s) 2 Positive mention(s) 5 Neutral mention(s) 1 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive Waste Management 31 Very Positive mention(s) 15 Positive mention(s) 2 Neutral mention(s) 4 Negative mention(s) 5 Very Negative mention(s) Positive

Does the media favor WM or GFL?

In the previous week, Waste Management had 55 more articles in the media than GFL Environmental. MarketBeat recorded 57 mentions for Waste Management and 2 mentions for GFL Environmental. GFL Environmental's average media sentiment score of 0.90 beat Waste Management's score of 0.71 indicating that GFL Environmental is being referred to more favorably in the news media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment Waste Management 31 Very Positive mention(s) 15 Positive mention(s) 2 Neutral mention(s) 4 Negative mention(s) 5 Very Negative mention(s) Positive GFL Environmental 1 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 1 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive

Waste Management (WM) Competitors

$224.86 -0.22 (-0.10%)

As of 10:10 AM Eastern

Compare

WM vs. CLH, RSG, WCN, ROL, and GFL

Should you buy Waste Management stock or one of its competitors? Waste Management's main competitors and comparable companies include Clean Harbors (CLH), Republic Services (RSG), Waste Connections (WCN), Rollins (ROL), and GFL Environmental (GFL). Companies are selected based on similarities in market, industry, and size. These companies are all part of the "environmental & facilities services" industry.

How does Waste Management compare to Clean Harbors?

Clean Harbors (NYSE:CLH) and Waste Management (NYSE:WM) are both large-cap industrials companies, but which is the better investment? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their dividends, profitability, valuation, risk, institutional ownership, earnings, analyst recommendations and media sentiment.

Waste Management has higher revenue and earnings than Clean Harbors. Waste Management is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Clean Harbors, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Clean Harbors	$6.03B	2.84	$390.97M	$8.24	39.42
Waste Management	$25.20B	3.57	$2.71B	$7.06	31.88

Clean Harbors presently has a consensus price target of $354.57, suggesting a potential upside of 9.15%. Waste Management has a consensus price target of $258.89, suggesting a potential upside of 15.04%. Given Waste Management's higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Waste Management is more favorable than Clean Harbors.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Clean Harbors	0 Sell rating(s)	5 Hold rating(s)	10 Buy rating(s)	2 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.82
Waste Management	0 Sell rating(s)	7 Hold rating(s)	13 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.65

In the previous week, Waste Management had 36 more articles in the media than Clean Harbors. MarketBeat recorded 57 mentions for Waste Management and 21 mentions for Clean Harbors. Clean Harbors' average media sentiment score of 1.28 beat Waste Management's score of 0.71 indicating that Clean Harbors is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Clean Harbors	13 Very Positive mention(s)	1 Positive mention(s)	0 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive
Waste Management	31 Very Positive mention(s)	15 Positive mention(s)	2 Neutral mention(s)	4 Negative mention(s)	5 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive

Clean Harbors has a beta of 0.86, meaning that its share price is 14% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Waste Management has a beta of 0.44, meaning that its share price is 56% less volatile than the broader market.

Waste Management has a net margin of 11.11% compared to Clean Harbors' net margin of 7.03%. Waste Management's return on equity of 31.68% beat Clean Harbors' return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Clean Harbors	7.03%	15.65%	5.75%
Waste Management	11.11%	31.68%	6.81%

90.4% of Clean Harbors shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 80.4% of Waste Management shares are held by institutional investors. 5.0% of Clean Harbors shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 0.2% of Waste Management shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Summary

Waste Management beats Clean Harbors on 9 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Waste Management compare to Republic Services?

Waste Management (NYSE:WM) and Republic Services (NYSE:RSG) are both large-cap industrials companies, but which is the superior business? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their profitability, institutional ownership, earnings, media sentiment, analyst recommendations, risk, dividends and valuation.

Waste Management presently has a consensus target price of $258.89, indicating a potential upside of 15.04%. Republic Services has a consensus target price of $245.26, indicating a potential upside of 11.05%. Given Waste Management's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, research analysts plainly believe Waste Management is more favorable than Republic Services.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Waste Management	0 Sell rating(s)	7 Hold rating(s)	13 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.65
Republic Services	0 Sell rating(s)	11 Hold rating(s)	11 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.50

80.4% of Waste Management shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 57.7% of Republic Services shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.2% of Waste Management shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.1% of Republic Services shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Republic Services has a net margin of 12.94% compared to Waste Management's net margin of 11.11%. Waste Management's return on equity of 31.68% beat Republic Services' return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Waste Management	11.11%	31.68%	6.81%
Republic Services	12.94%	18.69%	6.49%

Waste Management has a beta of 0.44, suggesting that its stock price is 56% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Republic Services has a beta of 0.4, suggesting that its stock price is 60% less volatile than the broader market.

Waste Management pays an annual dividend of $3.78 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.7%. Republic Services pays an annual dividend of $2.50 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.1%. Waste Management pays out 53.5% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Republic Services pays out 35.4% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Waste Management has increased its dividend for 22 consecutive years and Republic Services has increased its dividend for 22 consecutive years.

Waste Management has higher revenue and earnings than Republic Services. Republic Services is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Waste Management, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Waste Management	$25.20B	3.57	$2.71B	$7.06	31.88
Republic Services	$16.59B	4.08	$2.14B	$7.06	31.28

In the previous week, Waste Management had 25 more articles in the media than Republic Services. MarketBeat recorded 57 mentions for Waste Management and 32 mentions for Republic Services. Republic Services' average media sentiment score of 1.56 beat Waste Management's score of 0.71 indicating that Republic Services is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Waste Management	31 Very Positive mention(s)	15 Positive mention(s)	2 Neutral mention(s)	4 Negative mention(s)	5 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive
Republic Services	23 Very Positive mention(s)	3 Positive mention(s)	2 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Very Positive

Summary

Waste Management beats Republic Services on 13 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Waste Management compare to Waste Connections?

Waste Connections (NYSE:WCN) and Waste Management (NYSE:WM) are both large-cap industrials companies, but which is the superior business? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their risk, media sentiment, dividends, profitability, earnings, analyst recommendations, valuation and institutional ownership.

Waste Connections pays an annual dividend of $1.40 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.8%. Waste Management pays an annual dividend of $3.78 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.7%. Waste Connections pays out 33.7% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Waste Management pays out 53.5% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Waste Connections has raised its dividend for 8 consecutive years and Waste Management has raised its dividend for 22 consecutive years. Waste Management is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

86.1% of Waste Connections shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 80.4% of Waste Management shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.3% of Waste Connections shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 0.2% of Waste Management shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Waste Management has a net margin of 11.11% compared to Waste Connections' net margin of 10.86%. Waste Management's return on equity of 31.68% beat Waste Connections' return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Waste Connections	10.86%	17.31%	6.62%
Waste Management	11.11%	31.68%	6.81%

Waste Connections currently has a consensus target price of $200.89, indicating a potential upside of 18.80%. Waste Management has a consensus target price of $258.89, indicating a potential upside of 15.04%. Given Waste Connections' stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, research analysts clearly believe Waste Connections is more favorable than Waste Management.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Waste Connections	0 Sell rating(s)	4 Hold rating(s)	14 Buy rating(s)	2 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.90
Waste Management	0 Sell rating(s)	7 Hold rating(s)	13 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.65

Waste Management has higher revenue and earnings than Waste Connections. Waste Management is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Waste Connections, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Waste Connections	$9.47B	4.49	$1.08B	$4.15	40.75
Waste Management	$25.20B	3.57	$2.71B	$7.06	31.88

Waste Connections has a beta of 0.48, indicating that its share price is 52% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Waste Management has a beta of 0.44, indicating that its share price is 56% less volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, Waste Management had 41 more articles in the media than Waste Connections. MarketBeat recorded 57 mentions for Waste Management and 16 mentions for Waste Connections. Waste Connections' average media sentiment score of 1.19 beat Waste Management's score of 0.71 indicating that Waste Connections is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Waste Connections	15 Very Positive mention(s)	1 Positive mention(s)	0 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive
Waste Management	31 Very Positive mention(s)	15 Positive mention(s)	2 Neutral mention(s)	4 Negative mention(s)	5 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive

Summary

Waste Connections beats Waste Management on 11 of the 20 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Waste Management compare to Rollins?

Rollins (NYSE:ROL) and Waste Management (NYSE:WM) are both large-cap industrials companies, but which is the superior business? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their earnings, valuation, dividends, profitability, institutional ownership, risk, analyst recommendations and media sentiment.

Waste Management has higher revenue and earnings than Rollins. Waste Management is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Rollins, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Rollins	$3.76B	4.64	$526.71M	$1.10	32.97
Waste Management	$25.20B	3.57	$2.71B	$7.06	31.88

In the previous week, Waste Management had 39 more articles in the media than Rollins. MarketBeat recorded 57 mentions for Waste Management and 18 mentions for Rollins. Rollins' average media sentiment score of 0.75 beat Waste Management's score of 0.71 indicating that Rollins is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Rollins	10 Very Positive mention(s)	2 Positive mention(s)	5 Neutral mention(s)	1 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive
Waste Management	31 Very Positive mention(s)	15 Positive mention(s)	2 Neutral mention(s)	4 Negative mention(s)	5 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive

51.8% of Rollins shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 80.4% of Waste Management shares are owned by institutional investors. 5.8% of Rollins shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.2% of Waste Management shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Rollins pays an annual dividend of $0.73 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.0%. Waste Management pays an annual dividend of $3.78 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.7%. Rollins pays out 66.4% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Waste Management pays out 53.5% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Rollins has raised its dividend for 4 consecutive years and Waste Management has raised its dividend for 22 consecutive years.

Rollins currently has a consensus price target of $48.71, suggesting a potential upside of 34.31%. Waste Management has a consensus price target of $258.89, suggesting a potential upside of 15.04%. Given Rollins' higher possible upside, research analysts plainly believe Rollins is more favorable than Waste Management.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Rollins	3 Sell rating(s)	10 Hold rating(s)	5 Buy rating(s)	1 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.21
Waste Management	0 Sell rating(s)	7 Hold rating(s)	13 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.65

Rollins has a beta of 0.75, meaning that its stock price is 25% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Waste Management has a beta of 0.44, meaning that its stock price is 56% less volatile than the broader market.

Rollins has a net margin of 13.55% compared to Waste Management's net margin of 11.11%. Rollins' return on equity of 38.81% beat Waste Management's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Rollins	13.55%	38.81%	17.24%
Waste Management	11.11%	31.68%	6.81%

Summary

Rollins beats Waste Management on 11 of the 20 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Waste Management compare to GFL Environmental?

Waste Management (NYSE:WM) and GFL Environmental (NYSE:GFL) are both large-cap industrials companies, but which is the superior business? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their earnings, profitability, media sentiment, valuation, institutional ownership, analyst recommendations, risk and dividends.

Waste Management pays an annual dividend of $3.78 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.7%. GFL Environmental pays an annual dividend of $0.07 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.2%. Waste Management pays out 53.5% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. GFL Environmental pays out -13.2% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Waste Management has raised its dividend for 22 consecutive years and GFL Environmental has raised its dividend for 5 consecutive years. Waste Management is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

Waste Management has a net margin of 11.11% compared to GFL Environmental's net margin of -3.28%. Waste Management's return on equity of 31.68% beat GFL Environmental's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Waste Management	11.11%	31.68%	6.81%
GFL Environmental	-3.28%	4.14%	1.55%

In the previous week, Waste Management had 55 more articles in the media than GFL Environmental. MarketBeat recorded 57 mentions for Waste Management and 2 mentions for GFL Environmental. GFL Environmental's average media sentiment score of 0.90 beat Waste Management's score of 0.71 indicating that GFL Environmental is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Waste Management	31 Very Positive mention(s)	15 Positive mention(s)	2 Neutral mention(s)	4 Negative mention(s)	5 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive
GFL Environmental	1 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	1 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive

Waste Management has a beta of 0.44, suggesting that its share price is 56% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, GFL Environmental has a beta of 0.68, suggesting that its share price is 32% less volatile than the broader market.

80.4% of Waste Management shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 64.7% of GFL Environmental shares are held by institutional investors. 0.2% of Waste Management shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 8.7% of GFL Environmental shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

GFL Environmental has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Waste Management. GFL Environmental is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Waste Management, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Waste Management	$25.20B	3.57	$2.71B	$7.06	31.88
GFL Environmental	$4.73B	3.16	$2.74B	-$0.53	N/A

Waste Management currently has a consensus price target of $258.89, suggesting a potential upside of 15.04%. GFL Environmental has a consensus price target of $54.75, suggesting a potential upside of 31.94%. Given GFL Environmental's higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe GFL Environmental is more favorable than Waste Management.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Waste Management	0 Sell rating(s)	7 Hold rating(s)	13 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.65
GFL Environmental	2 Sell rating(s)	2 Hold rating(s)	11 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.60

Summary

Waste Management beats GFL Environmental on 13 of the 19 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Waste Management News Delivered to You Automatically

Subscribe Now

SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding WM and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of NYSE and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.

WM vs. The Competition

Export

Metric	Waste Management	Commercial Services & Supplies Industry	Industrials Sector	NYSE Exchange
Market Cap	$89.37B	$4.21B	$10.72B	$24.19B
Dividend Yield	1.69%	5.09%	97.12%	3.73%
P/E Ratio	31.88	29.14	26.77	30.14
Price / Sales	3.57	1,182.01	346.82	19.90
Price / Cash	14.92	22.53	24.59	31.97
Price / Book	9.06	4.19	4.53	6.84
Net Income	$2.71B	$146.38M	$610.97M	$1.07B
7 Day Performance	0.27%	-0.06%	-0.97%	-0.57%
1 Month Performance	-5.88%	2.04%	3.20%	2.97%
1 Year Performance	-2.15%	15.89%	15.27%	18.26%

Waste Management Competitors List

Export

Company	MarketRank	Share Price	Analysts' Price Target	1Y Price Performance	Market Cap	Revenue	P/E Ratio	Employee Count	Indicator(s)
WM Waste Management	4.6555 of 5 stars	$224.89 -0.1%	$258.89 +15.1%	-1.5%	$89.88B	$25.20B	31.85	60,500
CLH Clean Harbors	3.1317 of 5 stars	$310.12 +0.6%	$354.57 +14.3%	+32.7%	$16.37B	$6.03B	37.64	22,155	Positive News Insider Trade Analyst Revision
RSG Republic Services	4.7221 of 5 stars	$214.82 +0.1%	$244.63 +13.9%	-5.9%	$66.09B	$16.59B	30.43	42,000	Positive News Insider Trade
WCN Waste Connections	4.4922 of 5 stars	$166.24 -0.3%	$200.89 +20.8%	-9.2%	$41.82B	$9.47B	40.06	24,214	Positive News
ROL Rollins	4.5335 of 5 stars	$37.24 -1.3%	$48.71 +30.8%	-37.4%	$17.92B	$3.92B	33.85	21,946

Related Companies and Tools

Related Companies

Top 10 Stock Comparisons

This page (NYSE:WM) was last updated on 8/20/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.

From Our Partners

Unlock superior investment research and tools.

Get MarketBeat All Access

In-depth profiles and analysis for 20,000 public companies.
Real-time analyst ratings, insider transactions, earnings data, and more.
Our daily ratings and market update email newsletter.

Sign In
Create Account

Your Email Address:

Your Password:

Forgot your password?

Your Email Address:

Choose a Password:

By creating a free account, you agree to our terms of service. This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

Waste Management (WM) Competitors

WM vs. CLH, RSG, WCN, ROL, and GFL

How does Waste Management compare to Clean Harbors?

Summary

How does Waste Management compare to Republic Services?

Summary

How does Waste Management compare to Waste Connections?

Summary

How does Waste Management compare to Rollins?

Summary

How does Waste Management compare to GFL Environmental?

Summary

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

Media Sentiment Over Time

WM vs. The Competition

Waste Management Competitors List

Related Companies and Tools

Best-in-Class Portfolio Monitoring

Stock Ideas and Recommendations

Advanced Stock Screeners and Research Tools

About MarketBeat

MarketBeat Products

Popular Tools

Financial Calendars

Terms & Info

Waste Management (WM) Competitors

WM vs. CLH, RSG, WCN, ROL, and GFL

How does Waste Management compare to Clean Harbors?

Which has higher valuation and earnings, CLH or WM?

Do analysts rate CLH or WM?

Does the media prefer CLH or WM?

Which has more risk and volatility, CLH or WM?

Is CLH or WM more profitable?

Do institutionals & insiders have more ownership in CLH or WM?

Summary

How does Waste Management compare to Republic Services?

Do analysts prefer WM or RSG?

Do institutionals & insiders believe in WM or RSG?

Is WM or RSG more profitable?

Which has more volatility and risk, WM or RSG?

Is WM or RSG a better dividend stock?

Which has stronger valuation and earnings, WM or RSG?

Does the media refer more to WM or RSG?

Summary

How does Waste Management compare to Waste Connections?

Is WCN or WM a better dividend stock?

Do insiders & institutionals believe in WCN or WM?

Is WCN or WM more profitable?

Do analysts prefer WCN or WM?

Which has higher valuation and earnings, WCN or WM?

Which has more volatility and risk, WCN or WM?

Does the media prefer WCN or WM?

Summary

How does Waste Management compare to Rollins?

Which has preferable valuation & earnings, ROL or WM?

Does the media favor ROL or WM?

Do institutionals and insiders hold more shares of ROL or WM?

Is ROL or WM a better dividend stock?

Do analysts recommend ROL or WM?

Which has more risk & volatility, ROL or WM?

Is ROL or WM more profitable?

Summary

How does Waste Management compare to GFL Environmental?

Is WM or GFL a better dividend stock?

Is WM or GFL more profitable?

Does the media favor WM or GFL?

Which has more risk & volatility, WM or GFL?

Do insiders and institutionals have more ownership in WM or GFL?

Which has higher earnings and valuation, WM or GFL?

Do analysts rate WM or GFL?

Summary

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

Media Sentiment Over Time

WM vs. The Competition

Waste Management Competitors List

Related Companies and Tools

MarketBeat All Access Features

Best-in-Class Portfolio Monitoring

Stock Ideas and Recommendations

Advanced Stock Screeners and Research Tools