Veralto (VLTO) Competitors

Veralto has higher revenue and earnings than Teradyne. Veralto is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Teradyne, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Teradyne has a net margin of 22.55% compared to Veralto's net margin of 17.33%. Veralto's return on equity of 34.63% beat Teradyne's return on equity.

Teradyne pays an annual dividend of $0.52 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.1%. Veralto pays an annual dividend of $0.52 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.6%. Teradyne pays out 9.6% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Veralto pays out 13.4% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Teradyne has increased its dividend for 1 consecutive years and Veralto has increased its dividend for 1 consecutive years.

99.8% of Teradyne shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 91.3% of Veralto shares are held by institutional investors. 0.2% of Teradyne shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 0.4% of Veralto shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

In the previous week, Teradyne had 34 more articles in the media than Veralto. MarketBeat recorded 39 mentions for Teradyne and 5 mentions for Veralto. Teradyne's average media sentiment score of 1.09 beat Veralto's score of 0.13 indicating that Teradyne is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Teradyne has a beta of 1.79, meaning that its share price is 79% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Veralto has a beta of 0.77, meaning that its share price is 23% less volatile than the broader market.

Teradyne currently has a consensus price target of $339.80, indicating a potential downside of 9.59%. Veralto has a consensus price target of $105.88, indicating a potential upside of 25.32%. Given Veralto's higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Veralto is more favorable than Teradyne.

Veralto has a net margin of 17.33% compared to Fortive's net margin of 12.84%. Veralto's return on equity of 34.63% beat Fortive's return on equity.

Veralto currently has a consensus price target of $105.88, suggesting a potential upside of 25.32%. Fortive has a consensus price target of $61.54, suggesting a potential upside of 2.64%. Given Veralto's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, equities analysts clearly believe Veralto is more favorable than Fortive.

In the previous week, Veralto had 1 more articles in the media than Fortive. MarketBeat recorded 5 mentions for Veralto and 4 mentions for Fortive. Fortive's average media sentiment score of 1.54 beat Veralto's score of 0.13 indicating that Fortive is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Veralto has higher revenue and earnings than Fortive. Veralto is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Fortive, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Veralto pays an annual dividend of $0.52 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.6%. Fortive pays an annual dividend of $0.24 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.4%. Veralto pays out 13.4% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Fortive pays out 14.4% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Veralto has raised its dividend for 1 consecutive years and Fortive has raised its dividend for 2 consecutive years. Veralto is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

Veralto has a beta of 0.77, indicating that its stock price is 23% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Fortive has a beta of 1.09, indicating that its stock price is 9% more volatile than the broader market.

91.3% of Veralto shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 94.9% of Fortive shares are held by institutional investors. 0.4% of Veralto shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.7% of Fortive shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Veralto currently has a consensus target price of $105.88, suggesting a potential upside of 25.32%. Nova has a consensus target price of $518.22, suggesting a potential upside of 1.19%. Given Veralto's higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Veralto is more favorable than Nova.

Veralto has a beta of 0.77, meaning that its stock price is 23% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Nova has a beta of 1.78, meaning that its stock price is 78% more volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, Nova had 4 more articles in the media than Veralto. MarketBeat recorded 9 mentions for Nova and 5 mentions for Veralto. Veralto's average media sentiment score of 0.13 beat Nova's score of 0.00 indicating that Veralto is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Veralto has higher revenue and earnings than Nova. Veralto is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Nova, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

91.3% of Veralto shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 83.0% of Nova shares are held by institutional investors. 0.4% of Veralto shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 1.0% of Nova shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Nova has a net margin of 29.21% compared to Veralto's net margin of 17.33%. Veralto's return on equity of 34.63% beat Nova's return on equity.

Veralto has higher revenue and earnings than Revvity. Veralto is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Revvity, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Veralto has a net margin of 17.33% compared to Revvity's net margin of 8.26%. Veralto's return on equity of 34.63% beat Revvity's return on equity.

Veralto presently has a consensus price target of $105.88, suggesting a potential upside of 25.32%. Revvity has a consensus price target of $107.73, suggesting a potential upside of 11.19%. Given Veralto's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, equities research analysts clearly believe Veralto is more favorable than Revvity.

91.3% of Veralto shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 86.7% of Revvity shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.4% of Veralto shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.9% of Revvity shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Veralto has a beta of 0.77, indicating that its share price is 23% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Revvity has a beta of 1.05, indicating that its share price is 5% more volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, Revvity had 7 more articles in the media than Veralto. MarketBeat recorded 12 mentions for Revvity and 5 mentions for Veralto. Revvity's average media sentiment score of 0.29 beat Veralto's score of 0.13 indicating that Revvity is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Veralto pays an annual dividend of $0.52 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.6%. Revvity pays an annual dividend of $0.28 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.3%. Veralto pays out 13.4% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Revvity pays out 13.4% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Veralto has increased its dividend for 1 consecutive years. Veralto is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.